Some Pregnant Women Fearful of H1N1 Vaccine
Færsluflokkur: Heilbrigðismál
20.6.2011 | 17:12
SYNFLORIX -bóluefni gegn pneumókokkum /EYRNBÓLGUM/ LUNGNABÓLGU ..ARGENTÍNSK STJÓRNVÖLD RANNSAKA DAUÐSFÖLL BÓLUSETTRA BARNA MEÐ SYNFLORIX BÓLUEFNINU..
LUNGNABÓLGU BÓLUEFNI EKKI EINS VIRKT OG TALIÐ VAR
Pneumonia Vaccine Not as Effective as Thought
Lífshættulegt afbrigði af lugnabólgu sem hefur áhrif á börn hefur risið mjög hratt í Bretlandi. Lungnabólgu tilfelli, þekkt sem serotype 1, hefur aukist tífalt á áratug. Þetta alvarlega afbrigði af lungnabólgu sýkir fóður lungnanna sem kallast pleura, sem veldur öndunarerfiðleikum. Orsök aukningarinnar er óþekkt, en sérfræðingar óttast að bóluefni gæti spilað þar inn í.
Þá fittar það náttúrulega að hin Íslenska (ó) heilbrigðismaskína sé búin að bæta við í ungbarnabólusetningarnar ( frá 03 mán - 18 ára) bóluefni sem þeir segja að sé við/gegn eyrnabólgu (Innskot Agný og heilum haug af öðru en ég held samt að foreldrum sé sagt að þetta sé "eyrnabólgu" bóluefni ) en það var/er byrjað að bólusetja með því,.... http://landlaeknir.is/pages/856
Bóluefni gegn pneumókokkum (gefið við 3, 5 og 12 mánaða aldur í sérstakri sprautu, frá 1. apríl 2011). Aukaverkanir eru vægar. Á stungustað getur komið verkur, roði og bólga og barnið getur fengið hita.
en það er bara kallað Pneumókokkar inni á http://landlaeknir.is/pages/856 en það er hin"almenna" upplýsinga síða fyrir "almenning " um bólusetningar..
En endilega lesið ykkur til sjálf..en það er greinilega ekki lagt mikið upp úr upplýsingum á þessari síðu Landlæknis embættisins..
Pneumókokkar eru bakteríur sem geta valdið alvarlegum og lífshættulegum sjúkdómum svo sem heilahimnubólgu, blóðsýkingum, lungnabólgu, eyrnabólgu og kinnholusýkingum, einkum hjá yngstu börnunum. Hættulegastir þessara sjúkdóma eru heilahimnubólga og blóðsýkingar, en árlega greinast um 11 börn hér á landi með slíkar sýkingar. Með því að bólusetja gegn hættulegustu stofnum bakteríunnar má koma í veg fyrir allt að 90% þessara sjúkdóma.
Synflorix - nýtt bóluefni gegn pneumókokkum
Þann 30. maí sl. gaf Lyfjastofnun út markaðsleyfi fyrir Synflorix, nýju 10-gildu pneumókokkabóluefni frá GSK. Synflorix er ætlað til bólusetningar gegn djúpum sýkingum og bráðri miðeyrnabólgu af völdum pneumókokka hjá ungbörnum og börnum frá 6 vikna til 2 ára aldurs.EN .........
9.9.2008 | 06:14 
Vilhjálmur Ari
Increase in severe pneumonia in children may be caused by vaccine / AUKNNG Á ALVARLEGRI LUNGNABÓLGU HJÁ BÖRNUM GETUR VERIÐ AF VÖLDUM BÓLUEFNA
ARGENTÍNSK STJÓRNVÖLD RANNSAKA DAUÐSFÖLL BÓLUSETTRA BARNA MEÐ SYNFLORIX BÓLUEFNINU..
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/637512/
Þannig...eins og venjulega æðir hin Íslaneska "heilbrigðismaskína" af stað með lyf (bóluefni eru flokkuð sem lyf) án þess að birta eða skoða niðurstöður úr klínískum prófunum..ja allavega get ég ekki séð en svo sé gert í sambandi við þetta bóluefni Synflorix ..
Enn dregst bólusetning gegn miðeyrnabólgu barna á Íslandi
Höfundur
Vilhjálmur AriHöfundur er heimilislæknir (1991) og starfar á Heilsugæslunni Firði, Hafnarfirði og Slysa- og bráðamóttöku LSH. Doktorspróf frá Læknadeild HÍ 2006 og klínískur dósent við Heilsugæslu Höfuðborgarsvæðisins frá 2009. Lætur sér sérstaklega annt um gott og réttlátt heilbrigðiskerfi og skynsamlega notkun lyfja.
INNSKOT AGNÝ....Skyldi þessi læknir hafa einhvern fjárhagslegan ávinning af því að prómote þessa bólusetningu?
9.3 2011
ÚRDRÁTTUR ÚR BLOGG-FÆRSLUNNI.. Til stóð að hefja bólusetningar í apríl nk. en aðeins hjá börnum fæddum það herrans ár 2011. Búið var að taka tilboði GlaxoSmithKline með bóluefnið Synflorix en mótkeppnisaðilinn í útboðinu, Icepharma ehf. náði að kæra og þarf því að fara fram nýtt útboð. Nokkra mánaða töf getur verið yngstu börnum dýrkeypt því hámarks árangur næst aðeins ef byrjað er að bólusetja börn við 3 mánaða aldur.
Áður hefur verið gagnrýnt að ekki skuli öllum börnum til 3 ára aldurs vera boðin ókeypis bólusetning. Þá yrði hún mun skilvirkari og börnum væri ekki mismunað í heilsuverndinni, nokkuð sem skiptir miklu máli þegar traust foreldra á henni er í húfi. Í dag eru hins vegar margir foreldrar sem kjósa að kaupa þessa bólusetningu fyrir börnin sín en kostnaður fyrir hvert barn sem þarf þrjár bólusetningar er um 36.000 kr.
**********************************************************************************************
Yfirvöld Argentínu eru að rannsaka möguleg tengsl milli dauðsfalla 14 barna og tilrauna bóluefnis sem þau fengu vegna klínískrar prófunar framkvæmdri af GlaxoSmithKline.
Dauðsföllin geta tengst Synflorix bóluefninu, sem er ætlað til að berjast gegn lugnabólgu, eyrnabólgum og fjölmörgum öðru sem orsakað er af lungnabólgusýkli.
A.U.S. talsmaður GlaxoSmithKline sagði að fyrirtækið tengdi ekki dauðsföllin við tilrauna bóluefnið, sem hefur verið prófað í þrem Latin Amerískum löndum og fleiri stöðum um heiminn...( Innskot Agný..Hversu lengi prófað?)
12 börn dóu á meðan þau tóku þátt í bóluefna tilraun í Argentínu.
Að minnsta kosti 12 börn sem voru þáttakendur í klínískri rannsókn á lungnabólgu bóluefni hafa dáið í Argentínu á þeim tíma sem rannsóknin var á síðasta ári. Þessi rannsókn var fjámögnuð af GlaxoSmithKline og þeir notuðu börn frá fátækum fjölskyldum.
Samkvæmt Argentine Federation of Health Professionals, þá voru fjölskyldurnar bæði „beittar þvingunum og hótunum“ til skrifa undir eyðublöð til samþykktar. Bóluefna prófununni er enn haldið áfram þrátt fyrir fordæminguna.
HEIMILDIR
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1750553/
Aukning lungnabólgu tilfella tengd bóluefni.
http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Pneumonia-Increase-Linked-to-Vaccine-60506.aspx
Argentina fines drug company over vaccine trial
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/03/world/americas/argentina-drug-company-fined
Synflorix
http://www.vaxchoicevt.com/synflorix/
Bóluefnið Prevenar (Prevnar, the Pediatric Pneumococcal Vaccine Wyeth Lederle manufactures Prevnar ) sem er ætlað gegn sjúkdómum orsökuðum af lungnabólgusýkli, og var kynnt árið 2006, gæti verið að ýta undir aukninguna. Bóluefnið er gefið 2 mán, 4 mán og 13 mánaða gömlum börnum.
Það eru meira en 90 þekkt afbrigði af bakteríum sem valda lungnabólgu, og þegar einu er útrýmt með bóluefni, þá skapar það möguleika fyrir annað að koma í staðinn.
Í U.S., frá því að Prevenar var kynnt árið 2000, hafa rannsóknaraðilar tilkynnt um uppgang af „sero-replacement“ sjúkdóm--- lungnabólgu afbrigði sem bóluefnið tekur ekki fyrir.
Increase in severe pneumonia in children may be caused by vaccine / AUKNNG Á ALVARLEGRI LUNGNABÓLGU HJÁ BÖRNUM GETUR VERIÐ AF VÖLDUM BÓLUEFNA
Þýðandi Agný.
GAGNRÝNI Á BÓLUEFNIÐ PREVNAR
Critique of Prevnar Vaccine
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/prevnar.htm
Part I:
MÖGULEGIR HAGSMUNA ÁREKSTRAR Í PRÓFUNUM, MARKÐSETNINGU OG SAMÞYKKIS…
Potential Conflicts of Interest in Testing, Promotion & Approval
Drs. Black & Shinefield: Wyeth Lederle Paid for Prevnar Studies Drs. Black and Shinefield of Kaiser Permanente undertook the primary studies cited regarding Prevnar. Wyeth Lederle, the vaccine’s manufacturer, paid for these studies.
Drs. Black & Shinefield: Wyeth Lederle Paid for Conferences. These doctors have also presented Prevnar at various conferences throughout the world. Wyeth Lederle subsidized these conferences.
AUKNING Á ALVARLEGUM LUNGNABÓLGU TILFELLUM HJÁ BÖRNUM GÆTU VERIÐ AF VÖLDUM BÓLUEFNA..
Increase in severe pneumonia in children may be caused by vaccine
Journal American Geriatrics Society February 2003;51(2):240-5
References
Richard Kent Zimmerman, MD, MPH. et.al. Routine Vaccines Across the Life Span, 2001. J of Fam. Pr. Oct. 2001,Vol. 50, No. 10.
138. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Healthy People 2000.Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 1990
AWP=Average Wholesale Price. List of Immunizing Agents and Average Wholesale Prices for 2002. PA Bulletin Doc. No. 02-1897.
Aukning lungnabólgu tilfella tengd bóluefni. Bóluefnið veldur auknngu á bakteríu sýkingum sem það átti að koma í veg fyrir!
GSK malpractice case raises questions about trial standards
http://www.vaxchoicevt.com/synflorix/
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2812%2960217-7/fulltext?rss=yes
Serious Diseases on the Rise Due to Possible Vaccine-Induced Bacterial and Viral Adaptations
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/01/15/dr-nass-on-vaccination.aspx
This Revolting Practice Targets Poor Unsuspecting People First - And You Next
Study: GSK vaccine may increase risk of convulsion, death
STOP! Read This Before Vaccinating for Anything
ATHUGASEMDIR FRÁ ÞÝÐANDA OG HÖFUNDI...
sem er félagi í
FÉLAGI ÁHUGAMANNA UM BÓLUSETNINGAR KT.541011-0210
En pælið aðeins í þessu að þetta bóluefni SYNFLORIX er landlæknisembættið byrjað að bólusetja börn hér á landi með!
Og það er kallað eyrnabólgubóluefni en bæði Prevnar bóluefnið sem kallað er lungnabólgubóluefni eru í raun fyrir báða þættina..
Afhverju notuðu þeir þá ekki Prevnar fyrir börn líka?
Ekki bara fólk með lungnasjúkdóma eða einhverskonar öndunarfærasjúkdóma..þó svo ég vilji ekki sjá hvorug þeirra!
Pabbi minn heitinn var einn af þeim sem átti við öndunarfærasjúkdóma að stríða og hafði þar að auki fengið lungnabólgu þegar hann var ungur maður, en það var sko vegna forkælingar..
Hann þurfti að keyra mjólkina á opnum traktor marga kílómetra hvort sem var vetur eða sumar..
Og forkæling var helsta ástæða fyrir lungnabólgu í denn ..
En af einhverri undarlegri ástæðu þá var pabbi lagstur inn á spítala 5 dögum eftir að vera bólusettur með Prevnar (lungnabólgubóluefninu) með verstu lungnabólgu ever!
Hvernig gat það skeð nema það að hann var með veiklað ónæmiskerfi (var kominn með ristilkrabba en ekki komið í ljós)
Þannig að fólk getur átt það á hættu að fá það sem það er bólusett fyrir sé það með einhvern undirliggjandi krónískan sjúkdóm því að ónæmiskerfið er sko á fullu að berjst við þann sjúkdóm og ræður ekki við að mynda mótefni gegn því efni/virus sem dælt er í þig þannig að þú átt á hættu að fá þann sjúkdóm.
En þetta viðurkennir ekkert af þessu heilbrigðisstarfandi liði allavega ekki opinberlega og munu trúlega segja mig fara með rangfærslur og og mistúlkanir eins og þeir hafa gert við skrifum Þorsteins Schevings Thorsteinssonar í dagblöðunum.
En pælið líka í öðru að "mark"hóparnir fyrir eins og t.d. svína flesnsu bóluefnið voru einstaklingar með króníska og undirliggjandi sjúkdóma, börn og ófrískar konur...
Og allir þessir einstaklingar eru með ónæmiskerfið ekki tilbúið til að takast á við auka áreiti..
Og svo þegar einstaklingar hafa dáið rétt á eftir að vera bólusettur x klukkutímum eða x dögum ( og hvað með hinn svokallað vöggudauða sem af einhverri "tilviljun" helst í hendur við þá mánuði sem ungabörn eru bólusett) að þá sé það ekki bóluefninu að kenna heldur því að viðkomandi var með undirliggjandi sjúkdóm...!
Röksemdarfærsla þessa liðs er sko ekki upp á einn þorsk einu sinni!
Ég gleymdi að vísu að taka það fram að pabbi var líka bólusettur með hinni árlegu flensu (ég segi með en ekki við ) um leið og lungnabólgu bólusetningunni..
Þannig að það var enn meira álag á ónæmiskerfið en ef hann hefði kanski bara fengið aðra þeirra í einu..
En reyndar er langmesta magn kvikasilfurs í flensubóluefninu af öllum bóluefnum (Thimerosal) já það er það ! Þeir mega reyna að troða þessu öfugu ofan í mig Faraldur og co en á meðan að þeir birta enga bæklinga eða upplýsingar almennt um það hvaða uppfyllingarefni eru í bóluefnum þá er best fyrir þá að þegja.
En það virðist vera hefð hjá landlæknisembættinu/sóttvarnar að halda upplýsingum frá hinum almenna borgara..hræða en ekki fræða til hlýðni..
En ég tel að það sé skylda að láta þessar upplýsingar með fyrir fólk áður en bólusett er, því bóluefni eru jú flokkuð sem lyf, og ég held að það sé skylda að láta fylgja upplýsingar með öllu lyfjum, um það hvaða innihaldsefni eru í lyfjunum, hvaða virku efni séu , hvaða aukaverkanir vægar sem alvarlegar ..en nei af einhverri ástæðu eru bóluefni undanþegin því hér á landi..
Þá spyr ég aftur hvað er verið að fela þar sem framleiðendur sjálfir gefa út innihaldslýsingar um hvað er í bóluefnunum og af einhverri ástæðu finnst heilbrigðisbatteríinu / (að vísu er það víst Lyfjastofnun sem virðist ráða því hvað er þýtt um bóluefni )hér á landi engin ástæða til að láta þýða þær upplýsingar og láta almenningi þær í té..
Hvað er verið fela spyr ég þá?
Erum við Íslendingar kanski alltaf að fá einhver önnur bóluefni en aðrar þjóðir?
Það mætti ætla það því þessar upplýsingar eru gefnar öðrum þjóðum af þeirra heilbrigðisstofnunum..en hér haldið frá almenningi..
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 21.4.2016 kl. 16:21 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (1)
24.8.2010 | 14:27
Nýir kvillar sem gætu haldið lyfjafyrirtækjunum gangandi...;-)
http://www.mercola.com/2005/sep/20/new_diseases_that_keep_drug_companies_rolling.htm
Þar sem lyfjafyrirtækin eru stöðugt að búa til ímyndaða sjúkdóma til þess að auka lyfjasölu sína, eins og t.d.
Almenn -hræðslu einkenni...
General Anxiety Disorder (GAD )
(Innskot Agný.Síðan hvenær varð það að kvilla eða sjúkdómseinkenni að finna einhverntíman til hræðslu?
Eða er heimurinn orðinn þvílíka paradisin að þar sé ekkert að óttast?
.Ég myndi frekar kalla „algjört óttaleysi" sjúkdómseinkenni frekar en þetta..
En kanski er erfiðara að búa til lyf við "óttaleysi "en við "hræðslu.."..??
Mike Adams ákvað að grípa aðeins inn til þess að rétta lyfjafyrirtækjunum hjálparhönd með þessari gamansömu grein sem skilgreinir venjulega mannlega hegðun sem sjúkdóma.
En maður er nú farinn að efast verulega um hvað er "mannlegt"...
Kanski það heiti "humanity syndrome" = „Manneskju-legt heilkenni"
„Ísskáps-hurða sjúkdómur"
Refrigerator Door Disease ( RDD )
Lýsing:
Viðkomandi stendur fyrir framan ísskápinn með hurðina opna og starir sviplaust..
( Innskot Agný ..Auðvitað starir maður inn í ísskápinn meðan maður er að finna út hvað maður ætti að fá sér að eta...)
„Tungumála - brenglun"
Language Obfuscation Disorder ( LOD )
Lýsing:
Læknar fá helst þennan kvilla.
. (Innskot Agný.Nota latínu til þess að hljóma gáfulegir.)
Hann veldur því að fórnarlambið bablar og bablar eins og heimskur fjölmiðlamaður....
(Innskot Agný..Þetta er svona merkikerta einkenni að mínu mati..Blaðra á einhverju máli sem enginn skilur..þá lítur viðkomandi út fyrir að vera svo vel gefinn.)
„Sokka-leitar árátta"..
Obsessive Hosiery Dislocation Disorder (OHDD )
Lýsing:
Brálæðisleg leit um allt hús að "hinum" sokknum af hverju sokkapari...
( Innskot Agný..Allar húsmæður hljóta þá að vera með þetta einkenni...merkilegt hvað alltaf týnist af sokkum í þvottinum..alltaf "hinn" sokkurinn.. )
„Viðskifta -kvíða kvilli"..
Commerce Anxiety Disorder (CAD )
Lýsing:
Stöðugur ótti um það hvort kredit kortinu verði synjað af posanum....
(Innskot Agný..Allir íslendingar örugglega með þessa brenglun..Nema kanski seðlabankastjóri..)
„Sjónvarpsrása - flakks árátta"
Repetitive Remote Disorder (RDD ) Lýsing:
Síendurtekið flakk milli sjónvarpsstöðva með fjarstýringunni..
(Innskot Agný. Þetta er meira svona karla kvilli..veit til þess að sumir hafi týnt fjárstýringunni inn í ísskáp..kanski þessi með ísskáps-hurða brenglunina.hehe...)
„Fata-skiftar árátta."
Obsessive Wardrobe Change Disorder. (OWCD)
Lýsing:
Sífelld fataskifti áður en mætt er á fund, skemmtun eða stefnumót.
(Innskot Agný..Þetta hlýtur að vera kvilli þeirra sem eiga fulla skápa af fötum...)
„Þráhyggju-kennd óhlýðni"
Obsessive Disobedience Disorder (ODD )
Lýsing:
Varanlegt vantraust á kennurum, stjórnvöldum, lögmönnum og öðrum yfirmanna fígúrum...
( Innskot Agný. Það var að vísu nýverið fjallað um þetta sem "raunverulegan" sjúkdóm innan geðlækna geirans! ) Ætli þetta megi ekki flokkast sem ótti við Fasistastjórnun.??
„Róta í vösum - röskun"..
Repetitive Pocet Searching Disorder (RPSS)
Lýsing:
Endurtekin leit í öllum vösum að hinum og þessum smáhlutum..
(Innskot Agný..Tel að flestir karlmenn séu þá haldnir þessum "kvilla"..held að vísu að það hafi einhverntíman verið kallað "vasa" billjard..
)
„Sólbaðs -jósa þráhyggja"...
Ultraviolet Light Tanning Disorder (UVLTD)
Lýsing:
Rekur fórnalambið í sí endurtekin ljósaböð.
Annar "raunverulegur"sjúkdómur samkvæmt sumra áliti innan lyfjageirans!
(Innskot Agný. Fyrr á öldum þá var veikt fólk einmitt sent til suðrænna landa í sólina til lækningar...
Þó svo sem margir telji ljósabekki óholla...þá ég tel allt draslið sem fólk á að smyrja á sig óhollara því það er allt stútfullt af kemískum efnum sem er bannað að nota nema í snyrtivörum og sólkremum..og ansi mörg ef ekki öll eru þau krabbameinsvaldandi..
Kanski þessvegna sem húðkrabbi sé, en ekki vegna sólar ljóss eða útfjólblás..fínt að smyrja sig olíu og feiti og liggja svo og láta gumsið „sjóða „ á húðinni svona eins og þegar maður hefur ofhitað smjörlíki á pönnu og það verður ógeðslega svarbrúnt...
Skyldi þetta vera að orsaka brúna litin?
Sól"varnar "áburðurinn brunninn af hita sólarinnar og kraumar og sýður á þér.....)
„Umferðaljósa- eftirvæntingar kvilli.."
Traffic Light Anticipation Disorder (TLAD)
Lýsing:
Þeir sem halda að rautt ljós gefi í skyn að ökumaðurinn eigi að leyfa ökutækinu að læðast áfram að gatnamótunum, einhverskonar grænt ljós, en bara í „slow motion".
(Innskot Agný..Þetta gæti verið sjúkdómur sem gæfi lyfjafyrirtækjunum vel í aðra hönd..Allir "sýktir" af þessum sjúkdómi..)
Þýðandi Agný.
Hér er upptalningin, en ég efast ekki um að það sé hægt að fjölga sjúkdómum / einkennum fyrir vesalings fátæku lyfjafyrirtækin..
VIÐBÓT FRÁ AGNÝ..
Annars er ég að hugsa um að fara að titla mig sem þetta:
Specialist in a " kind of " a syndrome.. "
Sérfræðingur í "nokkurs konar " heilkennum.. ætli það flokkist ekki sem"ódæmigerður" sjúkdómur..
Hugsa að ég gæti bara þénað nokkuð vel á því...
„Einhverju" sem meðhönldar þá sem eru með „eitthvað" heilkenni ég fengi sko örugglega nóg að gera...
Svo má alltaf bæta við þessum „ódæmigerðu" sjúkdómum eða „afbrigðum" af sjúkdómum..."óljósum" sjúkdómum, „einkennalausum " veikindum..
En ekki síst þessu hér:
"Sjúkdóms-greiningar þráhyggja"
Disease diagnostic obsession
Þetta er mjög svo áberandi þráhyggja í dag virðist mér innan heilbriðgðisgeirans..
Allir þurfa að vera "greindir" eitthvað ..Einu sinni var nóg að vera bara "greindur "=gáfaður...
Í gamla daga hét það "ástríða" (passion) sem heitir í dag "þráhyggja" (obsession)
Það sem hét að vera "sorgmæddur" heitir í dag "depurð"
En það er víst ekki eins auðvelt að skrifa upp á lyf við "ástríðu" ...þannig að það er auðveldara ef að "barnið " heitir "þráhyggja"..
Heldur erfitt að skrifa upp á lyf við því að vera " sorgmæddur"....
"Depurð " hljómar svo miklu meira vísindalegt...
*************************************************************
Ég, Agný bætti þessu við núna þann 24 ágúst 2010...
Hér er að vísu viðbót sem ég set núna...en það er nú
reyndar farið að greina/skil/greina börn með "ódæmigerða" einhverfu!!
Er ekki í lagi með þetta lið!!
..Hvað ætli manneskja, þá á ég við fullorðna sem er komin með það mikla íslensku kunnáttu að hún skilji hvað ódæmigert þýði, segði ef hún fengi þessa sjúkdómsgreiningu:
,, Þú ert með "ódæmigerða " sykursýki..... Eða...
,,Þú ert með"ódæmigert "krabbamein....
Þú ert með "ódæmigerða " lifrarbólgu B....,,
Barnið þitt er með "ódæmigerða "heilahimnubólgu"...
Hvað finnst ykkur lesendur góðir um svona "sjúkdóms"greiningar?
EÐA EIGUM VIÐ AÐ KALLA ÞAÐ "SJÚKDÓMS" VÆÐINGU?
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 6.1.2011 kl. 04:55 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
ÞAÐ ER BÚIÐ AÐ GERA ALLAR SLÓÐIR SEM ÉG SETTI HÉR INN FYRIR 11 ÁRUM ÓVIRKAR!
EN SORRY FYRIR ÞÁ SEM FJARLÆGÐU ÞÆR, ÞÁ FANN ÉG ÞÆR AFTUR EFTIR LEIT Á VISSUM STAÐ..
ÞETTA HÉR UNDIR ER SLÓÐ INN Á SÍÐUNA:
https://www.overlordsofchaos.com/
https://www.overlordsofchaos.com/index.php/videos
ÞETTA ER SLÓÐ INN Á : (það er búið að taka þessa slóð niður. Núna er 2024 Mars...)
Unfortunately for the people of the world everything is going according to the New World Order Plan. But what is this New World Order Plan?
In a nutshell "The Plan" is this: The Secret Planners of the New World Order's Evil Agenda intend to reduce the world's population to a "sustainable" level "in perpetual balance with nature" by a ruthless Population Control Agenda via Reproduction Control and Genocide.
A Mass Culling of the People in a Planned Genocide via toxic adulteration of water and food supplies, weaponised microwave radiation, weaponised Chemtrails, release of weaponised man-made viruses, man-made pandemics, mass vaccination campaigns, civil and race wars culminating in the planned Third World War.
Then, the Dark Agenda will impose upon the drastically reduced world population a Global Feudal-Fascist State - the World Technate - with a World Government, World Religion, World Army, World Central Bank, World Currency and a micro-chipped population.
In short, to kill 90% of the world's population and to control all aspects of the human condition and rule everyone, everywhere from the cradle to the grave.
The COVID-19 Plannedemic has fundamentally changed the world: is there any doubt that the world - as you once knew it - no longer exists?
The Great War for Human Freedom has begun.
Gentle reader, understand, we live in truly perilous times, the Darkest Period in Human History is upon us.
In this sense, should be viewed as a genuine revelation of the plot to enslave mankind and enthrone an "aristocracy based on wealth" whose spiritual and temporal capital will be Jerusalem and whose spiritual source is the malefic spirit of immense power often called Satan but who is also called Ahriman. An ancient dream described in the words of the unknown author of the Protocols:
"We shall set up a super government that shall subdue all the nations of the world."
The plot has been unfolding for centuries before the Eye of History and can be seen today in the relentless destruction of, in the words of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, "all collective forces except ours." These "collective forces" are all things that underpin human existence and give society cohesion and individuals' identity, meaning and purpose but, especially, the concepts of Race, Religion, Nation and Family, all of which are products of Natural Moral Order.
It is this Natural Moral Order, brought about in its entirety by the Will of God, which is the true target of the Dark Powers acting on Earth at whose head seat enthrone two spirits of immense power that are the Dark Gods, Ahriman, and Lucifer, who are verily the two faces of Evil.
Although there is a definite spiritual awakening occurring on Earth, and more and more people are becoming aware that something is not quite right with things, it is a depressing fact that the majority of humanity are wholly ignorant of the dire predicament they are in.
That they are hopelessly enslaved in a material existence that is largely controlled by Secret Masters and that key to this enslavement is their dependence upon, and blind obedience to, the mode rn financial system.
Fundamental to the control of the modern financial system is the Central Banks and the few conjoined, intermarried families who own them, and pre-eminent among these are Rothschild and Rockefeller: respectively the European and North American foci of the Great Conspiracy. Whose exoteric organization and activities are often referred to as the Anglo-American Establishment.
The bankers and corporations associated with the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are part of the vanguard of the Great Conspiracy, representing a sort of corporate aristocracy, but they are not its leaders … this great power lies elsewhere; and those who hold it are verily the Lords of Power and are, in the temporal sense, truly the Masters of our Destiny.
This lesser power - the Corporate Aristocracy – often called the Anglo-American Establishment - have controlled Western Governments, the media, and education for more than a century.
Freemasonry, Communism, Socialism, Liberalism, Zionism, Neo-Conservativism, Feminism, the Homosexual Agenda, Multiculturalism and more are all their instruments of control since the attack on Natural Moral Order is perforce all-encompassing and acts on all levels of human existence.
ÞETTA HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN PÓSTAÐI ÉG 2010
-SEM SÉ FYRIR 10 ÁRUM OG OG ÞAÐ VIRÐIST ALLT VERA AÐ GANGA EFTIR SEM ÞETTA Z-ELÍTA PLANAÐI FYRIR MÖRG HUNDRUÐ ÁRUM!
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html
"Economic crises have been produced by us for the goyim by no other means than the withdrawal of money from circulation ... it is indispensable to trouble in all countries the people's relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension, hatred, struggle, envy, torture, starvation,
BY THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES,
by want, so that the goyim will see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else"
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/protocols__1_to_10.html#PROTOCOL10
from the much misunderstood and routinely maligned document called
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro.html
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, husband of Elizabeth II, quoted in foreword to Fleur Cowles,
If I Were an Animal (1987).
"The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day ... It's terrible to have to say this.
World Population must be stabilized and to do that we have to eliminate 350,000 people per day.
In one year that would equal 128 million people."
Jacques-Yves Cousteau (1910-97)
French oceanographer, filmmaker and environmentalist revealing the misanthropic nature of the UN and the radical environmentalist movement:
"Interview Jacques-Yves Cousteau,"
The UNESCO Courier, (1991)
"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner,
CNN founder, Globalist and NWO insider quoted in
The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June (1996)
Gentle reader, understand, there is no "theory" involved when elucidating the complexity of arrangement, sweeping scope and incredible evil that is the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#RothkopfSuperclass
plan for World Government often called
the New World Order.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
The New World Order Agenda for World Government is not Conspiracy Theory but Conspiracy Fact.
Thus, any proper analysis of the New World Order Agenda for World Government is the analysis of an agenda, an Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government.
Hence, those who understand the true nature of the New World Order Agenda are not Conspiracy Theorists but Agenda Analysts.
The New World Order Agenda for World Governmenthas existed for millennia.Its main vehicle of transmission is
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1800-49.html#_NewmanconfediracyofEvildestroyingChurch
which has been called many things throughout the ages but is verily the Cult of Evil.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy___secret.html
Today the name Illuminati
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1935-39.html#AliceBaileyIlluminati
applies to parts of this ancient, evil cult. Generations of countless co-conspirators and numerous organisations carry forward the
Cult of Evil's
Ancient Hope for World Government
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy___secret.html
but inter-generational Luciferians and Satanists of the highest degree orchestrate it.
These Dark Adepts are the Secret Mastersof the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government often called the New World Order and whose power base is the
Dark Empire of Secret Societies.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__nature_and_f.html
Their Will
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/glossary_s_to_z.html#Will-to-Power
is projected throughout society and across the world via
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/freemasonry_3.html#DarkFreemasonry
and its countless front groups especially the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#Trilateral Commission
and the Council for Foreign Relations.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009.html#ObamaCFRansdTCmembers
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
is truly massive and beyond the ken of most people even those who profess expertise in it and make a good living from their books,tours and seminars "exposing" it.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2004.html#RoveSecretSocietiescreate own reality
is a tangled mass of interwoven threads with countless goals and myriad sub-agendas such that it is truly a Gordian-knot. Moreover, an intricate and tight knot very few have untangled.
They have failed not only because of the intricate nature of the task but also because they fail to understand that it is ultimately a religious agenda.
That is, they fail miserably to understand that what energises the
New World Order Agenda is not simple power-cravings but a deep spiritual impulse.
They do not understand that Dark Spiritual Forces energise the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_world_order_plan_to_milita.html
and those who are party to it.
They do not understand that Organised Evil on Earth is the organising brain of the New World Order Agenda and its acolytes are the true inheritors of the Ancient Evil Agenda for World Government.
Those who understand the
New World Order Agenda
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/new_order_of_barbarians.html
know that mankind is in the malignant grip of a
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__nature_and_f.html
the Ancient Cult of Evil.
They know that this secret cabal of inter-generational occultists serve
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/nature_of_evil.html
and work to bring about its ambition to usurp God's Rule on Earth.
They understand that the Ancient Evil Agenda is the five thousand
year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government, which many identify
as the New World Order Agenda.
They know that the unfolding agenda has involved millions of co-conspirators throughout history all linked by their worship and servitude to Evil.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/secret_societies__serious_obje.html
has worked ceaselessly to bring about conditions on Earth that have secured and advanced its cause.
They know that Evil has amplified its presence and influence on Earth such that now as the final phase of its agenda unfolds, it has (and largely unseen by the masses) control of the world by invisibly controlling government, the media, education and business.
Moreover, they understand that Organised Evil wants to establish their control on Earth totally, absolutely and forever.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that those behind
it must break humanity; they must break us, each and every one of us.
They know that they have to destroy America,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_9.html#USAmustbeDestroyed
the West and so Western Christian Civilisation itself as well as destroying every vestige of humanity's individuality, uniqueness,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1970-74.html#Piercekidsnustbeworldcitizens
and independent thought.
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1970-74.html
Thus, those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that it is, in truth, Organised Evil's battle plan in its Total War with humanity and so, ultimately, its earthly strategy in its Cosmic War with God and Christ.
Those who understand the New World Order Agenda know that the Political Class of the world, the majority of which are in bondage tot he Dark Power, to
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/freemasonry_3.html#DarkFreemasonry
have abandoned the people to their fate.
They know that the Political Class is in total thrall of
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_.html
and is merely a tool by which the New World Order Agenda is being completed.
They know that in its Total War with humanity one of Organised Evil's greatest weapons is control of the economy and why it now seeks to destroy it;
in preparation for the
New International Economic Order
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/planned_takedown_of_financial_.html
itself merely a stepping stone to Lucifer's One
World Government and Ahriman's One World Religion.
And, all those who truly understand the way of the world, who understand the New World Order Agenda, know this ...
They know that Organised Evil is the true architects of the New World Order Agenda and that verily Lucifer and Ahriman-Satan are the gods of this Evil Age (Matt. 4:8-9).
In addition, gentle reader, those who understand the New World Order Agenda also know intrinsic to it is a great and
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2006.html#Pianka
that demands the destruction of the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
of the world population to at least
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
This is Organised Evil's Planned Takedown of the World Population in which they intend the mass murder of millions by, in the words of the Demon speaking through the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro4.html#PiketrueVoiceofEvil
of the much misunderstood and routinely maligned document called
The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,
"THE INOCULATION OF DISEASES."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati_conspiracy__the_pro.html
VIRUSES,BACTERIA, TRANSMISSIBILITY, VIRULENCE, EPIDEMICS & PANDEMICS |
There are three main classifications of contamination that threaten human life: microorganisms (living creatures); chemicals (which may be organic or inorganic in nature but are not alive) and Radioactivity (energy radiated or transmitted in the form of rays, waves or particles).
The Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
and its minions in governments, in the UN, the WHO and the myriad organisations,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1955-59.html#WormserFounationspowerinfluence
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1950-54.html#CFRresponsibleforpoliciesinimmicaltoUS
NGOs etc. that comprise the nascent New World Order, use all three classes,
as well as other more esoteric classes of contamination,
In its Total War with humanity, the New World Order crowd use two main strategies (together with their attendant weaponry) to cull humanity: the Soft Kill and the Hard Kill. the Hard Killing of humanity are violent,overt forms of death usually carried out in times of war, revolution and crises.
All modern, major phases of the Hard Killing of humanity are invariably created by the Illuminati and its
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/protocols__1_to_10.html#Agentur
for example, the French Revolution, the American Civil War, the Boar War,
the First and Second World Wars,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/islam_8.html#WW1WW2
the Korean and Vietnam Wars and, of course, the two Gulf Wars.
The planned Third World War
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_at_war_1.html
is intended to dwarf all these created conflicts in intensity, destruction and casualties such that the case for World Peace via World Government is beyond criticism.
Food adulteration and its contamination with toxic chemicals and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are softly killing humans.
Bio-weapons in the form of bio-engineered viruses and toxic, weaponised vaccinations are other suburb methods of
Soft Kill.
A Virus is the smallest of the organic hazards and range in size from 0.3 microns to 0.01 microns (a micron is one thousandth of a millimetre or one millionth of a metre). A virus is a simple organism being a piece of nucleic acid wrapped in a coat of protein.
It is not a fully formed cell and can only reproduce and grow by infecting a host where it inserts its nucleic acid (its RNA) into host cells.
In other words, a virus cannot grow or reproduce apart from a living cell.
Bacteria are single-celled organisms (prokaryotes) with a complete set of nucleic acid (RNA and DNA) and are much larger than viruses (0.5 microns to 5 microns and so up to 100 times bigger than a virus).
The majority of bacteria (90%) are harmless or beneficial to humans while some are dangerous e.g. Cholera and Typhoid
An Epidemic describes the widespread outbreak of an infectious disease with many people infected at the same time. Thus, it describes the situation when the number of cases of a particular disease exceeds the number that would normally be expected.
Epidemics of infectious disease can escalate into Pandemics, but do not always do so. A pandemic is an outbreak of a new infectious disease, which causes serious illness and spreads widely from person to person across more than one geographical region.
Two factors determine the course of an infectious disease: the rate of spread and the degree of danger of a virus: that is, its transmissibility and its virulence. The first determines the speed a virus spreads and the number of people will become infected. The latter determines how many people who are infected fall seriously ill or die.
Transmissibility is defined as the average number of people that each person with the virus will infect. This is the reproduction number, sometimes known as "R." If "R" is greater than one the virus is deemed to be spreading; if it is below one, then it is deemed to be petering out.
Many factors and variables determine the reproduction number and so the Transmissibility of a virus. Such as the biology of the virus, the level of immunity in the population, containment measures such as isolation, school closures and travel restrictions; moreover, especially, but not in the way the so-called "experts" declare or what the ignorant majority believe, is the use of antiviral treatments and vaccines.
The key measure of Virulence is the case fatality rate, that is, the proportion of infected people who die. To establish the case fatality rate for a pandemic one needs to know the total number of infections as well as the total number of deaths.
Thus, for example, the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918-19, the case fatality rate was about 2.5 per cent, while for the 1968 pandemic it was below 0.5 per cent. This explains the huge difference in the death tolls experienced at these times.
However, even a low case fatality rate would still be dangerous if the virus spreads widely. If 40 per cent of the population became infected with Swine Flu Virus, as the worst-case scenarios suggest and with a low case fatality rate of 0.1 per cent, there could be millions of deaths: as many as 240,000 deaths in the UK and 1.3 million in the USA.
|
A Virus is a micro-organism smaller than a bacteria, which cannot grow or reproduce apart from a living cell. A virus is thus a sort of parasite that invades living cells and uses their chemical machinery to keep itself alive and to replicate itself.
It may reproduce without error or with errors. If a virus reproduces itself with errors, a sort of bad photocopy of itself, then it is said to mutate. This ability to mutate is the reason why viruses are often difficult to treat since any mutation makes the virus slightly different in each infected person. Moreover, the rate of mutation differs in each virus species and obviously those that mutate the fastest are the most difficult to fight.
Infection is a growth of a parasitic organism within the body. A parasitic organism, a "germ" such as a virus, bacteria or yeast, is one that lives on or in another organism and draws its nourishment from it. .
Viral Infection is caused by the presence of a virus in the body and, depending on the virus and the person's state of health, various viruses can infect almost any type of body tissue and organ, from the brain to the skin. Antibiotics are useless against viral infections; indeed, in some cases the use of antibiotics makes the viral infection worse.
The body's own immune system can take care of the vast majority of human viral infections, with a little help in the form of proper diet, hydration, and rest, without recourse to drugs or other treatments. Depending on the type and location of the virus, attacks that are more virulent are treated with anti-viral or other drugs.
Seasonal Influenza, "the flu," is caused by viruses that infect the respiratory tract and are divided into three types, designated A, B, and C. Most people who get the flu recover completely in 1 to 2 weeks.
Nevertheless, some people (usually suffering underlying health problems and/or decrepitude) develop serious and potentially life-threatening medical complications, such as pneumonia.
The Medical Cartel Big Pharma,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html
the Medical Establishment and corrupt government structures) peddle the myth that much of the illness and death caused by influenza can be prevented by annual influenza vaccination.
Vaccines are "Immunogens" or "immunizing agents," which are substances or organisms that provokes an immune response (produces immunity) when introduced into the body. Invariably they consisting of a suspension of weakened or dead pathogenic cells (i.e. attenuated so as to lose its virulence but which carry antigens.) injected into the body in order to stimulate the production of antibodies (the large variety of proteins normally present in the body or produced in response to an antigen (toxin or enzyme) which it neutralises, thus producing an "immune response."
Immunisation against viral diseases invariably requires the virus used in the vaccine to be attenuated i.e. weakened or killed. Immunisation against bacterial diseases usually requires the use a small portion of the dead bacteria to stimulate the formation of antibodies against the whole bacteria.
Immunity is thus the condition of being immune, which can be innate (e.g. humans are innately immune to canine distemper) or conferred by a previous infection or immunisation.
In short: Vaccines are weakened or killed pathogens deliberately injected into the healthy body to produce a response in the body and hopefully the production of antibodies to counter the attenuated pathogens such that it will prevent future infection with similar but more virulent pathogens thereby preventing disease and/or death. Thus, vaccination is the term used to describe the use of vaccines to prevent specific diseases.
Vaccination is thus the injection into a healthy body of a killed microbe in order to stimulate the immune system against the "live" microbe. The theory is that vaccinations, or immunisations, work by stimulating the immune system, the natural disease-fighting system of the body. In addition, since the healthy immune system is able to recognise invading pathogens (bacteria and viruses) it produces substances (antibodies) to destroy or disable them.
In other words, immunisations is supposed to prepare the immune system to ward off a disease. Moreover, Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma peddle the myth that periodic repeat injections or "boosters" can improve the effectiveness of immunisations.
Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma know that any and all criticisms of vaccines should be vilified and ruthlessly suppressed because they know that otherwise the public might refuse to take them.
A situation made worse when the known risks of the vaccines far outweigh the dubious benefits and that this passes into common knowledge such that the public understand vaccines do more harm than good.
VACCINES DO NOT PREVENT DISEASE
" … the only safe vaccine is one that is never used."
Dr James R Shannon, former director of the US National Institute of Health.
The Medical Cartel Big Pharma,
the Medical Establishment and corrupt government structures) are master propagandists.
They are especially adept at convincing the public that Edward Jenner's discovery of vaccines transformed the world for the good.
That it single-handedly eradicated or made less devastating many debilitating diseases such as polio and smallpox. Moreover, that vaccines have changed how these diseases affect humanity, that they give protection from once global killers and so removed the constant worry of the parent that their child might be struck down early in life by smallpox or crippled by polio or damaged by a vicious strain of mumps, measles or rubella.
This may be great propaganda and excellent sales-pitch for vaccines but it is not the truth of the matter.
Adjunct to the Establishment's propaganda is
"Myths in Immunisation."
Here the Masters of Illusion
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1925-29.html#BernaysPropgandamouildingminds
tell us that Myths in Immunisation are as old as immunisation itself.
That even in the beginning, when Edward Jenner first developed his smallpox vaccine in 1796, the public was concerned that material from cowpox sores was used and directly injected into people causing strange responses.
Hence cartoonists of the age drew children growing cattle horns and while the early tabloid press give breathless accounts of extraordinary side effects:
"A child ran upon on all fours like a beast, bellowing like a cow, and butting with its head like a bull."
The master propagandists behind the New World Order Agenda, the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1925-29.html#BernaysPropgandamouildingminds
tell us that the rapid pace of vaccine development has been paralleled by a whole new generation of "Immunisation Myths." Myths that confuse the issue and lead the public, especially concerned parents, to think vaccines are bad and so do not vaccinate their children.
Where ignorance exists, say these authoritarian elitist, myths flourish. And unfortunately there is great ignorance on Immunisation even among those who give vaccines.
Thus, "Immunisation Myths" will endure and children put at risk so long as the public remain in ignorance of the true value and great benefits of vaccines.
Such is the persuasive nature of the propaganda spewed out of the mouths and from the pens of those who seek to destroy the viability of humanity by destroying the immune systems of individuals through vaccines and mass immunisation programmes.
The Invisible Money Power controls the world by control of every and all structures of power: and so controls Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma.
The Invisible Money Power, the Synagogue of Satan,
the Global Elite,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2000-02.html#RockefelleradmitsNWO
the Illuminati,
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/illuminati.html
call it what you will for it is the very same Beast, wants to set up a New World Order with a compliant, servile slave population.
Moreover, set up Lucifer and Ahriman's Global Kingdom with a population ideally
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
And one of the means they are using to do this is by controlling medicine, medical science and the production of drugs, their dissemination and use.
In other words, they now control the health of humanity and are busy destroying it by the ubiquitous use of allopathic drugs in general healthcare treatments and toxic, lethal vaccines used in mass immunisation programmes.
The Dark Powers and its Workers of Darkness are busily destroying the genetic make-up of mankind, busily introducing cancer-inducing agents into the individual and busily compromising the immune systems of all those foolish and trusting enough to take Big Pharma's toxic, lethal vaccines.
Reader, understand, vaccines do not work and have never worked the way their makers have said they did.
The living conditions in the Western World during the Industrial Revolution (the great transformation of Europe and North America from agricultural to industrial nations beginning in the early 18th century) where, for the most part and for the majority of people, horrendous.
Squalor and poor public health and hygiene resulted in massive mortality rates with the average age of death being 27. Poor sanitation compounded by polluted water supplies took their toll on the masses huddled in their squalid dwellings.
It was during this time of great change, urbanisation and industrialisation that the theory and practice of vaccination developed. Moreover, a time when the importance of public hygiene and unpolluted water supplies became evident to good health and when the city authorities began to do something about them.
With the provision of potable, safe public water supplies and the understanding and practice of public hygiene coupled with more sanitary private dwellings, the mortality rates began to tumble and people lived longer. This resulted in the explosion of population in the 19th century that seeded the expansion of the European empires around the world. Thus, as the theory and practice of vaccination and immunisation developed it was accompanied by the significant developments in public and private hygiene.
If careful study of both phenomenon is carried out (the theory and practice of vaccination and the theory and practice of public hygiene and health) then one is led to a startling conclusion. Much of the success attributed to vaccination programmes
(from which the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma make great propaganda)was due entirely to the great improvement in public health and hygiene.
Especially the great improvements in public water supply quality, in sanitation, in less crowded living conditions, in better nutrition, and in increasingly higher standards of living.
Throughout the industrialising and increasingly urbanised Western World, the incidences of a disease and mortality rates were in decline; but it is especially clear that the incidents of disease was clearly in decline before the vaccine for that disease was introduced. Thus, for example, in Great Britain, the incidence of polio had decreased by 82% before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956.
In other words, vaccines were not the great saviours of society but incidental to the true causes i.e. good public health and individual longevity: greatly improved public water supply quality and sanitation combined with better quality dwellings, less crowded living conditions, better nutrition and increasingly higher standards of living. These factors were responsible for the spectacular turnaround in demographic trends not vaccines.
There is, in fact, compelling evidence that not only did vaccines not help in improving public health and individual mortality but that they do not actually work. That is, vaccines do not prevent diseases.
An example: Edward Jenner (1749-1823) is the English physician who is recognised as the pioneer of vaccination who inoculated people with small amounts of cowpox to prevent them from getting smallpox.
Cowpox is the viral disease of cattle causing a mild skin disease affecting the udder and Jenner supposedly noticed that milkmaids seemed immune to smallpox and reasoned that their exposure to the cowpox somehow made them impervious to the much more dangerous smallpox.
He thus scraped the cowpox pus from infected cow udders and injected it into healthy people, with supposed positive health results. That is, in 1796 he developed his vaccine that he said had produced immunity to smallpox.
Soon it was believed that the Cowpox vaccine was able to immunise people against smallpox. However, at the time the Cowpox vaccine was introduced, there was already a decline in Western Europe in the number of cases of Smallpox. In 1867, Great Britain carried out a draconian and compulsory Smallpox vaccine programme and those refusing the vaccine were prosecuted. Within 4 years, it is estimated that 97.5 % of Britons between 2 and 50 had been vaccinated. Yet, the following year, Britain experienced the worst recorded smallpox epidemic in its history with 44,840 deaths. Moreover, in the period 1871-80 the incidence of smallpox in Britain escalated from 28 to 46 per 100,000.
Another example is Japan, which introduced compulsory vaccination in 1872 and yet in 1892 there were 165,774 cases of smallpox with 29,979 deaths despite the vaccination programme.
Hence the conclusion: The smallpox vaccine does not work.
The devastating conclusion is that vaccines do not work and that there is overwhelming evidence that vaccines are dangerous. What is more, they are never studied for safety before their general use.
So why are they used?
The uninformed will quickly say that the only reason for their existence is to increase the profits of pharmaceutical firms.
The more informed would agree but would add that profits alone are not the true purpose of vaccines, rather, that those who profit from them know what damage they do and are developing even more potent ways of increasing this damage.
Because the Dark Powers controlling Governments,
the Medical Establishment and BigPharma have an
Eugenic Population Control Agenda
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
and vaccines and their universal use are intrinsic to it.
The Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008__2_.html#Bilderberger Conference Attendees
behind the Eugenic Population Control Agenda do not publicise their aims, it is not discussed in their propaganda media organs and TV, for instance.
However, it is scattered about in the musings, writings and policy documents of the New World Order's numerous mouthpieces and front groups.
Thus, for example, the influential
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/ufo_agenda_17.html#club_rome
position paper in which they state that the world population is too large and needs to be reduced by 90%,
or Ted Turner and Jacques Cousteau's
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
comments in agreement, and the so-called
American Stonehenge in which it is carved in stone.
They all, and many others, agree that the present population of 6 billion people is far too many for
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/craftmasonry.html#Great_Mother_Goddess
to support and is "unsustainable" and must be reduced to at least 500 to 600 million
"in constant balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1990-94.html#CousteauExterrminationMAN
|
Vaccines do not prevent diseases. This fact is easily demonstrated by the numerous cases of vaccine failures. That is, when disease outbreaks occur in populations that have been thoroughly vaccinated. Some examples should suffice to illustrate the phenomenon of vaccine failure.
Diphtheria is the acute contagious infection caused by the bacterium Corynebacterium diphtheria and is marked by the formation of a false membrane in the throat and other air passages causing difficulty in breathing. England and Wales instituted diphtheria vaccination in 1894 causing the number of deaths from diphtheria to rise by 20 % in the subsequent 15 years.
In Germany, Adolf Hitler instituted compulsory vaccination in 1939 after which the rate of diphtheria rocketed to 150,000 cases that year. However, in Norway, which did not have compulsory vaccination, only 50 cases of diphtheria were reported in the same year.
Measles is the acute and highly contagious viral disease marked by distinct red spots followed by a rash and occurs primarily in children. Epidemiology (branch of medical science dealing with the transmission and control of disease) shows that measles mortality rates had declined by 97% in Britain before measles vaccination was instituted in schools.
Also, outbreaks often occur in schools with high vaccination rates (over 98 %) including areas that had reported no cases of measles for years. There are also reported outbreaks of measles occurring in schools where 100 % of the children had been vaccinated. In other words, not only does it not do what it is supposed to do and stop measles but also, with high measles immunisation rates, it causes the outbreak of the disease only in vaccinated persons. That is, the measles vaccine causes measles in healthy populations.
Whooping Cough (pertussis: A disease of the respiratory mucous membrane) was a disease routinely given by Western governments to its children. In 1975, Germany stopped compulsory vaccination such that now less than 10 % of German children are vaccinated against Whooping Cough.
Yet, the number of cases of Whooping Cough has steadily decreased even though far fewer German children are receiving the Whooping Cough vaccine.
In the Netherlands, where for more than 20 years 96 % of babies have received three pertussis shots in their first year of life, Whooping Cough remains endemic. In 1986, there were 1300 cases of Whooping Cough in Kansas and 90 % of these cases occurred in children who had been adequately vaccinated.
Similarly, epidemiological records show vaccine failure in Nova Scotia where Whooping Cough continues to be occurring despite universal vaccination.
This proves among other things that immunity is more complex than in the theory of vaccination promulgated by Governments, the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma. It illustrates that there is a fundamental difference between life-long immunity from natural infection and that supposedly given by vaccines. It shows that simply injecting attenuated pathogens and other dubious substances directly into the bloodstream does not bestow longevity and good health.
It clearly demonstrates the great flaw in the injection process (injecting viral and other toxic particles directly into the blood):
that once these toxins have been introduced into the body there is no adequate way to eliminate these foreign substances.
To create real immunity a full inflammatory response from the body is necessary. The body's immune system must be fully taxed by the pathogen to give future immunity to it. This does not occur when attenuated pathogens are introduced into the body via vaccines.
Before the introduction of measles and mumps vaccines children got measles and mumps and in the great majority of cases these diseases were benign since the immune systems easily handled the invasion. Vaccines drenched in attenuated pathogens (e.g. measles and mumps) indeed trigger an immune response but also "trick" the body so it does not mount a complete inflammatory response to the injected virus. The corollary of this is that vaccines are not only superfluous to good health, longevity and life-long immunity but that they actually compromise all three. In other words, vaccines are bad for human health.
VACCINE LABS UNSAFE AND UNCLEAN
The Medical Cartel (the Medical Establishment and Big Pharma) promotes the idea that vaccine laboratories and manufacturing facilities are some of the cleanest and antiseptic places in the world. The truth is they are not and contamination occurs all the time.
Thus, purity and cross-contamination are major issues since all sorts of debris are introduced into vaccines.
For example, the "SV40 monkey virus" that found its way into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys.
The "SV40 monkey virus" was later found in cancer tumours in humans and so those who "took the shot" were infected with the monkey virus, which contributed to their cancer.
In other words, the use of monkey kidneys to make the polio vaccine opened the door to a strange, foreign germ from a different species to infect the human body. The corollary is thus that by using a variety of species to manufacture various vaccines in facilities suffering from defective protocols and procedures will inevitably introduce foreign germs into the vaccines, which will cause perturbations to the human immune system.
The actual lab conditions, the mistakes and careless errors -the human error factor- are endemic to the manufacturing process. Thus, contamination of vaccines is a structural problem that cannot be eradicated. Consequently, it is an accepted part of the vaccine manufacturing process and vaccine makers know that different types of contaminants deleterious to human health are part of their vaccines.
Put differently, contaminants that are very dangerous to human health that should not be in the vaccines are in the vaccines due to unavoidable "mistakes" and are introduced directly into an individual's bloodstream, by-passing their normal immune defences, when they "take the shot."
For example, various chicken viruses in the Rimavex measles vaccine; Acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba, and Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine; Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine; Bird-cancer viruses and Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine; Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine; Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine as well as dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines.
These are all contaminants that should not belong in the vaccines but are because of poor protocols and human error.
Some vaccines, such as some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella, Hep A and measles, are made with aborted human foetal tissue. The morality of this notwithstanding, these vaccines are also contaminated with elements from the foetal tissue, such as bacterial fragments and poliovirus.
Animal tissues from various species are routinely used in vaccine manufacture, which is the main source of "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Other toxic, carcinogenic materials are also purposely put into vaccines such as chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminium.
The basic premise about vaccines is founded upon
faulty grounds.
This states that vaccines are wonderful medicines because they are safe and work wonderfully well. It further states that vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. A vaccine does this by "creating" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. It is a simple premise but one that does not stand up to scrutiny.
The human immune system is much more sophisticated than the one presented in the Medical Cartel's paradigm. It is more complex, larger and more involved than simply antibodies and their related "killer cells."
The human immune system is the entire body, including the mind. That is why in the middle of a pandemic many individuals remain healthy because their level of general health is good and so their immune system is strong.
Thus, vaccine contamination by biological contaminants such as "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses" is unavoidable many of them also remain undiscovered. Using animal tissue invariably means using material contaminated with "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Moreover, the exact number and nature of them is unknown. Thus, vaccine manufacturers do not know what or how many contaminants are in their animal tissues.
They have no idea how many possible germs are in these animal tissues and so no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans when introduced directly into the bloodstream and by-passing normal immune defences. Furthermore, many biological contaminants remain undiscovered because researchers and quality control do not to look for them.
Consequently, no attempt to calculate or quantify the damage caused by these contaminants is undertaken. No or very little testing is done and so no degree of risk in "taking the shot" is carried out.
In short, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way according to the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/humanist_agenda__when_man_beco4.html#Scientific_Method_
Taking the vaccine shot is like taking part in Russian Roulette. You take the chance that your "shot" will not hurt or kill you by giving you the disease it is intended to protect you from, or by inducing a massive allergic reaction or by giving you a contaminant that produces delayed reactions like cancer.
Many toxic elements are present in vaccines. They are there primarily due to human error and poor procedure.
However, some are there by design and euphemistically called "adjuvants."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob2.html#vaccine_toxic_lethal_cocktails
That is, put in by their makers to perturb and disrupt the human immune system. That is why vaccines are the true weapons of mass destruction in the Soft Kill phase of the Power Elite's Total War with humanity.
Many toxic elements are found in vaccines and some of them are very difficult to identify.
These are the "foreign proteins," which could mean almost anything.
It could mean protein from foreign viruses that should only be found in the animals it was designed by God to infect.
"Foreign proteins" and other toxic, lethal materials injected directly into the bloodstream without passing through the ordinary human immune defences.
Animal tissues from various species are routinely used in vaccine manufacture, which is the main source of "foreign proteins" and "foreign viruses."
Other toxic, carcinogenic materials are also purposely put into vaccines such as chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminium.The basic theory of vaccines is founded upon faulty grounds, especially two false premisses.
First, the premiss that vaccines are wonderful medicines because they are safe and work wonderfully well.
Second, the premiss that vaccines work by stimulating the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. A vaccine does this by "creating" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. It is a simple premise but one that does not stand up to scrutiny.
The human immune system is much more sophisticated than the one presented in the Medical Cartel's paradigm. It is more complex, larger and more involved than simply antibodies and their related "killer cells." The human immune system is the entire body, including the mind. That is why in the middle of a pandemic many individuals remain healthy because their level of general health is good and so their immune system is strong.
VACCINE STATISTICS FALSELY PRESENTED
Vaccine statistics are routinely misrepresented to support the Medical Cartel's paradigm and to conceal the real and dangerous nature of inoculation. A favourite trick is conceal vaccine failure by misdiagnosis and calling a disease something else. For example, people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine and yet still come down with hepatitis.
Since, hep B is a liver disease it can by diagnosed as other things, the doctor or statistician can change the diagnosis, thus, concealing the root cause of the problem. This is greatly helped by ignorant and trusting doctors who believe the propaganda of their profession.
Doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines do not come down with the diseases they are supposed to be protected from. Hence, if a person who is vaccinated against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the doctor's automatic assumption is it had nothing to do with the disease and that the vaccine has done its job.
In short, the Medical Profession is a closed system and admits no fault; especially in regard to vaccines.
VACCINES NOT TESTED IN SCIENTIFIC WAY
Vaccines are not tested in a scientific way according to the
Scientific Method, for, to do so would expose them for the real hazards to health they represent.
For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines and neither is long-term follow-ups carried out in any careful or systematic way. The reason for this abuse of the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/humanist_agenda__when_man_beco4.html#Scientific_Method_
by vaccine manufacturers and the enforcing authorities is due to the universal assumption that vaccines do not cause problems and any meaningful check would be a waste of time and resources.
Moreover, an adverse vaccine reaction is defined by the Medical Cartel such that they only occur very soon after the shot is given. In other words, a situation that does not make sense or stands up to scrutiny. Vaccines obviously act in the body long after it they are given and a reaction can be gradual, weeks, months even years later.
Physical deterioration can be gradual and neurological problems can develop over time, as they do in various conditions and poisonings.
Hence, toxic conditions develop over time with other allopathic treatments and poisons passed off as medicines so surely they can also develop at a much later time with the very toxic vaccines, and even more so?
There are numerous cases where a vaccine as not only
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/world_depopulation_agenda.html#vaccine_failures
but the entire campaign highlighted the great harm inherent in the vaccination process. That is, where people en masse have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
Even the many instances of vaccine failure are glossed-over and the mountain of evidence ignored. In addition, if any of the vaccine failures are addressed the "experts" dismiss it as an isolated situation and state that overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe "elsewhere" and in "tests."
Nevertheless, all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred should alert the wise that these "vaccine failures" are not isolated situations.
However, the Medical Cartel's power is such and its
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/ufo_agenda_12.html#MastersofIllusion
and all pervasive that the obvious empirical evidence and strong correlations that proves and demonstrates vaccine harm are suppressed. Moreover, any one from the medical profession who dares challenge this suppression of truth risks not only his career and reputation but his life as well.
Moreover, that such clear evidence and strong correlations indicate harm, damage and death arising from vaccine use and no proper investigations are carried out alerts the wise that something is very wrong.
In addition, if an investigation is done people who assume that vaccines are safe and so are not interested in looking at the facts carry it out.
That is, when they do investigate they do so with preconditions and assumptions, definitions and ideas, which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
They investigate believing that inoculation is a proven and powerful medical treatment and any vaccine is safe. Thus, invariably, these prejudiced investigators come up with exonerations of the vaccine and pass these off as objective science in reports endorsing not only the vaccine in question but also vaccinations in general.
A salient example of this phenomenon is the treatment meted out by the Medical Establishment to the British doctor Andrew Wakefield, who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
Wakefield was the lead author of a 1998 research study published in
The Lancet titled
"Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis,
and pervasive developmental disorder in children"
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext
in which the link between the was made with the MMR vaccination and MMR vaccinated children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders and other disabilities.
Although the correlations between the MMR vaccine and autism are stunning it did not cause the Powers-that-be to thoroughly investigate the problem, rather, it only provoked the Medical Cartel to strike out at this man and his research.
As the controversy raged and concerned parents sensed that Wakefield told the truth, Wakefield resigned from the Royal Free Hospital in December 2001,
saying "I have been asked to go because my research results are unpopular."
The medical school said that he had left "by mutual agreement."
In February, 2002, Wakefield stated, "What precipitated this crisis was the removal of the single vaccine, the removal of choice, and that is what has caused the furore - because the doctors, the gurus, are treating the public as though they are some kind of moronic mass who cannot make an informed decision for themselves."
Eventually he was in front of the highest disciplinary board of the British Medical Establishment defending himself from charges of serious professional misconduct for his temerity in investigating the links between the MMR jab and autism in children.
Wakefield faced a disciplinary hearing
at the General Medical Council in London and faced being struck off the medical register after he and two colleagues published their findings and a direct link between the triple jab for measles, mumps and rubella and inflammatory bowel disease and autism.
Dr Wakefield defended himself by declaring that he had responded to the "plight" of mothers with sick children and it was his "duty as a physician and a human being" to carry out such investigations.
Later, in 2004 and 2006, Wakefield was accused by the Sunday Times of a conflict of interest in that monies were given to his erstwhile employer, the Royal Free Hospital (£55,000 from the UK's Legal Aid Board to pay for the research) and Wakefield himself who received an undisclosed £400,000 by the lawyers responsible for the MMR lawsuit.
The Lancet responded to the Sunday Times' investigation in a public statement, describing Wakefield's research as"fatally flawed," and said it would have rejected it as biased if the peer reviewers had been aware of Wakefield's conflict of interest. Although Wakefield denied the charges twelve of his co-authors of the Lancet paper later published a retraction of an interpretation.
In February 2009, the Sunday Times again attacked Wakefield by reporting that a further investigation had revealed that Wakefield "changed and misreported results in his research, creating the appearance of a possible link with autism."
Throughout the controversy various Medical Establishment elements and "experts" upheld the dogma and vigorously maintained that no link has been found between the MMR vaccine and autism and by inference that no link generally exists between vaccines and diseases.
This is a cynical and wicked stance given the number of vaccines routinely given to babies and infants today. Toxic vaccines whose synergistic effects, whose combined destructive power, are evident from the empirical evidence and from the obvious chronic sickness of contemporary society that has been vaccinated to an inch of their lives.
No real public and published studies of any depth have been carried out on the synergistic effects of vaccines.
Again, the general assumption made by both the Medical Profession and the trusting public is that all vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But, the truth is no vaccine is safe and so the potential damage increases when you give a number of them and especially in a short time period. And especially to babies whose immune systems are poorly formed, vulnerable and easily compromised.
Hence, the Medical Cartel's development, use and defence of vaccines are both a travesty of truth and a crime against humanity.
MEDICAL CARTEL FAILS TO PROVE VACCINES SAFE
The Medical Cartel has not only failed to establish the safety and efficacy of vaccines it has not taken the great moral duty to establish burden of proof that they are safe to use. It has wilfully neglected or ignored proofs to the contrary that dispel the myth of vaccination as the wonder treatment that has eradicated some of man's greatest enemies. In short, the Medical Cartel has failed to establish burden of proof that vaccines are effective and safe.
Moreover, peddles a medical myth, a non-scientific and dangerous assertion, that vaccines work and are safe.
The burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people and vested interests, which manufacture, licence and profit greatly from them during public mass vaccination programmes.
The burden of proof is not on the recipients, the trusting, naive public, but Big Pharma, the Medical Establishment and government.
And for adequate proof, well-designed long-term studies with extensive follow-ups are required. That is, proper and unbiased epidemiological studies carried out by unprejudiced, disinterested competent scientists not in thrall or the pay of Big Pharma.
And particularly, researchers who properly and thoroughly interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. In short, the necessary and essential requirements that are not present in the Medical Establishment's authorised and mandated researches on vaccines and their effects upon human health.
The Medical Cartel's reluctance to carry out their due diligence and to establish the necessary burden of proof that their vaccines work and are harmless is understandable.
Why? Because vaccines do not work and are harmful to human health and any proper study of the subject would reveal this; which, of course, is something the Medical Cartel does not want to happen.
Vaccines and mass vaccination are intrinsic to the New World Order Agenda's Eugenic Population Control Agenda
by which the Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
plan to remove over 90%
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1995-99.html#Ted_Turner95percentreductionoofPOPULATION
of the world population and leave alive only
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
In other words, vaccines and mass vaccination are crucial parts of the Soft and Hard Kill strategies used
by the Power Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2008.html#RothkopfSuperclass
to cull and control humanity and nothing will prevent it from using them.
And certainly, no proper and adequate studies highlighting their baneful effects upon both the individual and society will stop them.
DISEASE PROBLEMS CAUSED BY VACCINES
Using vaccines can cause two potential harmful outcomes. One, because some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with the vaccinee gets the disease from the vaccine, which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Two, the vaccinee does not get the disease in the vaccine, but at some later time they develop another condition that is caused by the vaccine. For example, autism, or meningitis, or they become mentally disabled and, very commonly, develop some form of cancer in middle age.
The relative frequencies of these different outcomes are very hard to establish since the Medical Cartel has no vested interest in establishing them. On the contrary, they have every reason to obscure them.
Hence, the deliberate policy encouraged by the Medical Cartel of slack, sloppy science involved in vaccine manufacture and use. Moreover, the deliberate sketchy and poor follow-up research into a vaccine's effects upon the individual, especially months and years after "taking the shot."
Thus, in absence of proper research and adequate figures no reliable answers can be given on this most important matter. There can be no definitive answers to questions such as how many out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine. There are no reliable answers to such questions but anecdotal evidence and the spectacular rise of cancers and other emerging diseases imply that something is very wrong.
Vaccines are mysterious medicine; they are mystical preparations holding almost mythical status and as such are surrounded by many superstitions. And, as with all superstitions, there is a great deal of opinions and beliefs but very few useful facts. Furthermore, there are many stories most of which are designed to enforce the superstition and which are roundly endorsed by the Medical Cartel.
However, from many vaccine campaigns, various parts can be pieced together from which a narrative emerges that does reveal some very disturbing things. It is a narrative that tells how vaccines are harmful to human health and that many people have been harmed, a real harm often ending in death. Moreover, a narrative that tells how the harm is not limited to a few cases, as the Medical Cartel would gave us all believe, but is widespread and enduring.
The spectacle of groups of mothers who testify to the direct link between autism and childhood vaccines, who come forward and standing up at public meetings is a salient example of this great scandal. That they are essentially filling the gap created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
ANTIVIRAL PILLS
Ever since Alexander Fleming's discovery of penicillin in the 1940s, drugs that kill viruses have been the
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/holy_grail.html
of modern medicine. Penicillin is the group of antibiotics obtained from Penicillium moulds and used in the treatment of various infections and diseases. Penicillin was the first drug that could kill a broad spectrum of bacteria in the human body; consequently, they have saved many millions of lives.
Nevertheless, modern medicine has signally failed to find a drug that would be as affective on the viruses. In other words, there has never been a drug, which kills viruses the way antibiotics killed bacteria.
Hence the problem with colds and flu:
most of them are viral and so antibiotics are ineffective.
This then begs the question is there really such a thing as a drug that kills viruses:
Do the so-called antiviral pills such as "Tamiflu" work?
The manufacturers, of course, think so and make extravagant claims about their effectiveness.
Hence, "Tamiflu" maker Gilead whose blurb, without citing actual studies, that:
"The results of several clinical studies show that Tamiflu is up to 92% effective in preventing influenza illness in adolescents, adults and the elderly when taken once daily … [Tamiflu] is the first antiviral pill, effective against all common strains of flu, that can safely protect people who are in close contact with someone who has the flu."
However, pulling away the dense cloak of sales pitch and PR cloaking Gilead's "Tamiflu" one finds the actual words of the scientists involved in its production and their professional opinion on it.
The Physician's Desk Reference (Big Pharma's bible) tells a different story than the one presented in Gilead's propaganda.
In the Physician's Desk Reference, we read that "Tamiflu's" declared action is that it prevents flu viruses from collecting on cells by inhibiting a specific enzyme (neuraminidase ) which helps viruses to bind to cells.
However, there are problems with this.
First, the makers cannot prove this action, do not know if this is indeed the action of the drug, and so, are obliged to refer to it as the "proposed" mechanism of activity.
Second, and more pertinent, Gilead's scientists state that even though this "proposed" mechanism of activity seems to occur in culture, in Petri dishes in controlled laboratory conditions, "the relationship between the activity in a culture and the inhibition of influenza virus replications in humans has not been established."
In other words, Gilead's scientists who formulated "Tamiflu" admit that they do not know whether it works in humans.
Even if "Tamiflu" did what it says on the box, and inhibit virus proliferation in humans, it would not be effective for very long.
The Influenza Viruses are one of the fastest mutating of all known human viruses, mutating several times in one flu season.
Mutation even occurs within the same person.
Thus, at any one time there are hundreds of strains of influenza infecting people. This rapid mutation and scores of different strains is the reason why flu vaccines have never worked and have had virtually no effect on the incidence of flu.
Thus, while the flu viruses mutate the so-called antiviral pills do not and are rendered useless if, of course, they had any use in the first place
Gilead's scientists admit as such:
"Insufficient information is available to fully characterize the risk of emergence of Tamiflu resistance in clinical use."
The Physician's Desk Reference contains other pertinent information on "Tamilflu," for instance, the short window of opportunity claimed for its effectiveness.
"Tamiflu is indicated for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza infection in patients 1 year and older who have been symptomatic for no more than 2 days."
In other words, the scientists are saying"Tamiflu" does not work if the patient has had the flu for more than two days. Further reading reveals other serious limitations.
For instance, that "Tamiflu" cannot help any patients who are already sick with the flu but also its makers admit that they do not know if multiple courses of "Tamiflu" are safe, since they never tested for more than one course.
The manufacturers also state they cannot guarantee the safety a foetus during pregnancy if their drug is used and so warn pregnant woman not to take it. Therefore, they do not recommend "Tamiflu" during pregnancy.
The Physician's Desk Reference lists other declared side effects of "Tamiflu," a drug that has never been proven to work in humans, they are:
rash; swelling of face; epidermal necrolysis (skin death); hepatitis; cardiac arrhythmia; and aggravation of diabetes seizures.
"Tamiflu," which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2000, has never been proven to work in humans.
Moreover, it has had no effect on the incidence of flu since its first use.
The US Centres of Disease Control (CDC) has tested more than 50 strains of
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob.html#origin_h1n1
and found that 98% of them are resistant to "Tamiflu."
And yet it is now being glorified as a possible "Magic Bullet" for the Swine Flu Pandemic. Such is the nature of the antiviral pill and the Dark Propaganda associated with it that the Medical Cartel and mainstream media are hawking as the saviour of humanity from the Swine Flu Plague.
Gentle reader, understand, the Medical Cartel is not a benign alliance working for the best interests of society. At its highest level, the Medical Cartel is controlled by people who are not dedicated to helping people but, on the contrary, out to do them great harm.
They are people who work to a different agenda than the one supposed.
They are working to a Dark Agenda whose goal is the decimation of the world population, especially the Third World peoples, by whatever means necessary. And the Medical Cartel has found a wonderful tool to help them achieve their goals of world depopulation: and that is vaccines, which weaken people, make them
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/global_economic_meltdown__glob.html#sterilisation_vaccine
Moreover, reader understand, vaccines and mass vaccination are intrinsic to the New World Order Agenda's Eugenic Population Control Agenda
by which the Global Elite
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/2009__2_.html#Bilderberg
plan to remove over 90%
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/199599.html#Ted_Turner95percentreductionoofPOPULATION
of the world population and leave alive only
"500 million in perpetual balance with nature."
http://overlordsofchaos.com/html/1980-84.html#Georgia Guidestones
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 31.3.2024 kl. 04:08 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
31.3.2010 | 13:46
Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet, says John P. Holdren Obama´s science Car.
http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=576
Book he authored in 1977 advocates for extreme totalitarian measures to control the population
 |
 |
Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.
The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?
These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar.
In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax.
No one in their right mind would say such things.
Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich. The scans and photos are provided to supply conclusive evidence that the words attributed to Holdren are unaltered and accurately transcribed.
[UPDATE: Make sure to read the new statements issued by the White House and by John Holdren's office in response to the controversy raised by this essay -- you can see them below following the Ecoscience excerpts, or you can jump directly to the statements by clicking here.]
This report was originally inspired by this article in FrontPage magazine, which covers some of the same information given here. But that article, although it contained many shocking quotes from John Holdren, failed to make much of an impact on public opinion. Why not? Because, as I discovered when discussing the article with various friends, there was no proof that the quotes were accurate -- so most folks (even those opposed to Obama's policies) doubted their veracity, because the statements seemed too inflammatory to be true. In the modern era, it seems, journalists have lost all credibility, and so are presumed to be lying or exaggerating unless solid evidence is offered to back up the claims. Well, this report contains that evidence.
Of course, Holdren wrote these things in the framework of a book he co-authored about what he imagined at the time (late 1970s) was an apocalyptic crisis facing mankind: overpopulation. He felt extreme measures would be required to combat an extreme problem. Whether or not you think this provides him a valid "excuse" for having descended into a totalitarian fantasy is up to you: personally, I don't think it's a valid excuse at all, since the crisis he was in a panic over was mostly in his imagination. Totalitarian regimes and unhinged people almost always have what seems internally like a reasonable justification for actions which to the outside world seem incomprehensible.
Direct quotes from John Holdren's Ecoscience
Below you will find a series of ten short passages from Ecoscience. On the left in each case is a scanned image taken directly from the pages of the book itself; on the right is an exact transcription of each passage, with noteworthy sections highlighted. Below each quote is a short analysis by me.
Following these short quotes, I take a "step back" and provide the full extended passages from which each of the shorter quotes were excerpted, to provide the full context.
And at the bottom of this report, I provide untouched scans (and photos) of the full pages from which all of these passages were taken, to quash any doubts anyone might have that these are absolutely real, and to forestall any claims that the quotes were taken "out of context."
Ready? Brace yourself. And prepare to be shocked.
Page 837:
Compulsory abortions would be legal
| Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. |
As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren "hides behind the passive voice" in this passage, by saying "it has been concluded." Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that's whom. What Holdren's really saying here is, "I have determined that there's nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies."
And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there's no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for "compulsory population-control laws." In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that "the population crisis" has already become "sufficiently severe to endanger the society."
Page 786:
Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions
| One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society. |
Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what's especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals -- wrenching babies from their mothers' arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not -- but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don't be fooled by the innocuous and "level-headed" tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed.
Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.
This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I'm reminded of the phrase "banality of evil."
Not that it matters, but I myself am "pro-choice" -- i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn't mean I'm pro-abortion -- I don't particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice -- to force women to have abortions. One doesn't need to be a "pro-life" activist to see the horror of this proposal -- people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic.
There's a bumper sticker that's popular in liberal areas which says: "Against abortion? Then don't have one." Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you're against it or not.
Page 787-8:
Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock
| Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. |
OK, John, now you're really starting to scare me.
Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that'd be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government.
Page 786-7:
The government could control women's reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control
| Involuntary fertility control A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. |
Note well the phrase "with official permission" in the above quote. Johh Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don't.
Page 838:
The kind of people who cause "social deterioration" can be compelled to not have children
| If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection. |
To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book -- and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone -- but those who "contribute to social deterioration" could be "forced to exercise reproductive responsibility" which could only mean one thing -- compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to "force" people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people's bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No -- the only way to "force" people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions.
But what manner of insanity is this? "Social deterioration"? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that "some" people contribute to social deterioriation more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn't that eugenics, plain and simple?
And isn't eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice?
We've already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was "feeble-minded" and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, "Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity.
The italicized phrase at the end ("providing they are not denied equal protection"), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn't be racially based or discriminatory -- merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren's America determines that you are "contributing to social deterioration" by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people.
No no, you say, Holdren isn't claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he's stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more.
If so -- how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or -- most disturbingly of all -- perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book.
Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn't looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don't you just get your tubes tied already? But it's a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it's not so funny anymore.
Page 838:
Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size
| In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? |
Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?
Why?
I'll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual's body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime?
I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holgren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures.
Page 942-3:
A "Planetary Regime" should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born
| Toward a Planetary Regime Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, andincluding all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits. |
In case you were wondering exactly who would enforce these forced abortion and mass sterilization laws: Why, it'll be the "Planetary Regime"! Of course! I should have seen that one coming.
The rest of this passage speaks for itself. Once you add up all the things the Planetary Regime (which has a nice science-fiction ring to it, doesn't it?) will control, it becomes quite clear that it will have total power over the global economy, since according to Holdren this Planetary Regime will control "all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable" (which basically means all goods) as well as all food, and commerce on the oceans and any rivers "that discharge into the oceans" (i.e. 99% of all navigable rivers). What's left? Not much.
Page 917:
We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force
| If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involvespartial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. |
The other shoe drops. So: We are expected to voluntarily surrender national sovereignty to an international organization (the "Planetary Regime," presumably), which will be armed and have the ability to act as a police force. And we saw in the previous quote exactly which rules this armed international police force will be enforcing: compulsory birth control, and all economic activity.
It would be laughable if Holdren weren't so deadly serious. Do you want this man to be in charge of science and technology in the United States? Because he already is in charge.
Page 749:
Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism
| Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the "tragedy of the commons," wherein the "commons" is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint. |
This passage is not particularly noteworthy except for the inclusion of the odd phrase "pronatalist attitude," which Holdren spends much of the book trying to undermine. And what exactly is a "pronatalist attitude"? Basically it means the urge to have children, and to like babies. If only we could suppress people's natural urge to want children and start families, we could solve all our problems!
What's disturbing to me is the incredibly patronizing and culturally imperialist attitude he displays here, basically acting like he has the right to tell every ethnic group in the world that they should allow themselves to go extinct or at least not increase their populations any more. How would we feel if Andaman Islanders showed up on the steps of the Capitol in Washington D.C. and announced that there were simply too many Americans, and we therefore are commanded to stop breeding immediately? One imagines that the attitude of every ethnic group in the world to John Holdren's proposal would be: Cram it, John. Stop telling us what to do.
Page 944
As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000
| Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny.Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world. |
This is the final paragraph of the book, which I include here only to show how embarrassingly inaccurate his "scientific" projections were. In 1977, Holdren thought we were teetering on the brink of global catastrophe, and he proposed implementing fascistic rules and laws to stave off the impending disaster. Luckily, we ignored his warnings, yet the world managed to survive anyway without the need to punish ourselves with the oppressive society which Holdren proposed. Yes, there still is overpopulation, but the problems it causes are not as morally repugnant as the "solutions" which John Holdren wanted us to adopt.
I actually don't disagree with everything Holdren says. I agree with him that overpopulation is a problem, and that much of the environmental degradation that has happened is due in large part to overpopulation (mostly in the developing world). Where we disagree is in the solution. While Holdren does occasionally advocate for milder solutions elsewhere in the book, his basic premise is that the population explosion has gotten so out of control that only the most oppressive and totalitarian measures can possibly stop humanity from stripping the planet bare and causing a catastrophe beyond our imagining. Holdren has (apparently) no problem saying we should force people to not have children, by any means necessary. And that is where we part ways. I draw the line at even the hint of compulsory compliance to draconian laws about pregnancy and abortion; Holdren does not hesitate to cross that line without a second thought.
My solution would be to adopt social policies that are known to lead to voluntary and non-coercive trends toward a lower birth rate: increased education for girls in poor countries, better access to (voluntarily adopted) birth control, higher standards of living. In fact, population trends since 1977 have started to level off in the crisis areas of Asia and Latin America, primarily due to better standards of living and better education, which are known to decrease population growth. These non-oppressive policies appear to be sufficient to control the population -- and Holdren's decades-long panic attack seems to be unfounded.
Now, consider all the recommendations by Holdren given above, and then note that at his Senate confirmation hearing he said he would "keep policy free from politics" if confirmed. In fact Holdren has repeatedly said that science should not be be tainted by politics, telling the BBC just a few days ago that "he wanted to take the politics out of scientific advice." But have you ever seen more politicized science-policy recommendations than those given in Ecoscience?
For the doubters and the naysayers...
There are five possible counter-claims which you might make against this report:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax.
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context.
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them.
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable.
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now.
I'll address each in turn:
1. I'm lying, Holdren wrote no such thing, and this whole page is one big hoax.
Scroll to the bottom of this page, and look at the photos of the book -- especially the last two photos, showing the book opened to pages quoted in this report. Then look at the full-page scans directly above those photos, showing each page mentioned here in full, unaltered. What more proof do you need? If you're still not convinced, go to any large library and check out the book yourself, and you'll see: everything I claim here is true.
If you don't have the patience to go to a library, you can always view the actual contents of the book online for free for a brief trial period.
2. He may have said those things, but I'm taking them out of context.
Some have argued that the FrontPage article "takes quotes out of context," which is the very reason why I went and investigated the original book itself. Turns out that not only are the quotes not out of context, but the additional paragraphs on either side of each passage only serve to make Holdren's ideas appear even more sinister. You want context? Be careful what you ask for, because the context makes things worse.
But yes, to satisfy the curious and the doubters, the "extended passages" and full-page scans given below provide more than sufficient context for the quotes.
In truth, I weary of the "context game" in which every controversial statement is always claimed to be "out of context," and no matter how much context is then given, it's never enough, until one must present every single word someone has ever written -- at which point the reader becomes overwhelmed and loses interest. Which is the whole point of the context game to begin with.
3. He was just the co-author -- he probably didn't write these particular passages, nor did he agree with them.
First of all: If you are a co-author of a book, you are signing your name to it, and you must take responsibility for everything that is in that book. This is true for John Holdren and every other author.
But there's plenty more evidence than that. Most significantly, Holdren has held similar views for years and frequently wrote about them under his own name. It's not like these quotes are unexpected and came out of the blue -- they fit into a pattern of other Holdren writings and viewpoints.
Lastly, below I present full-page scans of the "Acknowledgments" pages in Ecoscience, and in those Acknowledgments pages are dozens of thank-yous to people at U.C. Berkeley -- where Holdren was a professor at the time. In fact, there are more acknowledgments involving Berkeley than anywhere else, and since Holdren was the only one of the three authors with a connection to Berkeley, they must be histhank-yous -- indicating that he wrote a substantial portion of the book. Even his wife is thanked.
I have no way of knowing if Holdren himself typed the exact words quoted on this page, but he certainly at a minimum edited them and gave them his stamp of approval.
4. What he said really isn't that egregious: in fact, it seems pretty reasonable.
Well, if you believe that, then I guess this page holds no interest for you, and you are thereby free to ignore it. But I have a suspicion that the vast majority of Americans find the views expressed by Holdren to be alarming and abhorrent.
5. He wrote all this a long time ago -- he's probably changed his views by now.
You might argue that this book was written in a different era, during which time a certain clique of radical scientists (including Holdren) were in a frenzy over what they thought was a crisis so severe it threatened the whole planet: overpopulation. But, you could say, all that is in the past, an embarrassing episode which Holdren might wish everyone would now forget. I mean, people change their opinions all the time. Senator Robert Byrd was once in the KKK, after all, but by now he has renounced those views. Perhaps in a similar vein John Holdren no longer believes any of the things he wrote in Ecoscience, so we can't hold them against him any more.
The White House gets involved:
Recent statements byHoldren and the Ehrlichs in response
to this controversy
When I originally wrote and published this essay on July 10, I said:
"Unfortunately, as far as I've been able to discover, Holdren has never disavowed the views he held in the 1970s and spelled out in Ecoscience and other books."
However, that is no longer entirely true. On July 15, both the White House and John Holdren's office issued statements on this controversy after prodding from reporters at both the Washington Times and the Catholic News Agency.
According to this article by Amanda Carpenter in the Washington Times, Holdren and his co-authors have now distanced themselves from the words published in Ecoscience 32 years ago. From the article:
When asked whether Mr. Holdren's thoughts on population control have changed over the years, his staff gave The Washington Times a statement that said, "This material is from a three-decade-old, three-author college textbook. Dr. Holdren addressed this issue during his confirmation when he said he does not believe that determining optimal population is a proper role of government. Dr. Holdren is not and never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization."
...
The White House also passed along a statement from the Ehrlichs that said, in part, "anybody who actually wants to know what we and/or Professor Holdren believe and recommend about these matters would presumably read some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times, rather than going back a third of a century to find some formulations in an encyclopedic textbook where description can be misrepresented as endorsement."
(The second quote above is from page 2 of the article.)
The Catholic News Agency also reported on July 15,
In Tuesday e-mails to CNA, Rick Weiss, the Office of Science and Technology Policy's Director of Strategic Communications, said the material at issue was from "a three-decade-old, three-author textbook used in colleges to teach energy policy."
He could "easily dismiss" fears that Dr. Holdren favors government control over population growth.
"He made that quite clear in his confirmation hearing," Weiss said.
He then quoted a section of the confirmation transcript in which Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) asked Holdren whether he thinks "determining optimal population is a proper role of government."
"No, Senator, I do not," was Holdren's reply, according to Weiss and a transcript of the proceedings.
In other remarks at the confirmation hearing, not cited by Weiss, Holdren told Sen. Vitter he no longer thinks it is "productive" to focus on the "optimum population" for the United States. "I don't think any of us know what the right answer is."
According to Weiss, Holdren "made clear that he did not believe in coercive means of population control" and is not an advocate for measures expressed in the book "and they are certainly not endorsed by this administration in any way."
Weiss also provided CNA with a statement from the book's other two authors, Paul and Anne Ehrlich.
The Ehrlichs said they had been "shocked" at what they called the "serious misrepresentation" of their and Holdren's views.
"We were not then, never have been, and are not now 'advocates' of the Draconian measures for population limitation described -- but not recommended -- in the book's 60-plus small-type pages cataloging the full spectrum of population policies that, at the time, had either been tried in some country or analyzed by some commentator."
Describing "Ecoscience" as a "textbook," they said its descriptions can be "misrepresented as endorsement."
In my original report, I challenged Holdren "to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience."
I ask my readers: Do you think these two articles count as the renunciation and disavowal I requested?
I'm not so sure. First of all, the disavowals were made by a spokesman and by his co-authors -- as of this writing, Holdren himself has never renounced and disavowed the contents of Ecoscience. Unless you want to count the one-sentence answer he gave during the confirmation hearing.
Under questioning from Senator David Vitter, Holdren did backpedal a bit concerning a different statement he made in the '70s about government-controlled population levels. Does this single sentence count as an across-the-board disavowal of every single specific recommendation he made in Ecoscience as well as in many other books and articles? My opinion is Not really, but as usual I'll provide the full evidence and the full context and I'll let you decide for yourself.
You can view the video of the confirmation hearings here (introductory page here), but be warned that it is an extremely long streaming video that doesn't work in all browsers, and the answer in question doesn't come until the 120th minute.
Because most people won't or can't view the entire video, here's a transcript of the relevant part, and you can decide for yourself whether his statement counts as a disavowal of his quotes cited in this report:
[Starting at 120:30]
Senator David Vitter: In 1973, you encouraged "a decline in fertility well below replacement" in the United States because "280 million in 2040 is likely to be too many." What would your number for the right population in the US be today?
John Holdren: I no longer think it's productive, Senator, to focus on the optimum population of the United States. I don't think any of us know what the right answer is. When I wrote those lines in 1973, uh, I was preoccupied with the fact that many problems the United States faced appeared to be being made more difficult by the greater population growth that then prevailed. I think everyone who studies these matters understands that population growth brings some benefits and some liabilities; it's a tough question to determine which will prevail in a given time period.
Vitter then asked, "You think determining optimal population is a proper role of government?" To which Holdren replied, "No, Senator, I do not."
(If you want the full context of this exchange between Vitter and Holdren, a complete transcript of their entire question-and-answer session can be found posted here.)
I'm not sure just how seriously we should take a statement made by someone during what is essentially a job interview. A few words spent reassuring the interviewer that you don't really believe all those things you spent thirty years elaborating in detail -- what else should we expect? That Holdren would say, Yes, I think the government should lower the U.S. population down to 280 million? Of course he wouldn't say that during the interview, despite what he may or may not really believe internally.
But let's spend a moment looking at these answers more closely. Both of them referred to determining a specific number of people that should be allowed as the population of the United States. First he said it was "no longer productive" to set a hard-and-fast exact number for the population of the U.S., and then said he doesn't think we should "determine the optimal population." But that still leaves the door open for the notion that the population should be lowered by whatever means in general without a specific numerical goal in mind. Holdren still did not say that he's against population control as a concept -- only that he thinks we shouldn't set specific numeric targets.
And more importantly in the context of this essay, he did not disavow any of the specific proposals quoted here -- forced abortion, "Planetary Regime," etc.
Rather than a fairly vague blanket disavowal given in response to a question on a slightly different topic during the confirmation hearings, and rather than a statement given by someone in his office, and rather than a statement issued by his co-authors, I still would like to see a specific disavowal by Holdren himself. And so I repeat,
I challenge John Holdren himself to publicly renounce and disavow the opinions and specific recommendations he made in the book Ecoscience; and until he does so, I will hold him responsible for those statements.
Columnist David Harsanyi, who received a similar semi-disavowal from Holdren's office, dismantles it quite effectively in an excellent piece he published on July 15 in the Denver Post, Reason Online and elsewhere.
And who wants to take up the challenge from the Ehrlichs issued by the White House to look into "some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times" to uncover "what we and/or Professor Holdren believe"? Seems like territory ripe for exploration. Post any research you uncover either here in the comments section at zomblog, or on your own blog. Anything that John Holdren or the Ehrlichs have written since 1977 is fair game -- according to the Ehrlichs themselves.
Before you read any further...
If you accept the self-evident veracity of these quotations, and are outraged enough already, then you can stop reading here. Very little new information is presented below.
(And if you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.)
But if you still harbor doubts that the United States Science Czar could possibly harbor such views, and want more proof, then read on for longer and fuller citations, and full-page scans of the pages in the book, as well as photographs of the book itself. And if by chance you are a Holdren or Obama supporter, and want to falsely claim that I have taken Holdren's statements out of context, then you'd better stop reading here too, because if you go any further then you'll see that I have given full context for the quotes and conclusive evidence that they're Holdren's -- removing any basis by which you could have questioned this report.
More Context: Complete extended passages from which the quotes above were taken
For most of these, I will present the following extended passages without further commentary -- judge for yourself if you think the context mitigates Holdren's intent, or only worsens the impression that he's completely serious about all this.
Page 837 full-length extended quote:
| To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated. For example, under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs could be enacted under the clauses that empower Congress to appropriate funds to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce, or under the equal-protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Such laws constitutionally could be very broad. Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society. Few today consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion, however. |
Let it be noted that John Holdren himself is among the few who "consider the situation in the United States serious enough to justify compulsion" -- in fact, that's the entire thrust of Ecoscience, to convince everyone that overpopulation is a catastrophic crisis which requires immediate and extreme solutions. So although the final sentence of the extended passage seems at first to mollify the extreme nature of his speculation, in reality Holdren is only speaking of all the unaware masses who don't see things his way.
Page 786 full-length extended quote:
| Social pressures on both men and women to marry and have children must be removed. As former Secretary of Interior Stewart Udall observed, "All lives are not enhanced by marital union; parenthood is not necessarily a fulfillment for every married couple." If society were convinced of the need for low birth rates, no doubt the stigma that has customarily been assigned to bachelors, spinsters, and childless couples would soon disappear. But alternative lifestyles should be open to single people, and perhaps the institution of an informal, easily dissolved "marriage" for the childless is one possibility. Indeed, many DC societies now seem to be evolving in this direction as women's liberation gains momentum. It is possible that fully developed societies may produce such arrangements naturally, and their association with lower fertility is becoming increasingly clear. In LDCs a childless or single lifestyle might be encouraged deliberately as the status of women approaches parity with that of men. Although free and easy association of the sexes might be tolerated in such a society, responsible parenthood ought to be encouraged and illegitimate childbearing could be strongly discouraged. One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even he possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society. Somewhat more repressive measures for discouraging large families have also been proposed, such as assigning public housing without regard for family size and removing dependency allowances from student grants or military pay. Some of these have been implemented in crowded Singapore, whose population program has been counted as one of the most successful. |
In the final sentence of this passage, Holdren speaks approvingly of Singapore's infamous totalitarian micromanaging of people's daily lives.
But to me, the most bizarre and disturbing aspect of the quote given here is that Holgren seems to think that economic disincentives to have large families are more repressive and extreme than taking away basic bodily rights. To Holdren, "removing dependency allowances from student grants" is more repressive than compelling women to have abortions against their will. A very peculiar and twisted view of the world, I must say.
Page 787-8 full-length extended quote:
| Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock. Physiologist Melvin Ketchel, of the Tufts University School of Medicine, suggested that a sterilant could be developed that had a very specific action—for example, preventing implantation of the fertilized ovum. He proposed that it be used to reduce fertility levels by adjustable amounts, anywhere from five to 75 percent, rather than to sterilize the whole population completely. In this way, fertility could be adjusted from time to time to meet a society's changing needs, and there would be no need to provide an antidote. Contraceptives would still be needed for couples who were highly motivated to have small families. Subfertile and functionally sterile couples who strongly desired children would be medically assisted, as they are now, or encouraged to adopt. Again, there is no sign of such an agent on the horizon. And the risk of serious, unforeseen side effects would, in our opinion, militate against the use of any such agent, even though this plan has the advantage of avoiding the need for socioeconomic pressures that might tend to discriminate against particular groups or penalize children. Most of the population control measures beyond family planning discussed above have never been tried. Some are as yet technically impossible and others are and probably will remain unacceptable to most societies (although, of course, the potential effectiveness of those least acceptable measures may be great). Compulsory control of family size is an unpalatable idea, but the alternatives may be much more horrifying. As those alternatives become clearer to an increasing number of people in the 1980s, they may begin demanding such control. A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences while redoubling efforts to ensure that the means of birth control, including abortion and sterilization, are accessible to every human being on Earth within the shortest possible time. If effective action is taken promptly against population growth, perhaps the need for the more extreme involuntary or repressive measures can be averted in most countries. |
Page 786-7 full-length extended quote:
| Involuntary fertility control The third approach to population limitation is that of involuntary fertility control. Several coercive proposals deserve discussion, mainly because some countries may ultimately have to resort to them unless current trends in birthrates are rapidly reversed by other means. Some involuntary measures could be less repressive or discriminatory, in fact, than some of the socioeconomic measure suggested. ... A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. This of course would be feasible only in countries where the majority of births are medically assisted. Unfortunately, such a program therefore is not practical for most less developed countries (although in China, mothers of three children are commonly "expected" to undergo sterilization). The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births. No capsule that would last that long (30 years or more) has yet been developed, but it is technically within the realm of possibility. |
Page 838 full-length extended quote:
| It is accepted that the law has as its proper function the protection of each person and each group of people. A legal restriction on the right to have more than a given number of children could easily be based on the needs of the first children. Studies have indicated that the larger the family, the less healthy the children are likely to be and the less likely they are to realize their potential levels of achievement. Certainly there is no question that children of a small family can be cared for better and can be educated better than children of a large family, income and other things being equal. The law could properly say to a mother that, in order to protect the children she already has, she could have no more. (Presumably, regulations on the sizes of adopted families would have to be the same.) A legal restriction on the right to have children could also be based on the right not to be disadvantaged by excessive numbers of children produced by others. Differing rates of reproduction among groups can give rise to serious social problems. For example, differential rates of reproduction between ethnic, racial, religious, or economic groups might result in increased competition for resources and political power and thereby undermine social order. If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection. |
Study this whole extended passage carefully for an extremely unsettling view into the legal brain of John Holdren. Some of the sentiments he expresses here are beyond the pale, and his legal reasoning boggles the mind.
Page 838 full-length extended quote:
| Individual rights. Individual rights must be balanced against the power of the government to control human reproduction. Some people—respected legislators, judges, and lawyers included—have viewed the right to have children as a fundamental and inalienable right. Yet neither the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution mentions a right to reproduce. Nor does the UN Charter describe such a right, although a resolution of the United Nations affirms the "right responsibly to choose" the number and spacing of children (our emphasis). In the United States, individuals have a constitutional right to privacy and it has been held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether or not to have children, at least to the extent that a woman has a right to choose not to have children. But the right is not unlimited. Where the society has a "compelling, subordinating interest" in regulating population size, the right of the individual may be curtailed. If society's survival depended on having more children, women could he required to bear children, just as men can constitutionally be required to serve in the armed forces. Similarly, given a crisis caused by overpopulation, reasonably necessary laws to control excessive reproduction could be enacted. It is often argued that the right to have children is so personal that the government should not regulate it. In an ideal society, no doubt the state should leave family size and composition solely to the desires of the parents. In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children? |
This extended passage is a perfect example of how the "full context" of a short quote only makes it worse; once you see Holdren's complete elaboration on the idea, you realize it's not some flippant notion he tossed off, but something he feels deeply about.
Page 942-3 full-length extended quote:
| Toward a Planetary Regime ... Should a Law of the Sea be successfully established, it could serve as a model for a future Law of the Atmosphere to regulate the use of airspace, to monitor climate change, and to control atmospheric pollution. Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus, the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and the oceans but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market. The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime should have some power to enforce the agreed limits. As with the Law of the Sea an other international agreements, all agreements for regulating population sizes, resource development, and pollution should be subject to revision and modification in accordance with changing conditions. The Planetary Regime might have the advantage over earlier proposed world government schemes in not being primarily political in its emphasis—even though politics would inevitably be a part of all discussions, implicitly or explicitly. Since most of the areas the Regime would control are not now being regulated or controlled by nations or anyone else, establishment of the Regime would involve far less surrendering of national power. Nevertheless it might function powerfully to suppress international conflict simply because the interrelated global resource-environment structure would not permit such an outdated luxury. |
Page 917 full-length extended quote:
| If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization. But it seems probable that, as long as most people fail to comprehend the magnitude of the danger, that step will be impossible. |
Full Context: High-res scans of all pages cited in this report
Click on each of the images below to see the full-size scans of the pages mentioned in this report:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Photographs of Ecoscience, inside and out
Any finally, for the final proof that this is a real book co-authored by John Holdren --
and that these are real quotes from that book -- and not some elaborate hoax, here are some photographs (as opposed to scans) of the book itself: 
If you'd like to comment on this report, you can do so HERE at zomblog.
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 21.5.2017 kl. 10:19 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (1)
24.1.2010 | 10:19
CHEMTRAILS YFIRLÝSING FRAMKVÆMDASTJÓRA FLUGFÉLAGS UM ÚÐUN KEMÍSKRA EFNA ÚT Í ANDRÚMSLOFTIÐ. Video og myndir. /AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf
This photos is taken from my house.
AN AIRLINE MANAGERS STATEMENT Project Cloverleaf
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/project_cloverleaf.htm
Posted by C.E. Carnicom on behalf of the author May 22 2000
http://www.carnicom.com/mgr1.htm
http://www.nowpublic.com/strange/project-clover-leaf-secret-chemtrail-program-revealed
Hr. Carnicom.
Ég las emalið sem þú fékkst frá vélvirkja sem vildi ekki láta nafns síns getið, og mér finnst það vera skylda mín að svara því. Ég vinn einnig hjá flugfélagi, þó að ég sé á hærra stjórnunar stigi.
This photo is also from my house in Iceland
Ég mun ekki segja hjá hvaða flugfélagi ég vinn, í hvaða borg ég er staðsettur, né heldur fyrir hvaða stofnun ég vinn fyrir, en það eru augljósar ásæður fyrir því.
Ég vildi að ég gæti skráð það sem ég er að fara að segja þér frá, en það er næstu ómögulegt og myndi að öllum líkindum hafa í för með sé líkamsmeiðingar / árás fyrir mig.
Þetta bréf frá nafnlausa vélvirkjanum hljómar satt.(ég bætti þessarri slóð inn hér 30. April 2024. https://educate-yourself.org/cn/chemspewermechanics17apr05.shtml )
Flugfélög í Bandaríkjunum hafa verið að taka þátt í einhverju sem kallast Project Cloverleaf (Smáralaufar verkefnið) í nokkur ár núna.
http://www.nowpublic.com/strange/project-clover-leaf-secret-chemtrail-program-revealed
Elstu dagsetningar sem ég man eftir eru síðan á árinu 1998.
Ég var kynntur fyrir því árið 1999. Þeir fáu starfsmenn flugfélagsins sem voru kynntir fyrir Project Cloverleaf voru allir látnir sæta rannsóknum á okkar bakgrunni okkar og ferli, og áður en við vorum kynntir fyrir því vorum við látnir undirita samkomulag um bann við uppljóstrun, sem í rauninni fól í sér að ef við segðum einhverjum frá okkar vitneskju, þá ættum við á hættu að vera fangelsaðir.
PROOF chemtrails are NOT contrails
chemtrail sprayers filmed from inside several different jets spraying chemicals.
Það er íslenskt lag sungið hér og þetta er sett inn af
islandonlinenews þó ég haldi það sé ekki íslendingur ...
Þetta er gróss sem gaurinn segir hér..!!Flugmaðurinn veit ekki að þetta er tekið upp að ég held..en það sem hann segir er bara staðfesting á því sem er að ske í veðurfarinu um heim allan í dag!!!
Secretly Recorded Chemtrails Pilot Speaks PROOF!
Secretly Recorded CHEMTRAILS Pilot Speaks Video1
28. maí 2012
SICK SINCE (CHEMTRAILS)..
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrails
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/haarp
There I did manage to get the spraying plane also.
But wow...that day I would guess was 20 ..
And they claim Iceland have clean air! Yeh you right!
Um 20 starfsmenn ásamt mér hjá okkar stofnun var kynnt málið, af tveimur yfirmönnum frá einhverri sérstakri stofnun stjórnvalda. Þeir sögðu ekki frá því hver hún væri.
Þeir sögðu okkur það, að stjórnvöld myndu borga flugfélaginu okkar, ásamt fleiri flugfélögum, fyrir það að losa sérstök kemísk efni úr almennings flugvélum.
Þegar við spurðum hvaða kemísku efni þetta væri og hversvegna við ættum að úða þeim, þá sögðu þeir okkur að þær upplýsingar væru einungis gefnar í algerri neyð og við hefðum ekki leyfi til þess að sjá þær..
Another taken from front of my house to south.
The mountain is Hafnarfjall. This is their route ..
Síðan héldu þeir áfram að fyllyrða að þessi kemísku efni væru skaðlaus, en að verkefnið var það mikilvægt , að það yrði að framkvæma, hvað sem það kostaði.
Þegar við spurðum þá að því, hversvegna þeir útbyggju ekki bara herflugvélar til þess að úða þessum kemísku efnum, þá fullyrtu þeir að það væru ekki nógu margar herflugvélar á lausu til að losa kemísk efni á svona breiðum grundvelli eins og þyrfti að gera í þessu tilfelli.
Það væri þess vegna sem að Prjoject Cloverleaf væri hrint af stað, til þess að gera almennings flugfelögum kleyft að aðstoða (púff..skelfilegt..) við losun þessarra kemísku efna út í andrúmsloftið.
Þá spurði einhver hversvegna væri þörf á allri þessarri launung.
Fulltrúi stjórnvalda fullyrti það, ef að almenningur vissi að flugvélin sem þeir væru að fljúga með, væri að losa kemísk efni (eitur) út í loftið, þá myndu umhverfissinnar verða brjálaðir, og fara fram á að úðuninni væri hætt.
Einhver spurði einn af fulltrúunum, ef að þessi efni eru skaðlaus, hversvegna þá ekki segja almenning hvaða kemísku efni þetta væru og hversvegna við værum að úða þeim?
Hann virtist komast i uppnám við þessa spurningu og sagði okkur í yfirvalds skipunar tóni, að almenningur þyrfti ekki að vita hvað væri í gangi, en að verkefnið væri gert í þeirra þágu (almennings..)
Hann bætti við að við ættum ekki að segja neinum frá, eða spyrja fleiri spurninga um verkefnið. Með þessum orðum lauk kynningunni..
Öll skjöl á skrifstofu okkar sem varða Project Cloverleaf er geymt í læstum skjalaskáp. Engin hefur leyfi til að taka þessi skjöl út af skrifstofunni.
Mjög fáum starfsmönnum er heimilaður aðgangur að þessum skjölum, og varir þeirra eru innsiglaðar í sambandi við það sem stendur í skjölunum.
Hr. Carnicom, ég er ekkert fífl. .
Ég veit að það er eitthvað í gangi.
Og í hreinskilni sagt, þá er ég hræddur. Ég finn til mkillar sektarkenndar yfir því hafa vitað um svona aðgerð, en vera ófær um að segja nokkrum frá. Það étur mig upp að innan, vitandi það að fyrirtækið sem ég vinn fyrir geti verið að eitra fyrir Bandaríska þegna.
Ég vona að þetta bréf muni opna augu einhverra yfir því hvað sé í gangi. Ég vildi óska þessa að ég gæti látið þig hafa upplýsingarnar á skýrslutæku formi, en þú verður að skilja hversvegna ég verða að vera algjörlega nafnlaus. Með kærri þökk.
Þýðandi Agný.
Ljósmyndirnar eru teknar frá húsinu mínu nema ein..
P.S. Project Cloverleaf er chemtrail úðun...
Hér eru video sem ég hef safnað um chemtrails og HAARP
og áætlun elítunnar um fólksfækkun í heiminum og hver tilgangurinn er með þessu öllu ógeði..
En það er sko að fækka afætum jarðarinnar niður í álíka marga og búa á Islandi...Allt í þágu elítunnar til að búa til þeirra own Paradis á jörðu...og en ef þið afrekið að horfa á flest þessarra videoa þá er þetta nokkuð augljóst því miður.. voru það ekki 141.000 manns "who will be saved on the doomsday"? nema það að þessi elíta ætlar sér að stjórna því ...en ekki láta það í hendurnar á einhverjum Guð ....þeir leika það hlutverk hér..
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrails
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/haarp
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/%2527population+control-+none+dare+call+it+genocide%2527
http://vodpod.com/ingaorama/tag/chemtrail+and+haarp
Playing God with the atmosphere - the 'Shield Project' or 'Operation Cloverleaf'
http://www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/playing_god.html
Barack Obama - Zionist Wolf In Sheep's Clothing
http://www.nogw.com/aluminum.html
Chemtrails - Shocking Phoenix Air Quality Test Results
http://www.rense.com/general82/chemit.htm
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 1.5.2024 kl. 15:16 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (0)
12.1.2010 | 14:01
KARLMENN! FORÐIST PSA BLÖÐRUHÁLSKIRTILS KRABBAMEINS SKIMUN
Men: Avoid Prostate-Cancer PSA Screening
by John McDougall, MD
byJon McDougall, MD
Recently by John McDougall, MD:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/mcdougall2.1.1.html
SJÚKDÓMSVÆÐING...
“...er sala sjúkdóma, það sem að breikkar landamæri sjúkdóma og stækkar markaðinn fyrir þá sem selja og dreifa meðferðar úrræðum.
Það eru skýr dæmi um að flestar sjúkdóms – vakningar herferðir sem styrktar eru beint af lyfjaiðnaðinum- eru meira ætlaðar til þessselja lyf, en ekki að upplýsa og fræða, sem miðar að því að koma í veg fyrirsjúkdóma eða viðhalda heilbrigði.
Sjúkdómsvæðing gerir heilbrigt fólk að sjúklingum, sóar dýrmætum auðlindum, og „læknining“ orsakar skaða. ”
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030191
Ray Moynihan
Science writer for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and the British Medical Journal
http://www.drmcdougall.com/misc/2009nl/aug/king.htm
Á föstudeginum 21 Ágúst 2009, þá breytti sjónvarpsþátturinn þúsundum annars heilbrigðra karlmanna í sjúklinga, og olli þeim óbætanlegum skaða, þegar gestir sjónvarpsþáttarins John McEnroe, Michael Milken, og Christopher Rose mæltu með því að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu aðfara í PSA rannsókn, í þeim tilgangi að finna blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.
( Þennan þátt er líka hægt að finna frían á iTunes sem podcast og sem transcript.) https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lkl/date/2009-08-21/segment/01
Ég (John McDougall, MD ) þekki Larry King persónulega.
Ég var gestur á hans alþjóðlega útvarpsþætti 3 sinnum í fjarlægri fortíð. Hann er heiðarlegur maður, en ég tel að hann hafi verið gerður að ginningarfífli fyrir blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins bisnessinn, á kostnað heilsu karlmanna á þessu tiltekna kvöldi.
Þátturinn snart við tilfinningalegum þræði áhorfenda, með lifandi og hljóðrituðum vitnisburði frá frægum mönnum, sem höfðu sögu af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameini sem hafði verið uppgötvað með PSA prófun.
Fyrrverandi ráðherra, hershöfðinginn Colin Powell, framkvæmdarstjóri LosAngeles Dodger Joe Torre, útvarpsþáttar stjórnandinn Don Imus, leikarinn Charlton Heston, leikarinn Jerry Lewis, golfleikarinn Arnold Palmer, borgarstjóri New York Rudy Giuliani, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn John Kerry, öldungardeildar þingmaðurinn Bob Dole, og hershöfðinginn Norman Schwarzkoff, sögðu allir sögu sína af viðureign sinni við blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein og augljósan ávinning sem þeir töldu að þeir hefðu fengið vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir fylgdi.
Fræg sjónvarpsstjarna Merv Griffin kom einnig fram í video klippu, en sem dæmi „ heimska sjúklingsins“ sem hunsaði ráðleggingar læknisins og galt fyrir með lífi sínu. ( Af þessum langa lista gætir þú ályktað sem svo að allir eldri menn hefðu blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.)
Áhorfendum var sagt það að með nútíma tækni þá séu hinir kvíðvænlegu fylgikvillar vegna lausheldni og getuleysis núna sjaldgæfir.
Gestirnir mættu engri mótstöðu vegna þeirra samræmdu skilaboða um að allir karlmenn yfir 40 ára ættu að vera rannsakaðir – og það var engum símtölum svarað á þessari klukkustund sem þátturinn var á.
Það verður að viðurkennast, að gestgjafinn Larry King gerði tilraun til að vekja máls á ágreiningnum sem er í kringum notkun tiltekinna blöðruhálskirtils mótefnavaka (PSA) og stafrænnar endaþarms skoðunar (DRE), og meðferðarinnar sem á eftir kemur - en hans ögrandi athugasemdir voru alltaf hunsaðar af gestum hans.
Hugsanlega var Larry King meðvitaður um það að margar af skoðununum sem komu fram á meðan á þessum klukkutíma langa þætti væru rangar, og andstætt ráðleggingum fyrir PSA prófun, sem gerð er af American College of Preventive Medicine, British Columbia Office of Technology Assessment, Canadian Cancer Society, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, og öðrum sjálfstæðum iðnaðar- samtökum.
Who’s Recommending PSA Testing? HVERJIR MÆLA MEÐ PSA PRÓFUN? Organizations Against (or Not Supporting) PSA Testing: SAMTÖK GEGN ( EÐA STYÐJA EKKI) PSA PRÓFUN. American College of Preventive Medicine Organizations Supporting PSA Testing: SAMTÖK SEM STYÐJA PSA PRÓFUN. American Urological Association This list is incomplete; however, note that special interest groups representing the prostate cancer industries support PSA testing. |
FYLGIÐ PENINGASLÓÐINNI.
Það er kanski engin tilviljun að helsti stuðningur fyrir snemm búinni greiningu blöðruhálskirtils karabbameins með PSA prófun, kemur frá læknisfræðilegum verslunarsamtökum.
Besta dæmið er American Urological Association,
http://www.auanet.org/content/homepage/homepage.cfm
sem kemur fram fyrir hönd meira 16,500 meðlima sérstakra hagsmunar samtaka (aðallega fólks innan þvagfærafræðinnar/urology ogoncology) og styrkt af ( lyfja) iðnaðarfyrirtækjum, eins og Glaxo Smith Kline, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, og mörgum öðrum fyrirtækjum sem fá innkomu frá karlmönnum með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein.
Allir þrír gestirnir í þessum Larry King Live þætti, reyndust hafa fjárhagsleg tengsl við blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins iðnaðarins.
John McEnroe er opinber talsmaður fyrir lyfjafyrirtæki, Michael Milken vinnur með læknis lyfjaiðnaðinum í gegnum Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinsstofnunina (Prostate Cancer Foundation), og Dr.Christopher Rose er oncologist geislafræðingur og starfar sem forstjóri lækna hjá Krabbameins miðstöðinni fyrir geislameðferðir í Beverly Hills. (The Center for Radiation Therapy of Beverly Hills.)
Óneitanlega mun vítæk PSA prófun þýða meiri gróða fyrir lækna, sjúkrahús, rannsóknarstofur, og tækjabúnaðar – og lyfjaframleiðslu fyrirtækin.
Að vissum tíma liðnum þá virðist sem þessi tiltekni Larry King Live þáttur 21. Ágúst 2009, geti hafa verið kynningarhluti ætlað til að selja lyfið Avodart fyrir lyfjarisann Glaxo SmithKline (GSK).
Þann 16 Mars 2009 var það tilkynnt (announced)
http://www.morethanmedicine.us.gsk.com/blog/2009/03/prostate-health-is-a-serious-issue.html
að MacEnro hefði gengið til liðs við GSK til þess að biðja karlmenn um að fara til læknis í þeim tilgangi að vita hvert þeirra PSA stig væri.
Þann 27 April 2009 voru niðurstöður (results)
http://www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10047.htm úr prófunum hjá REductionby DUtasteride of prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) tilkynntar á fundi hjá Samtökum Amerískra Þvagfærafræðinga, (American Urological Association) í Chicago, Illinois.
Í þessarri rannsókn sýndi dutasteride, sem er hamlari fyrir blöðrukirtils-örvandi androgen5- alpha-dihhydrotestosterone, að fækka fjölda manna með blöðruhálskirtils krabbameinum 5% sem fannst með vefjasýnistöku. GSK selur dutasteride sem Avodart.
Með þessar niðurstöður frá REDUCE ferlinum, þá kemur áskorunin við að markaðsetja vöruna, sem sé að finna viðskiftavini / kúnna;
í þessu tilfelli, karlmenn með ívið hækkað PSA stig.
Þetta var akkurat það sem Larry King Live þátturinn afrekaði!
John McEnroe vann sitt verk vel.
Með um það bil 1,300.000 áhorfndur daglega, þá bætti þessi þáttur tvímælalaust við þá 218,900 karlmenn sem greindir eru árlega með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein í Bandaríkjunum.
Uppgötvun á hækkuðu PSA gæti gagnast karlmönnum, að undan skyldum þeim sem fara í núverandi meðferðir eins og skurðaraðgerðir, geislameðferð, og lyfjameðferð ( sviptingu androgens) hafa ekki sýnt sig í að bjarga lífum ( um
það bil 27,050 karlmenn létust árið 2007 af þessum sjúkdóm).
HVERSVEGNA PSA PRÓFUN OG MEÐDFERÐIN SEM FYLGIR Á EFTIR MISTEKST.
Á yfirborðinu lítur það þannig út að vegna snemmbúinnar uppgötvunar krabbameins í blöðruhálskirtlinum, muni uppgötvunin lengja lífdaga karlmannanna.
Hvað sem því líður, þá sýna rannsóknar niðurstöður annað.
Fyrsta skýrslan frá Blöðruhálskirtils, Lungna, og Eggjastokka (PLCO) Krabbameins skimunar ferill, á áhrif skimunar með sérstakt blöðruhálskirtils antigen (PSA) prófun og stafræna endaþarms rannsókn (DRE) á dánartíðni af völdum blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins var birt í New England Journal of Medicine, March 26, 2009 – PSA og DRE bjargaði engum lífum.
Önnur þáttaskila skýrsla, birt í þessu sama hefti, var frá Evrópu og hún sýndi afdráttarlaust fækkun um minna en 1% en 1 dauðsfall hverjum 1000 karlmönnum sem tóku PSA prófið.
Það eru tvær ástæður fyrir því að PSA prófun mistekst að bjarga lífi: Fyrst, óhemju fá biopsy-prófana sannaði að krabbamein séu ógnun við líf þitt, og í öðru lagi sé snemmbúin uppgötvun goðsögn.
Um allan heim eru blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins tilfellin sem uppgötvast í smásjárskoðun á blöðruhálskirtlinum hjá 30% af karlmönnum eldri en 50ára.
Í USA er hlutfall smjásjár blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins jafnvel hærri í öllum aldurshópum:
8% manna á þrítugsaldri , 30% hjá mönnum á fertugsaldri, 50% hjá mönnum á sextugsaldri og 80% hjá mönnum á áttræðisaldri.
Hvað sem því líður, hjá flestum karlmanna þá munu þessar frumur sem líta út sem krabbamein bersýnilega aldrei dreifast, og þessvegna aldrei ógna lífi karlmnnanna.
Það var augljóst að Larry King vissi þetta, þegar hann spurði gesti sína tvisvar þessarrar spurningu.
„ Er það goðsögn að þú deyir með honum , en ekki af honum?“
Svarið er þetta: „ mikið fleiri karlmenn deyja með blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein en af völdum þess.“
Jafnvel þó að blöðruhálskirtils krabbamein komi fyrir hjá flestum karlmönnum, þá er verulega lítil hætta á að hann drepi sjúklinginn; dánartíðnin er 226 per 100,000 hjá körlum yfir 65 ára aldur.
Það hættulausa en mjög algenga krabbamein er vísað til sem dulins krabbameins. Krabbameinið sem drepur, er vísað til sem þróaðs krabbameins.
Því miður, þá geta læknar ekki sagt til um það, með því að skoða blöðruhálskirtilsvef í smásjá hvort að krabbameinið muni einhverntíma verða ógnun við líf viðkomandi.
Niðurstaðan, nærri allir karlmenn sem önnur þessarra tveggja tegunda krabbameins finnst hjá, munu fá einhverja af þessum hörkulegu meðferðum: skurðaraðgerð, geislun, geldingu, og/eða kemíska lyfjameðferð.
Sorglega staðreyndin er sú, að þeir karlmenn sem hafa árásargjarna, þróaða formið af þessum sjúkdóm, munu heldur ekki hljóta ávinning af þessari meðferð, vegna þess að í þessum tilfellum er uppgötvunin með PSA og DRE alltof sein, til þess að þær meðferðir sem eru í dag muni koma að gagni.
Eftir 10 ára vöxt, þegar þessi 2 próf verða jákvæð, þá er meðaltal krabbameins massans inni í blöðruhálskirtlinum orðið um 1 cm í þvermál, eða sem samsvarar stærð strokleðurs á enda blýants, og samanstendur af um það bil billjón frumna. 5
Eins og þú getur séð, „snemmbúin uppgötvun“ er goðsögn og rangnefni – þriðjungur vaxtarins af þessu þróaða formi af þessum sjúkdóm, hafði þegar átt sér stað án vitundar sjúklingsins og hans læknis.
Í þessum fátíðu tilfellum, þegar þetta er raunverulega, „ banvænt form blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins.“ eftir 10 ára vöxt, þá hefur það þegar dreift sér um líkama mannsins.
Þegar þú ákveður að fara í PSA próf þá ertu að spila á þann möguleika að prófið muni mögulega finna krabbamein, sem muni geta verið meðhöndlað með góðum árangri og bætt lífsgæði þín og lengt þitt líf..
Hugsaðu smástund..
Þú ert að veðja á mjög lítinn möguleika af raunverulega fræðilegum ávinningi sem geti mögulega átt sér stað í fjarlægri framtíð.
Ef að PSA prófið er jákvætt (það eru 10%líkur á því) og að vefjasýnataka muni leiða í ljós krabbamein (það eru meira en 30% líkur á því) þá er harmleikurinn sem á eftir kemur tafarlaus, raunverulegur, lífs breytandi, og fyrir alla menn sem greinast (100%)
Bara það að greinast með krabbamein breytir manneskjunni það sem eftir er æfinnar.
Endurnýjun heilsu - og líftryggingar eru ekki lengur fáanlegar.
Finna starf við hæfi er mjög ótrúlegt.
Einu sinni greindur ( með krabbamein) ertu stimplaður „krabbameins sjúklingur“ það sem þú átt eftir ólifað..
Daglegar áminningar koma frá fjölskyldu, vinum, í lækna heimsóknum, og sögur í fjölmiðlum um krabbamein..
Áhyggjur og kvíði stjórna lífi sjúklingsins og fjölskyldu hans.
Framtíð hans verður að spurningarmerki..
Allir verkir í líkamanum eru túlkaðir sem endurkoma krabbameinsins .
Krabbameins fórnarlambið einangrast frá restinni af heiminnum.15
Þá eru það aukaverkanirnar frá meðferðunum.
Blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins rannsóknir skýra frá að þvagleki (lausheldni) var algengari hjá radical prostatectomy (35%) heldur en með geisla meðferð(12%) eða sviftingu androgen(11%)
Ris vandamál komu iðulega í kjölfar allra meðferðanna (radical prostatectomy, 58%; radiation therapy, 43%;androgen deprivation, 86%).16
Lausheldni þýddi blautar buxur, bleijur, og stundum þvaglegg ( catheter) í blöðru mannsins það sem eftir var æfinnar. Niðurstaða Blöðruhálskirtils Krabbameins rannsóknarinnar er íhaldssöm.
Það er líklegt að meira en 80 % af blöðruhálskirtils krabbameins sjúklingunum þrói með sér ris vandamál, erectile dysfunction
https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/treating/radiation-therapy.html
hvort sem þeir hafa farið í skurðaraðgerð, eða yfirborðs geisla meðferð.
Og þetta eru einungis 2 af mörgum aukaverkununum sem koma frá bestu lyfjunum sem hægt er að bjóða karlmanni með jákvæða PSA prófun.
ÞÝÐANDI AGNÝ
HEIMILDIR:
1)Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS, Parnes HL, MinasianLM, Ford LG, Lippman SM, Crawford ED, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA Jr.?? Prevalenceof prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or=4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med. 2004 May27;350(22):2239-46.
2)Woolf SH. Screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. Anexamination of the evidence. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov23;333(21):1401-5.
3)McNaughton C. Early detection of prostate cancer. Serendipity strikes again. JAMA. 1997Nov 12;278(18):1516-9.
4)Brawn PN. Prostate-specific antigen levels from completely sectioned,clinically benign, whole prostates.Cancer. 1991 Oct 1;68(7):1592-9.
5)Friberg S, Mattson S. On the growth rates of human malignant tumors:implications for medical decision making. JSurg Oncol. 1997 Aug;65(4):284-97.
6) NealDE, Donovan JL. Prostate cancer: to screen or not to screen? LancetOncol. 2000 Sep;1(1):17-24.
7)Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematicreview: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localizedprostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008Mar 18;148(6):435-48
8)Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL 3rd, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN,Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, O'Brien B, Clapp JD,Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF,Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Mortality results from arandomized prostate-cancer screening trial. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9.
9)Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, KwiatkowskiM, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Berenguer A, Määttänen L,Bangma CH, Aus G, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Blijenberg BG, MossSM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancermortality in a randomized European study. NEngl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8.
10)Franks LM. Proceedings: Etiology, epidemiology, and pathology ofprostatic cancer. Cancer. 1973 Nov;32(5):1092-5.
11) Holund B. Latent prostatic cancer in a consecutive autopsy series. ScandJ Urol Nephrol.1980;14(1):29-35.
12) Sakr WA . The frequency of carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of theprostate in young male patients. JUrol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):379-85.
13)Stamey TA, Caldwell M, McNeal JE, Nolley R, Hemenez M, Downs J. Theprostate specific antigen (PSA) era in the United States is over for prostatecancer: What happened in the last 20 years. J Urol. 2004Oct;172(4, Part 1 Of 2):1297-1301.
14)Selley S . Diagnosis, management and screening of early localisedprostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(2):i,1-96.
15)Little M. Chronic illness and the experience of surviving cancer. InternMed J. 2004 Apr;34(4):201-2.
16)Hoffman RM, Hunt WC, Gilliland FD, Stephenson RA, Potosky AL. Patientsatisfaction with treatment decisions for clinically localized prostatecarcinoma. Results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.Cancer. 2003;97:1653-62.
17)Wilson LS, Tesoro R, Elkin EP, Sadetsky N, Broering JM, Latini DM, DuChane J, ModyRR, Carroll PR. Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancertreatments. Cancer.2007 Feb 1;109(3):518-27
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 14.4.2024 kl. 19:34 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (2)
29.11.2009 | 22:19
SJOKKERANDI VIÐVÖRUN : FÓSTURLÁT AF VÖLDUM H1N1 SVÍNAFLENSU BÓLUEFNISINS.
-Swine Flu Alert -- Shocking Vaccine Miscarriage Horror Stories
Heilbrigðis yfirvöld Bandaríkjanna hafa sett ófrískar konur í hæsta áhættu hópinn til að fá H1N1 svínaflensubóluefnið, en er þetta í reynd öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur og þeirra börn?
Staðreyndin er sú, að á innihalds lýsingu svínaflensu bóluefnisins segir að það hafi ekki verið rannsakað með tilliti til þess, hvort það sé öruggt fyrir ófrískar konur.
Og fósturláts skýrslur frá ófrískum konum sem hafa verið bólusettar með H1N1 svínaflensu bóluefninu eru byrjaðar að streyma inn frá öllum þjóðum..
( Innskot Agný. Þetta er fínt...þeir eru sko að nota bóluefnið til þess að fækka mannkyninu..það er í raun það sem allt þetta flensu faralds propaganda áróður snýst um...Sama hvaða nafni faraldurinn nefnist...Svínaflensa 1976, West Nile virus, SARS, fuglaflensa..en þeim gekk ekki nógu vel að gera þetta að heimsfaraldri..en trikkið er að setja x veirur með í t.d árlega flensubóluefnið..og volia þú verður undarlega veikur rétt eftir bólusetninguna..sorry geta liðið upp í 2 vikur...nú..eða að þú hrekkur uppaf..ekk isíst ef þú ert í þessum víðfræga „áhættu“hóp..sem þýðir að þú ert með langvinnan sjúkdóm, undirliggjandi sjúkdóm, sem setur þig í þann hóp að þér er eiginlega skipað/mandatory að fara í sprautuna..
Ja reyndar falla heilbrigðisstarfstéttir líka þarna inn..herinn, lögreglan og slökkviliðsmenn...allavega í USA.. Líkaminn hefur bara miki meira en nóg djobb við að berjast við sjúkdómana sem fyrir eru, til að geta búið til mótefni...þannig að viðkomandi fær sjúkdóminn sem bólusetningin á að vera gegn.. Utan við öll önnur efni sem eru í bóluefninu...hvað með þá sem eru með óþol fyrir eggjum? Öll flensu bóluefni eru ræktuð í kjúklinga fósturvísi... þar að auki er mesta kvikasilfur/THIMEROSAL magnið í flensubóluefninu miðað við önnur bóluefni...
Thimerosal er líka í öðrum bóluefnum..þar á meðal er það í TWINRIX ADULT og TWINRIX PEDIATRIC bóluefninu sem er gegn lifrarbólgu A og B og er notað hér á landi bæði fyrir fullorðna og börn..Þó svo Thimerosal sé ekki í PRIORIX sem er MMR = mislingar, rauðir hundar oghettusótt bóluefnið sem notað er hér á landi...og hefur verið af mörgum tengt við autism/einhverfu..
SET SLÓÐIR HÉR FYRIR NEÐAN ÞAR SEM ÞIÐ GETIÐ KYNNT YKKUR MÁLIÐ SJÁLF EF ÁHUGI ER FYRIR HENDI.)
Slóðin hér fyrir neðan inniheldur sögur sem munu gera þig reiða/n og sjokkeraðan. Ef þú ert ófrísk móðir, viltu þá vera svo væn að fara EKKI í H1N1 svínaflensu bólusetninguna!
Í staðinn, gerðu allt sem þú mögulega getur til að forðast almennings stað, og vertu viss um að þú þvoir þér enn betur og oftar um hendurnar en þú ert vön.
Rannsakaðu og kynntu þér allar þær náttúrulegu aðferðir sem eru til, til þess að bægja flensunni frá..
Þýðandi Agný.
Sources:
Organic Health November 11,2009
Is The H1N1 Vaccine Safe? Shocking Stories From Pregnant Women Who Have Had
Miscarriages After Taking The Swine Flu Vaccine
Miscarriage / Pregnancy Loss Blog
From Krissi Danielsson, Former About.com Guide since 2007
The hype and hysteria over H1N1 Swine Flu has intensified worldwide without enough proper information about it.
Flu WasNot the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic
Flu Was Not the Real Killer in the 1918 Pandemic
Flu may not have killed most in 1918 pandemic
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5146PD20090205?feedType=RSS&feedName=scienceNews&sp=true
CanadaLooks at Vitamin D for Swine Flu Protection
ALERT:Special Swine Flu Update
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/10/21/Special-Swine-Flu-Update.aspx
SwineFlu -- One of the Most Massive Cover-ups in American History
ObamaDeclares Swine Flu Emergency
Algeng tenging við dauðsföll af völdum svínaflensu.
Ný rannsókn sem gerð var hjá Sjúkdómsvarnar eftirlitinu(CDC) uppgötvaði það að þau 36 börn sem látist höfðu af völdum H1N1 frá April – Agust þá höfðu einstaklingarnir engin krónísk heilsufars vandmál. En öll áttu þau við bakteríu sýkingar að stríða á sama tíma.
Sú mest algenga sýking sem var til staðar sem olli flensu tengdum dauðsföllum, var staphylococcus aureus. Við berum það helst í nefi og/eða húðinni.. Flensan veldur efri loftvega skemmdum, og býr til greiða leið fyrir staphs inn í lungun..
Þýðandi Agný.
Sources:
Diseases - In -The - Vaccinated 1
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated
http://1phil4everyill.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/proof-that-european-h1n1-vaccines-contain-mercury-squalene-and-tween-80/
Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated 2
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Diseases-In-The-Vaccinated-Page-2
Vaccine Injury Photos From The CDC
http://www.vaccineriskawareness.com/Vaccine-Injury-Photos-From-The-CDC
ER ÞETTA SVÍNA FLENSU AFBRIGÐI SÝKLAVOPN?
IS THIS VERSION OF SWINE FLU A BIO-WEAPON?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/7/
SWINE FLU HEFUR MÖGULEGA ORÐIÐ TIL VEGNA MANNLEGRA
MISTAKA VIÐ BÓLUEFNA FRAMLEIÐSLU.
SWINE FLU GET A LIVE BECAUSE OF MISTAKES IN VACCINE MAKING..
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/5/
HEFUR BAXTER LEYST SÝKLAVOPN ÚR LÆÐINGI Í UKRAINE?
HAS BAXTER INTERNATIONAL RELEASED BIO-WEAPON IN UKRAINE?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/978492/
BÓLUSETTUR MEÐ VALDI OG LÖGBOÐIÐ RFID FYLGT EFTIR MEÐ HERVALDI. VIDEOS
Forced vaccinations: a whistleblower's clear warning - Project Camelot
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/952875/
ÖREINDAR ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS ?
Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/974102/
URGENT WARNING H5N1 DNAin Flu Vaccine.
VIDEO Fínt að hafa fuglaflensu veiruna með
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/827643/
Warning...Hybrid Bird Flu About To Be Released?
FEMA líkkisturnar tilbúnar...FEMA COFFINS ARE READY!
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/month/2009/4/
The bird/swine flu is man made.
FUGLA/ SVÍNA FLENSAN ER BÚIN TIL AF MÖNNUM!!
ER MEXIKANSKA SVÍNAFLENSAN SÝKLAVOPN?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/869772/
Five die after seasonal flu vaccination
http://joongangdaily.joins.com/article/view.asp?aid=2911318
The New York Times mentions an 8-year-old boy from LongIsland who died roughly a week after receiving a seasonal flu vaccine
Flu Vaccine Ruins Beautiful Redskins Cheerleader
http://www.nfljuice.com/2009/10/20/flu-vaccine-ruins-beautiful-redskins-cheerleader/
Last year, a 6-year-old girl from Colorado died after getting the FluMist vaccine
U.S. Government Ignores Flu Vaccine Death
A Review of Four Approved Swine Flu Vaccines’ Ingredients
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/05/Swine-Flu-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx
The National Vaccine InformationCenter (NVIC )
http://www.nvic.org/ is calling for a comparison of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals for all health outcomes, and I believe it would be prudent to do so.
Flu Vaccine may Lead to Asthma in Infants
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/04/14/flu-vaccines-part-one.aspx
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2003/10/04/flumist-vaccine.aspx
Girl’s FluDeath Happened Within Hours
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 23.7.2015 kl. 05:02 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (7)
2.11.2009 | 17:35
ÖREINDAR ÖRFLAGA Í BÓLUEFNUM TIL ÞESS AÐ MERKJA OG HAFA EFTIRLIT MEÐ ÍBÚUM HEIMSINS.
Are Populations Being Primed For Nano-Microchips Inside Vaccines?
Vaccines Are One Big Experiment Causing Hundreds of Diseases In The Modern World
It's almost surreal, like something out of a sci-fi flick, but nano-microchips invisible to the naked eye are a reality that are already being hosted in wide-range of applications.
The question is, how long will it take governments and big pharma to immerse nano-microchips inside of vaccines
The Risks Of Vaccines Currently Outweigh Any Benefits To Human Health
http://preventdisease.com/home/tips78.shtml#vd
Video Documentaries
Human beings have been exposed to vaccines for more than two centuries.
Some vaccines have been more beneficial than others, however their underlying purpose was supposed to be very simple...to prevent disease. Yet the pathway to effective vaccines has been neither neat nor direct.
Unfortunately, our current vaccination model has little to do with the prevention of disease, something the public is catching on to.
Different researchers have done experiments with what are considered traces and have shown thimerosal "to cause adverse effects on methylation synthesis (MS) activity at concentrations well below the levels produced by thimerosal containing vaccines," said Dr. Waly and associates at Northeastern University.
They found, "The ethylmercury-containing preservative thimerosal inhibited both IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor-1) and dopamine-stimulated methylation with an IC50 of 1nM and eliminated MS activity. It should be noted that reduced IGF-1 levels have been reported in autism, which may also contribute to impaired myelination."
Many say that the charges of the dangers of thimerosal remain to be proven but there is over whelming evidence:
- Scientific studies.
- Basic chemistry.
- Documentation.
- The common experiences of thousands of parents.
- Records of thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of near-fatal incidents resulting in hospitalization recorded in federal databases.
- Several new scientific studies that show how "dead wrong" medical authorities are on this vital medical question.
For reasons that can only be described as basic conflicts of interest, greed, ignorance and even evil intention, one of the most serious crimes in human history has been committed across approximately six decades of time but got much worse in the 1990s as the number of vaccines containing thimerosal increased.
http://preventdisease.com/home/tips78.shtml
To tag and surveil global populations?
Nanotechnology (Öreindartækni) deals with structures smaller than one micrometer (less than 1/30th the width of a human hair), and involves developing materials or devices within that size. To put the size of a nanometer in perspective, it is 100,000 times smaller than the width of a human hair.
More than ten years ago, simple low-cost techniques improved the design and manufacture of nano-microchips. That unlocked a multitude of methodologies for their manufacture in a wide-range of applications including optical, biological, and electronic devices.
The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials, have enabled the required manufacturing technology towards nanorobots (öreindarvélmenni) for common medical applications, such as surgical instrumentation, diagnosis and drug delivery.
Japan's Hitachi says it has developed the world's smallest and thinnest microchip, that can be embedded in paper to track down parcels or prove the authenticity of a document.
The integrated circuit (IC) chip is as minute as a speck of dust.
Nanoelectrodes implanted in the brain are increasingly being used to manage neurological disorders.
Mohammad Reza Abidian,a post-doctoral researcher at the U-M Department of Biomedical Engineering said that polymers in nanotubes "are biocompatible and have both electronic and ionic conductivity."
He further stated "therefore, these materials are good candidates for biomedical applications such as neural interfaces, biosensors and drug delivery systems."
Depending on the objectives of such studies, research could theoretically pave the way for smart recording electrodes that can deliver drugs to positively or negatively affect the immune response.
Through nanotechnology, researchers have also been able to create artificial pores able to transmit nanoscale materials through membranes.
A UC biomedical engineering study appearing in the journal Nature Nanotechnology, Sept. 27, 2009, successfully inserted the modified core of a nanomotor, a microscopic biological machine, into a lipid membrane. The resulting channel enabled them to move both single- and double-stranded DNA through the membrane.
Professor Peixuan Guo who led the study said past work with biological channels has been focused on channels large enough to move only single-stranded genetic material.
"Since the genomic DNA of human, animals, plants, fungus and bacteria are double stranded, the development of single pore system that can sequence double-stranded DNA is very important," he says.
Such engineered channels could have applications in nano-sensing, DNA sequencing, drug loading, including innovative techniques to implement DNA packaging mechanisms of viral nanomotors and vaccine delivery.
"The idea that a DNA molecule travels through the nanopore, advancing nucleotide by nucleotide, could lead to the development of a single pore DNA sequencing apparatus, an area of strong national interest," Guo said.
Scientists working at Queen Mary, University of London, have developed
micrometer-sized capsules to safely deliver drugs inside living cells.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091001235443.htm
These "micro shuttles" could hypothetically be loaded with a specific microchip controlling the dose of medication to be opened remotely, releasing their contents.
Örflaga í staðinn fyrir pillur. Hvaðef þú færð ofnæmi fyrir lyfinu..
http://alvaran.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=88
Besides monitoring the dosage, the same microchip could be used to surveil the patient in conjunction with various tracking systems.
Þar fyrir utan að mæla skammta, þá gæti sama örflaga verið notuð til að hafa efftirlit með sjúklingnum í gegnum hin ýmsu eftirlits kerfi (Eins og t.d. gegnum GPS)
Scientists in the United Kingdom have recently reported
http://pubs.acs.org/stoken/presspac/presspac/full/10.1021/nn900991r?cookieSet=1
advances towards overcoming key challenges in nanotechnology.
They demonstrated how nanoparticles could move quickly in a desired direction without help from outside forces. Their achievement has broad implications, the scientists say, raising the possibility of coaxing cells to move and grow in specific directions.
Doug Dorst, a microbiologist and vaccine critic in South Wales, says these advances have an immense appeal to vaccine makers. "Biotech companies and their researchers have quickly moved most funding initiatives towards nanotechnology to increase the potency of their vaccines," he said.
If microorganisms inside of vaccines can be coaxed into targeting or invading specific cells, they could achieve their goal at an accelerated rate over conventional vaccines.
"Depending on which side of the vaccine debate you're on, whether pro or con, nanobots inside vaccine preparations could advance their effectiveness exponentially by either dramatically improving or destroying immunity depending on their design," he added.
Dorst claims that present day nanobot technology could just as easily be used to advance biological weapons as they can to advance human health. "For every fear that biotech propaganda proliferates about deadly diseases and how vaccines prevent them, it is one more lie to incrementally convince the masses that vaccines are effective."
The worry for Dorst is that one day vaccines "will do what they've always been intended for...control of the global populace."
Það veldur Dorst áhyggjum að einn daginn munu bóluefni, "gera akkúrat það sem þeim hefur alltaf verið ætlað að gera...en það er að stjórna fólskjölgun í heiminum."
Nanoemulsion platforms are already capable of developing vaccines from very diverse materials.
Mixtures of soybean oil, alcohol, water and detergents can be emulsified into ultra-small particles smaller than 400 nanometers wide (about 1/200th the width of a human hair).
These could be combined with any number of nano-microchips with all or part of disease-causing microbes to trigger the body's immune system.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine technologies.”
The article went on to describe the effects of their breakthrough:
“At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin."
Russia has recently announced a new manufacturing plant that will strictly produce nano-vaccines.
Rússar hafa nýlega tilkynnt að nýja framleiðslu verksmiðju sem muni einungis framleiða öreindar-bóluefni.
Project plans include development of two vaccines for human flu and bird flu and three biopharmaceuticals for boosting the immune system and increasing the efficiency of antibacterial and antiviral drugs, among other initiatives.
The human body is very resistant to nanoparticles that attempt to invade human cells. Scientists are intensely investigating methods to disrupt human enzymes that may degrade nanoparticles.
Experts at the University of Liverpool found a way around this obstacle
http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-Fate-of-Cell-Bound-Nanoparticles-122418.shtml
that could mean more efficient, topical drugs in the future, which could act a whole lot faster than the ones currently in use.
All these nanotechnological advances raise many issues and concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials, and their potential effects on medicine, global economics, as well as speculation about government surveillance.
These concerns have led to a debate among advocacy groups and governments on whether special regulation of nanotechnology is warranted.
The Environmental Protection Agency issued a news release last week saying that it had “today outlined a new research strategy to better understand
how manufactured nanomaterials may harm human health and the environment.”
http://www.epa.gov/nanoscience/files/epa_nano_wp_2007.pdf
Interesting as that strategy document is, it was hardly hot off the presses.
Indeed, many companies advertise their use of such billionth-of-a-meter-scale constituents as a measure of a product's state-of-the-art status, implying that ultra-small ingredients are an inherently good thing. They aren’t. Nor does size necessarily make these materials worse than others.
At this point it's just maddeningly unpredictable what nano things will do.
Proponents of nanotechnology are very critical of regulatory measures that may impeed its progression. Many of these critics have staunchly dismissed concerns as being fear-hyped conspiracy theories based on science fiction.
In the popular video game series Metal Gear Solid, many characters and soldiers in general, have "nanomachines" in their bloodstream, and are used to block pain, allow members of fire teams/patrols to share sensory information, heal bodily damage, as well as manipulating viruses central to video game's plot line.
Through the use of special effects and computer-generated imagery, several blockbusters starring Keanu Reeves including
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/ and
The Day the Earth Stood Still,
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0970416/ have dramatized how nanobots could effectively take control of their organic and inorganic targets.
Star Trek episodes and their theatrical releases such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek:_First_Contact have also depicted how nanoprobes (nanites) could infect an individual's bloodstream through a pair of tubules.
Regardless of the recurring themes of nanobots in video games, sci-fi shows and movies, nanotechnology is a reality, and nano-microchips are well on their way to being utilized in ways which may be detrimental to human health and freedom on a global scale.
The development of nano-microchips are a major thrust of governments and pharmaceutical industries who want the ultimate power and leverage over global populations for more profit and more control.
In December 2000, Former Chief Medical Officer of Finland, Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde, MD stated that it is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life.
Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved.
Today's microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe.
Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.)
The 20-billion-bit/second supercomputers at the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) could now "see and hear" what soldiers experience in the battlefield with a remote monitoring system (RMS).
When a 5-micromillimeter microchip (the diameter of a strand of hair is 50 micromillimeters) is placed into optical nerve of the eye, it draws neuroimpulses from the brain that embody the experiences, smells, sights, and voice of the implanted person.
Once transferred and stored in a computer, these neuroimpulses can be projected back to the person’s brain via the microchip to be reexperienced.
Using a RMS, a land-based computer operator can send electromagnetic messages (encoded as signals) to the nervous system, affecting the target's performance.
With RMS, healthy persons can be induced to see hallucinations and to hear voices in their heads.
Every thought, reaction, hearing, and visual observation causes a certain neurological potential, spikes, and patterns in the brain and its electromagnetic fields, which can now be decoded into thoughts, pictures, and voices.
Electromagnetic stimulation can therefore change a person's brainwaves and affect muscular activity, causing painful muscular cramps experienced as torture.
The NSA's electronic surveillance system can simultaneously follow and handle millions of people. Each of us has a unique bioelectrical resonance frequency in the brain, just as we have unique fingerprints.
With electromagnetic frequency (EMF)
http://preventdisease.com/news/articles/electro_risk.shtml brain stimulation fully coded, pulsating electromagnetic signals can be sent to the brain, causing the desired voice and visual effects to be experienced by the target.
This is a form of electronic warfare. U.S. astronauts were implanted before they were sent into space so their thoughts could be followed and all their emotions could be registered 24 hours a day.
The mass media has not reported that an implanted person's privacy vanishes for the rest of his or her life. She/he can be manipulated in many ways.
Using different frequencies, the secret controller of this equipment can even change a person's emotional life.
Með því að nota mismunandi bylgjur, þá getur stjórnandi tækisins jafnvel breytt tilfinningalífi manneskjunnar.
She can be made aggressive or lethargic.
Hægt er að gera hana/hann árásargjarna eða sljóa/sinnulausa.
(Innskot AGNÝ. Þá er þarna kominn grundvöllur til að koma manneskjunni á x geðlyf ..þetta snýst allt um peninga...ekkert annað!)
Sexuality can be artificially influenced.
Hægt er að hafa áhrif á kynhneigð.
Thought signals and subconscious thinking can be read, dreams affected and even induced, all without the knowledge or consent of the implanted person.
Hugsana merki og undirvitund er hægt að lesa, hafa áhrif á drauma og jafnvel auka, allt án vitneskju eða vitundar ígræddu manneskjunnar.
This secret technology has been used by military forces in certain NATO countries since the 1980s without civilian and academic populations having heard anything about it.
Þessi leynilega tækni hefur verið notuð af hervöldum í vissum NATO löndum síðan um 1980 án þess að hinn almenni borgari og akademíur hafi haft vitneskju um það.
Thus, little information about such invasive mind-control systems is available in professional and academic journals.
Það eru litlar upplýsingar fáanlegar um þetta innrásar hugar -stjórnandi kerfi í fag- og háskóla tímaritum.
The NSA's Signals Intelligence group can remotely monitor information from human brains by decoding the evoked potentials (3.50HZ, 5 milliwatt) emitted by the brain.
Prisoner experimentees in both Gothenburg, Sweden and Vienna, Austria have been found to have evident brain lesions. Diminished blood circulation and lack of oxygen in the right temporal frontal lobes result where brain implants are usually operative.
A Finnish experimentee experienced brain atrophy and intermittent attacks of unconsciousness due to lack of oxygen.
Targeting people’s brain functions with electromagnetic fields
and beams (from helicopters and airplanes, satellites, from parked vans, neighboring houses, telephone poles, electrical appliances, mobile phones, TV, radio, etc.) is part of the radiation problem that should be addressed by democratically elected governments.
However, there is currently no interest by any national government to seriously address this issue.
Hvað sem því líður þá er sem stendur enginn áhugi hjá alþjóða stjórnvöldum til þess að skoða þessi mál af einhverri alvöru.
The timeline for integrating nano-microchips inside of vaccines is speculative.
It could be just a few years, months or perhaps it is here and we already unaware of their integration within pharmaceuticals.
Regardless, due to the many military and political advantages, their implementation is inevitable.
However fraudulent, it was an imperative for world powers and pharmaceutical cartels to promote the effectiveness of vaccinations and enact national pandemic preparedness policies which mandate vaccinations.
In 2005 the World Health Organization (WHO) developed international health regulations that would bind all 194 member countries to pandemic emergency guidelines which could enforce such a mandate.
Without these procedures of public health (and propagandized vaccine campaigns) in place, there would be little or no voluntary cooperation from the public to roll up their sleeves and accept the inoculations.
Public participation is an essential tool that will soon allow big pharma to inject the most effective surveillence tool ever designed into billions of people.
Although nanotechnology manufacturing is currently available on a global scale, before biotech companies are able to initiate mass production and testing of nano-microchips inside of vaccines, they will likely sell the idea to the public.
Through various "health enhancement scenarios" they will encourage participation and publicly announce regulatory approval from the same policies and regulatory agencies they helped create.
By mid-summer of 2009, the WHO and the Center of Disease Control (CDC) effectively hyped a false flu pandemic
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/090109_flu_hype.shtml and convinced the world to submit to H1N1 vaccines. Additional doses of propaganda and possibly a biological event, may equally convince populations to knowingly accept microchips inside of vaccines under the guise of a "greater good" for humanity.
When our brain functions are already connected to supercomputers by means of radio implants and microchips, it will be too late for protest.
This threat can be defeated only by educating the public, using available literature on biotelemetry, nanorobotics and information exchanged at international congresses.
The time to act is now!
Nanotechnology Takes Off
Brain Chipping: Injectible Micro-Chips
One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 1)
One Mainframe To Rule Them All (Part 2)
Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 1 of 3
Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 2 of 3
Tolerance Lost by Dr. Andrew Moulden: Part 3 of 3
What is MASS ?
Vaccines Are One Big Experiment Causing Hundreds of Diseases In The Modern World
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/092109_vaccines_responsible_for_all_diseases.shtml
MASS is an acronym for many chronic illnesses and diseases that impair blood flow - "Moulden Anoxia Spectrum Syndromes."
One-size-fits-all global vaccination schemes have created MASS disorders on mass scales.
MASS disorders, from infectious diseases to vaccinations, have a common sequence of injuries which includes impaired blood flow, oxygenation, blood carrying capacity, and non-specific immune hyper-stimulation.
This is how Vioxx caused heart attack and stroke.
This is how pre-natal German measles caused autism-spectrum and organ damages.
This is how a systemic drop in maternal blood pressure, during gestation,causes Mobius syndrome(and autism-spectrum).
This is how repeat vaccination is causing dementia.
MASS is how vaccinations are causing a multitude of chronic illnesses and disease. It is not the germs causing this problem. It is the response of the body to de-railed and unbalanced immune challenges.
Solutions without Vaccines
There is a better way to prevent disease. Vaccination only masks the cause of disease, it does nothing to address the core problem in physiology - the non-specific MASS response and colloidal stability of blood flow dynamics. There are alternative solutions to controlling infectious diseases in populations that do not require injecting foreign substances into your body.
Simple solutions are very effective. Besides an abundance of immunity enhancers, if you use the power of nature and expose your body to greater amounts of sunlight, eat a variety of leafy greens and organic fruits/vegetables, invest at least 20-30 minutes per day exercising, and adopt a nutritional regimen of clean unprocessed foods, vitamins,minerals, superfoods and herbs, not only will this advance your health, you may never get sick again!
Vaccines Are Producing The Pandemic, Not The Flu
http://preventdisease.com/news/09/081809_swine_flu_hype.shtml
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 16.10.2023 kl. 17:46 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (11)
10.9.2009 | 05:20
Einkaleyfi skráð fyrir H1N1 bóluefninu (2007) löngu fyrr en svínaflensu virusinn hafði breiðst út!
URGENT - H1N1 Vaccine Patent Filed (2007) Long Before the Swine Flue Virus Was Spread!
by Walter Burien
08/20/09
Veitið sérstaka afhygli H1N1 afbrigðinu sem skráð er í einkaleyfinu 2007.
Kemur í heimabæ þinn fljótlega! Eftirfarandi er svar mitt til John Perna í sambandi við skráða einkaleyfis umsókn (US Patent Application ), sem lýtur að einkaleyfi fyrir svínaflensu virus bóluefni (H1N1).
Einkaleyfis umsóknin var skráð löngu áður en Mexikanska svína flensan að því að talið er, kom fram á sjónarsviðið sem nýtt virus afbrigði, upprunnið frá „Svína búgarði“ í Mexico..
Í pósti John´s afritað að hluta til neðan við mitt svar, þá taldi hann að einkaleyfis umsóknin fyrir H1N1 bóluefninu væri frá 2008, stuttu áður en svínaflensan braust út í Mexico. Ég er vel kunnugur einkaleyfum, svo ég skoðaði US einkaleyfis og vörumerkja síðuna til þess að sannreyna að hann færi með réttmál og uppgötvaði að honum hafði orðið á skyssa.
Upprunalega umsóknin var í rauninni skráð árið 2007!
Löngu fyrr en virusinn var sviðsettur sem „nýtt virus afbrigði“ í Mexico.!
Það sem ég hef mestar áhyggjur af er að þessar upplýsingar sem nú hafa verið staðfestar, muni verða til þess að reka síðasta naglann í kistuna á öllu því sem kallast „borgargarleg“ ríkisstjórn í þessu landi, er lýtur að endurskipulagningu og síðan endurreisn.
Og ég vona, nei ég bið þess að þegar það verði gert að lokum, að þá muni þeir hálshöggva meira en 85% af lögmönnum kerfisins. Það er nákvæmlega 90% af lausninni.
Sent FYI from, Walter Burien -CAFR1.com
Bréf til John Perna:
John:
Viltu vinsamlega senda þetta til allra tengiliða þinna og fjölmiðla hóps.
Þú ert ekki með rétta umsóknar dagsetningu! Hún er ekki 08/28/2008,
heldur er hún 08/28/2007 einu ári eldri!
Sem er miklu stærra mál en þú taldir!!
2008 dagsetningin er þegar einkaleyfis umsóknin var tekin til loka skoðunar til samþykktar.
Skráningar dagsetningin ( þegar umsóknin er móttekin á skrifstofu PTO ) var nákvæmlega einu ári fyrr!
Ég set slóðirnar hér fyrir neðan sem eru frá US Einkaleyfis og Vörumerkja skrifstofunni..
því til staðfestingar. Þú getur líka hlaðið niður hvaða hluta sem er, eða afritað frá þessum blaðsíðum og ég mæli sterklega með því að þú gerir það.
( Einkaleyfið gæti verið háð lagabreytingum sem falla undir leynilegt og því verið fjarlægt.)
Hér er US Einkaleyfisskrifstofu slóðin til að sjá einkaleyfið-
Og já..svínaflensu virusinn H1N1 er skráður „ með mörgum öðrum“ eins og afritað er frá Einkaleyfis umsóknum hér: [0056]
Additionally, there are several thousand variants of the H1N1 virus going back
to the early 1900's with several for the swine flu with the first in the US being from TN in the 1930's -They are promoting one of thousands, get it?
There are many variants to the H1N1.
http://CAFR1.com/variants.html
(95% of the people think there is just one H1N1 - WRONG! )
„ Bóluefnið getur t.d. verið notað til innspýtingar sem forvarnarlyf, átt við sem vörn gegn virus sjúkdóm. Sérstaklega tekið framyfir ímynd samsetningar eða bóluefnis sem inniheldur fleiri en eINN mótefniSVAKA, t.d. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 eða 8, einkum þegar um ólík virus afbrigði er að ræða, staðgengil eða tegundir eins influensa A og influensa B, einkum valið frá einu eða fleiri mennskum afbrigðum
H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, H5N1, H7N7, H1N2, H9N2,H7N2, H7N3, H10N7 staðgenglum, af svína flensu H1N1, H1N2, H3N1 og staðgengils tegund frá hunda eða hesta flensu H7N7, H3N8 staðgengils eða af asíu H5N1,H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H9N2, H5N2, H4N8, H10N7, H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5 staðgengils tegundum..“
Það sem vedur mér mestum áhyggjum, eru allir hinir virusarnir sem eru skráðir þarna, en hafa ekki enn komið fram á sjónarsviðið.
Þú skilur hvað ég er að fara?!!
Það getur verið að þú munir vilja koma þessu þegar í stað í hendur sérfræðinga til umsagnar..
Slóðin sem fer hér á eftir er sú mikilvægasta.!
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair
Það kemur fram þar að upprunalega umsóknin var skráð 08/28/2007. !!
Byrjaðu á þessu hér (fara inn á slóðina / go to the link
http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair ) og þegar þú kemur að leitar síðunni
(search page) gættu þá að því að vera með hakað í „umsóknar númer“ og
þú setjir í leitar svæðið (search field) umsóknar númerið, sem er: 60/966,724
Þegar síðan opnast smelltu þá á flipann „"Image File Wrapper" og veldu
síðan "Specifications"og farðu á bls "13“ af specifications.
http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
Hér munt þú sjá tilvísunina á virusinn sem skráður er hér að ofan og gerði
það "08/28/07" löngu áður en virusinn er kynntur sem hið
„ Nýja og banvæna afbrigði“
Svo bara mín persónulega skoðun á málinu:
Þeir geta sko tekið bóluefnið og stungið í þeirra eigin R*** og það sem passar ekki þar.. þá geta þeir gert það sama við US áróðurs ráðuneytið og aðal málpípu h******þeirra
í tilbúnum frétta flutningi, sem hafa komið svínaflensu brjálæðinu á framfæri..
Walter Burien - http://cafr1.com/
IN REPLY TO THE FOLLOWING:
------------------------------------------
From: | "John Perna" |
Subject: | H1N1 Vaccine Patent Filed Before the Virus Was Spread! |
Date: | Thu, August 20, 2009 6:30 am |
H1N1 BÓLUEFNIS EINKALEYFIS UMSÓKN SKRÁÐ ÁÐUR EN VIRUSINN HAFÐI KOMIÐ FRAM Á SJÓNARSVIÐIÐ!
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/08/refuse-and-resist-mandatory-flu-vaccines.html
HÉR ER „REYKURINN“ FRÁ GERFI FLENSUNNI..
Ef þú trúir mér ekki,skoðaðu þetta þá sjálf/ur!
Kistner Pharm sótti um einkaleyfi á H1N1 bóluefninu 28 ág 2008 áður en virusinn var kominn fram á sjónarsviðið!
Þetta er US Einkaleyfis umsóknaskjalið:
http://www.theoneclickgroup.co.uk/documents/vaccines/Baxter%20Vaccine%20Patent%20Application.pdf
Farðu á bls.7 og þar á 0056 og sjáðu með eigin augum!
HVERNIG GAT BÓLUEFNIÐ ORÐIÐ TIL Á UNDAN VIRUSNUM?
Repost and email everywhere!
Patent Evidence ThatThe ‘Swine Flu’ Pandemic Is Man-Made
http://nbgazette.com/index.php?entry=entry090802-133304
SPURNING:
Hver er munurinn á því að vera skotinn með bóluefni í handlegginn eða byssukúlu í heilann?
SVARIÐ:
Byssukúlu sem skotið er í heilann á þér og þú hlýtur snöggan og sársaukalausan dauða..
Með nál sem er skotið í handlegginn á þér, þá mun dauði þinn vera langur, sársaukafullur, en um leið mjög arðbær fyrir lyfjafyrirtækin og heilbrigðis geirann.
Yfirgnæfandi meirihluti hluthafanna í þessum fyrirtækjum og þeir sem græða mest, er þín eigin ríkisstjórn, þar sem skattarnir þínir eru þeirra aðal tekjulind og billjónum dollara er hreinlega dælt beint í æð þessarra aðila..
Það hafa fleiri látist af völdum bólusetninga en af svínaflensunni!...
Refuse and Resist Mandatory Flu Vaccines
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com/targetfreedom/2009/08/refuse-and-resist-mandatory-flu-vaccines.html
Lömunarveiki (Polio) bóluefnið var mengað af SV40 krabbameins valdandi apa virus.. Að lokum, þá staðfesta 60 ólíkar rannsóknarstofur þessar niðurstöður.
Krabbameins-valdandi SV40 apa virus mengað POLIO (lömunarveiki) bóluefni.
http://www.vaccinetruth.org/page_13.htm
Þýðandi Agný.
HÉR ERU 5 VIDEO SEM ÉG MÆLI MEÐ AÐ SÉ HLUSTAÐ Á EN ÞETTA ER ÚTVARPSVIÐTAL, KANSKI BETRA AÐ SLEPPA ÞVÍ...ÞAÐ ER ÞAÐ GRÓSS SEM KEMUR FRAM Í VIÐTALINU AÐ MAÐUR FÆR SJOKK!
The Swine Flu Vaccination Hoax - Explained (1/5)
http://vodpod.com/watch/2170679-the-swine-flu-vaccination-hoax-explained-15?pod=ingaorama
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 25.9.2023 kl. 14:18 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (9)
Chemtrail's
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/chemtrailsindex.htm
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/wake_up_america.html
(Innskot Agný. Ég myndi nú segja allar þjóðir því það er líka verið að spreyja hér, á fullt af myndum sem sýna þetta sama )
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32781077@N02/show/
ÞESSAR MYNDIR HÉR AÐ OFAN ERU ALLAR MÍNAR. TEKNAR Í REYKJAVIK-HÁLENDINU-BORGARNES -SUÐURLANDI ICELAND
24.6.2008 | 21:12
HVAÐ ER ÞAÐ SEM SUMIR KALLA CHEMTRAIL Er það venjulegur útblástur frá flugvélum...eða?
http://agny.blog.is/blog/agny/entry/576072/
Congressman Admits Chemtrail's
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/congressman_admits_chemtrails.htm
In what may be the first governmental acknowledgement of its kind, a public official from Cleveland, Ohio has referenced"chemtrails" in a bill put before congress. Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D) has submitted bill no. HR 2977 IH ,
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/hr2977ih.htm
which proposes a ban on the weaponization of space.
Bill Text
107th Congress (2001-2002)
H.R.2977.IH
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?c107:chemtrails
One of the weapons systems listed in the bill is "chemtrails". The use of this term is significant because until now, all reported governmental inquiries into this issue have been dismissed or denied.
Agencies such as the Air Force have routinely called reports of chemtrails "a hoax".
CONGRESSMAN ACKNOWLEDGES CHEMTRAILS
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/chemtrailsindex.htm
1949 U.S. Army begins 20 years of simulated germ warfare attacks against American cities, conducting at least 239 open air tests.
1950 Sept. 20-26. One of the biggest experiments involved the use of Serratia marcescens and bacillusglobigi being sprayed over 117 square miles of the San Francisco area, causing pneumonia-like infections in many of the residents.
The family of one elderly man who died in the test sued the government, but lost. To this day, syraceus is a leading cause of death among the elderly in the SanFrancisco area.
1955 Another case was the joint Army-CIA Biological Warfare test in1955, still classified, in which an undisclosed bacteria was released in theTampa Bay region of Florida, causing a dramatic increase in whooping cough infections, ( kíghósta) including twelve deaths.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/popcontrolagenda.htm
The Population Control AgendaPt.2
A History Timeline of Population Control
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/populationcontrolagenda2.htm
The Most Powerful Man In The World? The"Black" Pope
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/blackpope.htm
Secret Societies
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/secretsocietyindex.htm
Still Don't Believe In The New World Order?
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/believe_new_world_order.htm
"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money."
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in ForeignAffairs (July/August 1995)
Men in Obscene Red Fezzes!
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/obscene_red_fezzies.htm
United States Presidents and The Illuminati / Masonic Power Structure.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/uspresidentasmasons.htm
In one of the Royal Institute of International Affairs top secret papers, the scenario is laid out as follows (in part):
"...having been failed by Christianity, and with unemployment on every hand, those who have been without jobs for five years or more will turn away from the church and seek solace indrugs.
That is when full control of the drugtrade must be completed in order that the governments of all countries who are under our jurisdiction will have a MONOPOLY which we will control through supply....
Drug bars will take care of the unruly and the discontent, would be revolutionaries will be turned into harmless addicts with no will of their own...."
There is ample evidence that the CIA and British intelligence, specially M16, have already spent at least a decade working toward this goal. (John Coleman's Committee of 300)
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/committeof300.htm
"No one will enter the New World Order
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/newworldindex.htm
unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unlesshe will take a LUCIFERIAN Initiation." David Spangler, Director of PlanetaryInitiative, United Nations
Who could doubt the validity of the claim that the Government is guilty of poisoning us with today's Chemtrail's after looking at their past offences ofthe same act.
Symptoms from Chemtrail sprayings
It is being reported that people with average or below average immunity are experiencing pneumonia-like respiratory symptoms, while people with stronger immunity are only experiencing slight discomfort for a day or two or no symptoms at all.
Some people have gotten very ill and the symptoms seem to keep returning after a short period of improvement. It's possible that some of these sprayings might contain special bio-engineered pathogens designed to affect only certain racial groups.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/chemtrails_nwo_flu.htm
Goodbye Chemtrails, Hello Blue Skies! The Do-It-Yourself Kit for Sky Repair
(Jan. 26, 2002)
http://educate-yourself.org/goodbyects10jan02.html
The most recent articles on Chemtrails are posted at this link
http://www.rense.com/politics6/chemdatapage.htm
Texas Revenge A possible cure for this flu?
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/texas_revenge.htm
The Chemtrail photos above both were taken in 1999. The upper left was taken in Santa Fe New Mexico Nov. 30th. The upper right was taken in Santa Fe April, 18th.
Reports have been coming in from all across the nation of these chemtrail sightings.
I have seen these myself here in my home state also.
Death and sickness have resulted from these sprayings. We Americans must put a stop to this. Enough is enough.
Airline Manager - Chemtrail's Are Real And Called 'Project Cloverleaf'
Are Chemtrail's the Humane Way?
The following excerpt was taken from an outline of a Government Project:
The Wildlands Project.
...Humanity must drastically scale down its industrial activities on Earth,change its consumption lifestyles, stabilize and then reduce the size of the human population by humane means, and protect and restore wild ecosystems andthe remaining wildlife on the planet." The Wildlands Project
After my article The Timeline of Population Control was posted at Jeff Rense .com, www.rense.com he above quote was removed, and their site has since moved.
However their views remain the same and the article A Wilderness View by Tom Butler editor of Wild Earth from their new site still reflects reduction of human population by so called humane means.
http://www.wild-earth.org/curr_issue/wild.html
This whole chemtrail issue is related to the plan for decreasing the world population to around 450-500 million --and starting with the US first.
Another dark chemtrail hypothesis
http://www.50megs.com/davidicke/icke/magazine/vol10/chem/chemtrailinsider.html 20
I remember Vice President Gore -- he was just elected at that time -- giving a keynote address about reducing population.
And I thought, 'What? Do the American people know what's going on?
The U.N.'s Shocking Agenda
The U.N.'s Shocking Millennium Agenda
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/un_shocking_agenda.htm
Chemtrail's in the Sky While all flights grounded after the World Trade Center Attack
Chemtrail's In The Skies While All Airlines Were Grounded
http://www.rense.com/general13/cem.htm
CONGRESSMAN ACKNOWLEDGES CHEMTRAILS
Chemtrail's over our my house in Mesa Az. 1/21/02
Chemtrail's Through the Ages?
Chemtrail's - Odd 'Cells' ) Found In Fresh Snow Samples
Chemtrail's are the real thing
Chemtrails: The New World Order Flu
Mycoplasma Infection -From GWI To Chemtrail Illness -Extremely Important
Another Dark Chemtrail Hypothesis
Chemtrail Lab Analysis -Virulent Bio-Toxin Soup
Blood Cells And Biological's Found In Chemtrail GroundSample
Chemtrail's Continue To Sicken Many - International UproarBrewing
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/chemtrails_sicken_many.htm
Warfare Chemicals being Tested
Silent Weapons for a Quiet War
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/silentweaponsforquietwars.htm
HAARP: VANDALISM IN THE SKY?
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_vandelism_in_sky.htm
What Is HAARP?
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_index.htm
- And the Educational-Research Complex
and Weather Warfare Weapon
Background of the HAARP Project
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/discordant_haarp.htm
The Air Force Is Preparing To Militarize the Ionosphere - With Electrifying Results
http://www.lightparty.com/Economic/HAARP.html
HAARP Striking a Sour Note
of Destruction
"Irresponsible acts of global vandalism."
Excerpt from 'Youth Action News'
July 1996 Issue
http://www.rense.com/political/weapons/haarp.htm
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_demonic_powers.htm
The "Thunderstorm
Solar Power Satellite"
Can be Easily Heard Around the World on Shortwave Radio. Has Space War Begun?
Tesla's True Wireless and HAARP
Everything You Know is Wrong
by Michael Theroux
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_tesla.htm
ANGELS DON'T PLAY THIS HAARP!
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/angels_dont_play_this_haarp.htm
Advances In Tesla Technology U. S. Government's Ground-Based "Star Wars" Weapon: Frequency Active Auroral Research Program
Author Dr. Nick Begich, M.D. Interviewed By Kenneth Burke
The U.S. Government has a new, ground-based "Star Wars" weapon which is being tested in the remote bush country of Alaska. This new system is intended to heat and lift a portion of the ionosphere above a selected location on the planet in order to make a huge invisible "mirror" for bouncing electromagnetic radiation back to the surface of Earth. Is it wise to poke a hole, as it will do, in Earth's electrical umbrella? Is it wise to prod a dynamic natural system without knowing how it will react? The U.S. Military claims HAARP is designed to communicate with submerged submarines and to penetrate the land with ELF (extremely low frequency) waves to search for hidden tunnels or other sites of military interest. What else can HAARP technology do?
It can, according to author Nick Begich:
- (1) shield a territory from interconnentinental ballistic missiles,
- (2) fry satellites,
- (3) disrupt communications over a large area of the globe,
- (4) change the chemical structure of the upper atmosphere and possibly alter the weather,
- (5) affect human mental functioning, and
- (6) generally impact the health of humans and other biological systems in negative ways.
This system may go fully on-line at any time, perhaps in March (1997), according to some reports.
What is HAARP?
HAARP stands for High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/whats_up_with_haarp.htm
Welcome to The Aurora Page
1993-2015: 23rd year on the Web
Originally created 1993 by Michael Dolan
http://www.geo.mtu.edu/weather/aurora/
Ionospheric Heating
The HF modification facility and the EISCAT UHF radar
http://ion.le.ac.uk/heating/heating.html
The high power RF modification facility at Ramfjordmoen, near Tromso, in northern Norway (69.6 degrees North, 19.2 degrees East, L= 6.2, magnetic dip angle I= 78 degrees) (Rietveld et al, 1993) was constructed jointly by the Max-Planck-Institut fur Aeronomie, Lindau and the University of Tromso. It was completed in 1980 and became part of the EISCAT association in 1993.
Solar - Terrestrial Physics (STP)
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/stp.html
Rocket Into Northern Lights Studies The “Invisible Aurora’s” Electric Currents
Go to Chemtrail Central for more updates
Offsite / Online Links
Massive Chemtrail's Over Idaho,Just Dripping Down
Heavy Chemtrail's Over Austin -Strange, Undiagnosed Illnesses Appear
More Chemtrail's Over Michigan
Is There A Relationship BetweenContrails and UFOs?
CHEMTRAIL CRIMES & COVER UPDOCUMENTED
Chemtrail's Over Brevard, NC
Heavy Chemtrail's Spraying OverSan Francisco
ContrailConnection - Photos, discussion boards, reports ofillness and spraying
http://www.contrailconnection.com/index.html
Will Thomas - the investigative journalist from Canada who broke the story and its related medical ramifications.
http://www.islandnet.com/~wilco/
Back grounder and Photos
http://www.islandnet.com/%7Ewilco/investsky.htm
Will Thomas' Update
http://www.islandnet.com/~wilco/mysites.html
2012PREDICTIONS http://2012-comet.com/category/2012-predictions/
http://www.californiaskywatch.com/ http://www.newyorkskywatch.com/ http://www.dontchemtrailmebro.com/ http://www.chemtrailupdate.com/ http://www.missouriskywatch.com/ http://www.arizonaskywatch.com/
|
Heilbrigðismál | Breytt 17.9.2024 kl. 02:30 | Slóð | Facebook | Athugasemdir (8)
Nota bene
Translate your website into 52 languages
We The People Will Not Be Chipped!
NO VERICHIP INSIDE ME! I WILL NOT BE MARKED AS I WERE A BEAST!
http://www.wethepeoplewillnotbechipped.com/main/news.php
Efni
RSSNýjustu færslur
- "GRAPHEN OXIDE" FRAMHALD UM EFNIÐ SEM YFIRTEKUR!!! “THE BLAC...
- DAUÐSFÖLL AF VÖLDUM GRAPHENE OXIDE ÖREINDARHLUTUM.
- RADDKLÓNUN HLJÓMAR EINS OG VÍSINDASKÁLDSAGA EN ER NÚ ÞEGAR AÐ...
- Ríkisstjórnir og herinn úða eitruðum efnum yfir íbúa til að b...
- Viðbrögð við heimsfaraldrinum voru völd að fleiri dauðsföllum...
Bloggvinir
-
666
-
annasteinunn
-
artboy
-
athena
-
berglindnanna
-
bergthora
-
biddam
-
birgitta
-
bofs
-
brylli
-
coke
-
daystar
-
dofri
-
doriborg
-
ea
-
ellyarmanns
-
estersv
-
fridaeyland
-
gammon
-
gmaria
-
gudrunmagnea
-
gullvagninn
-
gunnipallikokkur
-
habbakriss
-
halkatla
-
hallarut
-
halldorbaldursson
-
hallurg
-
handtoskuserian
-
heida
-
heidathord
-
heidistrand
-
heimskringla
-
hjolagarpur
-
hlynurh
-
hlynurha
-
id
-
ingo
-
ipanama
-
ippa
-
jensgud
-
joninaben
-
jorunn
-
josira
-
kallimatt
-
ketilas08
-
kiddih
-
kiddijoi
-
kiddip
-
killerjoe
-
killjoker
-
kiza
-
kollaogjosep
-
konur
-
limped
-
lovelikeblood
-
lydurarnason
-
malacai
-
mia-donalega
-
molta
-
morgunstjarna
-
nonniblogg
-
ofurbaldur
-
olafurfa
-
omar
-
omarragnarsson
-
overmaster
-
perlaheim
-
poppoli
-
prakkarinn
-
predikarinn
-
proletariat
-
ragnargests
-
rheidur
-
rosabla
-
saethorhelgi
-
salist
-
sigurjonn
-
sigurjonth
-
sirrycoach
-
sjos
-
stebbifr
-
svarthamar
-
sveinnhj
-
tharfagreinir
-
trollchild
-
tru
-
upplystur
-
vertu
-
vglilja
-
vitale
-
alla
-
dufa65
-
andres08
-
gumpurinn
-
danna
-
arit-bloggar
-
apalsson
-
taoistinn
-
asgrimurhartmannsson
-
heiddal
-
brahim
-
gattin
-
brandarar
-
rafdrottinn
-
saxi
-
eysi
-
fafnisbani
-
fiskurinn
-
geiragustsson
-
morgunn
-
gudjonelias
-
gjonsson
-
lostintime
-
tilveran-i-esb
-
conspiracy
-
skodun
-
holi
-
vulkan
-
heim
-
hildurhelgas
-
drum
-
truthseeker
-
holmdish
-
don
-
danjensen
-
ingaghall
-
johannvegas
-
jonasg-eg
-
jonasg-egi
-
joningic
-
jonmagnusson
-
alda111
-
bisowich
-
andmenning
-
kristinthormar
-
lotta
-
ludvikludviksson
-
astroblog
-
vistarband
-
marinomm
-
manisvans
-
minnhugur
-
bylting-strax
-
olafur-62
-
pallvil
-
ljosmyndarinn
-
perlaoghvolparnir
-
sviss
-
bjornbondi99
-
shhalldor
-
infowarrioreggeiri
-
sigvardur
-
thorthunder
-
thee
-
tigercopper
-
vefritid
-
zordis
-
tsiglaugsson
-
thordisb
Nýjustu myndir
Nýjustu myndböndin
Heimsóknir
Flettingar
- Í dag (3.4.): 0
- Sl. sólarhring: 4
- Sl. viku: 63
- Frá upphafi: 0
Annað
- Innlit í dag: 0
- Innlit sl. viku: 41
- Gestir í dag: 0
- IP-tölur í dag: 0
Uppfært á 3 mín. fresti.
Skýringar
265 dagar til jóla
Um bloggið
Hitt og þetta...aðallega hitt...
Eldri færslur
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Nýjustu færslurnar
Nýjustu albúmin
Tenglar
Uppáhalds síður
Margvísleg málefni.
Ýmsir vefir.
- Velvirk börn Félag hæfileikaríkra og skapandi einstaklinga
- Heilsubankinn Meðferðar og þjónustuaðilar
- Sannleikurinn minn Fróðleikur um ýmis heilsumál
- Heimasíðan mín Ýmislegt efni.
- Gagnauga Gagnauga er upplýsingavefur um alþjóðamál
- MSSPJALLIÐ Opið Spjallborð um MS
- Ablechild.org Parents for Label and Drug Free Education
- ASPARTAME KILLS Rumsfeld og Aspartame
- Óvenjuleg og umdeild mál 9/11, samsæriskenningar...
- The National Foundation for Gifted and Creative Children Samtök hæfileikaríkra og skapandi barna
- Upplýsingasíða um MSG If MSG isn´t harmful, why is it hidden?
- Spjallborð um 911 og ýmislegt plott
- Þessi síða er alveg must read ýmislegt sem þú sérð bara hér
- The SPECTRUM Ýmsar greinar
- Label Me Sane Fjallað um ofnotkun lyfja.
- Alliance for Human Research Protection Samtök gegn tilraunum á fólki
- Organic Consumers Association Neytendasamtök fyrir lífrænt
- Freedom Or Facism ? Frelsi eða Facismi?
- Health Truth Revealed Hulunni svipt af heilsu málefnum
- Quackpot Watch "The last days of the Quackbusters "
- True Torah Jews/Jews Against Zionism Traditional Jews Are Not Zionists
- Question 911.com Free DVD download / frítt niðurhal
Talnaspeki / Numerology
Fróðleikur um þessa speki
- Sun - Angel Numerology Frítt dæmi þarna
- Free Numerology Reading Meira en bara talnaspeki..
- Your Reading / Agny Lýsingin á mér...
- INDIGO intentions Tarot, numerology, Indigo children, Reiki, Angels reading
Fyndið stuff.
Myndir, brandarar og glens.
- Cartoons Teiknimyndir
Andleg málefni
Allt sem tengist þeim málum.
- AEROSOL OPERATION CRIMES & COVER-UP SPRAYING US AS A BUG..
- Crystalinks Þessi síða er hreinlega með allt.
- Tarot Cards & Free Readings Frí Tarot spá
- Mind Power News Kraftur hugans.
- Progressive Awareness Research Allt mögulegt andans stuff.
- Tilvitnanir / quotes Ýmsar tilvitnanir
- New Jersey ghost hunter center Drauga "veiðar"
- The Tree of the Golden Light Ýmis andleg mál
- Mayan Calendar Articles Tímatal Mayanna
Stjörnuspeki / Astrology
Fróðleikur um þessa speki.
- The Future Minders Frítt dæmi þarna
Síður um ADD / ADHD
Upplýsingar um athyglisbrest / ofvirkni.
- Dr. Mary Ann Block ,, Find the course, fix the problem".
- A Multisensory Learning Program Kennslugögn fyrir ADD / Autism / Dyslexia
- Exposing the Fraud of ADD and ADHD Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD Neurologist, Pediatric Neurology
- Stimulant Drugs for ADHD and ADD Örvandi lyf við ADHD og ADD
- "Are Psychiatrists Betraying Their Patients?" Eru geðlæknar að svíkja sjúklingana sína?
- "Our Toxic World" " Okkar eitraði heimur"
- No proof mental illness rooted in biology Engin líffræðileg sönnun fyrir geðsjúkdómum
- Death From Ritalin Snannleikurinn á bak við ADHD
- Methylphenidate ( virka efnið í Ritalin) Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section
- What Drugmakers of ADD & ADHD Drugs vilja ekki að þú vitir
- Answers for ADHD Questions Svör við ADHD spurningum.
SSRI lyf og önnur þunglyndislyf
Ýmsar síður um hugarfars breytandi lyf.
- Dangerous Medicine forum Spjallborð
- Antidepressants Facts Staðreyndir um þunglyndislyf.
- SSRI Stories Ekki er sannleikurinn fallegur...
- International Coalition For Drug Awareness Verum meðvituð ...
- PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN NOW Verndum börnin okkar!!
- THE DARK SIDE OF PSYCHIATRY Dökka hlið geðlækninganna
- How psychiatry is making drug addicts out of America´s shool children Amerísk skólabörn gerð að læknadóps fíklum.
- Psyhchiatric Drug Side Effects Search Engine.
- Psyhchiatric Drug Side Effects Search Engine. SEARCH ENGINE
Asperger syndrome og Autism
Síður sem fjalla um Asperger og einhverfu
- Aspergers Syndrome in Children Góð síða (mín skoðun)
Blogg úr ýmsum áttum..
Vinir / áhugaverðir einstaklingar.
- Sigurjón Þórðar.
- Nornin
- Tigra
- Anna panna
- Þarfagreinir
- Katrín ódæla
- Klisja
- Olasteina "Fjarskyld frænka"
- Nornin Vinkona af Baggalút.
- Geiri 3d.
- Laramin
- Sigunzo
- Ditto bloggar Yndisleg og spes manneskja.
AGLOCO
- AGLOCO Borgað fyrir að browsa..
http://skorrdal.com/
MICROCHIP - RFID
- Microchip Implants News Articles MIND CONTROL; ÖRFLÖGUMERKINGAR; RFID
UMDEILD MÁLEFNI
- WIDE EYE CINEMA WIDE EYE CINEMA is dedicated to showcasing the very best alternative truth-related documentaries & cinema uploaded onto the World-Wide Web.
MY FAVORITE SITES
- This site is number 1 on 10 black list sites of US gov. Here you find it all.Specially what the elite do not want you to find
- Alvaran Forum about what some call conspiracy
- Prophecies of Sollog Sollog is a POLITICAL PRISONER of the USA!
- Ingaoramas video VIDEOS
- So you wanna talk conspiracies? try this on for size. JUST GO THERE...
- ConCen An eye openinger
- What you should not know...is here.. Knowing litle about lot is better than know lot about a little...
HAARP
- Chemtrails Data Page Chemtrails - Frequently Asked Questions
CHEMTRAILS
- CHEMTRAIL CENTRAL Þetta er forum um Chemtrails og málefni tengd efna úðun úr lofti..
- Chemtrails news, articles and information Cemtrails=Efnarákir
- CHEMTRAILS -HAARP-GEOENGIERING-DEPOPULATION AT WORK CHEMTRAILS síða- fyrrverandi FBI starfsmaður leysir t.d. frá skjóðunni- núna látinn..
- Efnaúðun -veðurfarsstjórnun í gegnum chemtrails Cemtrails=Efnarákir- Ísland er ekki undanskilið þessu ógeði!
- Chemtrails = Aerosol spraying to change the atmosphere. Chemtrails = Aerosol spraying of barium, "fibers", pathogens.
- Efnaúðun -veðurfarsstjórnun í gegnum chemtrails Cemtrails=Efnarákir
TRANSLATE-ÞÝÐA
- Translate your website into 52 languages Just copy and paste the Translate This Button anywhere on your site, it's free and easy. There are no files to upload and it works on almost any website. The Translate This Button is a lightweight JavaScript translation widget. It translates any page quickly using Ajax and the brilliant Google Translate.
VERICHIP-WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT BE CHIPPED!
Færsluflokkar
- Bloggar
- Bækur
- Dægurmál
- Evrópumál
- Ferðalög
- Fjármál
- Fjölmiðlar
- Heilbrigðismál
- Heilsumálefni
- Kvikmyndir
- Lífstíll
- Ljóð
- Löggæsla
- Mannréttindi
- Matur og drykkur
- Menning og listir
- Menntun og skóli
- Óvenjuleg og umdeild mál
- Samgöngur
- Spaugilegt
- Spil og leikir
- Stjórnmál og samfélag
- Trúmál
- Trúmál og siðferði
- Tölvur og tækni
- Umhverfismál
- Utanríkismál/alþjóðamál
- Vefurinn
- Viðskipti og fjármál
- Vinir og fjölskylda
- Vísindi og fræði
