Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine
Færsluflokkur: Fjölmiðlar
26.9.2010 | 03:33
CHEMTRAILS áhrif á heðgun og heilsu.../Behavioral and Psychological Effects of Chemtrails.
Þessi mynd er tekin frá Englendingavík Borgarnesi.
All pic´s here are from my album, that is AGNY
This photo is taken from my house in BORGARNES, ICELAND..
http://www.facebook.com/notes/trinity-flowers/behavioral-and-psychological-effects-of-chemtrails-a-special-report/10150271392065594
A Special Report Trinity Flowers skrifaði þann 26. september 2010 kl. 01:18
Since 1996 when chemtrails began, the Y2K, Global Warming, Gasoline Prices, and now "the economy, and other "headlines" have amplified and accelerated people's fears more.
This fear may be caused by the chemtrails to take advantage of people's fears and force those in power to make new laws and further empower the chemtrail agenda.
Other effects from chemtrail fallout are are lethargic, sleepy, thoughts of lazyness. Keywords seem to evoke an emotional reaction. A thirst for Junk Food. Also the wind speed seems to increase after a few hours of chemtrails in the sky.
Please note there are doctors and medical professionals "disguised" from some agency that are fully aware of the chemtrail sprayings and they work mainly in the smaller doctors offices and medical clinics. When people are admitted to an emergency room or visit their clinic, they are fully prepared to start studying the effects of the people admitted, because they have been informed of the chemtrails sprayings in advance.
These people should not be trusted under any circumstances.
I see clients on a regular basis in my office and on some days the chemtrails seem to have a "dumbing down" effect on my clients when they walk in for their appointments. Most of all people become very sleepy and tired on some chemtrail spraying days.
It's like they become "sedated", they start yawning like they are real tired. I have also noticed a reactionary occurrence when I speak to people from my heart they react more during a chemtrail spraying. You will also notice that pigeons and other types of birds are not as active and become more still and quiet on chemtrail spraying days.
Other behavioral attributes include:
1* Slowed or delayed reaction time and hesitation or significant lack of coordination skills.
2* I have to talk slower and have more pauses in between my sentences when talking to people.
3* I have also observed an effect that people seem to spend more time on a computer when chemtrails are sprayed. This could be due to the delayed reaction in their thinking.
Emotional Attributes include:
Denial & Ignorance on certain matters.
THIS IS ALSO FROM MY HOUSE IN BORGARNES, ICELAND..
NICE VIEW I HAVE MOST OF THE TIME..
Chemtrails seem to have a variety of purposes, and they seem to disperse in a variety of visible patterns after spraying. Some chemtrails linger in the sky as "lines" or visible streaks. Other chemtrails seem to fan and spread out and cover the sky in a blanket of thick fog. Others seem to be invisible or have a very fine layer visible. It is also a fact that on very windy days, chemtrails seem to loose a lot of their effect, due to the strong winds, blowing them off course.
Some of the purposes chemtrails are used for are, weather modification as well as over the horizon radar, but what about mind control of the human population? Some days the chemtrails they spray are invisible, however you know when they have been spraying because in the late afternoon you will see a slight haze, especially if you use a mountain or other large land mass for contrast. You will see a brownish haze in the late afternoon.
Usually on these chemtrail spraying days, people seem more docile and these sprayings occur usually around solar disruptions or flares. One sure way to see if chemtrails have been sprayed for the day is to look at the horizon at dusk or sunset.
THIS IS TAKEN FROM MY PARENT´S FARM IN EYJAFJÖRÐUR N-ICELAND
You will usually see a blood red sunset or the chemtrail streams will be more visible.
In the area I live in (the silicon valley, california) when they have sprayed chemtrails, they lave a "tail" or a marker on the south horizon that is vertical.
I've also noticed those in certain occupational groups seem to have an immunity to the chemtrail effects. One of these is Auto Body workers, or those who work on fixing up damaged cars. I finally figured this out and it is that it is because these workers work in a sealed environment, (for detailing and repairing cars) and wear special protective masks that screen out dust particles.
THIS FROM MY HOUSE...NICE PINK CHEMTRAIL...
IT CHANGES FROM WHITE IN THE DAY TIME TO PINK IN THE NIGHT..
THIS IS IN JUNE OUR TIME WHEN WE HAVE LIKE DAYLIGHT IN NIGHT.
They also work with epoxy chemical resin, it is possible that wearing a mask keeps the chemtrail contaminants out and something in the epoxy resin may stop the DNA manipulation in the chemtrail mix from boding with the body's host.
It is also because they are "creative" in that they are maximizing their creative potential in creating /repairing cars, so they are not sabotaged by the effects of chemtrails. The same effect seems to be with workers who paint cars and are in a sealed environment and also wear protective masks and work in an environment that has filtered air.
Also I've noticed that when I work with epoxy resin (also known as Araldite), that when chemtrails are sprayed, the odor from the epoxy resin is lessened, and that my chemtrail immunity is strengthened. Also those that work in environments where UV lights are present.
This is because the chemtrail particles are attracted to UV light and, as we all know UV light kills bacteria and viruses.
Those most susceptible (næm/viðkvæm) to chemtrails effects are those who use religion, practice yoga or other methods of "escape".
ÞEIR SEM ERU VIÐKVÆMASTIR FYRIR ÁHRIFUM FRÁ CHEMTRAILS /EFNARÁKUM ERU ÞEIR SEM NOTA TRÚ, IÐKA JOGA EÐA AÐRAR "FLÓTTA" LEIÐIR.
These people have no will of their own and don't seriously question the corporate agenda, etc, rather they serve and honor the corporate agendas purpose and actions.
Some Chemtrails inflict Fear and Sabotage People's Creative Potential.
I also suspect that there are a select group of companies (possibly run by a covert agency) that provide air filtration systems that may have special air filtration screens that either "dumb down" the offices of the people working in them, or they provide a screen or filter from the chemtrail effects, when they install them in buildings and offices.
These companies are probably some sort of CIA or secret government companies that do this."Borderland Sciences has over the years done an extensive observation of the effects of solar activity on the general population with respect to temperament modification.
It has been empirically confirmed that SIDs (Sudden Ionospheric Disturbances), and Solar Flux Density increases have the particular effect of mania on the general populace, while low periods tend to display a tendency toward depression."
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000924.html
Here is another link by the International Psychiatry Congress
http://www.psychiatry.gr/congress_3/book.php
Is it possible that nano technology "comes alive" during these special periods?
Another connection to Canada:
10.7cm Radio Flux values are measured in Penticton, B.C. Canada
Solar Flux Archives:
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpmenu/plots/xray.html
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpdir/plots/xray/
http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpmenu/warehouse/2008/2008_plots.html
http://www.noaa.gov/sitemap.html
There is a link between the metal Titanium and Chemtrail Effects. Whether the Titanium is acting as an antenna to re-broadcast the frequencies or as a blocker, we still do not know.
But Titanium is starting to play a role in this chemtrail program.
Only further research will tell us for sure.
Article 1:
"The handful of cosmetics that contain them, such as clear sunscreens that use nano-scale titanium dioxide particles to shield the skin from ultra-violet sunlight"
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/15/no-nanoparticles-were-killed-making-this-post/
Article 2:
"This nanotube radio is over 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 times smaller than the Philco vacuum tube radio from the 1930s."
http://www.sciencebuzz.org/buzz_tags/nano?page=1
Article 3:
Surface Plasmonic Maskless Nanolithography using an Optical Antenna
http://www.sem.samsung.co.kr/cms/DownFileServletfilePath=%2Ffile%2FEdge%2F2007%2FGold02.pdf
Article 4:
"The military likes to see what information passes on line of sight phone systems.The method for doing this uses microwave techniques for isolators and use special compounds of barium, titanium, and iron sprayed into the microwave paths."
http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/Phelps_on_Chemtrails.pdf
"The synthetic fibers do not have central cores, which are commonly seen in cilia and natural fibers. Scattered black granules may be seen within the synthetic material, resulting from titanium, barium, and zinc used in processing."
Article 5:
http://morgellonswatch.com/2007/02/24/clarification-from-vitaly-citovsky/
If this is true, lead was removed from household paint a few years ago and replaced with Titanium.
If the Titanium is acting as an antenna/amplifier, than remote television/radio signals could be amplified to create mind mapping/programming or to generate Morgellons Disease, a possible link to chemtrails.
However, this is still only a theory and further testing will have to be done to prove/disprove this.
Quote from Conspiracy Planet:
"The satellites download holographic mind control movies, pictures, sounds, and sensations to people through this technology.
The Air Force has stated in "Air Force 2025" that their goal is to develop virtual and augmented reality mind control.
Depending on the how the computer is programmed or depending on the mood or intent of the person interfacing with the technology, you can be probed, bothered, gaslighted, frightened, manipulated, electronically raped, or tortured.
It scans your brain frequencies and deciphers your thoughts.
The satellites track you by mapping your bio energetic signature [body biometrics] and constantly scanning an area to find you."
Link:
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=42&contentid=5053&page=2%EF%BB%BF
Atmospheric Electrochemical Mind Control Related to Solar Flux Levels.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_mind_weather_control.htm
http://www.trufax.org/catalog/aw.html
Because some allergies can be cured using the Emotional Freedom Technique, is it possible that the chemtrails are causing allergies related to bioengineering Human Emotions?
If this is so, it means that some of the chemtrails effects can be counter measured by using the Emotional Freedom Technique to heal the allergies.
The allergies could also be a blockage occurring in the persons bio-emotional electrical system of their body, suppressing emotions being engineered by chemtrail technology.
More research is needed to finalize this link. Because newspapers are printed with soy ink, soy is the main culture medium scientists use to grow their bacteria in petri dishes.
If the chemtrails are bacteria related, than working with soy ink could greatly synergize the chemtrail effects.
Have you noticed that the national weather service seems to forecast "clear blue skies" and there are usually no chemtrails sprayed on these days.
And on "cloudy" days sometimes there is massive chemtrail spraying that occurs.
Research shows that the national weather service knows what is going on and is possibly participating in the chemtrail spraying program.
Here are some links that show more information.
That leads to a description of a new technology patent, which allows manipulation of the human central nervous system via broadcast television signal
http://www.bariumblues.com/nervous_system_manipulation.htm
http://www.assassinationscience.com/Chemtrails.htm
There exists an air force with its own rules, its own technology and its own agenda, which even overrides our president.
This "secret" government has been around since ancient times.
The earth is a living organism, responding to thoughts and human behavior.
There is manipulation of mans thoughts, behavior and actions with an agenda to keep man in the dark, in fear of realizing his/her true potential.
Chemtrails are just one method to keep man/women fearful and in the dark. Technology is also being used to enslave man/woman rather then free him/her.
Technology is used as a "lure", to keep man distracted, as a magic show magician uses to fool his audience.
Technology as well as chemtrails are trying to keep the different races of man/woman separate from each other as well as fighting against each other, so as to keep man/woman "in the dark" and not realizing that our true potential is to travel beyond the stars and explore our universe as peaceful beings.
Until we can learn to understand the forces that are binding us, only than will technology emerge as a leader and healer, rather than as an en-slaver and fear generating mechanism.
The good news is these manipulators are on their last legs and have already seen substantial "dents" in their agenda, thankfully due to people "waking up" from the dreamlike state they have chosen to remain in.
It is only when we realize they are trying to keep us apart and fearful that we have already won.
Their rule for thousands of years (about 5,000) is coming to an end and a new more beautiful era is emerging.
Source:
http://chemtrails.bust.angelfire.com/
*****************************************************************
AGNÝ bætti við /added
Chemtrails DataPage
http://www.rense.com/politics6/chemdatapage.html
AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf. YFIRLÝSING FRAMKVÆMDASTJÓRA FLUGFÉLAGS UM ÚÐUN KEMÍSKRA EFNA ÚT Í ANDRÚMSLOFTIÐ. Video og myndir.
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1009748/
Chemtrails and Deadly Vaccines:
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1018675/
WEATHER MODIFICATION. - When most people look up they see clouds. WE SEE POTENTIAL-VEÐURFARSSTJÓRNUN.. Sagt frá hvernig og með hverju.Photos!
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1042241/
CHEMTRAILS. What´s going on /Hvað er í gangi?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1080339/
U.S. NAVY TO CONDUCT MASSIVE ATMOSPHERIC EXPERIMENTAL TESTS
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/951886/
CHEMTRAILS Congressman Admits Chemtrail's
ÞINGMAÐUR VIÐURKENNIR TILVIST ÞEIRRA.
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/928827/
CHEMTRAILS. HVAÐ ER ÞAÐ? Er það venjulegur útblástur frá flugvélum...eða?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/576072/
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 16.4.2024 kl. 17:10 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (3)
23.8.2010 | 23:25
MENGUN FRÁ GRUNDARTANGA VIDEO OG MYNDIR..
Þetta var ekkert voðalega falleg sjón sem blasti við mér þegar ég nálgaðist göngin á leið frá Reykjavík til Borgarnes..
Reyk lagði með öllu Akrafjalli og liðaðist blá/gráleitur reykurinn áfram, svona læðupokaðist með fjallinu í áttina að Akranesi.
Ég tók að vísu engar myndir fyrr en eftir að ég kom upp úr göngunum ..
Hélt fyrst að það hlyti að vera kviknað í einhversstaðar..
En ekki var góð lyktin af þesum reyk þó svo að sagt væri að mengunin hefði ekki farið yfir hættumörk..
Þið verðið að afsaka gæðin á myndbandinu, kann lítið á þessa myndavél og lét hana bara ganga á meðan ég var á keyrslu ..
GRUNDARTANGI 23 ÁGÚST 2010 around 08:30 pm ..
I did shoot this driving from Reykjavik to Borgarnes..
Have to admit not nice and they claim the pollution did not exceed the limit the Environment Management said..
Have to say it did not look like that or smell.. The smoke was all way from the tunnel but was blowing toward´s Akranes ..Not so nice view on a sunny evening..Sorry for not so good quality, I do not know the camera good and I was also driving while I was shooting..
Agný..
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 24.8.2010 kl. 00:42 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (3)
ÞAÐ ER BÚIÐ AÐ GERA ALLAR SLÓÐIR SEM ÉG SETTI HÉR INN FYRIR 11 ÁRUM ÓVIRKAR!
EN SORRY FYRIR ÞÁ SEM FJARLÆGÐU ÞÆR, ÞÁ FANN ÉG ÞÆR AFTUR EFTIR LEIT Á VISSUM STAÐ..
ÞETTA HÉR UNDIR ER SLÓÐ INN Á SÍÐUNA:
https://www.overlordsofchaos.com/
https://www.overlordsofchaos.com/index.php/videos
ÞETTA ER SLÓÐ INN Á : (það er búið að taka þessa slóð niður. Núna er 2024 Mars...)
Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan?
In a nutshell "The Plan" is this: The Secret Planners of the New World Order's Evil Agenda intend to reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level "in perpetual balance with nature" by a ruthless Population Control Agenda via Reproduction Control and Genocide.
A Mass Culling of the People in a Planned Genocide via toxic adulteration of water and food supplies, weaponised microwave radiation, weaponised Chemtrails, release of weaponised man-made viruses, man-made pandemics, mass vaccination campaigns, civil and race wars culminating in the planned Third World War.
Then, the Dark Agenda will impose upon the drastically reduced world population a Global Feudal-Fascist State - the World Technate - with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank, World Currency and a micro-chipped population.
In short, to kill 90% of the world's population and to control all aspects of the human condition and rule everyone, everywhere from the cradle to the grave.
The COVID-19 Plannedemic has fundamentally changed the world: is there any doubt that the world - as you once knew it - no longer exists?
The Great War for Human Freedom has begun.
Gentle reader, understand, we live in truly perilous times, the Darkest Period in Human History is upon us.
In this sense, should be viewed as a genuine revelation of the plot to enslave mankind and enthrone an "aristocracy based on wealth" whose spiritual and temporal capital will be Jerusalem and whose spiritual source is the malefic spirit of immense power often called Satan but who is also called Ahriman. An ancient dream described in the words of the unknown author of the Protocols:
"We shall set up a super government that shall subdue all the nations of the world."
The plot has been unfolding for centuries before the Eye of History and can be seen today in the relentless destruction of, in the words of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, "all collective forces except ours." These "collective forces" are all things that underpin human existence and give society cohesion and individuals' identity, meaning and purpose but, especially, the concepts of Race, Religion, Nation and Family, all of which are products of Natural Moral Order.
It is this Natural Moral Order, brought about in its entirety by the Will of God, which is the true target of the Dark Powers acting on Earth at whose head seat enthrone two spirits of immense power that are the Dark Gods, Ahriman, and Lucifer, who are verily the two faces of Evil.
Although there is a definite spiritual awakening occurring on Earth, and more and more people are becoming aware that something is not quite right with things, it is a depressing fact that the majority of humanity are wholly ignorant of the dire predicament they are in.
That they are hopelessly enslaved in a material existence that is largely controlled by Secret Masters and that key to this enslavement is their dependence upon, and blind obedience to, the mode rn financial system.
Fundamental to the control of the modern financial system is the Central Banks and the few conjoined, intermarried families who own them, and pre-eminent among these are Rothschild and Rockefeller: respectively the European and North American foci of the Great Conspiracy. Whose exoteric organization and activities are often referred to as the Anglo-American Establishment.
The bankers and corporations associated with the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are part of the vanguard of the Great Conspiracy, representing a sort of corporate aristocracy, but they are not its leaders … this great power lies elsewhere; and those who hold it are verily the Lords of Power and are, in the temporal sense, truly the Masters of our Destiny.
This lesser power - the Corporate Aristocracy – often called the Anglo-American Establishment - have controlled Western Governments, the media, and education for more than a century.
Freemasonry, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Zionism, Neo-Conservativism, Feminism, the Homosexual Agenda, Multiculturalism and more are all their instruments of control since the attack on Natural Moral Order is perforce all-encompassing and acts on all levels of human existence.
ÞETTA HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN PÓSTAÐI ÉG 2010
-SEM SÉ FYRIR 10 ÁRUM OG OG ÞAÐ VIRÐIST ALLT VERA AÐ GANGA EFTIR SEM ÞETTA Z-ELÍTA PLANAÐI FYRIR MÖRG HUNDRUÐ ÁRUM!
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html
"Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation ... it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy, torture, starvation,
BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES,
by want, so that the goyim will see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else"
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/protocols__1_to_10.html#PROTOCOL10
from the much misunderstood and routinely maligned document called
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro.html
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, husband of Elizabeth II, quoted in foreword to Fleur Cowles,
If I Were an Animal (1987).
"The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day ... It's terrible to have to say this.
World Population must be stabilized and to do that we have to eliminate 350,000 people per day.
In one year that would equal 128 million people."
Jacques-Yves Cousteau (1910-97)
French oceanographer, filmmaker and environmentalist revealing the misanthropic nature of the UN and the radical environmentalist movement:
"Interview Jacques-Yves Cousteau,"
The UNESCO Courier, (1991)
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner,
CNN founder, Globalist and NWO insider quoted in
The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June (1996)
Gentle reader, understand, there is no "theory" involved when elucidating the complexity of arrangement, sweeping scope and incredible evil that is the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#RothkopfSuperclass
plan for World Government often called
the New World Order.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
The New World Order Agenda for World Government is not Conspiracy Theory but Conspiracy Fact.
Thus, any proper analysis of the New World Order Agenda for World Government is the analysis of an agenda, an Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government.
Hence, those who understand the true nature of the New World Order Agenda are not Conspiracy Theorists but Agenda Analysts.
The New World Order Agenda for World Governmenthas existed for millennia.Its main vehicle of transmission is
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1800-49.html#_NewmanconfediracyofEvildestroyingChurch
which has been called many things throughout the ages but is verily the Cult of Evil.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy___secret.html
Today the name Illuminati
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1935-39.html#AliceBaileyIlluminati
applies to parts of this ancient, evil cult. Generations of countless co-conspirators and numerous organisations carry forward the
Cult of Evil's
Ancient Hope for World Government
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy___secret.html
but inter-generational Luciferians and Satanists of the highest degree orchestrate it.
These Dark Adepts are the Secret Mastersof the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government often called the New World Order and whose power base is the
Dark Empire of Secret Societies.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__nature_and_f.html
Their Will
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/glossary_s_to_z.html#Will-to-Power
is projected throughout society and across the world via
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/freemasonry_3.html#DarkFreemasonry
and its countless front groups especially the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#Trilateral Commission
and the Council for Foreign Relations.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009.html#ObamaCFRansdTCmembers
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
is truly massive and beyond the ken of most people even those who profess expertise in it and make a good living from their books,tours and seminars "exposing" it.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2004.html#RoveSecretSocietiescreate own reality
is a tangled mass of interwoven threads with countless goals and myriad sub-agendas such that it is truly a Gordian-knot. Moreover, an intricate and tight knot very few have untangled.
They have failed not only because of the intricate nature of the task but also because they fail to understand that it is ultimately a religious agenda.
That is, they fail miserably to understand that what energises the
New World Order Agenda is not simple power-cravings but a deep spiritual impulse.
They do not understand that Dark Spiritual Forces energise the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_world_order_plan_to_milita.html
and those who are party to it.
They do not understand that Organised Evil on Earth is the organising brain of the New World Order Agenda and its acolytes are the true inheritors of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government.
Those who understand the
New World Order Agenda
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html
know that mankind is in the malignant grip of a
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__nature_and_f.html
the Ancient Cult of Evil.
They know that this secret cabal of inter-generational occultists serve
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/nature_of_evil.html
and work to bring about its ambition to usurp God's Rule on Earth.
They understand that the Ancient Evil Agenda is the five thousand
year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government, which many identify
as the New World Order Agenda.
They know that the unfolding agenda has involved millions of co-conspirators throughout history all linked by their worship and servitude to Evil.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__serious_obje.html
has worked ceaselessly to bring about conditions on Earth that have secured and advanced its cause.
They know that Evil has amplified its presence and influence on Earth such that now as the final phase of its agenda unfolds, it has (and largely unseen by the masses) control of the world by invisibly controlling government, the media, education and business.
Moreover, they understand that Organised Evil wants to establish their control on Earth totally, absolutely and forever.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that those behind
it must break humanity; they must break us, each and every one of us.
They know that they have to destroy America,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_9.html#USAmustbeDestroyed
the West and so Western Christian Civilisation itself as well as destroying every vestige of humanity's individuality, uniqueness,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1970-74.html#Piercekidsnustbeworldcitizens
and independent thought.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1970-74.html
Thus, those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that it is, in truth, Organised Evil's battle plan in its Total War with humanity and so, ultimately, its earthly strategy in its Cosmic War with God and Christ.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that the Political Class of the world, the majority of which are in bondage tot he Dark Power, to
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/freemasonry_3.html#DarkFreemasonry
have abandoned the people to their fate.
They know that the Political Class is in total thrall of
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_.html
and is merely a tool by which the New World Order Agenda is being completed.
They know that in its Total War with humanity one of Organised Evil's greatest weapons is control of the economy and why it now seeks to destroy it;
in preparation for the
New International Economic Order
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_.html
itself merely a stepping stone to Lucifer's One
World Government and Ahriman's One World Religion.
And, all those who truly understand the way of the world, who understand the New World Order Agenda, know this ...
They know that Organised Evil is the true architects of the New World Order Agenda and that verily Lucifer and Ahriman-Satan are the gods of this Evil Age (Matt. 4:8-9).
In addition, gentle reader, those who understand the New World Order Agenda also know intrinsic to it is a great and
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2006.html#Pianka
that demands the destruction of the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
of the world population to at least
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
This is Organised Evil's Planned Takedown of the World Population in which they intend the mass murder of millions by, in the words of the Demon speaking through the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro4.html#PiketrueVoiceofEvil
of the much misunderstood and routinely maligned document called
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,
"THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro.html
VIRUSES,BACTERIA, TRANSMISSIBILITY, VIRULENCE, EPIDEMICS & PANDEMICS |
There are three main classifications of contamination that threaten human life: microorganisms (living creatures); chemicals (which may be organic or inorganic in nature but are not alive) and Radioactivity (energy radiated or transmitted in the form of rays, waves or particles).
The Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
and its minions in governments, in the UN, the WHO and the myriad organisations,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1955-59.html#WormserFounationspowerinfluence
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1950-54.html#CFRresponsibleforpoliciesinimmicaltoUS
NGOs etc. that comprise the nascent New World Order, use all three classes,
as well as other more esoteric classes of contamination,
In its Total War with humanity, the New World Order crowd use two main strategies (together with their attendant weaponry) to cull humanity: the Soft Kill and the Hard Kill. the Hard Killing of humanity are violent,overt forms of death usually carried out in times of war, revolution and crises.
All modern, major phases of the Hard Killing of humanity are invariably created by the Illuminati and its
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/protocols__1_to_10.html#Agentur
for example, the French Revolution, the American Civil War, the Boar War,
the First and Second World Wars,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/islam_8.html#WW1WW2
the Korean and Vietnam Wars and, of course, the two Gulf Wars.
The planned Third World War
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_at_war_1.html
is intended to dwarf all these created conflicts in intensity, destruction and casualties such that the case for World Peace via World Government is beyond criticism.
Food adulteration and its contamination with toxic chemicals and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are softly killing humans.
Bio-weapons in the form of bio-engineered viruses and toxic, weaponised vaccinations are other suburb methods of
Soft Kill.
A Virus is the smallest of the organic hazards and range in size from 0.3 microns to 0.01 microns (a micron is one thousandth of a millimetre or one millionth of a metre). A virus is a simple organism being a piece of nucleic acid wrapped in a coat of protein.
It is not a fully formed cell and can only reproduce and grow by infecting a host where it inserts its nucleic acid (its RNA) into host cells.
In other words, a virus cannot grow or reproduce apart from a living cell.
Bacteria are single-celled organisms (prokaryotes) with a complete set of nucleic acid (RNA and DNA) and are much larger than viruses (0.5 microns to 5 microns and so up to 100 times bigger than a virus).
The majority of bacteria (90%) are harmless or beneficial to humans while some are dangerous e.g. Cholera and Typhoid
An Epidemic describes the widespread outbreak of an infectious disease with many people infected at the same time. Thus, it describes the situation when the number of cases of a particular disease exceeds the number that would normally be expected.
Epidemics of infectious disease can escalate into Pandemics, but do not always do so. A pandemic is an outbreak of a new infectious disease, which causes serious illness and spreads widely from person to person across more than one geographical region.
Two factors determine the course of an infectious disease: the rate of spread and the degree of danger of a virus: that is, its transmissibility and its virulence. The first determines the speed a virus spreads and the number of people will become infected. The latter determines how many people who are infected fall seriously ill or die.
Transmissibility is defined as the average number of people that each person with the virus will infect. This is the reproduction number, sometimes known as "R." If "R" is greater than one the virus is deemed to be spreading; if it is below one, then it is deemed to be petering out.
Many factors and variables determine the reproduction number and so the Transmissibility of a virus. Such as the biology of the virus, the level of immunity in the population, containment measures such as isolation, school closures and travel restrictions; moreover, especially, but not in the way the so-called "experts" declare or what the ignorant majority believe, is the use of antiviral treatments and vaccines.
The key measure of Virulence is the case fatality rate, that is, the proportion of infected people who die. To establish the case fatality rate for a pandemic one needs to know the total number of infections as well as the total number of deaths.
Thus, for example, the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918-19, the case fatality rate was about 2.5 per cent, while for the 1968 pandemic it was below 0.5 per cent. This explains the huge difference in the death tolls experienced at these times.
However, even a low case fatality rate would still be dangerous if the virus spreads widely. If 40 per cent of the population became infected with Swine Flu Virus, as the worst-case scenarios suggest and with a low case fatality rate of 0.1 per cent, there could be millions of deaths: as many as 240,000 deaths in the UK and 1.3 million in the USA.
|
A Virus is a micro-organism smaller than a bacteria, which cannot grow or reproduce apart from a living cell. A virus is thus a sort of parasite that invades living cells and uses their chemical machinery to keep itself alive and to replicate itself.
It may reproduce without error or with errors. If a virus reproduces itself with errors, a sort of bad photocopy of itself, then it is said to mutate. This ability to mutate is the reason why viruses are often difficult to treat since any mutation makes the virus slightly different in each infected person. Moreover, the rate of mutation differs in each virus species and obviously those that mutate the fastest are the most difficult to fight.
Infection is a growth of a parasitic organism within the body. A parasitic organism, a "germ" such as a virus, bacteria or yeast, is one that lives on or in another organism and draws its nourishment from it. .
Viral Infection is caused by the presence of a virus in the body and, depending on the virus and the person's state of health, various viruses can infect almost any type of body tissue and organ, from the brain to the skin. Antibiotics are useless against viral infections; indeed, in some cases the use of antibiotics makes the viral infection worse.
The body's own immune system can take care of the vast majority of human viral infections, with a little help in the form of proper diet, hydration, and rest, without recourse to drugs or other treatments. Depending on the type and location of the virus, attacks that are more virulent are treated with anti-viral or other drugs.
Seasonal Influenza, "the flu," is caused by viruses that infect the respiratory tract and are divided into three types, designated A, B, and C. Most people who get the flu recover completely in 1 to 2 weeks.
Nevertheless, some people (usually suffering underlying health problems and/or decrepitude) develop serious and potentially life-threatening medical complications, such as pneumonia.
The Medical Cartel Big Pharma,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html
the Medical Establishment and corrupt government structures) peddle the myth that much of the illness and death caused by influenza can be prevented by annual influenza vaccination.
Vaccines are "Immunogens" or "immunizing agents," which are substances or organisms that provokes an immune response (produces immunity) when introduced into the body. Invariably they consisting of a suspension of weakened or dead pathogenic cells (i.e. attenuated so as to lose its virulence but which carry antigens.) injected into the body in order to stimulate the production of antibodies (the large variety of proteins normally present in the body or produced in response to an antigen (toxin or enzyme) which it neutralises, thus producing an "immune response."
Immunisation against viral diseases invariably requires the virus used in the vaccine to be attenuated i.e. weakened or killed. Immunisation against bacterial diseases usually requires the use a small portion of the dead bacteria to stimulate the formation of antibodies against the whole bacteria.
Immunity is thus the condition of being immune, which can be innate (e.g. humans are innately immune to canine distemper) or conferred by a previous infection or immunisation.
In short: Vaccines are weakened or killed pathogens deliberately injected into the healthy body to produce a response in the body and hopefully the production of antibodies to counter the attenuated pathogens such that it will prevent future infection with similar but more virulent pathogens thereby preventing disease and/or death. Thus, vaccination is the term used to describe the use of vaccines to prevent specific diseases.
Vaccination is thus the injection into a healthy body of a killed microbe in order to stimulate the immune system against the "live" microbe. The theory is that vaccinations, or immunisations, work by stimulating the immune system, the natural disease-fighting system of the body. In addition, since the healthy immune system is able to recognise invading pathogens (bacteria and viruses) it produces substances (antibodies) to destroy or disable them.
In other words, immunisations is supposed to prepare the immune system to ward off a disease. Moreover, Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma peddle the myth that periodic repeat injections or "boosters" can improve the effectiveness of immunisations.
Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma know that any and all criticisms of vaccines should be vilified and ruthlessly suppressed because they know that otherwise the public might refuse to take them.
A situation made worse when the known risks of the vaccines far outweigh the dubious benefits and that this passes into common knowledge such that the public understand vaccines do more harm than good.
VACCINES DO NOT PREVENT DISEASE
" … the only safe vaccine is one that is never used."
Dr James R Shannon, former director of the US National Institute of Health.
The Medical Cartel Big Pharma,
the Medical Establishment and corrupt government structures) are master propagandists.
They are especially adept at convincing the public that Edward Jenner's discovery of vaccines transformed the world for the good.
That it single-handedly eradicated or made less devastating many debilitating diseases such as polio and smallpox. Moreover, that vaccines have changed how these diseases affect humanity, that they give protection from once global killers and so removed the constant worry of the parent that their child might be struck down early in life by smallpox or crippled by polio or damaged by a vicious strain of mumps, measles or rubella.
This may be great propaganda and excellent sales-pitch for vaccines but it is not the truth of the matter.
Adjunct to the Establishment's propaganda is
"Myths in Immunisation."
Here the Masters of Illusion
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1925-29.html#BernaysPropgandamouildingminds
tell us that Myths in Immunisation are as old as immunisation itself.
That even in the beginning, when Edward Jenner first developed his smallpox vaccine in 1796, the public was concerned that material from cowpox sores was used and directly injected into people causing strange responses.
Hence cartoonists of the age drew children growing cattle horns and while the early tabloid press give breathless accounts of extraordinary side effects:
"A child ran upon on all fours like a beast, bellowing like a cow, and butting with its head like a bull."
The master propagandists behind the New World Order Agenda, the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1925-29.html#BernaysPropgandamouildingminds
tell us that the rapid pace of vaccine development has been paralleled by a whole new generation of "Immunisation Myths." Myths that confuse the issue and lead the public, especially concerned parents, to think vaccines are bad and so do not vaccinate their children.
Where ignorance exists, say these authoritarian elitist, myths flourish. And unfortunately there is great ignorance on Immunisation even among those who give vaccines.
Thus, "Immunisation Myths" will endure and children put at risk so long as the public remain in ignorance of the true value and great benefits of vaccines.
Such is the persuasive nature of the propaganda spewed out of the mouths and from the pens of those who seek to destroy the viability of humanity by destroying the immune systems of individuals through vaccines and mass immunisation programmes.
The Invisible Money Power controls the world by control of every and all structures of power: and so controls Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma.
The Invisible Money Power, the Synagogue of Satan,
the Global Elite,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
the Illuminati,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati.html
call it what you will for it is the very same Beast, wants to set up a New World Order with a compliant, servile slave population.
Moreover, set up Lucifer and Ahriman's Global Kingdom with a population ideally
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
And one of the means they are using to do this is by controlling medicine, medical science and the production of drugs, their dissemination and use.
In other words, they now control the health of humanity and are busy destroying it by the ubiquitous use of allopathic drugs in general healthcare treatments and toxic, lethal vaccines used in mass immunisation programmes.
The Dark Powers and its Workers of Darkness are busily destroying the genetic make-up of mankind, busily introducing cancer-inducing agents into the individual and busily compromising the immune systems of all those foolish and trusting enough to take Big Pharma's toxic, lethal vaccines.
Reader, understand, vaccines do not work and have never worked the way their makers have said they did.
The living conditions in the Western World during the Industrial Revolution (the great transformation of Europe and North America from agricultural to industrial nations beginning in the early 18th century) where, for the most part and for the majority of people, horrendous.
Squalor and poor public health and hygiene resulted in massive mortality rates with the average age of death being 27. Poor sanitation compounded by polluted water supplies took their toll on the masses huddled in their squalid dwellings.
It was during this time of great change, urbanisation and industrialisation that the theory and practice of vaccination developed. Moreover, a time when the importance of public hygiene and unpolluted water supplies became evident to good health and when the city authorities began to do something about them.
With the provision of potable, safe public water supplies and the understanding and practice of public hygiene coupled with more sanitary private dwellings, the mortality rates began to tumble and people lived longer. This resulted in the explosion of population in the 19th century that seeded the expansion of the European empires around the world. Thus, as the theory and practice of vaccination and immunisation developed it was accompanied by the significant developments in public and private hygiene.
If careful study of both phenomenon is carried out (the theory and practice of vaccination and the theory and practice of public hygiene and health) then one is led to a startling conclusion. Much of the success attributed to vaccination programmes
(from which the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma make great propaganda)was due entirely to the great improvement in public health and hygiene.
Especially the great improvements in public water supply quality, in sanitation, in less crowded living conditions, in better nutrition, and in increasingly higher standards of living.
Throughout the industrialising and increasingly urbanised Western World, the incidences of a disease and mortality rates were in decline; but it is especially clear that the incidents of disease was clearly in decline before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. Thus, for example, in Great Britain, the incidence of polio had decreased by 82% before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In other words, vaccines were not the great saviours of society but incidental to the true causes i.e. good public health and individual longevity: greatly improved public water supply quality and sanitation combined with better quality dwellings, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition and increasingly higher standards of living. These factors were responsible for the spectacular turnaround in demographic trends not vaccines.
There is, in fact, compelling evidence that not only did vaccines not help in improving public health and individual mortality but that they do not actually work. That is, vaccines do not prevent diseases.
An example: Edward Jenner (1749-1823) is the English physician who is recognised as the pioneer of vaccination who inoculated people with small amounts of cowpox to prevent them from getting smallpox.
Cowpox is the viral disease of cattle causing a mild skin disease affecting the udder and Jenner supposedly noticed that milkmaids seemed immune to smallpox and reasoned that their exposure to the cowpox somehow made them impervious to the much more dangerous smallpox.
He thus scraped the cowpox pus from infected cow udders and injected it into healthy people, with supposed positive health results. That is, in 1796 he developed his vaccine that he said had produced immunity to smallpox.
Soon it was believed that the Cowpox vaccine was able to immunise people against smallpox. However, at the time the Cowpox vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in Western Europe in the number of cases of Smallpox. In 1867, Great Britain carried out a draconian and compulsory Smallpox vaccine programme and those refusing the vaccine were prosecuted. Within 4 years, it is estimated that 97.5 % of Britons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. Yet, the following year, Britain experienced the worst recorded smallpox epidemic in its history with 44,840 deaths. Moreover, in the period 1871-80 the incidence of smallpox in Britain escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000.
Another example is Japan, which introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872 and yet in 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination programme.
Hence the conclusion: The smallpox vaccine does not work.
The devastating conclusion is that vaccines do not work and that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous. What is more, they are never studied for safety before their general use.
So why are they used?
The uninformed will quickly say that the only reason for their existence is to increase the profits of pharmaceutical firms.
The more informed would agree but would add that profits alone are not the true purpose of vaccines, rather, that those who profit from them know what damage they do and are developing even more potent ways of increasing this damage.
Because the Dark Powers controlling Governments,
the Medical Establishment and BigPharma have an
Eugenic Population Control Agenda
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
and vaccines and their universal use are intrinsic to it.
The Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008__2_.html#Bilderberger Conference Attendees
behind the Eugenic Population Control Agenda do not publicise their aims, it is not discussed in their propaganda media organs and TV, for instance.
However, it is scattered about in the musings, writings and policy documents of the New World Order's numerous mouthpieces and front groups.
Thus, for example, the influential
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/ufo_agenda_17.html#club_rome
position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90%,
or Ted Turner and Jacques Cousteau's
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
comments in agreement, and the so-called
American Stonehenge in which it is carved in stone.
They all, and many others, agree that the present population of 6 billion people is far too many for
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/craftmasonry.html#Great_Mother_Goddess
to support and is "unsustainable" and must be reduced to at least 500 to 600 million
"in constant balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
|
Vaccines do not prevent diseases. This fact is easily demonstrated by the numerous cases of vaccine failures. That is, when disease outbreaks occur in populations that have been thoroughly vaccinated. Some examples should suffice to illustrate the phenomenon of vaccine failure.
Diphtheria is the acute contagious infection caused by the bacterium Corynebacterium diphtheria and is marked by the formation of a false membrane in the throat and other air passages causing difficulty in breathing. England and Wales instituted diphtheria vaccination in 1894 causing the number of deaths from diphtheria to rise by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years.
In Germany, Adolf Hitler instituted compulsory vaccination in 1939 after which the rate of diphtheria rocketed to 150,000 cases that year. However, in Norway, which did not have compulsory vaccination, only 50 cases of diphtheria were reported in the same year.
Measles is the acute and highly contagious viral disease marked by distinct red spots followed by a rash and occurs primarily in children. Epidemiology (branch of medical science dealing with the transmission and control of disease) shows that measles mortality rates had declined by 97% in Britain before measles vaccination was instituted in schools.
Also, outbreaks often occur in schools with high vaccination rates (over 98 %) including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. There are also reported outbreaks of measles occurring in schools where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. In other words, not only does it not do what it is supposed to do and stop measles but also, with high measles immunisation rates, it causes the outbreak of the disease only in vaccinated persons. That is, the measles vaccine causes measles in healthy populations.
Whooping Cough (pertussis: A disease of the respiratory mucous membrane) was a disease routinely given by Western governments to its children. In 1975, Germany stopped compulsory vaccination such that now less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against Whooping Cough.
Yet, the number of cases of Whooping Cough has steadily decreased even though far fewer German children are receiving the Whooping Cough vaccine.
In the Netherlands, where for more than 20 years 96 % of babies have received three pertussis shots in their first year of life, Whooping Cough remains endemic. In 1986, there were 1300 cases of Whooping Cough in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated.
Similarly, epidemiological records show vaccine failure in Nova Scotia where Whooping Cough continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination.
This proves among other things that immunity is more complex than in the theory of vaccination promulgated by Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma. It illustrates that there is a fundamental difference between life-long immunity from natural infection and that supposedly given by vaccines. It shows that simply injecting attenuated pathogens and other dubious substances directly into the bloodstream does not bestow longevity and good health.
It clearly demonstrates the great flaw in the injection process (injecting viral and other toxic particles directly into the blood):
that once these toxins have been introduced into the body there is no adequate way to eliminate these foreign substances.
To create real immunity a full inflammatory response from the body is necessary. The body's immune system must be fully taxed by the pathogen to give future immunity to it. This does not occur when attenuated pathogens are introduced into the body via vaccines.
Before the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign since the immune systems easily handled the invasion. Vaccines drenched in attenuated pathogens (e.g. measles and mumps) indeed trigger an immune response but also "trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus. The corollary of this is that vaccines are not only superfluous to good health, longevity and life-long immunity but that they actually compromise all three. In other words, vaccines are bad for human health.
VACCINE LABS UNSAFE AND UNCLEAN
The Medical Cartel (the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma) promotes the idea that vaccine laboratories and manufacturing facilities are some of the cleanest and antiseptic places in the world. The truth is they are not and contamination occurs all the time.
Thus, purity and cross-contamination are major issues since all sorts of debris are introduced into vaccines.
For example, the "SV40 monkey virus" that found its way into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys.
The "SV40 monkey virus" was later found in cancer tumours in humans and so those who "took the shot" were infected with the monkey virus, which contributed to their cancer.
In other words, the use of monkey kidneys to make the polio vaccine opened the door to a strange, foreign germ from a different species to infect the human body. The corollary is thus that by using a variety of species to manufacture various vaccines in facilities suffering from defective protocols and procedures will inevitably introduce foreign germs into the vaccines, which will cause perturbations to the human immune system.
The actual lab conditions, the mistakes and careless errors -the human error factor- are endemic to the manufacturing process. Thus, contamination of vaccines is a structural problem that cannot be eradicated. Consequently, it is an accepted part of the vaccine manufacturing process and vaccine makers know that different types of contaminants deleterious to human health are part of their vaccines.
Put differently, contaminants that are very dangerous to human health that should not be in the vaccines are in the vaccines due to unavoidable "mistakes" and are introduced directly into an individual's bloodstream, by-passing their normal immune defences, when they "take the shot."
For example, various chicken viruses in the Rimavex measles vaccine; Acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba, and Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine; Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine; Bird-cancer viruses and Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine; Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine; Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine as well as dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines.
These are all contaminants that should not belong in the vaccines but are because of poor protocols and human error.
Some vaccines, such as some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella, Hep A and measles, are made with aborted human foetal tissue. The morality of this notwithstanding, these vaccines are also contaminated with elements from the foetal tissue, such as bacterial fragments and poliovirus.
Animal tissues from various species are routinely used in vaccine manufacture, which is the main source of "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Other toxic, carcinogenic materials are also purposely put into vaccines such as chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminium.
The basic premise about vaccines is founded upon
faulty grounds.
This states that vaccines are wonderful medicines because they are safe and work wonderfully well. It further states that vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. A vaccine does this by "creating" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. It is a simple premise but one that does not stand up to scrutiny.
The human immune system is much more sophisticated than the one presented in the Medical Cartel's paradigm. It is more complex, larger and more involved than simply antibodies and their related "killer cells."
The human immune system is the entire body, including the mind. That is why in the middle of a pandemic many individuals remain healthy because their level of general health is good and so their immune system is strong.
Thus, vaccine contamination by biological contaminants such as "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses" is unavoidable many of them also remain undiscovered. Using animal tissue invariably means using material contaminated with "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Moreover, the exact number and nature of them is unknown. Thus, vaccine manufacturers do not know what or how many contaminants are in their animal tissues.
They have no idea how many possible germs are in these animal tissues and so no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans when introduced directly into the bloodstream and by-passing normal immune defences. Furthermore, many biological contaminants remain undiscovered because researchers and quality control do not to look for them.
Consequently, no attempt to calculate or quantify the damage caused by these contaminants is undertaken. No or very little testing is done and so no degree of risk in "taking the shot" is carried out.
In short, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way according to the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/humanist_agenda__when_man_beco4.html#Scientific_Method_
Taking the vaccine shot is like taking part in Russian Roulette. You take the chance that your "shot" will not hurt or kill you by giving you the disease it is intended to protect you from, or by inducing a massive allergic reaction or by giving you a contaminant that produces delayed reactions like cancer.
Many toxic elements are present in vaccines. They are there primarily due to human error and poor procedure.
However, some are there by design and euphemistically called "adjuvants."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob2.html#vaccine_toxic_lethal_cocktails
That is, put in by their makers to perturb and disrupt the human immune system. That is why vaccines are the true weapons of mass destruction in the Soft Kill phase of the Power Elite's Total War with humanity.
Many toxic elements are found in vaccines and some of them are very difficult to identify.
These are the "foreign proteins," which could mean almost anything.
It could mean protein from foreign viruses that should only be found in the animals it was designed by God to infect.
"Foreign proteins" and other toxic, lethal materials injected directly into the bloodstream without passing through the ordinary human immune defences.
Animal tissues from various species are routinely used in vaccine manufacture, which is the main source of "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Other toxic, carcinogenic materials are also purposely put into vaccines such as chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminium.The basic theory of vaccines is founded upon faulty grounds, especially two false premisses.
First, the premiss that vaccines are wonderful medicines because they are safe and work wonderfully well.
Second, the premiss that vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. A vaccine does this by "creating" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. It is a simple premise but one that does not stand up to scrutiny.
The human immune system is much more sophisticated than the one presented in the Medical Cartel's paradigm. It is more complex, larger and more involved than simply antibodies and their related "killer cells." The human immune system is the entire body, including the mind. That is why in the middle of a pandemic many individuals remain healthy because their level of general health is good and so their immune system is strong.
VACCINE STATISTICS FALSELY PRESENTED
Vaccine statistics are routinely misrepresented to support the Medical Cartel's paradigm and to conceal the real and dangerous nature of inoculation. A favourite trick is conceal vaccine failure by misdiagnosis and calling a disease something else. For example, people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine and yet still come down with hepatitis.
Since, hep B is a liver disease it can by diagnosed as other things, the doctor or statistician can change the diagnosis, thus, concealing the root cause of the problem. This is greatly helped by ignorant and trusting doctors who believe the propaganda of their profession.
Doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines do not come down with the diseases they are supposed to be protected from. Hence, if a person who is vaccinated against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the doctor's automatic assumption is it had nothing to do with the disease and that the vaccine has done its job.
In short, the Medical Profession is a closed system and admits no fault; especially in regard to vaccines.
VACCINES NOT TESTED IN SCIENTIFIC WAY
Vaccines are not tested in a scientific way according to the
Scientific Method, for, to do so would expose them for the real hazards to health they represent.
For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines and neither is long-term follow-ups carried out in any careful or systematic way. The reason for this abuse of the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/humanist_agenda__when_man_beco4.html#Scientific_Method_
by vaccine manufacturers and the enforcing authorities is due to the universal assumption that vaccines do not cause problems and any meaningful check would be a waste of time and resources.
Moreover, an adverse vaccine reaction is defined by the Medical Cartel such that they only occur very soon after the shot is given. In other words, a situation that does not make sense or stands up to scrutiny. Vaccines obviously act in the body long after it they are given and a reaction can be gradual, weeks, months even years later.
Physical deterioration can be gradual and neurological problems can develop over time, as they do in various conditions and poisonings.
Hence, toxic conditions develop over time with other allopathic treatments and poisons passed off as medicines so surely they can also develop at a much later time with the very toxic vaccines, and even more so?
There are numerous cases where a vaccine as not only
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html#vaccine_failures
but the entire campaign highlighted the great harm inherent in the vaccination process. That is, where people en masse have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
Even the many instances of vaccine failure are glossed-over and the mountain of evidence ignored. In addition, if any of the vaccine failures are addressed the "experts" dismiss it as an isolated situation and state that overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe "elsewhere" and in "tests."
Nevertheless, all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred should alert the wise that these "vaccine failures" are not isolated situations.
However, the Medical Cartel's power is such and its
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/ufo_agenda_12.html#MastersofIllusion
and all pervasive that the obvious empirical evidence and strong correlations that proves and demonstrates vaccine harm are suppressed. Moreover, any one from the medical profession who dares challenge this suppression of truth risks not only his career and reputation but his life as well.
Moreover, that such clear evidence and strong correlations indicate harm, damage and death arising from vaccine use and no proper investigations are carried out alerts the wise that something is very wrong.
In addition, if an investigation is done people who assume that vaccines are safe and so are not interested in looking at the facts carry it out.
That is, when they do investigate they do so with preconditions and assumptions, definitions and ideas, which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
They investigate believing that inoculation is a proven and powerful medical treatment and any vaccine is safe. Thus, invariably, these prejudiced investigators come up with exonerations of the vaccine and pass these off as objective science in reports endorsing not only the vaccine in question but also vaccinations in general.
A salient example of this phenomenon is the treatment meted out by the Medical Establishment to the British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
Wakefield was the lead author of a 1998 research study published in
The Lancet titled
"Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis,
and pervasive developmental disorder in children"
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext
in which the link between the was made with the MMR vaccination and MMR vaccinated children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and other disabilities.
Although the correlations between the MMR vaccine and autism are stunning it did not cause the Powers-that-be to thoroughly investigate the problem, rather, it only provoked the Medical Cartel to strike out at this man and his research.
As the controversy raged and concerned parents sensed that Wakefield told the truth, Wakefield resigned from the Royal Free Hospital in December 2001,
saying "I have been asked to go because my research results are unpopular."
The medical school said that he had left "by mutual agreement."
In February, 2002, Wakefield stated, "What precipitated this crisis was the removal of the single vaccine, the removal of choice, and that is what has caused the furore - because the doctors, the gurus, are treating the public as though they are some kind of moronic mass who cannot make an informed decision for themselves."
Eventually he was in front of the highest disciplinary board of the British Medical Establishment defending himself from charges of serious professional misconduct for his temerity in investigating the links between the MMR jab and autism in children.
Wakefield faced a disciplinary hearing
at the General Medical Council in London and faced being struck off the medical register after he and two colleagues published their findings and a direct link between the triple jab for measles, mumps and rubella and inflammatory bowel disease and autism.
Dr Wakefield defended himself by declaring that he had responded to the "plight" of mothers with sick children and it was his "duty as a physician and a human being" to carry out such investigations.
Later, in 2004 and 2006, Wakefield was accused by the Sunday Times of a conflict of interest in that monies were given to his erstwhile employer, the Royal Free Hospital (£55,000 from the UK's Legal Aid Board to pay for the research) and Wakefield himself who received an undisclosed £400,000 by the lawyers responsible for the MMR lawsuit.
The Lancet responded to the Sunday Times' investigation in a public statement, describing Wakefield's research as"fatally flawed," and said it would have rejected it as biased if the peer reviewers had been aware of Wakefield's conflict of interest. Although Wakefield denied the charges twelve of his co-authors of the Lancet paper later published a retraction of an interpretation.
In February 2009, the Sunday Times again attacked Wakefield by reporting that a further investigation had revealed that Wakefield "changed and misreported results in his research, creating the appearance of a possible link with autism."
Throughout the controversy various Medical Establishment elements and "experts" upheld the dogma and vigorously maintained that no link has been found between the MMR vaccine and autism and by inference that no link generally exists between vaccines and diseases.
This is a cynical and wicked stance given the number of vaccines routinely given to babies and infants today. Toxic vaccines whose synergistic effects, whose combined destructive power, are evident from the empirical evidence and from the obvious chronic sickness of contemporary society that has been vaccinated to an inch of their lives.
No real public and published studies of any depth have been carried out on the synergistic effects of vaccines.
Again, the general assumption made by both the Medical Profession and the trusting public is that all vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But, the truth is no vaccine is safe and so the potential damage increases when you give a number of them and especially in a short time period. And especially to babies whose immune systems are poorly formed, vulnerable and easily compromised.
Hence, the Medical Cartel's development, use and defence of vaccines are both a travesty of truth and a crime against humanity.
MEDICAL CARTEL FAILS TO PROVE VACCINES SAFE
The Medical Cartel has not only failed to establish the safety and efficacy of vaccines it has not taken the great moral duty to establish burden of proof that they are safe to use. It has wilfully neglected or ignored proofs to the contrary that dispel the myth of vaccination as the wonder treatment that has eradicated some of man's greatest enemies. In short, the Medical Cartel has failed to establish burden of proof that vaccines are effective and safe.
Moreover, peddles a medical myth, a non-scientific and dangerous assertion, that vaccines work and are safe.
The burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people and vested interests, which manufacture, licence and profit greatly from them during public mass vaccination programmes.
The burden of proof is not on the recipients, the trusting, naive public, but Big Pharma, the Medical Establishment and government.
And for adequate proof, well-designed long-term studies with extensive follow-ups are required. That is, proper and unbiased epidemiological studies carried out by unprejudiced, disinterested competent scientists not in thrall or the pay of Big Pharma.
And particularly, researchers who properly and thoroughly interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. In short, the necessary and essential requirements that are not present in the Medical Establishment's authorised and mandated researches on vaccines and their effects upon human health.
The Medical Cartel's reluctance to carry out their due diligence and to establish the necessary burden of proof that their vaccines work and are harmless is understandable.
Why? Because vaccines do not work and are harmful to human health and any proper study of the subject would reveal this; which, of course, is something the Medical Cartel does not want to happen.
Vaccines and mass vaccination are intrinsic to the New World Order Agenda's Eugenic Population Control Agenda
by which the Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
plan to remove over 90%
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1995-99.html#Ted_Turner95percentreductionoofPOPULATION
of the world population and leave alive only
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
In other words, vaccines and mass vaccination are crucial parts of the Soft and Hard Kill strategies used
by the Power Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#RothkopfSuperclass
to cull and control humanity and nothing will prevent it from using them.
And certainly, no proper and adequate studies highlighting their baneful effects upon both the individual and society will stop them.
DISEASE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY VACCINES
Using vaccines can cause two potential harmful outcomes. One, because some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with the vaccinee gets the disease from the vaccine, which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Two, the vaccinee does not get the disease in the vaccine, but at some later time they develop another condition that is caused by the vaccine. For example, autism, or meningitis, or they become mentally disabled and, very commonly, develop some form of cancer in middle age.
The relative frequencies of these different outcomes are very hard to establish since the Medical Cartel has no vested interest in establishing them. On the contrary, they have every reason to obscure them.
Hence, the deliberate policy encouraged by the Medical Cartel of slack, sloppy science involved in vaccine manufacture and use. Moreover, the deliberate sketchy and poor follow-up research into a vaccine's effects upon the individual, especially months and years after "taking the shot."
Thus, in absence of proper research and adequate figures no reliable answers can be given on this most important matter. There can be no definitive answers to questions such as how many out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine. There are no reliable answers to such questions but anecdotal evidence and the spectacular rise of cancers and other emerging diseases imply that something is very wrong.
Vaccines are mysterious medicine; they are mystical preparations holding almost mythical status and as such are surrounded by many superstitions. And, as with all superstitions, there is a great deal of opinions and beliefs but very few useful facts. Furthermore, there are many stories most of which are designed to enforce the superstition and which are roundly endorsed by the Medical Cartel.
However, from many vaccine campaigns, various parts can be pieced together from which a narrative emerges that does reveal some very disturbing things. It is a narrative that tells how vaccines are harmful to human health and that many people have been harmed, a real harm often ending in death. Moreover, a narrative that tells how the harm is not limited to a few cases, as the Medical Cartel would gave us all believe, but is widespread and enduring.
The spectacle of groups of mothers who testify to the direct link between autism and childhood vaccines, who come forward and standing up at public meetings is a salient example of this great scandal. That they are essentially filling the gap created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
ANTIVIRAL PILLS
Ever since Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin in the 1940s, drugs that kill viruses have been the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/holy_grail.html
of modern medicine. Penicillin is the group of antibiotics obtained from Penicillium moulds and used in the treatment of various infections and diseases. Penicillin was the first drug that could kill a broad spectrum of bacteria in the human body; consequently, they have saved many millions of lives.
Nevertheless, modern medicine has signally failed to find a drug that would be as affective on the viruses. In other words, there has never been a drug, which kills viruses the way antibiotics killed bacteria.
Hence the problem with colds and flu:
most of them are viral and so antibiotics are ineffective.
This then begs the question is there really such a thing as a drug that kills viruses:
Do the so-called antiviral pills such as "Tamiflu" work?
The manufacturers, of course, think so and make extravagant claims about their effectiveness.
Hence, "Tamiflu" maker Gilead whose blurb, without citing actual studies, that:
"The results of several clinical studies show that Tamiflu is up to 92% effective in preventing influenza illness in adolescents, adults and the elderly when taken once daily … [Tamiflu] is the first antiviral pill, effective against all common strains of flu, that can safely protect people who are in close contact with someone who has the flu."
However, pulling away the dense cloak of sales pitch and PR cloaking Gilead's "Tamiflu" one finds the actual words of the scientists involved in its production and their professional opinion on it.
The Physician's Desk Reference (Big Pharma's bible) tells a different story than the one presented in Gilead's propaganda.
In the Physician's Desk Reference, we read that "Tamiflu's" declared action is that it prevents flu viruses from collecting on cells by inhibiting a specific enzyme (neuraminidase ) which helps viruses to bind to cells.
However, there are problems with this.
First, the makers cannot prove this action, do not know if this is indeed the action of the drug, and so, are obliged to refer to it as the "proposed" mechanism of activity.
Second, and more pertinent, Gilead's scientists state that even though this "proposed" mechanism of activity seems to occur in culture, in Petri dishes in controlled laboratory conditions, "the relationship between the activity in a culture and the inhibition of influenza virus replications in humans has not been established."
In other words, Gilead's scientists who formulated "Tamiflu" admit that they do not know whether it works in humans.
Even if "Tamiflu" did what it says on the box, and inhibit virus proliferation in humans, it would not be effective for very long.
The Influenza Viruses are one of the fastest mutating of all known human viruses, mutating several times in one flu season.
Mutation even occurs within the same person.
Thus, at any one time there are hundreds of strains of influenza infecting people. This rapid mutation and scores of different strains is the reason why flu vaccines have never worked and have had virtually no effect on the incidence of flu.
Thus, while the flu viruses mutate the so-called antiviral pills do not and are rendered useless if, of course, they had any use in the first place
Gilead's scientists admit as such:
"Insufficient information is available to fully characterize the risk of emergence of Tamiflu resistance in clinical use."
The Physician's Desk Reference contains other pertinent information on "Tamilflu," for instance, the short window of opportunity claimed for its effectiveness.
"Tamiflu is indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza infection in patients 1 year and older who have been symptomatic for no more than 2 days."
In other words, the scientists are saying"Tamiflu" does not work if the patient has had the flu for more than two days. Further reading reveals other serious limitations.
For instance, that "Tamiflu" cannot help any patients who are already sick with the flu but also its makers admit that they do not know if multiple courses of "Tamiflu" are safe, since they never tested for more than one course.
The manufacturers also state they cannot guarantee the safety a foetus during pregnancy if their drug is used and so warn pregnant woman not to take it. Therefore, they do not recommend "Tamiflu" during pregnancy.
The Physician's Desk Reference lists other declared side effects of "Tamiflu," a drug that has never been proven to work in humans, they are:
rash; swelling of face; epidermal necrolysis (skin death); hepatitis; cardiac arrhythmia; and aggravation of diabetes seizures.
"Tamiflu," which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, has never been proven to work in humans.
Moreover, it has had no effect on the incidence of flu since its first use.
The US Centres of Disease Control (CDC) has tested more than 50 strains of
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob.html#origin_h1n1
and found that 98% of them are resistant to "Tamiflu."
And yet it is now being glorified as a possible "Magic Bullet" for the Swine Flu Pandemic. Such is the nature of the antiviral pill and the Dark Propaganda associated with it that the Medical Cartel and mainstream media are hawking as the saviour of humanity from the Swine Flu Plague.
Gentle reader, understand, the Medical Cartel is not a benign alliance working for the best interests of society. At its highest level, the Medical Cartel is controlled by people who are not dedicated to helping people but, on the contrary, out to do them great harm.
They are people who work to a different agenda than the one supposed.
They are working to a Dark Agenda whose goal is the decimation of the world population, especially the Third World peoples, by whatever means necessary. And the Medical Cartel has found a wonderful tool to help them achieve their goals of world depopulation: and that is vaccines, which weaken people, make them
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob.html#sterilisation_vaccine
Moreover, reader understand, vaccines and mass vaccination are intrinsic to the New World Order Agenda's Eugenic Population Control Agenda
by which the Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
plan to remove over 90%
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/199599.html#Ted_Turner95percentreductionoofPOPULATION
of the world population and leave alive only
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 31.3.2024 kl. 04:08 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
16.4.2010 | 04:31
Israel did 9/11
Israel did 9/11 . PART I
Figuring out exactly how 9/11 was done is the work of crime investigators or conspiracy hobbyists who will endlessly go on discussing and debating every minuscule and intricate detail of the event to no avail. It doesn't take a structural engineer to tell you that two 110 story buildings and a 47 story steel skyscraper plummeting to the ground at nearly free-fall speed requires the assistance of explosives. All you need is two eyes that can see and a brain that thinks to come to that sound conclusion. This is why it is of my opinion that more emphasis should be placed on the "who" instead of the "how". It should be obvious to anyone that discovering 'who did 9/11' is infinitely more important than discovering how they did it.
An Uncanny Prediction Comes True
First we start off with an unusual and eerie prediction that was made by a most suspicious individual. This prediction, in unison with the status of the person of who made it, is extremely indicative and foretelling of who planned and executed 9/11.
Isser Harel - Spymaster of the Israeli Intelligence Services. Director of Mossad and Shin Bet from 1952-1963.
In 1979, twenty-one years before September 11, 2001, Isser Harel predicted with uncanny accuracy the events of 9-11 to Michael D. Evans, an American supporter of Zionist extremists of the Jabotinsky sort.
On September 23, 1979, Evans visited Harel at his home in Israel and had dinner with him and Dr. Reuven Hecht, a senior adviser to then prime minister Menachem Begin.
In an editorial entitled "America the Target", published in the Jerusalem Post of September 30, 2001 Evans -- a Khazar Jew masquerading as a Christian -- asked Harel about Arab terrorism and if it would come to America. Harel told Evans that Arab terrorists would likely strike the "tallest building in New York City" because it was a "phallic symbol". The fact that 9/11 was planned by the Mossad through the admittance of Isser Harel is well documented and appears in a book written by Michael Evans. (See Article 7th Paragraph).
Securing Control of World Trade Center Complex
The first step in the preparation of the 9/11 attacks was to secure the control of the WTC into private hands. This was crucial to the success of 9/11 because without complete control over this complex there would be no opportunity or possibility of setting explosive charges in place as the coup de gras in bringing the towers to the ground.
In steps four key Jewish Crime Network assets:
1) Larry Silverstein -- Larry is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Larry obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. The nearly worthless trade towers I should point out due to them being filled with asbestos that needed removal; a process that would have produced a cost that would have rivaled the cost of the lease itself. Larry explains his reason for purchasing the towers as "I felt a compelling urge to own them." Is this a believable reason coming from a supposed successful businessman?
Larry had breakfast in "Windows on the World" restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every single morning. Larry was absent from this routine meeting on the morning of September the 11th. Larry's two offspring, who also worked in the WTC, also conveniently decided to take the day off. Either the Silverstein family is clairvoyant, or then knew exactly what was going down that day. Take your pick. Larry Silverstein scored more than $4.5 Billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of his complex. Silverstein was personal friends with key player in Zionist controlled media Rupert Murdoch, former Israeli president & infamous Zionist war criminal Ariel Sharon, as well as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein was such good friends with Benjamin Netanyahu that he would receive a phone call from him every single sunday.
2) Frank Lowy-- Lowy, a Czechoslovakia born Jew, was the owner of Westfield America, one of the biggest shopping mall conglomerates in the world. Lowy leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space. Frank Lowy has quite an interesting history. He was a member of the Golani Brigade, and fought in the Israeli war of independence. Before this he was a member of Hagganah, a Jewish terrorist organization. Frank Lowy spends three months of the year at his home in Israel and has been described by the Sydney Morning Herald as "a self-made man with a strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics." He funded and launched the Israeli Institute for National Strategy and Policy, which will "operate within the framework of Tel Aviv University" in Israel. He is also close friends with many top Israeli officials such as Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak. He was also implicated in an Israeli Bank Scandal with Olmert. Frank Lowy steered clear of the WTC on 9/11. More information about Lowy can be further researched here.
Lease Transfer Authorization
3) Lewis Eisenberg -- This Jewish criminal personality was the head of the Port Authority of New York and authorized the lease transfer to his Zionist brethren Larry and Lowy. Eisenberg was a large contributor to the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign, as well as a partner in the Jewish bank Goldman-Sachs. Eisenberg has been both a member of the Planning Board of the United Jewish Appeal/United Jewish Federation pro-Israeli government pressure group in the U.S.
WTC Privatization
4) Ronald Lauder - Billionaire Estee Lauder Cosmetics magnate. He was the chairman of NY Governor George Pataki's commission on privatization. He is the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the WTC (Source, 9th pp) -- but he also got the former Stewart Air Force Base to become privatized. Oddly, the flight paths of flight 175 and flight 11 converged directly over this airport.
Lauder is active in the following organizations: Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Jewish National Fund, World Jewish Congress, American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, Anti-Defamation League, Jewish Theological Seminary. Ronald Lauder was elected president of the World Jewish Congress on 10 June, 2007.
Lauder founded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, Israel called the Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy. He is the key Sayan involved in the preparation of 9/11.
WTC Security In Zionist Hands
The second crucial aspect of control that needed to be established in order to pull off 9/11 was to gain control of security of the WTC complex. This way, Mossad explosive experts -- that just so happened to be in town just prior to and on 9/11 -- could be readily allowed access to strategic areas of the buildings in order to prep for the demolitions.
The contract to run security at the WTC was designated to Kroll Associates after the 1993 wtc bombing. Kroll is otherwise known as a "Wallstreets CIA".
Who gave them the contract?
The Port Authority of New York paid them $2.5 million to revamp security at the complex. The owners of Kroll was two Zionist Jews named Jules & Jeremy Kroll.
The managing director of Kroll at the time was Jerome M. Hauer.
Hauer was also the guy chosen to run Mayor Rudy Guiliani's office of emergency management( OEM) from 1996 to 2000. He is the key individual that pushed for this office to be placed in Silverstein's building 7.
Jerome Hauer is also Jewish and a staunch Zionist. Hauer's mother, Rose Muscatine Hauer, is the retired Dean of the Beth Israel School of Nursing and the Honorary President of the New York Chapter of Hadassah, the Daughters of Zion movement that is one of the central Zionist organizations involved in the creation and maintenance of the State of Israel.
Pre-Knowledge of Anthrax Mailings
A hardly known fact is that Jerome Hauer is the one who advised the WhiteHouse to go on the anti-biotic effective against Anthrax -- Cipro -- a week prior to the mailings. How convenient.
How did he know?
Hauer is an 'expert' in Bio-Terrorism and was the one who was in charge of the NIH response to the anthrax attacks. His reactions to the anthrax mailings were 'very slow' to say the least, and he took every opportunity to invoke "Osama Bin Laden" in his rhetoric.
Who Killed John O'neil?
Former special agent FBI, John O'neil, who was tasked with investigating Bin Laden coincidentally enough, was Former special agent FBI, John O'neil, who was tasked with investigating Bin Laden coincidentally enough, was hired as head of security at the WTC by Jerome Hauer. Amazingly, O'neil was killed on his FIRST day of work -- 9/11.
It is important to note that O'neil had quit his job at the FBI after his investigation into the U.S.S. Cole attack in Yemen was obstructed & sabotaged by U.S ambassador to Yemen, Zionist Barbara Bodine. This is because the U.S.S. Cole was NOT done by Al Qaeda. The USS Cole was hit by an Israeli cruise missile(Source, 39th pp) to sway public opinion against Arabs (Al Qaeda), as well as demonize the democrats (didn't take terror threat seriously) -- so that their puppet George Bush Jr. could be hurled into office in time for 9/11. This was of course completely covered up.
Airport Security
The third crucial aspect of control that needed to be established was to gain control of airport security at all of the airports that the hijackings would originate from. Passenger screening needed to be handled by their operatives in order to allow certain people & certain items (i.e. weapons) onto the planes.
Who ran airport secuirty at all three ports of alleged hijackings?
That would be ICTS International / Huntsleigh USA (wholly owned subsidiary)
Owned by Ezra Harel and Menachem Atzmon. Both Israeli Jews.
It is run by "experts" in the security and intelligence field. Israeli intelligence that is. Most employees were ex- Shin Bet agents.
Is this airport security company, who ran the security at Boston's Logan Airport, as well as Newark, really that shotty to allow 19 arabs on board 4 different planes with boxcutters, mace, and even a gun, or is there something else going on here?
Menachem Atzmon, former Likud treasurer in the 80's, was involved in an Israeli political scandal involving Ehud Olmert and other Likudnits in Israel. He was cirminally convicted of fraud, falsifying documents, as well as breaching Party Funding Law.
ICTS was also in charge of airport security when the shoe bomber, Richard Reid, allegedly boarded a plane with a shoe bomb. If Reid is really a terrorist and not just an innocent man being used by the Mossad to incite more fear of terrorism, then why did ICTS let him board the plane knowing he could be dangerous?
Another point indicating ICTS's complicity is that a few hours before the Patriot Act was voted on, it was edited to make foreign companies in charge of security on 9/11 immune to lawsuits. This would prevent American courts from demanding that ICTS provide testimony or hand over the missing surveillance videos from the airports.
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (also referred to as "Underwear Bomber) is a Muslim Nigerian citizen and alleged terrorist who attempted to detonate plastic explosives hidden in his underwear on board of Northwest Airlines Flight 253, en route from Amsterdam to Detroit, Michigan, on Christmas Day December 25, 2009. Abdulmutallab boarded the US bound plane from Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam. Kurt Haskell, an attorney from Michigan, also boarded the same flight and he recalls seeing Abdulmutallab and another "sharp dressed" Indian looking man who helped Abdulmutallab board the flight. Haskell claims that Abdulmutallab boarded the flight without a passport. The security at the Schiphol Airport is also handled by the Israeli-owned company: ICTS International.
Prior Knowledge
Gomel Chesed Cemetary Incident
In October 2000, approximately 11 months before 9/11, a retired Israeli Defense Forces(IDF) officer, and veteran of the Yom Kippur War(1973), was collecting English Ivy Cuttings at the Gomel Chesed Cemetery located at Mccellan and 245 Mount Olive Avenue, which is near the city lines of Elizabeth and Newark, New Jersey. The Gomel Chesed Cemetary is a Jewish cemetary.
The man overheard a couple of people having what he believed to be a conversation spoken in Hebrew, which drew his attention. He hid behind an 8-foot tall retaining wall and listened in to their conversation as they stood below. Shortly after a Lincoln town car approached the two people -- presumably Israelis -- and the man in the backseat got out to greet them. After normal niceties were exchanged the third man said:
“The Americans will learn what it is to live with terrorists after the planes hit the twins in September.”
One of the men that had been leaning against the retaining wall expressed concerns regarding whether the upcoming presidential election (November 2000) could impact the plans. The man that arrived in the Town Car pacified the doubts by saying:
“Don’t worry, we have people in high places and no matter who gets elected, they will take care of everything.”
The observer who overheard this conversation related it to the FBI on numerous occasions only to be ignored each time. Nothing was done about it, and no investigation into the incident has ever took place.
Israeli Citizens Get Tipped Off 
Israeli instant messaging company, Odigo, admitted that two of its employees received instant messages warning of an impeding attack 2 hours prior to the first plane hitting.
This warning was not passed on to authorities, which could have saved thousands of lives.
Odigo has a feature on its service that allows the passing on of messages through a search feature based on nationality, such as Israeli. Knowing these two particular Israelis were forewanred, it is very likely they passed the message on to other Israelis considering that out of the 4000 Israelis believed to be in and around the WTC and the Pentagon only FIVE died. 5/4000 Israelis.
Mathematically (if Israelis were not forewarned) about 10% (400/4000) would have died; even as low as 200-300/4000 would not really indicate foreknowledge. Yet only FIVE Israelis died and two of the five were actually aboard the supposedly hijacked flights; therefore only three Israelis died at the WTC on 9/11. An astonishing feat. We're talking about 'Israelis' here, not 'American Jews'. Many Jews died in the wtc on 9/11.
Odigo has offices in New York, and in Herzliya, Israel. Herzliya happens to be the Head Quarters of Mossad.
Do the math.
Odigo was later bought up by another Israeli company called Comverse. The CEO of Comverse was Kobi Alexander, "dual" Israeli-US citizen, with connections to Mossad. He has been charged on several counts of fraud.
Goldman Sachs Forewarned
– On Sep 10, 2001, the Tokyo branch of Goldman Sachs warned its American employees to steer clear of American buildings.
Israeli ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Forewarned
- ZIM, an Israeli company, vacated its office(10,000 square feet) in the North WTC tower a week before 9/11, breaking its lease. 49% of this company is owned by the Israeli government. The lease ran till the end of 2001, and the company lost $50,000 by breaking the lease. Later, FBI agent Michael Dick, [url=http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=3655=who was investigating Israeli spying before and after 9/11[/url] and looking into the suspicious move, was removed from his duties by the head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, Michael Chertoff.
According to a non-official cover or N.O.C. CIA source who worked closely with Dick, the Israeli movers moved in explosives when ZIM moved out.
With ZIM Israel bailing out just in time, this left one Israeli company, Clearforest, with 19 employees, in the WTC on 9/11. Of the five employees in the building all managed to escape.
Mossad Is Guilty
U.S. Army Study: On Mossad
An elite U.S. Army study center had devised a plan for enforcing a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require about 20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly created Palestinian state.
The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first year of a peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for U.S. troops from both sides.
Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say:
"Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
The amazing thing about this is that this story was reported in the Washington Post on September 10, 2001.
Israeli espionage around 9/11
– Shortly before 9/11, over 140 Israelis had been arrested for suspected espionage. Some of them were posing as Art students. These suspects targeted or penetrated Military bases, DEA, FBI, Secret Service, ATF, U.S. Customs, IRS, INS, EPA, Interior Dept., U.S. Marshal’s Service, various U.S. Attorneys Offices, Secret government offices Unlisted private homes of law enforcement/intelligence officers. Most of the suspects served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept and or explosive ordinance units.
Dozens of Israelis were arrested in American malls kiosks selling toys, acting as a front for a spying operation.
60 detained suspects worked for the Israeli company AMDOCS which provides most directory assistance calls and almost call records and billings services for the U.S. by virtue of its contracts with the 25 largest telephone companies in the U.S.
All alleged 9/11 hijackers had fake IDs. During a joint FBI-CIA operation against the lead patsy hijacker Mohammad Atta in Fort Lee, NJ in 2001, the operation was photographed by Israeli agents and thereby compromised. These Jews were providing cover for the future patsy hijacker teams.
ISRAEL SPIES ON THE USA PART 1
ISRAELI SPYING PART 2
ISRAELI SPYING PART 3
ISRAELI SPYING PART 4 OF 4
Israel did 9/11 CHAPTER 2
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1043232/
Israel did 9/11 CHAPTER 3
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/1043236/
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 18.4.2016 kl. 04:10 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
31.3.2010 | 13:46
Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet, says John P. Holdren Obama´s science Car.
http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=576
Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population
 |
 |
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.
The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?
These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar.
In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.
No one in their right mind would say such things.
Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.
[UPDATE: Make sure to read the new statements issued by the White House and by John Holdren's office in response to the controversy raised by this essay -- you can see them below following the Ecoscience excerpts, or you can jump directly to the statements by clicking here.]
This report was originally inspired by this article in FrontPage magazine, which covers some of the same information given here. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. Why not? Because, as I discovered when discussing the article with various friends, there was no proof that the quotes were accurate -- so most folks (even those opposed to Obama's policies) doubted their veracity, because the statements seemed too inflammatory to be true. In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence.
Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time (late 1970s) was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: overpopulation. He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem. Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: personally, I don't think it's a valid excuse at all, since the crisis he was in a panic over was mostly in his imagination. Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible.
Direct quotes from John Holdren's Ecoscience
Below you will find a series of ten short passages from Ecoscience. On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me.
Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context.
And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans (and photos) of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context."
Ready? Brace yourself. And prepare to be shocked.
Page 837:
Compulsory abortions would be legal
| Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. |
As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded." Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that's whom. What Holdren's really saying here is, "I have determined that there's nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies."
And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there's no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for "compulsory population-control laws." In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that "the population crisis" has already become "sufficiently severe to endanger the society."
Page 786:
Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions
| One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society. |
Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what's especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals -- wrenching babies from their mothers' arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not -- but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don't be fooled by the innocuous and "level-headed" tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed.
Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.
This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I'm reminded of the phrase "banality of evil."
Not that it matters, but I myself am "pro-choice" -- i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn't mean I'm pro-abortion -- I don't particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. One doesn't need to be a "pro-life" activist to see the horror of this proposal -- people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic.
There's a bumper sticker that's popular in liberal areas which says: "Against abortion? Then don't have one." Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you're against it or not.
Page 787-8:
Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock
| Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. |
OK, John, now you're really starting to scare me.
Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that'd be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government.
Page 786-7:
The government could control women's reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control
| Involuntary fertility control A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. |
Note well the phrase "with official permission" in the above quote. Johh Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don't.
Page 838:
The kind of people who cause "social deterioration" can be compelled to not have children
| If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection. |
To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book -- and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone -- but those who "contribute to social deterioration" could be "forced to exercise reproductive responsibility" which could only mean one thing -- compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to "force" people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people's bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No -- the only way to "force" people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions.
But what manner of insanity is this? "Social deterioration"? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that "some" people contribute to social deterioriation more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn't that eugenics, plain and simple?
And isn't eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice?
We've already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was "feeble-minded" and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity.
The italicized phrase at the end ("providing they are not denied equal protection"), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn't be racially based or discriminatory -- merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren's America determines that you are "contributing to social deterioration" by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people.
No no, you say, Holdren isn't claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he's stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more.
If so -- how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or -- most disturbingly of all -- perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book.
Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn't looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don't you just get your tubes tied already? But it's a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it's not so funny anymore.
Page 838:
Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size
| In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? |
Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?
Why?
I'll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual's body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime?
I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holgren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures.
Page 942-3:
A "Planetary Regime" should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born
| Toward a Planetary Regime Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, andincluding all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits. |
In case you were wondering exactly who would enforce these forced abortion and mass sterilization laws: Why, it'll be the "Planetary Regime"! Of course! I should have seen that one coming.
The rest of this passage speaks for itself. Once you add up all the things the Planetary Regime (which has a nice science-fiction ring to it, doesn't it?) will control, it becomes quite clear that it will have total power over the global economy, since according to Holdren this Planetary Regime will control "all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable" (which basically means all goods) as well as all food, and commerce on the oceans and any rivers "that discharge into the oceans" (i.e. 99% of all navigable rivers). What's left? Not much.
Page 917:
We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force
| If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involvespartial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. |
The other shoe drops. So: We are expected to voluntarily surrender national sovereignty to an international organization (the "Planetary Regime," presumably), which will be armed and have the ability to act as a police force. And we saw in the previous quote exactly which rules this armed international police force will be enforcing: compulsory birth control, and all economic activity.
It would be laughable if Holdren weren't so deadly serious. Do you want this man to be in charge of science and technology in the United States? Because he already is in charge.
Page 749:
Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism
| Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the "tragedy of the commons," wherein the "commons" is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint. |
This passage is not particularly noteworthy except for the inclusion of the odd phrase "pronatalist attitude," which Holdren spends much of the book trying to undermine. And what exactly is a "pronatalist attitude"? Basically it means the urge to have children, and to like babies. If only we could suppress people's natural urge to want children and start families, we could solve all our problems!
What's disturbing to me is the incredibly patronizing and culturally imperialist attitude he displays here, basically acting like he has the right to tell every ethnic group in the world that they should allow themselves to go extinct or at least not increase their populations any more. How would we feel if Andaman Islanders showed up on the steps of the Capitol in Washington D.C. and announced that there were simply too many Americans, and we therefore are commanded to stop breeding immediately? One imagines that the attitude of every ethnic group in the world to John Holdren's proposal would be: Cram it, John. Stop telling us what to do.
Page 944
As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000
| Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny.Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world. |
This is the final paragraph of the book, which I include here only to show how embarrassingly inaccurate his "scientific" projections were. In 1977, Holdren thought we were teetering on the brink of global catastrophe, and he proposed implementing fascistic rules and laws to stave off the impending disaster. Luckily, we ignored his warnings, yet the world managed to survive anyway without the need to punish ourselves with the oppressive society which Holdren proposed. Yes, there still is overpopulation, but the problems it causes are not as morally repugnant as the "solutions" which John Holdren wanted us to adopt.
I actually don't disagree with everything Holdren says. I agree with him that overpopulation is a problem, and that much of the environmental degradation that has happened is due in large part to overpopulation (mostly in the developing world). Where we disagree is in the solution. While Holdren does occasionally advocate for milder solutions elsewhere in the book, his basic premise is that the population explosion has gotten so out of control that only the most oppressive and totalitarian measures can possibly stop humanity from stripping the planet bare and causing a catastrophe beyond our imagining. Holdren has (apparently) no problem saying we should force people to not have children, by any means necessary. And that is where we part ways. I draw the line at even the hint of compulsory compliance to draconian laws about pregnancy and abortion; Holdren does not hesitate to cross that line without a second thought.
My solution would be to adopt social policies that are known to lead to voluntary and non-coercive trends toward a lower birth rate: increased education for girls in poor countries, better access to (voluntarily adopted) birth control, higher standards of living. In fact, population trends since 1977 have started to level off in the crisis areas of Asia and Latin America, primarily due to better standards of living and better education, which are known to decrease population growth. These non-oppressive policies appear to be sufficient to control the population -- and Holdren's decades-long panic attack seems to be unfounded.
Now, consider all the recommendations by Holdren given above, and then note that at his Senate confirmation hearing he said he would "keep policy free from politics" if confirmed. In fact Holdren has repeatedly said that science should not be be tainted by politics, telling the BBC just a few days ago that "he wanted to take the politics out of scientific advice." But have you ever seen more politicized science-policy recommendations than those given in Ecoscience?
For the doubters and the naysayers...
There are five possible counter-claims which you might make against this report:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax.
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context.
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them.
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable.
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now.
I'll address each in turn:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax.
Scroll to the bottom of this page, and look at the photos of the book -- especially the last two photos, showing the book opened to pages quoted in this report. Then look at the full-page scans directly above those photos, showing each page mentioned here in full, unaltered. What more proof do you need? If you're still not convinced, go to any large library and check out the book yourself, and you'll see: everything I claim here is true.
If you don't have the patience to go to a library, you can always view the actual contents of the book online for free for a brief trial period.
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context.
Some have argued that the FrontPage article "takes quotes out of context," which is the very reason why I went and investigated the original book itself. Turns out that not only are the quotes not out of context, but the additional paragraphs on either side of each passage only serve to make Holdren's ideas appear even more sinister. You want context? Be careful what you ask for, because the context makes things worse.
But yes, to satisfy the curious and the doubters, the "extended passages" and full-page scans given below provide more than sufficient context for the quotes.
In truth, I weary of the "context game" in which every controversial statement is always claimed to be "out of context," and no matter how much context is then given, it's never enough, until one must present every single word someone has ever written -- at which point the reader becomes overwhelmed and loses interest. Which is the whole point of the context game to begin with.
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them.
First of all: If you are a co-author of a book, you are signing your name to it, and you must take responsibility for everything that is in that book. This is true for John Holdren and every other author.
But there's plenty more evidence than that. Most significantly, Holdren has held similar views for years and frequently wrote about them under his own name. It's not like these quotes are unexpected and came out of the blue -- they fit into a pattern of other Holdren writings and viewpoints.
Lastly, below I present full-page scans of the "Acknowledgments" pages in Ecoscience, and in those Acknowledgments pages are dozens of thank-yous to people at U.C. Berkeley -- where Holdren was a professor at the time. In fact, there are more acknowledgments involving Berkeley than anywhere else, and since Holdren was the only one of the three authors with a connection to Berkeley, they must be histhank-yous -- indicating that he wrote a substantial portion of the book. Even his wife is thanked.
I have no way of knowing if Holdren himself typed the exact words quoted on this page, but he certainly at a minimum edited them and gave them his stamp of approval.
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable.
Well, if you believe that, then I guess this page holds no interest for you, and you are thereby free to ignore it. But I have a suspicion that the vast majority of Americans find the views expressed by Holdren to be alarming and abhorrent.
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now.
You might argue that this book was written in a different era, during which time a certain clique of radical scientists (including Holdren) were in a frenzy over what they thought was a crisis so severe it threatened the whole planet: overpopulation. But, you could say, all that is in the past, an embarrassing episode which Holdren might wish everyone would now forget. I mean, people change their opinions all the time. Senator Robert Byrd was once in the KKK, after all, but by now he has renounced those views. Perhaps in a similar vein John Holdren no longer believes any of the things he wrote in Ecoscience, so we can't hold them against him any more.
The White House gets involved:
Recent statements byHoldren and the Ehrlichs in response
to this controversy
When I originally wrote and published this essay on July 10, I said:
"Unfortunately, as far as I've been able to discover, Holdren has never disavowed the views he held in the 1970s and spelled out in Ecoscience and other books."
However, that is no longer entirely true. On July 15, both the White House and John Holdren's office issued statements on this controversy after prodding from reporters at both the Washington Times and the Catholic News Agency.
According to this article by Amanda Carpenter in the Washington Times, Holdren and his co-authors have now distanced themselves from the words published in Ecoscience 32 years ago. From the article:
When asked whether Mr. Holdren's thoughts on population control have changed over the years, his staff gave The Washington Times a statement that said, "This material is from a three-decade-old, three-author college textbook. Dr. Holdren addressed this issue during his confirmation when he said he does not believe that determining optimal population is a proper role of government. Dr. Holdren is not and never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization."
...
The White House also passed along a statement from the Ehrlichs that said, in part, "anybody who actually wants to know what we and/or Professor Holdren believe and recommend about these matters would presumably read some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times, rather than going back a third of a century to find some formulations in an encyclopedic textbook where description can be misrepresented as endorsement."
(The second quote above is from page 2 of the article.)
The Catholic News Agency also reported on July 15,
In Tuesday e-mails to CNA, Rick Weiss, the Office of Science and Technology Policy's Director of Strategic Communications, said the material at issue was from "a three-decade-old, three-author textbook used in colleges to teach energy policy."
He could "easily dismiss" fears that Dr. Holdren favors government control over population growth.
"He made that quite clear in his confirmation hearing," Weiss said.
He then quoted a section of the confirmation transcript in which Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) asked Holdren whether he thinks "determining optimal population is a proper role of government."
"No, Senator, I do not," was Holdren's reply, according to Weiss and a transcript of the proceedings.
In other remarks at the confirmation hearing, not cited by Weiss, Holdren told Sen. Vitter he no longer thinks it is "productive" to focus on the "optimum population" for the United States. "I don't think any of us know what the right answer is."
According to Weiss, Holdren "made clear that he did not believe in coercive means of population control" and is not an advocate for measures expressed in the book "and they are certainly not endorsed by this administration in any way."
Weiss also provided CNA with a statement from the book's other two authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich.
The Ehrlichs said they had been "shocked" at what they called the "serious misrepresentation" of their and Holdren's views.
"We were not then, never have been, and are not now 'advocates' of the Draconian measures for population limitation described -- but not recommended -- in the book's 60-plus small-type pages cataloging the full spectrum of population policies that, at the time, had either been tried in some country or analyzed by some commentator."
Describing "Ecoscience" as a "textbook," they said its descriptions can be "misrepresented as endorsement."
In my original report, I challenged Holdren "to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience."
I ask my readers: Do you think these two articles count as the renunciation and disavowal I requested?
I'm not so sure. First of all, the disavowals were made by a spokesman and by his co-authors -- as of this writing, Holdren himself has never renounced and disavowed the contents of Ecoscience. Unless you want to count the one-sentence answer he gave during the confirmation hearing.
Under questioning from Senator David Vitter, Holdren did backpedal a bit concerning a different statement he made in the '70s about government-controlled population levels. Does this single sentence count as an across-the-board disavowal of every single specific recommendation he made in Ecoscience as well as in many other books and articles? My opinion is Not really, but as usual I'll provide the full evidence and the full context and I'll let you decide for yourself.
You can view the video of the confirmation hearings here (introductory page here), but be warned that it is an extremely long streaming video that doesn't work in all browsers, and the answer in question doesn't come until the 120th minute.
Because most people won't or can't view the entire video, here's a transcript of the relevant part, and you can decide for yourself whether his statement counts as a disavowal of his quotes cited in this report:
[Starting at 120:30]
Senator David Vitter: In 1973, you encouraged "a decline in fertility well below replacement" in the United States because "280 million in 2040 is likely to be too many." What would your number for the right population in the US be today?
John Holdren: I no longer think it's productive, Senator, to focus on the optimum population of the United States. I don't think any of us know what the right answer is. When I wrote those lines in 1973, uh, I was preoccupied with the fact that many problems the United States faced appeared to be being made more difficult by the greater population growth that then prevailed. I think everyone who studies these matters understands that population growth brings some benefits and some liabilities; it's a tough question to determine which will prevail in a given time period.
Vitter then asked, "You think determining optimal population is a proper role of government?" To which Holdren replied, "No, Senator, I do not."
(If you want the full context of this exchange between Vitter and Holdren, a complete transcript of their entire question-and-answer session can be found posted here.)
I'm not sure just how seriously we should take a statement made by someone during what is essentially a job interview. A few words spent reassuring the interviewer that you don't really believe all those things you spent thirty years elaborating in detail -- what else should we expect? That Holdren would say, Yes, I think the government should lower the U.S. population down to 280 million? Of course he wouldn't say that during the interview, despite what he may or may not really believe internally.
But let's spend a moment looking at these answers more closely. Both of them referred to determining a specific number of people that should be allowed as the population of the United States. First he said it was "no longer productive" to set a hard-and-fast exact number for the population of the U.S., and then said he doesn't think we should "determine the optimal population." But that still leaves the door open for the notion that the population should be lowered by whatever means in general without a specific numerical goal in mind. Holdren still did not say that he's against population control as a concept -- only that he thinks we shouldn't set specific numeric targets.
And more importantly in the context of this essay, he did not disavow any of the specific proposals quoted here -- forced abortion, "Planetary Regime," etc.
Rather than a fairly vague blanket disavowal given in response to a question on a slightly different topic during the confirmation hearings, and rather than a statement given by someone in his office, and rather than a statement issued by his co-authors, I still would like to see a specific disavowal by Holdren himself. And so I repeat,
I challenge John Holdren himself to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and specific recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience; and until he does so, I will hold him responsible for those statements.
Columnist David Harsanyi, who received a similar semi-disavowal from Holdren's office, dismantles it quite effectively in an excellent piece he published on July 15 in the Denver Post, Reason Online and elsewhere.
And who wants to take up the challenge from the Ehrlichs issued by the White House to look into "some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times" to uncover "what we and/or Professor Holdren believe"? Seems like territory ripe for exploration. Post any research you uncover either here in the comments section at zomblog, or on your own blog. Anything that John Holdren or the Ehrlichs have written since 1977 is fair game -- according to the Ehrlichs themselves.
Before you read any further...
If you accept the self-evident veracity of these quotations, and are outraged enough already, then you can stop reading here. Very little new information is presented below.
(And if you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.)
But if you still harbor doubts that the United States Science Czar could possibly harbor such views, and want more proof, then read on for longer and fuller citations, and full-page scans of the pages in the book, as well as photographs of the book itself. And if by chance you are a Holdren or Obama supporter, and want to falsely claim that I have taken Holdren's statements out of context, then you'd better stop reading here too, because if you go any further then you'll see that I have given full context for the quotes and conclusive evidence that they're Holdren's -- removing any basis by which you could have questioned this report.
More Context: Complete extended passages from which the quotes above were taken
For most of these, I will present the following extended passages without further commentary -- judge for yourself if you think the context mitigates Holdren's intent, or only worsens the impression that he's completely serious about all this.
Page 837 full-length extended quote:
| To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however. |
Let it be noted that John Holdren himself is among the few who "consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion" -- in fact, that's the entire thrust of Ecoscience, to convince everyone that overpopulation is a catastrophic crisis which requires immediate and extreme solutions. So although the final sentence of the extended passage seems at first to mollify the extreme nature of his speculation, in reality Holdren is only speaking of all the unaware masses who don't see things his way.
Page 786 full-length extended quote:
| Social pressures on both men and women to marry and have children must be removed. As former Secretary of Interior Stewart Udall observed, "All lives are not enhanced by marital union; parenthood is not necessarily a fulfillment for every married couple." If society were convinced of the need for low birth rates, no doubt the stigma that has customarily been assigned to bachelors, spinsters, and childless couples would soon disappear. But alternative lifestyles should be open to single people, and perhaps the institution of an informal, easily dissolved "marriage" for the childless is one possibility. Indeed, many DC societies now seem to be evolving in this direction as women's liberation gains momentum. It is possible that fully developed societies may produce such arrangements naturally, and their association with lower fertility is becoming increasingly clear. In LDCs a childless or single lifestyle might be encouraged deliberately as the status of women approaches parity with that of men. Although free and easy association of the sexes might be tolerated in such a society, responsible parenthood ought to be encouraged and illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged. One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even he possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society. Somewhat more repressive measures for discouraging large families have also been proposed, such as assigning public housing without regard for family size and removing dependency allowances from student grants or military pay. Some of these have been implemented in crowded Singapore, whose population program has been counted as one of the most successful. |
In the final sentence of this passage, Holdren speaks approvingly of Singapore's infamous totalitarian micromanaging of people's daily lives.
But to me, the most bizarre and disturbing aspect of the quote given here is that Holgren seems to think that economic disincentives to have large families are more repressive and extreme than taking away basic bodily rights. To Holdren, "removing dependency allowances from student grants" is more repressive than compelling women to have abortions against their will. A very peculiar and twisted view of the world, I must say.
Page 787-8 full-length extended quote:
| Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. Physiologist Melvin Ketchel, of the Tufts University School of Medicine, suggested that a sterilant could be developed that had a very specific action—for example, preventing implantation of the fertilized ovum. He proposed that it be used to reduce fertility levels by adjustable amounts, anywhere from five to 75 percent, rather than to sterilize the whole population completely. In this way, fertility could be adjusted from time to time to meet a society's changing needs, and there would be no need to provide an antidote. Contraceptives would still be needed for couples who were highly motivated to have small families. Subfertile and functionally sterile couples who strongly desired children would be medically assisted, as they are now, or encouraged to adopt. Again, there is no sign of such an agent on the horizon. And the risk of serious, unforeseen side effects would, in our opinion, militate against the use of any such agent, even though this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children. Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great). Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries. |
Page 786-7 full-length extended quote:
| Involuntary fertility control The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birthrates are rapidly reversed by other means. Some involuntary measures could be less repressive or discriminatory, in fact, than some of the socioeconomic measure suggested. ... A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. This of course would be feasible only in countries where the majority of births are medically assisted. Unfortunately, such a program therefore is not practical for most less developed countries (although in China, mothers of three children are commonly "expected" to undergo sterilization). The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. No capsule that would last that long (30 years or more) has yet been developed, but it is technically within the realm of possibility. |
Page 838 full-length extended quote:
| It is accepted that the law has as its proper function the protection of each person and each group of people. A legal restriction on the right to have more than a given number of children could easily be based on the needs of the first children. Studies have indicated that the larger the family, the less healthy the children are likely to be and the less likely they are to realize their potential levels of achievement. Certainly there is no question that children of a small family can be cared for better and can be educated better than children of a large family, income and other things being equal. The law could properly say to a mother that, in order to protect the children she already has, she could have no more. (Presumably, regulations on the sizes of adopted families would have to be the same.) A legal restriction on the right to have children could also be based on the right not to be disadvantaged by excessive numbers of children produced by others. Differing rates of reproduction among groups can give rise to serious social problems. For example, differential rates of reproduction between ethnic, racial, religious, or economic groups might result in increased competition for resources and political power and thereby undermine social order. If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection. |
Study this whole extended passage carefully for an extremely unsettling view into the legal brain of John Holdren. Some of the sentiments he expresses here are beyond the pale, and his legal reasoning boggles the mind.
Page 838 full-length extended quote:
| Individual rights. Individual rights must be balanced against the power of the government to control human reproduction. Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right. Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce. Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the "right responsibly to choose" the number and spacing of children (our emphasis). In the United States, individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and it has been held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether or not to have children, at least to the extent that a woman has a right to choose not to have children. But the right is not unlimited. Where the society has a "compelling, subordinating interest" in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could he required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted. It is often argued that the right to have children is so personal that the government should not regulate it. In an ideal society, no doubt the state should leave family size and composition solely to the desires of the parents. In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? |
This extended passage is a perfect example of how the "full context" of a short quote only makes it worse; once you see Holdren's complete elaboration on the idea, you realize it's not some flippant notion he tossed off, but something he feels deeply about.
Page 942-3 full-length extended quote:
| Toward a Planetary Regime ... Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea an other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions. The Planetary Regime might have the advantage over earlier proposed world government schemes in not being primarily political in its emphasis—even though politics would inevitably be a part of all discussions, implicitly or explicitly. Since most of the areas the Regime would control are not now being regulated or controlled by nations or anyone else, establishment of the Regime would involve far less surrendering of national power. Nevertheless it might function powerfully to suppress international conflict simply because the interrelated global resource-environment structure would not permit such an outdated luxury. |
Page 917 full-length extended quote:
| If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible. |
Full Context: High-res scans of all pages cited in this report
Click on each of the images below to see the full-size scans of the pages mentioned in this report:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Photographs of Ecoscience, inside and out
Any finally, for the final proof that this is a real book co-authored by John Holdren --
and that these are real quotes from that book -- and not some elaborate hoax, here are some photographs (as opposed to scans) of the book itself: 
If you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 21.5.2017 kl. 10:19 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (1)
4.3.2010 | 17:18
The Murderous Mossad and 9-11
http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/terror/192915-the-murderous-mossad-and-9-11
The Israeli Mossad murder of a commander of the military wing of the Hamas (the democratically elected government of Palestine) is just one more provocation by the right-wing Zionist extremist government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli provocations on the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem are designed to foment a conflict in which the Israelis will escalate the violence.
This is an extremely dangerous and illegal strategy which the United States and world should use every effort to arrest and prevent.
Newspapers from the region are in agreement that Israel is acting to escalate the conflict and foment a war in the region:
Israel's plan to swallow Palestine has reached a peak... its project is to wipe Palestine from the map... an escalation rather than a settlement is looming in the region.
– Al-Vefagh editorial (Iran)
The fresh Israeli aggression against the sanctity of the al-Aqsa mosque, and the attacks on worshippers by the Israeli security apparatus, represent the latest in a series of Israeli escalations over the past few weeks... they show that [Israel] is determined to escalate and even expand the conflict.
– Al-Quds editorial (Palestine)
The US silence shows that ongoing attempts to resume negotiations have stalled and that those might have to wait until after a new Palestinian intifadah or even war.
– Talal Akwal in Al-Ayyam (Palestine)
MOSSAD MADNESS
The Mossad has been at it again: The recent assassination of a Hamas military leader in Dubai looks conclusively like the Israelis' handiwork. No doubt, they hoped for a little more anonymity in the aftermath--they likely didn't expect the Dubai authorities to be quite so technologically competent...Either we are complicit or we are not--there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations.
- Melik Kaylan, "Mossad Madness", Forbes, February 26, 2010
Dubai's Police Chief Lt. Gen. Dhahi Khalfan Tamim identifies eleven of the 27 known suspects wanted in connection with the killing of a Hamas commander, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in a Dubai hotel room.
Tamim has called on Mossad Chief Meir Dagan to own up to his crime or deny Mossad's involvement in the murder.
The Dubai police have provided details about the stolen identities of the Mossad murderers and their arrival and departure routes. Some of the killers came from and returned to Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy, and the United States.
Will the United States, Switzerland, Germany, and the other nations involved investigate and pursue the Israeli killers that use their nations as bases?
As Melik Kaylan says, "there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations."
A list of 26 Israeli Mossad agents wanted for the murder in Dubai - At least two of the suspects sought by Dubai police for the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh reportedly entered the U.S. shortly after the crime.
One of the Israeli suspects entered the U.S. on February 14, carrying a British passport, while the other, with an Irish passport, entered the U.S. on January 21. Mabhouh's body was found in a Dubai hotel room on January 20.
Will the Department of Homeland Security track down the Israeli killers in the United States?
There are lessons to be learned from the murder of a Hamas leader in Dubai. The information provided about the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh by the authorities of Dubai has shown the world that their police force is technologically competent and professional.
The detailed information provided by the police of Dubai about the suspects involved in the al-Mabouh murder is the result of a police investigation using normal procedures, yet it is far superior to any of the information provided by the FBI about the 19 alleged terrorist hijackers of 9-11, who have been blamed for killing some 3,000 Americans.
Are the police of Dubai that much more competent and professional than the FBI or is there another reason why U.S. law enforcement seems so incompetent when dealing with Israeli crimes?
The murder of al-Mabouh is, like the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11, evidently a crime committed by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad. In both cases there is clear evidence of Israeli involvement. In the Dubai murder case the authorities have come forward with detailed information and begun an international effort to identify and locate the suspects.
In the "non-investigation" of 9-11, on the other hand, headed by Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed while key terrorism suspects like Dominic Suter and Kobi Alexander were allowed to flee to Israel and were not pursued.
Michael Chertoff, son of an Israeli Mossad agent, oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 in which prime suspects were allowed to flee to Israel and crucial evidence was confiscated and destoyed.
The response by law enforcement authorities in the two cases could hardly be more different. Unlike the police of Dubai, when pursuing Israeli criminals the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI are dogs that won't bark - or hunt. Why is that?
ISRAEL IN AMERICA
To understand why American Jews are willing to commit and cover-up serious crimes, even treason, on behalf of the state of Israel one needs to understand that most religious Jews in America are first obliged to serve Israel - a foreign state. American Jews are, for this reason, conflicted. Their religion obliges them to make "aliya" and live in Israel but most would prefer to stay in the United States.
Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have chosen to leave "the Jewish state" and now live in the United States.
While they are unwilling to leave the comfort of the United States and immigrate to Israel (aliya), most religious Jews in the United States feel strongly compelled to support and defend the state of Israel.
To fulfill their obligation to the state of Israel, Zionist Jews in America have created hundreds of organizations to raise funds and support for the Zionist state in Palestine. These organizations are consolidated under an umbrella organization called the Jewish Agency.
The Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization are two parts of the same Zionist enterprise that operates in the United States and around the world.
The Jewish Agency was the Zionist organization that became the state of Israel in 1948 when a Jewish state was established in Palestine.
The Jewish Agency, then headed by David Ben Gurion, literally became the apparatus of the Zionist state and Ben Gurion became the first prime minister of Israel.
The Jewish Agency, headquartered in New York City after World War II, organized and funded the Haganah, the Zionist militia in Palestine, as well as the terrorist groups known as the Irgun and LEHI (the Stern Gang). Using these groups, the Jewish Agency created the Mossad LeAliyah Bet (the Agency for Illegal Immigration) in 1938 to smuggle illegal Jewish immigrants and weapons into Palestine. The Jewish Agency and the Mossad worked together to bring many thousands of Jews to Palestine - illegally - from Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, and Europe.
The Jewish Agency was the Mossad.
The Jewish Agency and the Mossad continued to work together after the creation of the state of Israel to bring Jews to the Zionist state. The hard-line Zionists who run Israel today are actually fighting a losing battle with demographics. The Arab population around them is growing quickly while many Israelis are leaving the Jewish state.
The Israeli population has become more Russian, more extremist, and less Western in its outlook than at any time since the founding of the state in 1948. Ariel Sharon, the now comatose prime minister who ran Israel in 2001, dreamed of bringing one million Jews to Israel from the United States. In this effort he worked closely with the Jewish Agency.
The current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is a dangerous extremist who said 9-11 was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations on the very day of the attacks. Netanyahu has openly advocated mass expulsions of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. During a 1989 lecture at Bar Ilan University, he said: "Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions of the Arabs of the territories." Later, he stated, "I still believe that there are opportunities to expel many people."
FEINBERG AND THE JEWISH AGENCY
Kenneth Feinberg was the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund.
He alone was responsible for distributing some $7 billion of taxpayer money to the families of the victims of 9-11. In this he was supported by some 30 lawyers from his law firm and his wife, Diane "Dede" Shaff Feinberg. Diane is also an executive member of the United Israel Appeal and the Jewish Federation of Washington. She also happens to be a member of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency - the parent organization of the Mossad.
Diane Shaff Feinberg, Governor of the Jewish Agency
The non-investigation of 9-11 was controlled by Michael Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent and an orthodox rabbi. Chertoff oversaw the destruction of the thousands of tons of steel from the World Trade Center - crucial evidence that was shipped to Asian smelters and melted down. While Chertoff destroyed the evidence of 9-11, government appointed doctors prescribed Prozac for the grieving relatives and Kenneth Feinberg began his war of attrition on the 9-11 families.
As the sole person responsible for distributing the money from the Victims Compensation Fund, Feinberg paid out nearly $7 billion to families in compensation - if they would sign the agreement not to sue the airlines or the Israeli airport security firm involved in 9-11 (Huntleigh USA/ICTS).
More than 98 percent of the families accepted the money from the Feinberg-managed fund. The amounts of the payments and the amounts paid to Diane Feinberg and the 30 lawyers are not known.
The American people deserve to know how the funds were used and who got paid.
Diane and Kenneth Feinberg were co-chairmen of the recent General Assembly of the Jewish Federation, which hosted Israeli leaders involved in terrorism.
Feinberg's actions were crucial to removing more than 98 percent of the families from the litigation process. Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein have waged a war of attrition against the 9-11 relatives.
Of the thousands of families that could have used the courts to find justice and legal discovery for what happened on 9-11, Feinberg was successful in removing 98 percent. Of the 96 families that chose to go to court, all but one or two cases have settled out of court after enduring years of obstruction in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein.
Thanks to Feinberg and Hellerstein there may never be a trial for a single victim of 9-11.
Alvin K. Hellerstein has obstructed justice for the 9-11 families who chose to use the courts rather
than take the fund - or the Prozac.
Kenneth Feinberg is known for wearing expensive Brioni suits, smoking Cuban cigars, and driving his black Jaguar to his home in Bethesda, Maryland, where he has avoided paying taxes thanks to a few legal loopholes he knows about.
Kenneth Feinberg was the co-chair (along with his wife) of a recent Zionist event in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, two prime suspects in the Israeli terrorism of 9-11, participated. Feinberg's role in covering up the truth about 9-11 is connected to his relationship to the state of Israel. Kenneth Feinberg wasn't working pro bono on the 9-11 victims fund out of compassion for the victims of 9-11, or for America. He was doing it to serve Israel and the murderous Mossad.
Sources and Recommended Reading:
“Middle Eastern anger at Israeli escalations”, BBC News, March 1, 2010
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543120.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543120.stm
“Benjamin Netanyahu”, Institute for Middle East Understanding, September 29, 2008
http://imeu.net/news/article0014362.shtml
http://imeu.net/news/article0014362.shtml
Cummins, Chip, "Two Dubai Suspects Traveled to U.S." Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704089904575093881279902928.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular#articleTabs%3Darticle
Feinberg, Diane and Kenneth, The Leadership of the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, Washington D.C., November 8-10, 2009
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/press_photos.html
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/
Ford, Henry, "The Jewish Question in Current Testimony" (The International Jew), Dearborn Independent, August 27, 1921
http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/Ford/original/ij75.html
Gibbon, Edward, "The Conduct of the Roman Government towards the Christians from the Reign of Nero to that of Constantine", The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Strahan & Cadell, London, 1776
Kaylan, Melik, "Mossad Madness", Forbes.com, February 26, 2010
http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/25/mossad-israel-dubai-attack-opinions-columnists-melik-kaylan.html
Nahmias, Roee, "Dubai police to Mossad chief: Confess to Mabhouh murder or issue denial", Ynet News.com, February 27, 2010
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3855160,00.html
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 26.5.2016 kl. 03:33 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
12.1.2010 | 14:01
KARLMENN! FORÐIST PSA BLÖÐRUHÁLSKIRTILS KRABBAMEINS SKIMUN
Men: Avoid Prostate-Cancer PSA Screening
by John McDougall, MD
byJon McDougall, MD
Recently by John McDougall, MD:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/mcdougall2.1.1.html
SJÚKDÓMSVÆÐING...
“...er sala sjúkdóma, það sem að breikkar landamæri sjúkdóma og stækkar markaðinn fyrir þá sem selja og dreifa meðferðar úrræðum.
Það eru skýr dæmi um að flestar sjúkdóms – vakningar herferðir sem styrktar eru beint af lyfjaiðnaðinum- eru meira ætlaðar til þessselja lyf, en ekki að upplýsa og fræða, sem miðar að því að koma í veg fyrirsjúkdóma eða viðhalda heilbrigði.
Sjúkdómsvæðing gerir heilbrigt fólk að sjúklingum, sóar dýrmætum auðlindum, og „læknining“ orsakar skaða. ”
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191
Ray Moynihan
Science writer for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Medical Journal
http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/aug/king.htm
Á föstudeginum 21 Ágúst 2009, þá breytti sjónvarpsþátturinn þúsundum annars heilbrigðra karlmanna í sjúklinga, og olli þeim óbætanlegum skaða, þegar gestir sjónvarpsþáttarins John McEnroe, Michael Milken, og Christopher Rose mæltu með því að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu aðfara í PSA rannsókn, í þeim tilgangi að finna blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.
( Þennan þátt er líka hægt að finna frían á iTunes sem podcast og sem transcript.) https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lkl/date/2009-08-21/segment/01
Ég (John McDougall, MD ) þekki Larry King persónulega.
Ég var gestur á hans alþjóðlega útvarpsþætti 3 sinnum í fjarlægri fortíð. Hann er heiðarlegur maður, en ég tel að hann hafi verið gerður að ginningarfífli fyrir blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins bisnessinn, á kostnað heilsu karlmanna á þessu tiltekna kvöldi.
Þátturinn snart við tilfinningalegum þræði áhorfenda, með lifandi og hljóðrituðum vitnisburði frá frægum mönnum, sem höfðu sögu af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameini sem hafði verið uppgötvað með PSA prófun.
Fyrrverandi ráðherra, hershöfðinginn Colin Powell, framkvæmdarstjóri LosAngeles Dodger Joe Torre, útvarpsþáttar stjórnandinn Don Imus, leikarinn Charlton Heston, leikarinn Jerry Lewis, golfleikarinn Arnold Palmer, borgarstjóri New York Rudy Giuliani, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn John Kerry, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn Bob Dole, og hershöfðinginn Norman Schwarzkoff, sögðu allir sögu sína af viðureign sinni við blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein og augljósan ávinning sem þeir töldu að þeir hefðu fengið vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir fylgdi.
Fræg sjónvarpsstjarna Merv Griffin kom einnig fram í video klippu, en sem dæmi „ heimska sjúklingsins“ sem hunsaði ráðleggingar læknisins og galt fyrir með lífi sínu. ( Af þessum langa lista gætir þú ályktað sem svo að allir eldri menn hefðu blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.)
Áhorfendum var sagt það að með nútíma tækni þá séu hinir kvíðvænlegu fylgikvillar vegna lausheldni og getuleysis núna sjaldgæfir.
Gestirnir mættu engri mótstöðu vegna þeirra samræmdu skilaboða um að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu að vera rannsakaðir – og það var engum símtölum svarað á þessari klukkustund sem þátturinn var á.
Það verður að viðurkennast, að gestgjafinn Larry King gerði tilraun til að vekja máls á ágreiningnum sem er í kringum notkun tiltekinna blöðruhálskirtils mótefnavaka (PSA) og stafrænnar endaþarms skoðunar (DRE), og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir kemur - en hans ögrandi athugasemdir voru alltaf hunsaðar af gestum hans.
Hugsanlega var Larry King meðvitaður um það að margar af skoðununum sem komu fram á meðan á þessum klukkutíma langa þætti væru rangar, og andstætt ráðleggingum fyrir PSA prófun, sem gerð er af American College of Preventive Medicine, British Columbia Office of Technology Assessment, Canadian Cancer Society, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, og öðrum sjálfstæðum iðnaðar- samtökum.
Who’s Recommending PSA Testing? HVERJIR MÆLA MEÐ PSA PRÓFUN? Organizations Against (or Not Supporting) PSA Testing: SAMTÖK GEGN ( EÐA STYÐJA EKKI) PSA PRÓFUN. American College of Preventive Medicine Organizations Supporting PSA Testing: SAMTÖK SEM STYÐJA PSA PRÓFUN. American Urological Association This list is incomplete; however, note that special interest groups representing the prostate cancer industries support PSA testing. |
FYLGIÐ PENINGASLÓÐINNI.
Það er kanski engin tilviljun að helsti stuðningur fyrir snemm búinni greiningu blöðruhálskirtils karabbameins með PSA prófun, kemur frá læknisfræðilegum verslunarsamtökum.
Besta dæmið er American Urological Association,
http://www.auanet.org/content/homepage/homepage.cfm
sem kemur fram fyrir hönd meira 16,500 meðlima sérstakra hagsmunar samtaka (aðallega fólks innan þvagfærafræðinnar/urology ogoncology) og styrkt af ( lyfja) iðnaðarfyrirtækjum, eins og Glaxo Smith Kline, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, og mörgum öðrum fyrirtækjum sem fá innkomu frá karlmönnum með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.
Allir þrír gestirnir í þessum Larry King Live þætti, reyndust hafa fjárhagsleg tengsl við blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins iðnaðarins.
John McEnroe er opinber talsmaður fyrir lyfjafyrirtæki, Michael Milken vinnur með læknis lyfjaiðnaðinum í gegnum Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinsstofnunina (Prostate Cancer Foundation), og Dr.Christopher Rose er oncologist geislafræðingur og starfar sem forstjóri lækna hjá Krabbameins miðstöðinni fyrir geislameðferðir í Beverly Hills. (The Center for Radiation Therapy of Beverly Hills.)
Óneitanlega mun vítæk PSA prófun þýða meiri gróða fyrir lækna, sjúkrahús, rannsóknarstofur, og tækjabúnaðar – og lyfjaframleiðslu fyrirtækin.
Að vissum tíma liðnum þá virðist sem þessi tiltekni Larry King Live þáttur 21. Ágúst 2009, geti hafa verið kynningarhluti ætlað til að selja lyfið Avodart fyrir lyfjarisann Glaxo SmithKline (GSK).
Þann 16 Mars 2009 var það tilkynnt (announced)
http://www.morethanmedicine.us.gsk.com/blog/2009/03/prostate-health-is-a-serious-issue.html
að MacEnro hefði gengið til liðs við GSK til þess að biðja karlmenn um að fara til læknis í þeim tilgangi að vita hvert þeirra PSA stig væri.
Þann 27 April 2009 voru niðurstöður (results)
http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10047.htm úr prófunum hjá REductionby DUtasteride of prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) tilkynntar á fundi hjá Samtökum Amerískra Þvagfærafræðinga, (American Urological Association) í Chicago, Illinois.
Í þessarri rannsókn sýndi dutasteride, sem er hamlari fyrir blöðrukirtils-örvandi androgen5- alpha-dihhydrotestosterone, að fækka fjölda manna með blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinum 5% sem fannst með vefjasýnistöku. GSK selur dutasteride sem Avodart.
Með þessar niðurstöður frá REDUCE ferlinum, þá kemur áskorunin við að markaðsetja vöruna, sem sé að finna viðskiftavini / kúnna;
í þessu tilfelli, karlmenn með ívið hækkað PSA stig.
Þetta var akkurat það sem Larry King Live þátturinn afrekaði!
John McEnroe vann sitt verk vel.
Með um það bil 1,300.000 áhorfndur daglega, þá bætti þessi þáttur tvímælalaust við þá 218,900 karlmenn sem greindir eru árlega með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein í Bandaríkjunum.
Uppgötvun á hækkuðu PSA gæti gagnast karlmönnum, að undan skyldum þeim sem fara í núverandi meðferðir eins og skurðaraðgerðir, geislameðferð, og lyfjameðferð ( sviptingu androgens) hafa ekki sýnt sig í að bjarga lífum ( um
það bil 27,050 karlmenn létust árið 2007 af þessum sjúkdóm).
HVERSVEGNA PSA PRÓFUN OG MEÐDFERÐIN SEM FYLGIR Á EFTIR MISTEKST.
Á yfirborðinu lítur það þannig út að vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar krabbameins í blöðruhálskirtlinum, muni uppgötvunin lengja lífdaga karlmannanna.
Hvað sem því líður, þá sýna rannsóknar niðurstöður annað.
Fyrsta skýrslan frá Blöðruhálskirtils, Lungna, og Eggjastokka (PLCO) Krabbameins skimunar ferill, á áhrif skimunar með sérstakt blöðruhálskirtils antigen (PSA) prófun og stafræna endaþarms rannsókn (DRE) á dánartíðni af völdum blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins var birt í New England Journal of Medicine, March 26, 2009 – PSA og DRE bjargaði engum lífum.
Önnur þáttaskila skýrsla, birt í þessu sama hefti, var frá Evrópu og hún sýndi afdráttarlaust fækkun um minna en 1% en 1 dauðsfall hverjum 1000 karlmönnum sem tóku PSA prófið.
Það eru tvær ástæður fyrir því að PSA prófun mistekst að bjarga lífi: Fyrst, óhemju fá biopsy-prófana sannaði að krabbamein séu ógnun við líf þitt, og í öðru lagi sé snemmbúin uppgötvun goðsögn.
Um allan heim eru blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins tilfellin sem uppgötvast í smásjárskoðun á blöðruhálskirtlinum hjá 30% af karlmönnum eldri en 50ára.
Í USA er hlutfall smjásjár blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins jafnvel hærri í öllum aldurshópum:
8% manna á þrítugsaldri , 30% hjá mönnum á fertugsaldri, 50% hjá mönnum á sextugsaldri og 80% hjá mönnum á áttræðisaldri.
Hvað sem því líður, hjá flestum karlmanna þá munu þessar frumur sem líta út sem krabbamein bersýnilega aldrei dreifast, og þessvegna aldrei ógna lífi karlmnnanna.
Það var augljóst að Larry King vissi þetta, þegar hann spurði gesti sína tvisvar þessarrar spurningu.
„ Er það goðsögn að þú deyir með honum , en ekki af honum?“
Svarið er þetta: „ mikið fleiri karlmenn deyja með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein en af völdum þess.“
Jafnvel þó að blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein komi fyrir hjá flestum karlmönnum, þá er verulega lítil hætta á að hann drepi sjúklinginn; dánartíðnin er 226 per 100,000 hjá körlum yfir 65 ára aldur.
Það hættulausa en mjög algenga krabbamein er vísað til sem dulins krabbameins. Krabbameinið sem drepur, er vísað til sem þróaðs krabbameins.
Því miður, þá geta læknar ekki sagt til um það, með því að skoða blöðruhálskirtilsvef í smásjá hvort að krabbameinið muni einhverntíma verða ógnun við líf viðkomandi.
Niðurstaðan, nærri allir karlmenn sem önnur þessarra tveggja tegunda krabbameins finnst hjá, munu fá einhverja af þessum hörkulegu meðferðum: skurðaraðgerð, geislun, geldingu, og/eða kemíska lyfjameðferð.
Sorglega staðreyndin er sú, að þeir karlmenn sem hafa árásargjarna, þróaða formið af þessum sjúkdóm, munu heldur ekki hljóta ávinning af þessari meðferð, vegna þess að í þessum tilfellum er uppgötvunin með PSA og DRE alltof sein, til þess að þær meðferðir sem eru í dag muni koma að gagni.
Eftir 10 ára vöxt, þegar þessi 2 próf verða jákvæð, þá er meðaltal krabbameins massans inni í blöðruhálskirtlinum orðið um 1 cm í þvermál, eða sem samsvarar stærð strokleðurs á enda blýants, og samanstendur af um það bil billjón frumna. 5
Eins og þú getur séð, „snemmbúin uppgötvun“ er goðsögn og rangnefni – þriðjungur vaxtarins af þessu þróaða formi af þessum sjúkdóm, hafði þegar átt sér stað án vitundar sjúklingsins og hans læknis.
Í þessum fátíðu tilfellum, þegar þetta er raunverulega, „ banvænt form blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins.“ eftir 10 ára vöxt, þá hefur það þegar dreift sér um líkama mannsins.
Þegar þú ákveður að fara í PSA próf þá ertu að spila á þann möguleika að prófið muni mögulega finna krabbamein, sem muni geta verið meðhöndlað með góðum árangri og bætt lífsgæði þín og lengt þitt líf..
Hugsaðu smástund..
Þú ert að veðja á mjög lítinn möguleika af raunverulega fræðilegum ávinningi sem geti mögulega átt sér stað í fjarlægri framtíð.
Ef að PSA prófið er jákvætt (það eru 10%líkur á því) og að vefjasýnataka muni leiða í ljós krabbamein (það eru meira en 30% líkur á því) þá er harmleikurinn sem á eftir kemur tafarlaus, raunverulegur, lífs breytandi, og fyrir alla menn sem greinast (100%)
Bara það að greinast með krabbamein breytir manneskjunni það sem eftir er æfinnar.
Endurnýjun heilsu - og líftryggingar eru ekki lengur fáanlegar.
Finna starf við hæfi er mjög ótrúlegt.
Einu sinni greindur ( með krabbamein) ertu stimplaður „krabbameins sjúklingur“ það sem þú átt eftir ólifað..
Daglegar áminningar koma frá fjölskyldu, vinum, í lækna heimsóknum, og sögur í fjölmiðlum um krabbamein..
Áhyggjur og kvíði stjórna lífi sjúklingsins og fjölskyldu hans.
Framtíð hans verður að spurningarmerki..
Allir verkir í líkamanum eru túlkaðir sem endurkoma krabbameinsins .
Krabbameins fórnarlambið einangrast frá restinni af heiminnum.15
Þá eru það aukaverkanirnar frá meðferðunum.
Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins rannsóknir skýra frá að þvagleki (lausheldni) var algengari hjá radical prostatectomy (35%) heldur en með geisla meðferð(12%) eða sviftingu androgen(11%)
Ris vandamál komu iðulega í kjölfar allra meðferðanna (radical prostatectomy, 58%; radiation therapy, 43%;androgen deprivation, 86%).16
Lausheldni þýddi blautar buxur, bleijur, og stundum þvaglegg ( catheter) í blöðru mannsins það sem eftir var æfinnar. Niðurstaða Blöðruhálskirtils Krabbameins rannsóknarinnar er íhaldssöm.
Það er líklegt að meira en 80 % af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins sjúklingunum þrói með sér ris vandamál, erectile dysfunction
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/treating/radiation-therapy.html
hvort sem þeir hafa farið í skurðaraðgerð, eða yfirborðs geisla meðferð.
Og þetta eru einungis 2 af mörgum aukaverkununum sem koma frá bestu lyfjunum sem hægt er að bjóða karlmanni með jákvæða PSA prófun.
ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ
HEIMILDIR:
1)Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, MinasianLM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr.?? Prevalenceof prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May27;350(22):2239-46.
2)Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. Anexamination of the evidence. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov23;333(21):1401-5.
3)McNaughton C. Early detection of prostate cancer. Serendipity strikes again. JAMA. 1997Nov 12;278(18):1516-9.
4)Brawn PN. Prostate-specific antigen levels from completely sectioned,clinically benign, whole prostates.Cancer. 1991 Oct 1;68(7):1592-9.
5)Friberg S, Mattson S. On the growth rates of human malignant tumors:implications for medical decision making. JSurg Oncol. 1997 Aug;65(4):284-97.
6) NealDE, Donovan JL. Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen? LancetOncol. 2000 Sep;1(1):17-24.
7)Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematicreview: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localizedprostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008Mar 18;148(6):435-48
8)Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN,Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O'Brien B, Clapp JD,Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF,Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Mortality results from arandomized prostate-cancer screening trial. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9.
9)Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, KwiatkowskiM, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Määttänen L,Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, MossSM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancermortality in a randomized European study. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8.
10)Franks LM. Proceedings: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology ofprostatic cancer. Cancer. 1973 Nov;32(5):1092-5.
11) Holund B. Latent prostatic cancer in a consecutive autopsy series. ScandJ Urol Nephrol.1980;14(1):29-35.
12) Sakr WA . The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of theprostate in young male patients. JUrol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):379-85.
13)Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J. Theprostate specific antigen (PSA) era in the United States is over for prostatecancer: What happened in the last 20 years. J Urol. 2004Oct;172(4, Part 1 Of 2):1297-1301.
14)Selley S . Diagnosis, management and screening of early localisedprostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(2):i,1-96.
15)Little M. Chronic illness and the experience of surviving cancer. InternMed J. 2004 Apr;34(4):201-2.
16)Hoffman RM, Hunt WC, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL. Patientsatisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostatecarcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.Cancer. 2003;97:1653-62.
17)Wilson LS, Tesoro R, Elkin EP, Sadetsky N, Broering JM, Latini DM, DuChane J, ModyRR, Carroll PR. Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancertreatments. Cancer.2007 Feb 1;109(3):518-27
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 14.4.2024 kl. 19:34 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (2)
5.1.2010 | 04:00
33 samsæriskenningar sem reyndust vera sannar..33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True
33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True
What Every Person Should Know...
Core Of Corruption - In The Shadows
Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy.
However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.
To conspire means,
"to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end."
The term "conspiracy theory" is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from "the people".
To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature. Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions. Certainly we can all agree on this.
So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore? Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding. Or am I?
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo102.htm
By Jonathan Elinoff, New World Order Report
http://www.newworldorderreport.com
After reading the article released by Cracked.com, I decided to update and revise their sloppy work. Their article had only 7. I can name 33 and I am planning on releasing a revised list soon with up to 50. The article I was insulted to read by the lack of information can be viewed here,
7 Insane Conspiracies That Actually Happened
https://www.cracked.com/article_15974_7-insane-conspiracies-that-actually-happened.html but don't waste your time, all of that is in this article and more.
Most people can't resist getting the details on the latest conspiracy theories, no matter how far-fetched they may seem. At the same time, many people quickly denounce any conspiracy theory as untrue ... and sometimes as unpatriotic or just plain ridiculous. Lets not forget all of the thousands of conspiracies out of Wall Street like Bernie Madoff and many others to commit fraud and extortion, among many crimes of conspiracy.
USA Today reports that over 75% of personal ads in the paper and on craigslist are married couples posing as single for a one night affair. When someone knocks on your door to sell you a set of knives or phone cards, anything for that matter, do they have a profit motive? What is conspiracy other than just a scary way of saying “alternative agenda”? When 2 friends go to a bar and begin to plan their wingman approach on 2 girls they see at the bar, how often are they planning on lying to those girls? “I own a small business and am in town for a short while. Oh yeah, you look beautiful.”
Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy. However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.
To conspire means "to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end." The term "conspiracy theory" is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from "the people".
To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature. Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions. Certainly we can all agree on this. So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore? Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding. Or am I?
Skeptics are important in achieving an objective view of reality, however, skeptism is not the same as reinforcing the official storyline. In fact, a conspiracy theory can be argued as an alternative to the official or “mainstream” story of events.
Therefore, when skeptics attempt to ridicule a conspiracy theory by using the official story as a means of proving the conspiracy wrong, in effect, they are just reinforcing the original “mainstream” view of history, and actually not being skeptical.
This is not skeptism, it is just a convenient way for the establishment view of things to be seen as the correct version, all the time, every time. In fact, it is common for "hit pieces" or "debunking articles" to pick extremely fringe and not very populated conspiracy theories. This in turn makes all conspiracies on a subject matter look crazy. Skeptics magazine and Popular Mechanics, among many others, did this with 9/11.
They referred to less than 10% of the many different conspiracy theories about 9/11 and picked the less popular ones, in fact, they picked the fringe, highly improbable points that only a few people make. This was used as the "final investigation" for looking into the conspiracy theories. Convenient, huh?
In fact, if one were to look into conspiracy theories, they will largely find that thinking about a conspiracy is associated with lunacy and paranoia. Some websites suggest it as an illness. It is also not surprising to see so many people on the internet writing about conspiracy theories in a condescending tone, usually with the words "kool-aid," "crack pot," or "nut job" in their articulation. This must be obvious to anyone that emotionally writing about such serious matter insults the reader more than the conspiracy theorist because there is no need to resort to this kind of behavior. It is employed often with an "expert" who will say something along the lines of, "for these conspiracies to be true, you would need hundreds if not thousands of people to be involved. It's just not conceivable."
I find it extremely odd that the assumption is on thousands of participants in a conspiracy. I, for one, find it hard to believe any conspiracy involving more than a handful of people but the fact remains that there hae been conspiracies in our world, proven and not made up, that involved many hundreds of people. It's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of fact.
One more thing to consider, have you noticed that if the conspiracy is involving powerful interests with the ability to bribe, threaten or manipulate major institutions (like the mafia, big corporations or government) then don't you find it odd when people use one of those as the "credible" counter-argument?
What I mean is, if you are discussing a conspiracy about the mafia, and someone hands you a debunking article that was written by the mafia, it doesn't seem like it would take rocket science to look at that with serious criticism and credibility. This is the case with many conspiracies. In fact, I am handed debunking pieces all the time written in many cases by the conspirators in question.
Does this not seem odd to anybody else but me?
While intelligent cynicism certainly can be healthy, though, some of the greatest discoveries of all time were initially received (often with great vitriol) as blasphemous conspiracy theories -- think of the revelation that the earth was not the center of the universe, or that the world was not flat but actually round.
What follows are some of these most shocking modern conspiracy theories that turned out true after thorough investigation by our society. Some through congressional hearings, others through investigative journalism. Many of these, however, were just admitted to by those involved.
These are just 33 of them, and I still had a long list of others to add.
There are a total of 33 in this article. Many of these are listed with original and credible news clips on the matter, as well as documentaries.
1. The Dreyfus Affair: In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).
2. The Mafia: This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society's secrets to law enforcement officials. What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world.
3. MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a "truth serum" to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.
A short video about MK-ULTRA from a documentary called Secrets of the CIA:
4. Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to '70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated "Animal Farm," by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.
5. Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. The project's roots lay in scientists' fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret. With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history. Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years. Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.
6. Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.
7. Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn't until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.
8. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.
9. Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up aU.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.
10. 1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony. It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait. Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA. The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl's account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, "The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind... I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman's story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations." Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations "by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador's daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify."
11. Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s: COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI's stated motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order." According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women's rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those "seeking independence for Puerto Rico." The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert "white hate groups," including the Ku Klux Klan and National States' Rights Party. The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders.
This is a documentary on COINTELPRO:
COINTELPRO: FBI's War On Black America **(HIGH QUALITY)**
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3729458480013375211&hl=en#
<embed id=VideoPlayback src=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=3729458480013375211&hl=en&fs=true style=width:400px;height:326px allowFullScreen=true allowScriptAccess=always type=application/x-shockwave-flash> </embed>
12. The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and '86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.
13. The BCCI Scandal: The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. In the late 1980's BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed. BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a "$20-billion-plus heist". Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection."
This is a report from July 23, 1991 on the BCCI:
This is a report from July 8, 1991 on Connections between BCCI and the CIA:
This is a report from August 6, 1991 on how the BCCI funded Pakistan's
Nuclear Programs:
This is a report from March 4, 1991 on the BCCI:
14. CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others. In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury Newspublished Webb's "Dark Alliance", a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. "Dark Alliance" received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became "the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade."
April 6, 1987 Report on CIA Drug Running:
January 20, 1987 Report on CIA Drug Smuggling
November 19, 1993 Report on CIA Drug Running:
15. Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats. This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War. After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese. The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by "communist aggression". In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…” In truth, Hanoi's navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2. In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: "For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there." In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick's ship's log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded. In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2. In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator's report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one. In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors
November 9th, 1995 New Clip on Gulf of Tonkin:
16. The Business Plot: In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we're talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one. Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932. Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934. Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages. Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America's entry into World War II. In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler's allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.
On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This "Bonus Army" was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time. A few days after Butler's arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur. Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year's election. In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. "Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism." Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.
BBC - Whitehouse Coup (Part 1)
The Whitehouse Coup (1933) 2 of 3
The Whitehouse Coup (1933) 3 of 3
17. July 20, 1944 Conspiracy to Assassinate Hitler: Among another 20 some odd attempts, this one was one of the largest conspiracies involving hundreds of loyalists in the highest echelons of Hitler’s inner circle. Near the end of WWII, things were rapidly going south for Germany and the time seemed ripe for guilt-ridden Nazi officers to assassinate Hitler and overthrow his government. Colonel Henning von Tresckow recruited Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg to join the conspiracy in 1944. The plot to take out Hitler and then all of his loyal officers was called Operation Valkyrie. The plan was to use the Continuity of Government Proceedings during an assassination on Hitler’s life to take over full control of the government in Germany. The assassination would be blamed on the Nazi SS and therefore allow Stauffenberg to take full control of all aspects of the government. It almost worked. In July 1944, Stauffenberg was promoted so that he could now start attending military strategy meetings with Hitler himself. On more than one occasion Stauffenberg planned to kill Hitler at such a meeting with a briefcase bomb, but he always held off because he also wanted to take out Hitler's two right-hand men, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. On July 20, he went for it anyway and exploded a bomb inside Hitler's conference room with a remote detonator. Hitler survived only minor injuries.
18. Operation Ajax: For years, Britain had a spiffy trade deal with Iran regarding their prodigious oil fields. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was basically a giant money machine for the Anglo half, while the Iranian half got shafted. That all changed in 1951 when Iran nationalized the AIOC and the Iranian parliament elected Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister. Mossadegh was relatively secular, something that pissed of Iranian clerics, but he was also very nationalistic. He was a democratically elected, pro American figure but the West saw his nationalizing of the oil fields a communist move(something Mossadegh thought was the right of the people to profit and pay for services in the country with). Those oil fields were under the control of British Petroleum, but unfortunately Mossadegh overruled this long standing business control. TheUnited States sent Kermit Roosevelt, FDR’s nephew and CIA coordinator in to figure out the mess. The best he could come up with was to confront Mossadegh and have him overthrown and this was accomplished by bringing in what the agency refers to as “jackals.” The United States backed the return of the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal dictators the country had ever seen and intentionally overthrew years before with the democratic leader, Mossadegh. Until 1979, that is, when a pissed off Iranian populace finally revolted and replaced the monarchy with an anti-West Islamic Republic. The result was a violently anti-American revolution lead by the Ayatollah Khomeini which overthrew the Shah and took hostage US Embassy workers, many of whom were involved in the plot with Kermit Roosevelt that installed the Shah. The planning for the Coup took place largely in that embassy, but Americans were told this was due to the rise of radical Islam and rise of democracy hating Muslims, which of course was far from the truth.
Part 1 of a video done on Operation Ajax history:
Part 2 of the video:
19. Operation Snow White: Some time during the 1970s, the Church of Scientology decided that they'd had enough. Apparently, the Church of Scientology managed to perform the largest infiltration of the United States government in history. Ever. 5,000 of Scientology's crack commandos wiretapped and burglarized various agencies. They stole hundreds of documents, mainly from the IRS. No critic was spared, and in the end, 136 organizations, agencies and foreign embassies were infiltrated.
20. Operation Gladio: Gladio is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO "stay-behind" operation in Italy after World War II, intended to continue anti-communist resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organizations, "Operation Gladio" is used as an informal name for all stay-behind organizations, sometimes called "Super NATO". The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation.Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter. What can we prove about that role? Thousands of documents, depositions and testimony as well as recorded conversations and admission by the highest levels of government in Italy. That’s about as credible as it gets, regardless of the CIA’s adamant denial it ever happened. What took place? The shooting of innocent civilians, terrorism and assassinations all blamed on leftist communists were actually apart of well coordinated, “black operations.” Black operations are typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol.
“The right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.” Black ops missions often fit into the deniable category, a situation in which there is no claim of responsibility for the action, and/or a false flag operation is used to give the appearance that another actor was responsible, or – most often – black operations involve extensive arrangements so as to be able to hide the fact that the black operation ever occurred. Black military operations, or paramilitary operations, can be used by various secret services to achieve or attempt to achieve an unusually sensitive goal. The methods used in black operations are also used in unconventional warfare. Depending on the precise situation in a given case, and the level of authoritarianism of the national government or other responsible party, some tasks will be conducted as black operations, while there are usually other activities that can be admitted openly. Black operations may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one's own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, etc. Since 9/11, many black operations and long time unethical standings have been approved for legality in the war on terror. In other words, since September 11th, 2001, it is no a longer conspiracy for any of this to occur, a simple decision by a top level military or CIA official is enough, without oversight or even one thread of admission by the Government or Private conspirators. Much of the Black operations today are performed by private contract companies like Blackwater (now Xe).
This is a documentary banned in teh United States that was allowed to air on BBC.
It was an investigation into Operation Gladio:
Timewatch:
Operation Gladio - Behind False Flag Terrorism & 9/11 (part3) 48:45
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3409375633223151728&hl=en#
21. The CIA Assassinates A Lot Of People (Church Committee): The Church Committee is the common term referring to the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the CIA and FBI after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair. The Committee uncovered, among many other things, that the CIA had violated its charter to perform only gathering of intelligence. For example, the assassinations of Allende in Chile and Mossadegh in Iran. Assassinations against Central and South American leaders and revolutionaries, as well as Africa, Middle East and East Asia. The list was tremendous. They even declassified a “Heart Attack Gun” the Agency had made for the use of killing someone without it being detected. Cancer, car accidents, skiing accidents, suicide, boating accidents, heart attacks, and just plain being shot were common assassination methods. The hearings, although recorded in full in congressional record, the mainstream media and official policies, is still largely not taught in American schools on recent history. The American public still has no idea this was ever actually confirmed or even took place. It is common for people to still refer to any of these assassinations as a joke or made up conspiracy.
Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon which caused heart attacks.
To watch the revealing 45-minute documentary from which the above clip was taken,
http://personalgrowthcourses.net/video/secrets_cia
22. The New World Order: This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will. The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group. Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage. They receive no media coverage. The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what?
Discussions at the meetings include the economy, world affairs, war and in general, world policy. After the financial collapse, the Bilderberg played a key role in proposing that the world prepare for a new world order and have a standard world currency. This was propsed shortly after by almost all attendees of the Bilderberg meeting. During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic or liberal proposals for global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and N.A.T.O., and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism. In the aftermath of the two World Wars, progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice. American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman.
In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein,
on page 405, he wrote:
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement bent on creating a "real" new world order. A number of Fabian socialist intellectuals, such as British writer H. G. Wells in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a full-fledged social democratic world government. In the 1960s, a great deal of right-wing conspiracist attention, by groups like the John Birch Society and the Liberty Lobby, focused on the United Nations as the vehicle for creating the "One World Government", and contributed to a conservative movement for United States withdrawal from the U.N.. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, "international bankers" would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers. American televangelist Pat Robertson with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.
After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods", which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that "conspiracy theorists were right". In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists, such as American radio host Alex Jones, who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.
May 24, 1992 Report on New World Order:
23. Kennedy Assassination - the 2nd Investigation by Congress Few People Know About, United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA): The HSCA was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated by a conspiracy involving the mob, and potentially the CIA. The House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a "probable conspiracy," though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby's mafia connections and potential CIA and/or FBI connections to Oswald. To this day, many conspiracy deniers are unaware that the Congressional investigation into JFK’s assassination concluded beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was a conspiracy. What made them come to this conclusion? Aside from reading the report, many witnesses (some of whom were CIA agents and station chiefs in Dallas that morning) were killed the night before testifying. For example, George de Mohrenschildt was a petroleum geologist who befriended Lee Harvey Oswald during the months preceding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy. He also worked for the CIA. He also blew his brains out the night before he was to testify to the committee. The committee also uncovered, among many things, that Oswald left the marines where he learned how to speak fluent Russian (at the height of the cold war). He was given money by the State Department to travel to Russia where he stopped off in Japan at a top secret US Military facility. The Warren Commission even mentioned this part. What most people do not know is that he probably was working in the Cold War infiltrating the Russians as either a “dangle,” “double agent,” or “defector" of some kind. What is interesting is that upon his return he got more money from the State Department to buy a house and work with an ex FBI Chief and CIA officials in training anti-Castro Cubans for an invasion. In Louisiana, where he was working, the CIA was involved in Operation Mongoose, Where Oswald worked under CIA Agent David Ferrie, who killed himself before testifying in a trial on the Assassination as well. Operation Mongoose worked closely with Southern Mafia figures largely because , the casinos in Cuba, which were shut down after Fidel obtained control over the country, were epicenters for control on the island. The CIA even hired the mafia to assassinate Fidel on many occasions, 3 attempts which failed are common knowledge. What is funny is that figures who worked very close with Oswald either ended up dead (over 100 of them connected to the assassination died within a few years of unusual circumstances) or they ended up in other conspiracies.
February 201986 report on Mena Drug Smuggling:
For instance, E Howard Hunt (CIA Agent) confessed to being involved in the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy on his deathbed. E Howard Hunt was one of the Watergate Burglars. Barry Seal, who worked with Oswald and Ferrie ended up being one of the largest cocaine smugglers in the United States during Iran Contra, as a key player for the agency and informant for the DEA. There is so much more to get into, but there just isn’t enough time. Oswald's tax returns are still classified top secret to this day. Why? Perhaps he was still getting $$ from the United States, which places him on the payroll. That money trail leads to figures, many of whom were murdered, that would have blown the story wide open. For 14 years, most didn't know this. The HSCA investigaitons by congress went against the findings of the Warren Commission and both reports are from the same source, Congressional Committees. Which is true? Why do we only teach one to our children in school?
December 30, 1978 Report on HSCA Findings:
24. 1919 World Series Conspiracy: The 1919 World Series (often referred to as the Black Sox Scandal) resulted in the most famous scandal in baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the Black Sox) were accused of throwing the series against the Cincinnati Reds. Details of the scandal remain controversial, and the extent to which each player was involved varied. It was, however, front-page news across the country when the story was uncovered late in the 1920 season, and despite being acquitted of criminal charges (throwing baseball games was technically not a crime), the eight players were banned from organized baseball (i.e. the leagues subject to the National Agreement) for life. There are hundreds of other conspiracies involving throwing games, sporting matches and large scale entertainment events. It is common knowledge for many, this list would have to go into the thousands if we included all of them.
25. Karen Silkwood: Karen was an American labor union activist and chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plant near Crescent, Oklahoma, United States. Silkwood's job was making plutonium pellets for nuclear reactor fuel rods. After being hired at Kerr-McGee, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union local and took part in a strike at the plant. After the strike ended, she was elected to the union's bargaining committee and assigned to investigate health and safety issues. She discovered what she believed to be numerous violations of health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment and improper storage of samples. She also believed the lack of sufficient shower facilities could increase the risk of employee contamination. In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about these issues, alleging that safety standards had slipped because of a production speedup which resulted in employees being given tasks for which they were poorly trained. She also alleged that Kerr-McGee employees handled the fuel rods improperly and that the company falsified inspection records. On November 5, 1974, Silkwood performed a routine self-check and found almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. She was decontaminated at the plant and sent home with a testing kit to collect urine and feces for further analysis. Oddly, though there was plutonium on the exterior surfaces (the ones she touched) of the gloves she had been using, the gloves did not have any holes.
This suggests the contamination did not come from inside the glove box, but from some other source, in other words, someone was trying to poison her. The next morning, as she headed to a union negotiation meeting, she again tested positive for plutonium. This was surprising because she had only performed paperwork duties that morning. She was given a more intense decontamination. The following day, November 7, 1974, as she entered the plant, she was found to be dangerously contaminated — even expelling contaminated air from her lungs. A health physics team accompanied her back to her home and found plutonium traces on several surfaces — especially in the bathroom and the refrigerator. The house was later stripped and decontaminated. Silkwood, her partner and housemate were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory for in-depth testing to determine the extent of the contamination in their bodies. Later that evening, Silkwood's body was found in her car, which had run off the road and struck a culvert. The car contained no documents. She was pronounced dead at the scene from a "classic, one-car sleeping-driver accident".
26. CIA Drug Smuggling in Arkansas: August 23, 1987, in a rural community just south of Little Rock, police officers murdered two teenage boys because they witnessed a police-protected drug drop. The drop was part of a drug smuggling operation based at a small airport in Mena,Arkansas. The Mena operation was set up in the early 1980's by the notorious drug smuggler, Barry Seal. Facing prison after a drug conviction in Florida, Seal flew to Washington, D.C., where he put together a deal that allowed him to avoid prison by becoming an informant for the government. As a government informant against drug smugglers, Seal testified he worked for the CIA and the DEA. In one federal court case, he testified that his income from March 1984 to August 1985, was between $700,000 and $800,000. This period was AFTER making his deal with the government. Seal testified that nearly $600,000 of this came from smuggling drugs while working for -- and with the permission of the DEA. In addition to his duties as an informant, Seal was used by CIA operatives to help finance the Nicaraguan Contras. The CIA connection to the Mena operation was undeniable when a cargo plane given to Seal by the CIA was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of weapons. In spite of the evidence, every investigator who has tried to expose the crimes of Mena has been professionally destroyed, and those involved in drug smuggling operations have received continued protection from state and federal authorities.
February 20, 1986 report on Mena Drug Smuggling:
April 7, 1988 Report on CIA Drug Running:
Iran Contra CIA Drug Running Mena Arkansas Barry Seal 3 25 1994 CBS
27. Bohemian Grove: For years, many conspiracy theorists were saying that the rich and powerful met every year in the woods and worshiped a giant stone owl in an occult fashion. It turns out, ABC, CBS, NBC, and many other credible news agencies investigated this and found out, its true. It is said to be just all fun and games, like brotherhood style fraternity stuff.
These news clips can be viewed by clicking here.
July 21, 1983 Report on Bohemian Grove Mentioned:
For more clips on the Bohemian Grove including comprehensive investigations by the mainstream media, clik here...
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Articles/tabid/266/ID/588/Rare-news-clips-about-Bohemian-Grove
surfaced-for-documentary-film-project.aspx
28. Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip was the code name for the 1945 Office of Strategic Services, Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency recruitment of German scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after VE Day. President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he expressly ordered that anyone found "to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism" would be excluded. These included Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold, who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a "menace to the security of the Allied Forces." All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds "bleached" by the military; false employment histories were provided, and their previous Nazi affiliations were expunged from the record. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name.
29. The Round Table: British businessman Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an "Imperial Federation" to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, of 1877, written at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal: “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labor and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.”
In his later wills, a more mature Rhodes abandoned the idea and instead concentrated on what became the Rhodes Scholarship, which had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in 1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared world view among future British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at the University of Oxford. Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end, Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and, with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to elicit their support. The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949 but it would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner and Curtis. The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period.
Originally envisioned as a British-American group of scholars and diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S. secretary of state, Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on 29 July 1921. The first of the council’s projects was a quarterly journal launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs. Some believe that the Council on Foreign Relations is a front organization for the Round Table as a tool of the "Anglo-American Establishment", which they believe has been plotting from 1900 on to rule the world. The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of the American Old Right (Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to substantiate this view, even though he argued that the Establishment is not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic elites in the United Kingdom and the United States. Quigley also argued that, although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today it is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.
American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirswherein, on page 405, he wrote: “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” Barkun argues that this statement is partly facetious (the claim of "conspiracy" or "treason") and partly serious – the desire to encourage trilateral cooperation among the U.S., Europe, and Japan, for example – an ideal that used to be a hallmark of the internationalist wing of the Republican Party when there was an internationalist wing. However, the statement is taken at face value and widely cited by conspiracy theorists as proof that the Council on Foreign Relations (itself alleged to be a front for an "international banking cabal", as well as, it is claimed, the sponsor of many "globalist" think tanks such as the Trilateral Commission) uses its role as the brain trust of American presidents, senators and representatives to manipulate them into supporting a New World Order.
Conspiracy theorists fear that the international bankers of financial capitalism are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”. In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered: “I don't think that I really feel that we need a world government. We need governments of the world that work together and collaborate. But, I can't imagine that there would be any likelihood or even that it would be desirable to have a single government elected by the people of the world ...
There have been people, ever since I've had any kind of position in the world, who have accused me of being ruler of the world. I have to say that I think for the large part, I would have to decide to describe them as crackpots. It makes no sense whatsoever, and isn't true, and won't be true, and to raise it as a serious issue seems to me to be irresponsible.” Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup, argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an "imperial brain trust", which has, for decades, played a central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the post-WWII international order and the Cold War, by determining what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table; while others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere policy discussion forum, which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy planning. The latter argue that it has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the group; all the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates and speakers; and as far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access to its historical archives.
30. The Illuminati: The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded on May 1st, 1776, in Ingolstadt (Upper Bavaria), by Adam Weishaupt, who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. The movement consisted of freethinkers, secularists, liberals, republicans and pro-feminists, recruited in the Masonic Lodges of Germany, who sought to promote perfectionism through mystery schools. As a result, in 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the monarchy and state religion. In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati survived their suppression and became the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being enlightened absolutists who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a world revolution in order to globalize the most radical ideals of the Enlightenment: anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent. Although many say that the Illuminati was disbanded and destroyed so long ago, it is well known that the Rothschild dynasty following the family’s involvement in the secret order in Bavaria received much attention for its major takeover of Europe’s central banks. The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s wealth and evidence suggests it has funded both sides of major wars, including the United States Civil War.
31. The Trilateral Commission: The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations. In July 1972, Rockefeller called his first meeting, which was held at Rockefeller's Pocantico compound in New York's Hudson Valley. It was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and industry. Its first executive committee meeting was held in Tokyo in October 1973. The Trilateral Commission was officially initiated, holding biannual meetings. A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975 meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade and Finance, said: "Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system." Another Commission document read: "The overriding goal is to make the world safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides for each country against external and internal threats which will constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national government into the international exchange of both economic and non-economic goods."
March 29, 1981 News Clip on Trilateral Commission:
May 2, 1995 News Clip on Trilateral Commission:
32. Big Brother or the Shadow Government:
It is also called the “Deep State” by Peter Dale Scott, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. A shadow government is a "government-in-waiting" that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event. It turned out this was true on 9/11, when it was told to us by our mainstream media. For years, this was ridiculed as a silly, crazy conspiracy theory and, like the others listed here, turned out to be 100% true. It is also called the Continuity of Government. The Continuity of Government (COG) is the principle of establishing defined procedures that allow a government to continue its essential operations in case of nuclear war or other catastrophic event. Since the end of the cold war, the policies and procedures for the COG have been altered according to realistic threats of that time. These include but are not limited to a possible coup or overthrow by right wing terrorist groups, a terrorist attack in general, an assassination, and so on. Believe it or not the COG has been in effect since 2001. After 9/11, it went into action. Now here is the kicker, many of the figures in Iran Contra, the Watergate Scandal, the alleged conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and many others listed here are indeed members of the COG. This is its own conspiracy as well.
March 1, 2002 News Clip on Secret Government:
The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States
and the World
is a book written by Air Force Col. L fletcher Prouty, published in 1973. From 1955 to 1963 Prouty was the "Focal Point Officer" for contacts between the CIA and the Pentagon on matters relating to military support for "black operations" but he was not assigned to the CIA and was not bound by any oath of secrecy. (From the first page of the 1974 Printing) It was one of the first tell-all books about the inner workings of the CIA and was an important influence on the Oliver Stone movie JFK. But the main thrust of the book is how the CIA started as a think tank to analyze intelligence gathered from military sources but has grown to the monster it has become. The CIA had no authority to run their own agents or to carry out covert operations but they quickly did both and much more. This book tells about things they actually did and a lot about how the operate. In Prouty's own words, from the 1997 edition of The Secret Team: This is the fundamental game of the Secret Team. They have this power because they control secrecy and secret intelligence and because they have the ability to take advantage of the most modern communications system in the world, of global transportation systems, of quantities of weapons of all kinds, and when needed, the full support of a world-wide U.S. military supporting base structure. They can use the finest intelligence system in the world, and most importantly, they have been able to operate under the canopy of an assumed, ever-present enemy called "Communism." It will be interesting to see what "enemy" develops in the years ahead. It appears that "UFO's and Aliens" are being primed to fulfill that role for the future. To top all of this, there is the fact that the CIA, itself, has assumed the right to generate and direct secret operations. " He is not the first to allege that UFOs and Aliens are going to be used as a threat against the world to globalize the planet under One government.
March 1, 2002 report on Secret Government:
The Report From Iron Mountain is a book, published in
(during the Johnson Administration) by Dial Press, that states that it is the report of a government panel. According to the report, a 15-member panel, called the Special Study Group, was set up in 1963 to examine what problems would occur if the U.S. entered a state of lasting peace. They met at an underground nuclear bunker called Iron Mountain (as well as other, worldwide locations) and worked over the next two years. Iron Mountain is where the government has stored the flight 93 evidence from 9/11. A member of the panel, one "John Doe", a professor at a college in theMidwest, decided to release the report to the public. The heavily footnoted report concluded that peace was not in the interest of a stable society, that even if lasting peace "could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of society to achieve it." War was a part of the economy. Therefore, it was necessary to conceive a state of war for a stable economy. The government, the group theorized, would not exist without war, and nation states existed in order to wage war. War also served a vital function of diverting collective aggression. They recommended that bodies be created to emulate the economic functions of war. They also recommended "blood games" and that the government create alternative foes that would scare the people with reports of alien life-forms and out of control pollution. Another proposal was the reinstitution of slavery. U.S. News and World Report claimed in its November 20, 1967 issue to have confirmation of the reality of the report from an unnamed government official, who added that when President Johnson read the report, he 'hit the roof' and ordered it to be suppressed for all time. Additionally, sources were said to have revealed that orders were sent to U.S.embassies, instructing them to emphasize that the book had no relation to U.S. Government policy. Project Blue Beam is also a common conspiracy theory that alleges that a faked alien landing would be used as a means of scaring the public into whatever global system is suggested. Some researchers suggest the Report from Iron Mountain might be fabricated, others swear it is real.
Bill Moyers, the American journalist and public commentator, has served as White House Press Secretary in the United States President Lyndon B. Johnson Administration from 1965 to 1967. He worked as a news commentator on television for ten years. Moyers has had an extensive involvement with public television, producing documentaries and news journal programs. He has won numerous awards and honorary degrees. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media. Since 1990, Moyers has been President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy. He is considered by many to be a very credible outlet for the truth. He released a documetnary titled, The Secret Government, which exposed the inner workings of a secret government much more vast that most people would ever imagine. Though originally broadcast in 1987, it is even more relevant today. Interviews with respected top military, intelligence, and government insiders reveal both the history and secret objectives of powerful groups in the hidden shadows of our government.
Here is that documentary:
The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, by Bill Moyers
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3505348655137118430&hl=en#
For another powerful, highly revealing documentary on the manipulations of the secret government produced by BBC, click here (view free at link provided).
The intrepid BBC team clearly shows how the War on Terror is largely a fabrication.
For those interested in very detailed information on the composition of the shadow or secret government from a less well-known source, take a look at the summary available here.
33. The Federal Reserve Bank: The fundamental promise of a central bank like the Federal Reserve is economic stability. The theory is that manipulating the value of the currency allows financial booms to go higher, and crashes to be more mild. If growth becomes speculative and unsustainable, the central bank can make the price of money go up and force some deleveraging of risky investments - again, promising to make the crashes more mild. The period leading up to the American revolution was characterized by increasingly authoritarian legislation from England. Acts passed in 1764 had a particularly harsh effect on the previously robust colonial economy. The Sugar Act was in effect a tax cut on easily smuggled molasses, and a new tax on commodities that England more directly controlled trade over. The navy would be used in increased capacity to enforce trade laws and collect duties. Perhaps even more significant than the militarization and expansion of taxes was the Currency Act passed later in the year 1764. "The colonies suffered a constant shortage of currency with which to conduct trade. There were no gold or silver mines and currency could only be obtained through trade as regulated by Great Britain. Many of the colonies felt no alternative to printing their own paper money in the form of Bills of Credit." The result was a true free market of currency - each bank competed, exchange rates fluctuated wildly, and merchants were hesitant to accept these notes as payment. Of course, they didn't have 24-hour digital Forex markets, but I'll hold off opinions on the viability of unregulated currency for another time. England's response was to seize control of the colonial money supply - forbidding banks, cities, and colony governments from printing their own. This law, passed so soon after the Sugar Act, started to really bring revolutionary tension inside the colonies to a higher level. American bankers had learned early on that debasing a currency through inflation is a helpful way to pay off perpetual trade deficits - but Britain proved that the buyer of the currency would only take the deal for so long...
Following the (first) American Revolution, the "First Bank of the United States" was chartered to pay off collective war debts, and effectively distribute the cost of the revolution proportionately throughout all of the states. Although the bank had vocal and harsh skeptics, it only controlled about 20% of the nation's money supply.
Compared to today's central bank, it was nothing. Thomas Jefferson argued vocally against the institution of the bank, mostly citing constitutional concerns and the limitations of government found in the 10th amendment. There was one additional quote that hints at the deeper structural flaw of a central bank in a supposedly free capitalist economy. "the existing banks will, without a doubt, enter into arrangements for lending their agency, and the more favorable, as there will be a competition among them for it; whereas the bill delivers us up bound to the national bank, who are free to refuse all arrangement, but on their own terms, and the public not free, on such refusal, to employ any other bank" –Thomas Jefferson. Basically, the existing banks will fight over gaining favor with the central bank - rather than improving their performance relative to a free market.
The profit margins associated with collusion would obviously outweigh the potential profits gained from legitimate business. The Second Bank of the United States was passed five years after the first bank's charter expired. An early enemy of central banking, President James Madison, was looking for a way to stabilize the currency in 1816. This bank was also quite temporary - it would only stay in operation until 1833 when President Andrew Jackson would end federal deposits at the institution.
The charter expired in 1836 and the private corporation was bankrupt and liquidated by 1841. While the South had been the major opponent of central banking systems, the end of the Civil War allowed for (and also made necessary) the system of national banks that would dominate the next fifty years. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) says that this post-war period of a unified national currency and system of national banks "worked well." [3] Taxes on state banks were imposed to encourage people to use the national banks - but liquidity problems persisted as the money supply did not match the economic cycles. Overall, the American economy continued to grow faster than Europe, but the period did not bring economic stability by any stretch of the imagination. Several panics and runs on the bank - and it became a fact of life under this system of competing nationalized banks. In 1873, 1893, 1901, and 1907 significant panics caused a series of bank failures.
The new system wasn't stable at all, in fact, many suspected it was wraught with fraud and manipulation. The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis is not shy about attributing the causes of the Panic of 1907 to financial manipulation from the existing banking establishment. "If Knickerbocker Trust would falter, then Congress and the public would lose faith in all trust companies and banks would stand to gain, the bankers reasoned." In timing with natural economic cycles, major banks including J.P. Morgan and Chase launched an all-out assault on Heinze's Knickerbocker Trust. Financial institutions on the inside started silently selling off assets in the competitor, and headlines about a few bad loans started making top spots in the newspapers. The run on Knickerbocker turned into a general panic - and the Federal Government would come to the rescue of its privately owned "National Banks." During the Panic of 1907, "Depositors 'run' on the Knickerbocker Bank. J.P. Morgan and James Stillman of First National City Bank (Citibank) act as a "central bank," providing liquidity ... [to stop the bank run] President Theodore Roosevelt provides Morgan with $25 million in government funds ... to control the panic. Morgan, acting as a one-man central bank, decides which firms will fail and which firms will survive." How did JP Morgan get so powerful that the government would provide them with funding to increase their power? They had key influence with positions inside the Administrations.
They had senators, congressmen, lobbyists, media moguls all working for them. In 1886, a group of millionaires purchased Jekyll Island and converted it into a winter retreat and hunting ground, theUSA's most exclusive club. By 1900, the club's roster represented 1/6th of the world's wealth. Names like Astor, Vanderbilt, Morgan, Pulitzer and Gould filled the club's register. Non- members, regardless of stature, were not allowed. Dignitaries like Winston Churchill and President McKinley were refused admission. In 1908, the year after a national money panic purportedly created by J. P. Morgan, Congress established, in 1908, a National Monetary Authority. In 1910 another, more secretive, group was formed consisting of the chiefs of major corporations and banks in this country. The group left secretly by rail from Hoboken, New Jersey, and traveled anonymously to the hunting lodge on Jekyll Island. In fact, the Clubhouse/hotel on the island has two conference rooms named for the "Federal Reserve." The meeting was so secret that none referred to the other by his last name. Why the need for secrecy?
Frank Vanderlip wrote later in the Saturday Evening Post, "...it would have been fatal to Senator Aldrich's plan to have it known that he was calling on anybody from Wall Street to help him in preparing his bill...I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System." At Jekyll Island, the true draftsman for the Federal Reserve was Paul Warburg. The plan was simple. The new central bank could not be called a central bank because America did not want one, so it had to be given a deceptive name. Ostensibly, the bank was to be controlled by Congress, but a majority of its members were to be selected by the private banks that would own its stock. To keep the public from thinking that the Federal Reserve would be controlled from New York, a system of twelve regional banks was designed. Given the concentration of money and credit in New York, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York controlled the system, making the regional concept initially nothing but a ruse.
The board and chairman were to be selected by the President, but in the words of Colonel Edward House, the board would serve such a term as to "put them out of the power of the President." The power over the creation of money was to be taken from the people and placed in the hands of private bankers who could expand or contract credit as they felt best suited their needs. Why the opposition to a central bank? Americans at the time knew of the destruction to the economy the European central banks had caused to their respective countries and to countries who became their debtors. They saw the large- scale government deficit spending and debt creation that occurred in Europe. But European financial moguls didn't rest until the New World was within their orbit. In 1902, Paul Warburg, a friend and associate of the Rothschilds and an expert on European central banking, came to this country as a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and Company.
He married the daughter of Solomon Loeb, one of the founders of the firm. The head of Kuhn, Loeb was Jacob Schiff, whose gift of $20 million in gold to the struggling Russian communists in 1917 no doubt saved their revolution. The Fed controls the banking system in the USA, not the Congress nor the people indirectly (as the Constitution dictates). The U.S. central bank strategy is a product of European banking interests. Government interventionists got their wish in 1913 with the Federal Reserve (and income tax amendment). Just in time, too, because the nation needed a new source of unlimited cash to finance both sides of WW1 and eventually our own entry to the war. After the war, with both sides owing us debt through the federal reserve backed banks, the center of finance moved from London to New York. But did the Federal Reserve reign in the money trusts and interlocking directorates? Not by a long shot. If anything, the Federal Reserve granted new powers to the National Banks by permitting overseas branches and new types of banking services. The greatest gift to the bankers, was a virtually unlimited supply of loans when they experience liquidity problems.
From the early 1920s to 1929, the monetary supply expanded at a rapid pace and the nation experienced wild economic growth. Curiously, however, the number of banks started to decline for the first time in American history. Toward the end of the period, speculation and loose money had propelled asset and equity prices to unreal levels. The stock market crashed, and as the banks struggled with liquidity problems, the Federal Reserve actually cut the money supply. Without a doubt, this is the greatest financial panic and economic collapse in American history - and it never could have happened on this scale without the Fed's intervention. The number of banks crashed and a few of the old robber barons' banks managed to swoop in and grab up thousands of competitors for pennies on the dollar.
The following docmentary is called America: From Freedom to Fascism:
America: Freedom to Fascism - Director's Authorized Version
1:51:16 - 2 years ago
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&hl=en#
This next documentary is called, The Money Masters:
The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained
Control of America 47:22
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&hl=en#
Monopoly Men (Federal Reserve Fraud) (1999)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7065177340464808778&hl=en#
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 1.5.2025 kl. 15:17 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
28.12.2009 | 15:24
BÓLUEFNI GEGN LÖMUNARVEIKI KENNT UM FARALDUR Í NÍGERÍU
Polio Vaccine Blamed for Outbreaks in Nigeria
Posted by: Dr. Mercola
December 01 2009 |
Lömunarveiki er að dreifast í Nígeríu---og heilbrigðisyfirvöld segja að í sumum tilfellum sé orsökin bóluefnið sem er notað í baráttunni við hinn lamandi sjúkdóm. Alþjóðlega heilbrigðismála stofnunin (WHO) hefur sent út viðvörun um að þessi tiltekni virus gæti breiðst út fyrir Afríku.
Meira en 120 Nígerísk börn hafa lamast á þessu ári – tvisvar sinnum fleiri bæklaðir en árið 2008.
Nígería og margar aðrar þjóðir nota lömunarveiki bóluefni sem gefið er í gegnum munn, (oral) vegna þess að það er ódýrara, einfaldara, og ver allt samfélagið..
(Innskot Agný..Hvað er að verja, ef að x aðgerð sem á að verja þig veldur því að þú smitar aðra og sjúkdómurinn dreyfist út og jafnvel stökkbreytist..?
Þetta er það rökhyggjulausasta lið sem til er! Eða "þeir" halda að okkur hinum almenna borgara verði ekki fótaskortur í vitglórunni, sem ég vona nú reyndar að við flest höfum smá af enn...þó svo við séum nú kanski að fara að verða "mutaded beast " miðað við allt DNA frá dýrum sem er í bóluefnum...)
( AGNY-What are they protecting if x procedure who is made to protect you cause you to shed the diseace and the diseace even mutate? This people has no bone in their argument -so much is for sure! Or "they" think we the public have become so stupid that we can not even make 2+2 become 4- still I hope we have not all become like a walking dead- though it is very likely we have self become mutated "beast" from all the animal DNA in the vaccines - after all -vaccines are brewed on both animal tissue and plant proteins...never wondered why all these allergie comes from? Peanut allergy- milk allergy- antibiotic allergy- this is all in the vaccine brew!)
En það er búið til úr lifandi lömunarveiki virus, sem hefur þá hættu í för með sér að valda lömunarveiki.
Í einstaka tilfellum getur virusinn í bóluefninu stökkbreyst í banvænni útgáfu sem eru kveikjan að nýjum faröldrum.
Erfðafræðilegar greiningar hafa sannað það að þannig stökkbreyttur virus hafi valdið að minnsta kosti sjö aðgreindum faröldrum í Nígeríu.
Sources: MSNBC August 14, 2009
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases
Lömunarveiki bóluefni kennt um faraldra í Nígeríu.
Stökkbreyting af lifandi virus í munntöku (oral) skömmtum tengt 124 tilfellum á þessu ári, segja sérfræðingar.
ATHUGASEMDIR DR.MERCOLA
Lömunarveiki, smitandi sjúkdómur sem orsakast af virus í þörmunum, getur valdið lömun, öndunarerfiðleikum og dauðsföllum í sinni verstu mynd.
Hvað sem því líður, þá er það SJALDNAST upplýst að í flestum tilfellum er lömunarveiki vægur sjúkdómur, veldur flensu líkum einkennum og hverfur á 2-10 dögum..
Oft á lömunarveiki sér stað og sýnir alls engin
einkenni.
Mayo Clinicstates: segir jafnvel. „Meiri hluti fólks sem smitast af lömunarveiki virusnum verða ekki veikir, og verða þess aldrei áskynja að þeir hafi sýkst af lömunarveiki.“
Annað sem gæti valdið þér undrun, er að öll lömunarveiki (polio) tilfellin, sem hafa orðið eftir að lömunarveiki bóluefnið kom til sögunnar í þróunarlöndunum, voru af völdum bóluefnisins. the vaccineitself
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx
Mayo Clinic heldur áfram:
Í Bandaríkjunum var síðasta tilfellið af villtri lömunarveiki- lömunarveiki af náttúrulegum orsökum—árið 1979, en ekki af völdum bóluefnisins sem inniheldur lifandi virus.“
Nígería hefur líka þurft að takast á við lömunarveiki faraldra sem hafa orsakast af sjálfu lömunarveiki bóluefninu!
Þjóðin hefur þurft að takast á við að minnsta kosti sjö einstök tilfelli lömunarveiki faraldra sem orsökuðust vegna stökkbreysts lömunarveiki viruss, frá lömunarveiki bóluefninu sjálfu, samkvæmt því sem sjúkdómsvarnareftirlit (CDC) Bandaríkjanna skýrir frá.
according to the U.S. Centers for DiseaseControl and Prevention..
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases
HVERNIG VELDUR LÖMUNARVEIKI BÓLUEFNIÐ LÖMUNARVEIKI?
Nígería og margar aðrar fátækari þjóðir nota munntöku (oral) bóluefni sem inniheldur lifandi lömunarveiki virus.
Lifandi virusinn getur ekki bara valdið lömunarveiki hjá bólusettum einstaklingum, hann getur stökkbreyst í jafnvel enn hættulegra afbrigði og kveikt nýjafaraldra.
Til dæmis átti sér stað faraldur á Haiti og Dóminiska lýðveldinu (DominicanRepublic) árið 2002 sem rakinn var til afbrigðis af munntöku lömunarveiki bóluefnis (OPV) sem stökkbreyttist í skætt afbrigði. a strain of oralpolio vaccine (OPV) that mutated
Öll tilfelli af lömunarveiki sem hafa átt sér stað í Bandaríkjunnum eftir 1979 hafa orsakst af bóluefninu sjálfu sem inniheldur lifandi virusa.
Samkvæmt skýrslum frá Neil Z. Miller hjá Alþjóðlegu bólusetningarstofnuninni, þá getur lifandi lömunarveiki virusinn frá bóluefninu, verið til staðar í hálsi þínum í 1-2 vikur og í hægðunum getur hann verið allt að 2 mán..
Þannig..það er ekki einungis bóluefnis þeginn sem verður í hættu,
heldur getur hann/hún hugsanlega smitað sjúkdómnum svo lengi sem
virusinn er í hægðunum.
Árið 1999 fyrirskipaði Ráðgjafa nefnd ónæmisaðgerða (ACIP) að Bandaríkin skiftu út því sem eftir er til af lifandi –virus bóluefninu með ´´dauðu“ óvirku virus bóluefni.
Hvað sem því líður, þá hefur óvirka lömunarveiki virus bóluefnið heldur ekki verið án fjölda alvarlegra aukaverkana.
Tengsl á milli lömunarveiki bóluefnisins og krabbameins.
Á árunum 1950 -1960, var lömunarveiki bóluefnið sem enn er gefið i Bandaríkjunum, venjulega 4 sinnum á 16 fyrstu mánuðum barnsins, mjög mengað af SV40, apa virus, sem hafði komist í bóluefnið á meðan á framleiðslu ferlinu stóð. ( Frumur úr nýrum apa, þar sem SV40 þreifst, var notað til að þróa lömunarveiki bóluefni.)
Í tilraunastofu prófunum uppgötvaðist það, að virusinn olli fjölda ólíkra tegunda krabbameins, þar á meðal krabbameini í heila, og núna er SV40 að koma fram hjá fjölda fólks, sem eru með lungnakrabbamein, heilakrabbamein, beinkrabba og sogæðaeitla krabbamein.
Samkvæmt höfundum bókarinnar The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus,Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed
http://www.sv40foundation.org/Book-VV.html
Virusinn og bóluefnið:
Sönn saga af Krabbameins-valdandi Apa Virus, Menguðu Lömunarveiki Bóluefni, og Miljónir Berskjaldaðra Bandaríkjamann, þá neituðu leiðandi vísindamenn og yfirmenn stjórnvalda því að endurtaka rannsóknina sem sýndi að SV40 væri í bóluefninu, og jafnvel enn í dag eru vel þekktar umboðsskrifstofur sem vísa rannsóknar niðurstöðunum á bug.
Virusinn er jafnvel að koma fram hjá börnum sem voru of ung til að hafa fengið mengaða bóluefnið, og sumir sérfræðingar eru núna að gefa það í skyn að mengandi virusinn hafi verið í lömunarveiki bóluefninu allt til síðla árs 1999.
Það vegna slíkrar áhættu sem að Barbara Loe Fisher, stofnandi NationalVaccine Information Center, sagði:
"Með vaxandi sönnunargögnum um að kross-tegunda flutningur virusa geti átt sér stað, þá ættu Bandaríkin að hætta að nota dýravefi við bóluefna framleiðslu.“
Þetta er einnig sama ástæða fyrir því að Donald Miller, hjartaskurðlæknir og professor í skurðlækningum við Washington Háskóla, stingur upp á hér
User-Friendly Vaccination Schedule, það..að ef þú velur að láta bólusetja barnið þitt gegn lömunarveiki, að þú biðjir um óvirkt /dautt virus bóluefni, sem ræktað er í manns frumum, ekki í nýrnafrumum úr öpum.
Hvernig þú minnkar áhættuna á lömunarveiki með því að forðast sykur.
Lömunarveiki er ekki algeng í Bandaríkjunum, en er vandamál í mörgum löndum.
Jæja...vissir þú að þú getur minnkað hættuna á að fá þennan sjúkdóm bara með því að minnka sykurneyslu þína?
Það er til fjöldinn allur af rannsóknum sem sýna fram á það, við það að neyta unnins sykurs þá eykur þú hættunaá að fá lömunarveiki... refined sugar increases your risk of contracting polio.
Samkvæmt einni slíkri rannsókn er efni sem myndast við hreinsunarferlið á sykrinum, svo sem eins og deoxsykur, er talið að það geti verið orsakavaldur að lömunarveiki.....
Jafnvel þó að lömunarveiki virusinn sé til staðar á meðal íbúanna, þá er samt ekki líklegt að þú fáir hana nema þú neytir unnins sykurs í mjög miklu óhófi.
Ein af stærstu og áhrifaríkustu rannsóknar dæmunum sem ég get deilt með ykkur sem styðja þessa óvæntu niðurstöðu, kemur frá dýra tilraunum sem var gerð fyrir 50 árum síðan..
Rannsóknaraðilarnir reyndu ítrekað að sýkja kanínur með lömunarveiki, en það bar ekki árangur fyrr en þeir lækkuðu blóðsykurs magnið hjá kanínunum með því að sprauta þær með insulin, lowered the rabbits' blood sugarlevels with insulin injections,, sem trúlega bæklaði ónæmiskerfi kanínanna og olli því að þær sýktust af lömunarveiki..
Lömunarveiki og aðrir smitsjúkdómar, virðast aðeins valda aukaverkunum þegar ónæmiskerfi okkar er veiklað, sem getur auðveldlega skeð vegna lélegrar næringrar, stress og ónógs svefn.
Lömunarveiki bóluefnið er ekki aðal lausnin til þess að koma í veg fyrir þennan sjúkdóm..
Á móti því að hlaða þig upp af bóluefnum, þá gæti það að takmarka sykur notkun þína, verið áhrifaríkasta aðgerðin sem þú gerir til þess að bæta heilsu þína almennt, þar sem það hjálpar til þess að halda ónæmiskerfi þínu sterku, sem mun skila sér í því að minnka hættuna á því að þú fáir fjöldann allan af sjúkdómum, þar á meðal lömunarveiki..
ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ.
Læt hér slóðir inn á aðrar þýðingar mínar um samskonar málefni.
More post´s about same object on the links there.
ARGENTÍNSK STJÓRNVÖLD RANNSAKA DAUÐSFÖLL BÓLUSETTRA BARNA.
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/637512
LÖMUNARVEIKI Í NÍGERÍU RAKIN TIL STÖKKBREYTTS BÓLUEFNIS..
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/356536
LÆKNAR OG VÍSINDAMENN FORDÆMA BÓLUSETNINGAR.
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/348959
Bólusetningar orsök og aukaverkanir.
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/330190
RelatedLinks:
SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: NowBeyond Coincidence?
SV40,LÖMUNARVEIKI BÓLUEFNI OG KRABBAMEIN, LANGT ÚT FYRIR MÖRK TILVILJANA.
Simian Virus 40 DNA Found In US Children
Fructose: This Addictive Commonly Used Food Feeds Cancer Cells, Triggers Weight Gain, and Promotes Premature Aging
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx
Polio Linked to Sugar Consumption
LÖMUNARVEIKI TENGT VIÐ NEYSLU SYKURS.
Vaccine Confirmed as Source of PolioOutbreak
BÓLUEFNI STAÐFEST SEM ORSAKAVALDUR LÖMUNARVEIKI FARALDS.
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 31.3.2016 kl. 00:18 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (4)
29.11.2009 | 22:19
SJOKKERANDI VIÐVÖRUN : FÓSTURLÁT AF VÖLDUM H1N1 SVÍNAFLENSU BÓLUEFNISINS.
-Swine Flu Alert -- Shocking Vaccine Miscarriage Horror Stories
Heilbrigðis yfirvöld Bandaríkjanna hafa sett ófrískar konur í hæsta áhættu hópinn til að fá H1N1 svínaflensubóluefnið, en er þetta í reynd öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur og þeirra börn?
Staðreyndin er sú, að á innihalds lýsingu svínaflensu bóluefnisins segir að það hafi ekki verið rannsakað með tilliti til þess, hvort það sé öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur.
Og fósturláts skýrslur frá ófrískum konum sem hafa verið bólusettar með H1N1 svínaflensu bóluefninu eru byrjaðar að streyma inn frá öllum þjóðum..
( Innskot Agný. Þetta er fínt...þeir eru sko að nota bóluefnið til þess að fækka mannkyninu..það er í raun það sem allt þetta flensu faralds propaganda áróður snýst um...Sama hvaða nafni faraldurinn nefnist...Svínaflensa 1976, West Nile virus, SARS, fuglaflensa..en þeim gekk ekki nógu vel að gera þetta að heimsfaraldri..en trikkið er að setja x veirur með í t.d árlega flensubóluefnið..og volia þú verður undarlega veikur rétt eftir bólusetninguna..sorry geta liðið upp í 2 vikur...nú..eða að þú hrekkur uppaf..ekk isíst ef þú ert í þessum víðfræga „áhættu“hóp..sem þýðir að þú ert með langvinnan sjúkdóm, undirliggjandi sjúkdóm, sem setur þig í þann hóp að þér er eiginlega skipað/mandatory að fara í sprautuna..
Ja reyndar falla heilbrigðisstarfstéttir líka þarna inn..herinn, lögreglan og slökkviliðsmenn...allavega í USA.. Líkaminn hefur bara miki meira en nóg djobb við að berjast við sjúkdómana sem fyrir eru, til að geta búið til mótefni...þannig að viðkomandi fær sjúkdóminn sem bólusetningin á að vera gegn.. Utan við öll önnur efni sem eru í bóluefninu...hvað með þá sem eru með óþol fyrir eggjum? Öll flensu bóluefni eru ræktuð í kjúklinga fósturvísi... þar að auki er mesta kvikasilfur/THIMEROSAL magnið í flensubóluefninu miðað við önnur bóluefni...
Thimerosal er líka í öðrum bóluefnum..þar á meðal er það í TWINRIX ADULT og TWINRIX PEDIATRIC bóluefninu sem er gegn lifrarbólgu A og B og er notað hér á landi bæði fyrir fullorðna og börn..Þó svo Thimerosal sé ekki í PRIORIX sem er MMR = mislingar, rauðir hundar oghettusótt bóluefnið sem notað er hér á landi...og hefur verið af mörgum tengt við autism/einhverfu..
SET SLÓÐIR HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN ÞAR SEM ÞIÐ GETIÐ KYNNT YKKUR MÁLIÐ SJÁLF EF ÁHUGI ER FYRIR HENDI.)
Slóðin hér fyrir neðan inniheldur sögur sem munu gera þig reiða/n og sjokkeraðan. Ef þú ert ófrísk móðir, viltu þá vera svo væn að fara EKKI í H1N1 svínaflensu bólusetninguna!
Í staðinn, gerðu allt sem þú mögulega getur til að forðast almennings stað, og vertu viss um að þú þvoir þér enn betur og oftar um hendurnar en þú ert vön.
Rannsakaðu og kynntu þér allar þær náttúrulegu aðferðir sem eru til, til þess að bægja flensunni frá..
Þýðandi Agný.
Sources:
Organic Health November 11,2009
Is The H1N1 Vaccine Safe? Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had
Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine
Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog
From Krissi Danielsson, Former About.com Guide since 2007
The hype and hysteria over H1N1 Swine Flu has intensified worldwide without enough proper information about it.
Flu WasNot the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic
Flu Was Not the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic
Flu may not have killed most in 1918 pandemic
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5146PD20090205?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews&sp=true
CanadaLooks at Vitamin D for Swine Flu Protection
ALERT:Special Swine Flu Update
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu-Update.aspx
SwineFlu -- One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History
ObamaDeclares Swine Flu Emergency
Algeng tenging við dauðsföll af völdum svínaflensu.
Ný rannsókn sem gerð var hjá Sjúkdómsvarnar eftirlitinu(CDC) uppgötvaði það að þau 36 börn sem látist höfðu af völdum H1N1 frá April – Agust þá höfðu einstaklingarnir engin krónísk heilsufars vandmál. En öll áttu þau við bakteríu sýkingar að stríða á sama tíma.
Sú mest algenga sýking sem var til staðar sem olli flensu tengdum dauðsföllum, var staphylococcus aureus. Við berum það helst í nefi og/eða húðinni.. Flensan veldur efri loftvega skemmdum, og býr til greiða leið fyrir staphs inn í lungun..
Þýðandi Agný.
Sources:
Diseases - In -The - Vaccinated 1
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated
http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/proof-that-european-h1n1-vaccines-contain-mercury-squalene-and-tween-80/
Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated 2
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated-Page-2
Vaccine Injury Photos From The CDC
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccine-Injury-Photos-From-The-CDC
ER ÞETTA SVÍNA FLENSU AFBRIGÐI SÝKLAVOPN?
IS THIS VERSION OF SWINE FLU A BIO-WEAPON?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/7/
SWINE FLU HEFUR MÖGULEGA ORÐIÐ TIL VEGNA MANNLEGRA
MISTAKA VIÐ BÓLUEFNA FRAMLEIÐSLU.
SWINE FLU GET A LIVE BECAUSE OF MISTAKES IN VACCINE MAKING..
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/5/
HEFUR BAXTER LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE?
HAS BAXTER INTERNATIONAL RELEASED BIO-WEAPON IN UKRAINE?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/978492/
BÓLUSETTUR MEÐ VALDI OG LÖGBOÐIÐ RFID FYLGT EFTIR MEÐ HERVALDI. VIDEOS
Forced vaccinations: a whistleblower's clear warning - Project Camelot
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/952875/
ÖREINDAR ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS ?
Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/974102/
URGENT WARNING H5N1 DNAin Flu Vaccine.
VIDEO Fínt að hafa fuglaflensu veiruna með
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/827643/
Warning...Hybrid Bird Flu About To Be Released?
FEMA líkkisturnar tilbúnar...FEMA COFFINS ARE READY!
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/4/
The bird/swine flu is man made.
FUGLA/ SVÍNA FLENSAN ER BÚIN TIL AF MÖNNUM!!
ER MEXIKANSKA SVÍNAFLENSAN SÝKLAVOPN?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/869772/
Five die after seasonal flu vaccination
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2911318
The New York Times mentions an 8-year-old boy from LongIsland who died roughly a week after receiving a seasonal flu vaccine
Flu Vaccine Ruins Beautiful Redskins Cheerleader
http://www.nfljuice.com/2009/10/20/flu-vaccine-ruins-beautiful-redskins-cheerleader/
Last year, a 6-year-old girl from Colorado died after getting the FluMist vaccine
U.S. Government Ignores Flu Vaccine Death
A Review of Four Approved Swine Flu Vaccines’ Ingredients
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/05/Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx
The National Vaccine InformationCenter (NVIC )
http://www.nvic.org/ is calling for a comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals for all health outcomes, and I believe it would be prudent to do so.
Flu Vaccine may Lead to Asthma in Infants
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/04/14/flu-vaccines-part-one.aspx
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/10/04/flumist-vaccine.aspx
Girl’s FluDeath Happened Within Hours
Fjölmiðlar | Breytt 23.7.2015 kl. 05:02 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (7)
Nota bene
Translate your website into 52 languages
We The People Will Not Be Chipped!
NO VERICHIP INSIDE ME! I WILL NOT BE MARKED AS I WERE A BEAST!
http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/main/news.php
Efni
RSSNýjustu færslur
- Viðvörun frá Þýskalandi: Dauðsföll vegna "bóluefnis" gegn KÓv...
- Hvítir trefjalíkir blóðtappar finnast í miljónum þeirra sem t...
- Japan varar við mikilli aukningu dauðsfalla meðal bólusettra ...
- Slóvakía varar við því að banvæn ótilgreind efni fundust í Co...
- "GRAPHEN OXIDE" FRAMHALD UM EFNIÐ SEM YFIRTEKUR!!! “THE BLAC...
Bloggvinir
-
666
-
annasteinunn
-
artboy
-
athena
-
berglindnanna
-
bergthora
-
biddam
-
birgitta
-
bofs
-
brylli
-
coke
-
daystar
-
dofri
-
doriborg
-
ea
-
ellyarmanns
-
estersv
-
fridaeyland
-
gammon
-
gmaria
-
gudrunmagnea
-
gullvagninn
-
gunnipallikokkur
-
habbakriss
-
halkatla
-
hallarut
-
halldorbaldursson
-
hallurg
-
handtoskuserian
-
heida
-
heidathord
-
heidistrand
-
heimskringla
-
hjolagarpur
-
hlynurh
-
hlynurha
-
id
-
ingo
-
ipanama
-
ippa
-
jensgud
-
joninaben
-
jorunn
-
josira
-
kallimatt
-
ketilas08
-
kiddih
-
kiddijoi
-
kiddip
-
killerjoe
-
killjoker
-
kiza
-
kollaogjosep
-
konur
-
limped
-
lovelikeblood
-
lydurarnason
-
malacai
-
mia-donalega
-
molta
-
morgunstjarna
-
nonniblogg
-
ofurbaldur
-
olafurfa
-
omar
-
omarragnarsson
-
overmaster
-
perlaheim
-
poppoli
-
prakkarinn
-
predikarinn
-
proletariat
-
ragnargests
-
rheidur
-
rosabla
-
saethorhelgi
-
salist
-
sigurjonn
-
sigurjonth
-
sirrycoach
-
sjos
-
stebbifr
-
svarthamar
-
sveinnhj
-
tharfagreinir
-
trollchild
-
tru
-
upplystur
-
vertu
-
vglilja
-
vitale
-
alla
-
dufa65
-
andres08
-
gumpurinn
-
danna
-
arit-bloggar
-
apalsson
-
taoistinn
-
asgrimurhartmannsson
-
heiddal
-
brahim
-
gattin
-
brandarar
-
rafdrottinn
-
saxi
-
eysi
-
fafnisbani
-
fiskurinn
-
geiragustsson
-
morgunn
-
gudjonelias
-
gjonsson
-
lostintime
-
tilveran-i-esb
-
conspiracy
-
skodun
-
holi
-
vulkan
-
heim
-
hildurhelgas
-
drum
-
truthseeker
-
holmdish
-
don
-
danjensen
-
ingaghall
-
johannvegas
-
jonasg-eg
-
jonasg-egi
-
joningic
-
jonmagnusson
-
alda111
-
bisowich
-
andmenning
-
kristinthormar
-
lotta
-
ludvikludviksson
-
astroblog
-
vistarband
-
marinomm
-
manisvans
-
minnhugur
-
bylting-strax
-
olafur-62
-
pallvil
-
ljosmyndarinn
-
perlaoghvolparnir
-
bjornbondi99
-
shhalldor
-
infowarrioreggeiri
-
sigvardur
-
thorthunder
-
thee
-
tigercopper
-
vefritid
-
zordis
-
tsiglaugsson
-
thordisb
Nýjustu myndir
Nýjustu myndböndin
Heimsóknir
Flettingar
- Í dag (6.6.): 4
- Sl. sólarhring: 8
- Sl. viku: 66
- Frá upphafi: 319187
Annað
- Innlit í dag: 3
- Innlit sl. viku: 53
- Gestir í dag: 3
- IP-tölur í dag: 3
Uppfært á 3 mín. fresti.
Skýringar
201 dagur til jóla
Um bloggið
Hitt og þetta...aðallega hitt...
Eldri færslur
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Nýjustu færslurnar
- Hálauna eða láglaunaþjóð?
- Hin nýja ríkisstjórn gerir allt til að rýra eignarhald sjávarútvegsfyrirtækja á auðlindum Íslands til að auðvelda take over fyrir EU.
- FEÐGARNIR ?
- Gæti þetta verið eitthvað sem að allir jarðarbúar mættu leggja meiri áherslu á; AÐ FRAMLEIÐA ÁBURÐ / NÆRINGU fyrir allar innijurtir:
- FERILL ÞESSA MÁLS HJÁ NÚVERANDI DÓMSMÁLARÁÐHERRA ER SÍÐUR EN SVO HENNI TIL FRAMDRÁTTAR......
Tenglar
Uppáhalds síður
Margvísleg málefni.
Ýmsir vefir.
- Velvirk börn Félag hæfileikaríkra og skapandi einstaklinga
- Heilsubankinn Meðferðar og þjónustuaðilar
- Sannleikurinn minn Fróðleikur um ýmis heilsumál
- Heimasíðan mín Ýmislegt efni.
- Gagnauga Gagnauga er upplýsingavefur um alþjóðamál
- MSSPJALLIÐ Opið Spjallborð um MS
- Ablechild.org Parents for Label and Drug Free Education
- ASPARTAME KILLS Rumsfeld og Aspartame
- Óvenjuleg og umdeild mál 9/11, samsæriskenningar...
- The National Foundation for Gifted and Creative Children Samtök hæfileikaríkra og skapandi barna
- Upplýsingasíða um MSG If MSG isn´t harmful, why is it hidden?
- Spjallborð um 911 og ýmislegt plott
- Þessi síða er alveg must read ýmislegt sem þú sérð bara hér
- The SPECTRUM Ýmsar greinar
- Label Me Sane Fjallað um ofnotkun lyfja.
- Alliance for Human Research Protection Samtök gegn tilraunum á fólki
- Organic Consumers Association Neytendasamtök fyrir lífrænt
- Freedom Or Facism ? Frelsi eða Facismi?
- Health Truth Revealed Hulunni svipt af heilsu málefnum
- Quackpot Watch "The last days of the Quackbusters "
- True Torah Jews/Jews Against Zionism Traditional Jews Are Not Zionists
- Question 911.com Free DVD download / frítt niðurhal
Talnaspeki / Numerology
Fróðleikur um þessa speki
- Sun - Angel Numerology Frítt dæmi þarna
- Free Numerology Reading Meira en bara talnaspeki..
- Your Reading / Agny Lýsingin á mér...
- INDIGO intentions Tarot, numerology, Indigo children, Reiki, Angels reading
Fyndið stuff.
Myndir, brandarar og glens.
- Cartoons Teiknimyndir
Andleg málefni
Allt sem tengist þeim málum.
- AEROSOL OPERATION CRIMES & COVER-UP SPRAYING US AS A BUG..
- Crystalinks Þessi síða er hreinlega með allt.
- Tarot Cards & Free Readings Frí Tarot spá
- Mind Power News Kraftur hugans.
- Progressive Awareness Research Allt mögulegt andans stuff.
- Tilvitnanir / quotes Ýmsar tilvitnanir
- New Jersey ghost hunter center Drauga "veiðar"
- The Tree of the Golden Light Ýmis andleg mál
- Mayan Calendar Articles Tímatal Mayanna
Stjörnuspeki / Astrology
Fróðleikur um þessa speki.
- The Future Minders Frítt dæmi þarna
Síður um ADD / ADHD
Upplýsingar um athyglisbrest / ofvirkni.
- Dr. Mary Ann Block ,, Find the course, fix the problem".
- A Multisensory Learning Program Kennslugögn fyrir ADD / Autism / Dyslexia
- Exposing the Fraud of ADD and ADHD Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD Neurologist, Pediatric Neurology
- Stimulant Drugs for ADHD and ADD Örvandi lyf við ADHD og ADD
- "Are Psychiatrists Betraying Their Patients?" Eru geðlæknar að svíkja sjúklingana sína?
- "Our Toxic World" " Okkar eitraði heimur"
- No proof mental illness rooted in biology Engin líffræðileg sönnun fyrir geðsjúkdómum
- Death From Ritalin Snannleikurinn á bak við ADHD
- Methylphenidate ( virka efnið í Ritalin) Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section
- What Drugmakers of ADD & ADHD Drugs vilja ekki að þú vitir
- Answers for ADHD Questions Svör við ADHD spurningum.
SSRI lyf og önnur þunglyndislyf
Ýmsar síður um hugarfars breytandi lyf.
- Dangerous Medicine forum Spjallborð
- Antidepressants Facts Staðreyndir um þunglyndislyf.
- SSRI Stories Ekki er sannleikurinn fallegur...
- International Coalition For Drug Awareness Verum meðvituð ...
- PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN NOW Verndum börnin okkar!!
- THE DARK SIDE OF PSYCHIATRY Dökka hlið geðlækninganna
- How psychiatry is making drug addicts out of America´s shool children Amerísk skólabörn gerð að læknadóps fíklum.
- Psyhchiatric Drug Side Effects Search Engine.
- Psyhchiatric Drug Side Effects Search Engine. SEARCH ENGINE
Asperger syndrome og Autism
Síður sem fjalla um Asperger og einhverfu
- Aspergers Syndrome in Children Góð síða (mín skoðun)
Blogg úr ýmsum áttum..
Vinir / áhugaverðir einstaklingar.
- Sigurjón Þórðar.
- Nornin
- Tigra
- Anna panna
- Þarfagreinir
- Katrín ódæla
- Klisja
- Olasteina "Fjarskyld frænka"
- Nornin Vinkona af Baggalút.
- Geiri 3d.
- Laramin
- Sigunzo
- Ditto bloggar Yndisleg og spes manneskja.
AGLOCO
- AGLOCO Borgað fyrir að browsa..
http://skorrdal.com/
MICROCHIP - RFID
- Microchip Implants News Articles MIND CONTROL; ÖRFLÖGUMERKINGAR; RFID
UMDEILD MÁLEFNI
- WIDE EYE CINEMA WIDE EYE CINEMA is dedicated to showcasing the very best alternative truth-related documentaries & cinema uploaded onto the World-Wide Web.
MY FAVORITE SITES
- This site is number 1 on 10 black list sites of US gov. Here you find it all.Specially what the elite do not want you to find
- Alvaran Forum about what some call conspiracy
- Prophecies of Sollog Sollog is a POLITICAL PRISONER of the USA!
- Ingaoramas video VIDEOS
- So you wanna talk conspiracies? try this on for size. JUST GO THERE...
- ConCen An eye openinger
- What you should not know...is here.. Knowing litle about lot is better than know lot about a little...
HAARP
- Chemtrails Data Page Chemtrails - Frequently Asked Questions
CHEMTRAILS
- CHEMTRAIL CENTRAL Þetta er forum um Chemtrails og málefni tengd efna úðun úr lofti..
- Chemtrails news, articles and information Cemtrails=Efnarákir
- CHEMTRAILS -HAARP-GEOENGIERING-DEPOPULATION AT WORK CHEMTRAILS síða- fyrrverandi FBI starfsmaður leysir t.d. frá skjóðunni- núna látinn..
- Efnaúðun -veðurfarsstjórnun í gegnum chemtrails Cemtrails=Efnarákir- Ísland er ekki undanskilið þessu ógeði!
- Chemtrails = Aerosol spraying to change the atmosphere. Chemtrails = Aerosol spraying of barium, "fibers", pathogens.
- Efnaúðun -veðurfarsstjórnun í gegnum chemtrails Cemtrails=Efnarákir
TRANSLATE-ÞÝÐA
- Translate your website into 52 languages Just copy and paste the Translate This Button anywhere on your site, it's free and easy. There are no files to upload and it works on almost any website. The Translate This Button is a lightweight JavaScript translation widget. It translates any page quickly using Ajax and the brilliant Google Translate.
VERICHIP-WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT BE CHIPPED!
Færsluflokkar
- Bloggar
- Bækur
- Dægurmál
- Evrópumál
- Ferðalög
- Fjármál
- Fjölmiðlar
- Heilbrigðismál
- Heilsumálefni
- Kvikmyndir
- Lífstíll
- Ljóð
- Löggæsla
- Mannréttindi
- Matur og drykkur
- Menning og listir
- Menntun og skóli
- Óvenjuleg og umdeild mál
- Samgöngur
- Spaugilegt
- Spil og leikir
- Stjórnmál og samfélag
- Trúmál
- Trúmál og siðferði
- Tölvur og tækni
- Umhverfismál
- Utanríkismál/alþjóðamál
- Vefurinn
- Viðskipti og fjármál
- Vinir og fjölskylda
- Vísindi og fræði
