Frsluflokkur: Vsindi og fri

Bluefnin eru verri en Dr Mikovits taldi. Ertu undirbinn fyrir Lftkni vopn 2?

Sent ann 19. nvember 2020 af horse237

Why You Should Never Take Their 'Vaccine'

The Vaccines Are Worse That Dr Mikovits Thought
Because Of The Disclosed Use Of A Nano Machine
'Carrier System' That Will Reprogram DNA And May Kill
50 Million Americans

https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2020/11/19/the-vaccines-are-worse-than-dr-mikovits-thought/

Dr. Judy Mikovits sagi a etta krnaveiru bluefni gti drepi 50 milljnir Bandarkjamanna nstu 40 rum.

tgfurnar sem Pfizer og Moderna eru a senda marka urfa geymslu vi mnus 70 grur Celsus (mnus 94 F) og gtu veri miklu banvnni en jafnvel hn tlai upphaflega.

Af hverju arf svona mikinn kulda?

Barnaheilsuvarnir tskru grein 6. gst, „mRNA bluefnin sem fara klnskar rannsknir Covid-19, ar meal Moderna bluefni, reia sig „ burar kerfi byggt nangnum sem innihalda tilbi efni sem kallast pletlen glkl (PEG).“

Notkun PEG (pletlen glkl) lyfjum og bluefnum eru sfellt umdeildari vegna vel skjalfestrar tni skalegra PEG tengdra nmisvibraga, ar me talin lfshttuleg braofnmi.

Rflega sj af hverjum tu Bandarkjamnnum geta n egar veri nmir fyrir PEG, sem getur haft fr me sr minni virkni bluefnisins og auki alvarlegar aukaverkanir.

Ef mRNA-bluefni sem inniheldur PEG fyrir Covid-19 fr FDA samykki, verur aukningin v a vera tsettur fyrir PEG fordmalausar - og mgulega hrmulegar.

Skjl og tgfur fr Moderna benda til ess a fyrirtki geri sr vel grein fyrir ryggishttunni tengslum vi PEG og ara tti mRNA tkninnar ess en hefur meiri hyggjur af niurstunum.

Fitu nanagnir valda ofurblgu vibrgum lkamanum, sem leiir til alvarlegra vibraga, sjkrahsvistar og hugsanlega daua.

Af hverju eru LNP (Lipid Nanoparticles) notu essi bluefni?

Eins og heilsuvernd barna tskrir nnar:

Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) „hylja mRNA bygginguna til a vernda hana gegn niurbroti og stula a frumu upptku“ auk ess a rva nmiskerfi (eiginleiki sem vsindamenn bluefna lsa gjarnan sem „elislgt hjlparefni“).

Me rum orum, LNP eru hjlparefni, sem ir a au eru hnnu til a valda ofnmis vibrgum hj flki, egar a hefur veri sprauta einu sinni .

etta er gert v skyni a f fram mtefni sem gerir bluefna framleiandanum kleift a halda v fram a au sni „ mikla virkni“, jafnvel egar smu hjlparefni valda alvarlegum aukaverkunum.

Samkvmt nlegum bluefna rannsknum sem gerar voru af Moderna upplifu 100% einstaklinga hpnum me strum skmmtum bluefnis alvarlegar aukaverkanir.

Svo af hverju eru Moderna og Pfizer a nota mRNA (bobera-RNA) bluefni?

eir vilja endurforrita DNA manna tilraun og sj hva verur um afkomendur okkar.

Gagnrnendur Bretlandi segja a aukaverkunin s frjsemi sem s g fyrir Powers That Ought Not To Be sem ttu ekki a vera vegna ess a eir vilji losa jrina vi 6 milljara auk almennings.

Uppfra klukkan 04:50. Fr Australian Independent:

essi nju bluefni eru alveg njum flokki t af fyrir sig.

eir eru ekktir sem „RNA boberar"(messenger RNA)(mRNA) bluefni og eir vinna me v a rna vlarnar sem framleia prtein frumunum num ...

egar Moderna var rtt a enda 1. stigs rannskn sna, skrifai The Independent um bluefni og lsti v annig:

„a notar r af erfabreyttu RNA efni framleitt rannsknarstofu sem, egar v er sprauta lkama inn, verur a a rast frumurnar nar og rna af r frumuprtna framleislu vlbnainum rbsm til a framleia veirutti sem san jlfa nmiskerfi itt til a berjast gegn vrusnum. “

„ essu tilfelli er mRNA-1273 fr Moderna forrita til a lta frumur nar framleia hi frga krnaveiru gadda protein sem gefur vrusnum krnu-tlit (corona er krna latnu) sem hann er nefndur eftir,“ skrifai The Independent.

Lokauppfrsla:

Astra Zeneca bluefni arf ekki mnus 70 grur Celss geymslu-og flutningsastu vegna ess a a notar ekki mRNA til a endurforrita mannslkamann.

En eir nota manns fstur sem hjlparefni.

Hjlparefni hjlpar bluefninu a ra auki nmissvar. essu tilfelli eru eir a nota MRC-5 sem er r lungnavef fr 14 vikna hvtum karlkyni. Hjlparefni vekja upp (sparka ) nmiskerfi.

MRC-5 sem er DNA fr eydda barninu, gerir a a verkum a lkami inn sr a sem innrs og kemur til varnar.

Bandarsk brn eru me svo marga bluefna skaa a egar au eru 21, er meira en helmingur eirra me sjkdma og heilkenni sem enginn hafi s essum tlum fyrir sjunda ratuginn ( 1960s) egar Big Pharma byrjai a dla t svo miklu fleiri bluefnum.

N vitum vi hvers vegna srael hefur vali a nota Rssneska bluefni og hafna tilboum Pfizer, Moderna og Astra Zeneca.

Ntma matari, meindraeyir, illgresiseyir, bluefni og lyf Big Pharma hafa skapa faraldur blgusjkdma hj ntma krlum, konum og brnum.

Erum vi tilbin til a mehndla ofurblgu tilfelli fyrir tugi milljna?

Enskukonan myndbandinu hr a nean snir innskoti ar sem Astra Zeneca viurkennir a nota MRC-5 ea lkamshluta fsturs.

Hn segir einnig a bresk stjrnvld su a leita a gerfigreindar kerfi (AI) til a hjlpa eim a safna saman og tlka upplsingarnar egar bluefna skaar og dausfll aukast.

https://www.brighteon.com/embed/e536da0c-7935-41eb-babe-416034e154c3

Bill Gates glotti einu sinni og sagi a flk fylgdist ekki me essum vrus en a myndi taka eftir eim nsta.

Ertu undirbinn fyrir Lftkni vopn 2? (Bioweapon 2?)

g held a a s best a vi sleppum essu bluefni. Ltum alla Gates fjlskyldunni, hj Big Pharma, fyrirtkja fjlmilunum, Wall Street, hsinu og ldungadeildinni, hj CDC og NIH taka etta bluefni fyrst.

g viurkenni a g elska dr svo g held a a s best a vi sleppum dra rannsknum egar ng er af fyrirlitlegum mannverum boi.

Auvita myndi g samt neita essum bluefnum vegna ess a g tel ekki a Bill Gates tti a hafa rtt til a endurforrita DNA 7 milljara manna, bara vegna ess a honum finnst a g hugmynd.

Dnartni er mjg lg hj flki sem hvort er ekki deyja r hjartasjkdmi, krabbameini, langvinnri lungnateppu, ofskmmtum af lyfjum, banvnum nrna- og lifrarsjkdmum, blslysum og sjlfsvgum.

Ef vi tkum ll D-3 vtamn, vri dnartnin lgri en af inflensu.

g myndi bta vi Quercetin og sink vi til a fra dnartluna enn near.

etta er greinin ar sem Dr Mikovits sagi a 50 milljnir Bandarkjamanna gtu di r essu bluefni.

En taki eftir a hn minnist ekki nanagnirnar sem gtu mjg auveldlega veri httulegri heilsu manna en venjulegar sameindir sem framleia blgur. Ofurblga gti valdi alvarlegum veikindum og daua.

Dr Mikovits: Bluefni gti drepi tugi milljna Amerku

https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2020/10/13/dr-mikovits-vaccine-could-kill-tens-of-millions-in-america/

g nefndi a Bill Gates var glottandi mean hann gaf skyn a Lftkni vopn 2 vri leiinni.

Bill Gates glotti. Mun flk deyja? https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2020/07/06/bill-gates-smirked-will-people-die /

g gaf skyn a fjlmilafyrirtkin vru lka fyrirlitleg og stjrnmlamenn og Lyfjainaurinn (Big Pharma.)

Matt Lauer grddi 25 milljnir dollara ri vi lestur morgunfrttanna. Hann hafi frindi. Hann krafist ess a setja hnapp skrifbori sitt svo hann gti rafrnt loka heinar konur(gentile woman) inni skrifstofu sinni.

Matt Lauer naugai konum svo illa a kalla urfti sjkrabla skrifstofu hans NBC. En a var fyrir MeToo # hreyfinguna.

Whopping Tales Of The Mainstream https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2020/06/01/whopping-tales-of-the-mainstream

g ver a vara ig vi v a vi erum lei kreppu sem er miklu verri en 1933 Amerka ea 1923 skaland.

Hversu slm verur essi KREPPA? https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2020/11/13/just-how-bad-will-this-depression-get/

Tilvsanir: g ver a viurkenna a egar g s essa grein fyrst kva g a senda hluta hennar til a vara alla vi. https://www.distributednews.com/475569.html

Uppruni eirra var barnavernd

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/

ANDI AGN


" HLDDU" svo verir ekki "hddur." Flk er ekki a gera uppreisn gegn hlutum sem eru rangir!

Holocaust eftirlifandi segir: g bjargai mnu eigin lfi me v a vera „grandi andstingur “ (uppreisnarseggur)-Flk (Bandarkjamenn) er ekki a gera uppreisn gegn hlutum sem eru rangir!

a sem mr finnst hugavert vi ummli Veru er a ll alrissamflg sem stjrna er af harstjrum starfa grundvallaratrium eins, hvort sem a er fasistastjrn (hgri vngur) eins og skaland nasista Hitlers var, ea a er kommnistastjrn (vinstri vinstri) eins og Rssland Stalns, ea Kna Mao:

Bir ailar halda uppi „rttindum samflagsins“ yfir rttindum einstaklingsins og eir nota tta, venjulega tmum „strs“, til a setja upp eftirlitsrki.

g vissi a g bjargai lfi mnu me v a vera (merktur) „Andstingur- me grunar rskun." (" uppreisnarseggur“)
a er einmitt nna sem er mjg mikil rf essari kennslustund.
Fullornir eru ekki a gera uppreisn gegn hlutum sem eru rangir.
Flki er hent til og fr, synja um elilegt samneyti og a fylgir
v bara eins og kindur/sauir.

(Innskot anda. Skipunum stjrnvalda = "Hlddu" svo verir ekki "Hddur" )
a er eitthva mjg rangt vi etta.
Hluti ess sem er rangt er hugmyndin um a fylgja bara valdinu n ess a huga,hva ef au hafa rangt fyrir sr?
Hva ef etta er ekki mr til hagsbta?

Af hverju?
etta er mjg httulegt ar sem a vi eigum svo miki af flki, gu flki, flki sem telur a a s a gera rtt.

ANDI AGN.

Nazism, COVID-19 and the destruction of modern medicine:

An interview with Vera Sharav, Part One



Vera Sharav says: What I find interesting about Vera’s comments, is that all totalitarian societies ruled by tyrants basically operate the same, whether it is a fascist regime (Right-wing) like Hitler’s Nazi Germany was, or it is a communist regime (Left-wing) like Stalin’s Russia, or Mao’s China: Both sides uphold the “rights” of the “community” over the rights of the individual, and they use fear, usually during a time of “war,” to install a surveillance state.

Alliance for Human Research Protection

Advancing Voluntary, Informed Consent to Medical Intervention

https://ahrp.org/

Stand for Health Freedom

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/blog/an-interview-with-vera-sharav/


https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/holocaust-survivor-i-saved-my-own-life-by-being-oppositional-defiant-americans-are-not-rebelling-against-things-that-are-wrong/


FALSKUR FARALDUR- RANNSKN LEIIR LJS TENGSL MILLI GRMNA-SREFNISSKORTS OG BLTAPPA.

Masks Cause Damage:GRMUR VALDA SKAA.

Study Reveals Mask-Hypoxia-Blood Clot Connection

RANNSKN LEIIR LJS TENGSL MILLI GRMNA-SREFNISSKORTS OG BLTAPPA.

Vi skulum hugsa um a sm stund.
Sumir eins og Dr. Robert Young telja a COVID s blstorknun en ekki veira eli snu.
a er hnan og egg dmi, en hvort a er srefnisskortur sem leiir til COVID, ea COVID leiir til srefnisskorts, ea hvor byrjar hnignunina ar sem au nrast hvort af ru, eru sterkar vsbendingar um tengsl - a v gefnu a COVID s nr agreindur sjkdmur (sem er erfitt a sna ljsra einkenna og a SARS-CoV-2 og stahfingar Kochs hafa brugist).

COVID-19 Regnhlfar samtk til a starfa me flsuum heimsfaraldri:
1.Ekki sjkdmur,
1. ekki orsk
COVID-19 Umbrella Term to Operate a Fake Pandemic:
Not 1 Disease, Not 1 Cause
https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/
ljsi essa, a a bera grmu er a versta sem gtir gert, smitaur ea ekki, v a hindrar lfsnausynlega srefnisfli itt!
Dissenter Oregon heldur fram:
https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/60.561
„g s fyrir mr flk sem annars myndi lifa af COVID-19, a a festa grmu sig til ess a
vernda ara er raun drepa sjlfan sig…
g er viss um a getur bori kennsl mrg vandaml sem auka bltappa httu fyrir almenning me tilskipari grmu notkun.
N egar taka miljnir manns blynningar lyf til a halda lfi.
Hvernig getur a veri g hugmynd a hindra nttrulega storknunarhfni eirra sem er egar skert?
Og hva me flk sem er ekki mevita um a a er me storknunar sjkdm og gengur san um me grmu vinnunni klukkustundum saman? …
Af hverju hafa ekki veri settar upp httu vivaranir vegna afar alvarlega og hugsanlega banvnna aukaverkana af v a bera grmu, srstaklega N95?
Hvernig gat einhver hfur heilbrigisfulltri ekki n egar vita um vel stafesta bltappa httu vi a gera grmu notkun a skyldu,valdandi srefnisskorti hj fjlda flks, srstaklega COVID-19 sjklinga? “

Bara t fr heilbrigissjnarmii, erum ekki a tala um lgmta ea trarlega tti, er grmu notkun mjg skaleg hugmynd vegna tengsla vi srefnisskort og bltappa.
Hvenr num vi eim punkti ar sem gagnrninn fjldi flks httir a fylgja essarri geveiki?
Ma 2020 segir rannskn
CDC a grmur su ekki rangursrkar, hvorki fyrir frskt ea sjkt flk.
Skoau mean essa nju rannskn
Rstafanir vi lyfjum inflensu heimsfaraldri heilsufars agerum -
Persnulegar verndar- og umhverfis rstafanir samykkt af Alja heilbrigismla stofnuninni (WHO) og CDC (Center for Disease Control) sem birt var vefsu CDC ar sem hn segir a rannsknin hafi veri
„ger undirbningi fyrir run leibeininga Aljaheilbrigis mlastofnunarinnar um lyfjameferar notkun og hlutunar vegna inflensu heimsfaraldurs lkningum. “
etta var rannskn sem var srstaklega sett upp fyrir COVID „heimsfaraldur.“
Niurstaan?
Grmur eru ekki rangursrkar!
g vitna beint rannsknina:
„ kerfisbundinni endurskoun okkar bentum vi 10 RCTs [Random Controlled/handahfs strar Rannsknir] sem greindu fr rannsknarstofu stafestri inflensuveiru skingu, og virkni ess a nota grmur ti samflaginu.
r bkmenntum sem gefnar voru t 1946 - 27. jl 2018. samantektar greiningu, vi fundum enga marktka minnkun inflensu smiti me notkun andlits grmna. “

a skiptir ekki mli hvort ert veikur og smitaur og reynir a vernda ara (stva tbreisluna), ea FRSKUR og SKTUR a reyna a verja ig - grmur bja enga verulega vernd vi a gera a annan htt:

„a eru takmarkaar vsbendingar um rangur eirra vi a koma veg fyrir smit inflensu veiru annahvort egar hann er borinn af sktum manni til a stjrna uppsprettum ea egar hann er borinn af sktum einstaklingum til a draga r vhrifum. Kerfisbundin endurskoun okkar fann engin marktk hrif andlitsgrmna smit inflensu sem stafest var rannsknarstofu. “

essar rannsknir eru einnig byggar eirri forsendu a flk noti grmur rtt, sem er mjg rausnarleg forsenda, mia vi mlalausu klta grmur sem flk notar, stareynd a eir eru almennt ekki vel innsiglair hli andlitsins og stareynd a flk hefur tilhneigingu til a fikta eim.
Rng notkun hefur raun fug hrif; a eykur httu smiti:
„Rtt notkun andlitsmaska er nausynleg vegna ess a vieigandi notkun gti auki httu flutningi.“
Og hin spennandi niurstaa er…
Vi fundum ekki vsbendingar um a
skuragera andlitsgrmur su rangursrkar til a draga r skingu af vldum inflensu sem stafest er rannsknarstofu, hvorki egar r eru bornar af sktum einstaklingum (eftirlits stjrnun) ea einstaklingum almenna samflaginu til a draga r nmi eirra.“

BOOM!!!
annig a CDC og WHO hafa raun og veru viurkennt me eigin orum a, a grmur virki ekki gegn inflensu lkum sjkdmum, sama hver er me .
VAKNI!!!!
Skoau greiningu Ben Swann hr.

Grmu notkunar htanir og viurlg halda fram a svfa..
mean eru borgarstjrar, bankastjrar og arir valdshafandi embttismenn a tfra alls kyns stjrnskipulegar og frnlegar htanir og viurlg gegn eim sem voga sr a nota ekki grmur.

" A ER ENGIN STA FYRIR FLK A GANGA UM ME GRMUR. MIJUM FARALDRI, A VERA ME GRMU GTI LTI FLKI LA AEINS BETUR, A GTI JAFNVEL HINDRA BLDROPA, EN A ER EKKI A BA TIL HINA FULLKOMNU VERND EINS OG FLK TELUR A A GERI, OG OFT ERU MSAR AFLEIINGAR- FLK HELDUR FRAM A FIKTA GRMUNUM OG HALDUR FRAM A SNERTA ANDLITI SR."

SKIFTIR ENGU MLI HVA UPPLST FLK TELUR,VSINDIN ERU A SNA OKKUR FRAM HTTUNA AF NOTKUN GRMNA FYRIR VENJULEGT FLK /

HVA SEM EINKENNISKLTT FLK TELUR OKKUR TR UM VEGNA SREFNISURRAR OG BLTAPPA HTTU.

HVERSU LENGI TLAR FLK A LTA POLITKUSA STJRNA HEILSU SINN?

ANDI AGN.

******************************************

Mask Threats and Penalties Continue to Soar

Meanwhile, mayors, governors and other power-hungry officials are rolling out all sorts of unconstitutional and absurd threats and penalties for those that dare not wear a face diaper or face nappy.

Authorities in Broward County, Florida, have issued an Emergency Order that mandates people wear masks inside their own homes; Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser issued an executive order for mandatory mask-wearing with a $1,000 citation for violations, and officials in Englewood Colorado passed a law which allows them to potentially jail people for 1 year for not wearing a mask.

Mask Wearing: The Calculated Divide-and-Conquer Strategy

Masks have become a very divisive issue among people, all by design. This fake pandemic has been coldly and brilliantly calculated to seize power, keep people in fear and set them at each others’ throats. Instead of focusing on Bill Gates, the Rockefeller Foundation or other aspects of the NWO (New World Order), people are fighting with themselves over masks, with those refusing to do so being attacked for being ‘disrespectful’ and ‘irresponsible’ regardless of their lawful rights and their ability to make their own health choices.

A recent commenter on DavidIcke.com wrote that people are too busy fighting among themselves, making each other the enemy, that they can’t see the real enemy that is working to enslave 99.99% of the world:

“I know we are all one in the end, I still feel like these people are my “enemy” and that makes me feel really uncomfortable to say the least, and they feel like I’m their enemy, when the real enemy is outside orchestrating this whole movie script.”

Final Thoughts

So much has happened in the last 5 months that it has been truly surreal. Just recall what Dr. Anthony Fauci said at the beginning of the academic before he changed his tune to march in lockstep to the agenda:

“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think it is. And often there are unintended consequences – people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”

Regardless of what uninformed people think, science is showing how serious mask-wearing can be for ordinary people due to the hypoxia-blood clot link.

How much longer are people going to be given their medical marching orders by politicians?

*****

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent newssiteThe Freedom Articlesand senior researcher atToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is onSteemit.

Sources:

https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/132/4/452/103891/Hypoxia-downregulates-protein-S-expression

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uleQ1jGezNI

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180802115657.htm

https://dissentersandskepticsoforegon.wordpress.com/2020/07/13/the-lethal-link-between-masks-hypoxia-and-blood-clots/

https://thefreedomarticles.com/doctor-reveals-corona-effect-blood-coagulation/

https://thefreedomarticles.com/exposing-the-occult-corona-initiation-ritual/

https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy_7a8GNN4Q

https://www.prisonplanet.com/broward-county-emergency-order-mandates-people-wear-facial-coverings-inside-their-own-homes.html

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/508526-dc-mayor-issues-order-requiring-masks-outside-home

https://www.activistpost.com/2020/07/colorado-town-threatens-up-to-a-year-in-jail-for-people-who-dont-wear-masks.html

https://davidicke.com/2020/07/21/message-from-a-mask-refusenik-in-israel/

https://techstartups.com/2020/07/01/dr-fauci-march-theres-no-reason-walking-around-mask-changed-video/

https://masks4all.co/about-us/

https://www.technocracy.news/masks-are-neither-effective-nor-safe-a-summary-of-the-science/

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/science-futures/wearing-a-mask-offers-little-if-any-protection-from-infection-harvard-doctors/

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/19/are-face-masks-effective.aspx

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kznu3iH1rm01/

https://www.technocracy.news/censored-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covid-19-social-policy-and-why-face-masks-dont-work/


GRMUR VALDA SKAA: Rannskn snir tengsl milli grmu notkunar og srefnis urrar og bltappa.

Masks Cause Damage: Study Reveals Mask-Hypoxia-Blood Clot Connection
Published 2 hours ago on July 23, 2020
By Makia Freeman
Last Updated on July 23, 2020
https://thefreedomarticles.com/hypoxia-blood-clot-connection-study-cdc-who-study/
Grmur valda skaa:
Rannskn leiir ljs tengingu vi grmu notkun og srefnisskort og bltappa

https://397145-1250082-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/mask-hypoxia-blood-clot-connection.jpg


SAGAN:
Rannskn 2018 snir alvarlega tengingu vi srefnisskort og bltappa. ar sem srefnisskortur er til staar vi srefnisgjf, gti a a vera me grmur leitt til alvarlegra ea jafnvel banvnna heilsufars vandamla hj sumum.
HRIF:
N egar CDC rannskn fr ma 2020 (me WHO tttku) hefur komist a eirri niurstu a grmur su ekki rangursrkar til a stva smit inflensu, Hversu mikil snnunarggn urfa menn til a htta a klast grmum og htta a vera sinn eigin rll? (rll hrslururs og tta)
Alvarleg og hugsanlega banvn tengsl vi srefnisskort og bltappa

https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/132/4/452/103891/
Hypoxia-downregulates-protein-S-expression

hefur fundist me vsindarannskn sem ber yfirskriftina
Sykurski neglir niur tjningu prteins.
https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/132/4/452/103891/Hypoxia-downregulates-protein-S- expression
Rannsknin sem birt var jl 2018 lsir v hvernig srefnisskortur (lgur styrkur srefnis) dregur r S-prteini bli, nttrulegu segavarnarefni.
etta leiir til aukinnar httu run segamyndunar ea bltappa, sem getur veri lfshttulegt i sumum tilfellum.


Rannsknin var einstk a v leiti a etta var fyrsta skipti sem rannsknir sndu a srefnisskortur gti auki httu bltappa vegna sameinda stna.
Alheims tlunin um reglur me grmu notkun er ekki aeins stjrnskipuleg og lgmt hj mrgum jum, heldur er hn lka a valda srefnisskorti meal almennings.
Til vibtar vi srefnisskort og bltappa tengslin, leiir srefnisskortur einnig til reytu, hfuverkja, glei, vitsmunalegrar skeringar, lgs orkustigs og minnkas nmis og veldur annig fjlda tjni banna.

andi AGN.....


SUMAR SLIN GTI DREPI KRNA VRUSINN INNAN VI 30 MN. SEGIR NRRI RANNSKN.

Safer outside: The virus finds it harder to survive in warmer summer weather. Gareth Fuller/PA Wire

Sterkt slarljs veldur v a krna vrusinn rotnar, verur nnast a engu aeins 30 mntum, samkvmt nrri rannskn.

SUMAR SLIN GTI DREPI KRNA VRUSINN INNAN VI 30 MN. SEGIR NRRI RANNSKN.

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/summer-sun-could-kill-coronavirus-in-just-30-minutes-new-study-shows 39307797.html?fbclid=IwAR1oU8BVlEmB2ihOp7--MgvSfZX2FeF8Zscp3Moyva6J9czSnvsHx1cMe3I
rtt fyrir a fjldasamkomur hafi veri tengdar aukningu smiti sndu rannsknir eftirlauna veirufringa fr bandarska hernum og matvla- og lyfjaeftirlit Bandarkjanna a slarljs drepur vrusinn fljtt, sem ir a lklegt er a flk s ruggara ti/utandyra.
Reyndar gti veri skalegt fyrir flk a vera sttkv innandyra, segir rannsknin.

mean heimsfaraldri Spnsku flensunnar st ri 1918 komust lknar a v a sjklingar sem hjkra var utandyra farnaist betur en eim sem voru innandyra.


(Innskot fr anda-g tel a fara ljs hefi lka vari flk-hitinn- bara ekki bera nein baneitru krem sig hvort sem um slb ea ljsab er a ra!
au innihalda mrg efni sem eru jafnvel bnnu umhverfinu-annig a a getur ekki veri okkur mannskepnunum hollt frekar en umhverfinu sem vi lifum .

EINA SEM HEFI VERI HTT A HAFA OPI/VIRKT LOCK DOWNINU-HEFI VERI LJSAB-ALLTAF STTHREINSA FYRIR OG EFTIR OG VI TKUM LKA UPP D-VITAMIN AR A MEGI ALLS EKKI SEGJA FR V..TREKA AFTUR A NOTA ENGIN KREM!! AU BLOKKERA LKA UPPTKU D-VITAMIN.
En ttinn drepur nmiskerfi!)

ANDI AGN..


Blusettir einstaklingar dreifa mislingum: Skjl fr WHO, Merck, CDC stafesta a.

https://www.greenmedinfo.health/blog/vaccinated-spreading-measles-who-merck-cdc-documents-confirms

The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm

Skrifa 26. October 2018.
Rannsknir sna a blusettur einstaklingur getur ekki aeins smitast af mislingum, heldur getur hann einnig dreift eim til annarra sem eru einnig blusettir gegn eim - sem afsannar a margra skammta blusetningar me MMR bluefni er ekki „97% rangursrk,“ eins og va er haldi fram.

Htti a kenna eim sem blusetja ekki um- egar bluefni virkar ekki!

Stareyndin er s, a tilfelli af vldum ess a bluefni virka ekki -eru t.d. gllu ( ll vara getur veri gllu-lyf eru vara!) hefur olli v a 99% bum sem uppfylla blusetningar hefur tt sr sta ratugi.

Hr eru aeins nokkur dmi sem greint er fr lknisfriritum:

1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, "An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced." They concluded: "We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune."1

1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, "A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures," an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: "This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy."2

1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, "early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity ... due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: "...measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations."3

1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was "largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage," but following an extensive review the researchers concluded "Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.4

1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.5

1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, "[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised." Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.6

Blusettir einstaklingar dreifa mislingum:
Skjl fr WHO, Merck, CDC stafesta a.
The Vaccinated Spreading Measles: WHO, Merck, CDC Documents Confirm
April 9th 2019

Fyrir 20 rum reyndist MMR bluefni smita nnast alla vitakendur ess me mislingum.

Vivrun framleiandans Mercks tengir MMR hugsanlega vi banvnt form heilablgu (encephalitis) af vldum mislinga.

Af hverju er ekki greint fr essum ggnum?

Rannsakendur greindu fr v ri 1995 Journal of Clinical Microbiology, sem bar yfirskriftina

„Uppgtvast hefur mislinga RNA vrus vagprufum hj blusettum “, og greindu vsindamenn vagsni r nlega MMR blusettum 15 mnaa gmlum brnum og unglingum og greindu fr essum slandi niurstum eins og fer hr eftir:


Mislinga RNA vrus fannst hj 10 af 12 brnum tveggja vikna sna tkutmabilinu.

sumum tilvikum greindist RNA mislinga vrus einum degi eftir blusetningu ea svo seint sem 14 dgum eftir a brnin voru blusett. RNA fyrir mislingaveiru fannst einnig vagsnum fr llum af fjrum unglingunum milli 1 og 13 daga eftir blusetningu.

Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?

Hversvegna er Kna a f mislinga tilfelli egar einungis 1% eru blusettir? Sem s 99% eru blusettir!

September 20th 2014

Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?

https://www.greenmedinfo.health/blog/why-china-having-measles-outbreaks-when-99-are-vaccinated-2

Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population — Israel, July–August 2017

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6742a4.htm

Hr er grein fr CDC sjlft fr mislinga tilfellum srael sem fylgir aldurstengdum blusetningum- .e. annig a flestir eru a fullu blusettir mia vi a vera ornir 18 ra og eir sem eru undir 18 ra eru a fullu blusettir samkvmt aldri hvers og eins, samkvmt "ungbarna blusetningum" en vi erum vst "ungbrn" til 18 ra aldurs dag mia vi sjlfris aldurinn.. (a sama gildir hr landi)..

ANDI AGN..

REFERENCES

1T L Gustafson, A W Lievens, P A Brunell, R G Moellenberg, C M Buttery, L M Sehulster. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 26 ;316(13):771-4. PMID: 3821823

2R M Davis, E D Whitman, W A Orenstein, S R Preblud, L E Markowitz, A R Hinman. A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep ;126(3):438-49. PMID: 3618578

3B S Hersh, L E Markowitz, R E Hoffman, D R Hoff, M J Doran, J C Fleishman, S R Preblud, W A Orenstein. A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar ;81(3):360-4. PMID: 1994745

4N Boulianne, G De Serres, B Duval, J R Joly, F Meyer, P Dry, M Alary, D Le Hnaff, N Thriault.[Major measles epidemic in the region of Quebec despite a 99% vaccine coverage]. Can J Public Health. 1991 May-Jun;82(3):189-90. PMID: 1884314

5S A de Oliveira, W N Soares, M O Dalston, M T de Almeida, A J Costa. Clinical and epidemiological findings during a measles outbreak occurring in a population with a high vaccination coverage. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995 Oct-Dec;28(4):339-43. PMID: 866883

6N Coetzee, G D Hussey, G Visser, P Barron, A Keen. The 1992 measles epidemic in Cape Town--a changing epidemiological pattern. S Afr Med J. 1994 Mar ;84(3):145-9. PMID: 7740350

References

[1] Kaic B, Gjenero-Margan I, Aleraj B. Spotlight on Measles 2010: Excretion of Vaccine Strain Measles Virus in Urine and Pharyngeal Secretions of a Child with Vaccine Associated Febrile Rash Illness, Croatia, March 2010. Eurosurveillance 2010 15(35).

[2] Nestibo L, Lee BE, Fonesca K et al. Differentiating the wild from the attenuated during a measles outbreak. Paediatr Child Health Apr. 2012; 17(4).

[3] Murti M, Krajden M, Petric M et al. Case of Vaccine Associated Measles Five Weeks Post-Immunisation, British Columbia, Canada, October 2013. Eurosurveillance Dec. 5, 2013; 18(49).

[4] Antona D, Lvy-Bruhl D, Baudon C, Freymuth F, Lamy M, Maine C, Floret D, Parent du Chatelet I. Measles elimination efforts and 2008-2011 outbreak, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;19(3):357-64. doi: 10.3201/eid1903.121360. PubMed PMID: 23618523; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3647670. Free full text Related citations

Originally published:2015-01-30

Article updated: 2019-04-09


BLUEFNA SKAAR SJALDAN SKRIR.Bramttku hjkrunarfringur deilir upplifun af bluefnavibrgum (aukaverkunum).

Vaccine Injuries are Seldom Reported

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/everything-you-learned-about-cause-polio-wrong

http://healthyfamiliesforgod.com/2015/11/er-nurse-shares-experiences-vaccine-reactions12524009_10208462739754204_6696252164090720369_n.jpg

November 18, 2015

Barnalknar segja oft a eir hafi aldrei s bluefna vibrg fyrr/ur.

Flest alvarlegu tilfellin eiga sr sta Bramttkunni. A auki vita margir lknar og hjkrunarfringar ekki einu sinni hvernig ekkja eigi alvarleg bluefna vibrg.

Og eins og vi munum sj, er miki um yfirhylmingar egar kemur a vibrgum vi bluefnum.

essvegna er g ng/ur me a geta deilt me ykkur sjnarhorni /reynslu hjkrunarfrings Bramtttku sambandi vi alvarleg vibrg vi bluefnum.

Hann var a vnn a a deila sgu sinni me mr samt annarri lfsreynslu sem leiddi til essarrar stru hans a hjlpa flki sem hjkrunarfringur.

Nu r bolla af te/kaffi og hlustau sgu hans.

g vona a ALLIR foreldrar lesi hana.

Sem bramttku hjkrunarfringur, hef g s yfirhylmingarnar.

Hvert heldur a brnin fari egar au f bluefna vibrg?

au fara Bramttkuna. au koma til mn.

g get ekki einu sinni reynt a giska hversu oft gegnum rin g hef s bluefna vibrg koma gegnum Bramttkuna sem g vinn . n ess a ka neitt, eru a hundruir.

Stundum var eins og a vru eitt til tv tilfelli einni vakt, hverri vakt, vikum saman. kom eins og dauur tmi, og g fkk ekki neitt tilfelli eina til tvr vikur, svo fkk g tilfelli hverri nttu nokkrar vikur. etta var algengt.

Einu sinni var g a jlfa hjkrunarfrinema Bravaktinn, sem var a tskrifast, og var reynslu hringferinni hjkrunarsklanum.

essi nemi og g frum upp mttkuna til a leysa mttku hjkrunarfringinn ar af.

g lagi formlegt prf fyrir au um a hva au ttu a spyrja og leita eftir sem mttku hjkrunarfringur hj brnum sem kmu fr barnalknum.

g geri a a venju a spyrja um nmisagerir/blusetningar um lei og brnin komu inn.

Neminn var undrandi og spuri hversvegna, og g sagi nemanum a a vri vegna ess a vi sjum bluefna vibrg hverjum degi og a vri eirra vinna (hjkrunarfringanna) a taka eftir eim, lta lknir vita og foreldrana, og senda skrslu til VAERS / Alvarlegra bluefna vibraga skrningar kerfisins:

https://vaers.hhs.gov/index

g hugsa a eitthva ra vald hafi greinilega brosa a vileitni minni til a opna augu annarra hjkrunarfringa, vegna ess a innan 10 mntna kom kona me barni sitt upp a mttkuborinu. Sem hafi skyndilega fengi rosa han hita og var mki.

g spuri hvort a barni vri blusett samkvmt aldri ess. Mirn svarai a hann hefi veri blusettur bara nokkrum tmum ur.

g gjai augunum nemann, sem leit t fyrir a vera sjokki og sem horfi mig vantr.

g kinkai kolli, sagi honum a muna etta, fr san bak vi me murina og barni hennar til a klra skounina. egar g var binn kom g aftur og settist niur me nemanum og spuri hva hva hann hefi lrt a sem lii vri af nttinni.

Fyrstu vibrgin: “a sem mr var kennt um bluefni er ekki satt”.

g hefi ekki geta sagt etta betur. essi nemi mun vera eins og g, gta hagsmuna sjklinga sinna me augun galopin.

Tilfellin voru yfirleitt eins og oftast sr enginn tenginguna. Barni kemur inn annahvort me hita 105 Fahrenheit, ea flog, ea svenmki/ vaknar ekki, ea skyndileg alvarleg veikindi, skur sem ekki er hgt a stva, (Innskot anda –enchephalitis cry ea heilablgu grtur-skerandi nstandi srsauka vein) krampar, GI inclusion, etc.

Ein af fyrstu spurningunum sem g myndi spyrja sem mttku hjkrunarfringur er, eru au blusett samkvmt blusetningar prgramminu?

etta er rugg spurning sem enginn von og enginn skilur dpri merkingu hennar.

Foreldrar (og samstarfsflk) halda venjulega a g s a athuga hvort etta s einhver sjkdmur sem blusetningar ttu a koma veg fyrir, egar g er rauninni a sj hversu stutt a er san barni var blusett, til a skera r um hvort a etta su bluefna vibrg.

Alltof oft hef g heyrt foreldra segja etta:

“J au eru a, barnalknirinn blusetti hann/hana morgun samkvmt tlun ungbarnaeftirlits heimskninni og sagi a hann/hn vri fullkomlega heilbrig/ur!”

Ef g hefi fengi dollar hvert skifti sem g heyri essi svr, gti g flogi frtt til Evrpu.

En hr er tturinn sem truflar mig meira en etta.

llum eim tilfellum sem g sendi skrslur, hef g ALDREI s einhvern hjkrunarfring/kandidat senda skrslur til VAERS. g hef sent skrslur til VAERS.

En g er EINI hjkrunarfringurinn sem g hef hitt sem sendir VAERS skrslur.

g hef heldur aldrei hitt lkni sem sendir skrslur til VAERS.

Hafu a huga a g er binn a starfa fjlda sjkrahsa fjlda fylkja, og lklega me vel yfir hundra lkna og 300-400 hjkrunarfringa.

g hef unni strum sjkrahsum (San Francisco Bay Area Metro 40 bed ER (bramttku) og Las Vegas NV Metro 44 bed ER (bramttku) ) og litlum sjkrahsum (Rural access 2 bed ER, remote community 4 bed ER) og allt ar milli. egar g segi ALDREI, meina g ALDREI..

g hef meira a segja gert v a sitja bersndi sta egar g er a fylla t skrslurnar til VAERS, annig a sem flestir sgju hva g er a gera, til a f flk til a spyrja ”hva ertu a gera”…vibrg til a koma af sta samrum vi flk…

Og llum tilfellum, ef a hjkrunarlii varpai mig, voru eirra vibrg “g hef aldrei gert etta" ea ”g vissi ekki a vi gtum gert etta” ea a versta,

"Hva er VAERS?” sem var reyndar algengustu vibrgin.

Vibrg fr lknum?

gn. Algjr neitun v a taka tt umrunni ea viurkenna a sem g var a gera ea hva VAERS vri.

Hver er niurstaan ? VAERS er sorglega vanskr. g er snnun ess.

Fyrsti staurinn sem foreldrar koma me brnin sn bluefna vibrgum er Bramttaka, og sem Bramttku starfsmaur hef g ALDREI hitt einhvern sem skri eina skrslu, rtt fyrir a sj hundruir tilfella af greinilegum bluefna skuum einstaklingum.

Hva segir a um skr tilfelli?

CDC/HHS (sjkdmsvarnar eftirliti og ?) viurkenna a VAERS er vanskr, og lklega aeinss um 1/10 af raunverlegum fjlda skaara.

g berst fyrir v a s skr , og fr persnulegri reynslu myndi g segja raunverulega talan hj VAERS vri nr 1/1000, ekki 1/10.

Og loka tturinn af v, er a g hef sjlfur s hreinar og klrar yfirhylmingar fr lknum. g hef s lknaskrslur og sjkraskrr vsvitandi falsaar.

g hef risi upp gegn lknum sem neituu a skr sjkrasrsluna a barni hefi veri blusett 4 tmum fyrr og var fullkomlega heilbrigt ur en a var blusett, en snir skyndilega engin vibrg, er a f flog, hita um 105 og a rannsknin, LP, og myndgreining stafesta heilabjg og heilablgu.

g minnti lknirinn a egar hann var a skrifa skrsluna a etta barn hefi veri blusett nokkrum tmum fyrr.

Og a lokum er algjrlega loka essa stareynd og lknirinn sendir fr sr skrslu sem segir heilablga af ekktri orsk.(INNSKOT ANDA. ETTA ER N REYNDAR A SEM KALLAST SKJALAFALS)

g spyr lknirinn a v hvort hann muni senda skrslu til VAERS og eir halda v fram etta hafi ekkert me etta a gera, etta s eingngu “tilviljun” og a ekkert skuli vera skr, au (bluefnin) su rugg og virk.

g minni a a VAERS s skrslukerfi fyrir LL einkenni sem su samtis blusetningum, hvort sem orskin s talin vera tengd eim ea ekki, og g f frvsunina um a eir su ekki a skr etta s vegna ess a hn (blusetningin) hafi ekkert me etta a gera.

Spa undir teppi af strstu ger dmi er a sem sr sta, og allt sem bendir blusetningu er kerfisbundi fjarlgt ea sleppt a skr skrsluna.

Fullkomi dmi um etta er sjkrabla starfsflk sem kom inn me skrslu sem innihlt stareynda a barni hafi veri blusett aeins klukkutma ur en einkennin komu fram.

Lknirinn s til ess a etta skrslubla hvarf dularfullan htt og sem var til ess a a var ekki skr me skrslu sjklinsins. (Innskot anda. Og ekki til VAERS.)

Svo j, g hef s hylmt yfir me bluefna skum fr fyrstu hendi. g veit a etta er viljandi gert og virkt innan lknasamflagsins. g veit a etta er a gerast.

Og ofan a er algjr afneitun tengingu vi bluefni og algjr yfirhylming, eir neita einnig a skr til VAERS sem er tlast til a s gert fyrir ALLT, sem er jafnvel ekki neinn htt gruna um a tengjast bluefnum.

etta er kerfisbundin bling upplsingum og tlfri.

Og j, tilfellunum sem g lsi hr a ofan, talai g vi foreldrana, og g sagi eim fr VAERS, og g byrjai ml fyrir og skrifai skrslu. g vingai mli gegnum kortaskrningu mna, svo a muni mjg lklega vera grafi og gleymt.

g hef upplifa spillingu og blingu sannleikans lknissamflaginu varandi bluefni fr fyrstu hendi fr sjnarhorni einstaklings. a gerist daglega.

g er hvorki me ea mti bluefnum. g er upplstur einstaklingur.

g tri v a , sem foreldri, ttir a vita um httuna sem fylgir, og hn ER raunveruleg.

g tel a ttir a vera mevitaur um a af einhverri stu er einhver tilviljanakenndur minnihluta hpur banna raun nmur fyrir essum skelfilegu alvarlegu aukaverkunum sem geta eli snu valdi filangri ftlun.

J tlurnar eru lgar. J g s FJLDA tilfella, en g vann mjg nnumkfnu og fjlmennu svi. Hrilegu aukaverkanirnar eru a mnu mati kringum 0.5% almennum blusetningum.

Undantekningin er Gardasil, a bluefni er SKELFILEGT a mnu mati og virist vera me fjlda alvarlegra aukaverkana vibraga, g myndi kanski giska a talan s a h a vera 5-7% vert hpinn. En a er anna mlefni sjlfu sr.

g vildi a g gti sagt hva a vri sem ylli v a barn yri lklergra til a vera 0.5% hpnum svo g gti s merkin, og sagt foreldrunum a, svo a foreldrarnir gtu hugsa alvarlega um a, en g get a ekki.

Enginn getur a. a virist svo sannarlega vera handahfskennt.

Stundum er a vikvmur heilsuveill og veikbura krakki og a vri skiljanlegra a au vru verulega meiri httu alvarlegum aukaverkunum. En stundum er a fullkomlega heilbrigt, sterkt fullbura ungbarn n sjkdma. rtt fyrir a drengir hafi tilhneigingu til a f vibrg oftar. Sennilega voru 2/3 af alvarlegum vibrgum sem g hef s hj drengjum.

En sannleikurinn er s a getur ekki sagt til um a me skoun.

Annahvort barni, ea heilsusgu eirra, ea fjlskyldusgu. a kemur niur sns. Einhverra hluta vegna er barn bara nmara fyrir essum sprautum en allir arir eru.

Tri g blusetningar? Mestmegnis. g tri v a oft s hugmyndin g.

g er sammla sambandi vi notkun hjlparefna ann htt sem au eru notu n og hvernig FDA heldur leyndum vibtarefnum sem hafa veri prfu me gum rangri og me frri aukaverkunum og betri nmisvibrgum ratugi.

En g get ekki breytt v. g held a au virki, einhvern htt.

g hef lesi um a hvernig au geta breytt v hvernig nmiskerfi virkar.

Tilfrsla lkamsvessum og innanfrumu vibrgum, svo a anna fr ofur vibrg og hitt ng vibrg, annig a bluefni getur bkstaflega gert ig nmari fyrir kvenum veikindum (aftur, nnur hjlparefni hafa a mestu laga etta en au hafa samt ekki veri samykkt 15 rum seinna).

g hef s hvernig bluefni raunverulega gaf einstaklingnum au veikindi sem a var hanna til a koma veg fyrir. (g er a tala um samanburar rannsknir. Skoau til dmis svnaflensu rannskn Kanadsku Heilbrigisstofnuninnar mrum.).

g hef s flk koma inn E.R. (bramttkuna) til mn me hettustt rtt fyrir a vera a fullu blusett gegn hettusttinni. Sama me hlaupablu. Og kghsta. Svona mtti lengi telja.

g hef lka s framleiendur sem stunda svik (sj alrkisml Bandarkjanna og tvo veirufringa hj Merck, varandi blygunarlaus svik sambandi vi MMR bluefni vog nauungar yfirhylmingu).

Ea lyfjainaurinn sem hefur vsvitandi og viljandi gefi flki sjkdma sem myndi drepa a bara til ess a gra (sj New York Times ar sem afhjpu voru innri minnisggn Bayer spilltri HIV lyfjamefer eirra me dreyraskislyf sem eir hldu fram a selja, EFTIR a eir uppgtvuu a eir vru a skja flki me HIV og san, egar eim var skipa af dmstl Bandarkjunum a htta slu, hldu eir fram a selja a erlendis).

En g viurkenni a, a fyrir essa fu heppnu virka essir hlutir. tt tlurnar su ekki stjarnfrilegar, virist a veita einhvers konar vernd hj meirihluta einstaklinga. Svo j. J, g tri a a s eitthva sem virkar.

En sannleikurinn er einhvers staar mijum veginum. Ekki eins slm og au lta t fyrir a vera, en miki minna rangursrk og hvergi nrri eins rugg og eir myndu vilja a tryir.

inai sem er hrist upp mnaarlega vegna hrilegra lyfjahneykslismla, ef A efast ekki um allt sem eir segja r, myndi mr finnast vera fyndinn. Og a er mitt hlutverk a gefa flki essi lyf.

Bara til a taka fram, sambandi vi nlegt hneyksli, hef g sustu 5 r veri a vara flk vi notkun Zofran megngu. Upplsingarnar voru fylgiselinum. a var vefsu framleiandans. a var PDR.

Eins var a llum forritum/app sem hgt er a hlaa niur og prentari IV lyfjabk. Upplsingarnar eru til staar.

a eru lknarnir sem eru a bregast almenningi.

Nna skyndilega er etta frtt llum fjlmium, a eru auglsingar um a og allir hlaupa um sjkrahsum og lta eins og eir hafi ekki haft hugmyndum etta.

Nei, vi vissum. Vi vissum a ll. Vi hldum bara ekki strikinu. etta kemur aftur a upplstu samykki. Eins og g sagi, g er memltur upplstu samykki. Algerlega allt sem vi gerum er me httu. Algjrlega ll lyf sem vi notum hafa httu.

getur teki Advil og fengi rija stigs bruna (Innskot anda. a kallast „lyfjabruni“ en tbrot eru lka aukaverkanir lyfja/bluefna og a sem vi sjum yfirbori harinnar byrjar innan okkur.. Pli aeins v hva bluefni/lyf eru bin a skaa okkur a innanveru ur en vibrgin vera snileg!) sem uppruna sinn undir yfirbori har innar. (=lyfjabruni).

Er a algengt? Fjrinn hafi a, nei.a er fjri sjaldgft eins og Heck.

En er a mgulegt? getur veri viss um a .

Og vi vitum a. Hversu margir hjkrunarfringar og lknar hafa sagt r a? Sama gildir um Benadryl.

Snt hefur veri fram rannsknum tlenl a a hefur valdi lifrarskemmdum llum skammtastrum hj brnum. LLUM. Hversu margir hjkrunarfringar og lknar hafa sagt r a?

Vi ljgum. ( ekki g)

En sem starfssttt ljgum vi, vi spum httunni undir teppi og vi sykurhum a. Vi gerum a hverjum degi, llum samskiptum. a er sannleikurinn!

Og ef verur a vera svo heppin a f einn sem ekki lgur a r, eru eir lklega einfaldlega frir um sannleikann og lesa aldrei fylgiseilinn ea PDR ea vivaranir vefsum framleienda.

a gildir um 99,9% allra starfsmanna heilsugslunni. Ja, allavega hefbundnu lyflkninga heilsugslunni.

Talau svo vi annan hjkrunarfring bramttkunnar.Erum vi a segja smu hlutina? Nei af hverju ekki?
Vegna ess a g hef lesi meira um mlefni, vegna ess a g hef sterka siferiskennd og hef siferilega skyldu gagnvart sjklingum mnum, og vegna ess a g mun einfaldlega ekki taka vi skipun og fylgja henni, bara til a fylgja henni, jafnvel a kosti mig starfi mitt.
a er vanalegt.

verur a muna a ota lyfjum a flki er a sem frir sjkrahsum tekjur.
A gagnrna lkna er g lei til a starfs umhverfi itt veri brilegt og reii stjrnendanna beinist a r.
a CT-sknnun s ekki veri a besta fyrir ig, ea rttltanleg, ea enganveginn nausynlegt, mun a fra sjkrahsinu mrg sund dollara, myndau r hva verur um auveldlega skiptanlega hjkrunarfringinn sem stendur vegi fyrir v. Gri.

Sannleikurinn er s a etta er a sem mli snst um. Gra.

Kallau mig grnan. g er a. Mr er alveg sama. g er salti gamli hundurinn eyimrkinni.. g hef unni mr bardaga r bramttkunni (E.R.), og g hef orspor sem fer undan mr.

g hef fengi viurkenningar fr llum sjkrahsum sem g hef starfa , ar meal verlaun, heiurs og viurkenningar sem ur voru aeins veittar flagsrgjfum og lknum. a veitir mr kvei frihelgis stig gegn ofsknum og a veitir mr mguleika a segja sannleikann,jafnvel a kosti sjkrahsi peninga. Vegna ess a g er of drmtur sem P. R. starfsmaur.

Svo vilt f sannleikann innan fr?

Hr hefur hann, lklega fr einum af handfylli flks sem munt aldrei a heyra a fr. ekktu httuna. Viurkenndu a ef gerir a, rllar teningunum.

Og J nmer barns ns GETUR komi upp. ert EKKI nmur.

g get ekki sagt fyrir um hvers vegna sumir krakkar eru nmir og arir ekki. g veit ekki afhverju a er annig. g vildi a g geri a. Enginn gerir essu svii.

a er skilvirkt hylmt yfir.

a er vita. etta er raunverulegt. Bluefni hjlpa. au hafa httu. Sem foreldri verur a taka a val upp eigin sptur og lifa me v.

En hugsau um essar mynduu astur.

kemur inn og sr mig og biur mig um a blusetja barni itt, g rtti r stafla af pappr sem er tommu ykkur og segi r a byrja a lesa og eftir tuttugu mntur kem g aftur me 100 hlia teninga (j, eir ba til , fr hlutverka leikjadgum dflissu og dreka.)

a er einfldun en hn er djpst sem gerir standi raunverulegt.

g skal afhenda r ennan 100 hlia tening og segja r a rlla honum. Ef a kemur upp nmer 1 mun barni itt f flog og mgulega vera fyrir hugsanlegum taugasjkdmum, en ef a kemur upp einhverju af hinum 99 tlunum er barni itt lagi.

Ef getur teki teninginn hendina og fr jkvu tkomuna, mun g sprauta barni itt. En verur a VITA og SAMYKKJA httuna ur en g tla a gera a. g tri eiginlega bara a a standa upp fyrir sjklingana mna.

g veit ekki hva var um essa atvinnugrein, en sem hjkrunafringur er starf okkar a standa milli sjklings og kerfis, til a vernda (sjklingana) fyrir kerfinu.tli g s ekki bara binn a f ng af hjkrunarfringum og lknum sem a „fylgja kerfinu“bara til a fara auveldu leiina.

a er ekkert strt leyndarml bak vi neitt af essu.

g les tmarit smitsjkdma, eiturefnafri, barnalkninga, bralkninga, BMJ, Lancet o.s.frv. Og g rannsaka PubMed gegnum NIH. Allt sem g er a segja er vitneskja sem almenningur tti a hafa.

etta er efni sem vi EIGUM a segja r. Fyrirgefu a vi gerum a ekki.

g reyni a taka afstu ar sem g get, en lok dagsins er g aeins einn hjkrunarfringur. “~ GuerillaRN

RN, CEN, EMT

*************************************************************

Mjg virtur hjkrunarfringur og me skilrki EMT og me 6 ra reynslu bramttku mrgum sjkrahsum og fyrrum lgreglumaur.

Bandarsk stjrnvld halda skjalaskr um skrar skrslur af bluefna skum og dausfllum sem kallast VAERS (Bluefna aukaverkana skrningar kerfi).

Vandamli er a mjg fir heilbrigisstarfsmenn skr bluefna skaa ea dausfll, annahvort vegna ess a au eru ekki jlfu til a ekkja au, ea vegna rstings innan eirra eigin starfsstttar um a skr au ekki. a a viurkenna a bluefni geti valdi skaa er faglegt sjlfsvg fyrir flesta lkna og heilbrigisstarfsflks.

essvegna er rsfjrungslega DOJ skrslan um bluefna tilfelli aeins a sna brota brot af eim tilfellum sem eru.

Einn staur sem vi getum fengi nasasjn af eim skum sem bluefni valda USA dag era skoa bramttku heimsknirnar.

Eins og i geti s skrslunni hr a ofan, eru flest uppgjrs tilfellin vegna tilfella orsakaa af flensu bluefninu, Guillain-Barr Syndrome (GBS) er algengasti skainn af vldum flensu blusetningarinnar. GBS er lmunar sjkdmur sem rst nmiskerfi einstaklingsinsog skemmir taugafrumurnar og veldur vvaslappleika og stundum lmun a er mjg lkt einkennum lmunarveiki (polio) ..

Ef fari er me ig bramttkuna me GBS einkenni flensu “vertinni” (Innskot anda. Merkilegt hva margir f einmitt flensu egar blusetninga “vertin” er.. En vert var kalla uppgripstmi fiskivinnunni = miklir peningar sem vikomandi fkk = bluefnaframleiendur hr) eru lkur a fyrsta spurningin sem lknirinn spyr ig s hvort hafir nlega fengi flensu blusetningu. GBS er lka skr sem aukaverkun af flensu blusetningunni fylgiselinum.

ANDI AGN.


BANVNI SVEPPURINN -CANDIDA AURIS -VIDEO

ttinum dag tlum vi um httulega og banvna sveppaskingu, Candida Auris.
Sveppurinn er a koma fram sem aljleg gn,hefur breist t a minnsta kosti 15 lndum og krafist nokkur hundraa lfa.
Hann var greindur ri 2009 Japan, essi banvni sveppur smitar n sjklinga sjkrahsum og hjkrunarheimilum um allan heim.
Samkvmt Centers for Disease Control (CDC) sjdmsvarnar eftirlitinu, deyr um helmingur eirra sjklinga sem f sveppaskingun Candida Auris innan vi 90 daga.
Samt hafa vsindamenn ekki geta neglt a niur hvaan sveppurinn er upprunninn..
Af hverju er sveppurinn svo httulegur?
Hvaa lndin eru a sem hann er a breiast t ?
Og hverjir eru httu?
Vi skulum finna a t gegnum DEPTH.

In Depth: The Deadly Fungus - Candida Auris

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1465&v=0chD0ZsQNvU

The Virus That Kills Drug-Resistant Superbugs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVTOr7Nq2SM


BLUEFNI OG HNETU OFNMIS FARALDURINN - BLUEFNI ERU MEGIN ORSK FUOFNMIS!!!!

Table of Contents

– Dr Tim O’Shea

Hversvegna eru allir a kaupa EpiPens nna?

Fyrir aldamtin 1900 var hnetuofnmi ekkt. dag eru um 1.5 miljnir barna me a USA. Fari var a nota hnetuolu sem hjlparefni fyrir pensilln til innsptingar um 1940 og kringum 1960 er fari a nota hana sem hjlparefni bluefnaframleislu.

1953 var 12% jarinnar komi me pensiln ofnmi. En kostir ess mti lfshttulegum bakteru skingum tti httunnar viri.

1950 var sklalyfjum deilt t eins og M&M. Hermenn, brn, allir me einhverskonar veikindi, ekki bara bakteru.(Innskot anda-pensilln virkar ekki virusa)

rtt fyrir alvarlegar vivaranir Alexander Flemmings vi nota sklalyf sem fyrirbyggjandi, var eim deilt t hgri-vinstri, svona til vonar og vara, sem vru au ntt undralyf.

a er ekki fyrr en kringum 1950 sem hnetuofnmi fer a gera vart vi sig, jafnvel a Amerkanar hefu bora hnetur meira en heila ld. Muni- a bora hnetur getur ekki valdi hnetu ofnmi, nema r hafi n a mygla, en a er sem aflatoxins myndast, a er rauninni ekki hnetu ofnmi. egar fr a bera hnetu ofnmi voru tilfellin a f a a tti ekki ess viri a rannsaka a.

OFNMISLOST OG OFNMI

ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK AND ALLERGY

Fyrir aldamtin 1900, var ofnmislost nnast ekkt. Einkennin voru skyndilegt yfirli (Innskot Agny.Eins og hefur ske hj stlkum egar r eru blusettar me HPV bluefnunum), andnau, krampar og stundum daui, var ekki til fyrr en htt var a nota skurhnf og fari a blusetja undir h.

essarri umbreytingu var eiginlega loki um aldamtin hinum Vestrna heimi. Einmitt esum tma, byrjai nr sjkdmur sem kallaist Serum Sickness/ blvatns sjkdmur a hrj sundir barna. Margvsleg einkenni fylgdu blusetningunni oft, ar meal lost, yfirli, og stundum dausfll.

stainn fyrir a dylja a, var tengingin ekkt og skjalfest lknaskrslum ess tma. Dr. Clemens Von Pirquet, sem fann reyndar upp ori “ofnmi”, var leiandi rannsknum einkennum essa nju sjkdma. [5]

Serum Sickness/Blsjkdmurinn var fyrsta samansafn ofnmisvalda sgunnar. a sem hafi urft til a koma honum af sta var tilkoma sprautu nlarinnar. egar skurhnfnum var skift t fyrir nlina, sla 1800, var a algengt a Serum Sicknesss / blsjkdmurinn kmi brnum rmi. a var vita a etta vri afleiing blusetninga. Vissulega, hefur ofnmi ntmans rast fr fyrstu rannsknum Serum Sickness afleiingu bluefna.

BLUEFNA OFURNMI

VACCINE HYPERSENSITIVITY

Von Pirquet viurkenndi a bluefni hefi 2 aal hrif: nmi og ofurnmi[5]

Hann sagi a etta tvennt vri askiljanlegt: anna vri afleiing hins. Me rum orum, ef vi ttum a hafa vinning af hrifum fjl-nmisagera, yrum vi a stta okkur vi neikva ttinn-fjl ofurnmi sem nausynlegan hjlpartt.

Ntma lknisfri kva a essum tvfaldu hrifum yri haldi leyndum, annig a eir leyfa ekki a neikvi tturinn s rddur

Margir lknar voru byrjun 1900 algjrlega mti blusetningum vegna essa hrifa. Ekki var sanna a auglstur vinningur vri httunnar viri.

Lknar eins og Walter Hawden MD, Wm. Howard Hay og Alfred Russel Wallace su hvernig blusttar (smallpox) bluefni hafi reynd auki blusttar tilfellin. [2,3] Wallace var einn af leiandi faraldsfringum aldarinnar, og kort hans sem sndu a aukning dausfalla af vldum blusttar fr saman –eru nkvmar heimildir / metanlegar grunn heimildir.

Annar tmamta rannsakandi snemma 1900 var Dr. Charles Ricket, s sem kom me hugtaki “ braofnmi” [4]

Ricket einbeitti sr a vibrgum sem a sumt flk virtist sna gagnvart vissum futegundum.

Hann uppgtvai a sambandi vi fuofnmi komu vibrgin fram sem afleiing skertra (niurbrotinna) prteina funni, sem hefu fari gegnum meltingarkerfi og fundi sr annig lei inn bli gegnum leka armana. Framandi protein bli eru vitanlega kveikjan a llum ofnmis vibrgum, ekki bara hj flki, heldur llum drum. [6]

En Richet tk eftir v a verstu tilfellunum, skei bra fuofnmi ekki bara vi a bora mat. hefi a einfaldleg veri matareitrun.

Fuofnmis lost er allt annars elis.

essi skyndlegu ofsafengnu vibrg bera me sr a innspting hafi t sr sta, kjlfari er svo fa sem inniheldur a sama og innsptingin (blusetningin) innihlt… Fr blusetningu, sar er funnar neytt. Upphaflega agerin skapar ofnmi. Anna skifti er a hin rsargjrnu, jafnvel banvnu, lkamlegu vibrg.

Fyrstu verk Richets kringum 1900 voru aallega samband vi egg, kjt, mjlk og barnaveiki (diphtheria) protein. (Innskot anda- eftir a grska vel og vandlega barnaveiki-bluefnis -innihaldinu-en g tengi persnulega a sem allir f dag og kalla er barkablga sem afleiingu af barnaveiki blusetningu-.e. eir blusettu smita lka..Og ekki geta lknar kalla a barnaveiki srt a kafna vegna barkablgu-v a er j bi a blusetja okkur ll sem eru orin um 60 ra..og alla fdda eftir a)

Fljtlega fru arir lknar a taka eftir slandi lkum einkennum milli vibraga vi fu og blsjkdmsins sem tengdist bluefnum. Nkvmlega smu klnsku einkennin.

PENSILLN

PENICILLIN

Nst var a pensilln, sem var mjg vinslt runum milli 1940 og 1950. a uppgtvaist fljtt a aukaefni sem klluust “hjlparefni” vru nausynleg til a lengja virkni sklalyfsins egar v var sprauta lkamann. Hjlparefnin myndu virka sem burarsameindir. n hjlparefna myndi sklalyfi einungis virka um 2 klukkutma. Hreinsaar olur virkuu best, unnu sem tmalosunar hylki fyrir sklalyfin.

Jarhnetuola var fyrir valinu, vegna ess a hn virkai vel, var dr og auvelt a nlgast hana. Ofnmi fyrir pensillni var algengt, og var undireins ekkt sem vikvmni fyrir essari olu sem var notu sem burarefni. a er essvegna sem enn dag a ert spurur a v hvort hafir ofnmi fyrir pensillni. Ofnmi er vikvmni fyrir burarefninu. (peanut oil/jarhnetuou)

ri 1953 voru 12% jarinnar komin me ofnmi fyrir pensillni.[1]

http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/

a er fyrir WWII sem fyrst er skrt fr jarhnetu ofnmi mrgum rannsknum hj fullornum og brnum sem hfu veri sprautu me nja “undra lyfinu” penisilln.. essum tma voru vandri sambandi vi penisilln, ar sem virknin vari einungis nokkra klukkutma.

Til a lengja virkni lyfsins, blandai herlknirinn Dr. Monroe Romansky a me v sem fanlegt var strstma –hnetuolu og bflugnavaxi.

etta var einfld lausn-lkaminn myndi brjta niur oluna og losa hgt t blstrauminn.

v miur olli lausn Romanskys v a tugir barna og fullorinna var vikvmt fyrir hnetum. .[8]

Til a draga r essum aukaverkunum var hnetuolan hreinsu til a fjarlgja eins miki af prteininu og mgulegt var. Samkvmt FDA inniheldur samt sem ur "best hreinsaaa" hnetuolan snefil af hreinu prteini 0,014 til 16,7 μg prtein / ml olu. [9]

h hlutfallslegui ryggi penicillni, var hnetuola samykkt almenna notkun innan lyfjainaarins.

UPPGANGUR BLUEFNA

Stra breytingin kom me bluefnunum.

Hnetu ola var kynnt sem hjparefni bluefnum upp r 1960. a birtist grein NY Times 18.Sept.1964 sem hefi aldrei fengist prentu dag.

Hfundurinn lsti v hvernig ntt einkaleyfis innihaldsefni sem innihlt hnetuolu, vri btt vi sem hjlparefni ntt flensu bluefni, v skyni a lengja “nmi.”

JARHNETUOLA NOTU NJU BLUEFNI

PEANUT OIL USED IN A NEW VACCINE

http://www.nytimes.com/1964/09/19/peanut-oil-used-in-a-new-vaccine.html?_r=0

Jarhnetuolu aukaefni til a bta virkni flensu blusetningar.

Peanut Oil Additive Is Found to Improve Flu Shot's Potency http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9800E4DD1330E43BBC4952DFB767838D679EDE&legacy=true

NEW YORK Merck & Co. has altered its influenza vaccine in an attempt to extend the life of flu shots by two to three years.

The key new ingredient: Peanut oil./Jarhnetuola

Are Peanut Oil Proteins Still In Vaccines?

(ERU HNETU OLU PROTEIN ENN BLUEFNUM?)

http://blog.naturalhealthyconcepts.com/2015/03/17/the-origin-of-food-allergies-natural-ways-to-prevent-them/

1424458_162819887261560_829305886_n1.jpg

In 1964, an article published in the New York Times reported that Merck, a major pharmaceutical manufacturer, patented a peanut oil vaccine adjuvant that would extend immunity.

Merck’s Peanut Oil Adjuvant / MercksJarhnetuolu hjlparefni

http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/11/mercks-peanut-oil-adjuvant/

On September 19, 1964,an article titled “Peanut Oil Used In A New Vaccine” appeared in The New York Times.1It was written by Stacey V. Jones.The piece noted that an influenza vaccine, which had just recently been patented by Merck & Co., Inc., carried a key ingredient known as Adjuvant 65, which contained peanut oil. The adjuvant, aimed at slowly releasing antigens to “stimulate the creation of antibodies,” was described as “anemulsion of refined peanut oil in water to which are added an emulsifier and a stabilizer.”1

UPPRUNI FU OFNMIS & NTTRULEGAR AFERIR TIL A KOMA VEG FYRIR A

The Origin Of Food Allergies & Natural Ways To Prevent Them

http://blog.naturalhealthyconcepts.com/2015/03/17/the-origin-of-food-allergies-natural-ways-to-prevent-them/

Here are some of the excipients used in vaccines and the reasons for their use as defined by the CDC.

HR ERU UPPLSINGAR UM NOKKUR AF EIM EFNUM SEM ERU BLUEFNUM OG ETTA ER LISTI FR CDC -EIM SEM SEGJA MANNI A N S KOMINN ESSI EA HINN FARALDURINN.

cdc-additives-listing-vaccines-source-600.jpg

Ef vi skoum ll vandamlin sambandi vi bluefni susta ratug [2]

er yfirborskennd vitneskja ng til a a vakni grunsemdir um a bluefni spili einhvern tt essu ofnmi meal barna.

En vibrgin vi (jar)hnetum er ekki bara eitthva ofnmi.

http://www.offthegridnews.com/alternative-health/the-shocking-link-between-peanut-allergies-and-vaccines/

http://www.offthegridnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/peanutallergy.jpg

Hnetu ofnmi hefur skyndilega komi fram sem numer 1 sem daui af vldum matvla, er eim flokki ofnmisvaka sem geta orsaka braofnmi. etta stand eykur lkur astma kasti, losti, ndunarfra bilun, og jafnvel daua. Srstaklega meal barna.

Heimildir birtar Heather Fraser’s 2011 book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic/Hnetu Ofnmis Faraldurinn benda a bluefnin tengist essu vfengjanlega.

Vi hfum komist a v a viss flokkkur hjlparefna bluefnum , er mjg lklega orsakavaldurinn v sem mtti kalla faraldur. [1]

En frum aeins til baka. Vi verum a skoa nlina sgu bluefna og sklalyfja, og r lffrilegu breytingar sem innihaldsefni essum glnju lyfjum geta haft bli hj brnum.

ANDI AGN

P.S..Tk eftir a eg hafi ekki tt sm, svo g set a hr tt..i sar..

HNETU HJLPAREFNINU HALDI LEYNDU

KEEPING PEANUT ADJUVANTS A SECRET

http://www.march-against-monsanto.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/peanut-allergy-epidemic.jpg

The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines.

What is listed in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula. Same with the inserts.

Suddenly after 1973, that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers knew it must be protected. Intellectual property. So now they only were required to describe the formula in general.

Why was peanut allergy so violent?

Adjuvant pioneer Maurice Hilleman claimed peanut oil adjuvants had all protein removed by refining. [9]

The FDA disagreed. They said some peanut protein traces would always persist [10]- that even the most refined peanut oils still contained some traces of intact peanut proteins.

This was the reason doctors were directed to inject vaccines intramuscular rather than intravenous – a greater chance of absorption of intact proteins, less chance of reaction.

But all their secret research obviously wasn’t enough to prevent sensitivity.

Mother Nature know best: no intact proteins in the body. 60 million years of Natural Selection didn’t create the mammalian immune system for nothing. Put intact proteins, peanut or whatever, for any imagined reason into the human system and the inflammatory response will fire. And since the goal of oil emulsion adjuvants was to prolong reactivity in the first place – the notion of time-release – this led to sensitization.

HNETU -OFNMIS FARALDURINN

PEANUT ALLERGY EPIDEMIC

Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared.

HVA BREYTTIST?

What changed?

The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s:

1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines

It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed.

EN ETTA ER ENN VERRA.

But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body. In 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months.

A new kind of anaphylaxis appeared with peanut reactions:

reverse anaphylaxis. (p 172, [1])

The reaction was not only to the sensitizing antigen, but to the weird new antibodies that had just been introduced in the human species by the new antigen. Without the usual benefit of the evolutionary process.

As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of kids were now exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with frequent cases of anaphylaxis reactions, sometimes fatal.

EN ENGINN TALAI UM A..

But nobody talked about it.

Following the next enormous increase in vaccines on the Mandated Schedule after 9/11, whereby the total shot up to 68 recommended vaccines, the peanut allergy soon reached epidemic proportions: a million children: 1.5% of them.

These numbers fit the true definition of epidemic even though that word has never been used in mainstream literature with respect to peanut allergy, except in Fraser’s odd little book.

Many researchers, not just Heather Fraser, could see very clearly that

“The peanut allergy epidemic in children was precipitated by childhood injections.” ( [1], p 106)

Ending the peanut allergy epidemic by Heather Fraser

http://www.foodsmatter.com/allergy_intolerance/peanut_treenut/articles/ending-peanut-epidemic-09-15.html

But with the newfound research, the medical profession will do what they always must do – bury it. Protect the companies.

So no money will be ever allocated from NIH to study the obvious connection between vaccine excipients and peanut allergy.

That cannot happen, primarily because it would require a control group – an unvaccinated population. And that is the Unspoken Forbidden.

Same line of reasoning that has prevented Wakefield’s work from ever being replicated in a mainstream US clinical study. No unvaccinated populations. Which actually means no studies whose outcome could possibly implicate vaccines as a source of disease or immunosuppression.

BLUEFNI SEM ORSAKAVALDUR OFNMIS FARALDRA?

Vaccines as a cause of an allergy epidemic?

Impossible. Let’s definitely not study it.

Instead let’s spend the next 20 years looking for the Genetic Link to the childhood peanut allergy epidemic…

In such a flawed system, any pretense of true clinical science is revealed as fatally handicapped of course: we are looking for the truth, wherever our studies shall take us, except for this, and this, and oh yes, this.

Evidence for the connection between peanut excipients and vaccines is largely indirect today, because of the circling of the wagons by the manufacturers. It is very difficult to find peanut excipients listed in the inserts and PDR listings of vaccines. Simple liability.

FRAME OF REFERENCE

So in addition to all the other problems with vaccines delineated in our text, now we have a new one – peanut oil excipients. Which all by themselves can cause severe, even fatal, episodes of shock, as well as chronic allergy – irrespective of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, and the attenuated pathogens which the manufacturers do admit to.

Quite a toxic burden to saddle the unprotected newborn with. No wonder the US Supreme Court refers to vaccines as “unavoidably unsafe.”

Childhood allergies doubled between 1980 and 2000, and have doubled again since that time. [11] Theories abound. Childhood vaccines doubled at the same time. Why is there a virtual blackout of viable discussion about this glaring fact?

The epidemic of peanut allergy is just one facet of this much broader social phenomenon. We have the sickest, most allergic kids of any country, industrialized or not, on Earth.

A study of the standard literature of vaccines is identical to a study of the history of adjuvants – an exercise in cover-up and dissimulation. Unvaccinated children don’t become autistic.

And they don’t go into shock from eating peanuts. But there can never be a formal clinical study where the control group is unvaccinated. NIH would never do that. They cannot. They know the outcome.

HVA ER A VALDA HNETU OFNMI?

What Is Causing The Peanut Allergies?

http://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/what-is-causing-the-peanut-allergies/

So if they know the peanut oil often causes violent reactions, and causes lifelong peanut allergies in millions upon millions of people, why are they using it instead of a safer adjuvant? Now, let’s get it straight that all adjuvants can cause problems, because it’s not just peanuts that the western world have skyrocketing allergic reactions to, but yes, there are safer adjuvants, so why not use the best one?

The simple answer is money. Vaccinations are a multi-billion dollar industry, and so is it’s spin-off, the allergy treatment industry. In fact, in the next few years, it is projected to pass the $50 billion dollar per year mark.

Now imagine this … you own a big company selling vaccines and you discover a substance which you can add to your vaccines to cause a lifelong allergy to in your customers. This gives you an opportunity to sell them protection products for their allergy, including anti-histamines, epinephrine injectors, and peanut patches for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.

HEIMILDIR

References

  1. Fraser, H, The Peanut allergy epidemic, Skyhorse 2011
  2. O’Shea, T, Vaccination is not immunization, thedoctorwithin 2013
  3. Wallace, AR, Vaccine delusion, 1898
  4. Richet, C, Nobel lecture, acceptance speech, 11 Dec 1913
    Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967
    www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1913/richet-lecture.html
  5. Von Pirquet, C, MD, On the theory of infectious disease
    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 80, January 1987
  6. O’Shea, T, Allergies: the threshold of reactivity
    www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/Allergies-The-Threshold-of-Reactivity/
  7. O’Shea, T, The post antibiotic age
    www.thedoctorwithin.com/antibiotics/Post-Antibiotic-Age/
  8. Jones, S, Peanut oil used in a new vaccine New York Times 18 Sep 13
  9. HOBSON, D, MD, The potential role of immunological adjuvants
    in influenza vaccines Postgraduate Medical Journal March 1973 , no. 49, p 180.
    http://pmj.bmj.com/content/49/569/180.full.pdf
  10. Technical Report # 595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976.
    http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_595.pdf
  11. FDA: March 2006. Approaches to Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens
    www.fda.gov/downloads/food/labelingnutrition/foodallergenslabeling/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/ucm192048.pdf
  12. O’Shea, T, The threshold of reactivity
    www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/Allergies-The-Threshold-of-Reactivity/
  13. There are precedents recent and historical (seeThe Words Allergy and Anaphylaxis were Invented to Describe Vaccine-Injuries)for the causal link between vaccines and mass allergy.
    http://www.smartvax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73%3Avaccine-induced-allergies

  14. A Study of the Association of Vaccines with Food Allergies
  15. http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/table_of_contents.htm
  16. Peanut Oil Used in Vaccines Since the 1960s

    http://www.drpalevsky.com/articles_pages/346_Peanut_Oil_in_Vaccines_Since%20the_1960s.asp

    The Hidden Food Allergy That Causes Infertility

    http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/allergy/960-infertility.html

    How A Gluten Allergy Can Effect Your Fertility

    http://www.gettingpregnantnow.org/Articles/Celiac Disease And Infertility.html

    Gluten Allergy And Recurring Miscarriage .

    http://www.gettingpregnantnow.org/Articles/Gluten_Allergy_and_Getting_Pregnant.html

    One in Six or one in Seven couples

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5159380/Fertility-treatment-doubles-in-15-years.html

    Infertility affects about 6.1 million people in the U.S., equivalent to ten percent of the reproductive age population.

    http://www.psychologistanywhereanytime.com/adoption_psychologist_and_psychologists/psychologist_infertility.htm


    A Study of the Association of Vaccines with Food Allergies -
    This summarizes it all

    Allergy Background

    Another Nasty Side Effect from Vaccinations: A Lifetime Fear of Dying from Eating - This epidemic has hit our vaccinated children, so most of the general public is unaware of the severity of the problem and cannot understand what is going on.
    Background - I was puzzled about peanut allergiesBackground-2Physical Symptoms of Food Allergies from Stopping Inflammation by Dr. Nancy Appleton
    Physical Symptoms - Videos

    Food Allergy Studies

    Peanut allergies in Indonesia & Thailand Peanut allergies and IsraelDo clean houses cause peanut allergies?Sesame Allergies

    Causes

    Peanut allergy and infant formula and vitaminsAntibiotics and AllergiesAllergic Dogs and other Animals

    Food Allergy Statistics

    Deadly PeanutsHistory Timeline of Vaccines & Food AllergiesStatisticsAge Study Table Meaningless Statistics

    Injections Cause Allergies

    Can vaccines cause food allergies?Egg AllergiesAnaphylactic children—canaries in the public health mine shaft?Cases of Vaccinations Directly Causing AllergiesWhy is the aluminum in the vaccines? Is it as innocent as the doctors say? "Aluminum is everywhere in the environment. The little bit in the vaccine can't hurt you...."Eczema is food allergy

    It's in There!

    It's in there!Culture MediumEvery single food allergy that I have found, I have also found the food listed in a patent (except for squid... I'm still looking)DiluentWorld Health OrganizationGenerally Recognized as Safe Inactive" Ingredients in Pharmaceutical ProductsFDAOils listed as ingredients in adjuvants and vaccines from patents on-lineWhat about milk allergy? Is milk used in vaccines?"Currently, most if not all vaccines available on the market today contain mineral oil as part of the adjuvant oil phase."Patents for vaccine ingredients such as adjuvants and mediumsPatents Pure peanut oilShellfish AllergyUS Licensed Vaccines (as of July 31, 2008) [I added last column - bfg]

    Experts

    CDC.Dr. Harry Hong, PhD, offers expertise on how to prevent children from dangerous allergies.eMJA The Medical Journal of AustraliaFood Allergies for Dummies FAANThe Complete Idiot's Guide to Food Allergies by Lee H. Freude, M.D., and Jeanne Rejaunier, Penguin Group Proof from the Experts!SichererDoublespeakDelayed-type hypersensitivity reaction due to vaccinationsWould you rather be a dummy or an idiot?

    Secret Ingredients

    Secret IngredientsRight to Know & Labeling package inserts

    Food Allergy Cures?

    A Vaccine to Cure Allergies?!?Peanut Allergy Cures?Service dog for the allergic

    Conclusion

    Vaccines are the direct cause for the deadly peanut allergy!!! Vaccine allergyStill don't get how vaccinations can cause peanut allergies??Save the Goober!

    Other Health Problems due to Food allergies

    Infertility and Food AllergyMental Health and Food AllergiesDeaths from Food allergies

    It's No Secret Now - Updates

    Updates - Medical community admits that vaccines cause allergies but downplays it. Public needs to wake their doctors up!
    Hypersensitivity Reaction to Vaccine Components - from Medscape - very clear that vaccines cause allergies to vaccine ingredients
    Wyeth Memo - memo made public. Pharmaceutical companies spread the distribution of batches of vaccines out over a wide geographical area so the public and doctors cannot connect the occurance of death or illness to a specific vaccine batch.

    Vaccine Ingredient Lists and allergies

    Vitamin Shots

    Vitamin Shots for Newborn - peanut oil is in the vitamin K shot and it causes food allergies

    Vaccinations are the MAIN CAUSE of Food Allergies!!

    NewsTarget:"The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective,"


MISLINGAR OG KGHSTI AF VLDUM BLUEFNSINS SJLFS!!

educatebefore_you_vaccinate.jpgVaccines Are Causing Measles.
BLUEFNI ERU A ORSAKA MISLINGA (KGHSTA EINNIG)

BARN SEM FKK MISLINGA AF VLDUM BLUEFNISINS SJLFS VAR A SMITA ARA ME LIFANDI MISLINGA VRUS SEM VAR HLSI OG VAGI ESS.(BARNSINS)

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/26/more-vaccine-failures-measlesmmr-vaccines-cause-measles-child-who-caught-measles-from-vaccine-was-shedding-live-vaccine-measles-virus-in-throat-and-urine/

So when someone makes the accusation, send them the link to this CHS post:

http://wp.me/pfSi7-2an

essar upplsingar koma fr CDCs eigin vikulegum skrslum MMWR

Morbidity and Mortality /Sjkdms stand og dnartni.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/index.html

MISLINGAR RAKTIR FYRSTA SKIFTI TIL EINSTAKLINGS SEM VAR A FULLU BLUSETTUR! Nsikan AkpanApr. 11, 2014 ,12:00 PM

Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/04/measles-outbreak-traced-fully-vaccinated-patient-first-time

Measles Outbreak among Vaccinated High School Students -Illinois

MISLINGAR BRJTAST T MEAL BLUSETTRA NEMENDA ILLINOIS

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00000359.htm

Hr eru 2 dmi sem sna a sem vi hfum alltaf vita, en a er a brn geta fengi mislinga fr MMR bluefninu sjlfu!

Fyrra tilfelli er fr Illinois, ar sem 17 framhaldsskla nemendur fengu mislinga jafnvel a 99% framhaldssklans hefu fengi MMR bluefni.

(Sem s aeins 1% sem ekki voru a fullu blusett!...)

Seinna tilfelli er nstum a sama. a tti sr sta Corpus Christi Texas framhaldssklanum ar em 14 nemendur fengu mislinga eftir a 99% af nemendum hfu veri blusettir me MMR.

ATHUGASEMD RITSJRNAR:

essi faraldur snir a smitun mislingum getur tt sr sta meal ba sklans sem eru skrir me 100% blusetningar -sem s a fullu blusettir.

etta stig var stafest mean rannskn faraldursins st.

New England Journal of Medicine. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198703263161303

Measles Outbreak in a Fully Immunized Secondary-School Population

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198703263161303

An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.

Vori 1985 brutust mislingar t meal unglinga Corpus Christi Texas, jafnvel a a blusetningar krfum hefi veri fullngt sklanum.

US MMR Measles Vaccine Failing – Vaccinated New Yorker Causes Measles Outbreak In Other Vaccinated New Yorkers – Not Caused By UnvaccinatedChildren

https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/12/us-mmr-measles-vaccine-failing-vaccinated-new-yorker-causes-measles-outbreak-in-other-vaccinated-new-yorkers-not-an-unvaccinated-child/

Measles Outbreak Traced to Fully Vaccinated Patient for First Time

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/04/measles-outbreak-traced-fully-vaccinated-patient-first-time

sambandi vi mislinga ogkghsta ..

Sumir vsindamenn vilja meina a a bluefni su bin a stkkbreyta hinum"gamla"sjkdm, ar af leiandi eru blusett brn a greinast me sjkdminn..

N su komnir til sgunnar vrusar sem ekkert bluefni vinnur ..!!!

a er ekki bara mislingar sem eru a koma upp a fullu blusettum einstaklingum- einnig kghsti...

Hvernig var a me sklalyfin?

Ofnotkun eim er sg vera orsakvaldur a bakterum sem ekkert vinnur "super bug"...

Sklalyfin hafa valdi stkkbreytingu bakterum..

RANNSKN:Kghsta faraldur tengdur vi blusett brn.

Study: Whooping cough outbreak linked to vaccinated children

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323187

Why whooping cough's making a comeback

HVERSVEGNA KGHSTI ER A KOMA AFTUR?

a ltur t fyrir a stan s uppfrsla yfir nja tegund af bluefni s um akenna.

Now it seems an upgrade to a new type of vaccine may be to blame.

https://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/02/whooping-cough-evolves-to-esca.html

US MMR Measles Vaccine Failing – Vaccinated New Yorker Causes Measles Outbreak In Other Vaccinated New Yorkers –

Not Caused By UnvaccinatedChildren
EKKI ORSAKAР AF BLUSETTUM BRNUM! https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2014/04/12/us-mmr-measles-vaccine-failing-vaccinated-new-yorker-causes-measles-outbreak-in-other-vaccinated-new-yorkers-not-an-unvaccinated-child/

Study: Whooping cough outbreak linked to vaccinated children

Rannskn: Kghsta tilfelli tengd vi blusett brn

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323187#ixzz5XsXkHdbL

Whooping cough vaccine ‘should be replaced’

"A TTI AР SKIFTA UM KGHSTA BLUEFNI"

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/323187

Up until 1997, a"whole-cell"vaccine was used before it was phased out over two years because ofconcerns about side effects.

anga til 1997 var"heil-frumu" bluefni nota art til v var skift t fyrir 2 rum, vegna hyggna um aukaverkanirnar " Since 1999, a new "acellular" vaccine has been used.

SAN 1999, HEFUR NTT "FRUMUSKIFT" BLUEFNI VERI NOTA

One of the authors of the study, Ruiting Lan,toldThe Advertiserof Adelaide,South Australia:

"A key issue is that the whole-cell vaccine contained hundreds of antigens, which gave broad protection against many strains of pertussis.

But the acellular vaccine contains only three to five antigens. Our findings suggest that the use of the acellular vaccine may be one factor contributing to these genetic changes."

To confirm their suspicions, the researchers also analysed particular genes in the bacteria DNA that make the three to five antigens which interact with the new vaccine.

"The new strains have a new copy of the gene and so will make a slightly different antigen,"said Lan, whichmeans the mutated strains are unlikely to react to an immune response arising from the vaccine.

"Lykilatrii er a heil-frumu bluefni innihlt hundruir mtefnavaka, sem gaf breivirkari vernd gegn mrgum afbrigum af kghsta. En frumulausa bluefni inniheldur einungis 3-5 mtefnavaka.

Uppgtvanir okkar gefa til kynna a notkun frumulausa bluefnisins geti veri orsakavaldurinn essum gena (innan litnings) breytingum ."

Til ess a stafesta grunsemdir snar, efnagreindu rannsakendurnir einnig tiltekin gen (innan litnings) DNA bakterunnar sem myndar 3 af 5 mtefnavkum sem mynda vxilverkun vi nja bluefni.

" Nja afbrigi sem hefur nja afritun arfberanum (venjulega innan litnings) og mun essvegna ba til ltillega breyttan mtefnisvaka," annig a a er ekki lklegt a stkkbreytta afbrigi bregist vi me nmis svrun fr bluefninu.

BLUEFNIN -orsaka ann sjkdm sem au ttu a koma veg fyrir

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1298735/

The Vaccines That Worry Parents Most

BLUEFNI SEM VELDUR FORELDRUM MESTUM HYGGJUM.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/03/27/vaccines-that-worry-parents-most.aspx

Pro & Con Arguments:

"Should any vaccines be required for children?"

http://vaccines.procon.org/

Vi ekkjum ll einhverja sem fengu flensusprautu og fengu flensuna, er llu jafna sagt vi flk a a hafi veri blusett of seint. Vikomandi hafi veri kominn me flensuna egar hann blusettur, ea a bluefnin virki n alls ekki eins alla...

Ea einhvern sem var blusettur vi hettustt (Mumps) og fkk svo hettustt svo a lknarnir kalli a hettusttar “eftirlkingu.”
a sem blusetningar ferli gegnur t , er hrfnt jafnvgi milli ess a f sjkdminn ea verjast honum.

Ef vi skoum httu /versus vinning, er vinningurinn ekki hr fyrir blefnin, v a vi erum a htta nmiskerfi okkar fyrir einn meinlausan sjkdm, en bja httunni heim fyrir v a f annan sjkdm sem er venjulega miklu verri sjkdmur. essi skifti eru ekki g.

egar bluefnin eru a orsaka ann sjkdm sem au ttu a hafa komi veg fyrir, er nafninu sjkdmnum oft breytt,til ess a vernda bluefni...(ekki barni ea ig!...)

Eftir allt.. hvernig getur einhver virkilega veri a f ann sjkdm sem var bi a blusetja vikomandi gegn (ea “me”, g ver ringlaur/u..)

a er a tla a bluefni su jafnt (=) nmi, sem au eru ekki!
Ef a barn fr sjkdm eftir a vera blusett, tla lknarnir a a geti ekki veri sjkdmurinn sem barni var blusett gegn.

Vi heyrum iulega umsagnir um sjkdma sem eru kallair:

“ mislinga-brir,” “hettusttar-eftirlking,” “ annars flokks – mislingar,” ea “afbrigilegir mislingar,”og “afbrigileg hettustt”.

Ea eir hafa breytt nafninu algjrlega rinfantile paralysis (ungbarna lmun)aseptic menengitis("dauhreinsu "heilahimnublga) eru einkennin eftir sem ur au smu.

Ea sjkdmurinn eigi almennt a vera -upplei –eftir a bi er a blusetja.

a eigi sko ekkert samband a vera ar milli..bara"tilviljun" .

Storsaeter et alSvj (1988) skri fr v a

“ fjgur blusett brn ltust ”

eftir a hafa fengicellular pertussis(frumu kghsta) bluefni, egar “ eitt dausfall var tla eim hp barna sem blusett voru”!

a er merkilegt a lknar skuli tla a eitt barn muni deyja af vldum bluefnisins, en halda v samt um lei fram a bluefni su httulaus!!

(Innskot anda-kghsta bluefni inniheldur efni sem nota er til a framkalla heilablgu hj tilraunadrum rannsknarstofum!)

eir lknar sem eru fylgjandi blusetningum skirrast einskis vi a kalla sjkdma orsakaa af blusetningum njum nfnum..

eir munu sverja a bluefni hafi ekki valdi vandamlinu, a s sko einungis"tilviljun"!

eir nota heiti sem hljma eins og raunverulegur sjkdmur:

eins ogt.d.BCG-itis,Atypical Mumps, Measels like disorder, Atypical Measels.

Allt verur etta til a flkja mli enn meir, vegna ess a sjklingurinn (foreldrarnir) vita a einkennin eru nkvmlega au smu hverjum sjkdm, hvort sem hann orsakast af bluefninu ea nttrulegu veirunni.

En fyrir rkrtt hugsandi manneskju, er veiran bluefninu, og mrgum tilfelluminniheldurbluefni lifandi veiru, ekki daua ea breytta nokkur htt, t.d. mislingaveiru bluefni.

Svo er mli flkt enn meir me nafnabreytingum, sem jna engum tilgangi n lta sjkdminn hverfa.

a verur a fara a skoa samhengi milli bluefna og sjkdma, frnalambanna/sjklinganna vegna..

egar llu er botninn hvolft.. komu j essir einstaklinar til lknisins eim tilgangi a last betri heilsu..ekki satt ?!!

andi Agn.

Proof That Vaccines Didnt Save Us

http://genesgreenbook.com/content/proof-vaccines-didnt-save-us

Vaccines Give Only Partial, Temporary Immunity, MakeYour Bodys Defenses Weaker Overall

http://genesgreenbook.com/content/vaccines-give-only-partial-temporary-immunity-make-your-bodys-defenses-weaker-overall

HVERNIG STENDUR V͠ AР EKKI ER TIL FYLGISEILL SLENSKU MEР BLUEFNUM EINS OG FYLGIR MEР RUM LYFJUM?

Bluefni eru skr sem lyf inni Lyfjastofnun slands.

Er ekki skylda a llum lyfjum fylgi upplsingar slensku um ll innihaldsefni-virk sem virk (uppfyllingarefni), aukaverkanir- vgar sem og alvarlegar- sem eru tilteknu lyfi?

Hvernig stendur v a bluefni virast vera einu lyfin sem er gjrsamlega haldi utan vi etta ferli?

Foreldrar /forramenn f engar upplsingar um etta hvorki fyrir ea eftir a blusett er -..

a er ekkert fali fr framleianda bluefnanna hva er eim - annig..

Hversvegna finnst Lyfjastofnun engin rf v a upplsingar fr framleiendum bluefna?

Erum vi slendingar a f einhverja sr tbna bluefna kokteila einhverju tsluveri?

stainn fyrir a borga x ha upph borgar rki x lga upph -gegn v a leyfa a brnin-aldrair-flk me undirliggjandi sjkdma/krnska s raun tilrauna kannur? slenska jin er j s sem er kjsanlegust til ess, me ttarskr aftur til 800...

a var j stan fyrir v a "gena" Kri vildi safna llu okkar DNA og afka ....(DeCode = afkun)...til a finna"ttar"sjkdma og ja ..svo hgt vri a ba til lyf vi eim og"lkna"okkur......Huge business - !!!...Fylgi peningaslinni!

g spuri lknir a v hversvegna landlknir hefi haft fyrir v a a margra sna pdf skjal umGardasil-HPV bluefni sem var svo ekki nota heldurCervarix- og engar upplsingar voru til um a slensku-

Mr var bent a fara inn Lyfjastofnun Evrpu sambandsinsog ar tti a vera fellilisti fyrir sland um a bluefni- sem g fann engan veginn hvernig sem g leitai..

En lknirinn svarai mr til a a vriLyfjastofnun slandssem kvi hva tti a a- ekki Landlknisembtti.!!!..

Er ekki Lyfjastofnun svona okkar slenskaFDA(fu og lyfjaeftirlit)...?

Sem a vera okkur almenningi til varnar og upplsinga um a ekki s veri a setja marka lyf og efni tlu til matvla/ drykkjar/inntku/innsptingar notkunar sem skaa okkar heilsu?

En v miur virist sem FDA (fu og lyfjaeftirlits stofnun Amerku) beri einungis hag lyfjarisanna dag egar skou eru lyf/efni sem eir hafa hleypt gegn en uru svo a innkalla 5 rum sar eins og var me lyfi Vioxx-en a urftu reyndar 27.000 manns a ltast ur en eir tku a loks af markai..2 rum eftir a a lyf var markasett var vita a a ylli hjartafllum!

Eigum vi a tla a "Lyfjastofnun" (Lyfjastofnun = stofnun fyrir lyf cool.) s eins og "brir " eirra Amerkunni? Ja..ekki ykir mr a lklegt v flest virumst vi slendingar apa eftir kananum og v miur fst af v gott ea til fyrirmyndar..

En hva sem v lur- Foreldrar/astandendur /forramenn barna ttu a gerast eigin rannsakendur og kynna sr bluefni ur en fari er a blusetja!

Ea kynna foreldrar sr ekki hvaa barna blstll er ruggastur? Kannar r hvaa efnum hann er r. Hvort su x eiturefni notu vi framleisluna..

Og velur a kaupa ann ruggasta og me minnstu slysahttuna ea httu fyrir v a barni skaist af vldum hans..

Afhverju kynna foreldrar/forramenn barna sr ekki bluefni jafn vel og me kaup blstl?

HVERSVEGNA VIRIST FORELDRUM EKKI FINNAST NEITT ATHUGAVERT VI A INN BARN EIRRA S DLT ALLSKYNS KEMSKUM EFNUM?

MRG SEM ERU TAUGAEITUR ERU AR MEAL !

EINHVERRA HLUTA VEGNA VIRIST SEM FLK FYLGI BLUSETNINGAR TRARSFNAAR HPNUM EFTIR, SEM HVER ANNAR STAURBLINDUR SAUUR...

LTA HVORKI TIL HGRI EA VINSTRI "BLUSETNINGAR" LEIINNI ..

TRA LKNA" BIBLUNNI" BKSTAFLEGA- JA REYNDAR TTI S "BIBLA " A HEITA " BIG PHARMA BIBLE" EN A ER S BK SEM LKNAR LRA AF ..

EFTIR ALLT.. ERU ALLIR LKNA HSKLAR STYRKTIR AF LYFJARISUNUM -X UPPHIR RLEGA..!

HUNDURINN BTUR EKKI HENDINA SEM GEFUR HONUM KJTBITANN-NEMA AF GRGI..

07adco_450.jpgLKNAR AUGLSTU SGARETTU REYKINGAR OG MLTU ME JAFN VEL OG SKILVIRKT FYRIR 70 RUM SAN OG STARFSBRUR EIRRA GERA DAG SAMBANDI VI BLUSETNINGAR!
A ER BARA BI A SKIFTA SGARETTUNNI SEM LKNIRINN HLT , T FYRIR SPRAUTUNA.. !
EIR SGU A REYKINGAR YLLU EKKI KRABBAMEINI-EKKI ASTMA-EKKI LUNGNAEMBU..
JAFNVEL TTU A LKNA ASTMA MINNIR MIG A G HAFI LESI EINHVERSSTAAR..!
07adco3_450.jpgN-EA VERJA IG SRINDUM HLSI...haha
HVERNIG MAUR SVO A GETA
TRA ESSU LII SEM KALLAR SIG "DOKTOR"??!!07adco2_450_1296398.jpg

Nsta sa

Nota bene

Translate your website into 52 languages

We The People Will Not Be Chipped!

NO VERICHIP INSIDE ME! I WILL NOT BE MARKED AS I WERE A BEAST!

We The People Will Not Be Chipped!
http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/main/news.php
We The People Will Not Be Chipped!

Höfundur

Agný
Agný

Betra er að vita "lítið" en um "mikið", frekar en að vita mikið um lítið... 

agnyrose@gmail.com

CHEMTRAILS OR?/EFNARÁKIR EÐA?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/32781077@N02/show/

Chemtrail-Related Illnesses  SJÚKDÓMSEINKENNI TENGD EFNARÁKUM

http://globalskywatch.com 

"Better to know little about a lot..than lot about one thing"

"Betra að vita lítið en um mikið...heldur en mikið um lítið.. "

Njustu myndir

  • Inga-2
  • Inga-2
  • ...19_131709-1
  • 0000386357 100.png
  • ...5_n_1321165

Njustu myndbndin

Bólusetningarþvingun

JFK  /  BUSH

Capitalist_Conspriracy

911  A  CLOSER  LOOK

THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001: Prof. Paul Zarembka

Innskrning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveiki Javascript til a hefja innskrningu.

Hafu samband