Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet, says John P. Holdren Obama´s science Car.

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/ 

http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=576
Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens. 

The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both? 

These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar.

In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that: 

• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not; 
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food; 
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise; 
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized. 
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force. 

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.

No one in their right mind would say such things. 

Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed. 

[UPDATE: Make sure to read the new statements issued by the White House and by John Holdren's office in response to the controversy raised by this essay -- you can see them below following the Ecoscience excerpts, or you can jump directly to the statements by clicking here.] 

This report was originally inspired by this article in FrontPage magazine, which covers some of the same information given here. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. Why not? Because, as I discovered when discussing the article with various friends, there was no proof that the quotes were accurate -- so most folks (even those opposed to Obama's policies) doubted their veracity, because the statements seemed too inflammatory to be true. In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence. 

Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time (late 1970s) was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: overpopulation. He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem. Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: personally, I don't think it's a valid excuse at all, since the crisis he was in a panic over was mostly in his imagination. Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible. 

Direct quotes from John Holdren's Ecoscience 

Below you will find a series of ten short passages from Ecoscience. On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me. 

Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context. 

And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans (and photos) of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context." 

Ready? Brace yourself. And prepare to be shocked. 

Page 837: 

Compulsory abortions would be legal 

Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.

As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded." Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that's whom. What Holdren's really saying here is, "I have determined that there's nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies."

And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there's no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for "compulsory population-control laws." In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that "the population crisis" has already become "sufficiently severe to endanger the society." 

Page 786:

Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions 

One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.

Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what's especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals -- wrenching babies from their mothers' arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not -- but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don't be fooled by the innocuous and "level-headed" tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed. 

Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily. 

This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I'm reminded of the phrase "banality of evil." 

Not that it matters, but I myself am "pro-choice" -- i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn't mean I'm pro-abortion -- I don't particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. One doesn't need to be a "pro-life" activist to see the horror of this proposal -- people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic. 

There's a bumper sticker that's popular in liberal areas which says: "Against abortion? Then don't have one." Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you're against it or not. 

Page 787-8:

Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock 

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.

OK, John, now you're really starting to scare me.

Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that'd be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government. 

Page 786-7: 

The government could control women's reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control 

Involuntary fertility control A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.  The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.

Note well the phrase "with official permission" in the above quote. Johh Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don't. 

Page 838:

The kind of people who cause "social deterioration" can be compelled to not have children 

If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.

To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book -- and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone -- but those who "contribute to social deterioration" could be "forced to exercise reproductive responsibility" which could only mean one thing -- compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to "force" people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people's bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No -- the only way to "force" people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions. 

But what manner of insanity is this? "Social deterioration"? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that "some" people contribute to social deterioriation more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn't that eugenics, plain and simple?

And isn't eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice? 

We've already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was "feeble-minded" and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity. 

The italicized phrase at the end ("providing they are not denied equal protection"), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn't be racially based or discriminatory -- merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren's America determines that you are "contributing to social deterioration" by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people. 

No no, you say, Holdren isn't claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he's stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more.

 If so -- how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or -- most disturbingly of all -- perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book. 

Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn't looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don't you just get your tubes tied already? But it's a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it's not so funny anymore. 

Page 838: 

Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size 

In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? 

Why? 

I'll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual's body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime? 

I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holgren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures. 

Page 942-3:

A "Planetary Regime" should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born 

Toward a Planetary Regime Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, andincluding all food on the international market.  The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.

In case you were wondering exactly who would enforce these forced abortion and mass sterilization laws: Why, it'll be the "Planetary Regime"! Of course! I should have seen that one coming. 

The rest of this passage speaks for itself. Once you add up all the things the Planetary Regime (which has a nice science-fiction ring to it, doesn't it?) will control, it becomes quite clear that it will have total power over the global economy, since according to Holdren this Planetary Regime will control "all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable" (which basically means all goods) as well as all food, and commerce on the oceans and any rivers "that discharge into the oceans" (i.e. 99% of all navigable rivers). What's left? Not much. 

Page 917: 

We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force 

If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involvespartial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.

The other shoe drops. So: We are expected to voluntarily surrender national sovereignty to an international organization (the "Planetary Regime," presumably), which will be armed and have the ability to act as a police force. And we saw in the previous quote exactly which rules this armed international police force will be enforcing: compulsory birth control, and all economic activity. 

It would be laughable if Holdren weren't so deadly serious. Do you want this man to be in charge of science and technology in the United States? Because he already is in charge. 

Page 749:

Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism 

Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the "tragedy of the commons," wherein the "commons" is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint.

This passage is not particularly noteworthy except for the inclusion of the odd phrase "pronatalist attitude," which Holdren spends much of the book trying to undermine. And what exactly is a "pronatalist attitude"? Basically it means the urge to have children, and to like babies. If only we could suppress people's natural urge to want children and start families, we could solve all our problems! 

What's disturbing to me is the incredibly patronizing and culturally imperialist attitude he displays here, basically acting like he has the right to tell every ethnic group in the world that they should allow themselves to go extinct or at least not increase their populations any more. How would we feel if Andaman Islanders showed up on the steps of the Capitol in Washington D.C. and announced that there were simply too many Americans, and we therefore are commanded to stop breeding immediately? One imagines that the attitude of every ethnic group in the world to John Holdren's proposal would be: Cram it, John. Stop telling us what to do. 

Page 944

As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000 

Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny.Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world.

This is the final paragraph of the book, which I include here only to show how embarrassingly inaccurate his "scientific" projections were. In 1977, Holdren thought we were teetering on the brink of global catastrophe, and he proposed implementing fascistic rules and laws to stave off the impending disaster. Luckily, we ignored his warnings, yet the world managed to survive anyway without the need to punish ourselves with the oppressive society which Holdren proposed. Yes, there still is overpopulation, but the problems it causes are not as morally repugnant as the "solutions" which John Holdren wanted us to adopt. 

I actually don't disagree with everything Holdren says. I agree with him that overpopulation is a problem, and that much of the environmental degradation that has happened is due in large part to overpopulation (mostly in the developing world). Where we disagree is in the solution. While Holdren does occasionally advocate for milder solutions elsewhere in the book, his basic premise is that the population explosion has gotten so out of control that only the most oppressive and totalitarian measures can possibly stop humanity from stripping the planet bare and causing a catastrophe beyond our imagining. Holdren has (apparently) no problem saying we should force people to not have children, by any means necessary. And that is where we part ways. I draw the line at even the hint of compulsory compliance to draconian laws about pregnancy and abortion; Holdren does not hesitate to cross that line without a second thought. 

My solution would be to adopt social policies that are known to lead to voluntary and non-coercive trends toward a lower birth rate: increased education for girls in poor countries, better access to (voluntarily adopted) birth control, higher standards of living. In fact, population trends since 1977 have started to level off in the crisis areas of Asia and Latin America, primarily due to better standards of living and better education, which are known to decrease population growth. These non-oppressive policies appear to be sufficient to control the population -- and Holdren's decades-long panic attack seems to be unfounded. 

Now, consider all the recommendations by Holdren given above, and then note that at his Senate confirmation hearing he said he would "keep policy free from politics" if confirmed. In fact Holdren has repeatedly said that science should not be be tainted by politics, telling the BBC just a few days ago that "he wanted to take the politics out of scientific advice." But have you ever seen more politicized science-policy recommendations than those given in Ecoscience? 

For the doubters and the naysayers...
There are five possible counter-claims which you might make against this report: 

1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax. 
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context. 
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them. 
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable. 
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now. 

I'll address each in turn:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax. 
Scroll to the bottom of this page, and look at the photos of the book -- especially the last two photos, showing the book opened to pages quoted in this report. Then look at the full-page scans directly above those photos, showing each page mentioned here in full, unaltered. What more proof do you need? If you're still not convinced, go to any large library and check out the book yourself, and you'll see: everything I claim here is true. 

If you don't have the patience to go to a library, you can always view the actual contents of the book online for free for a brief trial period. 

2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context. 
Some have argued that the FrontPage article "takes quotes out of context," which is the very reason why I went and investigated the original book itself. Turns out that not only are the quotes not out of context, but the additional paragraphs on either side of each passage only serve to make Holdren's ideas appear even more sinister. You want context? Be careful what you ask for, because the context makes things worse. 

But yes, to satisfy the curious and the doubters, the "extended passages" and full-page scans given below provide more than sufficient context for the quotes.
In truth, I weary of the "context game" in which every controversial statement is always claimed to be "out of context," and no matter how much context is then given, it's never enough, until one must present every single word someone has ever written -- at which point the reader becomes overwhelmed and loses interest. Which is the whole point of the context game to begin with. 

3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them. 
First of all: If you are a co-author of a book, you are signing your name to it, and you must take responsibility for everything that is in that book. This is true for John Holdren and every other author.
But there's plenty more evidence than that. Most significantly, Holdren has held similar views for years and frequently wrote about them under his own name. It's not like these quotes are unexpected and came out of the blue -- they fit into a pattern of other Holdren writings and viewpoints.
Lastly, below I present full-page scans of the "Acknowledgments" pages in Ecoscience, and in those Acknowledgments pages are dozens of thank-yous to people at U.C. Berkeley -- where Holdren was a professor at the time. In fact, there are more acknowledgments involving Berkeley than anywhere else, and since Holdren was the only one of the three authors with a connection to Berkeley, they must be histhank-yous -- indicating that he wrote a substantial portion of the book. Even his wife is thanked.
I have no way of knowing if Holdren himself typed the exact words quoted on this page, but he certainly at a minimum edited them and gave them his stamp of approval. 

4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable. 
Well, if you believe that, then I guess this page holds no interest for you, and you are thereby free to ignore it. But I have a suspicion that the vast majority of Americans find the views expressed by Holdren to be alarming and abhorrent. 

5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now. 
You might argue that this book was written in a different era, during which time a certain clique of radical scientists (including Holdren) were in a frenzy over what they thought was a crisis so severe it threatened the whole planet: overpopulation. But, you could say, all that is in the past, an embarrassing episode which Holdren might wish everyone would now forget. I mean, people change their opinions all the time. Senator Robert Byrd was once in the KKK, after all, but by now he has renounced those views. Perhaps in a similar vein John Holdren no longer believes any of the things he wrote in Ecoscience, so we can't hold them against him any more. 

The White House gets involved:

Recent statements byHoldren and the Ehrlichs in response

to this controversy 

When I originally wrote and published this essay on July 10, I said: 

"Unfortunately, as far as I've been able to discover, Holdren has never disavowed the views he held in the 1970s and spelled out in Ecoscience and other books." 

However, that is no longer entirely true. On July 15, both the White House and John Holdren's office issued statements on this controversy after prodding from reporters at both the Washington Times and the Catholic News Agency. 

According to this article by Amanda Carpenter in the Washington Times, Holdren and his co-authors have now distanced themselves from the words published in Ecoscience 32 years ago. From the article:

When asked whether Mr. Holdren's thoughts on population control have changed over the years, his staff gave The Washington Times a statement that said, "This material is from a three-decade-old, three-author college textbook. Dr. Holdren addressed this issue during his confirmation when he said he does not believe that determining optimal population is a proper role of government. Dr. Holdren is not and never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization." 
... 
The White House also passed along a statement from the Ehrlichs that said, in part, "anybody who actually wants to know what we and/or Professor Holdren believe and recommend about these matters would presumably read some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times, rather than going back a third of a century to find some formulations in an encyclopedic textbook where description can be misrepresented as endorsement."

(The second quote above is from page 2 of the article.) 

The Catholic News Agency also reported on July 15,

In Tuesday e-mails to CNA, Rick Weiss, the Office of Science and Technology Policy's Director of Strategic Communications, said the material at issue was from "a three-decade-old, three-author textbook used in colleges to teach energy policy." 

He could "easily dismiss" fears that Dr. Holdren favors government control over population growth. 

"He made that quite clear in his confirmation hearing," Weiss said. 

He then quoted a section of the confirmation transcript in which Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) asked Holdren whether he thinks "determining optimal population is a proper role of government." 

"No, Senator, I do not," was Holdren's reply, according to Weiss and a transcript of the proceedings. 

In other remarks at the confirmation hearing, not cited by Weiss, Holdren told Sen. Vitter he no longer thinks it is "productive" to focus on the "optimum population" for the United States. "I don't think any of us know what the right answer is." 

According to Weiss, Holdren "made clear that he did not believe in coercive means of population control" and is not an advocate for measures expressed in the book "and they are certainly not endorsed by this administration in any way." 

Weiss also provided CNA with a statement from the book's other two authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich. 

The Ehrlichs said they had been "shocked" at what they called the "serious misrepresentation" of their and Holdren's views. 

"We were not then, never have been, and are not now 'advocates' of the Draconian measures for population limitation described -- but not recommended -- in the book's 60-plus small-type pages cataloging the full spectrum of population policies that, at the time, had either been tried in some country or analyzed by some commentator." 

Describing "Ecoscience" as a "textbook," they said its descriptions can be "misrepresented as endorsement."

In my original report, I challenged Holdren "to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience." 

I ask my readers: Do you think these two articles count as the renunciation and disavowal I requested? 

I'm not so sure. First of all, the disavowals were made by a spokesman and by his co-authors -- as of this writing, Holdren himself has never renounced and disavowed the contents of Ecoscience. Unless you want to count the one-sentence answer he gave during the confirmation hearing. 

Under questioning from Senator David Vitter, Holdren did backpedal a bit concerning a different statement he made in the '70s about government-controlled population levels. Does this single sentence count as an across-the-board disavowal of every single specific recommendation he made in Ecoscience as well as in many other books and articles? My opinion is Not really, but as usual I'll provide the full evidence and the full context and I'll let you decide for yourself. 

You can view the video of the confirmation hearings here (introductory page here), but be warned that it is an extremely long streaming video that doesn't work in all browsers, and the answer in question doesn't come until the 120th minute.
Because most people won't or can't view the entire video, here's a transcript of the relevant part, and you can decide for yourself whether his statement counts as a disavowal of his quotes cited in this report: 

[Starting at 120:30]

Senator David Vitter: In 1973, you encouraged "a decline in fertility well below replacement" in the United States because "280 million in 2040 is likely to be too many." What would your number for the right population in the US be today? 

John Holdren: I no longer think it's productive, Senator, to focus on the optimum population of the United States. I don't think any of us know what the right answer is. When I wrote those lines in 1973, uh, I was preoccupied with the fact that many problems the United States faced appeared to be being made more difficult by the greater population growth that then prevailed. I think everyone who studies these matters understands that population growth brings some benefits and some liabilities; it's a tough question to determine which will prevail in a given time period.

Vitter then asked, "You think determining optimal population is a proper role of government?" To which Holdren replied, "No, Senator, I do not." 

(If you want the full context of this exchange between Vitter and Holdren, a complete transcript of their entire question-and-answer session can be found posted here.) 

I'm not sure just how seriously we should take a statement made by someone during what is essentially a job interview. A few words spent reassuring the interviewer that you don't really believe all those things you spent thirty years elaborating in detail -- what else should we expect? That Holdren would say, Yes, I think the government should lower the U.S. population down to 280 million? Of course he wouldn't say that during the interview, despite what he may or may not really believe internally. 

But let's spend a moment looking at these answers more closely. Both of them referred to determining a specific number of people that should be allowed as the population of the United States. First he said it was "no longer productive" to set a hard-and-fast exact number for the population of the U.S., and then said he doesn't think we should "determine the optimal population." But that still leaves the door open for the notion that the population should be lowered by whatever means in general without a specific numerical goal in mind. Holdren still did not say that he's against population control as a concept -- only that he thinks we shouldn't set specific numeric targets. 

And more importantly in the context of this essay, he did not disavow any of the specific proposals quoted here -- forced abortion, "Planetary Regime," etc. 

Rather than a fairly vague blanket disavowal given in response to a question on a slightly different topic during the confirmation hearings, and rather than a statement given by someone in his office, and rather than a statement issued by his co-authors, I still would like to see a specific disavowal by Holdren himself. And so I repeat,

I challenge John Holdren himself to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and specific recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience; and until he does so, I will hold him responsible for those statements.

Columnist David Harsanyi, who received a similar semi-disavowal from Holdren's office, dismantles it quite effectively in an excellent piece he published on July 15 in the Denver Post, Reason Online and elsewhere. 

And who wants to take up the challenge from the Ehrlichs issued by the White House to look into "some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times" to uncover "what we and/or Professor Holdren believe"? Seems like territory ripe for exploration. Post any research you uncover either here in the comments section at zomblog, or on your own blog. Anything that John Holdren or the Ehrlichs have written since 1977 is fair game -- according to the Ehrlichs themselves. 

Before you read any further...
If you accept the self-evident veracity of these quotations, and are outraged enough already, then you can stop reading here. Very little new information is presented below. 

(And if you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.)
But if you still harbor doubts that the United States Science Czar could possibly harbor such views, and want more proof, then read on for longer and fuller citations, and full-page scans of the pages in the book, as well as photographs of the book itself. And if by chance you are a Holdren or Obama supporter, and want to falsely claim that I have taken Holdren's statements out of context, then you'd better stop reading here too, because if you go any further then you'll see that I have given full context for the quotes and conclusive evidence that they're Holdren's -- removing any basis by which you could have questioned this report. 

More Context: Complete extended passages from which the quotes above were taken 

For most of these, I will present the following extended passages without further commentary -- judge for yourself if you think the context mitigates Holdren's intent, or only worsens the impression that he's completely serious about all this. 

Page 837 full-length extended quote: 

To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however.

Let it be noted that John Holdren himself is among the few who "consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion" -- in fact, that's the entire thrust of Ecoscience, to convince everyone that overpopulation is a catastrophic crisis which requires immediate and extreme solutions. So although the final sentence of the extended passage seems at first to mollify the extreme nature of his speculation, in reality Holdren is only speaking of all the unaware masses who don't see things his way. 

Page 786 full-length extended quote: 

Social pressures on both men and women to marry and have children must be removed. As former Secretary of Interior Stewart Udall observed, "All lives are not enhanced by marital union; parenthood is not necessarily a fulfillment for every married couple." If society were convinced of the need for low birth rates, no doubt the stigma that has customarily been assigned to bachelors, spinsters, and childless couples would soon disappear. But alternative lifestyles should be open to single people, and perhaps the institution of an informal, easily dissolved "marriage" for the childless is one possibility. Indeed, many DC societies now seem to be evolving in this direction as women's liberation gains momentum. It is possible that fully developed societies may produce such arrangements naturally, and their association with lower fertility is becoming increasingly clear. In LDCs a childless or single lifestyle might be encouraged deliberately as the status of women approaches parity with that of men.  Although free and easy association of the sexes might be tolerated in such a society, responsible parenthood ought to be encouraged and illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged. One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even he possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.  Somewhat more repressive measures for discouraging large families have also been proposed, such as assigning public housing without regard for family size and removing dependency allowances from student grants or military pay. Some of these have been implemented in crowded Singapore, whose population program has been counted as one of the most successful.

In the final sentence of this passage, Holdren speaks approvingly of Singapore's infamous totalitarian micromanaging of people's daily lives. 

But to me, the most bizarre and disturbing aspect of the quote given here is that Holgren seems to think that economic disincentives to have large families are more repressive and extreme than taking away basic bodily rights. To Holdren, "removing dependency allowances from student grants" is more repressive than compelling women to have abortions against their will. A very peculiar and twisted view of the world, I must say. 

Page 787-8 full-length extended quote: 

Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.  Physiologist Melvin Ketchel, of the Tufts University School of Medicine, suggested that a sterilant could be developed that had a very specific action—for example, preventing implantation of the fertilized ovum. He proposed that it be used to reduce fertility levels by adjustable amounts, anywhere from five to 75 percent, rather than to sterilize the whole population completely. In this way, fertility could be adjusted from time to time to meet a society's changing needs, and there would be no need to provide an antidote. Contraceptives would still be needed for couples who were highly motivated to have small families. Subfertile and functionally sterile couples who strongly desired children would be medically assisted, as they are now, or encouraged to adopt. Again, there is no sign of such an agent on the horizon. And the risk of serious, unforeseen side effects would, in our opinion, militate against the use of any such agent, even though this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children.  Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great).  Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries.

Page 786-7 full-length extended quote: 

Involuntary fertility control  The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birthrates are rapidly reversed by other means. Some involuntary measures could be less repressive or discriminatory, in fact, than some of the socioeconomic measure suggested.  ...  A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. This of course would be feasible only in countries where the majority of births are medically assisted. Unfortunately, such a program therefore is not practical for most less developed countries (although in China, mothers of three children are commonly "expected" to undergo sterilization).  The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. No capsule that would last that long (30 years or more) has yet been developed, but it is technically within the realm of possibility.

Page 838 full-length extended quote: 

It is accepted that the law has as its proper function the protection of each person and each group of people. A legal restriction on the right to have more than a given number of children could easily be based on the needs of the first children. Studies have indicated that the larger the family, the less healthy the children are likely to be and the less likely they are to realize their potential levels of achievement. Certainly there is no question that children of a small family can be cared for better and can be educated better than children of a large family, income and other things being equal. The law could properly say to a mother that, in order to protect the children she already has, she could have no more. (Presumably, regulations on the sizes of adopted families would have to be the same.)  A legal restriction on the right to have children could also be based on the right not to be disadvantaged by excessive numbers of children produced by others. Differing rates of reproduction among groups can give rise to serious social problems. For example, differential rates of reproduction between ethnic, racial, religious, or economic groups might result in increased competition for resources and political power and thereby undermine social order. If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.

Study this whole extended passage carefully for an extremely unsettling view into the legal brain of John Holdren. Some of the sentiments he expresses here are beyond the pale, and his legal reasoning boggles the mind. 

Page 838 full-length extended quote: 

Individual rights. Individual rights must be balanced against the power of the government to control human reproduction. Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right. Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce. Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the "right responsibly to choose" the number and spacing of children (our emphasis). In the United States, individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and it has been held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether or not to have children, at least to the extent that a woman has a right to choose not to have children. But the right is not unlimited. Where the society has a "compelling, subordinating interest" in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could he required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted.  It is often argued that the right to have children is so personal that the government should not regulate it. In an ideal society, no doubt the state should leave family size and composition solely to the desires of the parents. In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?

This extended passage is a perfect example of how the "full context" of a short quote only makes it worse; once you see Holdren's complete elaboration on the idea, you realize it's not some flippant notion he tossed off, but something he feels deeply about. 

Page 942-3 full-length extended quote: 

Toward a Planetary Regime  ...  Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.  The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea an other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions.  The Planetary Regime might have the advantage over earlier proposed world government schemes in not being primarily political in its emphasis—even though politics would inevitably be a part of all discussions, implicitly or explicitly. Since most of the areas the Regime would control are not now being regulated or controlled by nations or anyone else, establishment of the Regime would involve far less surrendering of national power. Nevertheless it might function powerfully to suppress international conflict simply because the interrelated global resource-environment structure would not permit such an outdated luxury.

Page 917 full-length extended quote: 

If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible.

Full Context: High-res scans of all pages cited in this report 

Click on each of the images below to see the full-size scans of the pages mentioned in this report: 

Front cover

Back cover

Title page

Page 749

Page 786

Page 787

Page 788

Page 789

Page 837

Page 838

Page 839

Page 917

Page 942

Page 943

Page 944

Page 1001

Page 1002

Page 1003

 

Photographs of Ecoscience, inside and out 

Any finally, for the final proof that this is a real book co-authored by John Holdren --

and that these are real quotes from that book -- and not some elaborate hoax, here are some photographs (as opposed to scans) of the book itself: 

 

 

 

If you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog. 

 

The Murderous Mossad and 9-11

http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/terror/192915-the-murderous-mossad-and-9-11 

The Israeli Mossad murder of a commander of the military wing of the Hamas (the democratically elected government of Palestine) is just one more provocation by the right-wing Zionist extremist government headed by Benjamin Netanyahu.  The Israeli provocations on the West Bank and occupied Jerusalem are designed to foment a conflict in which the Israelis will escalate the violence. 

This is an extremely dangerous and illegal strategy which the United States and world should use every effort to arrest and prevent. 

Newspapers from the region are in agreement that Israel is acting to escalate the conflict and foment a war in the region:

Israel's plan to swallow Palestine has reached a peak... its project is to wipe Palestine from the map... an escalation rather than a settlement is looming in the region. 

– Al-Vefagh editorial (Iran)

The fresh Israeli aggression against the sanctity of the al-Aqsa mosque, and the attacks on worshippers by the Israeli security apparatus, represent the latest in a series of Israeli escalations over the past few weeks... they show that [Israel] is determined to escalate and even expand the conflict. 

– Al-Quds editorial (Palestine)

The US silence shows that ongoing attempts to resume negotiations have stalled and that those might have to wait until after a new Palestinian intifadah or even war. 

– Talal Akwal in Al-Ayyam (Palestine)

MOSSAD MADNESS

The Mossad has been at it again: The recent assassination of a Hamas military leader in Dubai looks conclusively like the Israelis' handiwork. No doubt, they hoped for a little more anonymity in the aftermath--they likely didn't expect the Dubai authorities to be quite so technologically competent...Either we are complicit or we are not--there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations.

- Melik Kaylan, "Mossad Madness", Forbes, February 26, 2010

Dubai's Police Chief Lt. Gen. Dhahi Khalfan Tamim identifies eleven of the 27 known suspects wanted in connection with the killing of a Hamas commander, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in a Dubai hotel room.

Tamim has called on Mossad Chief Meir Dagan to own up to his crime or deny Mossad's involvement in the murder.

The Dubai police have provided details about the stolen identities of the Mossad murderers and their arrival and departure routes.  Some of the killers came from and returned to Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy, and the United States. 

Will the United States, Switzerland, Germany, and the other nations involved investigate and pursue the Israeli killers that use their nations as bases? 

As Melik Kaylan says, "there's no ethical halfway zone in the matter of targeted assassinations."


A list of 26 Israeli Mossad agents wanted for the murder in Dubai - At least two of the suspects sought by Dubai police for the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh reportedly entered the U.S. shortly after the crime. 

One of the Israeli suspects entered the U.S. on February 14, carrying a British passport, while the other, with an Irish passport, entered the U.S. on January 21. Mabhouh's body was found in a Dubai hotel room on January 20. 

Will the Department of Homeland Security track down the Israeli killers in the United States?

There are lessons to be learned from the murder of a Hamas leader in Dubai.  The information provided about the murder of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh by the authorities of Dubai has shown the world that their police force is technologically competent and professional. 

The detailed information provided by the police of Dubai about the suspects involved in the al-Mabouh murder is the result of a police investigation using normal procedures, yet it is far superior to any of the information provided by the FBI about the 19 alleged terrorist hijackers of 9-11, who have been blamed for killing some 3,000 Americans. 

 Are the police of Dubai that much more competent and professional than the FBI or is there another reason why U.S. law enforcement seems so incompetent when dealing with Israeli crimes?

The murder of al-Mabouh is, like the false-flag terror atrocity of 9-11, evidently a crime committed by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad.  In both cases there is clear evidence of Israeli involvement.  In the Dubai murder case the authorities have come forward with detailed information and begun an international effort to identify and locate the suspects.

 In the "non-investigation" of 9-11, on the other hand, headed by Israeli citizen Michael Chertoff of the U.S. Department of Justice, crucial evidence was confiscated and destroyed while key terrorism suspects like Dominic Suter and Kobi Alexander were allowed to flee to Israel and were not pursued.

Michael Chertoff, son of an Israeli Mossad agent, oversaw the non-investigation of 9-11 in which prime suspects were allowed to flee to Israel and crucial evidence was confiscated and destoyed.

The response by law enforcement authorities in the two cases could hardly be more different.  Unlike the police of Dubai, when pursuing Israeli criminals the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI are dogs that won't bark - or hunt.  Why is that?

ISRAEL IN AMERICA

To understand why American Jews are willing to commit and cover-up serious crimes, even treason, on behalf of the state of Israel one needs to understand that most religious Jews in America are first obliged to serve Israel - a foreign state.  American Jews are, for this reason, conflicted.  Their religion obliges them to make "aliya" and live in Israel but most would prefer to stay in the United States. 

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis have chosen to leave "the Jewish state" and now live in the United States. 

While they are unwilling to leave the comfort of the United States and immigrate to Israel (aliya), most religious Jews in the United States feel strongly compelled to support and defend the state of Israel.

To fulfill their obligation to the state of Israel, Zionist Jews in America have created hundreds of organizations to raise funds and support for the Zionist state in Palestine.  These organizations are consolidated under an umbrella organization called the Jewish Agency. 

The Jewish Agency and the World Zionist Organization are two parts of the same Zionist enterprise that operates in the United States and around the world. 

The Jewish Agency was the Zionist organization that became the state of Israel in 1948 when a Jewish state was established in Palestine. 

The Jewish Agency, then headed by David Ben Gurion, literally became the apparatus of the Zionist state and Ben Gurion became the first prime minister of Israel.

The Jewish Agency, headquartered in New York City after World War II, organized and funded the Haganah, the Zionist militia in Palestine, as well as the terrorist groups known as the Irgun and LEHI (the Stern Gang).  Using these groups, the Jewish Agency created the Mossad LeAliyah Bet (the Agency for Illegal Immigration) in 1938 to smuggle illegal Jewish immigrants and weapons into Palestine.  The Jewish Agency and the Mossad worked together to bring many thousands of Jews to Palestine - illegally - from Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, and Europe. 

The Jewish Agency was the Mossad.

The Jewish Agency and the Mossad continued to work together after the creation of the state of Israel to bring Jews to the Zionist state.  The hard-line Zionists who run Israel today are actually fighting a losing battle with demographics.  The Arab population around them is growing quickly while many Israelis are leaving the Jewish state. 

The Israeli population has become more Russian, more extremist, and less Western in its outlook than at any time since the founding of the state in 1948.  Ariel Sharon, the now comatose prime minister who ran Israel in 2001, dreamed of bringing one million Jews to Israel from the United States.  In this effort he worked closely with the Jewish Agency.

The current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, is a dangerous extremist who said 9-11 was "very good" for U.S.-Israeli relations on the very day of the attacks.  Netanyahu has openly advocated mass expulsions of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories.  During a 1989 lecture at Bar Ilan University, he said: "Israel should have exploited the repression of the demonstrations in China, when world attention focused on that country, to carry out mass expulsions of the Arabs of the territories."  Later, he stated, "I still believe that there are opportunities to expel many people."

FEINBERG AND THE JEWISH AGENCY

Kenneth Feinberg was the Special Master of the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund. 

He alone was responsible for distributing some $7 billion of taxpayer money to the families of the victims of 9-11.  In this he was supported by some 30 lawyers from his law firm and his wife, Diane "Dede" Shaff Feinberg.  Diane is also an executive member of the United Israel Appeal and the Jewish Federation of Washington.  She also happens to be a member of the Board of Governors of the Jewish Agency - the parent organization of the Mossad.

Diane Shaff Feinberg, Governor of the Jewish Agency

The non-investigation of 9-11 was controlled by Michael Chertoff, the son of an Israeli Mossad agent and an orthodox rabbi.  Chertoff oversaw the destruction of the thousands of tons of steel from the World Trade Center - crucial evidence that was shipped to Asian smelters and melted down.  While Chertoff destroyed the evidence of 9-11, government appointed doctors prescribed Prozac for the grieving relatives and Kenneth Feinberg began his war of attrition on the 9-11 families.

As the sole person responsible for distributing the money from the Victims Compensation Fund, Feinberg paid out nearly $7 billion to families in compensation - if they would sign the agreement not to sue the airlines or the Israeli airport security firm involved in 9-11 (Huntleigh USA/ICTS). 

More than 98 percent of the families accepted the money from the Feinberg-managed fund.  The amounts of the payments and the amounts paid to Diane Feinberg and the 30 lawyers are not known. 

The American people deserve to know how the funds were used and who got paid.

Diane and Kenneth Feinberg were co-chairmen of the recent General Assembly of the Jewish Federation, which hosted Israeli leaders involved in terrorism.

Feinberg's actions were crucial to removing more than 98 percent of the families from the litigation process.  Kenneth Feinberg and Alvin Hellerstein have waged a war of attrition against the 9-11 relatives. 

Of the thousands of families that could have used the courts to find justice and legal discovery for what happened on 9-11, Feinberg was successful in removing 98 percent.  Of the 96 families that chose to go to court, all but one or two cases have settled out of court after enduring years of obstruction in the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein. 

Thanks to Feinberg and Hellerstein there may never be a trial for a single victim of 9-11.

Alvin K. Hellerstein has obstructed justice for the 9-11 families who chose to use the courts rather

than take the fund - or the Prozac.

Kenneth Feinberg is known for wearing expensive Brioni suits, smoking Cuban cigars, and driving his black Jaguar to his home in Bethesda, Maryland, where he has avoided paying taxes thanks to a few legal loopholes he knows about. 

Kenneth Feinberg was the co-chair (along with his wife) of a recent Zionist event in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak, two prime suspects in the Israeli terrorism of 9-11, participated.  Feinberg's role in covering up the truth about 9-11 is connected to his relationship to the state of Israel.  Kenneth Feinberg wasn't working pro bono on the 9-11 victims fund out of compassion for the victims of 9-11, or for America.  He was doing it to serve Israel and the murderous Mossad.

Sources and Recommended Reading:

“Middle Eastern anger at Israeli escalations”, BBC News, March 1, 2010
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543120.stm

 

“Benjamin Netanyahu”, Institute for Middle East Understanding, September 29, 2008
http://imeu.net/news/article0014362.shtml

Cummins, Chip, "Two Dubai Suspects Traveled to U.S." Wall Street Journal, March 1, 2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704089904575093881279902928.html?mod=rss_Today's_Most_Popular#articleTabs%3Darticle

Feinberg, Diane and Kenneth, The Leadership of the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, Washington D.C., November 8-10, 2009
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/press_photos.html
http://www.jewishfederations.org/local_includes/ujcfiles/ga09/program/

Ford, Henry, "The Jewish Question in Current Testimony" (The International Jew), Dearborn Independent, August 27, 1921
http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/Ford/original/ij75.html

Gibbon, Edward, "The Conduct of the Roman Government towards the Christians from the Reign of Nero to that of Constantine", The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Strahan & Cadell, London, 1776 

Kaylan, Melik, "Mossad Madness", Forbes.com, February 26, 2010
http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/25/mossad-israel-dubai-attack-opinions-columnists-melik-kaylan.html

Nahmias, Roee, "Dubai police to Mossad chief: Confess to Mabhouh murder or issue denial", Ynet News.com, February 27, 2010
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3855160,00.html

KARLMENN! FORÐIST PSA BLÖÐRUHÁLSKIRTILS KRABBAMEINS SKIMUN

 

Men: Avoid Prostate-Cancer PSA Screening

 

by John McDougall, MD
byJon McDougall, MD
Recently by John McDougall, MD: 

The Starch Solution

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/mcdougall2.1.1.html

 SJÚKDÓMSVÆÐING...

“...er sala sjúkdóma,  það sem að breikkar landamæri sjúkdóma og stækkar markaðinn fyrir þá sem selja og dreifa  meðferðar úrræðum.

Það eru skýr dæmi um að flestar sjúkdóms – vakningar  herferðir sem styrktar eru beint af lyfjaiðnaðinum- eru meira ætlaðar til þessselja lyf, en ekki að upplýsa og fræða, sem miðar að því að koma í veg fyrirsjúkdóma eða viðhalda heilbrigði.

Sjúkdómsvæðing gerir heilbrigt fólk að sjúklingum,  sóar dýrmætum auðlindum, og „læknining“  orsakar  skaða. ”

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191 

Ray Moynihan
Science writer for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Medical Journal

LarryKing Live,

 http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/aug/king.htm

 

 Á föstudeginum 21 Ágúst 2009,  þá  breytti sjónvarpsþátturinn  þúsundum annars heilbrigðra  karlmanna í sjúklinga, og olli þeim óbætanlegum skaða, þegar gestir  sjónvarpsþáttarins John McEnroe, Michael  Milken, og Christopher Rose mæltu með því að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu aðfara í PSA rannsókn, í þeim tilgangi að finna blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.

( Þennan þátt er líka hægt að finna frían á iTunes sem podcast og sem transcript.)  https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lkl/date/2009-08-21/segment/01

Ég (John McDougall, MD ) þekki Larry King persónulega.

Ég var gestur á hans alþjóðlega útvarpsþætti 3 sinnum í fjarlægri fortíð. Hann er heiðarlegur maður, en ég tel að hann hafi verið gerður að ginningarfífli fyrir blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins bisnessinn, á kostnað heilsu  karlmanna á þessu tiltekna kvöldi.

Þátturinn snart við tilfinningalegum þræði áhorfenda, með lifandi og  hljóðrituðum vitnisburði  frá  frægum mönnum,  sem höfðu sögu af  blöðruhálskirtils krabbameini sem hafði verið uppgötvað með PSA prófun.

Fyrrverandi ráðherra, hershöfðinginn Colin Powell, framkvæmdarstjóri LosAngeles  Dodger Joe Torre,  útvarpsþáttar stjórnandinn  Don Imus, leikarinn Charlton Heston, leikarinn Jerry Lewis, golfleikarinn Arnold Palmer, borgarstjóri New York Rudy Giuliani, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn John Kerry, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn  Bob Dole, og hershöfðinginn Norman Schwarzkoff, sögðu allir sögu sína af  viðureign sinni við blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein og  augljósan ávinning sem þeir töldu að þeir  hefðu fengið vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir  fylgdi.

Fræg sjónvarpsstjarna Merv Griffin kom einnig fram í video klippu, en sem dæmi „ heimska sjúklingsins“ sem  hunsaði ráðleggingar læknisins og galt fyrir með lífi sínu. ( Af þessum langa lista gætir þú ályktað sem svo að  allir eldri menn hefðu blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.)

Áhorfendum var sagt það að með nútíma tækni þá séu hinir kvíðvænlegu fylgikvillar vegna lausheldni og getuleysis núna sjaldgæfir.

Gestirnir mættu engri mótstöðu vegna þeirra samræmdu skilaboða um að allir  karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu að vera rannsakaðir – og það var engum símtölum  svarað á þessari klukkustund sem þátturinn var á.

Það verður að viðurkennast, að gestgjafinn Larry  King gerði tilraun til að vekja máls á ágreiningnum sem er í kringum  notkun tiltekinna   blöðruhálskirtils  mótefnavaka (PSA)  og stafrænnar endaþarms skoðunar (DRE), og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir kemur -  en hans  ögrandi athugasemdir  voru alltaf hunsaðar af gestum hans.

Hugsanlega var Larry King meðvitaður um það að margar af skoðununum sem  komu fram á meðan á þessum klukkutíma langa þætti væru rangar, og andstætt  ráðleggingum fyrir PSA prófun, sem gerð  er af  American  College of Preventive Medicine,  British  Columbia Office of Technology Assessment,  Canadian Cancer Society,  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, og  öðrum sjálfstæðum iðnaðar- samtökum.

 

Who’s Recommending PSA Testing?

HVERJIR MÆLA MEÐ PSA PRÓFUN?
 

Organizations Against (or Not Supporting) PSA Testing: 

SAMTÖK GEGN ( EÐA STYÐJA EKKI) PSA PRÓFUN.

American College of Preventive Medicine
American College of Physicians 
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 
National Cancer Institute (U.S.) 
British Columbia Office of Technology Assessment
United Kingdom National Health Services 
Canadian Cancer Society 
Canadian Urological Association
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care 
World Health Organization 
European Union Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention 
European Association of Urology 
Cancer Council of Australia
Swedish Council for Technology Assessment in Health Care
National Health Committee, New Zealand
 

Organizations Supporting PSA Testing:

SAMTÖK SEM STYÐJA PSA PRÓFUN.

American Urological Association 
The American College of Radiology
American Medical Association
The American Cancer Society
Urological Society of Australasia

This list is incomplete; however, note that special interest groups representing the prostate cancer industries support PSA testing.

 

 

FYLGIР PENINGASLÓÐINNI.

Það er kanski engin tilviljun að helsti stuðningur fyrir snemm búinni greiningu blöðruhálskirtils karabbameins  með PSA prófun, kemur frá læknisfræðilegum verslunarsamtökum.

Besta dæmið er American Urological Association,

http://www.auanet.org/content/homepage/homepage.cfm

sem kemur fram fyrir hönd meira 16,500 meðlima  sérstakra hagsmunar samtaka  (aðallega  fólks innan þvagfærafræðinnar/urology  ogoncology)  og styrkt af ( lyfja) iðnaðarfyrirtækjum, eins og Glaxo Smith Kline,  Eli Lilly,  Novartis,  Pfizer, og mörgum öðrum  fyrirtækjum sem fá innkomu frá karlmönnum með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.

Allir þrír gestirnir í þessum Larry King Live þætti, reyndust hafa fjárhagsleg tengsl við blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins  iðnaðarins.

John McEnroe er opinber talsmaður fyrir lyfjafyrirtæki, Michael Milken  vinnur með læknis lyfjaiðnaðinum í gegnum Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinsstofnunina  (Prostate Cancer Foundation), og  Dr.Christopher Rose er oncologist geislafræðingur  og starfar sem forstjóri lækna hjá Krabbameins miðstöðinni fyrir  geislameðferðir í Beverly Hills. (The Center for  Radiation Therapy of Beverly Hills.)

Óneitanlega mun vítæk PSA prófun þýða meiri gróða fyrir lækna, sjúkrahús,  rannsóknarstofur, og tækjabúnaðar – og lyfjaframleiðslu fyrirtækin.

Að vissum tíma liðnum þá virðist sem þessi tiltekni Larry King Live  þáttur 21. Ágúst 2009, geti hafa verið  kynningarhluti ætlað til að selja lyfið Avodart fyrir lyfjarisann Glaxo SmithKline (GSK).

Þann 16 Mars 2009 var það tilkynnt  (announced)

http://www.morethanmedicine.us.gsk.com/blog/2009/03/prostate-health-is-a-serious-issue.html

 að  MacEnro hefði gengið til liðs við GSK til þess að biðja karlmenn um að fara til læknis í  þeim tilgangi að vita hvert þeirra PSA stig væri.

Þann 27 April 2009 voru niðurstöður  (results)

http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10047.htm  úr prófunum hjá  REductionby DUtasteride of prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) tilkynntar á fundi hjá  Samtökum Amerískra Þvagfærafræðinga, (American Urological  Association) í Chicago, Illinois.

Í þessarri rannsókn sýndi dutasteride, sem er  hamlari fyrir blöðrukirtils-örvandi androgen5- alpha-dihhydrotestosterone, að fækka fjölda manna með blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinum 5% sem fannst með vefjasýnistöku. GSK selur dutasteride sem Avodart.

Með þessar niðurstöður frá REDUCE ferlinum, þá kemur áskorunin við að  markaðsetja vöruna, sem sé að finna viðskiftavini / kúnna;

í þessu tilfelli, karlmenn með ívið hækkað PSA stig.

Þetta var akkurat það sem Larry King Live þátturinn afrekaði!

John McEnroe vann sitt verk vel.

Með um það bil 1,300.000 áhorfndur daglega, þá bætti þessi þáttur tvímælalaust  við þá 218,900 karlmenn sem greindir eru árlega með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein í Bandaríkjunum.

Uppgötvun á hækkuðu PSA gæti gagnast karlmönnum, að undan skyldum þeim sem  fara í núverandi meðferðir eins og skurðaraðgerðir, geislameðferð, og lyfjameðferð ( sviptingu androgens) hafa ekki sýnt sig í að bjarga lífum ( um

það bil 27,050 karlmenn létust árið 2007 af þessum sjúkdóm).

HVERSVEGNA  PSA  PRÓFUN  OG  MEÐDFERÐIN SEM  FYLGIR  Á EFTIR   MISTEKST.

Á yfirborðinu lítur það þannig út að vegna  snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar  krabbameins í blöðruhálskirtlinum, muni uppgötvunin  lengja lífdaga karlmannanna.

Hvað sem því líður, þá sýna rannsóknar  niðurstöður  annað.

Fyrsta skýrslan frá Blöðruhálskirtils, Lungna, og Eggjastokka (PLCO)  Krabbameins skimunar ferill,  á áhrif  skimunar með sérstakt blöðruhálskirtils antigen (PSA) prófun og stafræna  endaþarms rannsókn (DRE) á dánartíðni af völdum blöðruhálskirtils  krabbameins  var birt í New England Journal of Medicine, March 26, 2009 – PSA  og DRE bjargaði engum lífum.

Önnur  þáttaskila skýrsla, birt í þessu sama hefti, var frá Evrópu og hún sýndi afdráttarlaust fækkun um minna en 1% en 1 dauðsfall hverjum 1000 karlmönnum sem tóku PSA prófið.

Það eru tvær ástæður fyrir því að PSA prófun mistekst að bjarga lífi: Fyrst, óhemju fá  biopsy-prófana sannaði að  krabbamein séu ógnun við líf þitt, og í öðru lagi sé  snemmbúin uppgötvun goðsögn.

Um allan heim eru blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins tilfellin sem uppgötvast í  smásjárskoðun á blöðruhálskirtlinum hjá 30% af karlmönnum eldri en  50ára.

 Í USA er hlutfall smjásjár  blöðruhálskirtils  krabbameins  jafnvel hærri í öllum aldurshópum:

8% manna á þrítugsaldri , 30% hjá mönnum á fertugsaldri, 50% hjá mönnum á sextugsaldri og  80% hjá mönnum á áttræðisaldri.

Hvað sem því líður, hjá flestum karlmanna þá munu þessar frumur sem líta út sem krabbamein  bersýnilega  aldrei dreifast, og  þessvegna  aldrei ógna  lífi  karlmnnanna.

Það var augljóst að  Larry King vissi  þetta, þegar hann  spurði gesti sína  tvisvar þessarrar spurningu.

„ Er  það   goðsögn að þú deyir með honum , en ekki af honum?“

Svarið er þetta:  „ mikið fleiri karlmenn  deyja með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein en af völdum þess.“

Jafnvel þó að blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein komi fyrir hjá flestum  karlmönnum, þá er verulega lítil hætta á að hann drepi sjúklinginn; dánartíðnin  er 226 per 100,000 hjá körlum yfir 65 ára aldur.  

Það hættulausa  en  mjög algenga krabbamein er vísað til sem  dulins krabbameins.  Krabbameinið sem  drepur,  er vísað til sem þróaðs krabbameins.

 Því miður, þá geta læknar ekki sagt  til um það, með því að skoða blöðruhálskirtilsvef í smásjá hvort að  krabbameinið muni einhverntíma verða ógnun við líf viðkomandi.

Niðurstaðan, nærri allir karlmenn  sem önnur þessarra tveggja tegunda krabbameins finnst hjá,  munu fá einhverja af þessum hörkulegu  meðferðum: skurðaraðgerð, geislun, geldingu, og/eða kemíska lyfjameðferð.

Sorglega staðreyndin er sú,  að þeir karlmenn sem hafa árásargjarna, þróaða  formið af þessum sjúkdóm,  munu heldur ekki hljóta ávinning af þessari meðferð, vegna þess að í þessum tilfellum er  uppgötvunin með PSA og DRE  alltof sein,  til þess að þær meðferðir sem eru í dag muni koma að gagni.

Eftir 10 ára vöxt, þegar þessi 2 próf  verða jákvæð, þá er meðaltal krabbameins massans inni í blöðruhálskirtlinum  orðið um 1 cm í þvermál, eða sem samsvarar stærð strokleðurs á enda blýants, og  samanstendur af um það bil billjón frumna. ⁵

Eins og þú getur séð,   „snemmbúin uppgötvun“   er goðsögn og rangnefni – þriðjungur  vaxtarins af þessu þróaða formi af þessum sjúkdóm, hafði þegar átt sér stað án vitundar  sjúklingsins og hans læknis.

Í þessum fátíðu tilfellum, þegar þetta er  raunverulega, „ banvænt form blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins.“  eftir 10 ára vöxt, þá hefur það þegar dreift sér um líkama mannsins.

Þegar þú  ákveður að fara í PSA próf þá ertu að spila á þann möguleika að prófið muni  mögulega finna krabbamein, sem muni geta verið meðhöndlað með góðum árangri og  bætt lífsgæði þín og lengt þitt líf..

Hugsaðu smástund..

Þú ert að veðja á mjög lítinn möguleika af raunverulega fræðilegum ávinningi  sem geti mögulega  átt sér stað í fjarlægri framtíð.

Ef að PSA prófið er jákvætt (það eru 10%líkur á því) og að vefjasýnataka muni leiða í ljós krabbamein  (það eru meira en 30% líkur á því)  þá er  harmleikurinn sem á eftir kemur tafarlaus, raunverulegur, lífs breytandi, og  fyrir alla menn sem greinast (100%) 

Bara það að greinast  með krabbamein breytir manneskjunni það sem eftir er æfinnar.

Endurnýjun heilsu - og líftryggingar eru ekki lengur fáanlegar.

Finna starf við hæfi er mjög  ótrúlegt.

Einu sinni greindur ( með krabbamein) ertu stimplaður „krabbameins sjúklingur“  það sem  þú átt eftir ólifað..

Daglegar áminningar koma frá fjölskyldu, vinum, í  lækna heimsóknum, og sögur í fjölmiðlum um krabbamein..

Áhyggjur og kvíði  stjórna lífi sjúklingsins og fjölskyldu hans.

Framtíð hans verður að  spurningarmerki..  

Allir verkir í líkamanum eru túlkaðir sem endurkoma  krabbameinsins .

Krabbameins  fórnarlambið einangrast frá restinni af heiminnum.¹⁵

Þá eru það  aukaverkanirnar frá meðferðunum.

Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins rannsóknir skýra frá að þvagleki  (lausheldni) var algengari hjá  radical prostatectomy (35%) heldur en með geisla meðferð(12%) eða sviftingu androgen(11%)

Ris vandamál komu iðulega í kjölfar allra meðferðanna (radical prostatectomy, 58%; radiation therapy, 43%;androgen deprivation, 86%).¹⁶  

Lausheldni þýddi  blautar buxur,  bleijur, og stundum þvaglegg ( catheter) í  blöðru mannsins það sem eftir var æfinnar. Niðurstaða Blöðruhálskirtils  Krabbameins rannsóknarinnar er íhaldssöm.

Það er líklegt að meira en  80 % af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins sjúklingunum þrói með sér ris vandamál,  erectile dysfunction 

https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/treating/radiation-therapy.html

hvort sem þeir hafa  farið í skurðaraðgerð, eða yfirborðs geisla meðferð.

Og þetta eru einungis 2 af  mörgum aukaverkununum sem koma frá bestu lyfjunum sem hægt er að bjóða karlmanni  með jákvæða PSA prófun.

ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ 

 

HEIMILDIR:

1)Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, MinasianLM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr.?? Prevalenceof prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May27;350(22):2239-46.

2)Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. Anexamination of the evidence. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov23;333(21):1401-5.

3)McNaughton C. Early detection of prostate cancer. Serendipity strikes again. JAMA. 1997Nov 12;278(18):1516-9.

4)Brawn PN.  Prostate-specific antigen levels from completely sectioned,clinically benign, whole prostates.Cancer. 1991 Oct 1;68(7):1592-9.

5)Friberg S, Mattson S. On the growth rates of human malignant tumors:implications for medical decision making. JSurg Oncol. 1997 Aug;65(4):284-97.

6) NealDE, Donovan JL. Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen? LancetOncol. 2000 Sep;1(1):17-24.

7)Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematicreview: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localizedprostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008Mar 18;148(6):435-48

8)Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN,Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O&#39;Brien B, Clapp JD,Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF,Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Mortality results from arandomized prostate-cancer screening trial. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9.

9)Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, KwiatkowskiM, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Määttänen L,Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, MossSM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancermortality in a randomized European study. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8.

10)Franks LM.  Proceedings: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology ofprostatic cancer. Cancer. 1973 Nov;32(5):1092-5.

11) Holund B.  Latent prostatic cancer in a consecutive autopsy series.  ScandJ Urol Nephrol.1980;14(1):29-35.

12) Sakr WA . The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of theprostate in young male patients.  JUrol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):379-85.

13)Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J.  Theprostate specific antigen (PSA) era in the United States is over for prostatecancer:  What happened in the last 20 years.  J Urol. 2004Oct;172(4, Part 1 Of 2):1297-1301.

14)Selley S .  Diagnosis, management and screening of early localisedprostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(2):i,1-96.

15)Little M. Chronic illness and the experience of surviving cancer. InternMed J. 2004 Apr;34(4):201-2.

16)Hoffman RM, Hunt WC, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL. Patientsatisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostatecarcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.Cancer. 2003;97:1653-62.

17)Wilson LS, Tesoro R, Elkin EP, Sadetsky N, Broering JM, Latini DM, DuChane J, ModyRR, Carroll PR. Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancertreatments.  Cancer.2007 Feb 1;109(3):518-27

 

33 samsæriskenningar sem reyndust vera sannar..33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True

 33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True

What Every Person Should Know...

 

Core Of Corruption - In The Shadows

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_98.htm#Core%20Of%20Corruption%20-%20In%20The%20Shadows

 

Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy.

 

However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.

 

To conspire means,

"to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end."

The term "conspiracy theory" is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from "the people".

To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature. Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions. Certainly we can all agree on this.

 

So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore? Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding. Or am I?

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo102.htm

https://whitewraithe.wordpress.com/33-conspiracy-theories-that-turned-out-to-be-true-what-every-person-should-know/

By Jonathan Elinoff, New World Order Report

http://www.newworldorderreport.com

After reading the article released by Cracked.com, I decided to update and revise their sloppy work.  Their article had only 7.  I can name 33 and I am planning on releasing a revised list soon with up to 50.  The article I was insulted to read by the lack of information can be viewed here, but don&#39;t waste your time, all of that is in this article and more.

 Most people can&#39;t resist getting the details on the latest conspiracy theories, no matter how far-fetched they may seem. At the same time, many people quickly denounce any conspiracy theory as untrue ... and sometimes as unpatriotic or just plain ridiculous.   Lets not forget all of the thousands of conspiracies out of Wall Street like Bernie Madoff and many others to commit fraud and extortion, among many crimes of conspiracy.  

USA Today reports that over 75% of personal ads in the paper and on craigslist are married couples posing as single for a one night affair.  When someone knocks on your door to sell you a set of knives or phone cards, anything for that matter, do they have a profit motive?  What is conspiracy other than just a scary way of saying “alternative agenda”?  When 2 friends go to a bar and begin to plan their wingman approach on 2 girls they see at the bar, how often are they planning on lying to those girls?  “I own a small business and am in town for a short while.  Oh yeah, you look beautiful.”

Conspiracy theory is a term that originally was a neutral descriptor for any claim of civil, criminal or political conspiracy. However, it has come almost exclusively to refer to any fringe theory which explains a historical or current event as the result of a secret plot by conspirators of almost superhuman power and cunning.  

To conspire means "to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or to use such means to accomplish a lawful end."  The term "conspiracy theory" is frequently used by scholars and in popular culture to identify secret military, banking, or political actions aimed at stealing power, money, or freedom, from "the people".

To many, conspiracy theories are just human nature.  Not all people in this world are honest, hard working and forthcoming about their intentions.  Certainly we can all agree on this.  So how did the term “conspiracy theory” get grouped in with fiction, fantasy and folklore?  Maybe that’s a conspiracy, just kidding.  Or am I? 

 Skeptics are important in achieving an objective view of reality, however, skeptism is not the same as reinforcing the official storyline.  In fact, a conspiracy theory can be argued as an alternative to the official or “mainstream” story of events. 

Therefore, when skeptics attempt to ridicule a conspiracy theory by using the official story as a means of proving the conspiracy wrong, in effect, they are just reinforcing the original “mainstream” view of history, and actually not being skeptical. 

This is not skeptism, it is just a convenient way for the establishment view of things to be seen as the correct version, all the time, every time.  In fact, it is common for "hit pieces" or "debunking articles" to pick extremely fringe and not very populated conspiracy theories.  This in turn makes all conspiracies on a subject matter look crazy.  Skeptics magazine and Popular Mechanics, among many others, did this with 9/11. 

They referred to less than 10% of the many different conspiracy theories about 9/11 and picked the less popular ones, in fact, they picked the fringe, highly improbable points that only a few people make.  This was used as the "final investigation" for looking into the conspiracy theories.  Convenient, huh?

 In fact, if one were to look into conspiracy theories, they will largely find that thinking about a conspiracy is associated with lunacy and paranoia.  Some websites suggest it as an illness.  It is also not surprising to see so many people on the internet writing about conspiracy theories in a condescending tone, usually with the words "kool-aid," "crack pot," or "nut job" in their articulation.  This must be obvious to anyone that emotionally writing about such serious matter insults the reader more than the conspiracy theorist because there is no need to resort to this kind of behavior.  It is employed often with an "expert" who will say something along the lines of, "for these conspiracies to be true, you would need hundreds if not thousands of people to be involved.  It&#39;s just not conceivable."  

I find it extremely odd that the assumption is on thousands of participants in a conspiracy.  I, for one, find it hard to believe any conspiracy involving more than a handful of people but the fact remains that there hae been conspiracies in our world, proven and not made up, that involved many hundreds of people.  It&#39;s not a matter of opinion, it&#39;s a matter of fact.

One more thing to consider, have you noticed that if the conspiracy is involving powerful interests with the ability to bribe, threaten or manipulate major institutions (like the mafia, big corporations or government) then don&#39;t you find it odd when people use one of those as the "credible" counter-argument? 

What I mean is, if you are discussing a conspiracy about the mafia, and someone hands you a debunking article that was written by the mafia, it doesn&#39;t seem like it would take rocket science to look at that with serious criticism and credibility.  This is the case with many conspiracies.  In fact, I am handed debunking pieces all the time written in many cases by the conspirators in question. 

Doesn&#39;t this seem odd to anybody else but me? 

While intelligent cynicism certainly can be healthy, though, some of the greatest discoveries of all time were initially received (often with great vitriol) as blasphemous conspiracy theories -- think of the revelation that the earth was not the center of the universe, or that the world was not flat but actually round.

What follows are some of these most shocking modern conspiracy theories that turned out true after thorough investigation by our society.  Some through congressional hearings, others through investigative journalism.  Many of these, however, were just admitted to by those involved. 

These are just 33 of them, and I still had a long list of others to add. 

There are a total of 33 in this article.  Many of these are listed with original and credible news clips on the matter, as well as documentaries.

1.      The Dreyfus Affair: In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).

2.      The Mafia: This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society&#39;s secrets to law enforcement officials.  What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world. 

3.      MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a "truth serum" to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.

A short video about MK-ULTRA from a documentary called Secrets of the CIA: 

 

 4.      Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to &#39;70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated "Animal Farm," by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.

5.      Manhattan Project:  The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer.  The project&#39;s roots lay in scientists&#39; fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret.  With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history.  Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that.  The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years.  Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.

6.      Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.

7.      Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn&#39;t until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.

8.      The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.

9.      Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up aU.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

 

 

 

10.  1990 Testimony of Nayirah:  A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony.  It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait. Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA.  The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl&#39;s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, "The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind... I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman&#39;s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations." Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations "by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador&#39;s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify." 

11.  Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s:  COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI&#39;s stated motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order."  According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women&#39;s rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those "seeking independence for Puerto Rico." The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert "white hate groups," including the Ku Klux Klan and National States&#39; Rights Party.  The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders. 

This is a documentary on COINTELPRO:

COINTELPRO: FBI&#39;s War On Black America **(HIGH QUALITY)**

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3729458480013375211&hl=en# 

  <embed id=VideoPlayback src=http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=3729458480013375211&hl=en&fs=true style=width:400px;height:326px allowFullScreen=true allowScriptAccess=always type=application/x-shockwave-flash> </embed>

12.  The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and &#39;86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.

13.  The BCCI Scandal:  The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets.  In the late 1980&#39;s BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed.  BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a "$20-billion-plus heist".  Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been "set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection." 

This is a report from July 23, 1991 on the BCCI:

 This is a report from July 8, 1991 on Connections between BCCI and the CIA: 

 This is a report from August 6, 1991 on how the BCCI funded Pakistan&#39;s

Nuclear Programs: 

 

  This is a report from March 4, 1991 on the BCCI:

14.  CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others.  In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury Newspublished Webb&#39;s "Dark Alliance", a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel.   "Dark Alliance" received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became "the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade."

April 6, 1987 Report on CIA Drug Running: 

 January 20, 1987 Report on CIA Drug Smuggling 

 

November 19, 1993 Report on CIA Drug Running: 

 

15.  Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened:  The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats.  This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War.  After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese.  The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by "communist aggression".  In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…”  In truth, Hanoi&#39;s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2.  In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: "For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there."  In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick&#39;s ship&#39;s log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the "apparent ambush"—was in fact unfounded.  In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2.  In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator&#39;s report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one.  In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors

November 9th, 1995 New Clip on Gulf of Tonkin:

 16.  The Business Plot:  In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we&#39;re talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one.  Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932.  Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934. Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages.  Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America&#39;s entry into World War II.  In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler&#39;s allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten. 

On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This "Bonus Army" was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time. A few days after Butler&#39;s arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur.  Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year&#39;s election.  In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. "Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism." Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.

BBC - Whitehouse Coup (Part 1) 

The Whitehouse Coup (1933) 2 of 3

 

 The Whitehouse Coup (1933) 3 of 3 

 

17.  July 20, 1944 Conspiracy to Assassinate Hitler:  Among another 20 some odd attempts, this one was one of the largest conspiracies involving hundreds of loyalists in the highest echelons of Hitler’s inner circle.  Near the end of WWII, things were rapidly going south for Germany and the time seemed ripe for guilt-ridden Nazi officers to assassinate Hitler and overthrow his government. Colonel Henning von Tresckow recruited Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg to join the conspiracy in 1944.  The plot to take out Hitler and then all of his loyal officers was called Operation Valkyrie.  The plan was to use the Continuity of Government Proceedings during an assassination on Hitler’s life to take over full control of the government in Germany.  The assassination would be blamed on the Nazi SS and therefore allow Stauffenberg to take full control of all aspects of the government.  It almost worked.  In July 1944, Stauffenberg was promoted so that he could now start attending military strategy meetings with Hitler himself. On more than one occasion Stauffenberg planned to kill Hitler at such a meeting with a briefcase bomb, but he always held off because he also wanted to take out Hitler&#39;s two right-hand men, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. On July 20, he went for it anyway and exploded a bomb inside Hitler&#39;s conference room with a remote detonator. Hitler survived only minor injuries. 

18.  Operation Ajax: For years, Britain had a spiffy trade deal with Iran regarding their prodigious oil fields. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was basically a giant money machine for the Anglo half, while the Iranian half got shafted. That all changed in 1951 when Iran nationalized the AIOC and the Iranian parliament elected Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister. Mossadegh was relatively secular, something that pissed of Iranian clerics, but he was also very nationalistic.  He was a democratically elected, pro American figure but the West saw his nationalizing of the oil fields a communist move(something Mossadegh thought was the right of the people to profit and pay for services in the country with).  Those oil fields were under the control of British Petroleum, but unfortunately Mossadegh overruled this long standing business control.  TheUnited States sent Kermit Roosevelt, FDR’s nephew and CIA coordinator in to figure out the mess.  The best he could come up with was to confront Mossadegh and have him overthrown and this was accomplished by bringing in what the agency refers to as “jackals.”  The United States backed the return of the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal dictators the country had ever seen and intentionally overthrew years before with the democratic leader, Mossadegh.  Until 1979, that is, when a pissed off Iranian populace finally revolted and replaced the monarchy with an anti-West Islamic Republic.  The result was a violently anti-American revolution lead by the Ayatollah Khomeini which overthrew the Shah and took hostage US Embassy workers, many of whom were involved in the plot with Kermit Roosevelt that installed the Shah.  The planning for the Coup took place largely in that embassy, but Americans were told this was due to the rise of radical Islam and rise of democracy hating Muslims, which of course was far from the truth. 

Part 1 of a video done on Operation Ajax history:

 

Part 2 of the video: 

 19.  Operation Snow White:  Some time during the 1970s, the Church of Scientology decided that they&#39;d had enough.  Apparently, the Church of Scientology managed to perform the largest infiltration of the United States government in history. Ever.  5,000 of Scientology&#39;s crack commandos wiretapped and burglarized various agencies. They stole hundreds of documents, mainly from the IRS. No critic was spared, and in the end, 136 organizations, agencies and foreign embassies were infiltrated. 

20.  Operation Gladio:  Gladio is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO "stay-behind" operation in Italy after World War II, intended to continue anti-communist resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organizations, "Operation Gladio" is used as an informal name for all stay-behind organizations, sometimes called "Super NATO".  The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation.Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter.  What can we prove about that role?  Thousands of documents, depositions and testimony as well as recorded conversations and admission by the highest levels of government in Italy.  That’s about as credible as it gets, regardless of the CIA’s adamant denial it ever happened.   What took place?  The shooting of innocent civilians, terrorism and assassinations all blamed on leftist communists were actually apart of well coordinated, “black operations.”  Black operations are typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol. 

“The right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.”  Black ops missions often fit into the deniable category, a situation in which there is no claim of responsibility for the action, and/or a false flag operation is used to give the appearance that another actor was responsible, or – most often – black operations involve extensive arrangements so as to be able to hide the fact that the black operation ever occurred. Black military operations, or paramilitary operations, can be used by various secret services to achieve or attempt to achieve an unusually sensitive goal. The methods used in black operations are also used in unconventional warfare. Depending on the precise situation in a given case, and the level of authoritarianism of the national government or other responsible party, some tasks will be conducted as black operations, while there are usually other activities that can be admitted openly. Black operations may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one&#39;s own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, etc.  Since 9/11, many black operations and long time unethical standings have been approved for legality in the war on terror.  In other words, since September 11^th, 2001, it is no a longer conspiracy for any of this to occur, a simple decision by a top level military or CIA official is enough, without oversight or even one thread of admission by the Government or Private conspirators.  Much of the Black operations today are performed by private contract companies like Blackwater (now Xe).

This is a documentary banned in teh United States that was allowed to air on BBC. 

It was an investigation into Operation Gladio:

 Timewatch:

Operation Gladio - Behind False Flag Terrorism & 9/11 (part3) 48:45 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3409375633223151728&hl=en# 

21.  The CIA Assassinates A Lot Of People (Church Committee): The Church Committee is the common term referring to the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the CIA and FBI after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair.  The Committee uncovered, among many other things, that the CIA had violated its charter to perform only gathering of intelligence.  For example, the assassinations of Allende in Chile and Mossadegh in Iran. Assassinations against Central and South American leaders and revolutionaries, as well as Africa, Middle East and East Asia.  The list was tremendous.  They even declassified a “Heart Attack Gun” the Agency had made for the use of killing someone without it being detected.  Cancer, car accidents, skiing accidents, suicide, boating accidents, heart attacks, and just plain being shot were common assassination methods.  The hearings, although recorded in full in congressional record, the mainstream media and official policies, is still largely not taught in American schools on recent history.  The American public still has no idea this was ever actually confirmed or even took place.  It is common for people to still refer to any of these assassinations as a joke or made up conspiracy.

Watch the one-minute video below for the description of a former CIA secretary and Congressional testimony on this secret assassination weapon which caused heart attacks.  

To watch the revealing 45-minute documentary from which the above clip was taken,

http://personalgrowthcourses.net/video/secrets_cia

 22.  The New World Order:  This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will. The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group.  Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage.  They receive no media coverage.  The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what? 

Discussions at the meetings include the economy, world affairs, war and in general, world policy. After the financial collapse, the Bilderberg played a key role in proposing that the world prepare for a new world order and have a standard world currency.  This was propsed shortly after by almost all attendees of the Bilderberg meeting.  During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II. They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic or liberal proposals for global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and N.A.T.O., and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism.  In the aftermath of the two World Wars, progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice.  American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman.  

In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein, 

on page 405, he wrote:

     "For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as &#39;internationalists&#39; and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that&#39;s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement bent on creating a "real" new world order. A number of Fabian socialist intellectuals, such as British writer H. G. Wells in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a full-fledged social democratic world government.  In the 1960s, a great deal of right-wing conspiracist attention, by groups like the John Birch Society and the Liberty Lobby, focused on the United Nations as the vehicle for creating the "One World Government", and contributed to a conservative movement for United States withdrawal from the U.N.. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, "international bankers" would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.  American televangelist Pat Robertson with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.

  After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods", which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that "conspiracy theorists were right".  In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists, such as American radio host Alex Jones, who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.

May 24, 1992 Report on New World Order:

 

 

23.  Kennedy Assassination - the 2nd Investigation by Congress Few People Know About, United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA): The HSCA was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated by a conspiracy involving the mob, and potentially the CIA.  The House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a "probable conspiracy," though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby&#39;s mafia connections and potential CIA and/or FBI connections to Oswald.  To this day, many conspiracy deniers are unaware that the Congressional investigation into JFK’s assassination concluded beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was a conspiracy.  What made them come to this conclusion?  Aside from reading the report, many witnesses (some of whom were CIA agents and station chiefs in Dallas that morning) were killed the night before testifying. For example, George de Mohrenschildt was a petroleum geologist who befriended Lee Harvey Oswald during the months preceding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy.  He also worked for the CIA.  He also blew his brains out the night before he was to testify to the committee.  The committee also uncovered, among many things, that Oswald left the marines where he learned how to speak fluent Russian (at the height of the cold war).  He was given money by the State Department to travel to Russia where he stopped off in Japan at a top secret US Military facility.  The Warren Commission even mentioned this part.  What most people do not know is that he probably was working in the Cold War infiltrating the Russians as either a “dangle,” “double agent,” or “defector" of some kind.  What is interesting is that upon his return he got more money from the State Department to buy a house and work with an ex FBI Chief and CIA officials in training anti-Castro Cubans for an invasion.  In Louisiana, where he was working, the CIA was involved in Operation Mongoose, Where Oswald worked under CIA Agent David Ferrie, who killed himself before testifying in a trial on the Assassination as well. Operation Mongoose worked closely with Southern Mafia figures largely because , the casinos in Cuba, which were shut down after Fidel obtained control over the country, were epicenters for control on the island.  The CIA even hired the mafia to assassinate Fidel on many occasions, 3 attempts which failed are common knowledge.  What is funny is that figures who worked very close with Oswald either ended up dead (over 100 of them connected to the assassination died within a few years of unusual circumstances) or they ended up in other conspiracies. 

February 201986 report on Mena Drug Smuggling: 

 

For instance, E Howard Hunt (CIA Agent) confessed to being involved in the conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy on his deathbed.  E Howard Hunt was one of the Watergate Burglars. Barry Seal, who worked with Oswald and Ferrie ended up being one of the largest cocaine smugglers in the United States during Iran Contra, as a key player for the agency and informant for the DEA.  There is so much more to get into, but there just isn’t enough time.  Oswald&#39;s tax returns are still classified top secret to this day.  Why?  Perhaps he was still getting $$ from the United States, which places him on the payroll.  That money trail leads to figures, many of whom were murdered, that would have blown the story wide open.  For 14 years, most didn&#39;t know this.  The HSCA investigaitons by congress went against the findings of the Warren Commission and both reports are from the same source, Congressional Committees.  Which is true?  Why do we only teach one to our children in school?

December 30, 1978 Report on HSCA Findings: 

 24.  1919 World Series Conspiracy:  The 1919 World Series (often referred to as the Black Sox Scandal) resulted in the most famous scandal in baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the Black Sox) were accused of throwing the series against the Cincinnati Reds.  Details of the scandal remain controversial, and the extent to which each player was involved varied. It was, however, front-page news across the country when the story was uncovered late in the 1920 season, and despite being acquitted of criminal charges (throwing baseball games was technically not a crime), the eight players were banned from organized baseball (i.e. the leagues subject to the National Agreement) for life.  There are hundreds of other conspiracies involving throwing games, sporting matches and large scale entertainment events.  It is common knowledge for many, this list would have to go into the thousands if we included all of them.

25.  Karen Silkwood:  Karen was an American labor union activist and chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plant near Crescent, Oklahoma, United States. Silkwood&#39;s job was making plutonium pellets for nuclear reactor fuel rods.  After being hired at Kerr-McGee, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union local and took part in a strike at the plant. After the strike ended, she was elected to the union&#39;s bargaining committee and assigned to investigate health and safety issues. She discovered what she believed to be numerous violations of health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment and improper storage of samples. She also believed the lack of sufficient shower facilities could increase the risk of employee contamination.  In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about these issues, alleging that safety standards had slipped because of a production speedup which resulted in employees being given tasks for which they were poorly trained. She also alleged that Kerr-McGee employees handled the fuel rods improperly and that the company falsified inspection records.  On November 5, 1974, Silkwood performed a routine self-check and found almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. She was decontaminated at the plant and sent home with a testing kit to collect urine and feces for further analysis. Oddly, though there was plutonium on the exterior surfaces (the ones she touched) of the gloves she had been using, the gloves did not have any holes.

This suggests the contamination did not come from inside the glove box, but from some other source, in other words, someone was trying to poison her.  The next morning, as she headed to a union negotiation meeting, she again tested positive for plutonium. This was surprising because she had only performed paperwork duties that morning. She was given a more intense decontamination. The following day, November 7, 1974, as she entered the plant, she was found to be dangerously contaminated — even expelling contaminated air from her lungs. A health physics team accompanied her back to her home and found plutonium traces on several surfaces — especially in the bathroom and the refrigerator. The house was later stripped and decontaminated. Silkwood, her partner and housemate were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory for in-depth testing to determine the extent of the contamination in their bodies.  Later that evening, Silkwood&#39;s body was found in her car, which had run off the road and struck a culvert. The car contained no documents. She was pronounced dead at the scene from a "classic, one-car sleeping-driver accident".

26.  CIA Drug Smuggling in Arkansas:  August 23, 1987, in a rural community just south of Little Rock, police officers murdered two teenage boys because they witnessed a police-protected drug drop.  The drop was part of a drug smuggling operation based at a small airport in Mena,Arkansas. The Mena operation was set up in the early 1980&#39;s by the notorious drug smuggler, Barry Seal. Facing prison after a drug conviction in Florida, Seal flew to Washington, D.C., where he put together a deal that allowed him to avoid prison by becoming an informant for the government. As a government informant against drug smugglers, Seal testified he worked for the CIA and the DEA. In one federal court case, he testified that his income from March 1984 to August 1985, was between $700,000 and $800,000. This period was AFTER making his deal with the government. Seal testified that nearly $600,000 of this came from smuggling drugs while working for -- and with the permission of the DEA. In addition to his duties as an informant, Seal was used by CIA operatives to help finance the Nicaraguan Contras. The CIA connection to the Mena operation was undeniable when a cargo plane given to Seal by the CIA was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of weapons. In spite of the evidence, every investigator who has tried to expose the crimes of Mena has been professionally destroyed, and those involved in drug smuggling operations have received continued protection from state and federal authorities.

  February 20, 1986 report on Mena Drug Smuggling:

 April 7, 1988 Report on CIA Drug Running: 

 

 Iran Contra CIA Drug Running Mena Arkansas Barry Seal 3 25 1994 CBS

 

 

 

 

 27.  Bohemian Grove:  For years, many conspiracy theorists were saying that the rich and powerful met every year in the woods and worshiped a giant stone owl in an occult fashion.  It turns out, ABC, CBS, NBC, and many other credible news agencies investigated this and found out, its true.  It is said to be just all fun and games, like brotherhood style fraternity stuff. 

 These news clips can be viewed by clicking here.

July 21, 1983 Report on Bohemian Grove Mentioned: 

 

For more clips on the Bohemian Grove including comprehensive investigations by the mainstream media, clik here...  

 http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Articles/tabid/266/ID/588/Rare-news-clips-about-Bohemian-Grove

surfaced-for-documentary-film-project.aspx 

 

28.  Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip was the code name for the 1945 Office of Strategic Services, Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency recruitment of German scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after VE Day.  President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he expressly ordered that anyone found "to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism" would be excluded.  These included Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold, who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a "menace to the security of the Allied Forces." All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds "bleached" by the military; false employment histories were provided, and their previous Nazi affiliations were expunged from the record. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name. 

29.  The Round Table:  British businessman Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an "Imperial Federation" to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, of 1877, written at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal:  “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labor and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.” 

In his later wills, a more mature Rhodes abandoned the idea and instead concentrated on what became the Rhodes Scholarship, which had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in 1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared world view among future British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at the University of Oxford.  Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end, Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and, with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to elicit their support. The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949 but it would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner and Curtis.  The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period.  

Originally envisioned as a British-American group of scholars and diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers and international lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S. secretary of state, Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on 29 July 1921. The first of the council’s projects was a quarterly journal launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs.  Some believe that the Council on Foreign Relations is a front organization for the Round Table as a tool of the "Anglo-American Establishment", which they believe has been plotting from 1900 on to rule the world. The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of the American Old Right (Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to substantiate this view, even though he argued that the Establishment is not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic elites in the United Kingdom and the United States. Quigley also argued that, although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today it is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.     

American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirswherein, on page 405, he wrote: “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as &#39;internationalists&#39; and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that&#39;s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”  Barkun argues that this statement is partly facetious (the claim of "conspiracy" or "treason") and partly serious – the desire to encourage trilateral cooperation among the U.S., Europe, and Japan, for example – an ideal that used to be a hallmark of the internationalist wing of the Republican Party when there was an internationalist wing.  However, the statement is taken at face value and widely cited by conspiracy theorists as proof that the Council on Foreign Relations (itself alleged to be a front for an "international banking cabal", as well as, it is claimed, the sponsor of many "globalist" think tanks such as the Trilateral Commission) uses its role as the brain trust of American presidents, senators and representatives to manipulate them into supporting a New World Order.   

Conspiracy theorists fear that the international bankers of financial capitalism are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”.  In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered:  “I don&#39;t think that I really feel that we need a world government. We need governments of the world that work together and collaborate. But, I can&#39;t imagine that there would be any likelihood or even that it would be desirable to have a single government elected by the people of the world ...

There have been people, ever since I&#39;ve had any kind of position in the world, who have accused me of being ruler of the world. I have to say that I think for the large part, I would have to decide to describe them as crackpots. It makes no sense whatsoever, and isn&#39;t true, and won&#39;t be true, and to raise it as a serious issue seems to me to be irresponsible.”  Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup, argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an "imperial brain trust", which has, for decades, played a central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the post-WWII international order and the Cold War, by determining what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table; while others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere policy discussion forum, which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy planning. The latter argue that it has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the group; all the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates and speakers; and as far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access to its historical archives. 

30.  The Illuminati:  The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded on May 1^st, 1776, in Ingolstadt (Upper Bavaria), by Adam Weishaupt, who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. The movement consisted of freethinkers, secularists, liberals, republicans and pro-feminists, recruited in the Masonic Lodges of Germany, who sought to promote perfectionism through mystery schools. As a result, in 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the monarchy and state religion.  In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati survived their suppression and became the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being enlightened absolutists who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a world revolution in order to globalize the most radical ideals of the Enlightenment: anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent.  Although many say that the Illuminati was disbanded and destroyed  so long ago, it is well known that the Rothschild dynasty following the family’s involvement in the secret order in Bavaria received much attention for its major takeover of Europe’s central banks.  The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s wealth and evidence suggests it has funded both sides of major wars, including the United States Civil War.   

31.  The Trilateral Commission:  The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations.  In July 1972, Rockefeller called his first meeting, which was held at Rockefeller&#39;s Pocantico compound in New York&#39;s Hudson Valley. It was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and industry.  Its first executive committee meeting was held in Tokyo in October 1973. The Trilateral Commission was officially initiated, holding biannual meetings.  A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975 meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade and Finance, said: "Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system." Another Commission document read:  "The overriding goal is to make the world safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides for each country against external and internal threats which will constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national government into the international exchange of both economic and non-economic goods."  

March 29, 1981 News Clip on Trilateral Commission:

 

May 2, 1995 News Clip on Trilateral Commission:

32.  Big Brother or the Shadow Government:  

It is also called the “Deep State” by Peter Dale Scott, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.   A shadow government is a "government-in-waiting" that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event.  It turned out this was true on 9/11, when it was told to us by our mainstream media.  For years, this was ridiculed as a silly, crazy conspiracy theory and, like the others listed here, turned out to be 100% true.  It is also called the Continuity of Government.  The Continuity of Government (COG) is the principle of establishing defined procedures that allow a government to continue its essential operations in case of nuclear war or other catastrophic event.  Since the end of the cold war, the policies and procedures for the COG have been altered according to realistic threats of that time.  These include but are not limited to a possible coup or overthrow by right wing terrorist groups, a terrorist attack in general, an assassination, and so on.  Believe it or not the COG has been in effect since 2001.  After 9/11, it went into action.  Now here is the kicker, many of the figures in Iran Contra, the Watergate Scandal, the alleged conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and many others listed here are indeed members of the COG.  This is its own conspiracy as well.   

March 1, 2002 News Clip on Secret Government:

   

The Secret Team: The CIA and Its Allies in Control of the United States

and the World 

is a book written by Air Force Col. L fletcher Prouty, published in 1973.  From 1955 to 1963 Prouty was the "Focal Point Officer" for contacts between the CIA and the Pentagon on matters relating to military support for "black operations" but he was not assigned to the CIA and was not bound by any oath of secrecy. (From the first page of the 1974 Printing) It was one of the first tell-all books about the inner workings of the CIA and was an important influence on the Oliver Stone movie JFK. But the main thrust of the book is how the CIA started as a think tank to analyze intelligence gathered from military sources but has grown to the monster it has become. The CIA had no authority to run their own agents or to carry out covert operations but they quickly did both and much more. This book tells about things they actually did and a lot about how the operate.  In Prouty&#39;s own words, from the 1997 edition of The Secret Team: This is the fundamental game of the Secret Team. They have this power because they control secrecy and secret intelligence and because they have the ability to take advantage of the most modern communications system in the world, of global transportation systems, of quantities of weapons of all kinds, and when needed, the full support of a world-wide U.S. military supporting base structure. They can use the finest intelligence system in the world, and most importantly, they have been able to operate under the canopy of an assumed, ever-present enemy called "Communism." It will be interesting to see what "enemy" develops in the years ahead. It appears that "UFO&#39;s and Aliens" are being primed to fulfill that role for the future. To top all of this, there is the fact that the CIA, itself, has assumed the right to generate and direct secret operations. "  He is not the first to allege that UFOs and Aliens are going to be used as a threat against the world to globalize the planet under One government. 

March 1, 2002 report on Secret Government:

  

The Report From Iron Mountain is a book, published in 

1967 

(during the Johnson Administration) by Dial Press, that states that it is the report of a government panel.  According to the report, a 15-member panel, called the Special Study Group, was set up in 1963 to examine what problems would occur if the U.S. entered a state of lasting peace. They met at an underground nuclear bunker called Iron Mountain (as well as other, worldwide locations) and worked over the next two years. Iron Mountain is where the government has stored the flight 93 evidence from 9/11.  A member of the panel, one "John Doe", a professor at a college in theMidwest, decided to release the report to the public.  The heavily footnoted report concluded that peace was not in the interest of a stable society, that even if lasting peace "could be achieved, it would almost certainly not be in the best interests of society to achieve it." War was a part of the economy. Therefore, it was necessary to conceive a state of war for a stable economy. The government, the group theorized, would not exist without war, and nation states existed in order to wage war. War also served a vital function of diverting collective aggression. They recommended that bodies be created to emulate the economic functions of war. They also recommended "blood games" and that the government create alternative foes that would scare the people with reports of alien life-forms and out of control pollution. Another proposal was the reinstitution of slavery.  U.S. News and World Report claimed in its November 20, 1967 issue to have confirmation of the reality of the report from an unnamed government official, who added that when President Johnson read the report, he &#39;hit the roof&#39; and ordered it to be suppressed for all time. Additionally, sources were said to have revealed that orders were sent to U.S.embassies, instructing them to emphasize that the book had no relation to U.S. Government policy.  Project Blue Beam is also a common conspiracy theory that alleges that a faked alien landing would be used as a means of scaring the public into whatever global system is suggested.  Some researchers suggest the Report from Iron Mountain might be fabricated, others swear it is real. 

Bill Moyers, the American journalist and public commentator, has served as White House Press Secretary in the United States President Lyndon B. Johnson Administration from 1965 to 1967. He worked as a news commentator on television for ten years. Moyers has had an extensive involvement with public television, producing documentaries and news journal programs. He has won numerous awards and honorary degrees. He has become well known as a trenchant critic of the U.S. media. Since 1990, Moyers has been President of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.  He is considered by many to be a very credible outlet for the truth.  He released a documetnary titled, The Secret Government, which exposed the inner workings of a secret government much more vast that most people would ever imagine. Though originally broadcast in 1987, it is even more relevant today. Interviews with respected top military, intelligence, and government insiders reveal both the history and secret objectives of powerful groups in the hidden shadows of our government.

Here is that documentary:

The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, by Bill Moyers

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3505348655137118430&hl=en#     

For another powerful, highly revealing documentary on the manipulations of the secret government produced by BBC, click here (view free at link provided).

The intrepid BBC team clearly shows how the War on Terror is largely a fabrication.

For those interested in very detailed information on the composition of the shadow or secret government from a less well-known source, take a look at the summary available here.

33.  The Federal Reserve Bank:  The fundamental promise of a central bank like the Federal Reserve is economic stability.  The theory is that manipulating the value of the currency allows financial booms to go higher, and crashes to be more mild.  If growth becomes speculative and unsustainable, the central bank can make the price of money go up and force some deleveraging of risky investments - again, promising to make the crashes more mild.  The period leading up to the American revolution was characterized by increasingly authoritarian legislation from England.  Acts passed in 1764 had a particularly harsh effect on the previously robust colonial economy.  The Sugar Act was in effect a tax cut on easily smuggled molasses, and a new tax on commodities that England more directly controlled trade over.  The navy would be used in increased capacity to enforce trade laws and collect duties.  Perhaps even more significant than the militarization and expansion of taxes was the Currency Act passed later in the year 1764. "The colonies suffered a constant shortage of currency with which to conduct trade. There were no gold or silver mines and currency could only be obtained through trade as regulated by Great Britain. Many of the colonies felt no alternative to printing their own paper money in the form of Bills of Credit."   The result was a true free market of currency - each bank competed, exchange rates fluctuated wildly, and merchants were hesitant to accept these notes as payment.  Of course, they didn&#39;t have 24-hour digital Forex markets, but I&#39;ll hold off opinions on the viability of unregulated currency for another time.  England&#39;s response was to seize control of the colonial money supply - forbidding banks, cities, and colony governments from printing their own.  This law, passed so soon after the Sugar Act, started to really bring revolutionary tension inside the colonies to a higher level.  American bankers had learned early on that debasing a currency through inflation is a helpful way to pay off perpetual trade deficits - but Britain proved that the buyer of the currency would only take the deal for so long...  

Following the (first) American Revolution, the "First Bank of the United States" was chartered to pay off collective war debts, and effectively distribute the cost of the revolution proportionately throughout all of the states.  Although the bank had vocal and harsh skeptics, it only controlled about 20% of the nation&#39;s money supply.    

Compared to today&#39;s central bank, it was nothing.  Thomas Jefferson argued vocally against the institution of the bank, mostly citing constitutional concerns and the limitations of government found in the 10th amendment.  There was one additional quote that hints at the deeper structural flaw of a central bank in a supposedly free capitalist economy.  "the existing banks will, without a doubt, enter into arrangements for lending their agency, and the more favorable, as there will be a competition among them for it; whereas the bill delivers us up bound to the national bank, who are free to refuse all arrangement, but on their own terms, and the public not free, on such refusal, to employ any other bank" –Thomas Jefferson.  Basically, the existing banks will fight over gaining favor with the central bank - rather than improving their performance relative to a free market. 

The profit margins associated with collusion would obviously outweigh the potential profits gained from legitimate business.  The Second Bank of the United States was passed five years after the first bank&#39;s charter expired.  An early enemy of central banking, President James Madison, was looking for a way to stabilize the currency in 1816.  This bank was also quite temporary - it would only stay in operation until 1833 when President Andrew Jackson would end federal deposits at the institution.    

 The charter expired in 1836 and the private corporation was bankrupt and liquidated by 1841. While the South had been the major opponent of central banking systems, the end of the Civil War allowed for (and also made necessary) the system of national banks that would dominate the next fifty years.  The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) says that this post-war period of a unified national currency and system of national banks "worked well." [3]  Taxes on state banks were imposed to encourage people to use the national banks - but liquidity problems persisted as the money supply did not match the economic cycles.  Overall, the American economy continued to grow faster than Europe, but the period did not bring economic stability by any stretch of the imagination.  Several panics and runs on the bank - and it became a fact of life under this system of competing nationalized banks.  In 1873, 1893, 1901, and 1907 significant panics caused a series of bank failures.    

The new system wasn&#39;t stable at all, in fact, many suspected it was wraught with fraud and manipulation.  The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis is not shy about attributing the causes of the Panic of 1907 to financial manipulation from the existing banking establishment.  "If Knickerbocker Trust would falter, then Congress and the public would lose faith in all trust companies and banks would stand to gain, the bankers reasoned."  In timing with natural economic cycles, major banks including J.P. Morgan and Chase launched an all-out assault on Heinze&#39;s Knickerbocker Trust.  Financial institutions on the inside started silently selling off assets in the competitor, and headlines about a few bad loans started making top spots in the newspapers.  The run on Knickerbocker turned into a general panic - and the Federal Government would come to the rescue of its privately owned "National Banks."  During the Panic of 1907, "Depositors &#39;run&#39; on the Knickerbocker Bank. J.P. Morgan and James Stillman of First National City Bank (Citibank) act as a "central bank," providing liquidity ... [to stop the bank run]  President Theodore Roosevelt provides Morgan with $25 million in government funds ... to control the panic. Morgan, acting as a one-man central bank, decides which firms will fail and which firms will survive."  How did JP Morgan get so powerful that the government would provide them with funding to increase their power?  They had key influence with positions inside the Administrations. 

 They had senators, congressmen, lobbyists, media moguls all working for them.  In 1886, a group of millionaires purchased Jekyll Island and converted it into a winter retreat and hunting ground, theUSA&#39;s most exclusive club. By 1900, the club&#39;s roster represented 1/6th of the world&#39;s wealth. Names like Astor, Vanderbilt, Morgan, Pulitzer and Gould filled the club&#39;s register. Non- members, regardless of stature, were not allowed. Dignitaries like Winston Churchill and President McKinley were refused admission.  In 1908, the year after a national money panic purportedly created by J. P. Morgan, Congress established, in 1908, a National Monetary Authority. In 1910 another, more secretive, group was formed consisting of the chiefs of major corporations and banks in this country. The group left secretly by rail from Hoboken, New Jersey, and traveled anonymously to the hunting lodge on Jekyll Island.  In fact, the Clubhouse/hotel on the island has two conference rooms named for the "Federal Reserve."  The meeting was so secret that none referred to the other by his last name. Why the need for secrecy?

   Frank Vanderlip wrote later in the Saturday Evening Post, "...it would have been fatal to Senator Aldrich&#39;s plan to have it known that he was calling on anybody from Wall Street to help him in preparing his bill...I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System."  At Jekyll Island, the true draftsman for the Federal Reserve was Paul Warburg. The plan was simple. The new central bank could not be called a central bank because America did not want one, so it had to be given a deceptive name. Ostensibly, the bank was to be controlled by Congress, but a majority of its members were to be selected by the private banks that would own its stock.  To keep the public from thinking that the Federal Reserve would be controlled from New York, a system of twelve regional banks was designed. Given the concentration of money and credit in New York, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York controlled the system, making the regional concept initially nothing but a ruse.    

The board and chairman were to be selected by the President, but in the words of Colonel Edward House, the board would serve such a term as to "put them out of the power of the President." The power over the creation of money was to be taken from the people and placed in the hands of private bankers who could expand or contract credit as they felt best suited their needs.  Why the opposition to a central bank?  Americans at the time knew of the destruction to the economy the European central banks had caused to their respective countries and to countries who became their debtors. They saw the large- scale government deficit spending and debt creation that occurred in Europe.  But European financial moguls didn&#39;t rest until the New World was within their orbit. In 1902, Paul Warburg, a friend and associate of the Rothschilds and an expert on European central banking, came to this country as a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and Company.   

He married the daughter of Solomon Loeb, one of the founders of the firm. The head of Kuhn, Loeb was Jacob Schiff, whose gift of $20 million in gold to the struggling Russian communists in 1917 no doubt saved their revolution.  The Fed controls the banking system in the USA, not the Congress nor the people indirectly (as the Constitution dictates). The U.S. central bank strategy is a product of European banking interests.  Government interventionists got their wish in 1913 with the Federal Reserve (and income tax amendment).  Just in time, too, because the nation needed a new source of unlimited cash to finance both sides of WW1 and eventually our own entry to the war.  After the war, with both sides owing us debt through the federal reserve backed banks, the center of finance moved from London to New York.  But did the Federal Reserve reign in the money trusts and interlocking directorates?  Not by a long shot.  If anything, the Federal Reserve granted new powers to the National Banks by permitting overseas branches and new types of banking services.  The greatest gift to the bankers, was a virtually unlimited supply of loans when they experience liquidity problems.    

From the early 1920s to 1929, the monetary supply expanded at a rapid pace and the nation experienced wild economic growth.  Curiously, however, the number of banks started to decline for the first time in American history.  Toward the end of the period, speculation and loose money had propelled asset and equity prices to unreal levels.  The stock market crashed, and as the banks struggled with liquidity problems, the Federal Reserve actually cut the money supply.  Without a doubt, this is the greatest financial panic and economic collapse in American history - and it never could have happened  on this scale without the Fed&#39;s intervention.  The number of banks crashed and a few of the old robber barons&#39; banks managed to swoop in and grab up thousands of competitors for pennies on the dollar.

 The following docmentary is called America: From Freedom to Fascism:

America: Freedom to Fascism - Director&#39;s Authorized Version

1:51:16 - 2 years ago

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&hl=en#    

 This next documentary is called, The Money Masters:

The Money Masters - How International Bankers Gained

Control of America  47:22 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-515319560256183936&hl=en# 

Monopoly Men (Federal Reserve Fraud) (1999)

 

 

 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7065177340464808778&hl=en#

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BÓLUEFNI GEGN LÖMUNARVEIKI KENNT UM FARALDUR Í NÍGERÍU

Polio Vaccine Blamed for Outbreaks in Nigeria

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/Polio-Vaccine-Blamed-for-Outbreaks-in-Nigeria.aspx

Posted by: Dr. Mercola
December 01 2009 |

 

 

Lömunarveiki er að dreifast í Nígeríu---og heilbrigðisyfirvöld segja að í  sumum tilfellum sé orsökin bóluefnið sem er notað í baráttunni við hinn lamandi  sjúkdóm. Alþjóðlega heilbrigðismála stofnunin (WHO) hefur sent út viðvörun um  að þessi tiltekni  virus gæti breiðst út fyrir Afríku.

Meira en  120 Nígerísk börn hafa lamast á þessu ári – tvisvar sinnum fleiri bæklaðir en árið  2008.

Nígería og  margar aðrar þjóðir nota lömunarveiki bóluefni sem gefið er í gegnum munn,  (oral)  vegna  þess að það er ódýrara,   einfaldara,  og ver allt samfélagið..

(Innskot Agný..Hvað er að verja,  ef að x aðgerð sem á að verja þig veldur því að þú smitar aðra og sjúkdómurinn dreyfist út og jafnvel stökkbreytist..?

Þetta er það rökhyggjulausasta lið sem til er! Eða "þeir" halda  að  okkur hinum almenna borgara verði ekki fótaskortur í vitglórunni,  sem ég vona nú reyndar að  við flest höfum smá af enn...þó svo við séum nú kanski að  fara að verða "mutaded beast " miðað við allt DNA frá dýrum sem er í bóluefnum...)

( AGNY-What are they protecting if x procedure who is made to protect you cause you to shed the diseace and the diseace even mutate? This people has no bone in their argument -so much is for sure! Or "they" think we the public have become so stupid  that we can not even make 2+2 become 4- still I hope we have not all become like a walking dead- though it is very likely we have self become mutated "beast" from all the animal DNA in the  vaccines  - after all -vaccines are brewed on both animal tissue and plant proteins...never wondered why all these allergie comes from? Peanut allergy- milk allergy- antibiotic allergy- this is all in the vaccine brew!)

En það er búið til  úr lifandi lömunarveiki virus, sem hefur þá hættu í för með sér að valda  lömunarveiki. 

Í einstaka tilfellum getur  virusinn í bóluefninu stökkbreyst í banvænni útgáfu sem eru kveikjan að nýjum  faröldrum.

Erfðafræðilegar greiningar hafa sannað það að þannig stökkbreyttur  virus hafi valdið að minnsta kosti sjö aðgreindum faröldrum í Nígeríu.

 Sources: MSNBC August 14, 2009

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases

Lömunarveiki bóluefni kennt um faraldra í Nígeríu.

Stökkbreyting af lifandi virus í munntöku (oral) skömmtum  tengt 124 tilfellum á þessu ári, segja sérfræðingar.

 

ATHUGASEMDIR DR.MERCOLA

Lömunarveiki, smitandi sjúkdómur sem orsakast af virus  í þörmunum, getur valdið lömun, öndunarerfiðleikum og dauðsföllum í sinni  verstu mynd.

Hvað sem því líður, þá er það SJALDNAST upplýst að í flestum  tilfellum er lömunarveiki vægur sjúkdómur, veldur flensu líkum einkennum og  hverfur á 2-10 dögum..

 

Oft á lömunarveiki sér stað og sýnir alls engin

einkenni.

Mayo Clinicstates: segir  jafnvel. „Meiri  hluti  fólks  sem smitast af lömunarveiki  virusnum verða ekki veikir, og verða þess aldrei áskynja að þeir hafi sýkst af  lömunarveiki.“

Annað sem gæti  valdið þér undrun, er að öll lömunarveiki (polio) tilfellin,  sem hafa orðið eftir að lömunarveiki bóluefnið  kom til sögunnar í þróunarlöndunum, voru af völdum bóluefnisins.   the vaccineitself

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx

Mayo Clinic heldur áfram:

Í Bandaríkjunum var síðasta  tilfellið af villtri lömunarveiki- lömunarveiki af náttúrulegum orsökum—árið  1979,  en ekki af völdum bóluefnisins sem inniheldur lifandi virus.“

Nígería  hefur líka þurft að takast á við lömunarveiki faraldra sem hafa orsakast af  sjálfu lömunarveiki bóluefninu!

Þjóðin hefur þurft að takast á við að minnsta kosti sjö einstök tilfelli  lömunarveiki faraldra sem orsökuðust vegna stökkbreysts  lömunarveiki viruss, frá  lömunarveiki bóluefninu  sjálfu, samkvæmt því sem sjúkdómsvarnareftirlit (CDC) Bandaríkjanna skýrir frá.

according to the U.S. Centers for DiseaseControl and Prevention..

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32418446/ns/health-infectious_diseases

HVERNIG VELDUR  LÖMUNARVEIKI  BÓLUEFNIРLÖMUNARVEIKI?

Nígería og margar aðrar fátækari þjóðir nota munntöku (oral) bóluefni sem  inniheldur lifandi lömunarveiki virus.

Lifandi virusinn getur ekki bara valdið  lömunarveiki hjá bólusettum einstaklingum, hann getur stökkbreyst í jafnvel enn hættulegra afbrigði og kveikt nýjafaraldra.

Til dæmis átti sér stað faraldur á Haiti og Dóminiska lýðveldinu (DominicanRepublic) árið 2002  sem rakinn var til  afbrigðis af munntöku lömunarveiki bóluefnis (OPV) sem stökkbreyttist í skætt  afbrigði. a strain of oralpolio vaccine (OPV) that mutated

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/polio-vaccine-blamed-for-outbreaks-in-nigeria.aspx

Öll tilfelli af lömunarveiki sem hafa átt sér stað  í  Bandaríkjunnum eftir  1979 hafa orsakst af bóluefninu sjálfu sem inniheldur lifandi virusa.

Samkvæmt skýrslum frá Neil Z. Miller hjá Alþjóðlegu bólusetningarstofnuninni, þá getur lifandi lömunarveiki virusinn frá bóluefninu, verið til staðar í hálsi þínum í 1-2 vikur og í hægðunum getur  hann verið allt að 2 mán..

 

Þannig..það er ekki einungis bóluefnis þeginn sem verður í hættu,  

heldur getur hann/hún  hugsanlega smitað sjúkdómnum svo lengi sem

virusinn er í hægðunum.

 

Árið 1999 fyrirskipaði Ráðgjafa  nefnd ónæmisaðgerða (ACIP) að Bandaríkin  skiftu út því sem eftir er til af lifandi –virus bóluefninu með ´´dauðu“ óvirku virus bóluefni.

Hvað sem því líður, þá hefur óvirka lömunarveiki virus bóluefnið heldur  ekki verið án  fjölda alvarlegra  aukaverkana.

Tengsl á milli lömunarveiki bóluefnisins og  krabbameins.

Á árunum 1950 -1960, var lömunarveiki bóluefnið sem enn er gefið i  Bandaríkjunum, venjulega 4 sinnum á 16 fyrstu mánuðum barnsins, mjög mengað af  SV40, apa virus, sem hafði komist í bóluefnið á meðan á framleiðslu ferlinu  stóð.  ( Frumur úr nýrum apa, þar sem  SV40 þreifst, var notað til að  þróa  lömunarveiki bóluefni.)

Í tilraunastofu prófunum uppgötvaðist það, að virusinn olli fjölda ólíkra  tegunda krabbameins, þar á meðal krabbameini í heila, og núna er SV40 að koma  fram hjá fjölda fólks, sem eru með  lungnakrabbamein,  heilakrabbamein,  beinkrabba   og sogæðaeitla  krabbamein.

Samkvæmt höfundum bókarinnar The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus,Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed  

http://www.sv40foundation.org/Book-VV.html

Virusinn og bóluefnið: 

Sönn saga af  Krabbameins-valdandi Apa Virus, Menguðu Lömunarveiki Bóluefni, og Miljónir  Berskjaldaðra Bandaríkjamann,  þá neituðu  leiðandi vísindamenn og yfirmenn stjórnvalda því að endurtaka rannsóknina sem  sýndi að SV40 væri í bóluefninu,  og  jafnvel enn í dag eru vel þekktar umboðsskrifstofur  sem vísa   rannsóknar  niðurstöðunum á bug.

 

Virusinn er jafnvel að koma fram hjá börnum sem voru of ung til að hafa fengið mengaða bóluefnið, og sumir sérfræðingar eru núna að gefa það í skyn að mengandi virusinn hafi verið í lömunarveiki bóluefninu allt  til síðla árs 1999.

as late as 1999

 Það vegna slíkrar áhættu sem að Barbara Loe Fisher, stofnandi NationalVaccine Information Center, sagði:

"Með vaxandi sönnunargögnum um  að kross-tegunda flutningur virusa geti átt sér  stað, þá ættu Bandaríkin að hætta að nota dýravefi við bóluefna framleiðslu.“

Þetta er einnig  sama ástæða fyrir  því að Donald Miller, hjartaskurðlæknir og  professor í skurðlækningum við Washington Háskóla, stingur upp á hér

User-Friendly Vaccination Schedule,  það..að ef þú velur að láta bólusetja  barnið þitt gegn lömunarveiki, að þú biðjir um óvirkt /dautt virus bóluefni, sem ræktað er í manns frumum, ekki í nýrnafrumum úr öpum.

Hvernig þú minnkar  áhættuna á lömunarveiki með því að forðast  sykur.

Lömunarveiki er ekki algeng í Bandaríkjunum, en er vandamál í mörgum   löndum.

Jæja...vissir þú að þú getur minnkað hættuna á að fá þennan sjúkdóm bara  með því að minnka sykurneyslu þína? 

Það er til fjöldinn allur af rannsóknum sem sýna fram á það,  við það að neyta unnins sykurs þá eykur þú hættunaá að fá lömunarveiki... refined sugar increases your risk of contracting polio.

 

Samkvæmt einni slíkri  rannsókn er efni sem myndast við hreinsunarferlið á sykrinum, svo sem eins og deoxsykur,  er talið að  það geti verið orsakavaldur að  lömunarveiki.....

Jafnvel  þó að lömunarveiki virusinn sé til staðar á meðal íbúanna, þá er samt ekki  líklegt að þú fáir hana nema þú neytir unnins  sykurs í mjög miklu óhófi.

Ein af stærstu  og áhrifaríkustu  rannsóknar dæmunum sem ég get deilt með ykkur sem styðja þessa óvæntu  niðurstöðu, kemur frá dýra tilraunum sem var gerð fyrir 50 árum síðan..

Rannsóknaraðilarnir  reyndu ítrekað að sýkja kanínur með lömunarveiki, en það bar ekki árangur fyrr en þeir  lækkuðu blóðsykurs magnið  hjá kanínunum  með því að sprauta þær með insulin,   lowered the rabbits&#39; blood sugarlevels with insulin injections,, sem trúlega bæklaði ónæmiskerfi kanínanna og olli því að þær sýktust af lömunarveiki..

Lömunarveiki og aðrir smitsjúkdómar, virðast aðeins valda aukaverkunum   þegar ónæmiskerfi okkar er veiklað, sem getur auðveldlega skeð vegna lélegrar  næringrar, stress og ónógs svefn.

Lömunarveiki bóluefnið er ekki aðal lausnin  til þess að koma í veg fyrir þennan sjúkdóm..

Á móti því að hlaða þig upp af bóluefnum, þá gæti  það að takmarka sykur notkun þína,  verið  áhrifaríkasta aðgerðin sem þú gerir til þess að bæta heilsu þína almennt, þar  sem það hjálpar til þess að halda ónæmiskerfi þínu sterku, sem mun skila sér í  því að minnka hættuna á því að þú fáir fjöldann allan af sjúkdómum, þar á meðal  lömunarveiki..

ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ. 

Læt hér slóðir inn á aðrar þýðingar mínar um samskonar málefni. 

More post´s about same object  on the links there.

ARGENTÍNSK STJÓRNVÖLD RANNSAKA DAUÐSFÖLL BÓLUSETTRA BARNA. 

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/637512 

LÖMUNARVEIKI Í NÍGERÍU RAKIN TIL STÖKKBREYTTS BÓLUEFNIS..

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/356536

LÆKNAR OG VÍSINDAMENN FORDÆMA BÓLUSETNINGAR.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/348959

Bólusetningar orsök og aukaverkanir.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/330190 

 

RelatedLinks:

  SV40, Polio Vaccine, and Cancer: NowBeyond Coincidence?

SV40,LÖMUNARVEIKI  BÓLUEFNI OG KRABBAMEIN, LANGT  ÚT FYRIR MÖRK TILVILJANA.

Simian Virus 40 DNA Found In US Children

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/simian-virus-40-dna-found-in-us-children.aspx

Fructose: This Addictive Commonly Used Food Feeds Cancer Cells, Triggers Weight Gain, and Promotes Premature Aging

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx

Polio Linked to Sugar Consumption

LÖMUNARVEIKI  TENGT VIÐ NEYSLU SYKURS.

Vaccine Confirmed as Source of PolioOutbreak

BÓLUEFNI  STAÐFEST SEM ORSAKAVALDUR LÖMUNARVEIKI FARALDS.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/12/01/polio-vaccine-blamed-for-outbreaks-in-nigeria.aspx

SJOKKERANDI VIÐVÖRUN : FÓSTURLÁT AF VÖLDUM H1N1 SVÍNAFLENSU BÓLUEFNISINS.

-Swine Flu Alert -- Shocking Vaccine Miscarriage Horror Stories

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/28/Shocking-Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Miscarriage-Stories.aspx

 

Heilbrigðis yfirvöld Bandaríkjanna  hafa sett ófrískar konur í hæsta áhættu hópinn til að fá H1N1 svínaflensubóluefnið, en er þetta í reynd öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur og þeirra börn?

Staðreyndin er sú,  að á  innihalds lýsingu  svínaflensu  bóluefnisins segir að það hafi ekki verið  rannsakað með tilliti til þess,  hvort það  sé öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur.

Og fósturláts skýrslur frá ófrískum konum sem  hafa verið bólusettar með H1N1 svínaflensu bóluefninu eru byrjaðar að streyma  inn frá öllum þjóðum..

( Innskot Agný. Þetta er fínt...þeir  eru sko að nota bóluefnið til þess að fækka mannkyninu..það er í raun það sem  allt þetta flensu faralds propaganda áróður snýst um...Sama hvaða nafni  faraldurinn nefnist...Svínaflensa 1976, West Nile virus, SARS,  fuglaflensa..en þeim gekk ekki nógu vel að  gera þetta að heimsfaraldri..en trikkið er að setja x veirur með í t.d árlega  flensubóluefnið..og volia þú verður undarlega veikur rétt eftir  bólusetninguna..sorry geta liðið upp í 2 vikur...nú..eða að þú hrekkur uppaf..ekk  isíst ef þú ert í þessum víðfræga „áhættu“hóp..sem þýðir að þú ert með  langvinnan sjúkdóm, undirliggjandi sjúkdóm,  sem setur þig í þann hóp að þér er  eiginlega skipað/mandatory að fara í sprautuna..

Ja reyndar falla heilbrigðisstarfstéttir líka þarna inn..herinn, lögreglan og slökkviliðsmenn...allavega í USA.. Líkaminn hefur bara miki meira  en nóg djobb við að berjast við sjúkdómana sem fyrir eru,   til að geta búið til  mótefni...þannig að viðkomandi fær sjúkdóminn sem bólusetningin á að vera   gegn..  Utan við öll önnur efni sem eru í bóluefninu...hvað með þá sem eru með  óþol fyrir eggjum?   Öll flensu bóluefni eru ræktuð í kjúklinga fósturvísi... þar  að auki er mesta kvikasilfur/THIMEROSAL  magnið í flensubóluefninu miðað við önnur  bóluefni...  

Thimerosal er líka í  öðrum bóluefnum..þar á meðal er það í TWINRIX  ADULT og TWINRIX PEDIATRIC bóluefninu sem er gegn lifrarbólgu A og B og er  notað hér á landi bæði fyrir fullorðna og börn..Þó svo Thimerosal sé ekki í  PRIORIX sem er MMR = mislingar, rauðir hundar oghettusótt bóluefnið sem notað er hér á  landi...og hefur verið af mörgum tengt við autism/einhverfu..

SET SLÓÐIR HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN ÞAR SEM ÞIÐ GETIÐ KYNNT YKKUR MÁLIÐ SJÁLF EF  ÁHUGI ER FYRIR HENDI.)

 

Slóðin hér fyrir neðan inniheldur  sögur sem munu gera þig reiða/n og sjokkeraðan. Ef þú ert ófrísk móðir, viltu  þá vera svo væn að fara EKKI  í H1N1 svínaflensu bólusetninguna!

Í staðinn, gerðu  allt sem þú mögulega getur til að forðast almennings stað,  og vertu viss um að  þú þvoir þér enn betur og oftar um hendurnar en þú ert vön.

Rannsakaðu og  kynntu þér allar þær náttúrulegu aðferðir sem eru til, til þess að bægja  flensunni frá..

Þýðandi Agný. 

Sources:

  Organic Health November 11,2009 

Is The H1N1 Vaccine Safe? Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had

Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine

 http://organichealthadviser.com/archives/shocking-h1n1-swine-flu-vaccine-miscarriage-stores-from-pregnant-women-tell-your-doctors-that-vaccines-and-pregnancy-do-not-mix

  About.com

 

Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog

From Krissi Danielsson, Former About.com Guide since 2007

Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine

 

http://miscarriage.about.com/b/2009/09/29/some-pregnant-women-fearful-of-h1n1-vaccine.htm

 

  LatestH1N1 Swine Flu Alerts 

 

The hype and hysteria over H1N1 Swine Flu has intensified worldwide without enough proper information about it. 

http://swineflu.mercola.com/ 

  Flu WasNot the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic 

Flu Was Not the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/02/28/Flu-Was-Not-the-Real-Killer-in-the-1918-Pandemic.aspx 

 

Flu may not have killed most in 1918 pandemic

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5146PD20090205?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews&sp=true 

  

  CanadaLooks at Vitamin D for Swine Flu Protection 

 http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/27/canada-looks-at-vitamin-d-for-swine-flu-protection.aspx

  ALERT:Special Swine Flu Update 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu-Update.aspx 

SwineFlu -- One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx 

  ObamaDeclares Swine Flu Emergency 

 

Algeng tenging við dauðsföll af völdum  svínaflensu.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/31/CDC-Says-Kids-That-Die-From-Swine-Flu-Have-Coexisting-Bacterial-Infections.aspx

Ný rannsókn sem  gerð  var hjá Sjúkdómsvarnar eftirlitinu(CDC)  uppgötvaði það að þau 36 börn sem  látist höfðu af völdum H1N1 frá April – Agust þá höfðu einstaklingarnir engin  krónísk heilsufars vandmál. En öll áttu þau við bakteríu sýkingar að stríða á  sama tíma.

Sú mest algenga sýking sem var til staðar sem olli  flensu tengdum dauðsföllum, var staphylococcus  aureus. Við berum  það  helst í nefi og/eða húðinni.. Flensan veldur efri loftvega skemmdum, og býr  til greiða leið fyrir staphs inn í  lungun..

Þýðandi Agný. 

Sources:

  Star Tribune October 5, 2009  

 Diseases - In -The - Vaccinated 1

http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated

http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/proof-that-european-h1n1-vaccines-contain-mercury-squalene-and-tween-80/

Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated 2
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated-Page-2

Vaccine Injury Photos  From The CDC
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccine-Injury-Photos-From-The-CDC

ER  ÞETTA SVÍNA FLENSU AFBRIGÐI SÝKLAVOPN? 

IS THIS VERSION OF SWINE FLU  A BIO-WEAPON?

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/7/ 

SWINE  FLU  HEFUR  MÖGULEGA  ORÐIР TIL  VEGNA  MANNLEGRA

 MISTAKA  VIÐ BÓLUEFNA FRAMLEIÐSLU.

SWINE FLU  GET A LIVE BECAUSE OF MISTAKES  IN VACCINE MAKING..

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/5/

HEFUR BAXTER LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE?

HAS BAXTER  INTERNATIONAL RELEASED BIO-WEAPON IN UKRAINE?

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/978492/

BÓLUSETTUR  MEÐ VALDI  OG LÖGBOÐIÐ  RFID FYLGT EFTIR  MEÐ  HERVALDI. VIDEOS

Forced vaccinations: a whistleblower&#39;s clear warning -  Project Camelot
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/952875/

ÖREINDAR  ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS ?

 Are Populations  Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/974102/

URGENT WARNING H5N1 DNAin Flu Vaccine.

VIDEO Fínt að hafa fuglaflensu veiruna með
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/827643/

Warning...Hybrid Bird Flu  About To Be Released?

FEMA líkkisturnar tilbúnar...FEMA COFFINS ARE READY!
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/4/

The bird/swine flu is man made.

FUGLA/ SVÍNA FLENSAN ER BÚIN TIL AF MÖNNUM!!

ER MEXIKANSKA  SVÍNAFLENSAN SÝKLAVOPN?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/869772/

Five die after  seasonal flu vaccination

http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2911318

    The New York Times mentions an 8-year-old boy from LongIsland who died roughly a week after receiving a seasonal flu vaccine

Flu Vaccine  Ruins Beautiful Redskins Cheerleader

http://www.nfljuice.com/2009/10/20/flu-vaccine-ruins-beautiful-redskins-cheerleader/

Last year, a 6-year-old girl from Colorado died after getting the FluMist vaccine

U.S. Government Ignores Flu Vaccine Death

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/07/17/u-s-government-ignores-flu-vaccine-death.aspx

A  Review of Four Approved Swine Flu Vaccines’ Ingredients

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/05/Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx

 

The National Vaccine InformationCenter (NVIC )  

http://www.nvic.org/  is calling for a comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated  individuals for all health outcomes, and I believe it would be prudent to do so.

 Flu Vaccine may Lead to Asthma in Infants 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/04/14/flu-vaccines-part-one.aspx

  Risks ofFluMist Vaccine 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/10/04/flumist-vaccine.aspx 

  Girl’s FluDeath Happened Within Hours 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/3/18/girl-s-flu-death-happened-within-hours.aspx 

 

HEFUR BAXTER LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE? -Has Baxter Released A BioWeapon In Ukraine?

 

Has Baxter Released A BioWeapon In Ukraine?

By David  Rothscum

11-2-9

http://www.rense.com/general88/bax.htm

Sannanir virðast benda til þess að Baxter International sé ábyrgt fyrir hinum nýja banvæna  faraldri af virus lungnabólgu í Ukarine.

 Í febrúar 2009 skýrði Bloomberg

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aTo3LbhcA75I 

frá því að Baxter hefði af „slysni“ sent bóluefni sem innihélt bæði lifandi Asíu fuglaflensu veiru og árlega innflúensu veiru til fjölmargra rannsóknarstofa út um allan heim. Tilraunarstofa ákvað að prófa bóluefnið á mörðum og létust allir merðirnir skyndilega.  

Það verður að taka það fram að Baxter hefur gert „ mistök“ eins og þessi áður. http://www.aegis.com/news/re/1996/RE960283.html

Blóð afurðir framleiddar af Baxter innihéldu einu sinni HIV.

Þúsundir dreyra sjúklinga lést vegna þessa, og margir smituðu maka sína. 

Síðla á þessu ári kom undarleg saga fram á netinu. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/14/man-suspected-of-making-t_n_259330.html  

Fréttirnar voru  fullar af skýrslum um mann að nafni Joseph Moshe, sem var handtekinn eftir margra klukkutíma umsátur lögreglunnar vegna þess að hann hefði átt að vera með hótanir gegn Hvíta húsinu.

Manninum tókst að standa af sér margar umferðir af táragasi...sem gerði yfirmenn  L.A lögreglunnar forviða.

 

Hvað sem því  líður, þá hafði netsamfélagið sínar efasemdir um meinta ástæðu fyrir handtöku mannsins.

Athugasemdir á Huffington Post vefsíðunni byrjuðu strax að streyma út í sambandi við duldrar hliðar á þessarri sögu, nefnilega að Joseph Moshe væri útsendari Mossad, sem væri sérhæfður í sýklahernaði sem hefði hringt inn í útvarpsþátt til þess að vara fólk við sýklavopni sem væri verið að framleiða af Baxter International, og  yrði dreift með  bóluefni og myndi valda plágu um leið og því væri útdeilt. 

Intentional Contamination of Vaccine With Avian Flu Marks Start Of Massive Biological War & Genocide By NWO & Homeland Security

http://www.libertyforlife.com/military-war/vaccine-bio-weapons.htm

Þó að allir geti komið með dómsdagsspár og við ættum aldrei að trúa neinum (og það verður að segjast að Sannleiks  hreyfingin tók vel á þessu, skilaboðunum var dreift án þess að það væri gert að guðspjalli).

Undarlegi þátturinn um fullyrðingar Moshe var staðsetningin sem Moshe sagði að verið væri að framleiða sýklavopnið á.

Af öllum  stöðum, þá fullyrti Moshe að rannsóknarstofa Baxter´s í Ukarine, væri að búa til þetta sýklavopn.

Allt þetta kom fram í byrjun Ágúst, sem er meira en 2 mán áður en núverandi ástand er að þróast.

Að Moshe skuli  hafa nafnið rétt á landinu þar sem hinn nýi faraldur yrði leystur úr læðingi, krefst annaðhvort innanbúðar upplýsinga, eða alveg einstaklega mikilla tilviljana, sem að allir með tölfræðilega grunnþekkingu geta sjálfir staðfest fyrir sig.

 Gerum ráð fyrir því, svona augnablik, að hver einasta manneskja á plánetunni hafi jafna möguleika á að skapa banvæna farsótt vegna viruss sem stökkbreytist um leið og hann dreifir sér um líkama viðkomandi.

http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2009/ds/kn/kn_e/kn0609_e.html

 Íbúar Ukarine eru 46 miljónir.

http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html

Áætlað er að núverandi fólksfjöldi í heiminum sé 6.7 biljónir.

Þetta þýðir ef að ný farsótt sé komin af stað, þá ættu möguleikarnir á að þessi farsótt sem er að byrja í Ukaine að vera 0.69%

http://zik.com.ua/en/news/2009/10/29/202374

Hvað sem því líður, þá virðist þetta vera einhverskonar flensu afbrigði.

Þetta  gerir  líkurnar á því að geta rétt upp áþví að banvænt flensu afbrigði muni brjótast út í Ukarine jafnvel enn minna..

Ástæðan fyrir því er sú að snemma í Ágúst þá var meirihluti innfluensu sýkinga að finna í ýmsum öðrum löndum heldur en Ukarine.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/292540,ukraine-confirms-first-swine-flu-death-quarantine-ordered.html

Staðreyndin er sú að 30. Oktober skýrði Earthtimes frá því að Ukarine hefði einungis skýrt opinberlega frá 2 tilfellum svínflensu, og engum dauðsföllum, þar til síðasta Föstudag.

Þessi banvæna farsótt virðist hafa sprottið upp úr engu í Ukarine.

Moshe´s  líffræði prófíll virðist staðfesta stöðu hans sem örveirufræðings. http://www.biomedexperts.com/Profile.bme/78637/Moshe_Bar-Joseph

Ennfremur, þessi síða með Baxter´s tengiliða upplýsingum í sambandi við Ukarine  skrifstofuna staðfestir að Baxter hafi viðurvist í Ukarine.

Það verður einnig að láta það koma fram ótrúlegan fjölda örveirulíffræðinga sem hafa látist á vofveiglegan hátt. ( Innskot AGNÝ. Þeir dauðu segja ekki frá og þó..... )

http://www.stevequayle.com/dead_scientists/UpdatedDeadScientists.html

 Það lítur út fyrir að þetta hafi verið hugrakkur maður sem fórnaði öllu til að koma  skilaboðum á framæri til okkar, geti skýrt hversvegna svona margir örveirulíffræðingar hafa verið myrtir.

( Innskot Agný. Sennilega til að þeir kæmu ekki upp um áætlanir stóra bróðurs og klansins á  bak við tjöldin..Fyrst er hagkerfi heimsins rústað..og okkar litla Íslandi fyrst..en við höngum nú á merinni enn..en þá er næsta ráðið að rústa heilsufari  fólks..jamm og Ísland verður þar fyrst í flokki as usual..leiðitömu jarmandi sauðirnir  sem við flest erum því miður..og flestir trúa því enn að kaninn sé vinur okkar..)

 Staðreyndin er sú að þessum manni tókst að segja fyrir um það hvar mjög banvæn innfluenza myndi brjótast út og þar sem við myndum síst hafa átt von,    2 mánuðum áður en það skeður, eykur trúverðugleika fullyrðinga hans um að Baxter International sé ábyrgt fyrir útbreiðslunni og sýni það að topp örveirulíffræðingar geti skapað því fólki vandamál sem ber ábyrgð á þessum hörmungum núna.

Þessi saga er í þróun, búist við að sjá mögulegar uppfærslur frá David Rothscum jafnóðum og meiri upplýsingar berast um  það hvað sé að gerast í Ukarine.

 Uppfærsla 1:

Til þess aðkoma í veg fyrir að upplýsingar hverfi, þá ætla ég að spegla allar upplýsingar sem ég get fundið hér..

Athugasemdir á vefsíðu Huffington post um blaðagrein um handtöku Moshe´s sem skýrir frá fullyrðingum hans um að Innfluenzu  virus í bóluefni sem búinn er til af Baxter í Ukarine, afriti RNA frá 1918 flensunni og sé ætlað sem sýklavopn:

http://www.infowars.com/images/josephmosheukraine.JPG

  Uppfærsla 2:

Stjórnvöld í  Ukarínu vilja koma á ferða hömlunum hjá fólki um landið til þess að koma í veg  fyrir að virusinn dreifist.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jlasqqSlUIt56rnsbgDSaDdjU9kw 

Uppfærsla 3:

Samkvæmt  athugasemdum á Huffington post sem ég vísaði í hér fyrr, þá fullyrti Dr. Moshe  að virusinn noti  RNA  afritun frá spænsku flensunni 1918.

http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/influenza%20phil%201918.htm

Einkenni 1918 flensunnar frá fórnarlömbum er sagt vera að drukkna í eigin blóð:

Bandaríkjamenn þekktu flensuna: hún kom þér í bælið, lét þér líða illa í 3-4 daga með hita, vöðvaverki, stíflur, og eftir það varst þú veikburða í viku. Hún sýkti miljón manns, en drap einungis þá elstu, yngstu og veikburða.

Bandaríkjamenn voru ekki kunnugir 1918 innflúensunni.

http://www.history.navy.mil/library/online/influenza%20phil%201918.htm 

Hún var hryllingur sem lét fórnarlömbin verða svarblá og drekkti þeim síðan í eigin líkams vökvum. Flestir sem létust voru á aldrinum 15-40, þeir sem áttu að vera á hátindi heilsufarslega.

Fórnarlömbin voru góð eina mínútu og þá næstu ófær, hitinn rauk upp og með óráði. Hitinn rauk upp í 104 -106 gráður (F), húðin varð blá, fjólublá, eða dökk brún vegna súrefnisskorts.

Alvarleg lungnabólga réðst á lungun, fyllti þau vökva, blóð spýttist úr nefinu. Dauðinn var snöggur, grimmur og ógnvekjandi.

Fimm manns hafa látist af völdum flensunnar í Lviv, fjórir karlmenn og ein kona, segir Myron Borysevych yfirmaður bráðadeildar sjúkrahúsa.

http://zik.com.ua/en/news/2009/10/29/202374

 Tveir af þeim sem létust voru sjúklingar á aldrinum 22-35 ára, tveir aðrir voru yfir sextugt. ( Innskot Agný... En sá fimmti?) Hann greindi sjúkdóminn sem virus lungnabólgu.

Veiru prófanir geta tekið frá einni viku, upp í tvær. Þær eru flóknar og ekki gerðar í Lviv. Gangur veikinnar var mjög hraður. Einkennin fólu í sér mjög háan hita og andstuttan hósta.

 Allt unga fólkið sem lést hafði einkenni alvarlegrar blæðandi lungnabólgu.

Sjúkdómurinn byrjaði rólega, með hita rísandi frá 37.2-37.3

( Innskot Agný. Nú veit ég ekki hvort er verið að tala um farenheit eða celcius..en tel þó það síðara), smá hósta og  verki í liðum. Kvef í nefi byrjaði í lok annars dags eða á þriðja degi.

Stjórnunar umdæmis sérfræðingurinn sagði að krufningin hefði leitt í ljós að lungun voru gegnsósa af blóði.

Þýðandi AGNÝ 

John Holdren, Obama&#39;s Science Czar, says: 

Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/ 

Bilderberg 2009 Intel Already Proving Accurate video and more.

http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/6/

$36+ Billion Dollars to Develop Biological Weapons

 http://www.libertyforlife.com/military-war/us_bio_weapons_development.htm 

VAR AÐ FÁ ÞETTA SENT, ÞANNIG AÐ ÉG GAF MÉR

EKKI TÍMA TIL AÐ ÞÝÐA NÚNA.

 

Obama Science "Czar" John Holdren Openly Advocates Forced Abortions/Sterilizations

 http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/

IAHF List: If you lack time to read this whole alert- please at least skip to the end to see what you must do to oppose the imminent planned destruction of America via Obama signing the Climate Change Treaty in Denmark in December.

If this isn&#39;t stopped, he&#39;ll sign away what little is left of American Sovereignty- and if that happens you will wish you were dead- it would impose genocidal Codex dictates- and more Orwellian nonsense than you can shake a stick at. 

 

AHF List: If you lack time to read this whole alert- please at least skip to the end to see what you must do to oppose the imminent planned destruction of America via Obama signing the Climate Change Treaty in Denmark in December.

If this isn&#39;t stopped, he&#39;ll sign away what little is left of American Sovereignty- and if that happens you will wish you were dead- it would impose genocidal Codex dictates- and more Orwellian nonsense than you can shake a stick at.

 

Just when you thought things couldn&#39;t get any stranger, right after a 

"bioterrorism drill" 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pneumonic-plague-drill-held-in-illinois.html

sponsored by INTERPOL was held in Warsaw, Poland September 29-30th with participants from Central and Eastern European countries (including Ukraine), Ukraine has appears to have been attacked via planes spraying     (skyldi það vera CHEMTRAILS?) 

what appears to be Pneumonic Plague Virus. (Lungnabólgu plágu virus)

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlvfj-NOg0s 

 

In the span of just 6 days, more than 500,000 people have been stricken by the mystery disease in the Ukraine which the government there denies is Pneumonic Plague, and is calling a "mutated strain of H1N1 virus."

Widespread rumors of Ukraine bioterrorism

http://columbiavalleynews.com/news/2009/11/08/widespread-rumors-of-ukraine-bioterrorism/ 

 And now, it appears that a "bioterrorism drill" has just been held in Illinois to defend against, (you guessed it) Pneumonic Plague Virus.....

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pneumonic-plague-drill-held-in-illinois.html

 

Just like before 911, and the London Subway Bombings, government held so called "terrorism drills."

International Bioterrorism Tabletop Exercis

 http://www.interpol.int/Public/BioTerrorism/tabletop/default.asp

 

Coincidence?

 

Or are we under ATTACK by the ruling elite who pull the strings of governments world wide?

Is the real purpose of the swine flu vaccine to weaken our immune systems to set us up for something ELSE such as Pneumonic Plague???

 

If so, what can we do to protect ourselves?

 

HERES WHATS HAPPENING:

 

This is what INTERPOL reports: 

  

http://www.interpol.int/Public/BioTerrorism/tabletop/default.asp 

 

“Organized by the INTERPOL Bioterrorism Unit, this third edition of [a simulated global bioterrorism attack] took place from 29-30 September in Warsaw, Poland. Participants in the workshop numbered 27 from six Central and Eastern European countries (Belarus, Czech Republic, Finland, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine), as well as 15 participants from international organizations such as Europol, the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA), the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control, the European Commission (Directorate General for Health and Consumer Affairs and Directorate General for Justice, Freedom and Security), the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).”

 

ISRAELI  MICROBIOLOGIST TRIED TO WARN US ABOUT BAXTERS LAB IN UKRAINE: 

WAS ATTACKED BY FBI IN LOS ANGELES WHILE IN HIS CAR:

A JAMMING DEVICE WAS USED TO BLOCK HIS CELL PHONE- 

THIS ALL HAPPENED RIGHT AFTER HE WAS LIVE ON TRUE OTT&#39;S RADIO SHOW WHICH HE CALLED INTO- HE WAS NOT ARRESTED:

WAS SMEARED IN THE MEDIA.......WATCH THIS:

 

Baxter&#39;s Ukraine Pneumonic Plague Virus is a BIOWEAPON

https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/pliki/12583668530.pdf

 

dead microbiologists

It seems like the most dangerous profession in the world right now is being a microbiologist. Quite a few have turned up dead in last few years from suicides, car accidents, murder, hit and runs, and more at a rate of one or two every few months.

Is it all a big coincidence, or something far more sinister? Furthermore, why is the mainstream media ignoring this?

  

 

 http://www.suddenlyeverythingsucks.com/issues/wtf_dead_microbiologists.shtml

 

 

 

ADDITIONAL INFO:

 

http://columbiavalleynews.com/news/2009/11/08/widespread-rumors-of-ukraine-bioterrorism/   and  

http://vactruth.com/2009/09/19/joseph-moshe-mossad-microbiologist-%25E2%2580%259Cswine-flu-vaccine-is-bioweapon%25E2%2580%259D/

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11040902/Ukraine_Double.html

 

WHY WE CAN&#39;T IGNORE THIS- Read this hard hitting article....

THE GREEN GENOCIDE AGENDA:

GRÆNA ÞJÓÐARMORÐS-STEFNAN

SAVING THE EARTH BY KILLING HUMANS

BÖRGUM  JÖRÐINNI MEÐ ÞVÍ AÐ DREPA ÍBÚA HENNAR 

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/34/26/

----------

WHAT TO DO TO STOP THIS GENOCIDE AGENDA

 

Watch this You Tube statement by Lord Christopher Monckton, Climate Change Expert who is trying to warn of Obama&#39;s plan to scuttle America via signing a pending climate change Treaty in Copenhagen to be signed in December that will destroy US Sovereignty, putting us totally under the thumb of the genocidal ruling elite: 

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

This treaty will force developed nations to pay a "carbon debt" to developing nations ( communist transfer of wealth), and it is via this means that the ruling elite intend to LEVEL us, to DESTROY the middle class, to ENSLAVE US.

They&#39;re about to impose a communist world government- a global totalitarian state which would include Genocidal UN Codex Vitamin Dictates, but we CAN STOP IT!!

 

Keep in mind that IF we sign this Treaty, our Constitution says that the TREATY takes PRECEDENCE over the Constitution, and once signed, theres NO WAY OUT of it, because the only way out is if all the other countries that signed LET us out, which they&#39;re not going to do because the US would be paying THE MOST MONEY of any signing country....

 

So we MUST RAISE SERIOUS AWARENESS of this threat, and oppose it en masse: go to www.globalclimatescam.com  and take action!

Tell your Senators and congressmen to Oppose Cap and Trade.

 

Don&#39;t take ANY vaccine, especially not the "Swine Flu" vaccine.

The vaccine causes people to GET this weaponized.

Gear up to protect yourself and your family from biowar via taking Vitamin D-3, Vitamin C, and especially Jay Newman&#39;s Ionic Silver:

Order it here: GOT COUNTERMEASURES?  

 

This is the most effective ionic silver on the market, its got a patented enhanced delivery system- its complexed with citrate ions for enhanced bioavailability.

If there was one product I would grab if I was running out the door for my life and we were under biological attack, this is the one I&#39;d take with me. Order a lot. For yourself, your family, your neighbors.

FDA Approved H1N1 Vaccines Contain Ingredients Known to Cause Cancer and Death

http://vactruth.com/2009/10/02/fda-approved-h1n1-vaccines-contain-ingredients-known-to-cause-cancer-and-death/

Skrítin þessi tregi hjá WHO að skýra frá.......

Media Myths on Swin Flu in Ukraine Raise Concerns

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11110902/Ukraine_MM.html

Ukraine Dead Increase to 213 - Still No Sequences

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11110903/Ukraine_213.html 

Total Destruction of Lungs in Ukraine Fatal H1N1 Cases

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11090903/Ukraine_Lungs.html 

WHO Silence on Ukraine Sequences Raises Pandemic Concerns 

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11090906/Ukraine_WHO_SS.html

Timeline on WHO Silence on Ukraine H1N1 Sequences 

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/11090908/Ukraine_WHO_Timeline.html

 

ÖREINDAR ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT MEÐ ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/100509_injectable_nano_microchips.shtml 

 

Vaccines Are One Big Experiment Causing Hundreds of Diseases In The Modern World

 http://preventdisease.com/news/09/092109_vaccines_responsible_for_all_diseases.shtml

It&#39;s almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but nano-microchips invisible to the naked eye are a reality that are already being hosted in wide-range of applications.

The question is, how long will it take governments and big pharma to immerse nano-microchips inside of vaccines  

 

The Risks Of Vaccines Currently Outweigh Any Benefits To Human Health
http://preventdisease.com/home/tips78.shtml#vd
Video Documentaries

Human beings have been exposed to vaccines for more than two centuries.

Some vaccines have been more beneficial than others, however their underlying purpose was supposed to be very simple...to prevent disease. Yet the pathway to effective vaccines has been neither neat nor direct.

Unfortunately, our current vaccination model has little to do with the prevention of disease, something the public is catching on to.

Different researchers have done experiments with what are considered traces and have shown thimerosal "to cause adverse effects on methylation synthesis (MS) activity at concentrations well below the levels produced by thimerosal containing vaccines," said Dr. Waly and associates at Northeastern University.

They found, "The ethylmercury-containing preservative thimerosal inhibited both IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor-1) and dopamine-stimulated methylation with an IC50 of 1nM and eliminated MS activity. It should be noted that reduced IGF-1 levels have been reported in autism, which may also contribute to impaired myelination."

Many say that the charges of the dangers of thimerosal remain to be proven but there is over whelming evidence:

- Scientific studies. 
- Basic chemistry. 
- Documentation. 
- The common experiences of thousands of parents. 
- Records of thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of near-fatal incidents resulting in hospitalization recorded in federal databases. 
- Several new scientific studies that show how "dead wrong" medical authorities are on this vital medical question. 

For reasons that can only be described as basic conflicts of interest, greed, ignorance and even evil intention, one of the most serious crimes in human history has been committed across approximately six decades of time but got much worse in the 1990s as the number of vaccines containing thimerosal increased.

 http://preventdisease.com/home/tips78.shtml  

To tag and surveil global populations?

Nanotechnology (Öreindartækni) deals with structures smaller than one micrometer (less than 1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves developing materials or devices within that size. To put the size of a nanometer in perspective, it is 100,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair.

More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the design and manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude of methodologies for their manufacture in a wide-range of applications including optical, biological, and electronic devices. 

The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials, have enabled the required manufacturing technology towards nanorobots (öreindarvélmenni) for common medical applications, such as surgical instrumentation, diagnosis and drug delivery.

Japan&#39;s Hitachi says it has developed the world&#39;s smallest and thinnest microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down parcels or prove the authenticity of a document.

The integrated circuit (IC) chip is as minute as a speck of dust.

Nanoelectrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used to manage neurological disorders.

Mohammad Reza Abidian,a post-doctoral researcher at the U-M Department of Biomedical Engineering said that polymers in nanotubes "are biocompatible and have both electronic and ionic conductivity."

He further stated "therefore, these materials are good candidates for biomedical applications such as neural interfaces, biosensors and drug delivery systems."

Depending on the objectives of such studies, research could theoretically pave the way for smart recording electrodes that can deliver drugs to positively or negatively affect the immune response.

Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create artificial pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through membranes.

A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified core of a nanomotor, a microscopic biological machine, into a lipid membrane. The resulting channel enabled them to move both single- and double-stranded DNA through the membrane. 

Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with biological channels has been focused on channels large enough to move only single-stranded genetic material.

"Since the genomic DNA of human, animals, plants, fungus and bacteria are double stranded, the development of single pore system that can sequence double-stranded DNA is very important," he says. 

Such engineered channels could have applications in nano-sensing, DNA sequencing, drug loading, including innovative techniques to implement DNA packaging mechanisms of viral nanomotors and vaccine delivery.

"The idea that a DNA molecule travels through the nanopore, advancing nucleotide by nucleotide, could lead to the development of a single pore DNA sequencing apparatus, an area of strong national interest," Guo said.

Scientists working at Queen Mary, University of London, have developed

micrometer-sized capsules to safely deliver drugs inside living cells. 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091001235443.htm

 These "micro shuttles" could hypothetically be loaded with a specific microchip controlling the dose of medication to be opened remotely, releasing their contents.

Örflaga í staðinn fyrir pillur. Hvaðef þú færð ofnæmi fyrir lyfinu..

http://alvaran.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=88 

Besides monitoring the dosage, the same microchip could be used to surveil the patient in conjunction with various tracking systems.

Þar fyrir utan að mæla skammta, þá gæti sama örflaga verið notuð til að hafa efftirlit með sjúklingnum í gegnum hin ýmsu eftirlits kerfi (Eins og t.d. gegnum GPS)
Scientists in the United Kingdom have recently reported 

http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/presspac/presspac/full/10.1021/nn900991r?cookieSet=1 

 advances towards overcoming key challenges in nanotechnology.

They demonstrated how nanoparticles could move quickly in a desired direction without help from outside forces. Their achievement has broad implications, the scientists say, raising the possibility of coaxing cells to move and grow in specific directions. 

Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South Wales, says these advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers. "Biotech companies and their researchers have quickly moved most funding initiatives towards nanotechnology to increase the potency of their vaccines," he said.

If microorganisms inside of vaccines can be coaxed into targeting or invading specific cells, they could achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over conventional vaccines.

"Depending on which side of the vaccine debate you&#39;re on, whether pro or con, nanobots inside vaccine preparations could advance their effectiveness exponentially by either dramatically improving or destroying immunity depending on their design," he added. 

Dorst claims that present day nanobot technology could just as easily be used to advance biological weapons as they can to advance human health. "For every fear that biotech propaganda proliferates about deadly diseases and how vaccines prevent them, it is one more lie to incrementally convince the masses that vaccines are effective."

The worry for Dorst is that one day vaccines "will do what they&#39;ve always been intended for...control of the global populace."

Það veldur Dorst áhyggjum að einn daginn munu bóluefni, "gera akkúrat það sem þeim hefur alltaf verið ætlað að gera...en það er að stjórna fólskjölgun í heiminum."

Nanoemulsion platforms are already capable of developing vaccines from very diverse materials.

Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol, water and detergents can be emulsified into ultra-small particles smaller than 400 nanometers wide (about 1/200th the width of a human hair).

These could be combined with any number of nano-microchips with all or part of disease-causing microbes to trigger the body&#39;s immune system. 

In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.”

The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough:

“At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin."

Russia has recently announced a new manufacturing plant that will strictly produce nano-vaccines.

Rússar hafa nýlega tilkynnt að nýja framleiðslu verksmiðju sem muni einungis framleiða öreindar-bóluefni.

Project plans include development of two vaccines for human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals for boosting the immune system and increasing the efficiency of antibacterial and antiviral drugs, among other initiatives.

The human body is very resistant to nanoparticles that attempt to invade human cells. Scientists are intensely investigating methods to disrupt human enzymes that may degrade nanoparticles.

Experts at the University of Liverpool found a way around this obstacle 

http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Fate-of-Cell-Bound-Nanoparticles-122418.shtml 

 that could mean more efficient, topical drugs in the future, which could act a whole lot faster than the ones currently in use.

All these nanotechnological advances raise many issues and concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential effects on medicine, global economics, as well as speculation about government surveillance.

These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted.

The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release last week saying that it had “today outlined a new research strategy to better understand

 how manufactured nanomaterials may harm human health and the environment.”

http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/epa_nano_wp_2007.pdf 

 Interesting as that strategy document is, it was hardly hot off the presses. 

Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such billionth-of-a-meter-scale constituents as a measure of a product&#39;s state-of-the-art status, implying that ultra-small ingredients are an inherently good thing. They aren’t. Nor does size necessarily make these materials worse than others.

At this point it&#39;s just maddeningly unpredictable what nano things will do. 

Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory measures that may impeed its progression. Many of these critics have staunchly dismissed concerns as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories based on science fiction.

In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters and soldiers in general, have "nanomachines" in their bloodstream, and are used to block pain, allow members of fire teams/patrols to share sensory information, heal bodily damage, as well as manipulating viruses central to video game&#39;s plot line.

Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery, several blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including 

The Matrix Trilogy 

 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/  and

 The Day the Earth Stood Still,  

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0970416/ have dramatized how nanobots could effectively take control of their organic and inorganic targets.
Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as 

Star Trek: First Contact   

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_First_Contact  have also depicted how nanoprobes (nanites) could infect an individual&#39;s bloodstream through a pair of tubules.

Regardless of the recurring themes of nanobots in video games, sci-fi shows and movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips are well on their way to being utilized in ways which may be detrimental to human health and freedom on a global scale.

The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments and pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and leverage over global populations for more profit and more control. 

In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life.

Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. 

Today&#39;s microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe.

Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.)

The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS). 

When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person.

Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced.

Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target&#39;s performance.

With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads. 

Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices.

Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person&#39;s brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.

The NSA&#39;s electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints.

With electromagnetic frequency (EMF)

http://preventdisease.com/news/articles/electro_risk.shtml  brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target.

This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.

The mass media has not reported that an implanted person&#39;s privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. She/he can be manipulated in many ways.

Using different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even change a person&#39;s emotional life.

Með því að nota mismunandi bylgjur, þá getur stjórnandi tækisins jafnvel breytt tilfinningalífi manneskjunnar. 

She can be made aggressive or lethargic.

Hægt er að gera hana/hann árásargjarna eða sljóa/sinnulausa.

(Innskot AGNÝ. Þá er þarna kominn grundvöllur til að koma manneskjunni á x geðlyf ..þetta snýst allt um peninga...ekkert annað!) 

Sexuality can be artificially influenced.

Hægt er að hafa áhrif á  kynhneigð.  

Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.

Hugsana merki og undirvitund er hægt að lesa, hafa áhrif á drauma og jafnvel auka, allt án vitneskju eða vitundar ígræddu manneskjunnar.

This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard anything about it.

Þessi leynilega tækni hefur verið notuð af hervöldum í vissum NATO löndum síðan um 1980 án þess að hinn almenni borgari og akademíur hafi haft vitneskju um það. 

Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.

Það eru litlar upplýsingar fáanlegar um þetta innrásar hugar -stjórnandi kerfi  í fag- og háskóla tímaritum.

The NSA&#39;s Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain.

Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative.

A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.

Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields

 and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed by democratically elected governments.

However, there is currently no interest by any national government to seriously address this issue.

Hvað sem því líður þá er sem stendur enginn áhugi hjá alþjóða stjórnvöldum til þess að skoða þessi mál af einhverri alvöru.

The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of vaccines is speculative.

It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is here and we already unaware of their integration within pharmaceuticals.

Regardless, due to the many military and political advantages, their implementation is inevitable.

However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations. 

In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency guidelines which could enforce such a mandate.

Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the inoculations.

Public participation is an essential tool that will soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool ever designed into billions of people.

Although nanotechnology manufacturing is currently available on a global scale, before biotech companies are able to initiate mass production and testing of nano-microchips inside of vaccines, they will likely sell the idea to the public.

Through various "health enhancement scenarios" they will encourage participation and publicly announce regulatory approval from the same policies and regulatory agencies they helped create. 

By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control (CDC) effectively hyped a false flu pandemic 

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/090109_flu_hype.shtml and convinced the world to submit to H1N1 vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and possibly a biological event, may equally convince populations to knowingly accept microchips inside of vaccines under the guise of a "greater good" for humanity.

When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest.

This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry, nanorobotics and information exchanged at international congresses.

The time to act is now!

Nanotechnology Takes Off

 

Brain Chipping: Injectible Micro-Chips

One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 1)

 

One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 2)

Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 1 of 3

Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 2 of 3

Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 3 of 3

What is MASS ?

Vaccines Are One Big Experiment Causing Hundreds of Diseases In The Modern World

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/092109_vaccines_responsible_for_all_diseases.shtml

MASS is an acronym for many chronic illnesses and diseases that impair blood flow - "Moulden Anoxia Spectrum Syndromes."

One-size-fits-all global vaccination schemes have created MASS disorders on mass scales.

MASS disorders, from infectious diseases to vaccinations, have a common sequence of injuries which includes impaired blood flow, oxygenation, blood carrying capacity, and non-specific immune hyper-stimulation. 

 This is how Vioxx caused heart attack and stroke.

This is how pre-natal German measles caused autism-spectrum and organ damages.

This is how a systemic drop in maternal blood pressure, during gestation,causes Mobius syndrome(and autism-spectrum).

This is how repeat vaccination is causing dementia.

MASS is how vaccinations are causing a multitude of chronic illnesses and disease. It is not the germs causing this problem. It is the response of the body to de-railed and unbalanced immune challenges. 

Solutions without Vaccines

There is a better way to prevent disease. Vaccination only masks the cause of disease, it does nothing to address the core problem in physiology - the non-specific MASS response and colloidal stability of blood flow dynamics. There are alternative solutions to controlling infectious diseases in populations that do not require injecting foreign substances into your body. 

Simple solutions are very effective. Besides an abundance of immunity enhancers, if you use the power of nature and expose your body to greater amounts of sunlight, eat a variety of leafy greens and organic fruits/vegetables, invest at least 20-30 minutes per day exercising, and adopt a nutritional regimen of clean unprocessed foods, vitamins,minerals, superfoods and herbs, not only will this advance your health, you may never get sick again!

 

Vaccines Are Producing The Pandemic, Not The Flu 

http://preventdisease.com/news/09/081809_swine_flu_hype.shtml 

 

BÓLUSETTUR MEÐ VALDI OG LÖGBOÐIÐ RFID FYLGT EFTIR MEÐ HERVALDI. VIDEOS

Forced vaccinations:

a whistleblowers clear warning-reposted by Project Camelot

 The original poster of the video was endtimes777 a very brave young woman. She is (as far as we know) a 37 year old Army Engineer and over the weekend of Sept 12-13 in the LA are attended a drill with colleagues, including California Highway Patrol, LA County Sheriffs, and LAPD. 

One of these colleagues told her that he had recently been training to establish roadblocks in the LA area.

She references the testimony of former State Trooper Greg Evensen here:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=P3DpNBToYl4   

********************************************************************  

Well...I guess there was too much truth in this video ..since this comes up now...

This show on youtube now the 26 Oct. 2014..

This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been closed.

Sorry about that. 

Ég var að uppfæra og yfirfara þetta blogg sem er orðið rúmlega 5 ára og það sem er neðst á blogginu er orðið 10 ár gamalt...!!!

Skoðið hér inni

SECRET MILITARY CODES DISCOVERED

Started by Agný , 16 Apr 2004 04:26 

 http://www.malefnin.com/ib//index.php?showtopic=7256 

I M Just updating the informations on this blog... 

AND added this here on the 26 October 2014!

...and shows clearly readable documentation and a photo (taken by her colleague) of what she states is an RFID tracking device, more information about which is here: 

I m Just updating the informations on this blog... and somebody do not want x informations be for the public eyes.. they have been removed ..not altered or updated.

I added this here on the 26 October 2014! 

Einhver vill ekki að x upplýsingar séu til ...bara verið eytt eins og kom í ljós þegar ég smellti á þessa linka..

http://cejayeng.com/products.php?id=59

Not Found The requested URL /products.php was not found on this server. Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request.

http://sovereign-publications.com/s-l...

Bad Request (Invalid Hostname)

http://blutube.policeone.com/Clip.asp...

This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.

WELL- THIS IS THE ONLY LINK WHO WORK NOW ON THE 26 OCTOBER 2014!!

http://soldiersystems.net/tag/cejay-engineering/

*********************************************************************** 

 It&#39;s a little unclear what information she has learned at first hand and what she&#39;s learned from others whom she trusts.

She states that she knows that the dates for the two waves of forced vaccinations are October 15 and November 15.

It&#39;s not stated how she knows this.

However: the information reported seems credible and if true, could not be more important.

Watch carefully and please distribute widely.

If you do so, please copy the above information - which is important to understand clearly.

We ask the young woman concerned to contact us at [e-mail] so that we can talk to her personally in full confidence.

 INGAORAMA (2 minutes ago) 

As I see it the clear meaning of the word beast is "animal" and I&#39;m sure they are going to "tag" us with numbers and I would not be surprized if three first letter´s will be 666 in the RFID and then our ID mumber..
They see us as animal´s = beast.

This is how I see this word´s in the Bible today..

 

INGAORAMA (12 minutes ago)  

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your currage.. 
They are going to do genocide with ..we are to many who want a piece of the cake from these elite..

Vaccine, Chemtrail, fluoride, and drugging and dumbing the rest..

The Mark Of The Beast means we human will bee marked as we were "sheep´s"

THAT IS WHAT THE MEANING IS IN THE BIBLE!! 

THAT IS THE MEANING OF RFID! 

 

Military checkpoints to enforce swine flu vaccination shots! Mandatory RFID chip = 666 mark

 

Military is set to enforce the taking of the swine flu vaccine. Check points, papers and or chip to verify your compliance! Wake up people, the time is at hand!

 KANSKI ER ÞETTA VIDEO HÉR AKKURAT AÐ SÝNA OKKUR VIÐ HVERJU MEGI BÚAST

SVONA "DRILL" FYRIR ÞAÐ SEM SEGIR BÆÐI Á UNDAN OG  EFTIR VIDEOINU HÉR...

HÉR ER SKO GREINILEGT AÐ FASISTINN HEFUR SÝNT SITT RÉTTA ANDLIT!..

G20 PROTEST AND MARTIAL LAW, Police use sound CANNONS and Tear Gas Pittsburgh

 

 

 

SECRET MILITARY CODES DISCOVERED, faldir í

vegamerkingum!

 http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/926941/

 

A secret military organization took part in the raid at Waco  

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/secretmilitary.htm 

 Það sjást ekki allir linkarnir og hér er einn sem virðist ekki virka en kanski kemur hann í ljós þegar ég set færsluna inn..

En þið getið séð á síðunni að allt sem er hvítt eru linkar  

Ég póstaði þetta hér fyrir 5 árum síðan 

 

 SECRET MILITARY CODES DISCOVERED, faldir í vegamerkingum!

 http://www.malefnin.com/ib//index.php?showtopic=7256

The truth can now be told! 

 Embedded in our nation&#39;s road sign system is a secret coding designed to target vital sites, facilities, routes and resources for military confiscation during a National Emergency.

Though, concealed by the lies of the Department of Transportation for many years, "Free Indeed Research" has tapped deeply into one of the most clever, and deceptive cover-up operations to come down the pike in years! 

 If you think GPS will be working normally in the scenario described herein, think again.

The United Nations military has plans to become the cop soldiers of the world. Unknown to the general populace, a   (SMELLIÐ  Á LINKINN HÉR )

"Rapid Deployment" 

force stands ready to enter U.S. borders at the request of the President of the United States during a national emergency.

They will perform "peacekeeping" operations such as evacuations, rounding up dissenters, confiscating firearms and incuring facilities and sites for military use.

These forces are laced with foreign troops that do not speak english. 

There fore, as a tactical advance, all nations have been secretly revamping their roads sign systems to conform to an international standard under the guise of the WTO.

It is our belief that these signs and reflective markers "TACMARS" on the backs of many signs are coded to target vital sites, facilities and resources to be confiscated and used by these troops.  

 

 *TACMARS* pointing to a "RITE AID" pharmacy with "ONE HOUR"

passport, photo ID; drive-thru window with scanners, inoculation center

to vaccinate populace.

Fólksfjölgunar stjórnun..VIDEO Enginn þorir að kalla það þjóðarmorð.. &#39;POPULATION CONTROL- NONE DARE CALL IT GENOCIDE&#39;

 http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/464864/

 

BANDARÍSKI SJÓHERINN MUN STJÓRNA ROSALEGRI ANDRÚMSLOFTS TILRAUNA PRÓFUN

 

U.S.  NAVY  TO  CONDUCT  MASSIVE

ATMOSPHERIC  EXPERIMENTAL  TESTS

http://newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind121.htm

 

By Rosalind Peterson
September 9, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

Starting as early as today, September 15, 2009

An article in Space.com (1) titled, 

“NASA Rocket to Create Clouds Tuesday” 

Nasa  mun skjóta á loft eldflaug til að búa til ský á fimmtudag

by Clara Moskowits, Staff Writer – September 14, 2009, was unexpectedly forwarded to me today.

Eerie Cloud Created by NASA Rocket Experiment 

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/090920-nasa-noctilucent-cloud-rocket.html

An eerie cloud that glowed briefly in the night sky Saturday was no UFO.

It was created by humans - more specifically a NASA rocket built to make clouds that shine at night.

The rocket launched as part of an experiment to artificially create so-called noctilucent -or night-shining - clouds, the highest clouds on Earth.

They naturally appear around 50 miles (80 km) above Earth&#39;s high latitudes and are also known as polar mesospheric clouds.

  

Strange Clouds Spotted at the Edge of Space 

 

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080901-mm-night-shining.html

Space Station Crew Photographs Mysterious Clouds that Shine at Night

 

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/strange_clouds_030219.html 

Satellite Sheds Light on Brightest Clouds

http://www.livescience.com/environment/071211-noctilucent-clouds.html 

Mysterious Clouds Creeping Out of the Arctic

http://www.livescience.com/environment/070628_night_clouds.html 

 How do you like your skies ... Natural or man-made?

http://californiaskywatch.com/ 

Space.com: NASA Rocket to Create Clouds Tuesday   Sep 14, 2009 ... ... to create artificial clouds at the outermost layers of Earth's atmosphere. ... Station Crew Photographs Mysterious Clouds that Shine at Night. www.space.com/7282-nasa-rocket-create-clouds-tuesday.html

 

 

According to the article:

“…A rocket experiment set to launch Tuesday aims to create artificial clouds at the outermost layers of Earth&#39;s atmosphere. The project, called the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE)…

"This is really essentially at the boundary of space," said Wayne Scales, a scientist at Virginia Tech who will…study the physics of the artificial dust cloud as it&#39;s released…

CARE is slated to launch Tuesday between 7:30 and 7:57 p.m. EDT (2330 and 2357 GMT) from NASA&#39;s Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia….”

“…CARE will release its (aluminum oxide) (2), dust particles a bit higher than that, then let them settle back down to a lower altitude.

”What the CARE experiment hopes to do is to create an artificial dust layer,” Professor Scales told SPACE.com. 

"Hopefully it&#39;s a creation in a controlled sense, which will allow scientists to study different aspects of it, the turbulence generated on the inside, the distribution of dust particles and such." 

CARE is a project of the Naval Research Laboratory and the Department of Defense Space Test Program. 

The spacecraft will launch aboard a NASA four-stage Black Brant XII suborbital sounding rocket…

Researchers will track the CARE dust cloud for days or even months to study its behavior and development over time…

If CARE cannot launch Tuesday, the team can try again between Sept. 16 and Sept. 20, 2009…”

 The U.S. Navy, NASA, and the U.S. Defense Department have made a decision to conduct one or more an atmospheric tests, in order to create an aluminum oxide dust cloud without the permission and for the most part, the knowledge of the citizens of the United States. 

These aluminum oxide particles will eventually return to earth polluting our air, water and soils. 

The tests may damage the various atmospheric boundaries that protect life on earth – no one has any idea what damage this dust cloud and the testing on this dust cloud may do to our climate, agriculture, human health or the amount of infrared and UV radiation reaching the Earth.

It is time to contact elected officials today and protest this action which may begin as early as today, September 14, 2009. 

The Navy is already conducting warfare testing in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico and has more ranges in the planning and permit stages. 

Senator Dianne Feinstein and Senator Barbara Boxer noted in a June 19, 2009.

 Letter to Dr. Jane Lubchenco, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce:

“…the Navy plans to increase the number of its exercises or expand the areas in which they may occur, and virtually every coastal state will be affected. 

Some exercises may occur in the nation’s most biologically sensitive marine habitats, including National Marine Sanctuaries and breeding habitats…” 

This involves the decimation of more than 11.7 million marine mammals over five years and will increase with each new warfare testing range expansion.

MARINE  MAMMALS  WILL  DIE  IN  NAVY  WARFARE  TESTING  PROGRAM 

http://newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind115.htm 

TESTING IN THE PACIFIC, ATLANTIC, GULF OF MEXICO, HAWAII & ALASKA TESTING INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO:

* Gunnery Exercises 

* Bombing Missions 

* Missile & Torpedo Firing 

* Underwater Detonations

 * Research & Testing 

* Vessel Sinking

* Use of hundreds of toxic chemicals, like lead, mercury, tungsten, aluminum coated fiberglass (chaff), Airborne Obscurants like Red & White Phosphorus, fog oils, rocket and jet fuel emissions 

* Undersea Warfare Training Range Exercises (USWTR) 

* Mid and High Frequency Sonar Experiments 

* Both land and ocean exercises will use planes, drones, rockets and sonic booms 

* Other classified warfare testing experiments will be conducted in these areas.

 Now the U.S. Navy has decided that these experiments are not enough and have added atmospheric testing to their test list. 

Once again the public has been cut out of the debate, given little or no warning, and there are no Congressional hearings planned for any of these warfare and atmospheric tests.

 It is now time that we, the people, stand up and stop these tests. The Navy and the Department of Defense have to understand that they are not allowed to go to war on us and our oceans for any reason. It is time to make our elected officials aware that we are going to stand against these policies. Take action today – contact your elected officials and stop these new atmospheric tests and demand Congressional Hearings.

For more information: 
Website:

1 - U.S. Navy & NASA Dust Cloud Experiments May Begin on Tuesday, September 15, 2009 Live Science.com September 14, 2009 Article By Clara Moskowitz, Staff Writer
2 - Space.com Strange Clouds Spotted at the Edge of Space by Jeremy Hsu, Staff Writer September 1, 2009 
3 - Space Station Crew Photographs Mysterious Clouds that Shine at Night by Tony Phillips Scinece.NASA.gov February 19, 2003 
4 - An Update on the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE) Paul A. Bernhardt - [e-mail] 
“…Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375 Abstract. 

The radar scatter from artificial dusty plasma is space will be studied using at chemical release during the Charged Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE) in August or September 2009. 

CARE will be launch from Wallops Island, Virginia on a trajectory that takes the care release module to an apogee of 360 km altitude for a release on the downleg at 280 km altitude. 

110 kg of aluminum oxide particulates will be injected from a 2-meter long canister with the exit port pointed to the nadir. 

A 60 degree ½ angle cone of dust will be injected with a velocity of between 2 and 3 km/s. 

The dust will become charged in the ionosphere to form negatively charged dust particles.

Duftið mun verða hlaðið í jónahvolfinu til þess að mynda neikvætt hlaðnar rykagnir.

The streaming dust will provide a source for turbulence due to charge separation electric fields and to two-stream instabilities. 

Ground radars operating at HF, VHF and UHF frequencies will probe the release region looking for enhanced backscatter. 

The HF radar be digital ionosondes be located near the launch site. 

The VHF radar will be located on Bermuda looking perpendicular to the magnetic field lines. 

The UHF radar will be located at Millstone Hill in Massachusetts. 

At late times, the particles will for an artificial dust cloud that will settle to about 100 km altitude. 

The measurements during this later phase will provide data on the transport of charged dust by lower-thermospheric winds…”
5 - Gelatinous Gelation in Aerosols; Non-Mean-Field Aggregation and Kinetics C.M. Sorensen and A. Chakrabarti Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas NASA Report 2008 Study [Link] [Link] [Link] 
6 - Virginia Tech – Wayne Scales Charged Aerosol Particle Experiments September 14, 2009 Search
7 - MASS Spectrometry Talk
8 - Professor Scales – Charged Aerosol Particle Experiments – H.A.A.R.P.
9 - Could the H.A.A.R.P. Project in Alaska, NOAA, DOE, NASA, Air Force, Department of Defense, etc., be the reason for climate changes that have been escalating since the late 1980s, when the funds and technology allowed for the escalation of atmospheric heating and testing programs like NASA’s TMA Night Cloud tests using trimethylaluminum or the advanced testing of military weapons systems like star wars?

NASA’s Night Clouds Atmospheric Testing Program: 

 10 - The NASA / U.S. Air Force CRESS 1990 Press Kit outlines an atmospheric NASA testing program (linked to H.A.A.R.P. and the U.S. Air Force, that could produce the Vibrant Spectrums (auroras), referenced above, as shown in my poster pictures. 

In this program canisters are loaded with chemicals and superheated at different atmospheric levels.

These canisters contain the following chemicals that could be polluting our air and are showing up with unusual spikes in drinking water supplies in across California (California State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division Water Test Results-Public Records, Sacramento, California): 

Aluminum, Barium, Strontium, Lithium, Calcium, SF6-Sulfur hexafluoride 

11 - Note that SF6 is a very potent, toxic gas. 

It has the energy-trapping potential of 25,000 times that of Carbon Dioxide. 

The EPA has taken action to restrict release of this dangerous greenhouse gas and yet it is being used in atmospheric testing programs. 
12 - Barium Releases March 22, 1976
13 - Lithium Red Sky April 16, 1979 – Alaska Science Forum:
14 - Alaska&#39;s Space Pyrotechnics – Alaska Science Forum 

– Barium February 18, 1985

Cute sky written smiley face raises pertinent questions

http://californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/skywritten_smiley_face.htm 

 

 

 Barium: The Poison No One Talks About  

Barium is just as dangerous as arsenic, mercury and lead and it shows up regularly in public water supplies. 

Barium is a major component of chemtrails. 

When it falls to earth it also contaminates our water supplies.

Exposure to small amounts of barium, dissolved in water, may cause a person to experience these problems:

1. Breathing difficulties - ÖNDUNAR ERFIÐLEIKAR 

2. Increased blood pressure -HÆKKAÐUR BLÓÐÞRÝSTINGUR 

3. Heart rhythm changes - BREYTINGAR Á HJARTSLÆTTI 

4. Stomach irritation - PIRRINGUR Í MAGA

5. Muscle weakness - VÖÐVASLAPPLEIKI
6. Alterations in nerve reflexes - BREYTINGAR Á TAUGAVIÐBRÖGÐUM
7. Damage to your brain, liver, kidney and heart - VELDUR SKAÐA Á HEILA, LIFUR, NÝRUM OG HJARTA.

Barium Tests are Positive -- Clifford Carnicom