BÓLUEFNI OG HNETU OFNÆMIS FARALDURINN - BÓLUEFNI ERU MEGIN ORSÖK FÆÐUOFNÆMIS!!!!

Table of Contents

- VACCINES & PEANUT PANDEMIC

 

BÓLUEFNI ERU MEGIN ORSÖK FÆÐUOFNÆMIS!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/allergies.htm

 

http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/vaccines-and-the-peanut-allergy-epidemic/

– Dr Tim O’Shea

Hversvegna eru allir að kaupa EpiPens núna?

Fyrir aldamótin 1900 var hnetuofnæmi óþekkt. Í dag eru um 1.5 miljónir barna með það í USA. Farið var að nota hnetuolíu sem hjálparefni fyrir pensillín til innspýtingar um 1940 og í kringum 1960 er farið að nota hana sem hjálparefni í bóluefnaframleiðslu.

1953 var 12% þjóðarinnar komið með pensilín ofnæmi. En kostir þess á móti lífshættulegum bakteríu sýkingum þótti áhættunnar virði.

1950 var sýklalyfjum deilt út eins og M&M. Hermenn, börn, allir með einhverskonar veikindi, ekki bara bakteríu.(Innskot þýðanda-pensillín virkar ekki á virusa) 

Þrátt fyrir alvarlegar viðvaranir Alexander Flemming´s við nota sýklalyf sem fyrirbyggjandi, var þeim deilt út hægri-vinstri, svona til vonar og vara, sem væru þau nýtt undralyf.

Það er ekki fyrr en í kringum 1950 sem hnetuofnæmi fer að gera vart við sig, jafnvel þó að Ameríkanar hefðu borðað hnetur í meira en heila öld. Munið- að borða hnetur getur ekki valdið hnetu ofnæmi, nema þær hafi náð að mygla, en það er þá sem aflatoxins myndast, það er í rauninni ekki hnetu ofnæmi. Þegar fór að bera á hnetu ofnæmi voru tilfellin það fá að það þótti ekki þess virði að rannsaka það.

OFNÆMISLOST OG OFNÆMI

ANAPHYLACTIC SHOCK AND ALLERGY

Fyrir aldamótin 1900, var ofnæmislost nánast óþekkt. Einkennin voru skyndilegt yfirlið (Innskot Agny.Eins og hefur skeð hjá stúlkum þegar þær eru bólusettar með HPV bóluefnunum), andnauð, krampar og stundum dauði, var ekki til fyrr en hætt var að nota skurðhníf og farið að  bólusetja undir húð.

Þessarri umbreytingu var eiginlega lokið um aldamótin í hinum Vestræna heimi. Einmitt á þesum tíma, byrjaði nýr sjúkdómur sem kallaðist Serum Sickness/ blóðvatns sjúkdómur að hrjá þúsundir barna. Margvísleg einkenni fylgdu bólusetningunni oft, þar á meðal lost, yfirlið, og stundum dauðsföll.

Í staðinn fyrir að  dylja það, þá var tengingin þekkt  og skjalfest í læknaskýrslum þess tíma. Dr. Clemens Von Pirquet, sem fann reyndar upp orðið “ofnæmi”, var leiðandi í rannsóknum á  einkennum þessa nýju sjúkdóma. [5]

Serum Sickness/Blóðsjúkdómurinn  var fyrsta samansafn ofnæmisvalda  sögunnar. Það sem hafði þurft til að koma honum af stað var tilkoma sprautu nálarinnar.  Þegar skurðhnífnum var skift út fyrir nálina, síðla 1800, varð það algengt að Serum Sicknesss / blóðsjúkdómurinn  kæmi börnum í rúmið. Það var vitað að þetta væri afleiðing bólusetninga. Vissulega, hefur ofnæmi nútímans þróast frá fyrstu rannsóknum á Serum Sickness afleiðingu bóluefna.

BÓLUEFNA OFURNÆMI

VACCINE HYPERSENSITIVITY

Von Pirquet viðurkenndi að bóluefni hefði 2 aðal áhrif: ónæmi og ofurnæmi[5]

Hann sagði að þetta tvennt væri óaðskiljanlegt: annað væri afleiðing  hins.  Með öðrum orðum, ef við áttum að hafa ávinning af áhrifum fjöl-ónæmisaðgerða, yrðum við að sætta okkur við neikvæða þáttinn-fjöl ofurnæmi sem nauðsynlegan hjálparþátt.

Nútíma læknisfræði ákvað að þessum tvöfaldu áhrifum  yrði haldið leyndum, þannig að þeir leyfa ekki að neikvæði þátturinn sé ræddur

Margir læknar voru í byrjun 1900 algjörlega á móti bólusetningum vegna þessa áhrifa. Ekki var sannað að auglýstur ávinningur væri áhættunnar virði.

Læknar eins og Walter Hawden MD, Wm. Howard Hay og Alfred Russel Wallace sáu hvernig bólusóttar (smallpox) bóluefnið hafði í reynd aukið bólusóttar  tilfellin. [2,3]  Wallace var einn af leiðandi faraldsfræðingum aldarinnar, og kort hans sem sýndu að aukning dauðsfalla af völdum bólusóttar fór saman –eru nákvæmar heimildir / ómetanlegar grunn heimildir.

Annar tímamóta rannsakandi snemma 1900 var Dr. Charles Ricket, sá sem kom með hugtakið “ bráðaofnæmi”  [4]  

Ricket einbeitti sér að viðbrögðum sem að sumt fólk virtist sýna gagnvart vissum fæðutegundum.

Hann uppgötvaði að í sambandi við fæðuofnæmi komu viðbrögðin fram sem afleiðing óskertra (óniðurbrotinna) próteina í fæðunni, sem hefðu farið gegnum meltingarkerfið og fundið sér þannig leið inn í blóðið í gegnum  leka þarmana. Framandi protein í blóði eru vitanlega kveikjan að öllum ofnæmis viðbrögðum, ekki bara hjá fólki, heldur öllum dýrum. [6]

En Richet tók eftir því að í verstu tilfellunum, þá skeði bráða fæðuofnæmi ekki bara við að borða mat. Þá hefði það einfaldleg verið matareitrun.

Fæðuofnæmis lost er allt annars eðlis.

Þessi skyndlegu ofsafengnu viðbrögð bera með sér að innspýting hafi át sér stað, í kjölfarið er svo fæða sem inniheldur það sama og innspýtingin (bólusetningin) innihélt… Færð bólusetningu, síðar er fæðunnar neytt. Upphaflega aðgerðin skapar ofnæmi. Annað skiftið er það hin árásargjörnu, jafnvel banvænu, líkamlegu viðbrögð.

Fyrstu verk Richet´s í kringum 1900 voru aðallega í samband við egg, kjöt, mjólk og barnaveiki (diphtheria) protein. (Innskot þýðanda- Á eftir að grúska vel og vandlega í barnaveiki-bóluefnis -innihaldinu-en ég tengi persónulega það sem allir fá í dag og kallað er barkabólga sem afleiðingu af barnaveiki bólusetningu-þ.e. þeir bólusettu smita líka..Og ekki geta læknar kallað það barnaveiki þó þú sért að kafna vegna barkabólgu-því það er jú búið að bólusetja okkur öll sem eru orðin um 60 ára..og alla fædda eftir það)

Fljótlega fóru aðrir læknar að taka eftir sláandi líkum einkennum milli viðbragða við fæðu og blóðsjúkdómsins sem tengdist bóluefnum. Nákvæmlega sömu klínísku einkennin.

PENSILLÍN

PENICILLIN

Næst var það pensillín, sem varð mjög vinsælt á árunum á milli 1940 og 1950. Það uppgötvaðist fljótt að aukaefni sem kölluðust “hjálparefni” væru nauðsynleg til að lengja virkni sýklalyfsins þegar því var sprautað í líkamann.  Hjálparefnin myndu virka sem burðarsameindir. Án hjálparefna myndi sýklalyfið einungis virka í um 2 klukkutíma. Hreinsaðar olíur virkuðu best, unnu sem tímalosunar hylki fyrir sýklalyfin.

Jarðhnetuolía varð fyrir valinu, vegna þess að hún virkaði vel, var ódýr og auðvelt að nálgast hana. Ofnæmi fyrir pensillíni varð algengt, og var undireins þekkt sem viðkvæmni fyrir þessari olíu sem  var notuð sem burðarefni.  Það er þessvegna sem enn í dag að  þú ert spurður að því hvort þú hafir ofnæmi fyrir pensillíni. Ofnæmið er viðkvæmni fyrir burðarefninu. (peanut oil/jarðhnetuoíu)

Árið 1953 voru 12% þjóðarinnar komin með ofnæmi fyrir pensillíni.[1]

http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/

Það er fyrir WWII sem fyrst er skýrt frá jarðhnetu ofnæmi í mörgum rannsóknum hjá fullorðnum og börnum sem höfðu verið sprautuð með nýja “undra lyfinu” penisillín.. Á þessum tíma voru vandræði í sambandi við penisillín,  þar  sem virknin varði einungis í  nokkra klukkutíma.

Til að lengja virkni lyfsins, blandaði herlæknirinn Dr. Monroe Romansky það með því sem fáanlegt  var  á stríðstíma –hnetuolíu og býflugnavaxi.

Þetta var einföld lausn-líkaminn myndi brjóta niður olíuna og losa hægt út í blóðstrauminn.

Því miður olli lausn Romansky´s því að tugir  barna og fullorðinna varð viðkvæmt fyrir hnetum. .[8]

Til að draga úr þessum aukaverkunum var hnetuolían hreinsuð til að fjarlægja eins mikið af próteininu og mögulegt var. Samkvæmt FDA inniheldur samt sem áður "best hreinsaðaða" hnetuolían snefil af hreinu próteini 0,014 til 16,7 μg prótein / ml olíu. [9]

Óháð hlutfallslegui öryggi í penicillíni, var hnetuolía samþykkt í almenna notkun innan lyfjaiðnaðarins.

UPPGANGUR BÓLUEFNA

Stóra breytingin kom með bóluefnunum.

Hnetu olía var kynnt sem hjáparefni í bóluefnum upp úr 1960. Það birtist grein í NY Times 18.Sept.1964 sem hefði aldrei fengist  prentuð í dag.

Höfundurinn lýsti því hvernig nýtt einkaleyfis innihaldsefni sem innihélt hnetuolíu, væri bætt við sem hjálparefni í nýtt flensu bóluefni, í því skyni að lengja “ónæmi.”

JARÐHNETUOLÍA NOTUÐ Í NÝJU BÓLUEFNI

PEANUT OIL USED IN A NEW VACCINE

STACY V. JONES; Special to The New York Times SEPT. 19, 1964

http://www.nytimes.com/1964/09/19/peanut-oil-used-in-a-new-vaccine.html?_r=0

Jarðhnetuolíu aukaefni til að bæta virkni flensu bólusetningar.

Peanut Oil Additive Is Found to Improve Flu Shot's Potency http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9800E4DD1330E43BBC4952DFB767838D679EDE&legacy=true

NEW YORK Merck & Co. has altered its influenza vaccine in an attempt to extend the life of flu shots by two to three years.

The key new ingredient: Peanut oil./Jarðhnetuolía

Are Peanut Oil Proteins Still In Vaccines?

(ERU HNETU OLÍU PROTEIN ENNÞÁ Í BÓLUEFNUM?)

http://blog.naturalhealthyconcepts.com/2015/03/17/the-origin-of-food-allergies-natural-ways-to-prevent-them/

 

In 1964, an article published in the New York Times reported that Merck, a major pharmaceutical manufacturer, patented a peanut oil vaccine adjuvant that would extend immunity.

 

Merck’s Peanut Oil Adjuvant / Merck´sJarðhnetuolíu hjálparefni

http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2015/11/mercks-peanut-oil-adjuvant/

On September 19, 1964, an article titled “Peanut Oil Used In A New Vaccine” appeared in The New York Times.¹ It was written by Stacey V. Jones.  The piece noted that an influenza vaccine, which had just recently been patented by Merck & Co., Inc., carried a key ingredient known as Adjuvant 65, which contained peanut oil. The adjuvant, aimed at slowly releasing antigens to “stimulate the creation of antibodies,” was described as “an emulsion of refined peanut oil in water to which are added an emulsifier and a stabilizer.”¹ 

^{UPPRUNI FÆÐU OFNÆMIS & NÁTTÚRULEGAR AÐFERÐIR TIL AÐ KOMA Í VEG FYRIR ÞAÐ}

The Origin Of Food Allergies & Natural Ways To Prevent Them

http://blog.naturalhealthyconcepts.com/2015/03/17/the-origin-of-food-allergies-natural-ways-to-prevent-them/

Here are some of the excipients used in vaccines and the reasons for their use as defined by the CDC.

HÉR ERU UPPLÝSINGAR UM NOKKUR AF ÞEIM EFNUM SEM ERU Í BÓLUEFNUM OG ÞETTA ER LISTI FRÁ CDC -ÞEIM SEM SEGJA MANNI AÐ NÚ SÉ KOMINN ÞESSI EÐA HINN FARALDURINN.

Ef við skoðum öll vandamálin í sambandi við bóluefni síðusta áratug [2] 

þá er yfirborðskennd vitneskja nóg til að það vakni grunsemdir um að bóluefni spili einhvern þátt í þessu ofnæmi á meðal barna.

En viðbrögðin við (jarð)hnetum er ekki bara eitthvað ofnæmi.

 

http://www.offthegridnews.com/alternative-health/the-shocking-link-between-peanut-allergies-and-vaccines/

 

 Hnetu ofnæmi hefur skyndilega komið fram sem numer 1 sem dauði af völdum matvæla, er í þeim flokki ofnæmisvaka  sem geta orsakað bráðaofnæmi. Þetta ástand  eykur líkur á astma kasti, losti, öndunarfæra bilun, og jafnvel dauða. Sérstaklega á meðal barna.

 Heimildir birtar í Heather Fraser’s 2011 book The Peanut Allergy Epidemic/Hnetu Ofnæmis Faraldurinn benda á að bóluefnin tengist þessu óvéfengjanlega. 

Við höfum komist að því að viss flokkkur hjálparefna í bóluefnum , er mjög líklega orsakavaldurinn í því sem mætti kalla faraldur. [1]

En förum aðeins til baka. Við verðum að skoða nýliðna sögu bóluefna og sýklalyfja, og þær líffræðilegu breytingar sem innihaldsefni í þessum glænýju lyfjum geta haft á blóðið hjá börnum.

ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ

P.S..Tók eftir að eg hafði ekki þýtt smá,  svo ég set það hér óþýtt..Þýði síðar..

 HNETU HJÁLPAREFNINU HALDIÐ LEYNDU

KEEPING PEANUT ADJUVANTS A SECRET

The first study of peanut allergies was not undertaken until 1973. It was a study of peanut excipients in vaccines. Soon afterwards, and as a result of the attention from that study, manufacturers were no longer required to disclose all the ingredients in vaccines.

What is listed in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula. Same with the inserts.

Suddenly after 1973, that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers knew it must be protected. Intellectual property. So now they only were required to describe the formula in general.

Why was peanut allergy so violent?

Adjuvant pioneer Maurice Hilleman claimed peanut oil adjuvants had all protein removed by refining. [9]

The FDA disagreed. They said some peanut protein traces would always persist [10]- that even the most refined peanut oils still contained some traces of intact peanut proteins.

This was the reason doctors were directed to inject vaccines intramuscular rather than intravenous – a greater chance of absorption of intact proteins, less chance of reaction.

But all their secret research obviously wasn’t enough to prevent sensitivity.

Mother Nature know best: no intact proteins in the body. 60 million years of Natural Selection didn’t create the mammalian immune system for nothing. Put intact proteins, peanut or whatever, for any imagined reason into the human system and the inflammatory response will fire. And since the goal of oil emulsion adjuvants was to prolong reactivity in the first place – the notion of time-release – this led to sensitization.

HNETU -OFNÆMIS FARALDURINN

PEANUT ALLERGY EPIDEMIC

Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn’t until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts – the true epidemic appeared.

HVAÐ BREYTTIST?

What changed? 

The Mandated Schedule of vaccines for children doubled from the 80s to the 90s:

1980 – 20 vaccines
1995 – 40 vaccines
2011 – 68 vaccines

It would be imprudent enough to feed peanuts to a newborn, since the digestive system is largely unformed.

EN ÞETTA ER ENN VERRA.

But this is much worse – injecting intact proteins directly into the infant’s body. In 36 vaccines before the age of 18 months.

A new kind of anaphylaxis appeared with peanut reactions:

reverse anaphylaxis. (p 172, [1])

The reaction was not only to the sensitizing antigen, but to the weird new antibodies that had just been introduced in the human species by the new antigen. Without the usual benefit of the evolutionary process.

As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, hundreds of thousands of kids were now exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with frequent cases of anaphylaxis reactions, sometimes fatal.

EN ENGINN TALAÐI UM ÞAÐ..

But nobody talked about it.

Following the next enormous increase in vaccines on the Mandated Schedule after 9/11, whereby the total shot up to 68 recommended vaccines, the peanut allergy soon reached epidemic proportions: a million children: 1.5% of them.

These numbers fit the true definition of epidemic even though that word has never been used in mainstream literature with respect to peanut allergy, except in Fraser’s odd little book.

Many researchers, not just Heather Fraser, could see very clearly that

“The peanut allergy epidemic in children was precipitated by childhood injections.” ( [1], p 106)

Ending the peanut allergy epidemic by Heather Fraser

http://www.foodsmatter.com/allergy_intolerance/peanut_treenut/articles/ending-peanut-epidemic-09-15.html

But with the newfound research, the medical profession will do what they always must do – bury it. Protect the companies.

So no money will be ever allocated from NIH to study the obvious connection between vaccine excipients and peanut allergy.

That cannot happen, primarily because it would require a control group – an unvaccinated population.  And that is the Unspoken Forbidden.

Same line of reasoning that has prevented Wakefield’s work from ever being replicated in a mainstream US clinical study. No unvaccinated populations. Which actually means no studies whose outcome could possibly implicate vaccines as a source of disease or immunosuppression.

BÓLUEFNI SEM ORSAKAVALDUR OFNÆMIS FARALDRA?

Vaccines as a cause of an allergy epidemic?

Impossible. Let’s definitely not study it.

Instead let’s spend the next 20 years looking for the Genetic Link to the childhood peanut allergy epidemic…

In such a flawed system, any pretense of true clinical science is revealed as fatally handicapped of course: we are looking for the truth, wherever our studies shall take us, except for this, and this, and oh yes, this.

Evidence for the connection between peanut excipients and vaccines is largely indirect today, because of the circling of the wagons by the manufacturers. It is very difficult to find peanut excipients listed in the inserts and PDR listings of vaccines. Simple liability.

FRAME OF REFERENCE

So in addition to all the other problems with vaccines delineated in our text, now we have a new one – peanut oil excipients. Which all by themselves can cause severe, even fatal, episodes of shock, as well as chronic allergy – irrespective of the mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol, and the attenuated pathogens which the manufacturers do admit to.

Quite a toxic burden to saddle the unprotected newborn with. No wonder the US Supreme Court refers to vaccines as “unavoidably unsafe.”

Childhood allergies doubled between 1980 and 2000, and have doubled again since that time. [11] Theories abound. Childhood vaccines doubled at the same time. Why is there a virtual blackout of viable discussion about this glaring fact?

The epidemic of peanut allergy is just one facet of this much broader social phenomenon. We have the sickest, most allergic kids of any country, industrialized or not, on Earth.

A study of the standard literature of vaccines is identical to a study of the history of adjuvants – an exercise in cover-up and dissimulation. Unvaccinated children don’t become autistic.

And they don’t go into shock from eating peanuts. But there can never be a formal clinical study where the control group is unvaccinated. NIH would never do that. They cannot. They know the outcome.

HVAÐ ER AÐ VALDA HNETU OFNÆMI?

What Is Causing The Peanut Allergies?

http://www.vaccinationinformationnetwork.com/what-is-causing-the-peanut-allergies/

So if they know the peanut oil often causes violent reactions, and causes lifelong peanut allergies in millions upon millions of people, why are they using it instead of a safer adjuvant? Now, let’s get it straight that all adjuvants can cause problems, because it’s not just peanuts that the western world have skyrocketing allergic reactions to, but yes, there are safer adjuvants, so why not use the best one?

The simple answer is money. Vaccinations are a multi-billion dollar industry, and so is it’s spin-off, the allergy treatment industry. In fact, in the next few years, it is projected to pass the $50 billion dollar per year mark.

Now imagine this … you own a big company selling vaccines and you discover a substance which you can add to your vaccines to cause a lifelong allergy to in your customers. This gives you an opportunity to sell them protection products for their allergy, including anti-histamines, epinephrine injectors, and peanut patches for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.

 

HEIMILDIR

References

1. Fraser, H, The Peanut allergy epidemic, Skyhorse 2011
2. O’Shea, T, Vaccination is not immunization, thedoctorwithin 2013
3. Wallace, AR, Vaccine delusion, 1898
4. Richet, C, Nobel lecture, acceptance speech, 11 Dec 1913
   Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1901-1921, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967
   www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1913/richet-lecture.html
5. Von Pirquet, C, MD, On the theory of infectious disease
   Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 80, January 1987
6. O’Shea, T, Allergies: the threshold of reactivity
   www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/Allergies-The-Threshold-of-Reactivity/
7. O’Shea, T, The post antibiotic age
   www.thedoctorwithin.com/antibiotics/Post-Antibiotic-Age/
8. Jones, S, Peanut oil used in a new vaccine New York Times 18 Sep 13
9. HOBSON, D, MD, The potential role of immunological adjuvants
   in influenza vaccines Postgraduate Medical Journal March 1973 , no. 49, p 180.
   http://pmj.bmj.com/content/49/569/180.full.pdf
10. Technical Report # 595, Immunological Adjuvants, World Health Org. 1976.
    http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_595.pdf
11. FDA: March 2006. Approaches to Establish Thresholds for Major Food Allergens
    www.fda.gov/downloads/food/labelingnutrition/foodallergenslabeling/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/ucm192048.pdf
12. O’Shea, T, The threshold of reactivity
    www.thedoctorwithin.com/allergies/Allergies-The-Threshold-of-Reactivity/

13. There are precedents recent and historical (see  The Words Allergy and Anaphylaxis were Invented to Describe Vaccine-Injuries) for the causal link between vaccines and mass allergy.
    http://www.smartvax.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73%3Avaccine-induced-allergies

14. Vaccinations CAUSE Allergies!!

15. A Study of the Association of Vaccines with Food Allergies
16. http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/table_of_contents.htm

18. Peanut Oil Used in Vaccines Since the 1960s

     http://www.drpalevsky.com/articles_pages/346_Peanut_Oil_in_Vaccines_Since%20the_1960s.asp

    The Hidden Food Allergy That Causes Infertility

    http://barbfeick.com/vaccinations/allergy/960-infertility.html

    How A Gluten Allergy Can Effect Your Fertility

    http://www.gettingpregnantnow.org/Articles/Celiac Disease And Infertility.html

    Gluten Allergy And Recurring Miscarriage .
    

    http://www.gettingpregnantnow.org/Articles/Gluten_Allergy_and_Getting_Pregnant.html

    One in Six or one in Seven couples

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/5159380/Fertility-treatment-doubles-in-15-years.html

    Infertility affects about 6.1 million people in the U.S., equivalent to ten percent of the reproductive age population.

    http://www.psychologistanywhereanytime.com/adoption_psychologist_and_psychologists/psychologist_infertility.htm

    
    

    A Study of the Association of Vaccines with Food Allergies -
    This summarizes it all

    Allergy Background

    Another Nasty Side Effect from Vaccinations: A Lifetime Fear of Dying from Eating  - This epidemic has hit our vaccinated children, so most of the general public is unaware of the severity of the problem and cannot understand what is going on.
    Background - I was puzzled about peanut allergiesBackground-2Physical Symptoms of Food Allergies from Stopping Inflammation by Dr. Nancy Appleton
    Physical Symptoms - Videos

    Food Allergy Studies

    Peanut allergies in Indonesia & Thailand Peanut allergies and IsraelDo clean houses cause peanut allergies?Sesame Allergies

    Causes

    Peanut allergy and infant formula and vitaminsAntibiotics and AllergiesAllergic Dogs and other Animals

    Food Allergy Statistics

    Deadly PeanutsHistory Timeline of Vaccines & Food AllergiesStatisticsAge Study Table Meaningless Statistics

    Injections Cause Allergies

    Can vaccines cause food allergies?Egg AllergiesAnaphylactic children—canaries in the public health mine shaft?Cases of Vaccinations Directly Causing AllergiesWhy is the aluminum in the vaccines? Is it as innocent as the doctors say? "Aluminum is everywhere in the environment. The little bit in the vaccine can't hurt you...."Eczema is food allergy

    It's in There!

    It's in there!Culture MediumEvery single food allergy that I have found, I have also found the food listed in a patent (except for squid... I'm still looking)DiluentWorld Health OrganizationGenerally Recognized as Safe Inactive" Ingredients in Pharmaceutical ProductsFDAOils listed as ingredients in adjuvants and vaccines from patents on-lineWhat about milk allergy? Is milk used in vaccines?"Currently, most if not all vaccines available on the market today contain mineral oil as part of the adjuvant oil phase."Patents for vaccine ingredients such as adjuvants and mediumsPatents Pure peanut oilShellfish AllergyUS Licensed Vaccines (as of July 31, 2008) [I added last column - bfg]

    Experts

    CDC.Dr. Harry Hong, PhD, offers expertise on how to prevent children from dangerous allergies.eMJA The Medical Journal of AustraliaFood Allergies for Dummies FAANThe Complete Idiot's Guide to Food Allergies by Lee H. Freude, M.D., and Jeanne Rejaunier, Penguin Group Proof from the Experts!SichererDoublespeakDelayed-type hypersensitivity reaction due to vaccinationsWould you rather be a dummy or an idiot?

    Secret Ingredients

    Secret IngredientsRight to Know & Labeling package inserts

    Food Allergy Cures?

    A Vaccine to Cure Allergies?!?Peanut Allergy Cures?Service dog for the allergic

    Conclusion

    Vaccines are the direct cause for the deadly peanut allergy!!! Vaccine allergyStill don't get how vaccinations can cause peanut allergies??Save the Goober!

    Other Health Problems due to Food allergies

    Infertility and Food AllergyMental Health and Food AllergiesDeaths from Food allergies

    It's No Secret Now - Updates

    Updates - Medical community admits that vaccines cause allergies but downplays it. Public needs to wake their doctors up!
    Hypersensitivity Reaction to Vaccine Components - from Medscape - very clear that vaccines cause allergies to vaccine ingredients
    Wyeth Memo - memo made public. Pharmaceutical companies spread the distribution of batches of vaccines out over a wide geographical area so the public and doctors cannot connect the occurance of death or illness to a specific vaccine batch.

    Vaccine Ingredient Lists and allergies

    • BioThrax - Anthrax
    • Daptacel - DPT
    • Gardasil
    • Infanrix
    • Pediarix - DPT+HB+Polio
    • ProQuad - MMR+Varicella
    • Varivax
    • Zostavax

    Vitamin Shots

    Vitamin Shots for Newborn - peanut oil is in the vitamin K shot and it causes food allergies

    Vaccinations are the MAIN CAUSE of Food Allergies!!

    NewsTarget:"The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective,"

    said Dr. Len Horowit http://www.newstarget.com/022400.html