WEATHER MODIFICATION. - When most people look up they see clouds. WE SEE POTENTIAL-VEÐURFARSSTJÓRNUN.. Sagt frá hvernig og með hverju.Photos!

 

 

 

 

When most people look up they see clouds.

WE SEE POTENTIAL

AL.

THE SKY´S THE LIMIT.

http://www.weathermodification.com/index.php 

http://www.weathermodification.com/atmospheric-evaluation.php 

CLOUD SEEDING (Skýja sæðing) (CHEMTRAILS?) 

Weather Modification, Inc., has a wide range of services to provide knowledge, data, equipment and capability at any phase in your project. We can also tailor a program to meet your specific objectives and manage it from beginning to end.

Our talented scientists, researchers, project managers, technicians, and pilots have the expertise you need to carry out an efficient, effective weather program.

Feasibility Studies

Weather Modification, Inc., has been involved in multiple programs with the goal of identifying the potential benefits derived from the application of cloud seeding techniques. Our feasibility studies focus on the cloud structures and patterns in the project area. Gathered information assists in identifying the cloud seeding technology that's best suited for the project.

Systems Integration

Critical to the success of any major project is the integration of numerous, sometimes disparate, subsystems into a single, highly functional system. Weather Modification, Inc., excels at bringing these elements - radar, aircraft, scientific instrumentation, personnel and more - into a cohesive service offering.

Program Design

Based on a project assessment and/or previous work experiences, Weather Modification, Inc., can design a service offering that meets your objectives.

Program Management

Weather Modification, Inc., offers both on-site and remote program management for part or all of the services we provide. Examples range from overall program supervision to provision of radar systems, data observers, aircraft, pilots, mechanics and scientific analysis.

Technology Transfer

The technology transfer training program offered by Weather Modification, Inc., is helpful when starting a new program - or when upgrading an existing program. We are flexible, tailoring the training to fit the specific objectives of your program. Lectures are complemented with numerous hands-on examples to ensure maximum familiarity with equipment and procedures.

Our qualified, expert instructors usually conduct technology transfer training at the Weather Modification, Inc., corporate facilities. This allows optimum use of our facilities, aircraft, equipment and personnel, and provides a more cost-effective solution. We can also make accommodations to conduct training in remote locations

We work with many clients whether it is on a long-term basis or a short-term contract. Client requests are almost never the same - and we take pride in customizing our services to meet your specific needs.

 

Capturing the Skys Knowledge

Our atmosphere supports virtually all life on the planet. Its gases allow respiration; its precipitation provides fresh water. Weather Modification, Inc., provides the tools to accurately and efficiently observe, measure, and monitor the atmospheric properties that govern how safely and efficiently these life-sustaining functions occur - we can apply these tools throughout the troposphere.

Our atmospheric assessment services provide a more complete understanding of local and regional atmospheric processes, a solid scientific basis, and a higher probability of success, for any cloud modification projects designed to increase precipitation, reduce hail or disperse fog.

Atmospheric Assessment & Evaluation Services:

• Precipitation Development and Measurement
• Cloud Formation and Character
• Weather Monitoring and Remote Sensing

 

 

 

 

WORKING WITH THE SKY. 

We've developed an array of effective meteorological support services and a powerful selection of supplementary instrumentation. Our services are essential to climatology studies, precipitation enhancement and storm damage mitigation, fog dissipation, weather forecasting, and many other meteorological projects. 

 

Weather Forecasting

Our meteorologists regularly prepare project-specific weather forecasts for clients around the world. We structure our forecasts to your needs, which can be ready for your review at the same time each day, week, month or year. We specialize in forecasting for water resource management goals, but also support construction projects, industry, agriculture, environmental quality, and any specialized needs you may have.

 Climate Study and Data Analysis

We can analyze your existing meteorological data set - no matter what your requirements. Our team is experienced with all data from first-order weather stations: temperature, pressure, humidity, winds and precipitation. We can even take raw, third-party data and create a final report with valuable insight from our team of experts. 

 

Numerical Modeling

We can simulate atmospheric processes for a variety of purposes: to predict an occurrence beforehand or to replicate a past storm. Both can be very useful, and contribute to a more complete understanding of an atmospheric event.

More about Numerical Weather Modeling

Special Purpose Data Collection

Our weather stations and instrumentation can observe and record whatever data you need at your construction, industrial and agricultural sites. Our precipitation measurement instrumentation includes simple, accurate, manually read gauges to sophisticated, automated recording sensors.

More about instrumentation for special purpose weather data collection

 

WATCHING IT HAPPEN. 

 

Fresh water from rain or snow provides almost all water for human and animal consumption, including irrigation. While the formation of precipitation is reasonably well understood, the variations in the processes from cloud-to-cloud and locale-to-locale can be very significant. 

The specialized airborne instrumentation for in situ cloud measurement makes it possible to directly observe precipitation development:

 

For general atmospheric measurement and characterization:

• Total temperature
• Dew point
• Pressure / pressure altitude
• 3D winds
• GPS position
• Vertical acceleration

For the measurement of cloud hydrometeors:

• Cloud liquid water content
• Cloud droplets (sizes and numbers)
• Cloud images (sizes, shapes, and numbers; 
  small particles)
• Precipitation images (sizes, shapes, and 
  numbers, precipitation-sized particles)
• 
  

  In the Clouds

  The transformation of invisible atmospheric water vapor to visible water droplets and ice crystals is ,
   CCN) or the development of ice within a water cloud by ice-forming nuclei, IN)
   
   
  The most common forms of nuclei:
  Soils
  (agriculture)

  Deserts
  (wind-borne dust)

  Oceans
  (sea spray)

  Volcanism
  (ash, dust)

  Transportation
  (combustion of fossil fuels, dust)

  Wildfires
  (smoke and ash)

  General pollution
  (from industry)

  These aerosols provide the various nuclei that govern cloud and precipitation development.

  The effects of human-made aerosols on natural precipitation and the potential for certain other human-made aerosols (cloud seeding) to favorably influence cloud processes. 
  Aerosol measurements reveals information critical to cloud and precipitation processes, including the quantification of cloud condensation nuclei, and ice nuclei. 
  For the measurement of aerosols that function specifically as nuclei that affect cloud and precipitation processes, Weather Modification, Inc., recommends:

Cloud Condensation Nuclei Counter

 Acoustic Ice Nucleus Counter (AINC)

 

 DATA FROM AFAR. 

Weather Modification, Inc., offers a variety of remote sensing solutions to measure  various atmospheric parameters from afar. 

 We offer C-band Doppler and polarimetric Doppler weather radar systems. View the specifications and capabilities of our state-of-the-scienceWeather Radar Systems for more information.

Atmospheric water, in vapor and liquid forms, can be readily measured by dual-channel microwave radiometers. Atmospheric sounding systems for the measurement of upper atmosphere temperature, humidity, and winds are also available. Learn more about either of these monitoring and sensing technologies in ourMeteorological Services section. 

 

TO  THE  CLOUDS. 

http://www.weathermodification.com/cloud-seeding-aerial.php 

 

Aerial cloud seeding is the process of delivering a seeding agent by aircraft - either at the cloud base or cloud top. Top seeding allows for direct injection of the seeding agent into the supercooled cloud top. Base seeding is the release of the seeding agent in the updraft of a cloud base.

Typically, aerial cloud seeding is the most effective way to accurately target a particular cloud because it  allows for close proximity to the potential cloud candidates.

Available Cloud Seeding Equipment 

Weather Modification, Inc. manufactures a variety of cloud seeding equipment. We complete FAA-approved installations of seeding equipment, emphasizing functionality, safety, reliability, and ease of use. Aerial cloud seeding equipment includes:

Selecting Aircraft for Aerial Cloud Seeding

The type of seeding method, whether it's cloud top seeding or cloud base seeding, and the type of measurements required often determine the model of aircraft used for the mission. Weather Modification, Inc. has several types of aircraft available with a wide range of capabilities and cabin capacities. We can also provide operation and maintenance expertise. 

Introduction of Seeding Agents

 http://www.weathermodification.com/cloud-seeding.php

Water resources are increasingly taxed by exploding demand and continued population growth. The world's population is projected to grow over 40% in the next 45 years.

Weather modification, commonly known as cloud seeding, is the application of scientific technology that can enhance a cloud's ability to produce precipitation. Weather Modification, Inc., is on the forefront of scientific technology to maximize water availability worldwide. Application of scientific concepts and extensive scientific experimentation has proven that cloud seeding increases the amount of precipitation.

Cloud seeding useful in the following applications:

     Increasing Precipitation 

The most common application of cloud seeding is to increase precipitation, possible with both warm andcold clouds.   There are two primary methods employed to stimulate precipitation. One, hygroscopic seeding, affects warm cloud processes. The other,glaciogenic seeding, initiates cold cloud processes.

Though occasionally both techniques may be helpful, in most cases one can be utilized more effectively than the other. In addition, either technology can be applied from the surface (ground-based) or from an aircraft. Weather Modification, Inc. can help you decide which method will be most effective.  

Augmenting Snowfall

Glaciogenic seeding can also be used to increase precipitation from stratiform and orographic clouds. In such cases, seeding may be accomplished through either ground-based or airborne modes. By increasing snowpack and resultant spring runoff, subsequent water supplies for hydropower are increased. In addition to alleviating the need for alternative costly power supplies, cloud seeding increases the water availability for municipal, recreational, and environmental interests.

Enhancing Rainfall

Efforts to increase rainfall during the warm seasons are typically aimed at convective clouds. While it is theoretically possible to seed such clouds using ground-based equipment, targeting from aircraft is much more efficient and accurate. It is usually possible to affect the cloud through releases of a seeding agent in sub-cloud updrafts, or by dropping the seeding agents directly into the upper regions of the clouds.

Warm season glaciogenic seeding is typically applied to treat supercooled cumulus congestus clouds, either by releasing the ice-forming (nucleating) seeding agent in the updraft beneath the actively-growing cumulus, or by dropping the nucleating agent directly into the supercooled cloud top. The seeding agents can produce ice at significantly warmer temperatures than the natural process. This is how glaciogenic seeding gives the treated cloud a head start in producing precipitation.

When clouds do not grow tall and cold enough to produce precipitation through the Bergeron process, it may be possible to stimulate precipitation growth by seeding these warm clouds withhygroscopic seeding agents. This approach can be quite successful through stimulation of the warm cloud precipitation processes. Hygroscopic seeding is normally done from aircraft flying in the sub-cloud updrafts, in order to affect the initial cloud droplet development which occurs in this zone.

 

     Mitigating Hail Damage

Cloud seeding can be used as a tool to help mitigate hail damage and protect crop yields, homes and other property, thus reducing the economic harm from disastrous storm damage. Since hail is itself ice that is produced only by vigorous convective clouds, it is certain that such clouds are cold enough to be amenable to glaciogenic seeding techniques. Hail develops when excess supercooled liquid water develops within strong updrafts. However, if the excess might be induced to freeze into large numbers of small particles rather than much smaller numbers of large particles, the ice that does precipitate may melt during its transit through the warm sub-cloud layer, or if it doesn't it will reach the surface as much smaller, less-damaging, ice.

 

     Dispersing Fog   

Another useful application for cloud seeding is the treatment of ground-based clouds, also known as fog. Supercooled fogs, comprised of water droplets at temperatures cold enough to permit ice development, can easily be cleared by glaciogenic seeding. This can be done either from the ground or from airborne application. Your choice between the two will depend on characteristics such as local infrastructure, topography, and wind.

 

 

Enlist our team of cloud seeding experts.

Whether you are looking for a small operation or a full program, Weather Modification, Inc. can ensure your cloud seeding project runs smoothly. From Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) approved aircraft installations, configured for aerial cloud seeding and cloud physics, to ground-based seeding equipment and training, Weather Modification, Inc., has the equipment, experience and knowledge you need.

Types of Cloud Seeding:

• Aerial Cloud Seeding
• Ground-Based Cloud Seeding

 

 

 

 A FLEET BUILT FOR SUCCESS..

Weather Modification, Inc., has been modifying and operating aircraft for cloud seeding and atmospheric research operations since 1961. We maintain and operate a fleet of more than 35 twin-engine aircraft in various configurations that meet the needs of every client.

Weather Modification, Inc., uses several models of aircraft in our own operations, although we can adapt our equipment to virtually any type of aircraft for specific custome

 Beechcraft King Air

Hawker

Bombardier

Piper

 

Aircraft Modification

If you operate your own aviation fleet, we can provide custom-modified aircraft to match your specific mission requirements - or we can modify your existing aircraft to perform the operations required.

Our talented team of experienced technicians facilitates the entire process - from design to modification to US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) standards certification. Weather Modification, Inc., can also perform any necessary maintenance required or upgrades requested by the client during the modification process.

Some of the modifications that we currently perform are:

• VIP Transport
• Photographic Equipment
• Remote Sensing
• Environmental Monitoring
• Telemetry
• Atmospheric Chemistry
• Cloud Physics Measurements
• Air Ambulance
• Cloud Seeding

Weather Modification, Inc. has acquired US FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for select seeding equipment on the following aircraft:

• Hawker 400
• King Air 350, 200, and C90

The STC ensures that equipment is built and installed to the highest aviation standard for safety and performance.

Aircraft Sales and Leasing.

We can provide air and ground staff for a turnkey program

Unparalleled support from our maintenance and flight department assures smooth operation for your project

Support is available 24-hours a day, 7-days a week, around the globe

Let us locate, evaluate, and facilitate the purchase of a suitable aircraft for your needs. 

 

Solutions for the Ground

There are times when it's beneficial to seed from the ground. For example, ground seeding is an excellent option for the treatment of low-level clouds over complex terrain.

In some cases, seeding from fixed locations is acceptable; in others, mobility is needed.

Exclusive Ground Seeding Solutions from Weather Modification, Inc.

Weather Modification, Inc., offers specially designed and manufactured solutions to meet the specific challenges of ground-based cloud seeding. Both incorporate the latest in ground-based pyrotechnic applications, and are self-contained. When controlled via satellite, they can be sited virtually anywhere. When weather at the seeding location is critical, complete meteorological stations can be co-located with both fixed and mobile ground-based units:

Ground-Based Seeding Generator

There are two types of ground-based generators:

Remote Controlled Ground-Based Generators and Manual Ground-Based Generators. These solution-burning ice nuclei generators are most often used to seed orographic clouds in areas of rugged topography.

Remote Controlled Ground-Based Seeding GeneratorsThe remote system utilizes a communication link, such as Iridium. The method of communication is determined by the location, and the data link is integrated with the microprocessor for complete remote control.

A centrally located computer provides real-time control of the system, including access to system status and weather station data. This rugged system is designed to withstand the extremes of any storm system that may pass over the site. They are constructed to function even in extreme rime icing and operate under the most demanding of weather conditions.

Manual Ground-Based Seeding GeneratorsThe manual system is similar to the remote system, except there is no need for communication link, microprocessor or weather data collection equipment. The relatively simple task of operating the valves and switches is performed onsite

Ground-Based Flare Tree

Cost-effective, simple to maintain and easy to install, the ground-based flare tree, or GBFT, comes in two versions to accommodate different flare types: glaciogenic (108 flares) and hygroscopic (60 flares). All designs offer remote, real-time control of the system, utilizing cellular/satellite technology in conjunction with microprocessor technology.

A single, user-friendly graphical user interface enables communication with all of your GBFTs � and provides additional useful features:

• Locally save detailed logs
• Receive and monitor real-time status
• Gain fully automated system control of the system
• On the Radar
• 

  Weather Modification, Inc. not only sells and services C-band,X-band, and S-band weather radar systems to clients around the world; we incorporate them into our own cloud seeding projects. Ranging from smaller mobile radar systems, to polarimetric Doppler research quality systems, we can meet radar needs for a wide range of customers.

  Weather Radar Systems are a versatile tool for atmospheric assessment, with uses that include:

  • Rainfall estimates
  • Real-time cloud detection
  • Speed and direction of cell motion
  • Identifying precipitation location and intensity

  New Single and Dual Polarized Radar Systems

  Weather Modification, Inc., owns, operates, and sells new single pol and dual pol radar systems that utilize a solid state transmitters, digital receivers and antenna control systems. Configurable display software allows a wide variety of user-defined product display and analysis features.

  Available antenna diameters include 3.5 meters, 4.2 meters, and 4.5 meters. Also available are new fiberglass radomes.

  Dual-Polarization Specifications

  Single-Polarization Specifications

  Refurbished Radar Systems

  C-band weather radar systems with state of the art transmitter and receiver upgrades. TITAN display and analysis software are available for sale or lease. These systems come with an 8-foot antenna dish and a 12-foot fiberglass radome, and can be installed with a tower, or as a mobile unit.

  System Specifications

  Upgrade Services

  We provide transmitter, receiver and antenna upgrades to nearly any type of C-band weather radar. After an assessment of your existing radar, we can recommend upgrades that allow the most modern equipment for reliability and superior data quality.

  More about Weather Radar System Upgrades.

 

Unmatched Expertise, Exceptional Equipment

Whether you need to document the character of clouds or variations in visibility, we have the knowledge you require, the instrumentation you need and the means to deploy it.

Weather Modification, Inc., conducts atmospheric environmental monitoring programs of any scale. We are well-known for airborne measurements but we offer ground-based systems as well.

Measuring aerosols, visibility and

cloud formation

For the measurement of aerosols, visibility and cloud formation, we have:

• Passive Cavity Aerosol Spectrometer Probes
• Condensation and Cloud Condensation Nuclei Counters
• Ice Nucleus Counters

 

 

Trace gas detection

We also provide sensors to detect a variety of atmospheric trace gases important to environmental quality, including ozone (O3), carbon dioxide CO2, carbon monoxide (CO), and sulfurous and nitrous oxides (SOx, NOx).

 

Transportation and dispersion of 

aerosols

To document the movement and dispersion of aerosols in the atmosphere, we offer tracer technologies that enable you to release and track a variety of materials to considerable distances downwind. If the terrain is complex, we can provide numerical models to gain understanding of locally specific transport and dispersion.

 

Worldwide Success

The proven success of Weather Modification, Inc., in atmospheric and weather operations is evident by our lengthy and impressive client listing speaks for itself. Our reputation for successful cloud seeding and meteorological services leads our veteran pilots, experienced meteorologists and radar engineers around the world. Our valued clients include private and public insurance companies, water resource management organizations, as well as federal and state government research organizations.

Explore the map below to view projects

Clients & Projects

Antigua	Antigua Cloud Seeding Project
Argentina	Province of Mendoza Ministry of Economy
Australia	Queensland Environmental Protection Agency
Burkina Faso	Program SAAGA
Canada	Alberta Hail Suppression Project
	British Colombia Ministry of Forest
	British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority
	Saskatchewan National Hydrology Research Agency
Greece	Greek National Hail Suppression Program (ELGA)
	Hellenic Navy Supply Center
India	Andhra Pradesh Rainfall Enhancement Project
	Prakalpa Varsha - Maharashtra Rainfall Enhancement Project
	Project Varuna - Karnataka Rainfall Enhancement Project
Indonesia	BPPT Weather Modification Program
Jordan	Arab Automated Systems
	Heshamite Kingdom of Jordan
Mali	Programme Sanji - Mali
Mexico	Precipitation for Augmentation of Rain in Coahuila (PARC)
Morocco	Programme Al-Ghait
Saudi Arabia	Program for Cloud Physics Research and Rain Enhancement in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
	World Meteorological Organization in cooperation with SAU/WMO/FIT Rain Enhancement Project
Spain	Canary Islands - AIRAO Incorporated
Thailand	Bureau of Royal Rainmaking and Agricultural Aviation (BRRAA)
Turkey	ISKI Rain Enhancement Program
	Petkim Petrokimya Holding, A.S. Rain Enhancement Program
United Arab Emirates	U.A.E. Rain Enhancement Program
	U.A.E. Rainfall Enhancement and Air Chemistry Studies - DWRS
United States	Aeromet, Inc. (L-3 Communications) - U.S Department of Defense
	BAMEX - Bow Echo and Mesoscale Convective Vortex Experiment
	CALIPSO - CloudSat Validation Experiment
	Delaware Department of Agriculture Cloud Seeding Program
	Edwards Aquifer Authority
	Federal Aviation Administration - Great Lakes Division
	Gratiot Weather Modification Project
	Illinois Weather Modification Projects
	National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
	National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - National Hurricane Center
	Naval Surface Warfare Center
	Nevada State Cloud Seeding Program
	New Mexico BLAST (Burst Light and Stratus Transmission) Project
	North Dakota Cloud Modification Project (NDCMP)
	North Dakota Thunderstorm Project - North Dakota Atmospheric Resource Board
	North Dakota Tracer Experiment - North Dakota Atmospheric Resource Board
	Northeast Sampling Program - Sonoma Technology, Inc.
	NSF/NCAR ICE-L Field Campaign
	Oklahoma Weather Modification Project (OWMP)
	Panhandle Groundwater Conservation District Rainfall Enhancement Program
	Santa Barbara County Water Agency
	Sonoma Technology, Inc.
	Stanislaus Weather Modification Program
	State of South Dakota - Department of Natural Resources Division of Weather Modification
	Texas Central High Plains Rainfall Enhancement Program
	Texas Experiment in Augmenting Rainfall through Cloud Seeding (TEXARC)
	Texas Weather Modification Program
	The University of North Dakota - US Environmental Protection Agency
	University of Arizona - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
	Upper American River Cloud Seeding Project
	Upper Payette River Basin Cloud Seeding Program
	Upper Tuolumne River Weather Modification Program
	Utah Division of Water Resources
	Utah Division of Water Resources
	West Central Texas Council of Governments Rainfall Enhancement Program
	Western Dakota Water Development District - Black Hills Council of Local Government
	Wyoming Weather Modification Pilot Program

 

Learn More

http://www.weathermodification.com/resources-links.php 

Learn more about new developments, the science behind weather modification, and related issues.

Other Meteorological Organizations

• American Meteorological Society
• Weather Modification Association
• North American Weather Modification Council

• • General Weather Links

  • NCAR Real-Time Weather
  • NOAA Storm Prediction Center
  • NOAA National Hurricane Center
  • University of Wyoming Weather Web
  • College of DuPage Weather Lab
  • NRCS SNOTEL Data
  • MesoWest Weather Network
  • NOAA Aviation Weather Center
  • NOAA Climate Prediction Center
  • http://www.weathermodification.com/uploads/Changnon%20Lambright%201990.pdf
  • 
    

    • •  

        Who We Are

        Weather Modification, Inc., is a global atmospheric sciences company committed to continued advances in the field of weather modification. Whether it’s identifying the potential benefits of cloud seeding or monitoring air quality, we are dedicated to providing sound, scientific atmospheric solutions.

        Nearly 50 Years of Expertise in Atmospheric Sciences

        Weather Modification Inc., was founded in 1961, in the small town of Bowman, ND. Bowman is located in an area of the state where the average rainfall is near desert amounts and hail is common. In order to preserve the livelihood of the agricultural community, two pilots/farmers decided to enter the forefront of weather modification.

        Our tradition of leadership and innovation continues to direct our future. What started as two aircraft and two pilots has grown to nearly 40 aircraft and more than 80 team members. We continue to expand our services and products to meet emerging client needs. Over the last fifteen years, WMI has broadened its service offerings to include environmental monitoring and expanded atmospheric assessment and evaluation.

        Core values of quality, reliability, and innovation provide the framework for Weather Modification, Inc., These values, and our ever-changing planet, will continue to direct our team of scientists, meteorologists, electronics technicians, pilots, and maintenance engineers.

         

        OUR AFFILIATIONS

        CORPORATE MEMBER OF THE WEATHER MODIFICATION ASSOCIATION
        MEMBER OF THE U.S. SAUDI-ARABIAN BUSINESS COUNCIL
        CORPORATE MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
        MEMBER OF THE NORTH DAKOTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
        MEMBER OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF FARGO-MOORHEAD
        NORTH DAKOTA TRADE OFFICE ENDORSED EXPORTER

         

        Experienced Experts

        We believe that the professionals at Weather Modification, Inc., are the most experienced, most professional experts in the fields of atmospheric sciences and weather modification. Take a moment to learn more about the dedicated people behind the leaders in atmospheric research and evaluation.

        Patrick H. Sweeney

        Dennis M. Afseth

        Hans P. Ahlness

        James P. Sweeney

        Mike J. Clancy

        Terry W. Krauss

        Bruce A. Boe

        Allan W. Danielski

 

 

Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet, says John P. Holdren Obama´s science Car.

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/ 

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=576
Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens. 

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both? 

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar.

In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that: 

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not; 
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food; 
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise; 
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized. 
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force. 

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.

No one in their right mind would say such things. 

Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed. 

[UPDATE: Make sure to read the new statements issued by the White House and by John Holdren's office in response to the controversy raised by this essay -- you can see them below following the Ecoscience excerpts, or you can jump directly to the statements by clicking here.] 

This report was originally inspired by this article in FrontPage magazine, which covers some of the same information given here. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. Why not? Because, as I discovered when discussing the article with various friends, there was no proof that the quotes were accurate -- so most folks (even those opposed to Obama's policies) doubted their veracity, because the statements seemed too inflammatory to be true. In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence. 

Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time (late 1970s) was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: overpopulation. He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem. Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: personally, I don't think it's a valid excuse at all, since the crisis he was in a panic over was mostly in his imagination. Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible. 

Direct quotes from John Holdren's Ecoscience 

Below you will find a series of ten short passages from Ecoscience. On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me. 

Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context. 

And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans (and photos) of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context." 

Ready? Brace yourself. And prepare to be shocked. 

Page 837: 

Compulsory abortions would be legal 

Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.

As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded." Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that's whom. What Holdren's really saying here is, "I have determined that there's nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies."

And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there's no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for "compulsory population-control laws." In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that "the population crisis" has already become "sufficiently severe to endanger the society." 

Page 786:

Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions 

One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.

Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what's especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals -- wrenching babies from their mothers' arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not -- but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don't be fooled by the innocuous and "level-headed" tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed. 

Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily. 

This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I'm reminded of the phrase "banality of evil." 

Not that it matters, but I myself am "pro-choice" -- i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn't mean I'm pro-abortion -- I don't particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. One doesn't need to be a "pro-life" activist to see the horror of this proposal -- people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic. 

There's a bumper sticker that's popular in liberal areas which says: "Against abortion? Then don't have one." Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you're against it or not. 

Page 787-8:

Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock 

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.

OK, John, now you're really starting to scare me.

Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that'd be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government. 

Page 786-7: 

The government could control women's reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control 

Involuntary fertility control A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.  The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.

Note well the phrase "with official permission" in the above quote. Johh Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don't. 

Page 838:

The kind of people who cause "social deterioration" can be compelled to not have children 

If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.

To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book -- and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone -- but those who "contribute to social deterioration" could be "forced to exercise reproductive responsibility" which could only mean one thing -- compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to "force" people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people's bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No -- the only way to "force" people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions. 

But what manner of insanity is this? "Social deterioration"? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that "some" people contribute to social deterioriation more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn't that eugenics, plain and simple?

And isn't eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice? 

We've already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was "feeble-minded" and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity. 

The italicized phrase at the end ("providing they are not denied equal protection"), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn't be racially based or discriminatory -- merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren's America determines that you are "contributing to social deterioration" by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people. 

No no, you say, Holdren isn't claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he's stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more.

 If so -- how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or -- most disturbingly of all -- perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book. 

Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn't looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don't you just get your tubes tied already? But it's a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it's not so funny anymore. 

Page 838: 

Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size 

In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? 

Why? 

I'll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual's body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime? 

I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holgren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures. 

Page 942-3:

A "Planetary Regime" should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born 

Toward a Planetary Regime Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, andincluding all food on the international market.  The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.

In case you were wondering exactly who would enforce these forced abortion and mass sterilization laws: Why, it'll be the "Planetary Regime"! Of course! I should have seen that one coming. 

The rest of this passage speaks for itself. Once you add up all the things the Planetary Regime (which has a nice science-fiction ring to it, doesn't it?) will control, it becomes quite clear that it will have total power over the global economy, since according to Holdren this Planetary Regime will control "all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable" (which basically means all goods) as well as all food, and commerce on the oceans and any rivers "that discharge into the oceans" (i.e. 99% of all navigable rivers). What's left? Not much. 

Page 917: 

We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force 

If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involvespartial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.

The other shoe drops. So: We are expected to voluntarily surrender national sovereignty to an international organization (the "Planetary Regime," presumably), which will be armed and have the ability to act as a police force. And we saw in the previous quote exactly which rules this armed international police force will be enforcing: compulsory birth control, and all economic activity. 

It would be laughable if Holdren weren't so deadly serious. Do you want this man to be in charge of science and technology in the United States? Because he already is in charge. 

Page 749:

Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism 

Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the "tragedy of the commons," wherein the "commons" is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint.

This passage is not particularly noteworthy except for the inclusion of the odd phrase "pronatalist attitude," which Holdren spends much of the book trying to undermine. And what exactly is a "pronatalist attitude"? Basically it means the urge to have children, and to like babies. If only we could suppress people's natural urge to want children and start families, we could solve all our problems! 

What's disturbing to me is the incredibly patronizing and culturally imperialist attitude he displays here, basically acting like he has the right to tell every ethnic group in the world that they should allow themselves to go extinct or at least not increase their populations any more. How would we feel if Andaman Islanders showed up on the steps of the Capitol in Washington D.C. and announced that there were simply too many Americans, and we therefore are commanded to stop breeding immediately? One imagines that the attitude of every ethnic group in the world to John Holdren's proposal would be: Cram it, John. Stop telling us what to do. 

Page 944

As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000 

Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny.Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world.

This is the final paragraph of the book, which I include here only to show how embarrassingly inaccurate his "scientific" projections were. In 1977, Holdren thought we were teetering on the brink of global catastrophe, and he proposed implementing fascistic rules and laws to stave off the impending disaster. Luckily, we ignored his warnings, yet the world managed to survive anyway without the need to punish ourselves with the oppressive society which Holdren proposed. Yes, there still is overpopulation, but the problems it causes are not as morally repugnant as the "solutions" which John Holdren wanted us to adopt. 

I actually don't disagree with everything Holdren says. I agree with him that overpopulation is a problem, and that much of the environmental degradation that has happened is due in large part to overpopulation (mostly in the developing world). Where we disagree is in the solution. While Holdren does occasionally advocate for milder solutions elsewhere in the book, his basic premise is that the population explosion has gotten so out of control that only the most oppressive and totalitarian measures can possibly stop humanity from stripping the planet bare and causing a catastrophe beyond our imagining. Holdren has (apparently) no problem saying we should force people to not have children, by any means necessary. And that is where we part ways. I draw the line at even the hint of compulsory compliance to draconian laws about pregnancy and abortion; Holdren does not hesitate to cross that line without a second thought. 

My solution would be to adopt social policies that are known to lead to voluntary and non-coercive trends toward a lower birth rate: increased education for girls in poor countries, better access to (voluntarily adopted) birth control, higher standards of living. In fact, population trends since 1977 have started to level off in the crisis areas of Asia and Latin America, primarily due to better standards of living and better education, which are known to decrease population growth. These non-oppressive policies appear to be sufficient to control the population -- and Holdren's decades-long panic attack seems to be unfounded. 

Now, consider all the recommendations by Holdren given above, and then note that at his Senate confirmation hearing he said he would "keep policy free from politics" if confirmed. In fact Holdren has repeatedly said that science should not be be tainted by politics, telling the BBC just a few days ago that "he wanted to take the politics out of scientific advice." But have you ever seen more politicized science-policy recommendations than those given in Ecoscience? 

For the doubters and the naysayers...
There are five possible counter-claims which you might make against this report: 

1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax. 
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context. 
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them. 
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable. 
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now. 

I'll address each in turn:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax. 
Scroll to the bottom of this page, and look at the photos of the book -- especially the last two photos, showing the book opened to pages quoted in this report. Then look at the full-page scans directly above those photos, showing each page mentioned here in full, unaltered. What more proof do you need? If you're still not convinced, go to any large library and check out the book yourself, and you'll see: everything I claim here is true. 

If you don't have the patience to go to a library, you can always view the actual contents of the book online for free for a brief trial period. 

2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context. 
Some have argued that the FrontPage article "takes quotes out of context," which is the very reason why I went and investigated the original book itself. Turns out that not only are the quotes not out of context, but the additional paragraphs on either side of each passage only serve to make Holdren's ideas appear even more sinister. You want context? Be careful what you ask for, because the context makes things worse. 

But yes, to satisfy the curious and the doubters, the "extended passages" and full-page scans given below provide more than sufficient context for the quotes.
In truth, I weary of the "context game" in which every controversial statement is always claimed to be "out of context," and no matter how much context is then given, it's never enough, until one must present every single word someone has ever written -- at which point the reader becomes overwhelmed and loses interest. Which is the whole point of the context game to begin with. 

3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them. 
First of all: If you are a co-author of a book, you are signing your name to it, and you must take responsibility for everything that is in that book. This is true for John Holdren and every other author.
But there's plenty more evidence than that. Most significantly, Holdren has held similar views for years and frequently wrote about them under his own name. It's not like these quotes are unexpected and came out of the blue -- they fit into a pattern of other Holdren writings and viewpoints.
Lastly, below I present full-page scans of the "Acknowledgments" pages in Ecoscience, and in those Acknowledgments pages are dozens of thank-yous to people at U.C. Berkeley -- where Holdren was a professor at the time. In fact, there are more acknowledgments involving Berkeley than anywhere else, and since Holdren was the only one of the three authors with a connection to Berkeley, they must be histhank-yous -- indicating that he wrote a substantial portion of the book. Even his wife is thanked.
I have no way of knowing if Holdren himself typed the exact words quoted on this page, but he certainly at a minimum edited them and gave them his stamp of approval. 

4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable. 
Well, if you believe that, then I guess this page holds no interest for you, and you are thereby free to ignore it. But I have a suspicion that the vast majority of Americans find the views expressed by Holdren to be alarming and abhorrent. 

5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now. 
You might argue that this book was written in a different era, during which time a certain clique of radical scientists (including Holdren) were in a frenzy over what they thought was a crisis so severe it threatened the whole planet: overpopulation. But, you could say, all that is in the past, an embarrassing episode which Holdren might wish everyone would now forget. I mean, people change their opinions all the time. Senator Robert Byrd was once in the KKK, after all, but by now he has renounced those views. Perhaps in a similar vein John Holdren no longer believes any of the things he wrote in Ecoscience, so we can't hold them against him any more. 

The White House gets involved:

Recent statements byHoldren and the Ehrlichs in response

to this controversy 

When I originally wrote and published this essay on July 10, I said: 

"Unfortunately, as far as I've been able to discover, Holdren has never disavowed the views he held in the 1970s and spelled out in Ecoscience and other books." 

However, that is no longer entirely true. On July 15, both the White House and John Holdren's office issued statements on this controversy after prodding from reporters at both the Washington Times and the Catholic News Agency. 

According to this article by Amanda Carpenter in the Washington Times, Holdren and his co-authors have now distanced themselves from the words published in Ecoscience 32 years ago. From the article:

When asked whether Mr. Holdren's thoughts on population control have changed over the years, his staff gave The Washington Times a statement that said, "This material is from a three-decade-old, three-author college textbook. Dr. Holdren addressed this issue during his confirmation when he said he does not believe that determining optimal population is a proper role of government. Dr. Holdren is not and never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization." 
... 
The White House also passed along a statement from the Ehrlichs that said, in part, "anybody who actually wants to know what we and/or Professor Holdren believe and recommend about these matters would presumably read some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times, rather than going back a third of a century to find some formulations in an encyclopedic textbook where description can be misrepresented as endorsement."

(The second quote above is from page 2 of the article.) 

The Catholic News Agency also reported on July 15,

In Tuesday e-mails to CNA, Rick Weiss, the Office of Science and Technology Policy's Director of Strategic Communications, said the material at issue was from "a three-decade-old, three-author textbook used in colleges to teach energy policy." 

He could "easily dismiss" fears that Dr. Holdren favors government control over population growth. 

"He made that quite clear in his confirmation hearing," Weiss said. 

He then quoted a section of the confirmation transcript in which Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) asked Holdren whether he thinks "determining optimal population is a proper role of government." 

"No, Senator, I do not," was Holdren's reply, according to Weiss and a transcript of the proceedings. 

In other remarks at the confirmation hearing, not cited by Weiss, Holdren told Sen. Vitter he no longer thinks it is "productive" to focus on the "optimum population" for the United States. "I don't think any of us know what the right answer is." 

According to Weiss, Holdren "made clear that he did not believe in coercive means of population control" and is not an advocate for measures expressed in the book "and they are certainly not endorsed by this administration in any way." 

Weiss also provided CNA with a statement from the book's other two authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich. 

The Ehrlichs said they had been "shocked" at what they called the "serious misrepresentation" of their and Holdren's views. 

"We were not then, never have been, and are not now 'advocates' of the Draconian measures for population limitation described -- but not recommended -- in the book's 60-plus small-type pages cataloging the full spectrum of population policies that, at the time, had either been tried in some country or analyzed by some commentator." 

Describing "Ecoscience" as a "textbook," they said its descriptions can be "misrepresented as endorsement."

In my original report, I challenged Holdren "to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience." 

I ask my readers: Do you think these two articles count as the renunciation and disavowal I requested? 

I'm not so sure. First of all, the disavowals were made by a spokesman and by his co-authors -- as of this writing, Holdren himself has never renounced and disavowed the contents of Ecoscience. Unless you want to count the one-sentence answer he gave during the confirmation hearing. 

Under questioning from Senator David Vitter, Holdren did backpedal a bit concerning a different statement he made in the '70s about government-controlled population levels. Does this single sentence count as an across-the-board disavowal of every single specific recommendation he made in Ecoscience as well as in many other books and articles? My opinion is Not really, but as usual I'll provide the full evidence and the full context and I'll let you decide for yourself. 

You can view the video of the confirmation hearings here (introductory page here), but be warned that it is an extremely long streaming video that doesn't work in all browsers, and the answer in question doesn't come until the 120th minute.
Because most people won't or can't view the entire video, here's a transcript of the relevant part, and you can decide for yourself whether his statement counts as a disavowal of his quotes cited in this report: 

[Starting at 120:30]

Senator David Vitter: In 1973, you encouraged "a decline in fertility well below replacement" in the United States because "280 million in 2040 is likely to be too many." What would your number for the right population in the US be today? 

John Holdren: I no longer think it's productive, Senator, to focus on the optimum population of the United States. I don't think any of us know what the right answer is. When I wrote those lines in 1973, uh, I was preoccupied with the fact that many problems the United States faced appeared to be being made more difficult by the greater population growth that then prevailed. I think everyone who studies these matters understands that population growth brings some benefits and some liabilities; it's a tough question to determine which will prevail in a given time period.

Vitter then asked, "You think determining optimal population is a proper role of government?" To which Holdren replied, "No, Senator, I do not." 

(If you want the full context of this exchange between Vitter and Holdren, a complete transcript of their entire question-and-answer session can be found posted here.) 

I'm not sure just how seriously we should take a statement made by someone during what is essentially a job interview. A few words spent reassuring the interviewer that you don't really believe all those things you spent thirty years elaborating in detail -- what else should we expect? That Holdren would say, Yes, I think the government should lower the U.S. population down to 280 million? Of course he wouldn't say that during the interview, despite what he may or may not really believe internally. 

But let's spend a moment looking at these answers more closely. Both of them referred to determining a specific number of people that should be allowed as the population of the United States. First he said it was "no longer productive" to set a hard-and-fast exact number for the population of the U.S., and then said he doesn't think we should "determine the optimal population." But that still leaves the door open for the notion that the population should be lowered by whatever means in general without a specific numerical goal in mind. Holdren still did not say that he's against population control as a concept -- only that he thinks we shouldn't set specific numeric targets. 

And more importantly in the context of this essay, he did not disavow any of the specific proposals quoted here -- forced abortion, "Planetary Regime," etc. 

Rather than a fairly vague blanket disavowal given in response to a question on a slightly different topic during the confirmation hearings, and rather than a statement given by someone in his office, and rather than a statement issued by his co-authors, I still would like to see a specific disavowal by Holdren himself. And so I repeat,

I challenge John Holdren himself to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and specific recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience; and until he does so, I will hold him responsible for those statements.

Columnist David Harsanyi, who received a similar semi-disavowal from Holdren's office, dismantles it quite effectively in an excellent piece he published on July 15 in the Denver Post, Reason Online and elsewhere. 

And who wants to take up the challenge from the Ehrlichs issued by the White House to look into "some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times" to uncover "what we and/or Professor Holdren believe"? Seems like territory ripe for exploration. Post any research you uncover either here in the comments section at zomblog, or on your own blog. Anything that John Holdren or the Ehrlichs have written since 1977 is fair game -- according to the Ehrlichs themselves. 

Before you read any further...
If you accept the self-evident veracity of these quotations, and are outraged enough already, then you can stop reading here. Very little new information is presented below. 

(And if you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.)
But if you still harbor doubts that the United States Science Czar could possibly harbor such views, and want more proof, then read on for longer and fuller citations, and full-page scans of the pages in the book, as well as photographs of the book itself. And if by chance you are a Holdren or Obama supporter, and want to falsely claim that I have taken Holdren's statements out of context, then you'd better stop reading here too, because if you go any further then you'll see that I have given full context for the quotes and conclusive evidence that they're Holdren's -- removing any basis by which you could have questioned this report. 

More Context: Complete extended passages from which the quotes above were taken 

For most of these, I will present the following extended passages without further commentary -- judge for yourself if you think the context mitigates Holdren's intent, or only worsens the impression that he's completely serious about all this. 

Page 837 full-length extended quote: 

To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.

Let it be noted that John Holdren himself is among the few who "consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion" -- in fact, that's the entire thrust of Ecoscience, to convince everyone that overpopulation is a catastrophic crisis which requires immediate and extreme solutions. So although the final sentence of the extended passage seems at first to mollify the extreme nature of his speculation, in reality Holdren is only speaking of all the unaware masses who don't see things his way. 

Page 786 full-length extended quote: 

Social pressures on both men and women to marry and have children must be removed. As former Secretary of Interior Stewart Udall observed, "All lives are not enhanced by marital union; parenthood is not necessarily a fulfillment for every married couple." If society were convinced of the need for low birth rates, no doubt the stigma that has customarily been assigned to bachelors, spinsters, and childless couples would soon disappear. But alternative lifestyles should be open to single people, and perhaps the institution of an informal, easily dissolved "marriage" for the childless is one possibility. Indeed, many DC societies now seem to be evolving in this direction as women's liberation gains momentum. It is possible that fully developed societies may produce such arrangements naturally, and their association with lower fertility is becoming increasingly clear. In LDCs a childless or single lifestyle might be encouraged deliberately as the status of women approaches parity with that of men.  Although free and easy association of the sexes might be tolerated in such a society, responsible parenthood ought to be encouraged and illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged. One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even he possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.  Somewhat more repressive measures for discouraging large families have also been proposed, such as assigning public housing without regard for family size and removing dependency allowances from student grants or military pay. Some of these have been implemented in crowded Singapore, whose population program has been counted as one of the most successful.

In the final sentence of this passage, Holdren speaks approvingly of Singapore's infamous totalitarian micromanaging of people's daily lives. 

But to me, the most bizarre and disturbing aspect of the quote given here is that Holgren seems to think that economic disincentives to have large families are more repressive and extreme than taking away basic bodily rights. To Holdren, "removing dependency allowances from student grants" is more repressive than compelling women to have abortions against their will. A very peculiar and twisted view of the world, I must say. 

Page 787-8 full-length extended quote: 

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.  Physiologist Melvin Ketchel, of the Tufts University School of Medicine, suggested that a sterilant could be developed that had a very specific action—for example, preventing implantation of the fertilized ovum. He proposed that it be used to reduce fertility levels by adjustable amounts, anywhere from five to 75 percent, rather than to sterilize the whole population completely. In this way, fertility could be adjusted from time to time to meet a society's changing needs, and there would be no need to provide an antidote. Contraceptives would still be needed for couples who were highly motivated to have small families. Subfertile and functionally sterile couples who strongly desired children would be medically assisted, as they are now, or encouraged to adopt. Again, there is no sign of such an agent on the horizon. And the risk of serious, unforeseen side effects would, in our opinion, militate against the use of any such agent, even though this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children.  Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great).  Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries.

Page 786-7 full-length extended quote: 

Involuntary fertility control  The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birthrates are rapidly reversed by other means. Some involuntary measures could be less repressive or discriminatory, in fact, than some of the socioeconomic measure suggested.  ...  A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. This of course would be feasible only in countries where the majority of births are medically assisted. Unfortunately, such a program therefore is not practical for most less developed countries (although in China, mothers of three children are commonly "expected" to undergo sterilization).  The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. No capsule that would last that long (30 years or more) has yet been developed, but it is technically within the realm of possibility.

Page 838 full-length extended quote: 

It is accepted that the law has as its proper function the protection of each person and each group of people. A legal restriction on the right to have more than a given number of children could easily be based on the needs of the first children. Studies have indicated that the larger the family, the less healthy the children are likely to be and the less likely they are to realize their potential levels of achievement. Certainly there is no question that children of a small family can be cared for better and can be educated better than children of a large family, income and other things being equal. The law could properly say to a mother that, in order to protect the children she already has, she could have no more. (Presumably, regulations on the sizes of adopted families would have to be the same.)  A legal restriction on the right to have children could also be based on the right not to be disadvantaged by excessive numbers of children produced by others. Differing rates of reproduction among groups can give rise to serious social problems. For example, differential rates of reproduction between ethnic, racial, religious, or economic groups might result in increased competition for resources and political power and thereby undermine social order. If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.

Study this whole extended passage carefully for an extremely unsettling view into the legal brain of John Holdren. Some of the sentiments he expresses here are beyond the pale, and his legal reasoning boggles the mind. 

Page 838 full-length extended quote: 

Individual rights. Individual rights must be balanced against the power of the government to control human reproduction. Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right. Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce. Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the "right responsibly to choose" the number and spacing of children (our emphasis). In the United States, individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and it has been held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether or not to have children, at least to the extent that a woman has a right to choose not to have children. But the right is not unlimited. Where the society has a "compelling, subordinating interest" in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could he required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted.  It is often argued that the right to have children is so personal that the government should not regulate it. In an ideal society, no doubt the state should leave family size and composition solely to the desires of the parents. In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

This extended passage is a perfect example of how the "full context" of a short quote only makes it worse; once you see Holdren's complete elaboration on the idea, you realize it's not some flippant notion he tossed off, but something he feels deeply about. 

Page 942-3 full-length extended quote: 

Toward a Planetary Regime  ...  Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.  The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea an other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions.  The Planetary Regime might have the advantage over earlier proposed world government schemes in not being primarily political in its emphasis—even though politics would inevitably be a part of all discussions, implicitly or explicitly. Since most of the areas the Regime would control are not now being regulated or controlled by nations or anyone else, establishment of the Regime would involve far less surrendering of national power. Nevertheless it might function powerfully to suppress international conflict simply because the interrelated global resource-environment structure would not permit such an outdated luxury.

Page 917 full-length extended quote: 

If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible.

Full Context: High-res scans of all pages cited in this report 

Click on each of the images below to see the full-size scans of the pages mentioned in this report: 

Front cover

Back cover

Title page

Page 749

Page 786

Page 787

Page 788

Page 789

Page 837

Page 838

Page 839

Page 917

Page 942

Page 943

Page 944

Page 1001

Page 1002

Page 1003

 

Photographs of Ecoscience, inside and out 

Any finally, for the final proof that this is a real book co-authored by John Holdren --

and that these are real quotes from that book -- and not some elaborate hoax, here are some photographs (as opposed to scans) of the book itself: 

 

 

 

If you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog. 

 

Brzezinski’s Lament - ‘Jewish Lobby Controls Obama’

Brzezinski’s Lament - ‘Jewish Lobby Controls Obama’

Jewish Lobby Articles, ObamaNation Articles

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=483 

http://www.realzionistnews.com/ 

 

 

BRZEZINSKI’S LAMENT
‘JEWISH LOBBY CONTROLS OBAMA’
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2010

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner
& Link To Real Zionist News (SM)

Support Brother Nathanael! HERE

 
Or Send Your Contribution To:
Brother Nathanael Kapner; PO Box 1242; Frisco CO 80443
E-mail: [e-mail]

For The Best Alternative News CLICK: Rense.com Here
____________

SEEKING A GLOBAL SHOWDOWN with Russia and China, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who is recognized and feared by Zionist Jews as Obama’s foreign policy adviser, is intenton bringing Iran back into the Western orbit. In Brzezinski’s world view, Iran could be a valuable US asset to be played against Russia and China.

 

Even with his protege at Defense, Robert Gates, and his reputation as a global strategist, Brzezinski has all but admitted that he simply does not possess the influence to override the power the Jewish lobby wields over Obama’s decision-making in foreign affairs.

This has recently come to light in Brzezinski’s latest article for the Council of Foreign Relations, “From Hope To Audacity.”

Beginning his treatise with the premise that the US should not be at war with Islam, Brzezinski proceeds to take on the “Second Echelon” in Obama’s administration which includes Zionist Jews Dennis Ross, Special Adviser on Iran, Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff, and Zionist shill Hilary Clinton at State.

Ross, who enjoys close ties to Israel and a history of pushing hardline policies toward Iran, was recently promoted as a Senior Director of the National Security Council.

Opening himself in his article to further accusations of being an “Anti-Semite,” (Alan Dershowitz initiated the lie), Brzezinski challenges the Zionist status quo and adds insult to injury to his already stated position that Obama should negotiate with Hamas:

“It is not fashionable to say this, but much of the current hostility toward the US in the Middle East has been generated by the bloodshed and suffering produced by the prolonged Israeli-Arab conflict. Israel’s refusal to negotiate with the Palestinians in good faith compounds the problem.” View Entire Story Here.

Moving on in his essay to the “stalemate” in Obama’s policy regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Brzezinski goes toe to toe with the Jewish “insiders” at the White House:

“Obama’s two special advisers, David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel, participate in significant decision-making. Both of them sat in on the president’s critical September meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

As a result, Obama’s redefinition of US foreign policy is vulnerable to dilution by these upper-level officials who tend to yield to pressures from domestic interest groups.

This fosters a reluctance to plan for a firm follow-through on bold presidential initiatives should they encounter a foreign rebuff reinforced by powerful domestic lobbies. Netanyahu’s rejection of Obama’s demand that Israel halt the construction of settlements is a case in point.” View Entire Story Here.

In his concluding theme, “Domestic Impediments,” Brzezinski exposes the Jewish Lobby and their total control of Obama’s foreign policy decisions:

“Special interest lobbies have become overly influential in US politics. Thanks to their access to Congress, a variety of lobbies — some financially well endowed, some backed by foreign interests — have been promoting, to an unprecedented degree, legislative intervention in foreign-policy making.

Promoted by lobbies, Congress not only actively opposes foreign policy decisions but even imposes some on the president. The pending legislation on sanctions against Iran is but one example. Such congressional intervention makes it more difficult to ensure that US — not foreign — interests are the point of departure.” View Entire Story Here.

 

 

 

Congress JOINS Jewish Lobby In Anti-Iran Workshop

 EVER SINCE CONGRESS CONDEMNED GOLDSTONE’S GAZA REPORT

last winter, demanding by a 344-36 vote that Obama “refuse to endorse” Goldstone’sfindings of Israeli war crimes, Congress has joined with the Jewish Lobby in its efforts to crank up hysteria regarding Iran’s nuclear energy program.

On January 17, 2009, The Israel Project and the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington (and more than twenty similar Jewish Lobby groups of which there is NO end), hosted an anti-Iran workshop billed as, Israel Advocacy Training Institute: Spotlight Iran.

The event, held at the Melvin J. Berman Hebrew Academy in DC, focused on the “Iran threat,” emphasizing the “danger posed” by the country’s “aggressive pursuit of nuclear arms.” (Thus far, however, the world is only aware of Iran’s nuclear energy ambitions, but NO EVIDENCE of Iran’s “pursuit of nuclear arms” has emerged. So much for Jewish hysteria-hyping.)

Joining lead speaker Rabbi Jonah Layman, participants included not only the foreign government of Israel’s embassy ambassador, Dan Arbell, Deputy Chief of the Embassy of Israel in Washington DC, but a group of “Congressional legislative assistants” as well.

These Congressional staffers, led by Sarah Farhadian, Legislative Assistant for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, played a significant role in the workshop’s Congressional and Legislative Advocacy Session.

Farhadian, who has been the recipient of “private” Jewish money on at least two occasions in 2009, is known for her “partnership” with Chabad House, an ultra-religious/pro-Israel Jewish group. View Invitation, Schedule, & Pics Here & Here.

 

BRZEZINSKI & GATES CHALLENGE ZIONIST LINE ON IRAN

 

IN A RECENT ESSAY FOR CFR, entitled: “Iran: Time for a New Approach,”Brzezinski and co-author Robert Gates argue against the tenor of the Jewish-induced hysteria toward Iran, now being vomited by the Zionist screech owl, Elie Wiesel.

Rejecting Wiesel’s line that Iran is a threat to America’s security, Brzezinski and Gates contend that US interests would be better served by “selective engagement” with Tehran.

The following are excerpts from the essay and recent interviews with Brzezinski:

The use of military force against Iran would be extremely problematic given the dispersal of Iran’s nuclear sites throughout the country and their proximity to urban centers.

Since the US would be blamed for any Israeli strike, we should make it clear to Israel that American interests would be adversely affected by such a move.

Kremlin strategists would surely relish the thought of a US deeply bogged down in a war with Iran, which would trigger a dramatic spike in the price of oil, a commodity in plentiful supply in Russia.

Involving the Iranians in a military conflict would make our task in Afghanistan absolutely impossible. It would probably reignite the conflict in Iraq, would set the Persian Gulf ablaze, would increase the price of oil twofold, threefold, fourfold, and Americans will be paying five, six dollars a gallon at the gas stations. Europe will become even more dependent on Russia for energy.

So what is the benefit to us?

It will be a disaster for America in the short run and a fundamental disaster for Israel in the long run. If we are forced out of the region due to some sort of dynamic hatred that develops—and have no illusions about it, the conflict spreads—we’re going to be alone. The Russians are not going to be with us. They’re not suckers. Europe is not going to be with us either.

If we are finally driven out, how much would you bet on the survival of Israel for more than five to ten years after all that has happened?

Some criticize my straightforward stance calling me an ‘anti-Semite.’

Well, they’re entitled to their demagogy. But it will all end up as a geopolitical disaster for both America and Israel.

Rather than pursuing the current policy of confrontation and threats, Washington should work with Tehran to capitalize on both Iran’s potential economic influence due to its large endowment of energy resources and its unique position to advance the stability of its neighbors.

What is the alternative to negotiating? To go to war? – Is that a better solution?

Those who are making these arguments, the neo-conservatives, are doing it for their foreign patrons. They are afraid that we might negotiate with Iran peacefully whereas they would prefer us to go to war. 

View Entire Story Here, Here, Here Here & Here.

BOTTOM LINE FOR BRZEZINSKI & ALL AMERICANS: 

Not only is the White House and Capitol Hill owned by the Jews but the nations’ politicians have betrayed the will of their constituents by joining with and affirming the will of a tiny minority.

Who hijacked the democratic process in America?

Zionist Jews—whose influence calculated in billions of dollars have penetrated the offices, suites, and checking accounts of their treasonous puppets in Washington DC…

The Murderous Mossad and 9-11

http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/terror/192915-the-murderous-mossad-and-9-11 

The Israeli Mossad murder of a commander of the military wing of the Hamas (the democratically elected government of Palestine) is just one more provocation by the right-wing Zionist extremist government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.  The Israeli provocations on the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem are designed to foment a conflict in which the Israelis will escalate the violence. 

This is an extremely dangerous and illegal strategy which the United States and world should use every effort to arrest and prevent. 

Newspapers from the region are in agreement that Israel is acting to escalate the conflict and foment a war in the region:

Israel's plan to swallow Palestine has reached a peak... its project is to wipe Palestine from the map... an escalation rather than a settlement is looming in the region. 

– Al-Vefagh editorial (Iran)

The fresh Israeli aggression against the sanctity of the al-Aqsa mosque, and the attacks on worshippers by the Israeli security apparatus, represent the latest in a series of Israeli escalations over the past few weeks... they show that [Israel] is determined to escalate and even expand the conflict. 

– Al-Quds editorial (Palestine)

The US silence shows that ongoing attempts to resume negotiations have stalled and that those might have to wait until after a new Palestinian intifadah or even war. 

– Talal Akwal in Al-Ayyam (Palestine)

MOSSAD MADNESS

The Mossad has been at it again: The recent assassination of a Hamas military leader in Dubai looks conclusively like the Israelis' handiwork. No doubt, they hoped for a little more anonymity in the aftermath--they likely didn't expect the Dubai authorities to be quite so technologically competent...Either we are complicit or we are not--there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations.

- Melik Kaylan, "Mossad Madness", Forbes, February 26, 2010

Dubai's Police Chief Lt. Gen. Dhahi Khalfan Tamim identifies eleven of the 27 known suspects wanted in connection with the killing of a Hamas commander, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in a Dubai hotel room.

Tamim has called on Mossad Chief Meir Dagan to own up to his crime or deny Mossad's involvement in the murder.

The Dubai police have provided details about the stolen identities of the Mossad murderers and their arrival and departure routes.  Some of the killers came from and returned to Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy, and the United States. 

Will the United States, Switzerland, Germany, and the other nations involved investigate and pursue the Israeli killers that use their nations as bases? 

As Melik Kaylan says, "there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations."


A list of 26 Israeli Mossad agents wanted for the murder in Dubai - At least two of the suspects sought by Dubai police for the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh reportedly entered the U.S. shortly after the crime. 

One of the Israeli suspects entered the U.S. on February 14, carrying a British passport, while the other, with an Irish passport, entered the U.S. on January 21. Mabhouh's body was found in a Dubai hotel room on January 20. 

Will the Department of Homeland Security track down the Israeli killers in the United States?

There are lessons to be learned from the murder of a Hamas leader in Dubai.  The information provided about the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh by the authorities of Dubai has shown the world that their police force is technologically competent and professional. 

The detailed information provided by the police of Dubai about the suspects involved in the al-Mabouh murder is the result of a police investigation using normal procedures, yet it is far superior to any of the information provided by the FBI about the 19 alleged terrorist hijackers of 9-11, who have been blamed for killing some 3,000 Americans. 

 Are the police of Dubai that much more competent and professional than the FBI or is there another reason why U.S. law enforcement seems so incompetent when dealing with Israeli crimes?

The murder of al-Mabouh is, like the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11, evidently a crime committed by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad.  In both cases there is clear evidence of Israeli involvement.  In the Dubai murder case the authorities have come forward with detailed information and begun an international effort to identify and locate the suspects.

 In the "non-investigation" of 9-11, on the other hand, headed by Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed while key terrorism suspects like Dominic Suter and Kobi Alexander were allowed to flee to Israel and were not pursued.

Michael Chertoff, son of an Israeli Mossad agent, oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 in which prime suspects were allowed to flee to Israel and crucial evidence was confiscated and destoyed.

The response by law enforcement authorities in the two cases could hardly be more different.  Unlike the police of Dubai, when pursuing Israeli criminals the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI are dogs that won't bark - or hunt.  Why is that?

ISRAEL IN AMERICA

To understand why American Jews are willing to commit and cover-up serious crimes, even treason, on behalf of the state of Israel one needs to understand that most religious Jews in America are first obliged to serve Israel - a foreign state.  American Jews are, for this reason, conflicted.  Their religion obliges them to make "aliya" and live in Israel but most would prefer to stay in the United States. 

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have chosen to leave "the Jewish state" and now live in the United States. 

While they are unwilling to leave the comfort of the United States and immigrate to Israel (aliya), most religious Jews in the United States feel strongly compelled to support and defend the state of Israel.

To fulfill their obligation to the state of Israel, Zionist Jews in America have created hundreds of organizations to raise funds and support for the Zionist state in Palestine.  These organizations are consolidated under an umbrella organization called the Jewish Agency. 

The Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization are two parts of the same Zionist enterprise that operates in the United States and around the world. 

The Jewish Agency was the Zionist organization that became the state of Israel in 1948 when a Jewish state was established in Palestine. 

The Jewish Agency, then headed by David Ben Gurion, literally became the apparatus of the Zionist state and Ben Gurion became the first prime minister of Israel.

The Jewish Agency, headquartered in New York City after World War II, organized and funded the Haganah, the Zionist militia in Palestine, as well as the terrorist groups known as the Irgun and LEHI (the Stern Gang).  Using these groups, the Jewish Agency created the Mossad LeAliyah Bet (the Agency for Illegal Immigration) in 1938 to smuggle illegal Jewish immigrants and weapons into Palestine.  The Jewish Agency and the Mossad worked together to bring many thousands of Jews to Palestine - illegally - from Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, and Europe. 

The Jewish Agency was the Mossad.

The Jewish Agency and the Mossad continued to work together after the creation of the state of Israel to bring Jews to the Zionist state.  The hard-line Zionists who run Israel today are actually fighting a losing battle with demographics.  The Arab population around them is growing quickly while many Israelis are leaving the Jewish state. 

The Israeli population has become more Russian, more extremist, and less Western in its outlook than at any time since the founding of the state in 1948.  Ariel Sharon, the now comatose prime minister who ran Israel in 2001, dreamed of bringing one million Jews to Israel from the United States.  In this effort he worked closely with the Jewish Agency.

The current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is a dangerous extremist who said 9-11 was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations on the very day of the attacks.  Netanyahu has openly advocated mass expulsions of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories.  During a 1989 lecture at Bar Ilan University, he said: "Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions of the Arabs of the territories."  Later, he stated, "I still believe that there are opportunities to expel many people."

FEINBERG AND THE JEWISH AGENCY

Kenneth Feinberg was the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. 

He alone was responsible for distributing some $7 billion of taxpayer money to the families of the victims of 9-11.  In this he was supported by some 30 lawyers from his law firm and his wife, Diane "Dede" Shaff Feinberg.  Diane is also an executive member of the United Israel Appeal and the Jewish Federation of Washington.  She also happens to be a member of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency - the parent organization of the Mossad.

Diane Shaff Feinberg, Governor of the Jewish Agency

The non-investigation of 9-11 was controlled by Michael Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent and an orthodox rabbi.  Chertoff oversaw the destruction of the thousands of tons of steel from the World Trade Center - crucial evidence that was shipped to Asian smelters and melted down.  While Chertoff destroyed the evidence of 9-11, government appointed doctors prescribed Prozac for the grieving relatives and Kenneth Feinberg began his war of attrition on the 9-11 families.

As the sole person responsible for distributing the money from the Victims Compensation Fund, Feinberg paid out nearly $7 billion to families in compensation - if they would sign the agreement not to sue the airlines or the Israeli airport security firm involved in 9-11 (Huntleigh USA/ICTS). 

More than 98 percent of the families accepted the money from the Feinberg-managed fund.  The amounts of the payments and the amounts paid to Diane Feinberg and the 30 lawyers are not known. 

The American people deserve to know how the funds were used and who got paid.

Diane and Kenneth Feinberg were co-chairmen of the recent General Assembly of the Jewish Federation, which hosted Israeli leaders involved in terrorism.

Feinberg's actions were crucial to removing more than 98 percent of the families from the litigation process.  Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein have waged a war of attrition against the 9-11 relatives. 

Of the thousands of families that could have used the courts to find justice and legal discovery for what happened on 9-11, Feinberg was successful in removing 98 percent.  Of the 96 families that chose to go to court, all but one or two cases have settled out of court after enduring years of obstruction in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein. 

Thanks to Feinberg and Hellerstein there may never be a trial for a single victim of 9-11.

Alvin K. Hellerstein has obstructed justice for the 9-11 families who chose to use the courts rather

than take the fund - or the Prozac.

Kenneth Feinberg is known for wearing expensive Brioni suits, smoking Cuban cigars, and driving his black Jaguar to his home in Bethesda, Maryland, where he has avoided paying taxes thanks to a few legal loopholes he knows about. 

Kenneth Feinberg was the co-chair (along with his wife) of a recent Zionist event in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, two prime suspects in the Israeli terrorism of 9-11, participated.  Feinberg's role in covering up the truth about 9-11 is connected to his relationship to the state of Israel.  Kenneth Feinberg wasn't working pro bono on the 9-11 victims fund out of compassion for the victims of 9-11, or for America.  He was doing it to serve Israel and the murderous Mossad.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Middle Eastern anger at Israeli escalations”, BBC News, March 1, 2010
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543120.stm

 

“Benjamin Netanyahu”, Institute for Middle East Understanding, September 29, 2008
http://imeu.net/news/article0014362.shtml

Cummins, Chip, "Two Dubai Suspects Traveled to U.S." Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704089904575093881279902928.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular#articleTabs%3Darticle

Feinberg, Diane and Kenneth, The Leadership of the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, Washington D.C., November 8-10, 2009
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/press_photos.html
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/

Ford, Henry, "The Jewish Question in Current Testimony" (The International Jew), Dearborn Independent, August 27, 1921
http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/Ford/original/ij75.html

Gibbon, Edward, "The Conduct of the Roman Government towards the Christians from the Reign of Nero to that of Constantine", The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Strahan & Cadell, London, 1776 

Kaylan, Melik, "Mossad Madness", Forbes.com, February 26, 2010
http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/25/mossad-israel-dubai-attack-opinions-columnists-melik-kaylan.html

Nahmias, Roee, "Dubai police to Mossad chief: Confess to Mabhouh murder or issue denial", Ynet News.com, February 27, 2010
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3855160,00.html

BANVÆN BÓLUEFNI OG CHEMTRAILS

Chemtrails and Deadly Vaccines:

http://www.chimachine4u.com/chemtrails.html 

AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf. YFIRLÝSING FRAMKVÆMDASTJÓRA FLUGFÉLAGS UM ÚÐUN KEMÍSKRA EFNA ÚT Í ANDRÚMSLOFTIÐ. Video og myndir.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1009748/ 

SJOKKERANDI  VIÐVÖRUN – FÓSTURLÁT AF VÖLDUM H1N1 SVÍNA FLENSU BÓLUEFNISINS.

 http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/986349 

The air we breath and the vaccinations we receive are both poisoned with chemicals linked to Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, MS, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, Cancer, Diabetes, Arthritis and AIDS. Chemtrails and vaccines are silent deadly killers.

CHEMTRAILS OG BÓLUEFNI ERU ÞÖGLIR MORÐINGJAR. This outstanding article makes it crystal clear what we are up against. We can't do anything about chemtrails, but we can refuse vaccinations.

FYI:

DO NOT GET VACCINATED FOR GARDASIL  IT HAS ALREADY CAUSED DEATHS AND  HEALTH COMPLICATIONS –

EKKI LÁTA BÓUSETJA ÞIG MEÐ GARDASIL – ÞAÐ HEFUR NÚ ÞEGAR OIÐ DAUÐA OG AUKAVERKUNUM-

Another corporate money making machine.

2) H1N1
Vitamin D (and C) protects the body from flu – Please get out into the sunshine for 20 mins a day and eat fish as often as possible. If you don't like fish and you receive little sunshine, 2,000 units of vitamin D every day is recommended. 

DO NOT GET VACCINATED.

EKKI LÁTA BÓLUSETJA ÞIG.

The H1N1 virus was created in laboratories and the vaccine patented by Baxted International BEFORE the 'Swine Flu' was unleashed in Mexico!!!

For further details please read these links:
http://swineflu.mercola.com/sites/swineflu/home.aspx
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/51913.php
http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/25191

 

SHOCKING INFORMATION - EVERYONE MUST READ!

 

SJOKKERANDI UPPLÝSINGAR SEM ALLIR ÆTTU AÐ LESA!!!!!

 Protect yourself and your loved ones:

 

VERNDAÐU SJÁLFAN ÞIG OG ÁSTVINI ÞÍNA. 

 

CHEMTRAILS:EFNARÁKIR
In 1946, future pharmaceutical czar George Merckreported to the US Secretary of War, that he'd managed to weaponise the toxin extracted from the Brucella bacterium and to isolate it into an indestructible crystalline form using only the DNA particles.

Árið 1946, þá skýrði George Merck síðar lyfjaframleiðslu einræðisherra frá því til  US Secretary of War að honum hefði tekist að vopnavæða eitur þykkni frá Brucella bakteríunni og að einangra það í óslítandi kristal form með því að nota einungis DNA agnir.

Aerial spraying of the crystals via chemtrails was deployed on Chinese and Korean populations during the Korean War.

Úðun úr lofti með bakterúnni í kristal formi gegnum "chemtrails" var  beitt á Kínverska og Kóreska íbúa á meðan á Kóreu stríðinu stóð.

Many veterans of the war later developed Multiple Sclerosis.

MARGIR HERMENN SEM VORU Í STRÍÐINU FENGU SÍÐAR HEILA OG MÆNUSIGG (MS) 

The army recognized that the MS was Brucella-related and paid the veterans compensation. Although the Brucella micoplasma can lay dormant for decades, it can be triggered by vaccines. 

Herinn viðurkenndi að MS tengdist Brucella og greiddi hermönnunum bætur. Þó svo að Brucella  micoplasma geti legið í dvala í áratugi, þá getur það losnað úr læðingi við bólusetningar.

Interview with Son of A Bio-warfare Scientist

MJÖG SJOKKERANDI!!!!!!! EN MEIKAR ÞOKKALEGAN SENS FYRIR OKKUR SEM FYLGJUMST MEÐ CHEMTRAILS  (EFNARÁKIR) OG INNIHALDI BÓLUEFNA ..

 

 

Vaccines have been mandatory in the USmilitary since 1911.

Besides MS,this bacterium has been linked to a variety of diseases including;AIDS, cancer, diabetes, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and arthritis. 

Fyrir utan MS, þá hefur þessi bakteríaverið tengd við fjölda sjúkdóma, þar á meðal; AIDS, sykursýki, Parkinson´s,Azheimer og gigt. 

In 2000, Dr.Charles Engel of the National Institute of Health stated that the brucellamycoplasma was probably responsible for chronic fatigue syndrome andfibromyalgia as well.

Árið 2000 hélt Dr. Charles Engel hjá National Institute of Health því fram að Brucella Mycoplasma væri líklega orsakavaldur síþreytu og vefjagigtar.

MOSQUITOES:

Government mosquitoes raised to carry disease.

Stjórnvöld hafa ræktað moskíto flugur til að bera sjúkdóma. 

In addition to the aerosol vector,mosquitoes were heavily tested as pathogen dispersal agents. In the 1950s, the Dominion Parasite Laboratory in Belleville, Canada was raising 100 million mosquitoes per month.

 Auk þess að vera  í úðunarformi /spray, voru moskíto flugur reyndar alvarlega sem sjúkdómsvaldur í dreifingar formi. Á fimmta áratugnum ræktaði Dominion Parasite Laboratory in Belleville, Canada  um 100 miljónir móskító flugna í hverjum mánuði. 

They were then shipped to Queens University in Kingston and other facilities where they wereinfected with the crystalline disease agent.

Þeim var síðan skipað út til  QueensUniversity in Kingston ogannarra fyrirtækja þar sem þær voru sýktar af hinum sjúkdómsvaldandi krystal.

 A large outbreak of chronicfatigue was reported in 1957 in Punta Gorda, Florida. The previous week a huge influx of mosquitoes was reported. The National Institute of Health (NIH)stated that 450 persons became ill with chronic fatigue within the month.

Árið 1957 var skýrt frá  því að síþreytu faraldur herjaði á fólk í Punta Gorda, Florida. Alþjóðlega Heilbrigðismála stofnunin fullyrti að 450 manns myndu veikjast af síþreytu innan  mánaðar.

Many such tests have been carried outon civilians over the last 50 years. Dr. Maurice Hilleman, Merck's current chief virologist,stated recently that the Brucella pathogen is now carried by everyone in NorthAmerica and possibly the world.

Núverandi yfirmaður örveirudeidar  Merck´s  Dr. Maurice Hilleman, fullyrti það nýlega að sjúkdómsvaldinn Brucella gengu allir  Norður Ameríku íbúar með og trúlega alir í heiminum ...

In 1993, Dr. Shyh-Ching Lo, senior researcher at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology patented several virulent strains ofmycoplasma. He stated in his own patents that they cause chronicfatigue syndrome. 

Árið 1993 fékk  Dr. Shyh-Ching Lo aðal rannsóknaraðili við Meinafræði stofnun hersins  (Armed Forces Institute of Pathology) einkaleyfi á fjölda afbrigða af mycoplasma,. Hann hélt því fram í sínum eigin einkaleyfum að þau yllu krónískri síþreytu.

The Institute is currentlyreconstructing the 1918 Spanish Flu, inserting it into contemporary  flustrains and enhancing its lethality.

Stofnunin er núna að  endurskapa Spönsku veikina 1918 (flensuna), sem bætt er í samtíma flensu afbrigði  til þess að efla banvænan eiginleika hennar.

The Spanish Flu killed 675,000  Americans in the 1918-1919 interval. Many ofthe dead were vaccinated soldiers.

Spænska fensan drap 675.000 Ameríkana (INNSKOT AGNÝ. Góð fólksfækkun þar.) á árunum 1918-1919 . Margir hinna látnu voru hermenn,,  (AGNY innskot.Ýmsir halda  því fram að Spanish Flu sé fyrsta sýklavopnið, en því hafi bara verið dreift  aðeins of seint..í lok stríðsins  og jafnt á óvini sem samherja..svo þegar  hermennirnir fóru heim þegar stríðinu lauk  þá báru þeir sjúkdóminn með  sér..Þetta gæti verið ástæðan fyrir hraðri útbreiðslu flensunnar og á  heimsvísu.. Skoðið hvað margir sjúkdómar eiga rætur sínar  og uppruna frá  herstöðvum..samanber svína flensuna )

 Anyone born after 1918 has no immunityto the Spanish Flu.

Allir  sem fæddir eru eftir 1918 hafa ekki mótefni gegn Spönsku veikinni (flensunni).

Since9-11 all US airports have been under military control.

Síðan 911 hafa allir flugvellir í US  verið undir stjórn hersins.

According to one credible source, there  is a subrosa project  known as 'Project  Cloverleaf'  that uses domestic air carriers retrofitted with special tanks to spray civilian populations with a variety of  chemicals.

SAMKVÆMT EINNI ÁREIÐANLEGRI HEIMILD ER ÁFERÐINNI SUBROSA (?) VERKEFNI, ÞEKKT SEM "PROJECT CLOVERLEAF"  

ÞAR SEM AMENNINGS FLUGVÉLAR  HAFA  VERIÐ ÚTBÚNAR SÉRSTÖKUM TÖNKUM SEM ERU NOTAÐAR TIL ÞESS AÐ DREIFA MISMUNANDI  KEMÍSKUM EFNUM YFIR ALMENNING!!!!

 (AGNY INNSKOT NÚ..AUÐVITAÐ Á DÝR OG PLÖNTUR..KANSKI  SÚRT REGN SÉ AF ÞESSUM ORSÖKUM??)

 A LINK BETWEEN CHEMTRAILS AND  VACCINATIONS:

Tengsl á milli Chemtrails og  bólusetninga.
This retired government scientist goes on to say that reconstructed versions of the flu could be  inserted into vaccines along with a more benign strain of the inoculum in order  to slow the progression of its more deadly component. Chemicals in the chemtrails reported nationwide over the preceding decade, may assist the viral envelope  to fuse with lung cells, guaranteeing ease of penetration and  infection. 

Þessi vísindamaður hja ríkisstjórnininni  sem kominn er á eftirlaun, gengur svo langt að segja að endurbyggða afbrigðið  af flensunni (spænsku) gæti verið bætt við í bóluefnin ásamt meira góðkynjaðra  afbrigði til sáningar í þeim tilgangi að hægja á framrás hins  banvæna þáttar. Kemísku efnin  í chemtrails/efnarákum  sem skýrt hefur verið frá á  síðusta áratug á landsvísu,  gætu verið að aðstoða veiru umslagið til að samþættast frumum lungnanna,tryggjandi skarpari samþættingu og smitun..

People will pass along the flu to  others and then start dropping like flies. This will cause a panic demand for  more flu shots, thus accelerating the cycle. Persons not so inoculated will be blamed for spreading the disease.

Fólk mun síðan dreifa  flensunni til annarra og síðan byrja að hrynja niður sem flugur væru. Þetta mun  valda panikk/ótta og kröfu um meiri flensu bólusetningar, en það mun hraða  hringrásinni..

Fólki  sem er van-eða óbólusett mun síðan verða kennt um að breiða út sjúkdóminn!!..

( INNSKOT AGNÝ.HALLÓ!!! Sko...til hvers Í FJÁRANUM  eru þá bóluefni? ..Mér er spurn.. ef að þeir sem eru óbólusettir eru hættulegir  fyrir  þá sem eru bólusettir í bak og fyrir?    Hvernig getur eitt óbólusett barn  verið ógnun við heilsu allra bólusettu barnanna í þeim skóla sem viðkomandi barn sækir um inngöngu í..Nú eða þú á vinnustað...HVAR ER  RÖKFRÆÐIN?..

HVERNIG Á ÓBÓLUSETT BARN AÐ GETA SÝKT  BÓLUSETT

BÖRN? ÞAÐ ER AÐ SEGJA FÁI ÞAÐ BARN EINHVERN

ÞESSARRA SMITSJÚKDÓMA...

 

In 2002 the Department of Health and Human Services purchased 286 million doses of vaccinefrom British supplier Acambis. The Washington Post reported in September ofthat year that the entire population of the United States could be vaccinatedwithin 5 days.

Concomitantly, the Department drafted alaw known as The Model Emergency Health Powers Act. 

The Act can demand that any individualbe vaccinated.

LÖGIN GETA  KVEÐIÐ Á AÐ HVER  EINSTAKLINGUR  SÉ BÓLUSETTUR.

Failure to complywill be considered a felony.

AР UPPFYLLA ÞAÐ EKKI, VERÐUR LITIÐ Á SEM GLÆP.

The latest wonder cure promoted by themedical establishment isgeneticvaccines.

NÝJASTA  LÆKNINGA  UNDRIÐ SEM KYNNT ER AF HEILGBRIGÐIS  GEIRANUM ERU / ERFÐAEFNIS (DNA)  BÓLUEFNI.

They are hailed as the last line ofdefence between humans and mycoplasma. But Dr. Rebecca Carley declares that the DNA components in these vaccines can be incorporated into our own DNA which in turn could cause the extinction of all (vaccinated) lifeon earth.

 EN  Dr. Rebecca Carley FULLYRÐIR AÐ DNA (ERFÐAEFNIS) SAMSETNINGIN Í ÞESSUM  BÓLUEFNUM GETI SAMEINAST OKKAR EIGIN DNA SEM Í STAÐINN GÆTI OLLIÐ EYÐINGU ALLS  LÍFS Á JÖRÐINNI.

THE  DEAD CAN'T PROTEST:

Þeir látnu geta ekki  mótmælt.

Dr. David Kelly - murdered. /MYRTUR

Dead Scientists DO TellTales

http://www.stevequayle.com/dead.scientist.news.html#Anchor-49575 

At least two  dozen microbiologists around the world have died violently in the last few  years.

Í  ÞAÐ MINNSTA HAFA 2 TUGIR ÖRVEIRUFRÆÐINGA VÍTT OG BREITT UM VERÖLDINA LÁTIST Á  VOFVEIFEGAN HÁTT Á SÍÐUSTU ÁRUM. 

( INNSKOT AGNÝ.Síðan 2001 þá eru þeir trúlega orðnir um 200 og allir á hinn  undarlegasta hátt..Enginn af "eðlilgum" orsökum..Greinilega ekki  hollt heilsu og lífi þeirra á neinn hátt..að vinna í þessum geira!)

Curiously, some of them were working onDNA sequencing.

MERKILEGT  NOKK..ÞÁ VORU SUMIR ÞEIRRA AÐ VINNA AÐ DNA  RAÐGREININGU.

The most famous was Dr. David Kelly  (Dr Kelly was said to have swallowed 29 coproxamol tablets, only one-fifth of one tablet was found in his stomach, and  the level found in his blood was far less than a fatal dose) who died in  July 2003.

Working for the Mossad, Kelly  orchestrated the defection of Russian microbiologist Vladimir Pasechnik, who had been working on a  doomsday biological weapon capable of destroying one third of the  planet's population.

In October 2004, Dmtry Lvov, head of the Russian  Virology Institute declared that up to one billion people around  the world could die during the next pandemic.

ÍOKTOBER 2004, LÝSTI  Dmtry Lvov YFIRMAÐUR  RÚSSNESKU

VEIRU STOFNUNARINNAR  AÐ ALLT AÐ BILJÓN MANNS UM

ALLAN HEIM MYNDI LÁTAST Í NÆSTA HEIMSFARALDRI! 

It would appear that the human herd is  about to be culled in spectacular fashion.

ÞAР LÍTUR ÞANNIG ÚT AÐ HIN MENNSKA HJÖRÐ SÉ UM ÞAÐ

BIL AÐ VERÐA MÓTUÐ  Í VISSA GERÐ.. 

For whatever reasons, the dead  microbiologists wouldn't go along with the program.

HVER SEM ÁSTÆÐAN VAR, ÞÁ VILDU HINIR LÁTNU 

ÖRVEIRUFRÆÐINGAR EKKI FRAMFYLGJA PROGRAMMINU.. 

In order to ensure maximum confusion,an edition of the New York Times from January 2002 reported that the US  government had seen  fit to  declassify  hundreds of germ warfare cook  books.

Til þess að valda sem mestum ruglingi, þá segir í grein New York

Times  from January 2002 að US stjórnvöld hafi séð ástæðu til

þess gera hundruðir  sýklahernaðar „matreiðslubóka“ að

leyniskjölum.

Although Lee Harvey Oswald's bank account information is sealed for another50 years, federal agencies have been routinely selling biowarfare documents toresearchers through the Internet and even over the telephone.

ÞÓ SVO AÐ BANKA REIKNINGUR LEE  OSWALLD

HARVEY SÉ INNSIGLAÐUR Í 50 ÁR Í VIÐBÓT, ÞÁ

HAFA RÍKISSTOFNANIR VERIÐ AР SELJA

REGLUEGA SÝKLAVOPNA SKJÖL TIL

RANNSÓKNARAÐILA  GEGNUM   INTERNETIР

OG JAFNVEL  Í GEGNUM SÍMA...

DEADLY  VACCINE COCKTAIL:

BANVÆNN BÓLUEFNA KOKTEILL.

The Times reported on the dangers of  tainted vaccines as far back as February 1962. It turns out that the  polio vaccines of the 50's and 60's were virally  contaminated with  diseased monkey kidney tissue, possibly accounting for the huge spike in cancer  cases there  after.

But vaccines don't require taintedmonkey tissue to be considered dangerous. En bóluefni þarfnast ekki mengaðs (nýrna)vefs úr öpum til að geta veriðtalin  hættuleg. 

The Physician's Desk Reference for 1998 lists any number of toxic vaccine ingredients including; formaldehyde, aluminium,phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) and human diploid cells (from aborted fetal  tissue).

Innocent Africans are deliberately infected.

SAKLAUSIR  AFRÍKU  BÚAR ERU  SÝKTIR  VILJANDI. 

AIDS- PAID TO KEEP QUIET:

AIDS - BORGAР FYRIR  AР ÞEGJA.
In May of 1987 theaustere Times of London reported on its front page that the smallpox vaccine  administered by the World Health Organization ( WHO) had triggered AIDS. 100 million vaccinated Africans  were at risk. 

Areas with the largest  amount of inoculations showed the greatest concentrations of AIDS cases. Robert Gallo was quoted in the  article as endorsing the figures and stating that, "AIDS  researchers will keep their mouths shut because they are paid to do so." 

In 1992 WHO director David Heymann stated that,

"The origin of AIDS is of no  importance to science today."

 

"UPPRUNI  AIDS SKIFTIR  VÍSINDIN EKKI MÁLI Í DAG. "

In 1995 the Catholic charitable  organization Human Life  International accused the WHO of attempting population control inAfrica and elsewhere.

Gulf War Syndrome -Killing Their Own.

VACCINES LINKED TO GULF WAR SYNDROME:

BÓLUEFNI  TENGD VIÐ PERSAFLÓA STRÍÐS SJÚKDÓMA.

 

The Times also reported last December that Gulf War Syndrome had been positively linked to vaccines.  More than 100,000  veterans currently suffer from the syndrome contracted in 1991 during Desert  Storm. Over 20,000 veterans have died so far - tens of thousands more  will be infected from the current Iraq and Afghanistan illegal US war and  occupation. Last March, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical  scientist and dean of a Nigerian university took samples of the latest WHO  vaccine to India for analysis.

 Serious contaminants were found  including sterility agents.

ALVARLEG MENGUN FANNST ÁSAMT ÓFRJÓSEMIS  EFNUM.

 

Governmentvaccine experiments using children.The Nazis conducted the sameexperimentation's.

Stjórnvöld nota börn í tilraunum fyrir  bóluefni. Nasistar gerðu

 sömu tilraunir. 

CHILDREN USED AS LAB RATS:

BÖRN NOTUÐ SEM TILRAUNA ROTTUR.

In April 2000the Observer newspaper reported that the pharmaceutical leviathanGlaxoSmithKline sponsored experiments on children at Incarnation Children'sCenter in New York City. 

Children asyoung as four were given multi-drug cocktails.

Börn allt  niður í 4 ára voru gefnir fjöl-lyfja kokteilar.

In other  experiments, six-month old babies were injected with double doses of a measles vaccine. 

Í annrri  tilraun, þá voru 6. mán börn bólusett með tvöföldum  skammti af mislinga  bóluefni.

More than 100  orphans and babies were used in 36 experiments.

MEIRA EN 100 MUNAÐARLEYSINGJAR OG BÖRN VORU NOTUÐ Í 36 TILRAUNUM.

This sort of  experimentation has occurred with increasing frequency.

Þessi  tegund  af tilraunum á sér stað í æ auknari mæli.

Last year the  Environmental Protection Agency received $2.1 million from the American Chemistry Council to conduct studies on children from impoverished families in  Duval County, Florida.

Á síðasta ári fékk Umhverfisverndar stofnunin (Environmental Protection  Agency) $2.1 American  Chemistry Council til að framkvæma rannsóknir á börnum  frá fátækum fjölskyldum í  Duval sýslu Florida. 

The children  will be exposed to a variety of known toxins over a two year period. 

Börnin munu verða látin verða fyrir  áhrifum frá fjölda  þekktra eiturefna yfir tveggja ára tímabil.

The study will  determine how chemicals are absorbed, ingested and inhaled by children rangingin age from infants to 3 year olds. For taking part in the study, families will receive $970 and a tee-shirt (and  later on a dead child).

Rannsóknin  tekur mið af því hvernig efnin eru  tekin upp, neytt eða andað að sér af börnum á aldrinum nyfædd  til 3 ára.  Fyrir að taka þátt í tilrauninni  munu fjölskyldur fá $970 og T-shirt (og síðar andvana barn)

 

What can be done ...HVAР ER  HÆGT  AÐ GERA?

REFUSE INOCULATION:

NEITA  BÓLUSETNINGU.
Many parents believe that they can not enrol their children in school  without having them inoculated. But vaccines have always been voluntary.

Margir foreldrar telja að þeir geti ekki  innritað börn sín í skóla án þess að láta bólusetja þau. En bólusetningar hafa alltaf verið sjálfviljugar.

Dr. Zoltan  Rona says that parents must demand exemption forms from school administrators.  Exemptions can be made for spiritual or religious reasons.

Rona states that parents may have to insist on  having a vaccination waiver or declination form, and then have it notarized inorder to present to school officials.

FACT: You do NOT have to have your child vaccinated! 

STAÐREYND: Þú þarft EKKI  að látabólusetja barnið þitt!

 

Children without vaccinations grow to behealthier adults.

Óbólusett börn verða að heilbrigðum  fullorðnum

einstaklingum. 

DOCTORS ARE LICENSED DRUG DEALERS:

LÆKNAR  ERU  EITURLYFJASALAR  MEР SKÍRTEINI:

Also, before  consulting a doctor, it may be prudent to consider the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association vol. 284 July 26, 2000.

Therein isstated with astonishing frankness that American medical doctors areresponsible for 250,000 deaths per year.

ÞAR  INNI  SEGIR AÐ AMERÍSKIR  LÆKNAR SÉU ÁBYRGIR FYRIR 250.000 DAUÐSFÖUM Á HVERJU ÁRI.

Half of these deaths areattributed to the negative effects of wrongfully prescribed drugs. Interestingly, in the opening statement of the Hippocratic Oath, doctors  make a declaration to a Greek God, Apollo.

In the Greek  vernacular, the word Apollo means destroyer.

Á GRÍSKU TUNGUMÁLI, ÞÁ ÞÝÐIR ORÐIÐ  APPOLLO

SKEMMDARVARGUR.

Grandpa being injected with potentiallylethal flu shot.

Afi bólusettur með banvænni flensusprautu. 

It may also be prudent to heed the adviceof former National Institute of Health director James Shannon who stated, "The only safe vaccine is the one that is never used." 

"EINA  ÖRUGGA  BÓLUEFNIРSEM ER ÖRUGGT, ER ÞAÐ SEM ER ALDREI

NOTAÐ."

This advice certainly resonated with  President George W. Bush.

On October 13 of last year in the middleof the US Presidential debates, Bush emphatically declared, "I haven't got  a flu shot and don't intend to."  ( Innskot Agný..Það er allavega ekki sagt að karlinn sé góð meðmæli með ágæti bólusetninga sem að lyfjaframleiðendur fullyrða að séu bæði "hættulaus og örugg.".)

"Ég  hef ekki farið  í flensu sprautu og ég ætla mér  það ekki." .  (Bush and co own the pharmaceutical corporations that supply the vaccinations and drugs that poison and kill us).

SALINE SPRAY DETERRENT:

SALVATNS  SPREY  FYRIRBYGGJANDI:
One month later Reuters carried a  related and interesting item published in the Proceedings of the National  Academy of Sciences.

Harvard  researcher Gerhard Scheuch stated that nasal inhalation of a simple salinespray can stop the flu virus and tuberculosis dead in their tracks.  For reasons perhaps best known to Merck and  others, this potentially life-saving information  did not receive wide  distribution in the popular press.

Rannsókanraðili  hjá Harvard  Gerard Scheuch hélt því fram að

innöndun frá venjulegu saltvatnsspreyi gæti drepið niður flensu

virusinn og berkla á byrjunarstigi. Af  einhverjum orsökum,

sennilega best  þekkt hjá Merck og öðrum (bóluefna  og lyfja

framleiðendum),þá náðu þessar mögulegu  lífsbjargar upplýsingar

ekki mikilli umfjöllun hjá vinsælum dagblöðum.

(InnskotAgný. Hver skyldi vera sponserinn/fjárstyrktar aðilinn á bak við stærstu dagblöðin? )

 

Author Mark Owen is a freelance writer living in Toronto,Canada.

He can be reached at [e-mail]    
Article first published 2/7/05

FYI: Anti Vaccination Story
The author of this website skipped childhood vaccinations and chose not to vaccinate her son - both of them are 100% healthy and NEVER get sick, not even  a cold! And yes, her son's high school tried to refuse enrollment due to no  vaccinations but finally admitted there was a waiver form.

GARDASIL  VACCINE: Gardasil is DANGEROUS. 

Gardasil causes BAD reactions and has  caused several DEATHS! 

GARDASIL HEFUR  VALDIÐ SLÆMUM VIÐBRÖGÐUM  OG

OLLIÐ FJÖLDA DAUÐSFALLA!

The US and UK  governments have given millions of dollars of taxpayers money to Merck, the Big Pharma firm, to buy this untested vaccine that has a history of deaths  and bad reactions from those who have received the poisoned cocktail.

The targeted  market for Gardasil is young women and teens.

MARKHÓPURINN  FYRIR GARDASIL ERU  UNGAR KONUR OG

UNGLINGAR.

( INNSKOT AGNÝ. Tilraunarottur fyrir GARDASIL  urðu  ófrjóar! Er kanski verið að gera næstu kynslóð kvenna ófrjóar ? Sama sem POPULATION CONTROL? Fólksfjölgunar  stjórnun...Reyndar eru konur sem eru bólusettar ófrískar með GARDASIL AÐ MISSA FÓSTUR..OG  ÞAÐ Á SÉR LÍKA STAÐ ÞEGAR ER BÓLUSETT VIÐ ("MEÐ") FLENSU... HINNI  ÁRLEGU, JAFNT SEM SWINE FLU.. POPULATION CONTROL..OVER AND OVER..svo eru flest bóluefni í dag sem innihalda bæði sæðisdrepandi og ófrjósemisefni..Hvað eru þá bólusetningar annað en dulbúnar ófrjósemis  aðgerðir!?)  

The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) said one young women who received Gardasil  died in Germany while the other was in Austria. It has not released their ages.This follows the deaths of three young women aged 12, 19 and 22 who were  reported to have died in the U.S. days after Gardasil was administered, with  1,700 patients suffering "adverse reactions".

Parkinson's Disease is also linked to  pesticides.

A team from Harvard School of Public  Health found that people who said in 1992 that they had been in contact with  pesticides were 70 per cent more likely to develop Parkinson's withinthe next 10 years. - Times UK 6/26/06

(Innskot Agný.  Ég mæli með að allir horfi á  myndina TOXIC SKIES   en hún er akkúrat um  chemtrails og kemísk efni sem dreift er úr flugvélum. Fólk verður fárveikt og  deyr vegna mikillar uppsöfnunar af kemískum efnum sem taldin eru upp hér..En  þessi efni geta rústað ónæmiskerfinu gjörsamlega..)

Chemtrails contain high levels of Barium  and Lead 

CHEMTRAILS INNIHALDA MIKIÐ MAGNA AF  BARIUM OG BLÝI

as well as trace amounts of other  chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver.

Small amounts of water-soluble barium can  cause a person to experience

Lítið magn af vatnsuppleysanlegu barium getur látið manneskju 

upplifa: 

breathing difficulties,  -ÖNDUNAR ERFIÐLEIKA

 increased blood pressures, - HÆKKAÐAN  BLÓÐÞRÝSTING

heart rhythm changes, - BREYTINGAR Á HJARTSLÆTTI 

stomach irritation - MELTINGAR TRUFLANIR 

muscle weakness, - VÖÐVA SLAPPLEIKI

changes in nerve reflexes,-BREYTING Á TAUGAVIÐBRÖGÐUM

swelling of the brain and liver,-  BÓLGA Í HEILA  OG LIFUR

kidney and heart damage. - SKEMMDIR Á NYRUM OG HJARTA.

Toxic barium levels may be an origin of Multiple Sclerosis. -

EITRAÐ MAGN BARIUM GETUR VERIР ORSAKA VALDUR  MS=  HEILA

 OG MÆNU SIGGS. 

 youtube videos.

Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated 2
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated-Page-2

Vaccine Injury Photos  From The CDC
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccine-Injury-Photos-From-The-CDC

ER  ÞETTA SVÍNA FLENSU AFBRIGÐISÝKLAVOPN? 

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/7/ 

SWINE  FLU  HEFUR  MÖGULEGA  ORÐIР TIL  VEGNA  MANNLEGRA MISTAKA  VIÐBÓLUEFNA FRAMLEIÐSLU.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/5/

HEFUR BAXTER  LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/978492/

BÓLUSETTUR  MEÐ VALDI  OGLÖGBOÐIÐ  RFID  FYLGT EFTIR  MEÐ  HERVALDI.VIDEOS

Forced vaccinations: a whistleblower'sclear warning - repostedby Project Camelot
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/952875/

ÖREINDAR  ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL  ÞESS AÐ MERKJA 

OG HAFA EFTIRLIT ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS ?

 Are PopulationsBeing Primed ForNano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/974102/

URGENT WARNING H5N1 DNA in Flu Vaccine. VIDEO Fínt að hafa fuglaflensu veirunameð
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/827643/

Warning...Hybrid Bird Flu  About To Be Released? FEMA

líkkisturnar tilbúnar...
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/4/

The bird/swine flu is man made.

FUGLA/ SVÍNA FLENSAN ER BÚIN TIL AF  MÖNNUM!!

ER  MEXIKANSKA  SVÍNAFLENSAN SÝKLAVOPN?

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/869772/ 

GOÐSÖGNUM  UM  BÓLUSETNINGAR  EYTT.

 http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/946376

ÞINGMAÐUR VIÐURKENNIR TILVIST CHEMTRAIL´S.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/928827

 

DAILY DETOXIFICATION IS MORE CRITICAL  THAN EVER!

The toxins from chemtrails affects every single one of us. 

Deadly vaccine cocktails and drugs need to be expelled from the body.

 The Sun Ancon Chi Machine 

Specific motion energy detoxes the bodyvia the Lymphatic system. 

The Far Infrared Hot  house Dome
Far Infrared detoxes the cells of heavy metals and poisons.

The Electro Reflex Energizer
 Electrotherapy can kill intestinalworms and parasites.

The  E-Power
Electrotherapy causes cellular detox, cleansing, anti-aging and pH balance.

BetaLoe
Boost your immune system - no flu vaccine required ever again.

CHEMTRAILS YFIRLÝSING FRAMKVÆMDASTJÓRA FLUGFÉLAGS UM ÚÐUN KEMÍSKRA EFNA ÚT Í ANDRÚMSLOFTIÐ. Video og myndir. /AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf

 This photos is taken from my house.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf

 http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/project_cloverleaf.htm

 Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author May 22 2000

http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm

http://www.nowpublic.com/strange/project-clover-leaf-secret-chemtrail-program-revealed 

Hr. Carnicom.

Ég las emalið sem þú fékkst frá vélvirkja sem vildi ekki láta nafns síns getið, og mér finnst það vera skylda mín að svara því. Ég vinn einnig hjá flugfélagi, þó að ég sé á hærra stjórnunar stigi.

This photo is also from my house in Iceland

Ég mun ekki segja hjá hvaða flugfélagi ég vinn, í hvaða borg ég er staðsettur, né heldur fyrir hvaða stofnun ég vinn fyrir, en það eru augljósar ásæður fyrir því.

Ég vildi að ég gæti skráð það sem ég er að fara að segja þér frá, en það er næstu ómögulegt og myndi að öllum líkindum hafa í för með sé  líkamsmeiðingar / árás fyrir mig.

Þetta bréf frá nafnlausa vélvirkjanum hljómar satt.(ég bætti þessarri slóð inn hér 30. April 2024. https://educate-yourself.org/cn/chemspewermechanics17apr05.shtml )

Flugfélög í Bandaríkjunum hafa verið að taka þátt í einhverju sem kallast Project Cloverleaf (Smáralaufar verkefnið) í nokkur ár núna.

http://www.nowpublic.com/strange/project-clover-leaf-secret-chemtrail-program-revealed

Elstu dagsetningar sem ég man eftir eru síðan á  árinu 1998.

 Ég var kynntur fyrir því árið 1999.  Þeir fáu starfsmenn flugfélagsins sem voru kynntir fyrir Project Cloverleaf voru allir látnir sæta rannsóknum á okkar bakgrunni okkar og ferli, og áður en við vorum kynntir fyrir því vorum við látnir undirita samkomulag um bann við uppljóstrun, sem í rauninni fól í sér að ef við segðum einhverjum frá okkar vitneskju, þá ættum við á hættu að vera fangelsaðir.

PROOF chemtrails are NOT contrails 

chemtrail sprayers filmed from inside several different jets spraying chemicals. 

Það er íslenskt lag sungið hér og þetta er sett inn af

islandonlinenews þó ég haldi það sé ekki íslendingur ...

 Þetta er gróss sem gaurinn segir hér..!!Flugmaðurinn veit ekki að þetta er tekið upp að ég held..en það sem hann segir er bara staðfesting á því sem er að ske í veðurfarinu um heim allan í dag!!!

Secretly Recorded Chemtrails Pilot Speaks PROOF!

 

Secretly Recorded CHEMTRAILS Pilot Speaks Video1

28. maí 2012

 

SICK SINCE (CHEMTRAILS)..

http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrails

http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail

http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/haarp 

There I did manage to get the spraying plane also. 

But wow...that day I would guess was 20 .. 

And they claim Iceland have clean air! Yeh you right! 

Um 20 starfsmenn ásamt mér hjá okkar stofnun var kynnt málið, af tveimur yfirmönnum frá einhverri sérstakri stofnun stjórnvalda. Þeir sögðu ekki frá því hver hún væri.

 Þeir sögðu okkur það, að stjórnvöld myndu borga flugfélaginu okkar, ásamt fleiri flugfélögum, fyrir það að losa sérstök kemísk efni úr almennings flugvélum.

Þegar við spurðum hvaða kemísku efni þetta væri  og hversvegna við ættum að úða þeim, þá sögðu þeir okkur að þær upplýsingar væru einungis gefnar í algerri neyð og við hefðum ekki leyfi til þess að sjá þær..

Another taken from front of my house to south. 

The mountain is Hafnarfjall. This is their route ..

Síðan héldu þeir áfram að fyllyrða að þessi kemísku efni væru skaðlaus, en að verkefnið var það mikilvægt , að það yrði að framkvæma, hvað sem það kostaði.

Þegar við spurðum þá að því, hversvegna þeir útbyggju ekki bara herflugvélar til þess að úða þessum kemísku efnum, þá fullyrtu þeir að það væru ekki nógu margar herflugvélar á lausu til að losa kemísk efni á svona breiðum grundvelli eins og þyrfti að gera í þessu tilfelli.

Það væri þess vegna sem að Prjoject Cloverleaf væri hrint af stað, til þess að gera almennings flugfelögum kleyft að aðstoða (púff..skelfilegt..) við losun þessarra kemísku efna út í andrúmsloftið.

 Þá spurði einhver hversvegna væri þörf á allri þessarri launung.

Fulltrúi stjórnvalda fullyrti það, ef að almenningur vissi að flugvélin sem þeir væru að fljúga með, væri að losa kemísk efni (eitur) út í loftið, þá myndu umhverfissinnar verða brjálaðir, og fara fram á að úðuninni væri hætt.

Einhver spurði einn af fulltrúunum, ef að þessi efni eru skaðlaus, hversvegna þá ekki segja almenning hvaða kemísku efni þetta væru og hversvegna við værum að úða þeim?

Hann virtist komast i uppnám við þessa spurningu og sagði okkur í yfirvalds skipunar tóni, að almenningur þyrfti ekki að vita hvað væri í gangi, en að verkefnið væri gert í þeirra þágu (almennings..)

 Hann bætti við að við ættum ekki að segja neinum frá, eða spyrja fleiri spurninga um verkefnið. Með þessum orðum lauk kynningunni..

Öll skjöl á skrifstofu okkar sem varða Project Cloverleaf er geymt í læstum skjalaskáp. Engin hefur leyfi til að taka þessi skjöl út af skrifstofunni.

Mjög fáum starfsmönnum er heimilaður aðgangur að þessum skjölum, og varir þeirra eru innsiglaðar í sambandi við það sem stendur í skjölunum.

 Hr. Carnicom, ég er ekkert fífl. .

Ég veit að það er eitthvað í gangi.

Og í hreinskilni sagt, þá er ég hræddur. Ég finn til mkillar sektarkenndar yfir því hafa vitað um svona aðgerð, en vera ófær um að segja nokkrum frá. Það étur mig upp að innan, vitandi það að fyrirtækið sem ég vinn fyrir geti verið að eitra fyrir Bandaríska þegna.

Ég vona að þetta bréf muni opna augu einhverra yfir því hvað sé í gangi. Ég vildi óska þessa að ég gæti látið þig hafa upplýsingarnar á skýrslutæku formi, en þú verður að skilja hversvegna ég verða að vera algjörlega nafnlaus. Með kærri þökk.

Þýðandi Agný.

Ljósmyndirnar eru teknar frá húsinu mínu nema ein..

P.S. Project Cloverleaf er chemtrail úðun...

Hér eru video sem ég hef safnað um chemtrails og HAARP 

og áætlun elítunnar um fólksfækkun í heiminum og hver tilgangurinn er með þessu öllu ógeði..

En það er sko að fækka afætum jarðarinnar niður í álíka marga og búa á Islandi...Allt í þágu elítunnar til að búa til þeirra own Paradis á jörðu...og en ef þið afrekið að horfa á flest þessarra videoa þá er þetta nokkuð augljóst því miður..  voru það ekki 141.000 manns "who will be saved on the doomsday"? nema það að þessi elíta ætlar sér að stjórna því ...en ekki láta það í hendurnar á einhverjum Guð ....þeir leika það hlutverk hér..

 http://vodpod.com/ingaorama

 http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail

http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrails 

http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/haarp 

 http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/%2527population+control-+none+dare+call+it+genocide%2527

 http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail+and+haarp

Playing God with the atmosphere - the 'Shield Project' or 'Operation Cloverleaf' 

http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/playing_god.html

Barack Obama - Zionist Wolf In Sheep's Clothing

http://www.nogw.com/aluminum.html

Chemtrails - Shocking Phoenix Air Quality Test Results 

http://www.rense.com/general82/chemit.htm

KARLMENN! FORÐIST PSA BLÖÐRUHÁLSKIRTILS KRABBAMEINS SKIMUN

 

Men: Avoid Prostate-Cancer PSA Screening

 

by John McDougall, MD
byJon McDougall, MD
Recently by John McDougall, MD: 

The Starch Solution

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/mcdougall2.1.1.html

 SJÚKDÓMSVÆÐING...

“...er sala sjúkdóma,  það sem að breikkar landamæri sjúkdóma og stækkar markaðinn fyrir þá sem selja og dreifa  meðferðar úrræðum.

Það eru skýr dæmi um að flestar sjúkdóms – vakningar  herferðir sem styrktar eru beint af lyfjaiðnaðinum- eru meira ætlaðar til þessselja lyf, en ekki að upplýsa og fræða, sem miðar að því að koma í veg fyrirsjúkdóma eða viðhalda heilbrigði.

Sjúkdómsvæðing gerir heilbrigt fólk að sjúklingum,  sóar dýrmætum auðlindum, og „læknining“  orsakar  skaða. ”

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191 

Ray Moynihan
Science writer for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Medical Journal

LarryKing Live,

 http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/aug/king.htm

 

 Á föstudeginum 21 Ágúst 2009,  þá  breytti sjónvarpsþátturinn  þúsundum annars heilbrigðra  karlmanna í sjúklinga, og olli þeim óbætanlegum skaða, þegar gestir  sjónvarpsþáttarins John McEnroe, Michael  Milken, og Christopher Rose mæltu með því að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu aðfara í PSA rannsókn, í þeim tilgangi að finna blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.

( Þennan þátt er líka hægt að finna frían á iTunes sem podcast og sem transcript.)  https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lkl/date/2009-08-21/segment/01

Ég (John McDougall, MD ) þekki Larry King persónulega.

Ég var gestur á hans alþjóðlega útvarpsþætti 3 sinnum í fjarlægri fortíð. Hann er heiðarlegur maður, en ég tel að hann hafi verið gerður að ginningarfífli fyrir blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins bisnessinn, á kostnað heilsu  karlmanna á þessu tiltekna kvöldi.

Þátturinn snart við tilfinningalegum þræði áhorfenda, með lifandi og  hljóðrituðum vitnisburði  frá  frægum mönnum,  sem höfðu sögu af  blöðruhálskirtils krabbameini sem hafði verið uppgötvað með PSA prófun.

Fyrrverandi ráðherra, hershöfðinginn Colin Powell, framkvæmdarstjóri LosAngeles  Dodger Joe Torre,  útvarpsþáttar stjórnandinn  Don Imus, leikarinn Charlton Heston, leikarinn Jerry Lewis, golfleikarinn Arnold Palmer, borgarstjóri New York Rudy Giuliani, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn John Kerry, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn  Bob Dole, og hershöfðinginn Norman Schwarzkoff, sögðu allir sögu sína af  viðureign sinni við blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein og  augljósan ávinning sem þeir töldu að þeir  hefðu fengið vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir  fylgdi.

Fræg sjónvarpsstjarna Merv Griffin kom einnig fram í video klippu, en sem dæmi „ heimska sjúklingsins“ sem  hunsaði ráðleggingar læknisins og galt fyrir með lífi sínu. ( Af þessum langa lista gætir þú ályktað sem svo að  allir eldri menn hefðu blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.)

Áhorfendum var sagt það að með nútíma tækni þá séu hinir kvíðvænlegu fylgikvillar vegna lausheldni og getuleysis núna sjaldgæfir.

Gestirnir mættu engri mótstöðu vegna þeirra samræmdu skilaboða um að allir  karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu að vera rannsakaðir – og það var engum símtölum  svarað á þessari klukkustund sem þátturinn var á.

Það verður að viðurkennast, að gestgjafinn Larry  King gerði tilraun til að vekja máls á ágreiningnum sem er í kringum  notkun tiltekinna   blöðruhálskirtils  mótefnavaka (PSA)  og stafrænnar endaþarms skoðunar (DRE), og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir kemur -  en hans  ögrandi athugasemdir  voru alltaf hunsaðar af gestum hans.

Hugsanlega var Larry King meðvitaður um það að margar af skoðununum sem  komu fram á meðan á þessum klukkutíma langa þætti væru rangar, og andstætt  ráðleggingum fyrir PSA prófun, sem gerð  er af  American  College of Preventive Medicine,  British  Columbia Office of Technology Assessment,  Canadian Cancer Society,  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, og  öðrum sjálfstæðum iðnaðar- samtökum.

 

Who’s Recommending PSA Testing?

HVERJIR MÆLA MEÐ PSA PRÓFUN?
 

Organizations Against (or Not Supporting) PSA Testing: 

SAMTÖK GEGN ( EÐA STYÐJA EKKI) PSA PRÓFUN.

American College of Preventive Medicine
American College of Physicians 
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 
National Cancer Institute (U.S.) 
British Columbia Office of Technology Assessment
United Kingdom National Health Services 
Canadian Cancer Society 
Canadian Urological Association
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care 
World Health Organization 
European Union Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention 
European Association of Urology 
Cancer Council of Australia
Swedish Council for Technology Assessment in Health Care
National Health Committee, New Zealand
 

Organizations Supporting PSA Testing:

SAMTÖK SEM STYÐJA PSA PRÓFUN.

American Urological Association 
The American College of Radiology
American Medical Association
The American Cancer Society
Urological Society of Australasia

This list is incomplete; however, note that special interest groups representing the prostate cancer industries support PSA testing.

 

 

FYLGIР PENINGASLÓÐINNI.

Það er kanski engin tilviljun að helsti stuðningur fyrir snemm búinni greiningu blöðruhálskirtils karabbameins  með PSA prófun, kemur frá læknisfræðilegum verslunarsamtökum.

Besta dæmið er American Urological Association,

http://www.auanet.org/content/homepage/homepage.cfm

sem kemur fram fyrir hönd meira 16,500 meðlima  sérstakra hagsmunar samtaka  (aðallega  fólks innan þvagfærafræðinnar/urology  ogoncology)  og styrkt af ( lyfja) iðnaðarfyrirtækjum, eins og Glaxo Smith Kline,  Eli Lilly,  Novartis,  Pfizer, og mörgum öðrum  fyrirtækjum sem fá innkomu frá karlmönnum með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.

Allir þrír gestirnir í þessum Larry King Live þætti, reyndust hafa fjárhagsleg tengsl við blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins  iðnaðarins.

John McEnroe er opinber talsmaður fyrir lyfjafyrirtæki, Michael Milken  vinnur með læknis lyfjaiðnaðinum í gegnum Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinsstofnunina  (Prostate Cancer Foundation), og  Dr.Christopher Rose er oncologist geislafræðingur  og starfar sem forstjóri lækna hjá Krabbameins miðstöðinni fyrir  geislameðferðir í Beverly Hills. (The Center for  Radiation Therapy of Beverly Hills.)

Óneitanlega mun vítæk PSA prófun þýða meiri gróða fyrir lækna, sjúkrahús,  rannsóknarstofur, og tækjabúnaðar – og lyfjaframleiðslu fyrirtækin.

Að vissum tíma liðnum þá virðist sem þessi tiltekni Larry King Live  þáttur 21. Ágúst 2009, geti hafa verið  kynningarhluti ætlað til að selja lyfið Avodart fyrir lyfjarisann Glaxo SmithKline (GSK).

Þann 16 Mars 2009 var það tilkynnt  (announced)

http://www.morethanmedicine.us.gsk.com/blog/2009/03/prostate-health-is-a-serious-issue.html

 að  MacEnro hefði gengið til liðs við GSK til þess að biðja karlmenn um að fara til læknis í  þeim tilgangi að vita hvert þeirra PSA stig væri.

Þann 27 April 2009 voru niðurstöður  (results)

http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10047.htm  úr prófunum hjá  REductionby DUtasteride of prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) tilkynntar á fundi hjá  Samtökum Amerískra Þvagfærafræðinga, (American Urological  Association) í Chicago, Illinois.

Í þessarri rannsókn sýndi dutasteride, sem er  hamlari fyrir blöðrukirtils-örvandi androgen5- alpha-dihhydrotestosterone, að fækka fjölda manna með blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinum 5% sem fannst með vefjasýnistöku. GSK selur dutasteride sem Avodart.

Með þessar niðurstöður frá REDUCE ferlinum, þá kemur áskorunin við að  markaðsetja vöruna, sem sé að finna viðskiftavini / kúnna;

í þessu tilfelli, karlmenn með ívið hækkað PSA stig.

Þetta var akkurat það sem Larry King Live þátturinn afrekaði!

John McEnroe vann sitt verk vel.

Með um það bil 1,300.000 áhorfndur daglega, þá bætti þessi þáttur tvímælalaust  við þá 218,900 karlmenn sem greindir eru árlega með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein í Bandaríkjunum.

Uppgötvun á hækkuðu PSA gæti gagnast karlmönnum, að undan skyldum þeim sem  fara í núverandi meðferðir eins og skurðaraðgerðir, geislameðferð, og lyfjameðferð ( sviptingu androgens) hafa ekki sýnt sig í að bjarga lífum ( um

það bil 27,050 karlmenn létust árið 2007 af þessum sjúkdóm).

HVERSVEGNA  PSA  PRÓFUN  OG  MEÐDFERÐIN SEM  FYLGIR  Á EFTIR   MISTEKST.

Á yfirborðinu lítur það þannig út að vegna  snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar  krabbameins í blöðruhálskirtlinum, muni uppgötvunin  lengja lífdaga karlmannanna.

Hvað sem því líður, þá sýna rannsóknar  niðurstöður  annað.

Fyrsta skýrslan frá Blöðruhálskirtils, Lungna, og Eggjastokka (PLCO)  Krabbameins skimunar ferill,  á áhrif  skimunar með sérstakt blöðruhálskirtils antigen (PSA) prófun og stafræna  endaþarms rannsókn (DRE) á dánartíðni af völdum blöðruhálskirtils  krabbameins  var birt í New England Journal of Medicine, March 26, 2009 – PSA  og DRE bjargaði engum lífum.

Önnur  þáttaskila skýrsla, birt í þessu sama hefti, var frá Evrópu og hún sýndi afdráttarlaust fækkun um minna en 1% en 1 dauðsfall hverjum 1000 karlmönnum sem tóku PSA prófið.

Það eru tvær ástæður fyrir því að PSA prófun mistekst að bjarga lífi: Fyrst, óhemju fá  biopsy-prófana sannaði að  krabbamein séu ógnun við líf þitt, og í öðru lagi sé  snemmbúin uppgötvun goðsögn.

Um allan heim eru blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins tilfellin sem uppgötvast í  smásjárskoðun á blöðruhálskirtlinum hjá 30% af karlmönnum eldri en  50ára.

 Í USA er hlutfall smjásjár  blöðruhálskirtils  krabbameins  jafnvel hærri í öllum aldurshópum:

8% manna á þrítugsaldri , 30% hjá mönnum á fertugsaldri, 50% hjá mönnum á sextugsaldri og  80% hjá mönnum á áttræðisaldri.

Hvað sem því líður, hjá flestum karlmanna þá munu þessar frumur sem líta út sem krabbamein  bersýnilega  aldrei dreifast, og  þessvegna  aldrei ógna  lífi  karlmnnanna.

Það var augljóst að  Larry King vissi  þetta, þegar hann  spurði gesti sína  tvisvar þessarrar spurningu.

„ Er  það   goðsögn að þú deyir með honum , en ekki af honum?“

Svarið er þetta:  „ mikið fleiri karlmenn  deyja með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein en af völdum þess.“

Jafnvel þó að blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein komi fyrir hjá flestum  karlmönnum, þá er verulega lítil hætta á að hann drepi sjúklinginn; dánartíðnin  er 226 per 100,000 hjá körlum yfir 65 ára aldur.  

Það hættulausa  en  mjög algenga krabbamein er vísað til sem  dulins krabbameins.  Krabbameinið sem  drepur,  er vísað til sem þróaðs krabbameins.

 Því miður, þá geta læknar ekki sagt  til um það, með því að skoða blöðruhálskirtilsvef í smásjá hvort að  krabbameinið muni einhverntíma verða ógnun við líf viðkomandi.

Niðurstaðan, nærri allir karlmenn  sem önnur þessarra tveggja tegunda krabbameins finnst hjá,  munu fá einhverja af þessum hörkulegu  meðferðum: skurðaraðgerð, geislun, geldingu, og/eða kemíska lyfjameðferð.

Sorglega staðreyndin er sú,  að þeir karlmenn sem hafa árásargjarna, þróaða  formið af þessum sjúkdóm,  munu heldur ekki hljóta ávinning af þessari meðferð, vegna þess að í þessum tilfellum er  uppgötvunin með PSA og DRE  alltof sein,  til þess að þær meðferðir sem eru í dag muni koma að gagni.

Eftir 10 ára vöxt, þegar þessi 2 próf  verða jákvæð, þá er meðaltal krabbameins massans inni í blöðruhálskirtlinum  orðið um 1 cm í þvermál, eða sem samsvarar stærð strokleðurs á enda blýants, og  samanstendur af um það bil billjón frumna. ⁵

Eins og þú getur séð,   „snemmbúin uppgötvun“   er goðsögn og rangnefni – þriðjungur  vaxtarins af þessu þróaða formi af þessum sjúkdóm, hafði þegar átt sér stað án vitundar  sjúklingsins og hans læknis.

Í þessum fátíðu tilfellum, þegar þetta er  raunverulega, „ banvænt form blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins.“  eftir 10 ára vöxt, þá hefur það þegar dreift sér um líkama mannsins.

Þegar þú  ákveður að fara í PSA próf þá ertu að spila á þann möguleika að prófið muni  mögulega finna krabbamein, sem muni geta verið meðhöndlað með góðum árangri og  bætt lífsgæði þín og lengt þitt líf..

Hugsaðu smástund..

Þú ert að veðja á mjög lítinn möguleika af raunverulega fræðilegum ávinningi  sem geti mögulega  átt sér stað í fjarlægri framtíð.

Ef að PSA prófið er jákvætt (það eru 10%líkur á því) og að vefjasýnataka muni leiða í ljós krabbamein  (það eru meira en 30% líkur á því)  þá er  harmleikurinn sem á eftir kemur tafarlaus, raunverulegur, lífs breytandi, og  fyrir alla menn sem greinast (100%) 

Bara það að greinast  með krabbamein breytir manneskjunni það sem eftir er æfinnar.

Endurnýjun heilsu - og líftryggingar eru ekki lengur fáanlegar.

Finna starf við hæfi er mjög  ótrúlegt.

Einu sinni greindur ( með krabbamein) ertu stimplaður „krabbameins sjúklingur“  það sem  þú átt eftir ólifað..

Daglegar áminningar koma frá fjölskyldu, vinum, í  lækna heimsóknum, og sögur í fjölmiðlum um krabbamein..

Áhyggjur og kvíði  stjórna lífi sjúklingsins og fjölskyldu hans.

Framtíð hans verður að  spurningarmerki..  

Allir verkir í líkamanum eru túlkaðir sem endurkoma  krabbameinsins .

Krabbameins  fórnarlambið einangrast frá restinni af heiminnum.¹⁵

Þá eru það  aukaverkanirnar frá meðferðunum.

Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins rannsóknir skýra frá að þvagleki  (lausheldni) var algengari hjá  radical prostatectomy (35%) heldur en með geisla meðferð(12%) eða sviftingu androgen(11%)

Ris vandamál komu iðulega í kjölfar allra meðferðanna (radical prostatectomy, 58%; radiation therapy, 43%;androgen deprivation, 86%).¹⁶  

Lausheldni þýddi  blautar buxur,  bleijur, og stundum þvaglegg ( catheter) í  blöðru mannsins það sem eftir var æfinnar. Niðurstaða Blöðruhálskirtils  Krabbameins rannsóknarinnar er íhaldssöm.

Það er líklegt að meira en  80 % af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins sjúklingunum þrói með sér ris vandamál,  erectile dysfunction 

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/treating/radiation-therapy.html

hvort sem þeir hafa  farið í skurðaraðgerð, eða yfirborðs geisla meðferð.

Og þetta eru einungis 2 af  mörgum aukaverkununum sem koma frá bestu lyfjunum sem hægt er að bjóða karlmanni  með jákvæða PSA prófun.

ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ 

 

HEIMILDIR:

1)Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, MinasianLM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr.?? Prevalenceof prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May27;350(22):2239-46.

2)Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. Anexamination of the evidence. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov23;333(21):1401-5.

3)McNaughton C. Early detection of prostate cancer. Serendipity strikes again. JAMA. 1997Nov 12;278(18):1516-9.

4)Brawn PN.  Prostate-specific antigen levels from completely sectioned,clinically benign, whole prostates.Cancer. 1991 Oct 1;68(7):1592-9.

5)Friberg S, Mattson S. On the growth rates of human malignant tumors:implications for medical decision making. JSurg Oncol. 1997 Aug;65(4):284-97.

6) NealDE, Donovan JL. Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen? LancetOncol. 2000 Sep;1(1):17-24.

7)Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematicreview: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localizedprostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008Mar 18;148(6):435-48

8)Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN,Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O&#39;Brien B, Clapp JD,Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF,Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Mortality results from arandomized prostate-cancer screening trial. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9.

9)Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, KwiatkowskiM, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Määttänen L,Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, MossSM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancermortality in a randomized European study. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8.

10)Franks LM.  Proceedings: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology ofprostatic cancer. Cancer. 1973 Nov;32(5):1092-5.

11) Holund B.  Latent prostatic cancer in a consecutive autopsy series.  ScandJ Urol Nephrol.1980;14(1):29-35.

12) Sakr WA . The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of theprostate in young male patients.  JUrol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):379-85.

13)Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J.  Theprostate specific antigen (PSA) era in the United States is over for prostatecancer:  What happened in the last 20 years.  J Urol. 2004Oct;172(4, Part 1 Of 2):1297-1301.

14)Selley S .  Diagnosis, management and screening of early localisedprostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(2):i,1-96.

15)Little M. Chronic illness and the experience of surviving cancer. InternMed J. 2004 Apr;34(4):201-2.

16)Hoffman RM, Hunt WC, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL. Patientsatisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostatecarcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.Cancer. 2003;97:1653-62.

17)Wilson LS, Tesoro R, Elkin EP, Sadetsky N, Broering JM, Latini DM, DuChane J, ModyRR, Carroll PR. Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancertreatments.  Cancer.2007 Feb 1;109(3):518-27

 

BÓLUEFNI GEGN LÖMUNARVEIKI KENNT UM FARALDUR Í NÍGERÍU

Polio Vaccine Blamed for Outbreaks in Nigeria

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/Polio-Vaccine-Blamed-for-Outbreaks-in-Nigeria.aspx

Posted by: Dr. Mercola
December 01 2009 |

 

 

Lömunarveiki er að dreifast í Nígeríu---og heilbrigðisyfirvöld segja að í  sumum tilfellum sé orsökin bóluefnið sem er notað í baráttunni við hinn lamandi  sjúkdóm. Alþjóðlega heilbrigðismála stofnunin (WHO) hefur sent út viðvörun um  að þessi tiltekni  virus gæti breiðst út fyrir Afríku.

Meira en  120 Nígerísk börn hafa lamast á þessu ári – tvisvar sinnum fleiri bæklaðir en árið  2008.

Nígería og  margar aðrar þjóðir nota lömunarveiki bóluefni sem gefið er í gegnum munn,  (oral)  vegna  þess að það er ódýrara,   einfaldara,  og ver allt samfélagið..

(Innskot Agný..Hvað er að verja,  ef að x aðgerð sem á að verja þig veldur því að þú smitar aðra og sjúkdómurinn dreyfist út og jafnvel stökkbreytist..?

Þetta er það rökhyggjulausasta lið sem til er! Eða "þeir" halda  að  okkur hinum almenna borgara verði ekki fótaskortur í vitglórunni,  sem ég vona nú reyndar að  við flest höfum smá af enn...þó svo við séum nú kanski að  fara að verða "mutaded beast " miðað við allt DNA frá dýrum sem er í bóluefnum...)

( AGNY-What are they protecting if x procedure who is made to protect you cause you to shed the diseace and the diseace even mutate? This people has no bone in their argument -so much is for sure! Or "they" think we the public have become so stupid  that we can not even make 2+2 become 4- still I hope we have not all become like a walking dead- though it is very likely we have self become mutated "beast" from all the animal DNA in the  vaccines  - after all -vaccines are brewed on both animal tissue and plant proteins...never wondered why all these allergie comes from? Peanut allergy- milk allergy- antibiotic allergy- this is all in the vaccine brew!)

En það er búið til  úr lifandi lömunarveiki virus, sem hefur þá hættu í för með sér að valda  lömunarveiki. 

Í einstaka tilfellum getur  virusinn í bóluefninu stökkbreyst í banvænni útgáfu sem eru kveikjan að nýjum  faröldrum.

Erfðafræðilegar greiningar hafa sannað það að þannig stökkbreyttur  virus hafi valdið að minnsta kosti sjö aðgreindum faröldrum í Nígeríu.

 Sources: MSNBC August 14, 2009

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases

Lömunarveiki bóluefni kennt um faraldra í Nígeríu.

Stökkbreyting af lifandi virus í munntöku (oral) skömmtum  tengt 124 tilfellum á þessu ári, segja sérfræðingar.

 

ATHUGASEMDIR DR.MERCOLA

Lömunarveiki, smitandi sjúkdómur sem orsakast af virus  í þörmunum, getur valdið lömun, öndunarerfiðleikum og dauðsföllum í sinni  verstu mynd.

Hvað sem því líður, þá er það SJALDNAST upplýst að í flestum  tilfellum er lömunarveiki vægur sjúkdómur, veldur flensu líkum einkennum og  hverfur á 2-10 dögum..

 

Oft á lömunarveiki sér stað og sýnir alls engin

einkenni.

Mayo Clinicstates: segir  jafnvel. „Meiri  hluti  fólks  sem smitast af lömunarveiki  virusnum verða ekki veikir, og verða þess aldrei áskynja að þeir hafi sýkst af  lömunarveiki.“

Annað sem gæti  valdið þér undrun, er að öll lömunarveiki (polio) tilfellin,  sem hafa orðið eftir að lömunarveiki bóluefnið  kom til sögunnar í þróunarlöndunum, voru af völdum bóluefnisins.   the vaccineitself

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx

Mayo Clinic heldur áfram:

Í Bandaríkjunum var síðasta  tilfellið af villtri lömunarveiki- lömunarveiki af náttúrulegum orsökum—árið  1979,  en ekki af völdum bóluefnisins sem inniheldur lifandi virus.“

Nígería  hefur líka þurft að takast á við lömunarveiki faraldra sem hafa orsakast af  sjálfu lömunarveiki bóluefninu!

Þjóðin hefur þurft að takast á við að minnsta kosti sjö einstök tilfelli  lömunarveiki faraldra sem orsökuðust vegna stökkbreysts  lömunarveiki viruss, frá  lömunarveiki bóluefninu  sjálfu, samkvæmt því sem sjúkdómsvarnareftirlit (CDC) Bandaríkjanna skýrir frá.

according to the U.S. Centers for DiseaseControl and Prevention..

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases

HVERNIG VELDUR  LÖMUNARVEIKI  BÓLUEFNIРLÖMUNARVEIKI?

Nígería og margar aðrar fátækari þjóðir nota munntöku (oral) bóluefni sem  inniheldur lifandi lömunarveiki virus.

Lifandi virusinn getur ekki bara valdið  lömunarveiki hjá bólusettum einstaklingum, hann getur stökkbreyst í jafnvel enn hættulegra afbrigði og kveikt nýjafaraldra.

Til dæmis átti sér stað faraldur á Haiti og Dóminiska lýðveldinu (DominicanRepublic) árið 2002  sem rakinn var til  afbrigðis af munntöku lömunarveiki bóluefnis (OPV) sem stökkbreyttist í skætt  afbrigði. a strain of oralpolio vaccine (OPV) that mutated

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/polio-vaccine-blamed-for-outbreaks-in-nigeria.aspx

Öll tilfelli af lömunarveiki sem hafa átt sér stað  í  Bandaríkjunnum eftir  1979 hafa orsakst af bóluefninu sjálfu sem inniheldur lifandi virusa.

Samkvæmt skýrslum frá Neil Z. Miller hjá Alþjóðlegu bólusetningarstofnuninni, þá getur lifandi lömunarveiki virusinn frá bóluefninu, verið til staðar í hálsi þínum í 1-2 vikur og í hægðunum getur  hann verið allt að 2 mán..

 

Þannig..það er ekki einungis bóluefnis þeginn sem verður í hættu,  

heldur getur hann/hún  hugsanlega smitað sjúkdómnum svo lengi sem

virusinn er í hægðunum.

 

Árið 1999 fyrirskipaði Ráðgjafa  nefnd ónæmisaðgerða (ACIP) að Bandaríkin  skiftu út því sem eftir er til af lifandi –virus bóluefninu með ´´dauðu“ óvirku virus bóluefni.

Hvað sem því líður, þá hefur óvirka lömunarveiki virus bóluefnið heldur  ekki verið án  fjölda alvarlegra  aukaverkana.

Tengsl á milli lömunarveiki bóluefnisins og  krabbameins.

Á árunum 1950 -1960, var lömunarveiki bóluefnið sem enn er gefið i  Bandaríkjunum, venjulega 4 sinnum á 16 fyrstu mánuðum barnsins, mjög mengað af  SV40, apa virus, sem hafði komist í bóluefnið á meðan á framleiðslu ferlinu  stóð.  ( Frumur úr nýrum apa, þar sem  SV40 þreifst, var notað til að  þróa  lömunarveiki bóluefni.)

Í tilraunastofu prófunum uppgötvaðist það, að virusinn olli fjölda ólíkra  tegunda krabbameins, þar á meðal krabbameini í heila, og núna er SV40 að koma  fram hjá fjölda fólks, sem eru með  lungnakrabbamein,  heilakrabbamein,  beinkrabba   og sogæðaeitla  krabbamein.

Samkvæmt höfundum bókarinnar The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus,Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed  

http://www.sv40foundation.org/Book-VV.html

Virusinn og bóluefnið: 

Sönn saga af  Krabbameins-valdandi Apa Virus, Menguðu Lömunarveiki Bóluefni, og Miljónir  Berskjaldaðra Bandaríkjamann,  þá neituðu  leiðandi vísindamenn og yfirmenn stjórnvalda því að endurtaka rannsóknina sem  sýndi að SV40 væri í bóluefninu,  og  jafnvel enn í dag eru vel þekktar umboðsskrifstofur  sem vísa   rannsóknar  niðurstöðunum á bug.

 

Virusinn er jafnvel að koma fram hjá börnum sem voru of ung til að hafa fengið mengaða bóluefnið, og sumir sérfræðingar eru núna að gefa það í skyn að mengandi virusinn hafi verið í lömunarveiki bóluefninu allt  til síðla árs 1999.

as late as 1999

 Það vegna slíkrar áhættu sem að Barbara Loe Fisher, stofnandi NationalVaccine Information Center, sagði:

"Með vaxandi sönnunargögnum um  að kross-tegunda flutningur virusa geti átt sér  stað, þá ættu Bandaríkin að hætta að nota dýravefi við bóluefna framleiðslu.“

Þetta er einnig  sama ástæða fyrir  því að Donald Miller, hjartaskurðlæknir og  professor í skurðlækningum við Washington Háskóla, stingur upp á hér

User-Friendly Vaccination Schedule,  það..að ef þú velur að láta bólusetja  barnið þitt gegn lömunarveiki, að þú biðjir um óvirkt /dautt virus bóluefni, sem ræktað er í manns frumum, ekki í nýrnafrumum úr öpum.

Hvernig þú minnkar  áhættuna á lömunarveiki með því að forðast  sykur.

Lömunarveiki er ekki algeng í Bandaríkjunum, en er vandamál í mörgum   löndum.

Jæja...vissir þú að þú getur minnkað hættuna á að fá þennan sjúkdóm bara  með því að minnka sykurneyslu þína? 

Það er til fjöldinn allur af rannsóknum sem sýna fram á það,  við það að neyta unnins sykurs þá eykur þú hættunaá að fá lömunarveiki... refined sugar increases your risk of contracting polio.

 

Samkvæmt einni slíkri  rannsókn er efni sem myndast við hreinsunarferlið á sykrinum, svo sem eins og deoxsykur,  er talið að  það geti verið orsakavaldur að  lömunarveiki.....

Jafnvel  þó að lömunarveiki virusinn sé til staðar á meðal íbúanna, þá er samt ekki  líklegt að þú fáir hana nema þú neytir unnins  sykurs í mjög miklu óhófi.

Ein af stærstu  og áhrifaríkustu  rannsóknar dæmunum sem ég get deilt með ykkur sem styðja þessa óvæntu  niðurstöðu, kemur frá dýra tilraunum sem var gerð fyrir 50 árum síðan..

Rannsóknaraðilarnir  reyndu ítrekað að sýkja kanínur með lömunarveiki, en það bar ekki árangur fyrr en þeir  lækkuðu blóðsykurs magnið  hjá kanínunum  með því að sprauta þær með insulin,   lowered the rabbits&#39; blood sugarlevels with insulin injections,, sem trúlega bæklaði ónæmiskerfi kanínanna og olli því að þær sýktust af lömunarveiki..

Lömunarveiki og aðrir smitsjúkdómar, virðast aðeins valda aukaverkunum   þegar ónæmiskerfi okkar er veiklað, sem getur auðveldlega skeð vegna lélegrar  næringrar, stress og ónógs svefn.

Lömunarveiki bóluefnið er ekki aðal lausnin  til þess að koma í veg fyrir þennan sjúkdóm..

Á móti því að hlaða þig upp af bóluefnum, þá gæti  það að takmarka sykur notkun þína,  verið  áhrifaríkasta aðgerðin sem þú gerir til þess að bæta heilsu þína almennt, þar  sem það hjálpar til þess að halda ónæmiskerfi þínu sterku, sem mun skila sér í  því að minnka hættuna á því að þú fáir fjöldann allan af sjúkdómum, þar á meðal  lömunarveiki..

ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ. 

Læt hér slóðir inn á aðrar þýðingar mínar um samskonar málefni. 

More post´s about same object  on the links there.

ARGENTÍNSK STJÓRNVÖLD RANNSAKA DAUÐSFÖLL BÓLUSETTRA BARNA. 

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/637512 

LÖMUNARVEIKI Í NÍGERÍU RAKIN TIL STÖKKBREYTTS BÓLUEFNIS..

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/356536

LÆKNAR OG VÍSINDAMENN FORDÆMA BÓLUSETNINGAR.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/348959

Bólusetningar orsök og aukaverkanir.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/330190 

 

RelatedLinks:

  SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: NowBeyond Coincidence?

SV40,LÖMUNARVEIKI  BÓLUEFNI OG KRABBAMEIN, LANGT  ÚT FYRIR MÖRK TILVILJANA.

Simian Virus 40 DNA Found In US Children

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/simian-virus-40-dna-found-in-us-children.aspx

Fructose: This Addictive Commonly Used Food Feeds Cancer Cells, Triggers Weight Gain, and Promotes Premature Aging

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx

Polio Linked to Sugar Consumption

LÖMUNARVEIKI  TENGT VIÐ NEYSLU SYKURS.

Vaccine Confirmed as Source of PolioOutbreak

BÓLUEFNI  STAÐFEST SEM ORSAKAVALDUR LÖMUNARVEIKI FARALDS.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/polio-vaccine-blamed-for-outbreaks-in-nigeria.aspx

Why Is The Anti -Defamation League (ADL) Promoting Alex Jones?

WHY IS THE ADL PROMOTING ALEX JONES?

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=465
Commentary By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Real Zionist News, 12-1-09/Copyright 2009

Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner & Link To Real Zionist News (SM) 

For The Best Alternative News CLICK: Rense.com Here

 

THE ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE’S RECENT ‘BLAST’ at radio conspiracy ‘patriot’ maven, Alex Jones, appears to be more - AND less - than it seems upon closer examination and rational consideration.

 

That world Zionism is the center of evil on the planet is beyond any rational dispute. From AIPAC and the ADL to the bogus Southern Poverty Law Center to B’nai B’rith, Zionism is the most ruthless geopolitical (thermonuclear Israel), financial and political force in the United States…and much of the world.

Even a rudimentary understanding of the Wall Street bankster machine, and the beyond corrupt Federal Reserve, reveals the overwhelming power of Zionism which ultimately traces back to the City of London banking center, and the Rothschilds. As David Icke succinctly puts it, “Zionism is the Elephant in the Controllers’ Board Room” that only Zionist deniers, de facto agents and Zionist apologists pretend isn’t there and won’t mention.

The premiere Zionist enforcement agency in America, the ADL, often runs hit pieces on people it tries to smear as ‘anti-semites’ or ‘anti-Israel’ and so forth. These pieces are usually vicious in tone and replete with baseless slanders and smears of the targeted individual/s. (Brother Nathanael is described by the ADL as a ‘rabid anti-Semite.’) However, when was the last time you saw an ADL Zionist hit piece targeting someone who virtually never even mentions Zionism or makes anti-Zionist statements? That question is vital…as you consider the following material.   

A recent investigative piece by Lorie Kramer uncovered an apparent clear link between Zionism and the Zionist Bronfman family of North America, and alternative talk show host Alex Jones. Kramer’s research showed that Holly Bronfman’s attorney just happens to be Jones’ personal attorney. Coincidence? From that discovery it is not hard to project why Mr. Jones avoids even the mention of ‘Zionism’ unless put into a corner. Read Entire Kramer Story Here, Here & Here.

In one of his most infamous Zionist coverup statements, Jones stated: “Hollywood Is Owned By The Arabs’ - The Arabs Own Everything!” That stunning statement simply shattered the credibility meter. It’s simply a matter of connecting the dots.

Many have noticed - and even die-hard fans have been perplexed for years - over Jones refusing to discuss the ‘elephant in the board room’ on his radio show. He simply will not criticize or even mention ‘World Zionism’ except in passing…and very infrequently at that. Facts are facts. Therefore, when the ADL ‘blasts’ someone in the media who does not mention Zionism, or the Israel Lobby, or Zionist Jews, one has to start digging a little deeper and thinking of who ultimately benefits from such an ADL ‘attack.’

Jones, jumping on the opportunity (as planned at some level?) pointed to the ADL ‘hit piece’ story on one of his sites and masterfully presented an ‘editorial rebuttal’ to it, which was about how the ADL had ruthlessly attacked America’s most highly-visible patriot talk show host. In a deft attempt to underscore the ADL piece as a personal attack on Jones - as if he were a true enemy of Zionism - the Jones site’s responsive editorial blasted back at the ADL piece as if it had damaged him severely.

However, once again, the term Zionism never appeared. Connect the dots again. Jones is, in reality, anything but a patriot martyr out to expose the Zionist Jewish agenda and its malignant hold on our Republic. The ADL article actually reads more like a promo for Jones than a personal attack as evidenced by even just two excerpts:

“Jones runs a syndicated radio show, The Alex Jones Show, which is broadcast on AM and FM stations. Jones also operates two popular Web sites, Infowars and Prison Planet, and appears on a cable access television show.” (Remember, this is supposed to be a savage hit piece on Jones…)

“After the election of Obama, Jones developed ties to mainstream media outlets such as the FOX News Network. In March 2009, Jones appeared on the FOX News programFreedom Watch which allowed him to simulcast the show over his radio program.” (Reads like a publicity release…which is really, essentially, exactly what the ADL piece is.) Read The Entire ADL Story Here.

 

 

JONES’ HOME RADIO SHOWS
PRESENTED BY ZIONIST JEWISH MEDIA

 

EVERY SUNDAY AFTERNOON when most Christians are in Church - but when Jews are working - Alex Jones does a syndicated and internet-based show from his home studio for KLBJ 590 AM (“Alex Jones brings his unique perspective to the KLBJ team”) from 4:00-6:00pm. Who, exactly, is the KLBJ team’s owner?

In fact, KLBJ AM is owned by Emmis Communications, (”Emmis” is the Hebrew word for “truth”), which operates radio stations in the nation’s largest markets, including New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago. The Founder and CEO of Emmis Communications just happens to be a well-connected Jewish American broadcast mini-mogul named Jeffrey H. Smulyan — the kind of Jewish American who would doubtless have strong allegiance to Zionist Jewish organizations like the ADL — and whom the ADL likes to support in return.

With a Doctorate Law degree from the University of Southern California School of Law and a subsequent “Tree of Life Award” from the Jewish National Fund, Smulyan has just the right credentials to rub shoulders with one of the JNF’s financial recipients, the ADL.

In 1994, Smulyan was tabbed by The White House to head the U.S. Delegation to the Plenipotentiary Conference of the International Telecommunications Union. As a U.S. ambassador, Smulyan negotiated an agreement between Israel and the PLO which has since hit the trash bin due to Zionist Israel’s ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

In 2005, (boasts Smulyan on his Website), Emmis Communications was named one ofFortune magazine’s “100 Best Companies to Work For.” (Smulyan does not mention thatFortune is owned by the Canadian Jew, Edgar Bronfman Jr. of Time Warner, who has aprofessional alliance with Emmis Communications.)

Apparently, Alex Jones ALSO LIKES to work for Emmis and KNOWS very well, indeed, how to keep his mouth shut when it comes to singling out Zionists and Jewish lobbyists when broadcasting for Smulyan’s KBLJ radio. View Entire Story Here & Here

EVERY SATURDAY EVENING when Jews are feasting on their “Erev Shabbat” Sabbath meal, Jewish-owned satellite radio Sirius Network, beams out Jones’ muddled message on its XM radio station from 6:00 PM to 9:00 PM.

The Sirius XM Radio Network is owned by the American Jew, Mel Karmazin, CEO; andmanaged by the Jews, Scott Greenstein, President; David Frear, Chief Financial Officer; and Eddy Hartenstein, Chairman of the Board. Connect the dots. Zionism is king.

Before his July 2009 stint with Sirius, Jones was railing against Sirius XM radio for featuring‘no planner’ Paula Gloria on Sirius’ Howard Stern slot. Why did Jones suddenly change his mind? Could it be money, lots of Zionist money? - a big motivator even for ‘conspiracy theorists’ like ADL-promoted radio talk show hosts.

 

* A STUNNER FROM THE JERUSALEM POST *
“JONES’ SALARY PAID BY THE JEW MEDIA”

 

 

Jones Called ‘Jewish Media’s Rebbe’ By Jerusalem Post

VETERAN JERUSALEM POST REPORTER, David Shamah, (a vehement Zionist Jew), admits, or to be more accurate, exposed Alex Jones for “being on the Jews’ payroll.” Yes, that is a direct quote from the article.

On Shamah’s Website, Digital Newzgeek, where he archives his Jerusalem Post articles, Shaman posted a piece which he penned for the Jerusalem Post on April 14 2009, titled,What Creeps Under Internet Rocks. In the article, Shaman exposes Jones as a “rebbe” whose fans fear his Jewish ties will make him “look bad:” Wrote Shamah:

“Jones believes that the world is run by the Rockefellers, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group. But I never heard him utter the word ‘Jew’ in connection with any of these conspiracies. According to Jones’ Wikipedia biography page: ‘The Alex Jones Show radio program is broadcast live from Emmis Communications KLBJ Radio in Austin, Texas.’

“The CEO of Emmis? Jeff Smulyan, winner of the Jewish National Fund’s Tree of Life Award. Interestingly, I have never seen Smulyan’s name on the lists of Jews who run the media on the Anti-Semitic sites. Could it be they don’t want to make their ‘rebbe,’ Jones, look bad? After all, his salary is being paid by ‘Jew media!’” Read Entire Shamah Story Here.

So, it’s not hard to see that even Zionist Jews know what Jones and his flappery about ‘the Arabs owning Hollywood’ and virtually never touching the subject of the ‘elephant in the boardroom’ are all about…and on which side his kosher bread is buttered.

 

. 

THE ADL COVERS FOR JONES

 

BACK TO THE FARCE ADL ARTICLE which supposedly ‘blasts’ Jones, but is, in reality, running interference for him…a clever psy op to make it look like the ADL hates him. Nothing could be much farther from reality.

No sooner did the ADL publish what amounts to this thinly-veiled PR piece for him, than Jones’ largely Zionist staff cranked out its painfully contrived story about how poor Jones was being savaged by the ADL.

Nowhere in the ADL article do the words ‘anti-semite’ or ‘anti-semitic’ appear…terms of standard operating bedrock for virtually ALL ADL attacks on those who oppose Zionism and its death grip on America.

So, again, if you haven’t connected the right dots, it is patently obvious that the ADL moved to give Jones and his agenda of not mentioning the ‘elephant in the board room’ a near-perfect shield to protect him. The Jones site editorial reply to theADL ‘hit piece’ is simply the sequel to the binary ADL psy op. Read both and decide for yourself.

Jones runs, according to many, a de facto ZIONIST OPERATION, and he ONLY mentions Zionism in passing when he absolutely must. His historic effort to cover for his Zionist Jewish Hollywood friends by saying, on a “YouTube clip, “The Arabs own Hollywood and everyone knows it” is truly a classic faux pas. The ‘Arabs’? He might as well have tried to deny the existence of the sun.

Jones, his program, his sites (at least five of them), and through his documentaries are essentially the core of a mass desensitizing operation. When viewing his ‘films,’ most come away feeling as if they’ve been bludgeoned and beaten to near hopelessness. And that, of course, is the very idea. All the talk about ‘taking the country back’ basically runs most people into the ground…and many of them become moribund, disheartened…or just quit.

When Jones keeps pounding home the theme about the ALL-powerful Global Elite - but not mentioning that Zionist Jews ARE the great majority of the elite - the message of who is really running the West and America is lost. Zionism would seem to have a truly great, loyal and steadfast friend in Mr. Jones.

 

JONES IS BASICALLY, (as one of the most visible public figures in the alternative media), not much more than a showman or razzle-dazzle carny type. He could have earned millions as a ‘teevee evangelist.’

Does anyone really think that Jones got into Bohemian Grove and did all that videotaping without the Elite knowing about it? That DVD was, of course, the perfect entre into the larger world of alternative media for him as the ultimate ‘patriot super hero.’ And with thepassing of William Cooper (who exposed Jones as a liar), the path was clear for the Jones machine to make its move. View Cooper YouTube Video Here.

Jones’ strange ‘connections’ to the uber Zionist Bronfman family via his personal attorney, and toZionist Hollywood; the fact that he has a ticket to ride on his flagship radio station with Emmis Communications and a slot on XM/Sirius; that his top staff is dominated by Zionist Jewish Americans (also see his protege Jason Bermas’ hateful YouTube Video Here); and that many of hissponsors are Jewish-owned businesses…should be highly instructive to those seeking to understand why he gives Zionism a clean pass by rarely, if ever, mentioning it.

Jones has a specific agenda that unquestionably covers for Zionism. Sure, he wears the cloak of the Patriot…he’s a master at it. Remember …the BEST disinformation is at least 90% truth. And Alex ‘Bullhorn’ Jones appears to be the best friend world Zionism has in the often murky milieu of ‘patriot’ radio and the alternative media. Remember…connect the dots…and the true picture eventually congeals in front of one’s eyes…truly a stark and painful image in this case.

For Further Listening - ‘Alex Jones Master Of Deception’ Here
___________________________________
For More See: Is Alex Jones A Zionist Shill?..Controversy Swirls Click Here

 

And: Is Alex Jones Linked To Zionist-Jew Bronfman? Click Here

And: Entire RZN ‘ADL Hate’ Articles Click Here 

SJOKKERANDI VIÐVÖRUN : FÓSTURLÁT AF VÖLDUM H1N1 SVÍNAFLENSU BÓLUEFNISINS.

-Swine Flu Alert -- Shocking Vaccine Miscarriage Horror Stories

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/28/Shocking-Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Miscarriage-Stories.aspx

 

Heilbrigðis yfirvöld Bandaríkjanna  hafa sett ófrískar konur í hæsta áhættu hópinn til að fá H1N1 svínaflensubóluefnið, en er þetta í reynd öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur og þeirra börn?

Staðreyndin er sú,  að á  innihalds lýsingu  svínaflensu  bóluefnisins segir að það hafi ekki verið  rannsakað með tilliti til þess,  hvort það  sé öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur.

Og fósturláts skýrslur frá ófrískum konum sem  hafa verið bólusettar með H1N1 svínaflensu bóluefninu eru byrjaðar að streyma  inn frá öllum þjóðum..

( Innskot Agný. Þetta er fínt...þeir  eru sko að nota bóluefnið til þess að fækka mannkyninu..það er í raun það sem  allt þetta flensu faralds propaganda áróður snýst um...Sama hvaða nafni  faraldurinn nefnist...Svínaflensa 1976, West Nile virus, SARS,  fuglaflensa..en þeim gekk ekki nógu vel að  gera þetta að heimsfaraldri..en trikkið er að setja x veirur með í t.d árlega  flensubóluefnið..og volia þú verður undarlega veikur rétt eftir  bólusetninguna..sorry geta liðið upp í 2 vikur...nú..eða að þú hrekkur uppaf..ekk  isíst ef þú ert í þessum víðfræga „áhættu“hóp..sem þýðir að þú ert með  langvinnan sjúkdóm, undirliggjandi sjúkdóm,  sem setur þig í þann hóp að þér er  eiginlega skipað/mandatory að fara í sprautuna..

Ja reyndar falla heilbrigðisstarfstéttir líka þarna inn..herinn, lögreglan og slökkviliðsmenn...allavega í USA.. Líkaminn hefur bara miki meira  en nóg djobb við að berjast við sjúkdómana sem fyrir eru,   til að geta búið til  mótefni...þannig að viðkomandi fær sjúkdóminn sem bólusetningin á að vera   gegn..  Utan við öll önnur efni sem eru í bóluefninu...hvað með þá sem eru með  óþol fyrir eggjum?   Öll flensu bóluefni eru ræktuð í kjúklinga fósturvísi... þar  að auki er mesta kvikasilfur/THIMEROSAL  magnið í flensubóluefninu miðað við önnur  bóluefni...  

Thimerosal er líka í  öðrum bóluefnum..þar á meðal er það í TWINRIX  ADULT og TWINRIX PEDIATRIC bóluefninu sem er gegn lifrarbólgu A og B og er  notað hér á landi bæði fyrir fullorðna og börn..Þó svo Thimerosal sé ekki í  PRIORIX sem er MMR = mislingar, rauðir hundar oghettusótt bóluefnið sem notað er hér á  landi...og hefur verið af mörgum tengt við autism/einhverfu..

SET SLÓÐIR HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN ÞAR SEM ÞIÐ GETIÐ KYNNT YKKUR MÁLIÐ SJÁLF EF  ÁHUGI ER FYRIR HENDI.)

 

Slóðin hér fyrir neðan inniheldur  sögur sem munu gera þig reiða/n og sjokkeraðan. Ef þú ert ófrísk móðir, viltu  þá vera svo væn að fara EKKI  í H1N1 svínaflensu bólusetninguna!

Í staðinn, gerðu  allt sem þú mögulega getur til að forðast almennings stað,  og vertu viss um að  þú þvoir þér enn betur og oftar um hendurnar en þú ert vön.

Rannsakaðu og  kynntu þér allar þær náttúrulegu aðferðir sem eru til, til þess að bægja  flensunni frá..

Þýðandi Agný. 

Sources:

  Organic Health November 11,2009 

Is The H1N1 Vaccine Safe? Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had

Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine

 http://organichealthadviser.com/archives/shocking-h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-miscarriage-stores-from-pregnant-women-tell-your-doctors-that-vaccines-and-pregnancy-do-not-mix

  About.com

 

Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog

From Krissi Danielsson, Former About.com Guide since 2007

Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine

 

http://miscarriage.about.com/b/2009/09/29/some-pregnant-women-fearful-of-h1n1-vaccine.htm

 

  LatestH1N1 Swine Flu Alerts 

 

The hype and hysteria over H1N1 Swine Flu has intensified worldwide without enough proper information about it. 

http://swineflu.mercola.com/ 

  Flu WasNot the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic 

Flu Was Not the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/28/Flu-Was-Not-the-Real-Killer-in-the-1918-Pandemic.aspx 

 

Flu may not have killed most in 1918 pandemic

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5146PD20090205?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews&sp=true 

  

  CanadaLooks at Vitamin D for Swine Flu Protection 

 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/27/canada-looks-at-vitamin-d-for-swine-flu-protection.aspx

  ALERT:Special Swine Flu Update 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu-Update.aspx 

SwineFlu -- One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx 

  ObamaDeclares Swine Flu Emergency 

 

Algeng tenging við dauðsföll af völdum  svínaflensu.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/31/CDC-Says-Kids-That-Die-From-Swine-Flu-Have-Coexisting-Bacterial-Infections.aspx

Ný rannsókn sem  gerð  var hjá Sjúkdómsvarnar eftirlitinu(CDC)  uppgötvaði það að þau 36 börn sem  látist höfðu af völdum H1N1 frá April – Agust þá höfðu einstaklingarnir engin  krónísk heilsufars vandmál. En öll áttu þau við bakteríu sýkingar að stríða á  sama tíma.

Sú mest algenga sýking sem var til staðar sem olli  flensu tengdum dauðsföllum, var staphylococcus  aureus. Við berum  það  helst í nefi og/eða húðinni.. Flensan veldur efri loftvega skemmdum, og býr  til greiða leið fyrir staphs inn í  lungun..

Þýðandi Agný. 

Sources:

  Star Tribune October 5, 2009  

 Diseases - In -The - Vaccinated 1

http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated

http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/proof-that-european-h1n1-vaccines-contain-mercury-squalene-and-tween-80/

Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated 2
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated-Page-2

Vaccine Injury Photos  From The CDC
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccine-Injury-Photos-From-The-CDC

ER  ÞETTA SVÍNA FLENSU AFBRIGÐI SÝKLAVOPN? 

IS THIS VERSION OF SWINE FLU  A BIO-WEAPON?

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/7/ 

SWINE  FLU  HEFUR  MÖGULEGA  ORÐIР TIL  VEGNA  MANNLEGRA

 MISTAKA  VIÐ BÓLUEFNA FRAMLEIÐSLU.

SWINE FLU  GET A LIVE BECAUSE OF MISTAKES  IN VACCINE MAKING..

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/5/

HEFUR BAXTER LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE?

HAS BAXTER  INTERNATIONAL RELEASED BIO-WEAPON IN UKRAINE?

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/978492/

BÓLUSETTUR  MEÐ VALDI  OG LÖGBOÐIÐ  RFID FYLGT EFTIR  MEÐ  HERVALDI. VIDEOS

Forced vaccinations: a whistleblower&#39;s clear warning -  Project Camelot
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/952875/

ÖREINDAR  ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS ?

 Are Populations  Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/974102/

URGENT WARNING H5N1 DNAin Flu Vaccine.

VIDEO Fínt að hafa fuglaflensu veiruna með
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/827643/

Warning...Hybrid Bird Flu  About To Be Released?

FEMA líkkisturnar tilbúnar...FEMA COFFINS ARE READY!
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/4/

The bird/swine flu is man made.

FUGLA/ SVÍNA FLENSAN ER BÚIN TIL AF MÖNNUM!!

ER MEXIKANSKA  SVÍNAFLENSAN SÝKLAVOPN?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/869772/

Five die after  seasonal flu vaccination

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2911318

    The New York Times mentions an 8-year-old boy from LongIsland who died roughly a week after receiving a seasonal flu vaccine

Flu Vaccine  Ruins Beautiful Redskins Cheerleader

http://www.nfljuice.com/2009/10/20/flu-vaccine-ruins-beautiful-redskins-cheerleader/

Last year, a 6-year-old girl from Colorado died after getting the FluMist vaccine

U.S. Government Ignores Flu Vaccine Death

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/07/17/u-s-government-ignores-flu-vaccine-death.aspx

A  Review of Four Approved Swine Flu Vaccines’ Ingredients

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/05/Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

 

The National Vaccine InformationCenter (NVIC )  

http://www.nvic.org/  is calling for a comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated  individuals for all health outcomes, and I believe it would be prudent to do so.

 Flu Vaccine may Lead to Asthma in Infants 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/04/14/flu-vaccines-part-one.aspx

  Risks ofFluMist Vaccine 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/10/04/flumist-vaccine.aspx 

  Girl’s FluDeath Happened Within Hours 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/3/18/girl-s-flu-death-happened-within-hours.aspx